1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to expandable tubing assemblies and expanding such assemblies to seal a surrounding annulus.
2. Description of the Related Art
Drilling a bore into the earth enables access to hydrocarbons in subsurface formations. The process of drilling a borehole and of subsequently completing the borehole in order to form a wellbore requires the use of various tubular strings. Methods and apparatus utilized in the oil and gas industry enable placing tubular strings in a borehole and then expanding the circumference of the strings in order increase a fluid path through the tubing and in some cases to line the walls of the borehole. Some of the advantages of expanding tubing in a borehole include relative ease and lower expense of handling smaller diameter tubing and ability to mitigate or eliminate formation of a restriction caused by the tubing.
Many applications require creating a seal around one of the tubular strings in the wellbore such that fluid flow through a surrounding annulus is blocked. Various types of conventional packers exist that may be set for this purpose without expanding an inside diameter of the tubing. Further, expandable tubing may include a band of elastomeric material disposed on its outer surface to facilitate sealing. However, these bands produce sealing that is localized only at the band and often unreliable due to too low of a seal pressure being achieved.
Therefore, there exists a need for apparatus and methods that enable improved sealing around tubing that has been expanded.
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to expansion of tubing to create a seal in an annulus surrounding the tubing. A method in one embodiment expands a packer assembly that includes tubing with a sealing element disposed on an outside surface thereof. The sealing element defines thick bands alternating with thin bands that protrude from the outside surface of the tubing less than the thick bands. The method includes expanding the tubing such that relatively greater expansion occurs at where the thin bands are located compared to where the thick bands are located.
A method of expanding a packer assembly for one embodiment includes running tubing with a sealing element disposed on an outside surface thereof into a wellbore. The method includes placing the sealing element into engagement with a surrounding surface. Further, creating undulations in a diameter of the tubing occurs based on alternating first and second properties of the sealing element along a length of the tubing.
An expandable packer assembly according to one embodiment includes tubing having unexpanded and expanded positions. A sealing element disposed on an outside of the tubing defines thick bands alternating along a length of the tubing with thin bands that protrude from the outside of the tubing less than the thick bands. An inner diameter of the tubing along the length is uniform in the unexpanded position and undulations in the inner diameter are at the thin bands in the expanded position.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to expansion of tubing to create a seal in an annulus surrounding the tubing. The tubing includes a sealing material selected to cause forming of undulations in a diameter of the tubing upon expansion of the tubing. The tubing with the sealing material provides improved sealing performance.
By way of example since thickness is suitable for illustration, the profiled sealing material 102 defines a topography that alternates lengthwise over the tubing 104 between thick bands 106 of the sealing material 102 that occupy a greater annular area than thin bands 108 of the sealing material 102. Each of the bands 106, 108 circumscribe the tubing 104 to form a ring shape oriented transverse to a longitudinal bore of the tubing 104. The expandable packer 100 may utilize any number of the bands 106, 108 and in some embodiments has at least one of the thick bands 106 disposed between two of the thin bands 108.
Machining of the sealing material 102 from an initially uniform thickness may create differences in the thickness of the bands 106, 108. Further, separate additional outer sleeves may add to thickness of the sealing material 102 at the thick bands 106. Tailored molding of the sealing material 102 offers another exemplary approach to provide the differences in the thickness between the bands 106, 108 of the sealing material 102.
For some embodiments, a gripping structure or material may be located on the outside of the tubing 104 such that when the tubing 104 is expanded the gripping structure or material moves outward in a radial direction and engages a surrounding surface (e.g., casing or open borehole) to facilitate in anchoring the tubing 104 in place. As an example, the expandable packer 100 includes a grit 110 disposed on the outside of the tubing 104. The grit 110 such as tungsten carbide or silicon carbide may adhere to any portion of the tubing 104 that is to be expanded. In some embodiments, the sealing material 102 at one or more of the thin bands 108 include the grit 110 that is coated on or embedded therein.
Expansion of the tubing 104 may occur utilizing an inflatable expander having a flexible bladder that is pressurized into contact with the inside of the tubing 104. For some embodiments, a compliant (i.e., not a fixed diameter during expansion) cone or a compliant rotary expander tool can achieve expansion of the tubing 104. Further, hydroforming techniques using only fluid pressure to act directly against an inside surface of the tubing 104 may expand the tubing 104. Such hydroforming of the tubing 104 employs seals spaced apart inside the tubing 104 such that hydraulic pressure may be applied to an interior volume of the tubing 104 between the seals.
One potential cause for loss of sealing occurs if the fluid pressure in the annulus between the tubing 104 and wellbore causes the tubing 104 to collapse, thereby pulling the sealing element 102 away from its sealing engagement with the casing 200. The undulations 109 tend to increase collapse resistance of the tubing 104 compared to tubing which has been expanded to have a constant diameter. Thus, the increase in collapse resistance benefits sealing ability of the sealing element 102. Further, the undulations 109 at least reduce any potential decreases in seal load as a result of elastic recovery of the tubing 104 immediately after expansion. The undulations 109 may experience less elastic recovery than when a longer length of the tubing 104 is expanded, thereby mitigating effect of the elastic recovery causing removal of the seal load. While it is believed that these mechanisms enhance sealing performance as determined by test data results described herein, other factors without limitation to any particular theory may alone or in combination cause the improvements in the sealing performance obtained.
Several design factors of the sealing element 102 influence generation of the undulations 109 and resulting seal created by the expandable packer 100. Factors that can influence the amplitude achieved and enable creation of the amplitude that is sufficiently high to provide the seal performance desired include a thickness deviation ratio between the thick and thin bands 106, 108 of the sealing element 102, a pitch of the sealing element 102 as defined by distance between the thick bands 106, the number of undulations 109, the number of bands 106, 108 and the material and dimensional properties of the tubing 104, such as yield strength, ductility, wall thickness and diameter. These design factors in combination with the radial expansion force applied by the expander tool control the amplitude of the undulation 109.
As a comparative example, point 700 on the ratio curve 701 corresponds to prior sealing elements having a uniform thickness across a length that is expanded into sealing engagement such that no undulations exist. Such prior sealing elements can, based on location of the point 700, only maintain sealing at pressures below about 1800 pounds per square inch (psi) (12,410 kilopascal (kPa)).
The selected locations thus identify when the expander tool 900 has been located where desired such as when moving the expander tool 900 from its position at a last expansion cycle to a subsequent length of the tubing 104 for expansion. Use of the locating mechanism 904 helps ensure that a length of the tubing 104 is not missed in the expansion process. Any missed sections may have trapped fluid that inhibits expansion of the missed sections. Attempts to later expand missed sections may force such trapped fluid to collapse surrounding sections of the tubing 104 previously expanded.
In operation, expansion of the expandable packer 100 does not require expensive high pressure pumps on a rig as a mobile pump using relatively less volume can operate the expander tool 900. The expander tool 900 also works reliably over multiple expansion cycles especially given that expansion ratios may be controlled to be less than 50%.
The elastomeric sections 235 may be made from rubber or any other type of resilient material. The elastomeric sections 235 may be coated with a non-friction material (not shown) such as a composite material. The non-friction material is used to reduce the friction between the elastomeric sections 235 and the surrounding tubular. Further, the non-friction material may protect the elastomeric sections 235 from damage or wear which may occur due to multiple expansion operations.
The bands 240 in between the elastomeric sections 235 are used to separate elastomeric sections 235. The bands 240 may be made from any suitable material, such as thin metal, composite material or elastomeric material having a hardness that is different from the elastomeric sections 235.
The expansion tool 325 may be used to expand the expandable packer 100 into an expanded position within a surrounding structure such as an open borehole or casing (not shown). For clarity, the thick bands 106 and the thin bands 108 of the sealing material 102 are not shown. As illustrated, the elastomeric sections 335, 345, 355 are tapered down (or tiered) from one end 355 to another end 345. The reducing diameter of the elastomeric sections 335, 345, 355 may be stepwise (as illustrated), or it may be a continuous reducing diameter, such as cone shaped. The taper in the elastomeric sections 335, 345, 355 may be used to drive fluid out of the annulus between the casing and the sealing material on the expandable packer 100, thereby preventing any pipe collapse due to trapped fluid expansion. The bands 340 between the elastomeric sections 335, 345, 355 are not tapered. However, in one embodiment, the bands 340 may have a taper in a similar manner as the elastomeric sections 335, 345, 355.
Returning back to
It is also to be noted that the expansion tools 225, 325, 425 may be used to form the undulations in the expandable packer 100, 500. In addition, the expansion tools 225, 325, 425 may be used to form undulations in other types of tubulars, such as plain pipe with or without sealing elastomers.
For some embodiments, the expandable packer provides a straddle packer, a liner hanger packer, a bridge plug, a scab liner, a zonal isolation unit or a tie back shoe. The expandable packer enables hanging of liners while providing high pressure sealing. The grit or slips of the expandable packer enhance anchoring capability and may be coated on part of the tubing separate from the sealing element. Further, in any embodiment, the sealing material may be a swellable elastomeric material.
In a further embodiment, a force member may be used to place the tubing of the expandable packer in a compressive state prior to expansion of the expandable packer by placing the tubing in axial compression. While the tubing is in the compressive state, the expandable packer may be expanded such that the tubing plastically deforms to selectively create the undulations as set forth herein. An example of axial compression enhanced tubular expansion is described in US Patent Publication No. 2007/0000664, which is herein incorporated by reference.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/523,656, filed Jun. 14, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/389,090, filed Feb. 19, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,201,636, which claims benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/029,634, filed Feb. 19, 2008. Each of the aforementioned related patent applications is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2748463 | Mueller | Jun 1956 | A |
2812025 | Teague et al. | Nov 1957 | A |
2890724 | Kennedy, Jr. | Jun 1959 | A |
3162245 | Howard et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3358760 | Blagg | Dec 1967 | A |
3385367 | Kollsman | May 1968 | A |
3412565 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3432916 | Reichert et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3477506 | Malone | Nov 1969 | A |
3667543 | Dean | Jun 1972 | A |
3669190 | Sizer et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3722588 | Tamplen | Mar 1973 | A |
3776307 | Young | Dec 1973 | A |
3997193 | Tsuda et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4006619 | Anderson | Feb 1977 | A |
4067386 | Weise | Jan 1978 | A |
4068372 | Kamohara et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4069573 | Rogers et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4193105 | Graafmann | Mar 1980 | A |
4387507 | Kelly | Jun 1983 | A |
4388752 | Vinciguerra et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4418457 | Mueller | Dec 1983 | A |
4422317 | Mueller | Dec 1983 | A |
4567631 | Kelly | Feb 1986 | A |
4581817 | Kelly | Apr 1986 | A |
4724693 | Tedder | Feb 1988 | A |
4923007 | Sanford et al. | May 1990 | A |
4976322 | Abdrakhmanov et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5052483 | Hudson | Oct 1991 | A |
5337823 | Nobileau | Aug 1994 | A |
5667252 | Schafer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5794702 | Nobileau | Aug 1998 | A |
6123148 | Oneal | Sep 2000 | A |
6135208 | Gano et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138761 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6325148 | Trahan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6409226 | Slack et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6691789 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712151 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742598 | Whitelaw et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6789622 | Ducasse et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6860329 | Oosterling | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6964305 | McMahan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7017669 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017670 | Hazel et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7073583 | Anderton et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7152679 | Simpson | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7168497 | Metcalfe et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7228896 | Gazewood | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7350584 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7350585 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360591 | Ring | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360592 | McMahan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7493945 | Doane et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7578354 | Thomson | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7699115 | Baaijens et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7779924 | Clamens | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7828068 | Gano et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020092654 | Coronado et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020195256 | Metcalfe et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030042022 | Lauritzen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030116328 | Doane et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040074640 | Anderton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040112609 | Whanger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040216894 | Maguire | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226723 | Simpson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244994 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000697 | Abercrombie Simpson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023003 | Echols et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050057005 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077052 | Ohmer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050127673 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050217865 | Ring | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060016597 | Emerson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060042801 | Hackworth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060090903 | Gano et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060266530 | Echols | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283607 | Duggan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000664 | Ring et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070205002 | Baaijens et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080000646 | Thomson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080142219 | Steele et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080236230 | Brisco et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2426993 | Dec 2006 | GB |
57058931 | Apr 1982 | JP |
2004007892 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dictionary definition of “Poisson's ratio”, accessed Oct. 17, 2014 via thefreedictionary.com. |
“Poisson's ratio for some common materials”, accessed Oct. 17, 2014 via engineeringtoolbox.com. |
Canadian Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2013, in Canadian Application No. 2,821,318. |
Dictionary definitions of “undulation”, accessed Aug. 5, 2011 via www.thefreedictionary.com. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140054049 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61029634 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13523656 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 13942456 | US | |
Parent | 12389090 | Feb 2009 | US |
Child | 13523656 | US |