The present invention relates generally to the field of orthopaedics, and more particularly, to an implant for use in arthroplasty.
Patients who suffer from the pain and immobility caused by osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis have an option of joint replacement surgery. Joint replacement surgery is quite common and enables many individuals to function properly when it would not be otherwise possible to do so. Artificial joints are usually comprised of metal, ceramic and/or plastic components that are fixed to existing bone.
Such joint replacement surgery is otherwise known as joint arthroplasty. Joint arthroplasty is a well-known surgical procedure by which a diseased and/or damaged joint is replaced with a prosthetic joint. In a typical total joint arthroplasty, the ends or distal portions of the bones adjacent to the joint are resected or a portion of the distal part of the bone is removed and the artificial joint is secured thereto.
There are known to exist many designs and methods for manufacturing implantable articles, such as bone prostheses. Such bone prostheses include components of artificial joints such as elbows, hips, knees and shoulders.
Currently in total hip arthroplasty, a major critical concern is the instability of the joint. Instability is associated with dislocation. Dislocation is particularly a problem in total hip arthroplasty.
Factors related to dislocation include surgical technique, implant design, implant positioning and patient related factors. In total hip arthroplasty, implant systems address this concern by offering a series of products with a range of lateral offsets, neck offsets, head offsets and leg lengths. The combination of these four factors affects the laxity of the soft tissue. By optimizing the biomechanics, the surgeon can provide a patient a stable hip that is more resistant to dislocation.
In order to accommodate the range of patient arthropathy metrics, a wide range of hip implant geometries are currently manufactured by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., the assignee of the current application, and by other companies. In particular, the 5-ROM® total hip systems offered by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. may include up to six neck offsets per stem diameter, six head lengths and one leg length adjustment. The combination of all these biomechanic options is rather complex.
Anteversion of a total hip system is closely linked to the stability of the joint. Improper anteversion can lead to dislocation and patient dissatisfaction. Anteversion control is important in all hip stems. However, it is a more challenging issue with the advent of stems with additional modularity.
The prior art has provided for some addressing of the anteversion problem. For example, the current S-ROM® stems have laser markings on the medial stem and the proximal sleeve. This marking enables the surgeon to measure relative alignment between these components. Since the sleeve has infinite anteversion, it is not necessarily oriented relative to a bony landmark that can be used to define anteversion. In fact, the current sleeves are sometimes oriented with the spout pointing directly laterally into the remaining available bone.
When a primary or index total joint arthroplasty fails, a revision procedure is performed in which the index devices (some or all) are removed. Quite often the remaining bone is significantly compromised compared to a primary hip procedure. Significant bone loss is observed, often with a lack of bone landmarks typically used for alignment.
In a common step in the surgical procedure known as total hip arthroplasty, a trial or substitute stem is first implanted into the patient. The trial is utilized to verify the selected size and shape of the implant in situ on the patient and the patient is subjected to what is known as a trial reduction. This trial reduction represents moving the joint, including the trial implant through selected typical motions for that joint. Current hip instruments provide a series of trials of different sizes to help the surgeon assess the fit and position of the implant. Trials, which are also known as provisionals, allow the surgeon to perform a trial reduction to assess the suitability of the implant and the implant's stability prior to final implant selection. In order to reduce inventory costs and complexity, many trialing systems are modular. For example, in the Excel™ Instrument System, a product of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., there is a series of broaches and a series of neck trials that can be mixed and matched to represent the full range of implants. There is a single fixed relationship between a broach and a neck trial, because these trials represent a system of monolithic stem implants.
Likewise, in the current S-ROME instrument systems provided by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., there are neck trials, proximal body trials, distal stem trials, head trials and sleeve trials. By combining all of these components, the implant is represented. Since the S-ROM® stem is modular and includes a stem and a sleeve, the angular relationship or relative anteversion between the neck and the sleeve is independent and represented by teeth mating between the neck and the proximal body trial. The proximal body trial has fixed transverse bolts that are keyed to the sleeve in the trialing for straight, primary stems. The long stem trials do not have the transverse bolts and are thus not rotationally stable during trial reduction and therefore are not always used by the surgeon.
With the introduction of additional implant modularity, the need for independent positioning of the distal stem, proximal body and any sleeve that comprise the implants is required. Currently, modular stems for one replacement may come with up to thirty four different sleeve geometries, requiring up to seven different reamer attachments and corresponding pilot shafts to prepare the cone region of the sleeve.
While the prior art has attempted to reduce the steps in surgical techniques and improve the ability to precisely remove bone to prepare the bone for receiving a proximal component, the need remains for a system and apparatus to reduce the number of components required to perform hip arthoplasty.
The present invention is directed to alleviate at least some of the problems with the prior art.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a reamer for reaming a portion of a long bone cavity for use in implanting a joint prosthesis is provided. The reamer is for cooperation with a portion of an orthopaedic implant component and includes an expandable body that is adapted to adjust between a plurality of diameters. A plurality of cutting edges extending outwardly from the body is also included. The edges are adapted for cooperation with bone, such that the cutting edges expand as the expandable body expands.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method for reaming a portion of a long bone cavity for use in implanting a joint prosthesis is provided. The reamer is used in cooperation with a portion of an orthopaedic implant component. The method includes reaming a distal portion of the long bone using a distal reamer as well as reaming a proximal portion of the long bone using a proximal reamer. At least one of the distal reamer and proximal reamer is an expandable reamer, such that one of the distal reamer and proximal reamer includes an expandable body adapted to adjust between a plurality of diameters.
According to yet another embodiment of the present invention, a kit for reaming a portion of a long bone cavity for use in implanting a joint prosthesis is provided. The reamers are used in cooperation with portions of an orthopaedic implant component. The kit includes a distal reamer for reaming a distal portion of the long bone, a proximal reamer for reaming a proximal portion of the long bone, and a pilot shaft for insertion into a reamed distal portion and attachment to the proximal reamer during the reaming of the proximal portion. At least one of the distal reamer, proximal reamer, and pilot shaft is expandable, such that one of the distal reamer, proximal reamer, and pilot shaft includes an expandable body adapted to adjust between a plurality of diameters.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a is a plan view of the expandable distal reamer of
a is a plan view of the expandable proximal reamer of
a is a plan view of the expandable pilot shaft of
a is a plan view of the expandable proximal reamer of
Embodiments of the present invention and the advantages thereof are best understood by referring to the following descriptions and drawings, wherein like numerals are used for like and corresponding parts of the drawings.
Referring now to
The diameter “D” of the distal reamer 8 is determined by the size of the distal stem (not shown) that is to be implanted into the femur 2. Because of variances in human anatomy, there are numerous sizes of distal stems that can be implanted. Therefore, there are numerous sizes of reamers 8 that can also be used. The large number of reamers 8 can increase production and manufacturing costs, as well as create problems during the surgery should the doctor select the wrong size distal reamer 8 to be used.
Turning now to
As shown in
The gear 18 may be activated by inserting a chuck (not shown) into a hole 24 of the proximal portion 16 and then rotating the chuck. Alternatively, a gauge 25 (
Once the gears 18, 20 are activated, the gear 20 forces a cone 26 down through the proximal portion 16 into the distal cutting portion 17. As the cone 26 moves downwardly, the cone's increasing diameter forces the distal cutting portion 17 to become enlarged. As stated above, the reamer 8a includes slits 22a, 22b. These slits 22a, 22b allow the distal portion 17 to expand as the cone 26 pushes further into the distal portion 17. Therefore, the diameter Da of the reamer 8a also increases.
In
As shown in
After the distal region of the femur 2 is reamed, the proximal portion must then be reamed. As shown in
Turning now to
Similar to the distal reamer 8a shown in
The gear 18 may be activated by inserting a chuck (not shown) into a hole 43 of the proximal portion 16 and then rotating the chuck. Alternatively, a gauge 44 (
Once the gears 39, 40 are activated, the gear 40 forces a cone 48 down through the proximal portion 37 into the distal cutting portion 38. As the cone 48 moves downwardly, the cone's increasing diameter forces the distal cutting portion 38 to become enlarged. As stated above, the reamer 30a includes slits 42a, 42b. These slits 42a, 42b allow the distal portion 38 to expand as the cone 48 pushes further into the distal portion 38. Therefore, the diameters d1a and d1b of the proximal reamer 30a also increase.
In
As shown in
Turning now to
Turning now to
As shown in
In all of the embodiments discussed above, whether for distal reamers, proximal reamers, or pilot shafts, the various gauges and/or markings may also include preset stops that correspond to certain sizes. Such preset stops would make it easier for a user to accurately stop adjusting at the correct diameter. The preset stops may be fashioned out of notches in a thread or any other known mechanism.
Turning now to
As a user rotates the screw 102, the threads 104a cause the threaded portions 140b, 104c to also rotate. The threaded portions 104b, 104c are also threadably engaged with a thread 104d, such that when the threaded portions 104b, 104c are rotated, the threaded portion 104d also rotates. The threaded portion 104d is coupled to a cone 106, such that as the threaded portion 104d rotates, the cone 106 moves in a downward direction 112 (
As shown in
Turning now to
In some embodiments of the present invention, a kit for reaming the long bone is provided, including distal reamers, proximal reamers, and pilot shafts. The kit includes at least one reamer that is an expandable reamer. In some embodiments, both the distal reamer and the proximal reamers will be expandable. In other embodiments, only one of the types of reamer will be expandable. In some embodiments, the pilot shaft may also be expandable.
According to some embodiments of the present invention, the expandable reamers may be able to expand to all sizes required for that type of reamer. In other embodiments, the expandable reamers may only expand through a range, and a plurality of reamers may still be required. For example, if the expandable reamer is a proximal reamer, a kit may include three expandable proximal reamers. Each expandable proximal reamer in such a kit has a diameter that is variable within a range.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/743,325 entitled “EXPANDABLE PROXIMAL REAMER”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2091628 | Carlson | Aug 1937 | A |
3702611 | Fishbein | Nov 1972 | A |
4047829 | Benjamin et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4050840 | Skingle | Sep 1977 | A |
5122134 | Borzone et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5190548 | Davis | Mar 1993 | A |
5904686 | Zucherman | May 1999 | A |
6117138 | Burrows et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6224604 | Suddaby | May 2001 | B1 |
6238398 | Lechot | May 2001 | B1 |
6383188 | Kuslich | May 2002 | B2 |
6517581 | Blamey | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6840944 | Suddaby | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6902568 | Serhan | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918914 | Bauer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7229457 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7632276 | Fishbein | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674265 | Smith | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020095214 | Hyde | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020133233 | Blamey | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040073224 | Bauer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050075638 | Collazo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096685 | Murphy et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113836 | Lozier et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060217730 | Termanini | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1346694 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2003522587 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2005323787 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006524109 | Oct 2006 | JP |
WO 0012832 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0160268 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2004096055 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004096055 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for Corresponding EPO Application No. 08251572.7-1526 Dated Dec. 1, 2008, 10 Pages. |
European Search Report for Corresponding EPO Application No. 10189191.9-1526 Dated Jan. 14, 2011, 10 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120130379 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11743325 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 13360992 | US |