1. Field of the Invention
This application relates generally to gripping mechanisms for downhole tools.
2. Description of the Related Art
Tractors for moving within underground boreholes are used for a variety of purposes, such as oil drilling, mining, laying communication lines, and many other purposes. In the petroleum industry, for example, a typical oil well comprises a vertical borehole that is drilled by a rotary drill bit attached to the end of a drill string. The drill string may be constructed of a series of connected links of drill pipe that extend between ground surface equipment and the aft end of the tractor. Alternatively, the drill string may comprise flexible tubing or “coiled tubing” connected to the aft end of the tractor. A drilling fluid, such as drilling mud, is pumped from the ground surface equipment through an interior flow channel of the drill string and through the tractor to the drill bit. The drilling fluid is used to cool and lubricate the bit, and to remove debris and rock chips from the borehole, which are created by the drilling process. The drilling fluid returns to the surface, carrying the cuttings and debris, through the annular space between the outer surface of the drill pipe and the inner surface of the borehole.
Tractors for moving within downhole passages are often required to operate in harsh environments and limited space. For example, tractors used for oil drilling may encounter hydrostatic pressures as high as 16,000 psi and temperatures as high as 300° F. Typical boreholes for oil drilling are 3.5-27.5 inches in diameter. Further, to permit turning, the tractor length should be limited. Also, tractors must often have the capability to generate and exert substantial force against a formation. For example, operations such as drilling require thrust forces as high as 30,000 pounds.
Western Well Tool, Incorporated has developed a variety of downhole tractors for drilling, completion and intervention processes for wells and boreholes. For example, the Puller-Thruster tractor is a multi-purpose tractor (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,003,606, 6,286,592, and 6,601,652) that can be used in rotary, coiled tubing and wireline operations. A method of moving is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,230,813. The Electro-hydraulically Controlled tractor (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,241,031 and 6,427,786) defines a tractor that utilizes both electrical and hydraulic control methods. The Electrically Sequenced tractor (U.S. Pat. No. 6,347,674) defines a sophisticated electrically controlled tractor. The Intervention tractor (also called the tractor with improved valve system, U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,341 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0168828) is preferably an all hydraulic tractor intended for use with coiled tubing that provides locomotion downhole to deliver heavy loads such as perforation guns and sand washing. All of these patents and patent applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirities.
These various tractors can provide locomotion to pull or push various types of loads. For each of these various types of tractors, various types of gripper elements have been developed. Thus one important part of the downhole tractor tool is its gripper system.
In one known design, a tractor comprises an elongated body, a propulsion system for applying thrust to the body, and grippers for anchoring the tractor to the inner surface of a borehole or passage while such thrust is applied to the body. Each gripper has an actuated position in which the gripper substantially prevents relative movement between the gripper and the inner surface of the passage, and a retracted position in which the gripper permits substantially free relative movement between the gripper and the inner surface of the passage. Typically, each gripper is slidingly engaged with the tractor body so that the body can be thrust longitudinally while the gripper is actuated. The grippers preferably do not substantially impede “flow-by,” the flow of fluid returning from the drill bit up to the ground surface through the annulus between the tractor and the borehole surface.
Tractors may have at least two grippers that alternately actuate and reset to assist the motion of the tractor. In one cycle of operation, the body is thrust longitudinally along a first stroke length while a first gripper is actuated and a second gripper is retracted. During the first stroke length, the second gripper moves along the tractor body in a reset motion. Then, the second gripper is actuated and the first gripper is subsequently retracted. The body is thrust longitudinally along a second stroke length. During the second stroke length, the first gripper moves along the tractor body in a reset motion. The first gripper is then actuated and the second gripper subsequently retracted. The cycle then repeats. Alternatively, a tractor may be equipped with only a single gripper, for example for specialized applications of well intervention, such as movement of sliding sleeves or perforation equipment.
Grippers can be designed to be powered by fluid, such as drilling mud in an open tractor system or hydraulic fluid in a closed tractor system. Typically, a gripper assembly has an actuation fluid chamber that receives pressurized fluid to cause the gripper to move to its actuated position. The gripper assembly may also have a retraction fluid chamber that receives pressurized fluid to cause the gripper to move to its retracted position. Alternatively, the gripper assembly may have a mechanical retraction element, such as a coil spring or leaf spring, which biases the gripper back to its retracted position when the pressurized fluid is discharged. Motor-operated or hydraulically controlled valves in the tractor body can control the delivery of fluid to the various chambers of the gripper assembly.
The original design of the Western Well Tool Puller-Thruster tractor incorporated the use of an inflatable reinforced rubber packer (i.e., “Packerfoot”) as a means of anchoring the tool in the well bore. This original gripper concept was improved with various types of reinforcement in U.S. Pat. No. 6,431,291, entitled “Packerfoot Having Reduced Likelihood of Bladder Delamination.” This patent is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This concept developed a “gripper” with an expansion of the diameter of approximately 1 inch. This design was susceptible to premature failure of the fiber terminations, subsequent delamination and pressure boundary failure.
The second “gripper” concept was the Roller Toe Gripper (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,464,003 and 6,640,894). These patents are incorporated herein by reference in their entirities. The current embodiment of this gripper works exceedingly well, however in one current embodiment, there are limits to the extent of diametrical expansion, thus limiting the well bore variations compatible with the “gripper” anchoring. Historically, the average diametrical expansion has averaged approximately 2 inches. Several advantages of the RTG compared to the bladder concept were enhanced service life, reliability and “free expansion” capabilities. Free Expansion is a condition when the gripper is completely inflated but does not have a wall to anchor against. This condition is usually only applicable in non-cased or “open-hole” bores. The RTG concept used a ramp and roller combination to radially expand a leaf spring like “toe” to anchor the tractor to the casing. The radial expansion could be fixed with mechanical stops, thereby reducing the risk of overstressing due to free expansion.
Additionally, the prior art includes a variety of different types of grippers for tractors. One type of gripper comprises a plurality of frictional elements, such as metallic friction pads, blocks, or plates, which are disposed about the circumference of the tractor body. The frictional elements are forced radially outward against the inner surface of a borehole under the force of fluid pressure. However, many of these gripper designs are either too large to fit within the small dimensions of a borehole or have limited radial expansion capabilities. Also, the size of these grippers often cause a large pressure drop in the flow-by fluid, i.e., the fluid returning from the drill bit up through the annulus between the tractor and the borehole. The pressure drop makes it harder to force the returning fluid up to the surface. Also, the pressure drop may cause drill cuttings to drop out of the main fluid path and clog up the annulus.
Another type of gripper comprises a bladder that is inflated by fluid to bear against the borehole surface. While inflatable bladders provide good conformance to the possibly irregular dimensions of a borehole, they do not provide very good torsional resistance. In other words, bladders tend to permit a certain degree of undesirable twisting or rotation of the tractor body, which may confuse the tractor's position sensors. Additionally, some bladder configurations have durability issues as the bladder material may wear and degrade with repeated usage cycles. Also, some bladder configurations may substantially impede the flow-by of fluid and drill cuttings returning up through the annulus to the surface.
Yet another type of gripper comprises a combination of bladders and flexible beams oriented generally parallel to the tractor body on the radial exterior of the bladders. The ends of the beams are maintained at a constant radial position near the surface of the tractor body, and may be permitted to slide longitudinally. Inflation of the bladders causes the beams to flex outwardly and contact the borehole wall. This design effectively separates the loads associated with radial expansion and torque. The bladders provide the loads for radial expansion and gripping onto the borehole wall, and the beams resist twisting or rotation of the tractor body. While this design represents a significant advancement over previous designs, the bladders provide limited radial expansion loads. As a result, the design is less effective in certain environments. Also, this design impedes to some extent the flow of fluid and drill cuttings upward through the annulus.
Some types of grippers have gripping elements that are actuated or retracted by causing different surfaces of the gripper assembly to slide against each other. Moving the gripper between its actuated and retracted positions involves substantial sliding friction between these sliding surfaces. The sliding friction is proportional to the normal forces between the sliding surfaces. A major disadvantage of these grippers is that the sliding friction can significantly impede their operation, especially if the normal forces between the sliding surfaces are large. The sliding friction may limit the extent of radial displacement of the gripping elements as well as the amount of radial gripping force that is applied to the inner surface of a borehole. Thus, it may be difficult to transmit larger loads to the passage, as may be required for certain operations, such as drilling. Another disadvantage of these grippers is that drilling fluid, drill cuttings, and other particles can get caught between and damage the sliding surfaces as they slide against one another. Also, such intermediate particles can add to the sliding friction and further impede actuation and retraction of the gripper.
In one embodiment, the present application relates to a gripper for use in a downhole tool such as a tractor that overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art noted above. In some embodiments, the gripper can be configured to provide a desired expansion force over a wide range of expansion diameters. Moreover, the gripper can be highly reliable and durable in operation.
In some embodiments, a gripper assembly for at least temporarily anchoring within a passage is disclosed. The gripper assembly has an actuated position in which said gripper assembly substantially prevents movement between said gripper assembly and an inner surface of said passage, and a retracted position in which said gripper assembly permits substantially free relative movement between said gripper assembly and said inner surface of said passage. The gripper assembly comprises a gripper and an interface section. The gripper defines an interface portion and a gripping surface configured to contact the inner surface of the passage. The interface section is pivotably mounted to a first pivot and a second pivot spaced from said first pivot. One of said interface portion and said interface section comprises a roller. The other of said interface portion and said interface segment defines a rolling surface against which said roller moves. One of said first pivot and said second pivot is capable of moving radially while said roller moves against said rolling surface.
In some embodiments, a gripper assembly for anchoring a tool within a passage and for assisting movement of said tool within said passage is disclosed. The gripper assembly is movable along an elongated shaft of said tool. The gripper assembly has an actuated position in which said gripper assembly substantially prevents movement between said gripper assembly and an inner surface of said passage and a retracted position in which said gripper assembly permits substantially free relative movement between said gripper assembly and said inner surface of said passage. The gripper assembly comprises an actuator, an expandable assembly, a toe, and a roller mechanism. The actuator is configured to selectively move the gripper assembly between the actuated position and the retracted position. The expandable assembly comprises a plurality of segments pivotally connected in series. The expandable assembly is coupled to the actuator such that the expandable assembly is selectively moveable between a retracted position in which a longitudinal axis of the expandable assembly is substantially parallel with the elongated shaft and an expanded position in which the segments of the expandable assembly are buckled radially outward with respect to the elongated shaft. The toe has a first end, a second end, and a central area. The first and second ends are pivotally coupled to the elongated shaft such that they maintain an at least substantially constant radial position with respect to a longitudinal axis of the elongated shaft. The central area is radially expandable with respect to the elongated shaft such that an expanded position of the toe corresponds to the actuated position of the gripper assembly and a retracted position of the toe corresponds to the retracted position of the gripper assembly. The roller mechanism is rotatably coupled to an inner surface of the central area of the toe. The roller mechanism is configured to interface with an outer surface of a segment of the expandable assembly such that as the expandable assembly is buckled by the actuator, the roller mechanism is advanced up the segment and the toe is expanded.
In some embodiments, a method of at least temporarily anchoring a tool within a passage is disclosed. The method may be achieved through generation of a radial expansion force by a gripper of the tool. The method comprises providing a tool, and generating radial expansion force. The step of providing a tool comprises providing a tool having a gripper comprising a radially expandable toe having a roller mechanism positioned on the radially inward side of the toe and an expandable assembly comprising a plurality of segments pivotally coupled in series and positioned radially inward of the toe. The expandable assembly is configured to radially expand the toe by interfacing with the roller mechanism. Generating radial expansion force comprises generating radial expansion force at the toe and comprises: advancing the roller mechanism on the toe along an outer surface of a first segment of the expandable assembly; and buckling the expandable assembly such that one end of the first segment is moved radially outward.
In some embodiments, a method of at least temporarily anchoring a tool within a passage is disclosed. The method is achieved through generation of a radial expansion force by a gripper of the tool and comprises providing a tool, generating a radial expansion force over a first expansion range, generating radial expansion force over a second expansion, generating radial expansion force over a third expansion range. Providing a tool comprises providing a tool having a gripper comprising a radially expandable toe and a link assembly positioned radially inward of the toe and configured to radially expand the toe. Generating radial expansion force over a first expansion range can be by advancing a roller mechanism on the toe of the gripper up a ramp coupled to a link of the link assembly. Generating radial expansion force over a second expansion range can be by advancing the roller mechanism over an outer surface of a link of the link assembly and by buckling of the link assembly radially outward with respect to the tool. Generating radial expansion force over a third expansion range can be by advancing the roller mechanism over an outer surface of the link of the link assembly.
In certain embodiments, the Expandable Ramp Gripper or ERG incorporates the use of a plurality of interconnected links to produce a dual radial force mechanism. Initially, the links can desirably provide a combination of a toggle mechanism and roller/ramp mechanism to produce two sources of radial force. As the centerline of the two links approaches a predetermined deployment angle, such as, for example, approximately 90°, the toggle mechanism no longer contributes and the roller/ramp mechanism provides the sole source of radial force.
The ERG gripper, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
The ERG gripper can be broken down into several sub assemblies for ease of description. For example, as discussed herein, the ERG is categorized into cylinder assembly, expandable assembly, and toe assembly. While each ERG gripper subassembly is described herein with respect to the illustrated embodiments as comprising various structural components, it is contemplated that in alternate embodiments, the structural components could form part of other sub assemblies. For example, while as further discussed below and illustrated herein, the toe assembly can include a buckling pin to interface with a flange on the expandable assembly, in other embodiments, the toe assembly can include a flange and a pin can be located on the expandable assembly.
Actuator or Cylinder Assembly
As noted above,
With reference to
In the embodiment illustrated in
As illustrated in
Toe Assembly
With reference to
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
With reference to
Expandable Assembly
With reference to
With reference to
Various materials can be chosen for the expandable assembly to meet desired strength and longevity requirements. Certain materials used in the links 118, 120, and the pins 154, 156 can result in premature galling and wear of the links 118, 120, and a reduced assembly longevity. Undesirably, galling of the links 118, 120, can result in increased retention of debris by the expandable assembly and, in some instances, difficulty in retracting the gripper, and difficulty removing the gripper from a passage. In one embodiment, the links 118, 120 of the expandable assembly are comprised of inconel. In some embodiments, the pins 154, 156 can be comprised of copper beryllium. More preferably, the pins 154, 156 can be comprised of tungsten carbide (with cobalt or nickel binder) to provide an increased operational fatigue life and reduced tendency to gall the links 118, 120.
As illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, substantially the entire expandable assembly underlies the recess in the radially inner side of the central area of the toe 122 in which the roller 124 is positioned. Thus, advantageously, an ERG gripper assembly can be configured such that the expandable assembly and toe assembly comprise a relatively small axial length in comparison to existing gripper assemblies. Thus, when incorporated in a tractor with a given axial length, the ERG can have a relatively long propulsion cylinder assembly allowing for a relatively long piston stroke for axial movement of the tractor. This relatively long piston stroke can facilitate rapid movement of the ERG as fewer piston cycles will be necessary to traverse a given distance.
Operation Description
First Expansion Stage
In
During this first expansion stage, the ramp of the sliding sleeve 116 makes contact with the roller 124 on the toe 122, such that the interface of the roller mechanism with the ramp can produce forces with radial and axial components. The produced radial force can drive the central area of the toe 122 radially outward. The produced axial component can react directly against the axial force produced by the piston 114 of the cylinder assembly (
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Second Expansion Stage
With reference to
The load path during the second stage of expansion remains relatively comparable to that of the first stage described above once the expandable assembly has buckled. During the second stage of expansion, radial expansion forces are generated both by the interaction of the roller 124 with the second link 120 and by interaction of the boss 157 on the second link 120 with the track 125 on the toe 122. With the illustrated linkage geometry, the radial force generated by the links 118, 120 as applied to the track 125 of the toe increases through this stage while the radial force generated by the roller 124 interacting with the second link 120 can vary depending on the tangent angle between them. This tangent angle can vary based on the expansion angle of the second link 120 relative to the longitudinal axis of the mandrel 102 (
The surface profile of the second link 120, in contact with the roller 124, can be configured to provide a desired force distribution over the second expansion stage. This surface shaping allows the link 120 and roller 124 system to produce fairly consistent radial force within a desired expansion force range throughout the expansion range of the toe 122. Additionally, the links 118, 120 continue to provide a secondary radial force through the second stage of the expansion. In the initial stage, the fixed ramp defined by the sliding sleeve 116 had a substantially constant angle (and thus provided substantially constant radial load). In light of the variance in radial force produced during the second stage of engagement, desirably, the surface of the second link 120 is configured so that the mechanism produces a radial force in an acceptable working range over the expansion range of the mechanism.
Third Expansion Stage
With reference to
Once expansion of the ERG is complete, it can be desirable to return the gripper to a retracted configuration, such as, for example to retract a tractor from a passage. It is desirable when removing the gripper from a tractor that the gripper assembly be in the retracted position to reduce the risk that the tractor can become stuck downhole. Thus, the actuator and expandable assembly of the ERG can desirably be configured to provide a failsafe to bias the gripper assembly into the retracted position. As noted above, upon release of hydraulic fluid the spring return in the actuator returns the piston. Thus, the spring returned actuator in the illustrated embodiment of the ERG advantageously provides a failsafe to return the gripper to the retracted configuration. The spring return in the actuator acts on both the operating sleeve 104 and the sliding sleeve 116 to return the expandable assembly into the retracted position. This spring-biased return action on two sides of the expandable assembly returns the expandable assembly to the retracted position. Specifically, the toes 122 will collapse as the expandable assembly collapses and the roller 124 moves down the second link 120 onto the ramp of the sliding sleeve 116.
Exemplary Radial Force Curve
With continued reference to
With reference to
While
Although this application discloses certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present inventions extend beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Further, the various features of these inventions can be used alone, or in combination with other features of these inventions other than as expressly described above. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present inventions herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/781,885, entitled “EXPANDABLE RAMP GRIPPER,” filed on Mar. 13, 2006 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/876,738, entitled “EXPANDABLE RAMP GRIPPER,” filed on Dec. 22, 2006. Also, this application hereby incorporates by reference the above-identified provisional applications, in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2167194 | Anderson | Jul 1939 | A |
2271005 | Grebe | Jan 1942 | A |
2569457 | Dale et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
2727722 | Conboy | Dec 1955 | A |
2946565 | Williams | Jul 1960 | A |
2946578 | De Smaele | Jul 1960 | A |
3138214 | Bridwell | Jun 1964 | A |
3180436 | Kellner et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3180437 | Kellner et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3185225 | Ginies | May 1965 | A |
3224513 | Weeden, Jr. | Dec 1965 | A |
3224734 | Hill | Dec 1965 | A |
3225843 | Ortloff et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3376942 | Van Winkle | Apr 1968 | A |
3497019 | Ortloff | Feb 1970 | A |
3599712 | Magill | Aug 1971 | A |
3606924 | Malone | Sep 1971 | A |
3661205 | Belorgey | May 1972 | A |
3664416 | Nicolas et al. | May 1972 | A |
3797589 | Kellner et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3827512 | Edmond | Aug 1974 | A |
RE28449 | Edmond | Jun 1975 | E |
3941190 | Conover | Mar 1976 | A |
3978930 | Schroeder | Sep 1976 | A |
3992565 | Gatfield | Nov 1976 | A |
4040494 | Kellner | Aug 1977 | A |
4085808 | Kling | Apr 1978 | A |
4095655 | Still | Jun 1978 | A |
4141414 | Johansson | Feb 1979 | A |
4314615 | Sodder, Jr. et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4365676 | Boyadjieff et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4372161 | de Buda et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4385021 | Neeley | May 1983 | A |
4440239 | Evans | Apr 1984 | A |
4463814 | Horstmeyer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4558751 | Huffaker | Dec 1985 | A |
4573537 | Hirasuna et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4615401 | Garrett | Oct 1986 | A |
4674914 | Wayman et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686653 | Staron et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4811785 | Weber | Mar 1989 | A |
4821817 | Cendre et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4854397 | Warren et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4951760 | Cendre et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5010965 | Schmelzer | Apr 1991 | A |
5052211 | Cohrs et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5090259 | Shishido et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5169264 | Kimura | Dec 1992 | A |
5184676 | Graham et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186264 | du Chaffaut | Feb 1993 | A |
5310012 | Cendre et al. | May 1994 | A |
5363929 | Williams et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5419405 | Patton | May 1995 | A |
5425429 | Thompson | Jun 1995 | A |
5449047 | Schivley, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5467832 | Orban et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5519668 | Montaron | May 1996 | A |
5542253 | Ganzel | Aug 1996 | A |
5613568 | Sterner et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5752572 | Baiden et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758731 | Zollinger | Jun 1998 | A |
5758732 | Liw | Jun 1998 | A |
5765640 | Milne et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794703 | Newman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803193 | Krueger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5845796 | Miller | Dec 1998 | A |
5857731 | Heim et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5947213 | Angle et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954131 | Sallwasser | Sep 1999 | A |
5960895 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5996979 | Hrusch | Dec 1999 | A |
6003606 | Moore et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026911 | Angle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031371 | Smart | Feb 2000 | A |
6089323 | Newman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112809 | Angle | Sep 2000 | A |
6230813 | Moore et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241031 | Beaufort et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273189 | Gissler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286592 | Moore et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6345669 | Buyers et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347674 | Bloom et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378627 | Tubel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6427786 | Beaufort et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6431270 | Angle | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431291 | Moore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464003 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6478097 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6601652 | Moore et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629568 | Post et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640894 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679341 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6715559 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745854 | Bloom et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758279 | Moore et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6910533 | Guerrero | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920936 | Sheiretov et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938708 | Bloom et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953086 | Simpson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7048047 | Bloom et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059417 | Moore et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080700 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080701 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7121364 | Mock et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7174974 | Bloom et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185716 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188681 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191829 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7275593 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7343982 | Mock et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353886 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7392859 | Mock et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7493967 | Mock et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
20010045300 | Fincher et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032126 | Kusmer | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020079107 | Simpson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088648 | Krueger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112859 | Bloom et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030024710 | Post et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030116356 | Bloom et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030150609 | Stoesz | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030183383 | Guerrero | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040168828 | Mock et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050034874 | Guerrero et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082055 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050146416 | Doerling et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050217861 | Misselbrook | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247488 | Mock et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060108151 | Moore et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060180318 | Doering et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201716 | Bloom et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070181298 | Sheiretov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2439063 | Feb 1976 | DE |
2920049 | Feb 1981 | DE |
0 149 528 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0 951 611 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0 257 744 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 767 289 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1 281 834 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1344893 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 350 917 | Mar 2008 | EP |
894117 | Apr 1962 | GB |
1105701 | Mar 1968 | GB |
2 241 723 | Sep 1991 | GB |
2 305 407 | Apr 1997 | GB |
2 310 871 | Sep 1997 | GB |
2 346 908 | Aug 2000 | GB |
WO 8905391 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO 9213226 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 9318277 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9427022 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9521987 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 0036266 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0046461 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0244509 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 2008104177 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008104178 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008104179 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070209806 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60781885 | Mar 2006 | US | |
60876738 | Dec 2006 | US |