The present invention relates generally to an expandable reamer apparatus for drilling a subterranean borehole and, more particularly, to an expandable reamer apparatus for enlarging a subterranean borehole beneath a casing or liner.
Expandable reamers are typically employed for enlarging subterranean borehole. Conventionally in drilling oil, gas, and geothermal wells, casing is installed and cemented to prevent the well bore walls from caving into the subterranean borehole while providing requisite shoring for subsequent drilling operation to achieve greater depths. Casing is also conventionally installed to isolate different formations, to prevent crossflow of formation fluids, and to enable control of formation fluid and pressure as the borehole is drilled. To increase the depth of a previously drilled borehole, new casing is laid within and extended below the previous casing. While adding additional casing allows a borehole to reach greater depths, it has the disadvantage of narrowing the borehole. Narrowing the borehole restricts the diameter of any subsequent sections of the well because the drill bit and any further casing must pass through the existing casing. As reductions in the borehole diameter are undesirable because they limit the production flow rate of oil and gas through the borehole, it is often desirable to enlarge a subterranean borehole to provide a larger borehole diameter for installing additional casing beyond previously installed casing as well as to enable better production flow rates of hydrocarbons through the borehole.
A variety of approaches have been employed for enlarging a borehole diameter. One conventional approach used to enlarge a subterranean borehole includes using eccentric and bi-center bits. For example, an eccentric bit with a laterally extended or enlarged cutting portion is rotated about its axis to produce an enlarged borehole diameter. An example of an eccentric bit is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,635,738, assigned to the assignee of the present invention. A bi-center bit assembly employs two longitudinally superimposed bit sections with laterally offset axes, which when rotated produce an enlarged borehole diameter. An example of a bi-center bit is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,957,223, which is also assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
Another conventional approach used to enlarge a subterranean borehole includes employing an extended bottom-hole assembly with a pilot drill bit at the distal end thereof and a reamer assembly some distance above. This arrangement permits the use of any standard rotary drill bit type, be it a rock bit or a drag bit, as the pilot bit, and the extended nature of the assembly permits greater flexibility when passing through tight spots in the borehole as well as the opportunity to effectively stabilize the pilot drill bit so that the pilot hole and the following reamer will traverse the path intended for the borehole. This aspect of an extended bottom-hole assembly is particularly significant in directional drilling. The assignee of the present invention has, to this end, designed as reaming structures so called “reamer wings,” which generally comprise a tubular body having a fishing neck with a threaded connection at the top thereof and a tong die surface at the bottom thereof also with a threaded connection. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,497,842 and 5,495,899, both assigned to the assignee of the present invention, disclose reaming structures including reamer wings. The upper midportion of the reamer wing tool includes one or more longitudinally extending blades projecting generally radially outwardly from the tubular body, the outer edges of the blades carrying PDC cutting elements.
As mentioned above, conventional expandable reamers may be used to enlarge a subterranean borehole and may include blades pivotably or hingedly affixed to a tubular body and actuated by way of a piston disposed therein as disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,402,856 to Warren. In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 6,360,831 to Åkesson et al. discloses a conventional borehole opener comprising a body equipped with at least two hole opening arms having cutting means that may be moved from a position of rest in the body to an active position by exposure to pressure of the drilling fluid flowing through the body. The blades in these reamers are initially retracted to permit the tool to be run through the borehole on a drill string and once the tool has passed beyond the end of the casing, the blades are extended so the bore diameter may be increased below the casing.
The blades of conventional expandable reamers have been sized to minimize a clearance between themselves and the tubular body in order to prevent any drilling mud and earth fragments from becoming lodged in the clearance and binding the blade against the tubular body. The blades of these conventional expandable reamers utilize pressure from inside the tool to apply force radially outward against pistons which move the blades, carrying cutting elements, laterally outward. It is felt by some that the nature of the conventional reamers allows misaligned forces to cock and jam the pistons and blades, preventing the springs from retracting the blades laterally inward. Also, designs of these conventional expandable reamer assemblies fail to help blade retraction when jammed and pulled upward against the borehole casing. Furthermore, some conventional hydraulically actuated reamers utilize expensive seals disposed around a very complex shaped and expensive piston, or blade, carrying cutting elements. In order to prevent cocking, some conventional reamers are designed having the piston shaped oddly in order to try to avoid the supposed cocking, requiring matching, complex seal configurations. These seals are feared to possibly leak after extended usage.
Other conventional reamers require very close tolerances (such as six-thousandths of an inch (0.006″) in some areas) around the pistons or blades. Testing suggests that this may be a major contributor to the problem of the piston failing to retract the blades back into the tool, due to binding caused by particulate-laden drilling mud.
Notwithstanding the various prior approaches to drill and/or ream a larger diameter borehole below a smaller diameter borehole, the need exists for improved apparatus and methods for doing so. For instance, bi-center and reamer wing assemblies are limited in the sense that the pass-through diameter of such tools is nonadjustable and limited by the reaming diameter. Furthermore, conventional bi-center and eccentric bits may have the tendency to wobble and deviate from the path intended for the borehole. Conventional expandable reaming assemblies, while sometimes more stable than bi-center and eccentric bits, may be subject to damage when passing through a smaller diameter borehole or casing section, may be prematurely actuated, and may present difficulties in removal from the borehole after actuation.
Accordingly, there is an ongoing desire to improve or extend performance of an expandable reamer apparatus regardless of the subterranean formation type being drilled. There is a further desire to provide a reamer apparatus that provides failsafe blade retraction, is robustly designed with conventional seal or sleeve configurations, and may not require sensitive tolerances between moving parts.
In order to prevent, or at least substantially eliminate jamming of the blades carrying cutting elements for enlarging a bore hole, an apparatus is provided in at least one embodiment of the invention having blades configured to slide up a track in the body of the apparatus, enabling higher forces to open the blades of the apparatus to achieve a fully extended position without damage or binding, while allowing the blades to be retracted directly along the track.
In other embodiments of the invention, an expandable reamer apparatus for drilling a subterranean formation is provided that includes a tubular body, one or more blades positionally coupled to the track of the tubular body, a push sleeve and a drilling fluid flow path extending through the tubular body for conducting drilling fluid therethrough. The tubular body includes a longitudinal axis, an inner bore, an outer surface, and at least one track communicating through the tubular body between the inner bore and the outer surface, the track exhibiting a slope at an acute angle to the longitudinal axis. The one or more blades each include at least one cutting element configured and oriented to remove material from the wall of a bore hole of a subterranean formation to enlarge the borehole diameter responsive to rotation of the apparatus. The push sleeve is positionally coupled to the inner bore of the tubular body and coupled to at least one blade so as to be configured to selectively allow communication of drilling fluid passing through the tubular body to effect axial movement thereof responsive to a force or pressure of drilling fluid so as to transition the at least one blade along the track from a retracted position into an extended position for reaming.
Other embodiments of the expandable reamer apparatus are provided.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming that which is regarded as the invention, various features and advantages of this invention may be more readily ascertained from the following description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The illustrations presented herein are, in some instances, not actual views of any particular reamer tool, cutting element, or other feature of a reamer tool, but are merely idealized representations that are employed to describe the present invention. Additionally, elements common between figures may retain the same numerical designation.
An expandable reamer apparatus 100 according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in
Three sliding cutter blocks or blades 101, 102, 103 (see
Referring to
The expandable reamer apparatus 100 includes a shear assembly 150 for retaining the expandable reamer apparatus 100 in the initial position by securing the traveling sleeve 128 toward the upper end 191 thereof. Reference may also be made to
With reference to
Shock absorbing member 125 may comprise a flexible or compliant material, such as, for instance, an elastomer or other polymer. In one embodiment, shock absorbing member 125 may comprise a nitrile rubber. Utilizing a shock absorbing member 125 between the traveling sleeve 128 and seal sleeve 126 may reduce or prevent deformation of at least one of the raveling sleeve 128 and seal sleeve 126 that may otherwise occur due to impact therebetween.
It should be noted that any sealing elements or shock absorbing members disclosed herein that are included within expandable reamer apparatus 100 may comprise any suitable material as known in the art, such as, for instance, a polymer or elastomer. Optionally, a material comprising a sealing element may be selected for relatively high temperature (e.g., about 400° Fahrenheit or greater) use. For instance, seals may be comprised of TEFLON™, polyetheretherketone (PEEK™) material, a polymer material, or an elastomer, or may comprise a metal-to-metal seal suitable for expected borehole conditions. Specifically, any sealing element or shock absorbing member disclosed herein, such as shock absorbing member 125 and seals 134 and 135, discussed hereinabove, or sealing elements, such as seal 136 discussed herein below, or other sealing elements included by an expandable reamer apparatus of the invention may comprise a material configured for relatively high temperature use, as well as for use in highly corrosive borehole environments.
The seal sleeve 126 includes an O-ring seal 136 sealing it between the inner bore 151 of the tubular body 108, and a T-seal seal 137 sealing it between the outer bore 162 of the traveling sleeve 128, which completes fluid sealing between the traveling sleeve 128 and the nozzle intake port 164. Furthermore, the seal sleeve 126 axially aligns, guides and supports the traveling sleeve 128 within the tubular body 108. Moreover, the seal sleeve seals 136 and 137 may also prevent hydraulic fluid from leaking from within the expandable reamer apparatus 100 to outside the expandable reamer apparatus 100 by way of the nozzle intake port 164 prior to the traveling sleeve 128 being released from its initial position.
A downhole end 165 of the traveling sleeve 128 (also see
The dogs 166 are positionally retained between an annular groove 167 in the inner bore 151 of the tubular body 108 and the seat stop sleeve 130. Each dog 166 of the lowlock sleeve 117 is a collet or locking dog latch having an expandable detent 168 that may engage the groove 167 of the tubular body 108 when compressively engaged by the seat stop sleeve 130. The dogs 166 hold the lowlock sleeve 117 in place and prevent the push sleeve 115 from moving in the uphole direction 159 until the “end” or seat stop sleeve 130, with its larger outer diameter 169, travels beyond the lowlock sleeve 117 allowing the dogs 166 to retract axially inward toward the smaller outer diameter 170 of the traveling sleeve 128. When the dogs 166 retract axially inward they may be disengaged from the groove 167 of the tubular body 108, allowing the push sleeve 115 to move responsive to hydraulic pressure primarily in the axial direction, i.e., in the uphole direction 159.
The shear assembly 150 requires an affirmative act, such as introducing a ball or other restriction element into the expandable reamer apparatus 100 to cause the pressure from hydraulic fluid flow to increase, before the shear screws 127 will shear.
The downhole end 165 of the traveling sleeve 128 includes within its inner bore a ball trap sleeve 129 that includes a plug 131. An O-ring seal 139 may also provide a seal between the ball trap sleeve 129 and the plug 131. A restriction element in the form of a ball 147 (
Optionally, the ball 147 used to activate the expandable reamer apparatus 100 may engage the ball trap sleeve 129 and the plug 131 that include malleable characteristics, such that the ball 147 may swage therein as it seats in order to prevent the ball 147 from moving around and potentially causing problems or damage to the expandable reamer apparatus 100.
Also, in order to support the traveling sleeve 128 and mitigate vibration effects after the traveling sleeve 128 is axially retained, the seat stop sleeve 130 and the downhole end 165 of the traveling sleeve 128 are retained in a stabilizer sleeve 122. Reference may also be made to
After the traveling sleeve 128 travels sufficiently far enough to allow the dogs 166 of the lowlock sleeve 117 to be disengaged from the groove 167 of the tubular body 108, the dogs 166 of the lowlock sleeve 117 being connected to the push sleeve 115 may all move in the uphole direction 159. Reference may also be made to
The push sleeve 115 includes at its uphole section 176 a yoke 114 coupled thereto as shown in
In order that the blades 101, 102, 103 may transition between the extended and retracted positions, they are each positionally coupled to one of the blade tracks 148 in the tubular body 108 as particularly shown in
Advantageously, the natural, reactive forces acting on the cutting elements 104 on the blades 101, 102, 103 during rotation of expandable reamer apparatus 100 in engaging a formation while reaming a bore hole may help to further push the blades 101, 102, 103 in the extended outward direction, holding them with this force in their fully outward or extended position. Drilling forces acting on the cutting elements 104, therefore, along with higher pressure within expandable reamer apparatus 100 creating a pressure differential with that of the borehole exterior to the tool, help to further hold the blades 101, 102, 103 in the extended or outward position. Also, as the expandable reamer apparatus 100 is drilling, the fluid pressure may be reduced when the combination of the slope 180 of the blade tracks 148 is sufficiently shallow allowing the reactive forces acting on the cutting elements 104 to offset the biasing effect of the biasing spring 116. In this regard, application of hydraulic fluid pressure may be substantially minimized while drilling as a mechanical advantage allows the reactive forces acting on the cutting elements 104 when coupled with the substantially more shallow slanted slope 180 of the tracks 148 to provide the requisite reaction force for retaining the blades 101, 102, 103 in their extended position. Conventional reamers having blades extending substantially laterally outward from an extent of 35 degree or greater (referenced to the longitudinal axis) require the full, and continued, application of hydraulic pressure to maintain the blades in an extended position. Accordingly, and unlike the case with conventional expandable reamers, the blades 101, 102, 103 of expandable reamer apparatus 100 have a tendency to open as opposed to tending to close when reaming a bore hole. The direction of the net cutting force and, thus, of the reactive force may be adjusted by altering the backrake, exposure and siderake of the cutters or cutting elements 104 to better achieve a net force tending to move the blades 101, 102, 103 to their fullest outward extent.
Another advantage of a so-called “shallow track,” i.e., the substantially small slope 180 having an acute angle, is greater spring force retraction efficiency. Improved retraction efficiency enables improved or customized spring rates to be utilized to control the extent of the biasing force by the spring 116, such as selecting the biasing force required to be overcome by hydraulic pressure to begin to move or fully extend the blades 101, 102, 103. Also, with improved retraction efficiency, greater assurance of blade retraction is assured when the hydraulic fluid pressure is removed from the expandable reamer apparatus 100. Optionally, the spring 116 may be preloaded when the expandable reamer apparatus 100 is in the initial or retracted positions, allowing a minimal amount of retraction force to be constantly applied.
Another advantage provided by the blade tracks 148 is the unitary design of each “dovetail shaped” groove 179, there being one groove 179 for receiving one of the oppositely opposed “dovetailed shaped” rails 181 of the guides 187 on each side of the blades 101, 102, 103. In conventional expandable reamers, each side of a movable blade include a plurality of ribs or channels for being received into opposing channels or ribs of the reamer body, respectively, such arrangements being highly prone to binding when the blades are subjected to operational forces and pressures. In addition to ease of blade extension and retraction without binding along or in the track 148, the single rail and cooperating groove design provides non-binding structural support for blade operation, particularly when engaging a formation while reaming.
In addition to the upper stabilizer block 105, the expandable reamer apparatus 100 also includes a mid stabilizer block 106 and a lower stabilizer block 107. Optionally, the mid stabilizer block 106 and the lower stabilizer block 107 may be combined into a unitary stabilizer block. The stabilizer blocks 105, 106, 107 help to center the expandable reamer apparatus 100 in the drill hole while being run into position through a casing or liner string and also while drilling and reaming the borehole. As mentioned above, the upper stabilizer block 105 may be used to stop or limit the forward motion of the blades 101, 102, 103, determining the extent to which the blades 101, 102, 103 may engage a bore hole while drilling. The upper stabilizer block 105, in addition to providing a back stop for limiting the lateral extent of the blades, may provide for additional stability when the blades 101, 102, 103 are retracted and the expandable reamer apparatus 100 of a drill string is positioned within a bore hole in an area where an expanded hole is not desired while the drill string is rotating.
Advantageously, the upper stabilizer block 105 may be mounted, removed and/or replaced by a technician, particularly in the field, allowing the extent to which the blades 101, 102, 103 engage the bore hole to be readily increased or decreased to a different extent than illustrated. Optionally, it is recognized that a stop associated on a track side of the block 105 may be customized in order to arrest the extent to which the blades 101, 102, 103 may laterally extend when fully positioned to the extended position along the blade tracks 148. The stabilizer blocks 105, 106, 107 may include hard faced bearing pads (not shown) to provide a surface for contacting a wall of a bore hole while stabilizing the apparatus therein during a drilling operation.
Also, the expandable reamer apparatus 100 may include tungsten carbide nozzles 110 as shown in
The expandable reaming apparatus, or reamer, 100 is now described in terms of its operational aspects. Reference may be made to
Referring to
Thereafter, as illustrated in
Referring to
As reaming takes place with the expandable reamer apparatus 100, the lower and mid hard face pads 106, 107 help to stabilize the tubular body 108 as the cutting elements 104 of the blades 101, 102, 103 ream a larger borehole and the upper hard face pads 105 also help to stabilize the top of the expandable reamer 100 when the blades 101, 102 and 103 are in the retracted position.
After the traveling sleeve 128 with the ball 147 moves downward, it comes to a stop with the flow bypass or fluid ports 173 located above the ball 147 in the traveling sleeve 128 exiting against the inside wall 184 of the hard faced protect sleeve 121, which helps to prevent or minimize erosion damage from drilling fluid flow impinging thereupon. The drilling fluid flow may then continue down the bottom-hole assembly, and the upper end of the traveling sleeve 128 becomes “trapped,” i.e., locked, between the ears 163 of the uplock sleeve 124 and the shock absorbing member 125 of the seal sleeve 126 and the lower end of the traveling sleeve 128 is laterally stabilized by the stabilizer sleeve 122.
When drilling fluid pressure is released, the spring 116 will help drive the lowlock sleeve 117 and the push sleeve 115 with the attached blades 101, 102, 103 back downwardly and inwardly substantially to their original or initial position into the retracted position, see
Whenever drilling fluid flow is reestablished in the drill pipe and through the expandable reamer apparatus 100, the push sleeve 115 with the yoke 114 and blades 101, 102, 103 may move upward with the blades 101, 102, 103 following the ramps or tracks 148 to again cut/ream the prescribed larger diameter in a bore hole. Whenever drilling fluid flow is stopped, i.e., the differential pressure falls below the restoring force of the spring 116, the blades 101, 102, 103 retract, as described above, via the spring 116.
In aspects of the invention, the expandable reamer apparatus 100 overcomes disadvantages of conventional reamers. For example, one conventional hydraulic reamer utilized pressure from inside the tool to apply force against cutter pistons which moved radially outward. It is felt by some that the nature of the conventional reamer allowed misaligned forces to cock and jam the pistons, preventing the springs from retracting them. By providing the expandable reamer apparatus 100 that slides each of the blades up a relatively shallow-angled ramp, higher drilling forces may be used to open and extend the blades to their maximum position while transferring the forces through to the upper hard face pad stop with no damage thereto and subsequently allowing the spring to retract the blades thereafter without jamming or cocking.
The expandable reamer apparatus 100 includes blades that, if not retracted by the spring, will be pushed down the ramp of the track by contact with the borehole wall and the casing and allow the expandable reamer apparatus 100 to be pulled through the casing, providing a kind of failsafe function.
The expandable reamer apparatus 100 is not sealed around the blades and does not require seals thereon, such as the expensive or custom made seals used in some conventional expandable reamers.
The expandable reamer apparatus 100 includes clearances of ranging from 0.010 of an inch to 0.030 of an inch between adjacent parts having dynamic seals therebetween. The dynamic seals are all conventional, circular seals. Moreover, the sliding mechanism or actuating means, which includes the blades in the tracks, includes clearances ranging from 0.050 of an inch to 0.100 of an inch, particularly about the dovetail portions. Clearances in the expandable reamer apparatus, the blades and the tracks may vary to a somewhat greater extent or a lesser extent than indicated herein. The larger clearances and tolerances of the parts of expandable reamer apparatus 100 promote ease of operation, particularly with a reduced likelihood of binding caused by particulates in the drilling fluid and formation debris cut from the borehole wall.
Additional aspects of the expandable reamer apparatus 100 are now provided:
The blade 101 may be held in place along the track 148 (shown in
The blades 101, 102, 103 are attached to a yoke 114 with the linkage assembly, as described herein, which allow the blades 101, 102, 103 to move upward and radially outward along the 10 degree ramp, in this embodiment of the invention, as the actuating means, i.e., the yoke 114 and push sleeve 115, moves axially upward. The link of the linkage assembly is pinned to both the blocks and the yoke in a similar fashion. The linkage assembly, in addition to allowing the actuating means to directly extend and retract the blades 101, 102, 103 substantially in the longitudinal or axial direction, enables the upward and radially outward extension of the blades 101, 102, 103 by rotating through an angle, approximately 48 degrees in this embodiment of the invention, during the direct actuation of the actuating means and the blades 101, 102, 103.
In case the blades 101, 102, 103 somehow do not readily move back down the ramp of the blade tracks 148 under biasing force from the retraction spring 116, then as the expandable reamer apparatus 100 is pulled from the bore hole, contact with the bore hole wall will bump the blades 101, 102, 103 down the slope 180 of the tracks 148. If needed, the blades 101, 102, 103 of the expandable reamer apparatus 100 may be pulled up against the casing which may push the blades 101, 102, 103 further back into the retracted position thereby allowing access and removal of the expandable reamer apparatus 100 through the casing.
In other embodiments of the invention, the traveling sleeve may be sealed to prevent fluid flow from exiting the tool through the blade passage ports 182, and after triggering, the seal may be maintained.
The nozzles 110, as mentioned above, may be directed in the direction of flow through the expandable reamer apparatus 100 from within the tubular body 108 downward and outward radially to the annulus between tubular body 108 and a bore hole. Directing the nozzles 110 in such a downward direction causes counterflow as the flow exits the nozzle and mixes with the annular moving counter flow returning up the bore hole and may improve blade cleaning and cuttings removal. The nozzles 110 are directed at the cutters of the blades 101, 102, 103 for maximum cleaning, and may be directionally optimized using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis.
The expandable reamer apparatus 100 may include a lower saver sub 109 shown in
Still other aspects of the expandable reamer apparatus 100 are now provided:
The shear screws 127 of the shear assembly 150, retaining the traveling sleeve 128 and the uplock sleeve 124 in the initial position, are used to provide or create a trigger, releasing when pressure builds to a predetermined value. The predetermined value at which the shear screws shear under drilling fluid pressure within expandable reamer apparatus 100 may be 1000 psi, for example, or even 2000 psi. It is recognized that the pressure may range to a greater or lesser extent than presented herein to trigger the expandable reamer apparatus 100. Optionally, it is recognized that a great pressure at which the shear screws 127 shears may be provided to allow the spring element 116 to be conditionally configured and biased to a greater extent in order to further provide desired assurance of blade retraction upon release of hydraulic fluid.
Optionally, one or more of the blades 101, 102, 103 may be replaced with stabilizer blocks having guides and rails as described herein for being received into grooves 179 of the track 148 in the expandable reamer apparatus 100, which may be used as expandable concentric stabilizer rather than a reamer, which may further be utilized in a drill string with other concentric reamers or eccentric reamers.
Optionally, the blades 101, 102, 103 may each include one row or three or more rows of cutting elements 104 rather than the two rows of cutting elements 104 shown in
The measurement device 20 may be part of a nuclear based measurement system such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,175,429 to Hall et al., the disclosure of which is fully incorporated herein by reference, and is assigned to the assignee of the invention herein disclosed. The measurement device 20 may also include sonic calipers, proximity sensors, or other sensors suitable for determining a distance between a wall of a bore hole and the expandable reamer apparatus 10. Optionally, the measurement device 20 may be configured, mounted and used to determine the position of the movable blades and/or bearing pads of the expandable reamer apparatus 20, wherein the reamed minimum borehole diameter may be inferred from such measurements. Similarly, a measurement device may be positioned within the movable blade so as to be in contact with or proximate to the formation on the borehole wall when the movable blade is actuated to its outermost fullest extent.
As shown in
While the motion limiting members 210 and 220 (shown in
In other embodiments, the motion limiting members 210 or 220 may be simple structures for limiting the extent to which the actuating means may extend to limit the motion of the blades. For example, a motion limiting member may be a cylinder that floats within the space between the outer surface of the push sleeve 115 and the inner bore 151 of the tubular body 108 either between the spring 116 and the push sleeve 115 or the spring 116 and the tubular body 108.
The expandable reamer apparatus 100, as described above with reference to
In another aspect of the invention, the expandable reamer apparatus 100 drives the actuating means, i.e., the push sleeve, axially in a first direction while forcing the blades to move to the extended position (the blades being directly coupled to the push sleeve by a yoke and linkage assembly). In the opposite direction, the push sleeve directly retracts the blades by pulling, via the yoke and linkage assembly. Thus, activation means provides for the direct extension and retraction of the blades, irrespective of the biasing spring or the hydraulic fluid as conventionally provided.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention only be limited in terms of the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/872,744, filed Dec. 4, 2006, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/949,405, filed Dec. 3, 2007, entitled Restriction Element Trap for Use with an Actuation Element of a Downhole Apparatus and Method of Use, pending; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/058,384, filed Mar. 28, 2008, entitled Stabilizer and Reamer System Having Extensible Blades and Bearing Pads and Method of Using Same, pending; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/433,939, filed May 1, 2009, entitled Stabilizer and Reamer System Having Extensible Blades and Bearing Pads and Method of Using Same, pending; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/501,688, filed Jul. 13, 2009, entitled Stabilizer Ribs on Lower Side of Expandable Reamer Apparatus to Reduce Operating Vibration, pending; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/715,610, filed Mar. 2, 2010, entitled Chip Deflector on a Blade of a Downhole Reamer and Methods Therefore, pending, each of which is assigned to the Assignee of the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1548578 | Blanchard | Aug 1925 | A |
1678075 | Phipps | Jul 1928 | A |
1772710 | Denney | Aug 1930 | A |
1804850 | Triplett | May 1931 | A |
2069482 | Seay | Feb 1937 | A |
2177721 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1939 | A |
2344598 | Church | Mar 1944 | A |
2758819 | Kammerer, Jr. et al. | Aug 1956 | A |
2799479 | Kammerer | Jul 1957 | A |
2882019 | Carr et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
3105562 | Stone et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3123162 | Rowley | Mar 1964 | A |
3126065 | Chadderdon | Mar 1964 | A |
3211232 | Grimmer | Oct 1965 | A |
3220481 | Park | Nov 1965 | A |
3224507 | Cordary et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3320004 | Garrett | May 1967 | A |
3332498 | Page, Jr. | Jul 1967 | A |
3433313 | Brown | Mar 1969 | A |
3753471 | Kammerer, Jr. et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3845815 | Garwood | Nov 1974 | A |
3916998 | Bass, Jr. et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
4055226 | Weber | Oct 1977 | A |
4111262 | Duncan | Sep 1978 | A |
4304311 | Shinn | Dec 1981 | A |
4440222 | Pullin | Apr 1984 | A |
4456080 | Holbert | Jun 1984 | A |
4458761 | Van Vreeswyk | Jul 1984 | A |
4540941 | Walkow | Sep 1985 | A |
4565252 | Campbell et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4635738 | Schillinger et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4660657 | Furse et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4711326 | Baugh et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4842083 | Raney | Jun 1989 | A |
4877092 | Helm et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4889197 | Boe | Dec 1989 | A |
5139098 | Blake | Aug 1992 | A |
5175429 | Hall, Jr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5211241 | Mashaw, Jr. et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211541 | Fledderjohn et al. | May 1993 | A |
5265684 | Rosenhauch | Nov 1993 | A |
5293945 | Rosenbauch et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305833 | Collins | Apr 1994 | A |
5318131 | Baker | Jun 1994 | A |
5318137 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5318138 | Dewey et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5332048 | Underwood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343963 | Bouldin et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5368114 | Tandberg et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5375662 | Echols, III et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5402856 | Warren et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5402859 | Boberg et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413180 | Ross et al. | May 1995 | A |
5437308 | Morin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443129 | Bailey et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5495899 | Pastusek et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5497842 | Pastusek et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5518073 | Manke et al. | May 1996 | A |
5558162 | Manke et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560440 | Tibbitts | Oct 1996 | A |
5647437 | Braddick et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5740864 | De Hoedt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746274 | Voll et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765653 | Doster et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788000 | Maury et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5823254 | Dobson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5853054 | McGarian et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862870 | Hutchinson | Jan 1999 | A |
5957223 | Doster et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5992518 | Whitlock | Nov 1999 | A |
6059051 | Jewkes et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070677 | Johnston, Jr. | Jun 2000 | A |
RE36817 | Pastusek et al. | Aug 2000 | E |
6131662 | Ross | Oct 2000 | A |
6131675 | Anderson | Oct 2000 | A |
6179066 | Nasr et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6213226 | Eppink et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227312 | Eppink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6289999 | Dewey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325151 | Vincent et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328117 | Berzas et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6360831 | Akesson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378632 | Dewey et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6494272 | Eppink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499537 | Dewey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6615933 | Eddison | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6651756 | Costo, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6668936 | Williamson, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668949 | Rives | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6695080 | Presley et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702020 | Zachman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6732817 | Dewey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6739416 | Presley et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6880650 | Hoffmaster et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886633 | Fanuel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6920930 | Allamon et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920944 | Eppink et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6991046 | Fielder et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021389 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036611 | Radford et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048078 | Dewey et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7069775 | Fredette et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083010 | Eppink et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100713 | Tulloch | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7234542 | Vail, III | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7252163 | Ollerenshaw et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7287603 | Hay et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293616 | Tulloch | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308937 | Radford et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314099 | Dewey et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325630 | Takhaundinov et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7451836 | Hoffmaster et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7493971 | Nevlud et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506703 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513318 | Underwood et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549485 | Radford et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7658241 | Lassoie et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20030029644 | Hoffmaster et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030155155 | Dewey et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040134687 | Radford et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040222022 | Nevlud et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050145417 | Radford et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050241856 | Lassoie et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050274546 | Fanuel et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284659 | Hall et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060113113 | Underwood et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060118339 | Takhaundinov et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060124317 | Telfer | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144623 | Ollerensaw et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060207801 | Clayton | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060249307 | Ritter et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070017708 | Radford et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070089912 | Eddison et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070163808 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080105464 | Radford | May 2008 | A1 |
20080110678 | Radford et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128169 | Radford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080128174 | Radford et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090145666 | Radford et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090242277 | Radford et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0594420 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0594420 | Apr 1994 | EP |
1188898 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1 614 852 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2420803 | Jun 2006 | GB |
2393461 | Oct 2006 | GB |
2426269 | Feb 2007 | GB |
2172385 | Mar 2000 | RU |
2007017651 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080128175 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60872744 | Dec 2006 | US |