The field of the invention is rings that are expanded with a tubular into a surrounding tubular for support.
Strings of tubulars are frequently supported from surrounding tubulars already run into the wellbore. One way to do that is to set a packer with slips that bite the surrounding tubular and a seal assembly to seal the annular space. Another way to do this is to expand the smaller tubular into a larger surrounding tubular into which it has been run. When so doing, a slip ring delivered on the smaller tubular is employed. As the smaller tubular is expanded, the slip ring is expanded as well until the slip ring contacts the surrounding tubular. At that time the slip ring can get a bite into the surrounding tubular to enhance the connection and to increase the support capacity of the connection.
Prior slip ring designs involved cylindrical shapes that were an open undulating structure of spaced axially oriented elements connected at their opposed ends and defining axially oriented gaps on either side of the axially oriented elements. This made the resulting structure very flexible. It was considered that flexibility was desired in that the resistance to expansion when the tubular within was expanded was kept to a minimum. While that was true, there were other issues with such a design. One issue was structural integrity during storage, when no pipe extended through the slip ring, and later on when running the slip ring into the well on a tubular. The built in flexibility of the prior design proved to be a detriment in those situations. The slip ring could be easily deformed in storage or during run in due to it flexible shape. Another issue was the behavior of the slip ring during expansion. Due the flexible nature of the design, as the tubular inside was expanded with a swage the growth in dimension of the slip ring was irregular resulting in unsymmetrical contact with the surrounding tubular as the swage was advanced. A swage can also be any cone or likewise device designed for expanding a tubular. This tendency of irregular expansion decreased the support capability of the connection after expansion and in extreme situations prevented a fluid tight connection from occurring.
Accordingly what is needed is a slip ring design that is stronger without unduly increasing the expansion force in a tubular that it surrounds while at the same time having more predictable expansion characteristics to enhance the quality and/or capacity of the attachment. These and other features will be described in greater detail in the discussion of the preferred embodiment below as further explained by the associated figures with the appended claims defining the scope of the invention.
An example of flexible rings that can contract due to compression of axial notches is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,299,644. Another example of a notched anchor ring that is intended to break into segments at the onset of expansion is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,793,022.
An expandable slip ring is used to secure attachment of an expanded tubular to a surrounding tubular. It features elongated generally axially oriented openings separated by narrow segments. As a swage is advanced within a tubular that has the slip ring outside it the narrow segments or tabs expand and can break but the ring is still held to its shape as the expansion progresses due to the integrity of other tabs that can subsequently break as the swage advances within the tubular that is surrounded by the slip ring. The integrity of the slip ring is enhanced for storage and run in while the expansion characteristics are more uniform as the ring retains some structural integrity during much of the expansion process.
The overall structure is sounder than the prior designs described above when the slip ring 10 is in storage and not mounted to a tubular or when it is on a tubular and run in the hole. As a result, it is less likely to deform or get damages in storage or during run in. Whereas the prior designs provided resistance to hoop stresses circumferentially only near the opposed ends and only on an alternating basis at opposed ends of elongated elements, the design of
Other alternatives are seen in
While the breaking of the narrow segments 34, 30, 38 and 40 during expansion is contemplated, an elongation without physical disconnection at some to all of said locations is also possible as an alternative. In this respect, the material will stretch within its elastic limit and could experience some plastic deformation short of a physical break.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4311196 | Beall et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4440223 | Akkerman | Apr 1984 | A |
5299644 | Eckert | Apr 1994 | A |
6454493 | Lohbeck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6715560 | Doane et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722427 | Gano et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6793022 | Vick et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7086476 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7306034 | Garcia | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7341110 | Doane et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7387170 | Doane et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7493945 | Doane et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9842947 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9923354 | May 1999 | WO |
02075107 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2005005772 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080047704 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |