Expandable tubing and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE45244
  • Patent Number
    RE45,244
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 31, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2014
    10 years ago
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • 166 380000
    • 166 382000
    • 166 207000
    • 166 227000
  • International Classifications
    • E21B43/10
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
Abstract
An apparatus suitable for use in a wellbore comprises an expandable bistable device. An exemplary device has a plurality of bistable cells formed into a tubular shape. Each bistable cell comprises at least two elongated members that are connected to each other at their ends. The device is stable in a first configuration and a second configuration.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to equipment that can be used in the drilling and completion of wellbores in an underground formation and in the production of fluids from such wells.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Fluids such as oil, natural gas and water are obtained from a subterranean geologic formation (a “reservoir”) by drilling a well that penetrates the fluid-hearing formation. Once the well has been drilled to a certain depth the borehole wall must be supported to prevent collapse. Conventional well drilling methods involve the installation of a casing string and cementing between the casing and the borehole to provide support for the borehole structure. After cementing a casing string in place, the drilling to greater depths can commence. After each subsequent casing string is installed, the next drill bit must pass through the inner diameter of the casing. In this manner each change in casing requires a reduction in the borehole diameter. This repeated reduction in the borehole diameter creates a need for very large initial borehole diameters to permit a reasonable pipe diameter at the depth where the wellbore penetrates the producing formation. The need for larger boreholes and multiple casing strings results in more time, material and expense being used than if a uniform size borehole could be drilled from the surface to the producing formation.


Various methods have been developed to stabilize or complete uncased boreholes. U.S. Pat. No. 5,348,095 to Worrall et al. discloses a method involving the radial expansion of a casing string to a configuration with a larger diameter. Very large forces are needed to impart the radial deformation desired in this method. In an effort to decrease the forces needed to expand the casing string, methods that involve expanding a liner that has longitudinal slots cut into it have been proposed (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,366,012 and 5,667,011). These methods involve the radial deformation of the slotted liner into a configuration with an increased diameter by running an expansion mandrel through the slotted liner. These methods still require significant amounts of force to be applied throughout the entire length of the slotted liner.


A problem sometimes encountered while drilling a well is the loss of drilling fluids into subterranean zones. The loss of drilling fluids usually leads to increased expenses but can result in a borehole collapse and a costly “fishing” job to recover the drill string or other tools that were in the well. Various additives are commonly used within the drilling fluids to help seal off loss circulation zones, such as cottonseed hulls or synthetic fibers.


Once a well is put in production an influx of sand from the producing formation can lead to undesired fill within the wellbore and can damage valves and other production related equipment. Many methods have been attempted for sand control.


The present invention is directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of one or more of the problems set forth above, and can be useful in other applications as well.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention, a technique is provided for use of an expandable bistable device in a borehole. The bistable device is stable in a first contracted configuration and a second expanded configuration. An exemplary device is generally tubular, having a larger diameter in the expanded configuration than in the contracted configuration. The technique also may utilize a conveyance mechanism able to transport the bistable device to a location in a subterranean borehole. Furthermore, the bistable device can be constructed in various configurations for a variety of applications.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:



FIGS. 1A and 1B are illustrations of the forces imposed to make a bistable structure;



FIGS. 2A and 2B show force-deflection curves of two bistable structures;



FIGS. 3A-3F illustrate expanded and collapsed states of three bistable cells with various thickness ratios;



FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate a bistable expandable tubular in its expanded and collapsed states;



FIGS. 4C and 4D illustrate a bistable expandable tubular in collapsed and expanded states within a wellbore;



FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate an expandable packer type of deployment device;



FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate a mechanical packer type of deployment device;



FIGS. 7A-7D illustrate an expandable swage type of deployment device;



FIGS. 8A-8D illustrate a piston type of deployment device;



FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate a plug type of deployment device;



FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate a ball type of deployment device;



FIG. 11 is a schematic of a wellbore utilizing an expandable bistable tubular;



FIG. 12 illustrates a motor driven radial roller deployment device; and



FIG. 13 illustrates a hydraulically driven radial roller deployment device.



FIG. 14 illustrates a bistable expandable tubular having a wrapping;



FIG. 14A is a view similar to FIG. 14 in which the wrapping comprises a screen;



FIG. 14B is a view similar to FIG. 14 showing another alternate embodiment;



FIG. 14C is a view similar to FIG. 14 showing another alternate embodiment;



FIG. 14D is a view similar to FIG. 14 showing another alternate embodiment;



FIG. 14E is a view similar to FIG. 14 showing another alternate embodiment;



FIG. 15 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 15A is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 16 is a partial perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 17A-B are a partial perspective view and a partial cross-sectional end view respectively of an alternative embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 18 is a partial cross-sectional end view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention.





While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Bistable devices used in the present invention can take advantage of a principle illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B. FIG. 1A shows a rod 10 fixed at each end to rigid supports 12. If the rod 10 is subjected to an axial force it begins to deform as shown in FIG. 1B. As the axial force is increased rod 10 ultimately reaches its Euler buckling limit and deflects to one of the two stable positions shown as 14 and 15. If the buckled rod is now clamped in the buckled position, a force at right angles to the long axis can cause the rod to move to either of the stable positions but to no other position. When the rod is subjected to a lateral force it must move through an angle β before deflecting to its new stable position.


Bistable systems are characterized by a force deflection curve such as those shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. The externally applied force 16 causes the rod 10 of FIG. 1B to move in the direction X and reaches a maximum 18 at the onset of shifting from one stable configuration to the other. Further deflection requires less force because the system now has a negative spring rate and when the force becomes zero the deflection to the second stable position is spontaneous.


The force deflection curve for this example is symmetrical and is illustrated in FIG. 2A. By introducing either a precurvature to the rod or an asymmetric cross section the force deflection curve can be made asymmetric as shown in FIG. 2B. In this system the force 19 required to cause the rod to assume one stable position is greater than the force 20 required to cause the reverse deflection. The force 20 must be greater than zero for the system to have bistable characteristics.


Bistable structures, sometimes referred to as toggle devices, have been used in industry for such devices as flexible discs, over center clamps, hold-down devices and quick release systems for tension cables (such as in sailboat rigging backstays).


Instead of using the rigid supports as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, a cell can be constructed where the restraint is provided by curved struts connected at each end as shown in FIGS. 3A-3F. If both struts 21 and 22 have the same thickness as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the force deflection curve is linear and the cell lengthens when compressed from its open position FIG. 3B to its closed position FIG. 3A. If the cell struts have different thicknesses, as shown in FIGS. 3C-3F, the cell has the force deflection characteristics shown in FIG. 2B, and does not change in length when it moves between its two stable positions. An expandable bistable tubular can thus be designed so that as the radial dimension expands, the axial length remains constant. In one example, if the thickness ratio is over approximately 2:1, the heavier strut resists longitudinal changes. By changing the ratio of thick-to-thin strut dimensions, the opening and closing forces can be changed. For example, FIGS. 3C and 3D illustrated a thickness ratio of approximately 3:1, and FIGS. 3E and 3F illustrate a thickness ratio of approximately 6:1.


An expandable bore bistable tubular, such as casing, a tube, a patch, or pipe, can be constructed with a series of circumferential bistable connected cells 23 as shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, where each thin strut 21 is connected to a thick strut 22. The longitudinal flexibility of such a tubular can be modified by changing the length of the cells and by connecting each row of cells with a compliant link. Further, the force deflection characteristics and the longitudinal flexibility can also be altered by the design of the cell shape. FIG. 4A illustrates an expandable bistable tubular 24 in its expanded configuration while FIG. 4B illustrates the expandable bistable tubular 24 in its contracted or collapsed configuration. Within this application the term “collapsed” is used to identify the configuration of the bistable element or device in the stable state with the smallest diameter, it is not meant to imply that the element or device is damaged in any way. In the collapsed state, bistable tubular 24 is readily introduced into a wellbore 29, as illustrated in FIG. 4C. Upon placement of the bistable tubular 24 at a desired wellbore location, it is expanded, as illustrated in FIG. 4D.


The geometry of the bistable cells is such that the tubular cross-section can be expanded in the radial direction to increase the overall diameter of the tubular. As the tubular expands radially, the bistable cells deform elastically until a specific geometry is reached. At this point the bistable cells move, e.g. snap, to a final expanded geometry. With some materials and/or bistable cell designs, enough energy can be released in the elastic deformation of the cell (as each bistable cell snaps past the specific geometry) that the expanding cells are able to initiate the expansion of adjoining bistable cells past the critical bistable cell geometry. Depending on the deflection curves, a portion or even an entire length of bistable expandable tubular can be expanded from a single point.


In like manner if radial compressive forces are exerted on an expanded bistable tubular, it contracts radially and the bistable cells deform elastically until a critical geometry is reached. At this point the bistable cells snap to a final collapsed structure. In this way the expansion of the bistable tubular is reversible and repeatable. Therefore the bistable tubular can be a reusable tool that is selectively changed between the expanded state as shown in FIG. 4A and the collapsed state as shown in FIG. 4B.


In the collapsed state, as in FIG. 4B, the bistable expandable tubular is easily inserted into the wellbore and placed into position. A deployment device is then used to change the configuration from the collapsed state to the expanded state.


In the expanded state, as in FIG. 4A, design control of the elastic material properties of each bistable cell can be such that a constant radial force can be applied by the tubular wall to the constraining wellbore surface. The material properties and the geometric shape of the bistable cells can be designed to give certain desired results.


One example of designing for certain desired results is an expandable bistable tubular string with more than one diameter throughout the length of the string. This can be useful in boreholes with varying diameters, whether designed that way or as a result of unplanned occurrences such as formation washouts or keyseats within the borehole. This also can be beneficial when it is desired to have a portion of the bistable expandable device located inside a cased section of the well while another portion is located in an uncased section of the well. FIG. 11 illustrates one example of this condition. A wellbore 40 is drilled from the surface 42 and comprises a cased section 44 and an openhole section 46. An expandable bistable device 48 having segments 50, 52 with various diameters is placed in the well. The segment with a larger diameter 50 is used to stabilize the openhole section 46 of the well, while the segment having a reduced diameter 52 is located inside the cased section 44 of the well.


Bistable collars or connectors 24A (see FIG. 4C) can be designed to allow sections of the bistable expandable tubular to be joined together into a string of useful lengths using the same principle as illustrated in FIG. 4A and 4B. This bistable connector 24A also incorporates a bistable cell design that allows it to expand radially using the same mechanism as for the bistable expandable tubular component. Exemplary bistable connectors have a diameter slightly larger than the expandable tubular sections that are being joined. The bistable connector is then placed over the ends of the two sections and mechanically attached to the expandable tubular sections. Mechanical fasteners such as screws, rivets or bands can be used to connect the connector to the tubular sections. The bistable connector typically is designed to have an expansion rate that is compatible with the expandable tubular sections, so that it continues to connect the two sections after the expansion of the two segments and the connector.


Alternatively, the bistable connector can have a diameter smaller than the two expandable tubular sections joined. Then, the connector is inserted inside of the ends of the tubulars and mechanically fastened as discussed above. Another embodiment would involve the machining of the ends of the tubular sections on either their inner or outer surfaces to form an annular recess in which the connector is located. A connector designed to fit into the recess is placed in the recess. The connector would then be mechanically attached to the ends as described above. In this way the connector forms a relatively flush-type connection with the tubular sections.


A conveyance device 31 transports the bistable expandable tubular lengths and bistable connectors into the wellbore and to the correct position. (See FIGS. 4C and 4D). The conveyance device may utilize one or more mechanisms such as wireline cable, coiled tubing, coiled tubing with wireline conductor, drill pipe, tubing or casing.


A deployment device 33 can be incorporated into the bottom hole assembly to expand the bistable expandable tubular and connectors. (See FIGS. 4C and 4D). Deployment devices can be of numerous types such as an inflatable packer element, a mechanical packer element, an expandable swage, a piston apparatus, a mechanical actuator, an electrical solenoid, a plug type apparatus, e.g. a conically shaped device pulled or pushed through the tubing, a ball type apparatus or a rotary type expander as further discussed below.


An inflatable packer element is shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B and is a device with an inflatable bladder, element, or bellows incorporated into the bistable expandable tubular system bottom hole assembly. In the illustration of FIG. 5A, the inflatable packer element 25 is located inside the entire length, or a portion, of the initial collapsed state bistable tubular 24 and any bistable expandable connectors (not shown). Once the bistable expandable tubular system is at the correct deployment depth, the inflatable packer element 25 is expanded radially by pumping fluid into the device as shown in FIG. 5B. The inflation fluid can be pumped from the surface through tubing or drill pipe, a mechanical pump, or via a downhole electrical pump which is powered via wireline cable. As the inflatable packer element 25 expands, it forces the bistable expandable tubular 24 to also expand radially. At a certain expansion diameter, the inflatable packer element causes the bistable cells in the tubular to reach a critical geometry where the bistable “snap” effect is initiated, and the bistable expandable tubular system expands to its final diameter. Finally the inflatable packer element 25 is deflated and removed from the deployed bistable expandable tubular 24.


A mechanical packer element is shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B and is a device with a deformable plastic element 26 that expands radially when compressed in the axial direction. The force to compress the element can be provided through a compression mechanism 27, such as a screw mechanism, cam, or a hydraulic piston. The mechanical packer element deploys the bistable expandable tubulars and connectors in the same way as the inflatable packer element. The deformable plastic element 26 applies an outward radial force to the inner circumference of the bistable expandable tubulars and connectors, allowing them in turn to expand from a contracted position (see FIG. 6A) to a final deployment diameter (see FIG. 6B).


An expandable swage is shown in FIGS. 7A-7D and comprises a series of fingers 28 that are arranged radially around a conical mandrel 30. FIGS. 7A and 7C show side and top views respectively. When the mandrel 30 is pushed or pulled through the fingers 28 they expand radially outwards, as illustrated in FIGS. 7B and 7D. An expandable swage is used in the same manner as a mechanical packer element to deploy a bistable expandable tubular and connector.


A piston type apparatus is shown in FIGS. 8A-8D and comprises a series of pistons 32 facing radially outwardly and used as a mechanism to expand the bistable expandable tubulars and connectors. When energized, the pistons 32 apply a radially directed force to deploy the bistable expandable tubular assembly as per the inflatable packer element. FIGS. 8A and 8C illustrate the pistons retracted while FIGS. 8B and 8D show the pistons extended. The piston type apparatus can be actuated hydraulically, mechanically or electrically.


A plug type actuator is illustrated in FIGS. 9A and 9B and comprises a plug 34 that is pushed or pulled through the bistable expandable tubulars 24 or connectors as shown in FIG. 9A. The plug is sized to expand the bistable cells past their critical point where they will snap to a final expanded diameter as shown in FIG. 9B.


A ball type actuator is shown in FIGS. 10A and 10B and operates when an oversized ball 36 is pumped through the middle of the bistable expandable tubulars 24 and connectors. To prevent fluid losses through the cell slots, an expandable elastomer based liner 38 is run inside the bistable expandable tubular system. The liner 38 acts as a seal and allows the ball 36 to be hydraulically pumped through the bistable tubular 24 and connectors. The effect of pumping the ball 36 through the bistable expandable tubulars 24 and connectors is to expand the cell geometry beyond the critical bistable point, allowing full expansion to take place as shown in FIG. 10B. Once the bistable expandable tubulars and connectors are expanded, the elastomer sleeve 38 and ball 36 are withdrawn.


Radial roller type actuators also can be used to expand the bistable tubular sections. FIG. 12 illustrates a motor driven expandable radial roller tool. The tool comprises one or more sets of arms 58 that are expanded to a set diameter by means of a mechanism and pivot. On the end of each set of arms is a roller 60. Centralizers 62 can be attached to the tool to locate it correctly inside the wellbore and the bistable tubular 24. A motor 64 provides the force to rotate the whole assembly, thus turning the roller(s) circumferentially inside the wellbore. The axis of the roller(s) is such as to allow the roller(s) to rotate freely when brought into contact with the inner surface of the tubular. Each roller can be conically-shaped in section to increase the contact area of roller surface to the inner wall of the tubular. The rollers are initially retracted and the tool is run inside the collapsed bistable tubular. The tool is then rotated by the motor 64, and rollers 60 are moved outwardly to contact the inner surface of the bistable tubular. Once in contact with the tubular, the rollers are pivoted outwardly a greater distance to apply an outwardly radial force to the bistable tubular. The outward movement of the rollers can be accomplished via centrifugal force or an appropriate actuator mechanism coupled between the motor 64 and the rollers 60.


The final pivot position is adjusted to a point where the bistable tubular can be expanded to the final diameter. The tool is then longitudinally moved through the collapsed bistable tubular, while the motor continues to rotate the pivot arms and rollers. The rollers follow a shallow helical path 66 inside the bistable tubular, expanding the bistable cells in their path. Once the bistable tubular is deployed, the tool rotation is stopped and the roller retracted. The tool is then withdrawn from the bistable tubular by a conveyance device 68 that also can be used to insert the tool.



FIG. 13 illustrates a hydraulically driven radial roller deployment device. The tool comprises one or more rollers 60 that are brought into contact with the inner surface of the bistable tubular by means of a hydraulic piston 70. The outward radial force applied by the rollers can be increased to a point where the bistable tubular expands to its final diameter. Centralizers 62 can be attached to the tool to locate it correctly inside the wellbore and bistable tubular 24. The rollers 60 are initially retracted and the tool is run into the collapsed bistable tubular 24. The rollers 60 are then deployed and push against the inside wall of the bistable tubular 24 to expand a portion of the tubular to its final diameter. The entire tool is then pushed or pulled longitudinally through the bistable tubular 24 expanding the entire length of bistable cells 23. Once the bistable tubular 24 is deployed in its expanded state, the rollers 60 are retracted and the tool is withdrawn from the wellbore by the conveyance device 68 used to insert it. By altering the axis of the rollers 60, the tool can be rotated via a motor as it travels longitudinally through the bistable tubular 24.


Power to operate the deployment device can be drawn from one or a combination of sources such as: electrical power supplied either from the surface or stored in a battery arrangement along with the deployment device, hydraulic power provided by surface or downhole pumps, turbines or a fluid accumulator, and mechanical power supplied through an appropriate linkage actuated by movement applied at the surface or stored downhole such as in a spring mechanism.


The bistable expandable tubular system is designed so the internal diameter of the deployed tubular is expanded to maintain a maximum cross-sectional area along the expandable tubular. This feature enables mono-bore wells to be constructed and facilitates elimination of problems associated with traditional wellbore casing systems where the casing outside diameter must be stepped down many times, restricting access, in long wellbores.


The bistable expandable tubular system can be applied in numerous applications such as an expandable open hole liner (see FIG. 14) where the bistable expandable tubular 24 is used to support an open hole formation by exerting an external radial force on the wellbore surface. As bistable tubular 24 is radially expanded in the direction of arrows 71, the tubular moves into contact with the surface forming wellbore 29. These radial forces help stabilize the formations and allow the drilling of wells with fewer conventional casing strings. The open hole liner also can comprise a material, e.g. a wrapping 72, that reduces the rate of fluid loss from the wellbore into the formations. The wrapping 72 can be made from a variety of materials including expandable metallic and/or elastomeric materials. By reducing fluid loss into the formations, the expense of drilling fluids can be reduced and the risk of losing circulation and/or borehole collapse can be minimized.


Liners also can be used within wellbore tubulars for purposes such as corrosion protection. One example of a corrosive environment is the environment that results when carbon dioxide is used to enhance oil recovery from a producing formation. Carbon dioxide (CO2) readily reacts with any water (H2O) that is present to form carbonic acid (H2CO3). Other acids can also be generated, especially if sulfur compounds are present. Tubulars used to inject the carbon dioxide as well as those used in producing wells are subject to greatly elevated corrosion rates. The present invention can be used for placing protective liners, a bistable tubular 24, within an existing tubular (e.g. tubular 73 illustrated with dashed lines in FIG. 14) to minimize the corrosive effects and to extend the useful life of the wellbore tubulars.


Another application involves use of the bistable tubular 24 illustrated in FIG. 14 as an expandable perforated liner. The open bistable cells in the bistable expandable tubular allow unrestricted flow from the formation while providing a structure to stabilize the borehole.


Still another application of the bistable tubular 24 is as an expandable sand screen where the bistable cells are sized to act as a sand control screen or an expandable screen element 74 can be affixed to the bistable expandable tubular as illustrated in FIG. 14A in its collapsed state. The expandable screen element 74 can be formed as a wrapping around bistable tubular 24. It has been found that the imposition of hoop stress forces onto the wall of a borehole will in itself help stabilize the formation and reduce or eliminate the influx of sand from the producing zones, even if no additional screen element is used.


Another application of the bistable tubular 24 is as a reinforced expandable liner where the bistable expandable tubular cell structure is reinforced with a cement or resin 75, as illustrated in FIG. 14B. The cement or resin 75 provides increased structural support or hydraulic isolation from the formation.


The bistable expandable tubular 24 also can be used as an expandable connection system to join traditional lengths of casing 76a or 76b of different diameters as illustrated in FIG. 14C. The tubular 24 also can be used as a structural repair joint to provide increased strength for existing sections of casing.


Another application includes using the bistable expandable tubular 24 as an anchor within the wellbore from which other tools or casings can be attached, or as a “fishing” tool in which the bistable characteristics are utilized to retrieve items lost or stuck in a wellbore. The bistable expandable tubular 24 in its collapsed configuration is inserted into a lost item 77 and then expanded as indicated by arrows 78 in FIG. 14D. In the expanded configuration the bistable tubular exerts radial forces that assist in retrieving the lost item. The bistable tubular also can be run into the well in its expanded configuration, placed over and collapsed in the direction of arrows 79 around lost item 77 in an attempt to attach and retrieve it as illustrated in FIG. 14E. Once lost item 77 is gripped by bistable tubular 24, it can be retrieved through wellbore 29.


The above described bistable expandable tubulars can be made in a variety of manners such as: cutting appropriately shaped paths through the wall of a tubular pipe thereby creating an expandable bistable device in its collapsed state; cutting patterns into a tubular pipe thereby creating an expandable bistable device in its expanded state and then compressing the device into its collapsed state; cutting appropriate paths through a sheet of material, rolling the material into a tubular shape and joining the ends to form an expandable bistable device in its collapsed state; or cutting patterns into a sheet of material, rolling the material into a tubular shape, joining the adjoining ends to form an expandable bistable device in its expanded state and then compressing the device into its collapsed state.


The materials of construction for the bistable expandable tubulars can include those typically used within the oil and gas industry such as carbon steel. They can also be made of specialty alloys (such as a monel, inconel, hastelloy or tungsten-based alloys) if the application requires.


The configurations shown for the bistable tubular 24 are illustrative of the operation of a basic bistable cell. Other configurations may be suitable, but the concept presented is also valid for these other geometries.



FIG. 15 illustrates an expandable tubing 80 formed of bi-stable cells 82. The tubing 80 defines a thinned portion 84 (best seen in FIG. 15) which may be in the form of a slot, as shown, a flattening, or other thinning of a portion of the tubing 80. The thinned portion 84 extends generally longitudinally and may be linear, helical, or follow some other circuitous path. In one embodiment, the thinned portion extends from one end of the tubing to the other to provide a communication line path 84 for the tubing 80. In such an embodiment, a communication line 86 may pass through the communication line path 84 along the tubing 80. In this way, the communication line 86 stays within the general outside diameter of the tubing 80 or extends only slightly outside this diameter. Although the tubing is shown with one thinned portion 84, it may include a plurality that are spaced about the circumference of the tubing 80. The thinned portion 84 may be used to house a conduit (not shown) through which communication lines 86 pass or which is used for the transport of fluids or other materials, such as mixtures of fluids and solids.


As used herein, the term “communication line” refers to any type of communication line such as electric, hydraulic, fiber optic, combinations of these, and the like.



FIG. 15A illustrates an exemplary thinned portion 84 designed to receive a device 88. As with the cable 60 placement, device 88 is at least partially housed in the thinned portion of the tubing 80 so that the extent to which it extends beyond the outer diameter of the tubing 80 is lessened. Examples of certain alternative embodiments of devices 88 are electrical devices, measuring devices, meters, gauges, sensors. More specific examples comprise valves, sampling devices, a device used in intelligent or smart well completion, temperature sensors, pressure sensors, flow-control devices, flow rate measurement devices, oil/water/gas ratio measurement devices, scale detectors, equipment sensors (e.g., vibration sensors), sand detection sensors, water detection sensors, data recorders, viscosity sensors, density sensors, bubble point sensors, composition sensors, resistivity array devices and sensors, acoustic devices and sensors, other telemetry devices, near infrared sensors, gamma ray detectors, H2S detectors, CO2 detectors, downhole memory units, downhole controllers. Examples of measurements that the devices might make are flow rate, pressure, temperature, differential pressure, density, relative amounts of liquid, gas, and solids, water cut, oil-water ratio, and other measurements.


As shown in the figure, the device 88 may be exposed to fluid inside and outside of tubing 80 via openings formed by the cells 82. Thus, the thinned portion 84 may bridge openings as well as linkages 21, 22 of the cells 82. Also note that the communication line 86 and associated communication line path 84 may extend a portion of the length of the tubing 80 in certain alternative designs. For example, if a device 88 is placed intermediate the ends of the tubing 80, the communication line passageway 84 may only need to extend from an end of the tubing to the position of the device 80.



FIG. 16 illustrates an expandable tubing 80 formed of bi-stable cells 82 having thin struts 21 and thick struts 22. At least one of the thick struts (labeled as 90) is relatively wider than other struts of the tubing 80. The wider strut 90 may be used for various purposes such as routing of communication lines, including cables, or devices, such as sensor arrays.



FIGS. 17A and 17B illustrate tubing 80 having a strut 90 that is relatively wider than the other thick struts 22. A passageway 92 formed in the strut 90 facilitates placement of a communication line in the well and through the tubing 80 and may be used for other purposes. FIG. 17B is a cross sectional view showing the passageway 92. Passageway 92 is an alternative embodiment of a communication line path 84. A passageway 94 may be configured to generally follow the curvature of a strut, e.g. one of the thick struts 22, as further illustrated in FIGS. 17A and 17B.



FIG. 18 illustrates a thinned portion 84 having a dovetail design with a relatively narrower opening. The communication line 86 is formed so that it fits through the relatively narrow opening into the wider, lower portion, e.g. by inserting one side edge and then the other. Communication line 86 is held in place due to the dovetail design as is apparent from the figures. The width of the communication line 86 is greater than the width of the opening. Note that the communication line 86 may comprise a bundle of lines which may be of the same or different forms (e.g., a hydraulic, an electric, and a fiber optic line bundled together). Also, connectors for connecting adjacent tubings may incorporate a connection for the communication lines.


Note that the communication line passageway 84 may be used in conjunction with other types of expandable tubings, such as those of the expandable slotted liner type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,012, issued Nov. 22, 1994 to Lohbeck, the folded tubing types of U.S. Pat. No. 3,489,220, issued Jan. 13, 1970 to Kinley, U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,823, issued Aug. 16, 1994 to Nobileau, U.S. Pat. No. 3,203,451, issued Aug. 31, 1965 to Vincent.


The particular embodiments disclosed herein are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for use in a wellbore, comprising: an expandable bistable device configured for deployment proximate a wellbore wall, the expandable bistable device having a plurality of bistable cells arranged in a generally tubular shape, the plurality of bistable cells being stable in a collapsed configuration and in an expanded configuration,wherein each cell comprises a first member and a second member, the first member and the second member each comprising a mid-point and two ends, andfurther wherein the first member is more flexible than the second member.
  • 2. The apparatus as recited in claim 2, wherein the first and second members are mechanically connected such that the second member hinders deformation of the first member.
  • 3. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the first member has two stable positions, the first stable position being where the first member mid-point is adjacent to the second member mid-point, the second stable position being where the first member mid-point is displaced from the second member mid-point to form a gap between the first member mid-point and the second member mid-point.
  • 4. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the second member has a greater thickness than the first member.
  • 5. The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the thickness ratio of the second member to the first member is greater than approximately 3:1.
  • 6. TheAn apparatus as recited in claim 1,for use in a wellbore, comprising: an expandable bistable device configured for deployment proximate a wellbore wall, the expandable bistable device having a plurality of bistable cells arranged in a generally tubular shape, the plurality of bistable cells being stable in a collapsed configuration and in an expanded configuration,wherein each cell comprises a first member and a second member, the first member and the second member each comprising a mid-point and two ends, wherein the thickness ratio of the second member to the first member is greater than approximately 6:1., andfurther wherein the first member is more flexible than the second member.
  • 7. An apparatus for use in a wellborn, comprising: an expandable bistable device configured for deployment proximate a wellbore wall, the expandable bistable device having a plurality of bistable cells arranged in a generally tubular shape, the plurality of bistable cells being stable in a collapsed configuration and in an expanded configuration,wherein the bistable device further comprises a wrapping attached to the outer surface of the bistable device.
  • 8. A TheAn apparatus as recited in claim 7,for use in a wellbore, comprising: an expandable bistable device configured for deployment proximate a wellbore wall, the expandable bistable device having a plurality of bistable cells arranged in a generally tubular shape, the plurality of bistable cells being stable in a collapsed configuration and in an expanded configuration,wherein the bistable device further comprises a wrapping attached to the other surface of the bistable device, and wherein the wrapping comprises an expandable screen.
  • 9. The apparatus as recited in claim 7, wherein the wrapping comprises a deformable material.
  • 10. The apparatus as recited in claim 9, wherein the deformable material comprises an elastomer.
  • 11. TheAn apparatus as recited in claim 10, wherein thefor use in a wellbore, comprising: an expandable bistable device configured for deployment proximate a wellbore wall, the expandable bistable device having a plurality of bistable cells arranged in a generally tubular shape, the plurality of bistable cells being stable in a collapsed configuration and in an expanded configuration,wherein the bistable device further comprises a wrapping attached to the outer surface of the bistable device, andwherein the wrapping comprises a deformable material that comprises an elastomer is selected to be resistant to crude oils, brines, and acids encountered in oil and gas wells.
  • 12. An apparatus for use in a wellbore, comprising: an expandable bistable device configured for deployment proximate a wellbore wall, the expandable bistable device having a plurality of bistable cells arranged in a generally tubular shape, the plurality of bistable cells being stable in a collapsed configuration and in an expanded configuration,wherein the bistable device in its second generally tubular configuration comprises a plurality of diameters.
  • 13. A method of stabilizing an uncased section of a wellbore in an underground formation, comprising: providing an expandable bistable device having a generally tubular shape that comprises a plurality of bistable cells;placing the bistable device at a position in the wellbore while in a first stable state;radially expanding the bistable device to a second stable state having a generally tubular configuration without substantially reducing axial length; andattaching a wrapping to the outer surface of the bistable device.
  • 14. TheA method as recited in claim 13,of stabilizing an uncased section of a wellbore in an underground formation, comprising: providing an expandable bistable device having a generally tubular shape that comprises a plurality of bistable cells;placing the bistable device at a position in the wellbore while in a first stable state;radially expanding the bistable device to a second stable state having a generally tubular configuration without substantially reducing axial length; andattaching a wrapping to the outer surface of the bistable device, wherein attaching comprises attachingthe wrapping comprises an expandable screen.
  • 15. TheA method as recited in claim 13, further comprisingof stabilizing an uncased section of a wellbore in an underground formation, comprising: providing an expandable bistable device having a generally tubular shape that comprises a plurality of bistable cells;placing the bistable device at a position in the wellbore while in a first stable state;radially expanding the bistable device to a second stable state having a generally tubular configuration without substantially reducing axial length; and applying a deformable material that comprises an elastomer selected to be resistant to crude oils, brines, and acids encountered in oil and gas wells to the outer surface of the bistable device.
  • 16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein applying comprises applying an elastomeric material.
  • 17. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein radially expanding comprises expanding the bistable device to a plurality of final diameters.
  • 18. A method for installing liners within a tubular located in a wellbore, comprising: forming an expandable bistable device with a plurality of bistable cells, the expandable bistable device having a generally tubular shape;surrounding the expandable bistable device with an expandable liner element attached to an outer surface of the bistable device;placing the expandable bistable device at a position within a tubular while in a first stable state; andexpanding the expandable bistable device into a second stable state to hold the liner element against an inner diameter of the tubular.
  • 19. The method as recited in claim 18, further comprising locating multiple bistable devices in the wellbore such that the ends of the adjacent bistable devices overlap and form a continuation of the liner element against the inner diameter of the tubular.
  • 20. The method as recited in claim 18, further comprising creating each bistable cell with a thin strut connected to a thick strut.
  • 21. A method for facilitating use of a wellbore, comprising: inhibiting sand influx into a wellbore, wherein inhibiting comprises:placing a bistable device at a desired position in a wellbore; andexpanding the bistable device at least partially through a nonstable range towards a stable state until the bistable device is able to exert hoop stress forces against the wellbore.
  • 22. The method as recited in claim 21, further comprising attaching a wrapping to an outer surface of the bistable member.
  • 23. The method as recited in claim 22, wherein attaching comprises attaching an expandable screen.
  • 24. A system for facilitating communication along a wellbore, comprising: an expandable tubing formed of a plurality of bi-stable cells, the expandable tubing having a communication line passageway,wherein the communication line passageway is defined by a thinned portion along the expandable tubing.
  • 25. A method of routing a communication line in a well, comprising: deploying an expandable tubing in a well, wherein deploying comprises running an expandable tubing formed of bistable cells into a well;routing at least a portion of a communication line adjacent at least a portion of the expandable tubing;expanding the expandable tubing; andforming the communication line along a thick strut formed between a plurality of bistable cells.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The following is based on and claims the priority of provisional application No. 60/242,276 filed Oct. 20, 2000 and provisional application No. 60/263,941 filed Jan. 24, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (368)
Number Name Date Kind
261252 Olmsted Jul 1882 A
380419 Bignall Apr 1888 A
997191 Hogarth Jul 1911 A
1135809 Jones Apr 1915 A
1229437 Foster Jun 1917 A
1233888 Leonard Jul 1917 A
1276213 Hare Aug 1918 A
1301285 Leonard Apr 1919 A
1314600 McCakey Sep 1919 A
1647907 Doty Nov 1927 A
1945079 Riemenschneider Jan 1934 A
1981525 Price Nov 1934 A
2016683 Moore Oct 1935 A
2050128 Schlumberger Aug 1936 A
2171840 Armentrout Sep 1939 A
2217708 Scaramucci Oct 1940 A
2220205 Buckley Nov 1940 A
2371385 Eckel Mar 1945 A
2530966 Huber Nov 1950 A
2677466 Lowe May 1954 A
2696169 Lassiter Dec 1954 A
2760581 Johnston Aug 1956 A
2769655 Holmes Nov 1956 A
2812025 Teague et al. Nov 1957 A
2835328 Thompson May 1958 A
2990017 Powers Jun 1961 A
3069125 Hewitt Dec 1962 A
3179168 Vincent Apr 1965 A
3203451 Vincent Aug 1965 A
3253842 Rabe May 1966 A
3297092 Jennings Jan 1967 A
3353599 Swift Nov 1967 A
3358492 Richter Dec 1967 A
3389752 Lebourg Jun 1968 A
3414055 Vogt Dec 1968 A
3415321 Venghiattis Dec 1968 A
3419080 Lebourg Dec 1968 A
3463247 Klein Aug 1969 A
3482629 Suman Dec 1969 A
3489220 Kinley Jan 1970 A
3507340 Voetter Apr 1970 A
3508587 Mauch Apr 1970 A
3556219 Meldau Jan 1971 A
3561529 Owen Feb 1971 A
3604732 Malone Sep 1971 A
3657744 Ersek Apr 1972 A
3672705 Rush Jun 1972 A
3692114 Murphey, Jr. et al. Sep 1972 A
3785193 Kinley Jan 1974 A
3816894 Howard Jun 1974 A
3864970 Bell Feb 1975 A
3898717 Schwartz Aug 1975 A
3913676 Barbee, Jr. et al. Oct 1975 A
3926409 Abney Dec 1975 A
3963076 Winslow Jun 1976 A
4064938 Fast Dec 1977 A
4065953 Frentzen Jan 1978 A
4185856 McCaskill Jan 1980 A
4253522 Setterberg, Jr. Mar 1981 A
4295527 Russe Oct 1981 A
4309891 Pogonowski Jan 1982 A
4337969 Escaron Jul 1982 A
4375164 Dodge Mar 1983 A
4401158 Spencer Aug 1983 A
4495997 Scott Jan 1985 A
4541486 Wetzel Sep 1985 A
4553595 Huang Nov 1985 A
4558219 LeBlanc Dec 1985 A
4558742 Huang Dec 1985 A
4566538 Peterson Jan 1986 A
4578608 Mech Mar 1986 A
4580568 Gianturco Apr 1986 A
4600037 Hatten Jul 1986 A
4606408 Zunkel Aug 1986 A
4626129 Kothmann Dec 1986 A
4655771 Wallsten Apr 1987 A
4657079 Nagaoka Apr 1987 A
4665906 Jervis May 1987 A
4665918 Garza May 1987 A
4706659 Matthews Nov 1987 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4739762 Palmaz Apr 1988 A
4740207 Kreamer Apr 1988 A
4783995 Michel Nov 1988 A
4809792 Lynch Mar 1989 A
4832121 Anderson May 1989 A
4866062 Toth Sep 1989 A
4874327 Ip Oct 1989 A
4886062 Wiktor Dec 1989 A
4945991 Jones Aug 1990 A
4950258 Kawai Aug 1990 A
4969890 Sugita Nov 1990 A
4976142 Perales Dec 1990 A
4990155 Wilkoff Feb 1991 A
4994071 MacGregor Feb 1991 A
5102417 Palmaz Apr 1992 A
5104404 Wolff Apr 1992 A
5107927 Whiteley Apr 1992 A
5119373 Fredricsson Jun 1992 A
5141360 Zeman Aug 1992 A
5147370 McNamara Sep 1992 A
5156220 Forehand Oct 1992 A
5163321 Perales Nov 1992 A
5174379 Whiteley Dec 1992 A
5186255 Corey Feb 1993 A
5192307 Wall Mar 1993 A
5195984 Schatz Mar 1993 A
5197978 Hess Mar 1993 A
5211241 Mashaw, Jr. et al. May 1993 A
5226913 Pinchuk Jul 1993 A
5234448 Wholey Aug 1993 A
5243190 Bandy Sep 1993 A
5282823 Schwartz Feb 1994 A
5318121 Brockman Jun 1994 A
5329998 King Jul 1994 A
5337823 Nobileau Aug 1994 A
5348095 Worrall et al. Sep 1994 A
5354308 Simon Oct 1994 A
5355948 Sparlin Oct 1994 A
5355949 Sparlin Oct 1994 A
5355953 Shy Oct 1994 A
5366012 Lohbeck Nov 1994 A
5377104 Sorrells Dec 1994 A
5377823 Steen et al. Jan 1995 A
5383892 Cardon Jan 1995 A
5383926 Lock Jan 1995 A
5396957 Surjaatmadja Mar 1995 A
5397355 Marin Mar 1995 A
5403341 Solar Apr 1995 A
5411507 Heckele May 1995 A
5419760 Narciso, Jr. May 1995 A
5449373 Pinchasik Sep 1995 A
5449382 Dayton Sep 1995 A
5450898 Sparlin Sep 1995 A
5456319 Schmidt Oct 1995 A
5492175 El-Rabaa et al. Feb 1996 A
5496365 Sgro Mar 1996 A
5500013 Buscemi Mar 1996 A
5515915 Jones May 1996 A
5545208 Wolff Aug 1996 A
5545210 Hess Aug 1996 A
5554183 Nazari Sep 1996 A
5556413 Lam Sep 1996 A
5562690 Green Oct 1996 A
5562697 Christiansen Oct 1996 A
5576485 Serata Nov 1996 A
5601593 Freitag Feb 1997 A
5618299 Khosravi Apr 1997 A
5628787 Mayer May 1997 A
5641023 Ross Jun 1997 A
5643314 Carpenter Jul 1997 A
5663805 Asai Sep 1997 A
5667011 Gill et al. Sep 1997 A
5670161 Healy Sep 1997 A
5695516 Fischell Dec 1997 A
5697971 Fischell Dec 1997 A
5702419 Berry Dec 1997 A
5723781 Pruett Mar 1998 A
5725570 Heath Mar 1998 A
5725572 Lam Mar 1998 A
5733303 Israel Mar 1998 A
5755774 Pinchuk May 1998 A
5755776 Al-Saadon May 1998 A
5776181 Lee Jul 1998 A
5776183 Kanesaka Jul 1998 A
5785120 Smalley Jul 1998 A
5806589 Lang Sep 1998 A
5807404 Richter Sep 1998 A
5824040 Cox Oct 1998 A
5833001 Song Nov 1998 A
5842516 Jones Dec 1998 A
5861025 Boudghene Jan 1999 A
5865073 Wilson Feb 1999 A
5871538 Dereume Feb 1999 A
5872901 Konno Feb 1999 A
5876449 Starck Mar 1999 A
5891191 Stinson Apr 1999 A
5895406 Gray Apr 1999 A
5896928 Coon Apr 1999 A
5899882 Waksman May 1999 A
5901789 Donnelly et al. May 1999 A
5913897 Corso, Jr. et al. Jun 1999 A
5918672 McConnell Jul 1999 A
5922020 Klein Jul 1999 A
5924745 Campbell Jul 1999 A
5928280 Hansen Jul 1999 A
5934376 Nguyen Aug 1999 A
5957195 Bailey Sep 1999 A
5964296 Ross Oct 1999 A
5972018 Israel Oct 1999 A
5984568 Lohbeck Nov 1999 A
5997580 Mastrorio Dec 1999 A
6004348 Banas Dec 1999 A
6012522 Donnelly Jan 2000 A
6012523 Campbell Jan 2000 A
6013854 Moriuchi Jan 2000 A
6017362 Lau Jan 2000 A
6019789 Dinh Feb 2000 A
6020981 Ogiyama Feb 2000 A
6021850 Wood Feb 2000 A
6022371 Killion Feb 2000 A
6027526 Limon Feb 2000 A
6027527 Asano Feb 2000 A
6029748 Forsyth et al. Feb 2000 A
6031637 Shibata Feb 2000 A
6042606 Frantzen Mar 2000 A
6049597 Satake Apr 2000 A
6063113 Kavteladze May 2000 A
6064491 Matsumoto May 2000 A
6065500 Metcalfe May 2000 A
6070671 Cumming Jun 2000 A
6083258 Yadav Jul 2000 A
6095242 Lequang Aug 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb Aug 2000 A
6106548 Roubin Aug 2000 A
6112818 Campbell Sep 2000 A
6131662 Ross Oct 2000 A
6135208 Gano Oct 2000 A
6138776 Hart Oct 2000 A
6142230 Smalley Nov 2000 A
6147774 Hamadani Nov 2000 A
6152599 Salter, Jr. Nov 2000 A
6190406 Duerig Feb 2001 B1
6193744 Ehr Feb 2001 B1
6203569 Wijay Mar 2001 B1
6206911 Milo Mar 2001 B1
6213686 Baugh Apr 2001 B1
6220345 Jones Apr 2001 B1
6220361 Brisco Apr 2001 B1
6227303 Jones May 2001 B1
6244360 Steinsland Jun 2001 B1
6250385 Montaron Jun 2001 B1
6253844 Walker Jul 2001 B1
6253850 Nazzai et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261319 Kveen Jul 2001 B1
6263966 Haut et al. Jul 2001 B1
6263972 Richard et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264685 Ahari Jul 2001 B1
6273634 Lohbeck Aug 2001 B1
6281489 Tubel Aug 2001 B1
6315040 Donnelly Nov 2001 B1
6321503 Warren Nov 2001 B1
6322109 Campbell Nov 2001 B1
6325148 Trahan Dec 2001 B1
6327938 Pietras Dec 2001 B1
6328113 Cook Dec 2001 B1
6330911 Allen Dec 2001 B1
6330918 Hosie Dec 2001 B1
6343651 Bixenman Feb 2002 B1
6360633 Pietras Mar 2002 B2
6368355 Uflacker Apr 2002 B1
6371203 Frank Apr 2002 B2
6374565 Warren Apr 2002 B1
6378614 Adams Apr 2002 B1
6382318 Whitlock May 2002 B1
6415509 Echols Jul 2002 B1
6425444 Metcalfe Jul 2002 B1
6431271 Thomeer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446729 Bixenman Sep 2002 B1
6451052 Burmeister Sep 2002 B1
6454493 Lohbeck Sep 2002 B1
6457518 Castano-Mears et al. Oct 2002 B1
6457532 Simpson Oct 2002 B1
6464720 Boatman Oct 2002 B2
6478091 Gano Nov 2002 B1
6478092 Voll et al. Nov 2002 B2
6485524 Strecker Nov 2002 B2
6488702 Besselink Dec 2002 B1
6510896 Bode Jan 2003 B2
6512599 Hattori Jan 2003 B1
6513599 Bixenman Feb 2003 B1
6520254 Hurst Feb 2003 B2
6527047 Pietras Mar 2003 B1
6536291 Gysling Mar 2003 B1
6540777 Stenzel Apr 2003 B2
6554064 Restarick Apr 2003 B1
6571871 Lauritzen Jun 2003 B2
6575245 Hurst Jun 2003 B2
6578630 Simpson Jun 2003 B2
6582461 Burmeister Jun 2003 B1
6598678 Simpson Jul 2003 B1
6622797 Sivley, IV Sep 2003 B2
6634431 Cook Oct 2003 B2
6648071 Hackworth Nov 2003 B2
6669718 Besselink Dec 2003 B2
6675891 Hailey, Jr. et al. Jan 2004 B2
6681854 Danos Jan 2004 B2
6684951 Restarick Feb 2004 B2
6688395 Maguire Feb 2004 B2
6688397 McClurkin Feb 2004 B2
6695054 Johnson Feb 2004 B2
6695067 Johnson Feb 2004 B2
6706063 Besselink Mar 2004
6719064 Price-Smith et al. Apr 2004 B2
6722427 Gano Apr 2004 B2
6722441 Lauritzen Apr 2004 B2
6725918 Gano Apr 2004 B2
6725934 Coronado Apr 2004 B2
6745845 Cook Jun 2004 B2
6755856 Fierens Jun 2004 B2
6772836 Schetky Aug 2004 B2
6789621 Wetzel Sep 2004 B2
6799637 Schetky Oct 2004 B2
6805196 Lawrence Oct 2004 B2
6817410 Wetzel Nov 2004 B2
6823943 Baugh Nov 2004 B2
6848510 Bixenman Feb 2005 B2
6877553 Cameron Apr 2005 B2
6896052 Simpson May 2005 B2
6904974 Slack Jun 2005 B2
6907930 Cavender Jun 2005 B2
6924640 Fickert Aug 2005 B2
6932161 Cameron Aug 2005 B2
6962203 Funchess Nov 2005 B2
6983796 Bayne Jan 2006 B2
6994167 Ramos Feb 2006 B2
7036600 Johnson May 2006 B2
7048052 Hackworth May 2006 B2
7055609 Hayes Jun 2006 B2
7086476 Johnson Aug 2006 B2
7100690 Mullen Sep 2006 B2
7104324 Wetzel Sep 2006 B2
7108062 Castano-Mears et al. Sep 2006 B2
7131494 Bixenman Nov 2006 B2
7134501 Johnson Nov 2006 B2
7140446 Metcalfe Nov 2006 B2
7156180 Schetky Jan 2007 B2
7168485 Johnson Jan 2007 B2
7168486 Hackworth Jan 2007 B2
7182134 Wetzel Feb 2007 B2
7185709 Schetky et al. Mar 2007 B2
7191842 Hackworth Mar 2007 B2
7222676 Patel May 2007 B2
7235097 Calisse Jun 2007 B2
7291166 Cheng Nov 2007 B2
7300458 Henkes Nov 2007 B2
7398831 Schetky Jul 2008 B2
7476245 Abbate Jan 2009 B2
7681640 Bixenman Mar 2010 B2
7758628 Besselink Jul 2010 B2
20010027339 Boatman Oct 2001 A1
20010044652 Moore Nov 2001 A1
20020035394 Fierens et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020092649 Bixenman et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020107562 Hart Aug 2002 A1
20020125009 Wetzel Sep 2002 A1
20030074052 Besselink Apr 2003 A1
20030079885 Schetky May 2003 A1
20030079886 Schetky May 2003 A1
20030199969 Steinke Oct 2003 A1
20040034402 Bales Feb 2004 A1
20040065445 Abercrombie Simpson Apr 2004 A1
20040088043 Klein May 2004 A1
20040089454 Hackworth May 2004 A1
20040133270 Grandt Jul 2004 A1
20040182581 Schetky Sep 2004 A1
20040193247 Besselink Sep 2004 A1
20050039927 Wetzel Feb 2005 A1
20050055080 Istephanous Mar 2005 A1
20050163821 Sung Jul 2005 A1
20050182479 Bonsignore Aug 2005 A1
20060037745 Hart et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060217795 Besselink Sep 2006 A1
20060241739 Besselink Oct 2006 A1
20070084608 Bixenman Apr 2007 A1
20070102153 Bixenman May 2007 A1
20080097571 Denison Apr 2008 A1
20090187243 Johnson Jul 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (150)
Number Date Country
784777 Aug 2002 AU
2006202182 Jun 2006 AU
2006202182 Jun 2006 AU
1014914AS Jun 2004 BE
2602435 Jul 1998 CA
2359450 Apr 2002 CA
2359450 Apr 2002 CA
2513263 Apr 2002 CA
2513263 Apr 2002 CA
2367810 Jul 2002 CA
2367810 Jul 2002 CA
2544701 Jul 2002 CA
2544701 Jul 2002 CA
8812719 Nov 1989 DE
19728337 Jan 1999 DE
10201631 Nov 2002 DE
10201631 Nov 2002 DE
0274846 Jul 1988 EP
0326426 Aug 1989 EP
0326462 Aug 1989 EP
0335341 Oct 1989 EP
0364787 Apr 1990 EP
0421729 Apr 1991 EP
0540290 May 1993 EP
0587197 Mar 1994 EP
0636345 Feb 1995 EP
0664107 Jul 1995 EP
0674095 Sep 1995 EP
0679372 Nov 1995 EP
0688545 Dec 1995 EP
0734698 Oct 1996 EP
0744164 Nov 1996 EP
0779409 Jun 1997 EP
0897698 Feb 1999 EP
1031329 Aug 2000 EP
1042997 Oct 2000 EP
1152120 Nov 2001 EP
1223305 Jul 2002 EP
1223305 Nov 2002 EP
1255022 Nov 2002 EP
2617721 Jan 1989 FR
2642812 Aug 1990 FR
2081173 Feb 1982 GB
2169515 Jul 1986 GB
2175824 Dec 1986 GB
2287093 Sep 1995 GB
2317630 Apr 1998 GB
2347448 Sep 2000 GB
2355740 May 2001 GB
2362462 Nov 2001 GB
2366817 Mar 2002 GB
2368082 Apr 2002 GB
2369382 Apr 2002 GB
2369382 May 2002 GB
2370301 Jun 2002 GB
2370574 Jul 2002 GB
2371063 Jul 2002 GB
2371064 Jul 2002 GB
2371066 Jul 2002 GB
2371574 Jul 2002 GB
2379690 Mar 2003 GB
2379691 Mar 2003 GB
2379692 Mar 2003 GB
2379693 Mar 2003 GB
2379694 Mar 2003 GB
2379694 Mar 2003 GB
2382831 Jun 2003 GB
2382831 Jun 2003 GB
2386625 Sep 2003 GB
2386625 Sep 2003 GB
2392461 Mar 2004 GB
2392461 Mar 2004 GB
2395214 May 2004 GB
2395214 May 2004 GB
2403491 Jan 2005 GB
2404683 Feb 2005 GB
2404683 Feb 2005 GB
2408531 Jun 2005 GB
2408531 Jun 2005 GB
2409694 Jul 2005 GB
2409694 Jul 2005 GB
2410273 Jul 2005 GB
2410273 Jul 2005 GB
A9312743 Dec 1997 JP
2002121654 Apr 2002 JP
3958602 Nov 2002 JP
2002332791 Nov 2002 JP
1019192 Apr 2002 NL
1019753 Jul 2002 NL
1021076 Jul 2002 NL
1022037 Feb 2003 NL
20020223 Jul 2002 NO
20034598 Apr 2004 NO
2225497 Jul 2003 RU
2225497 Jul 2003 RU
2263198 May 2005 RU
104956 Jul 2004 SG
1105620 Jul 1984 SU
8602124 Apr 1986 WO
9206734 Apr 1992 WO
9219310 Nov 1992 WO
9322986 Nov 1993 WO
9403127 Feb 1994 WO
9509584 Apr 1995 WO
9531945 Nov 1995 WO
9532757 Dec 1995 WO
9603942 Feb 1996 WO
9609013 Mar 1996 WO
9618359 Jun 1996 WO
9629028 Sep 1996 WO
9637680 Nov 1996 WO
9641589 Dec 1996 WO
9704721 Feb 1997 WO
9800626 Jan 1998 WO
9820810 May 1998 WO
9820810 May 1998 WO
9822690 May 1998 WO
9826152 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9832412 Jul 1998 WO
9849423 Nov 1998 WO
9849423 Nov 1998 WO
9850673 Nov 1998 WO
9850680 Nov 1998 WO
9857030 Dec 1998 WO
9902818 Jan 1999 WO
9915108 Apr 1999 WO
9923354 May 1999 WO
9945235 Sep 1999 WO
0036386 Jun 2000 WO
0061908 Oct 2000 WO
0129368 Apr 2001 WO
0129368 Apr 2001 WO
0142620 Jun 2001 WO
0142620 Jun 2001 WO
0146551 Jun 2001 WO
0165063 Sep 2001 WO
0165067 Sep 2001 WO
0173264 Oct 2001 WO
0188332 Nov 2001 WO
0192680 Dec 2001 WO
0206593 Jan 2002 WO
0206625 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0225057 Mar 2002 WO
308384 Feb 2004 WO
2004014255 Feb 2004 WO
2004014255 Feb 2004 WO
2007076051 Jul 2007 WO
2007076051 Jul 2007 WO
2007126729 Nov 2007 WO
2007126729 Nov 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (57)
Entry
Gravel Pack Systems: Mini-Beta Gravel Pack System, Baker Oil Tools, pp. 12-13, (Undated).
Sides, Win, Hydraulic Intelligent Completions, Baker Hughes, Advanced Technology Conference, Sep. 30-Oct. 1, 1999, slides 1-28 (6446729).
STDZ and Multizone Completion Systems, Halliburton Company, 1995.
Hamid, Syed, Lester, G. Scott and Adkins, Darrel W.; A Fiber-Optic Iinspection System for Prepacked Screens: Society of Petroleum Enaineers Inc.: pp. 1-12. Apr. 1999.
U.S. Pre-Grant Pub 2003/0056947, Cameron, Mar. 2003. Hamid, Syed, Lester, G. Scott and Adkins, Darrell W.; A Fiber-Optic Inspection System for Prepacked Screens; Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.; pp. 1-9, 1999.
Docket Sheet for Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.) (Pacer Jun. 2, 2005) (6 pages).
Docket Sheet for Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) (Pacer Aug. 11, 2005) (142 pages).
Hackworth et al., Development and First Application of Bistable Expandable Sand Screen, Oct. 5-8, 2003, SPE 84265, whole document.
European Search Report dated Mar. 15, 2006 re EP 05 02 2622 (PARGN.002VR1EP) in 4 pages.
European Search Report dated Jul. 21, 2008 re EP 05 02 2622 (PARGN.002VR1EP) in 4 pages.
Communication from United States District Court Transferring Case, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.), dated Sep. 7, 2004 (1 page).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (29 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil to Motions of Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (29 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (9 pages).
Reply of Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Kentucky Oil Technology's Opposition to First Amended, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (17 pages).
Schlumberger's Response to Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Schlumberger's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 2, and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to STC's Motion to Strike Exhibits 1, 3 and 4 to the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Apr. 18, 2005 (8 pages).
Second Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed May 6, 2005 (20 pages).
Plaintiff Memry Corporation's Reply to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Second Amended Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jun. 3, 2005 (9 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Counterclaims in Kentucky Oil Technology's Second Amended Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jun. 3, 2005 (18 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil Technology to Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil's Second Amended Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jun. 17, 2005 (16 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Counterclaims in Kentucky Oil Technology's Second Amended Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jun. 24, 2005 (11 pages).
Order Granting in Part and Denying In Part STC's Motion to Dismiss, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), entered Jul. 14, 2005 (8 pages).
Notice of Motion and Motion by Kentucky Oil to Compel Production of Documents by Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Rule 37; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Declaration of Michael Bierman, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jul. 28, 1005 (32 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Opposition to Kentucky Oil Technology's Motion to Compel, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 4, 2005 (21 pages).
Declaration of David B. Moyer in Support of Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Opposition to Kentucky Oil Technology's Motion to Compel, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 4, 2005 (51 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 10, 2005 (18 pages).
Order Granting Kentucky Oil's Motion to Compel Production of Documents, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), entered Aug. 17, 2005 (8 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Kentucky Oil's Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), entered Mar. 25, 2005 (2 pages).
Answer of Defendants and Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04 03843, (N.D. Cal.) filed Nov. 2, 2004 (20 pages).
Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano in Support of Kentucy Oil's Motion to Compel, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 10, 2005 (69 pages).
Defendants' Motions (1) to Dismiss the Complaint for Insufficiency of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, (2) to Dismiss Counts I-III of the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, and (3) in the Alternative, to Transfer This Action to the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed Jul. 7, 2004 (47 pages).
First Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D.Cal.), filed Feb. 9, 2005 (16 pages).
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Counterdefendants' Motion to Dismiss, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), entered Apr. 8, 2005 (26 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Answer to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Dec. 3, 2004 (10 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (4 pages).
Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 19, 2004 (20 pages).
Plaintiffs' Original Complaint, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed May 14, 2004 (20 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v: Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike Declaration of Benjamin Holl and Portions of Counterdefendants' Reply Briefs, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 25, 2005 (4 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Answer to Kentucky Oil Technology's Second Amended Counterclaims, Memry Corporation v. Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jul. 28, 2005 (8 pages).
Besselink, Peter, Biflex Stents; SMST-99; Proceedings of the First European Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies, Antwerp Zoo, Belgium, 1999; pp. 142-150.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,178 dated Jul. 28, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,154 dated Feb. 25, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,178 dated Mar. 1, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,220 dated Mar. 3, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,220 dated Jul. 19, 2011.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,154 dated Jul. 20, 2011.
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60242276 Oct 2000 US
60263941 Jan 2001 US
Reissues (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09973442 Oct 2001 US
Child 12872203 US