Patent Grant
11834240
This invention relates to the use of slit sheet material that is expanded to provide a cushioning product. In the preferred embodiments, the present invention provides substantially improved slit sheet cushioning products by advantageously combining novel paper properties with novel slit patterns for improved features and characteristics. In some illustrative and non-limiting example embodiments, cushioning products of the present invention can include, e.g., a novel slit sheet material in combination with extensible paper employed as, e.g., a cushioning pad or as cushioning within an envelope product, wherein the cushioning product can be substantially more resilient, but, yet, e.g., thinner for better utilization of space.
Further information relating to the paper which can be used in the present invention, slit patterns, and the expansion process is found in U.S. Pat. Nos. a) U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,778, b) U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,871, c) U.S. Pat. No. 5,688,578, d) U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,735, e) U.S. Pat. No. 3,908,071, f) U.S. Pat. No. 3,104,197, g) U.S. Pat. No. 3,220,116, h) U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,972, i) U.S. Pat. No. 3,269,393, j) U.S. Pat. No. 3,908,071, k) U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,832, l) U.S. Pat. No. 6,458,447 and m) U.S. Pat. No. 6,712,930, and in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/901,977, and in PCT application No. WO1984002936A1, and in U.S. Published Patent Application Nos. US 2002/0060034, US 2007/0240841, and the disclosures of which are all incorporated by reference herein in their entireties, as though recited in full herein.
In the preferred embodiments, the terminology “expandable” as applied to paper sheets, means a paper having a slit pattern that enables expansion of the paper, such as, e.g., as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. (a) U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,778, (b) U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,871, (c) U.S. Pat. No. 5,688,578, (d) U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,735 and (e) U.S. Pat. No. 10,226,907, and in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/054615, the entire disclosures of which patents and PCT application are all incorporated by reference herein as though recited in full. In the preferred embodiments, a slit pattern is configured to enable the paper to be expanded lengthwise, with a related decrease in width. In some embodiments, the slit pattern produces a paper that increases in length due to the slit pattern when processed in an expander, such as, e.g., an expander of the type described in any of the following U.S. and PCT applications (a) 2017/0203866, (b) 2018/022266, (c) 2018/0127197, and (d) PCT/US2014/054615, incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,667,871 and 5,688,578, slit Sheet Packing Material, teach the use of a plurality of individual slits forming parallel spaced rows forming a hexagonal expanded sheet with and without a separator sheet. It requires machinery to stretch the paper into its three-dimensional shape at the customer's location such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,778 which teaches the method and apparatus for producing the expansion of the slit sheet material performed at the packing site's location. U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,735 discloses an expander for expanding the slit sheet material of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,667,871 and 5,688,578.
For reference,
“The slit paper, indicated generally as 10, is illustrated in FIG. [3(A)] as it would come off the slitting machine. The sheets can be formed on a flat-bed slitter and produced directly as rectangular sheets, as well as on a rotary slitter and cut into individual sheets or stored directly as a continuous sheet in roll form. The flexible sheet 10 is preferably manufactured from exclusively recycled paper with the grain of the paper running in the direction of arrow A. The flexible sheet 10 is provided with slits 14 and slits 16 are parallel to the edges 22 and 24 of the flexible sheet 12 and perpendicular to the paper grain. The slits 14 and slits 16 are placed in rows and separated from one another by land 20 and legs 21 [shown in
“When expanded, the expanded sheet, indicated generally as 12, is formed of hexagonal cells 26, legs 21 and land 20 areas, as illustrated in FIG. [3(B)]. Preferably, at least a majority of the land 20 areas lie in a plurality of parallel planes. The planes of the land 20 areas form an angle of at least about 45 degrees with the plane of the sheet in flat form.”
“The slitting operation in which the slits are cut into the sheet material can take several forms. In one embodiment, rectangular sheets are provide with its total number of slits in one action. The term rectangular should be understood to include rectangles in which all four sides are equal, that is, square. Where the sheet material is subjected to rotary cutting or slitting, the pressure required for the cutting action is significantly lower that which is required for the flat bed cut, since essentially only a single row or a few rows of slits are cut simultaneously. Unlike prior art structures and systems, expansion contemporaneous with slitting is not desirable. Therefore a critical balance must be struck between resistance to opening of the cells during the rewind step and ease of opening of cells during the expansion step. By achieving this critical balance and producing a flat, unexpanded sheet, the sheet material has an effective thickness which is as much as one twentieth of the thickness of a sheet of expanded material. The compact configuration provides for the optimization of shipping and storage.”
In the preferred embodiments, the term “slit sheet” means an expandable paper sheet having a slit pattern. The following are direct quotes of U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,871 (the '871 patent).
First, column 10, lines 13-48, of the '871 patent explains:
“The length of the slit and the ratio of the land intervals between slit affects the dimensions of the polygons which are formed during the expansion step. The higher the ratio of slit length to interval length the greater is the maximum angle which can be formed between the plane of the sheet and the planes of the land areas. The greater the uniformity of the shape and size of the formed polygonal shaped open areas and the angle to which the land areas incline relative to the flat sheet, the greater is the degree to which interlocking of land areas can be achieved. Interlocking of land areas, that is, the nesting of layers of sheets, reduces the effective thickness of the sheets. However, the net effect is still a dramatic increase in effective sheet thickness. For example, 0.008 inch thick paper having a silt pattern of a ½″ slit, 3/16″ slit spacing, and ⅛″ row spacing, produces a ¼″ by 3/16″ land which can expand to under about one quarter of an inch thickness and will have a net effective thickness for two layers, when nested, of about 0.375 inches. It is noted that the land width is double the width of the legs. The net effect is a useful thickness expansion of roughly 20 times the unexpanded thickness of the paper.”
“The longer the slit relative to the rigidity of the sheet material, the weaker is the interlocking effect and the cushioning effect due to the weakness of the expanded structure. If the slits are too small, expansion can be severely limited and cushioning can be excessively limited. This does not mean that the dimensions are narrowly critical, but rather that the dimension must be selected relative to the characteristics of the paper, as for example the degree of rigidity, and the cushioning or energy absorbing effects which are required. The resistance to expansion increases relative to the increase in the size of the land areas. It should be understood that some resistance to opening is desired. The object rests on, or contacts the edge of the sheet formed by the incline of the land areas which turns the perimeter of the openings into upper and lower edges.”
Second, column 10, lines 58-67 and column 11, lines 1-6, of the '871 patent further explains:
“As heretofore mentioned, the slit dimensions can be varied to ease the process of opening. A ⅝″ slit, 3/16″ land by 3/16 row opens very easily since the number of hexagons is reduced. When the size of the hexagons are increased and the numbers decreased; the stretched thickness was increased, producing a very viable wrap material. This sizing increases the yield of the paper and provides almost the same protection as the ½″ slit. This sizing provides a less expensive product utilizing a larger content of post consumer waste while maintaining the integrity of the wrap product. The ½″ slit, 3/16″ land by ⅛″ row pattern produces a more protective wrap due to the greater number of wraps that can be made within the same volume. Thus, a 2½ pound vase dropped from a thirty inch height, with only ½″ of cumulative sheet thickness around the vase, can be protected with the ½″ slit, ¼ by 3/16 inch land pattern.”
The present inventor's prior U.S. Pat. No. 10,226,907 (the '907 patent) shows a background “Expandable Slit Sheet Packaging Material That Interlocks When Layered and Expanded.” In the '907 patent, the product includes a plurality of layers, with each layer having a different slit pattern for the purposes of “interlocking” between the plural layers. As explained at column 2 of the '907 patent, “the differing slit patterns produce when expanded, inclined land area that have the same number of rows per inch, but different angles of inclination of the land areas, such that adjacent layers can interlock.”While the '907 patent describes an example in which a slit length of 0.4 inches is included for one of the layers, it is notable that 1) this 0.4 inch slit length is only used in conjunction with an adjacent layer having a larger slit length of 0.5 inches, 2) this reduced slit length is not used along with a reduced distance between rows (i.e., the distance between rows is required to be the same as that of the adjacent layer with the 0.5 inch slit length). Thus, the '907 patent does not teach the improved slit sheet cushioning products of the present invention, nor the advantages therefrom.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention improve upon and overcome various problems and limitations of the related art.
The preferred embodiments overcome and improve upon the foregoing and/or other related art.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, novel expandable slit sheet paper products and methods are provided that provide novel expansion patterns. For example, in some preferred embodiments, various products and methods of providing novel alternating types of expansion patterns are provided. Towards that end, in some embodiments, unique expansion patterns are achieved by modifying the quality or characteristics of the expandable slit sheet paper. For example, in some embodiments, the expandable slit sheet paper is modified by use of specially designed blades that alter the nature of the paper in the region of the slits in a manner that the expandable slit sheet paper expands into novel and unique patterns (e.g., alternating patterns). For example, in some embodiments, the expandable slit sheet paper is modified by employing novel and advantageous extensible paper that also expands into novel and unique patterns (e.g., alternating patterns).
Among other things, these novel and unique patterns have a variety of advantages that are not achieved by existing slit sheet expandable paper.
According to some embodiments, a slit sheet paper cushioning product, comprising: at least one slit sheet paper having a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction that forms a plurality of open cells upon expansion in a machine direction, the slit sheet paper being formed from an expandable paper that expands into an alternating row expansion pattern.
In some examples, the slit sheet paper cushioning product further includes at least one of:
In some examples, the land portions that are formed at the regions between the ends of the slits in the same row of slits are formed upward and downward facing portions.
In some examples, each land portion includes a creased or angled portion aligned in between adjacent slits within the same row of slits around which angles of incline between the two portions of the land portion changes.
In some examples, the land portions in first-type rows include a first portion that extends from an edge of an open cell at a left side of the land portion upwardly to the creased or angled portion at the center of the land portion, and a second portion that extends from the creased or angled portion at the center of the land portion downwardly to an edge of an open cell at a right side of the land portion.
In some examples, the land portions within second-type rows include an opposite configuration to that of the first-type rows, and include a first portion that extends from an edge of an open cell at a left side of the land portion downwardly to an creased or angled portion at the center of the land portion, and a second portion that extends from the creased or angled portion at the center of the land portion upwardly to an edge of an open cell at a right side of the land portion, wherein the slit sheet paper cushioning product includes the first-type rows and second-type rows alternating across the slit sheet paper in an expanded state.
In some examples, the open cells have hexagonal peripheries that are bent at a central region such as to form a hexagonal shape in which the opposing land portions are closer to one another.
In some examples, the hexagonal open cells include a first half that extends along substantially a first plane with edges along one of the land portions and two of the leg portions and a second half that extends along substantially a second plane with edges along another of the land portions and two of the leg portions.
In some examples, the open cells are formed into alternating rows, with a first of the alternating rows having a row of open cells formed so as to open upwardly and a second of the alternating rows having a row of open cells formed so as to open downwardly.
According to some embodiments, a method of making the slit sheet paper cushioning product of the above embodiments/examples includes at least one of:
In some examples, the method further includes that upon expansion land regions are formed that have angles of inclination in a range from 50 to 85 degrees from the plane of the unexpanded sheet, with the land regions alternating on a row by row basis in forward and backward directions such that the slit pattern upon expansion includes an alternating cell opening pattern wherein each row opens in an opposite direction from an adjacent row.
In some examples, the method further includes providing the slit sheet paper as an extensible paper that is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 6% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 6%.
In some examples, the method further includes providing the extensible paper extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 7% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 7%.
In some examples, the slit sheet paper cushioning product of any of the embodiments/examples above includes that the slit sheet paper has a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction, wherein the slit width is from 0.45 inches plus 5% to 0.45 inches minus 33%, and the slit sheet paper is formed from an extensible paper made to be extensible in the machine direction and the cross direction without the slit pattern, the extensible paper having an extensibility within a range of 3 to 20% in the machine direction.
In some examples, the slit sheet includes spaces between rows of slits in the range of 0.1125 to 0.1688 inches. In some examples, the slit sheet includes spaces between rows of slits smaller than 0.125 inches.
In some examples, the slit sheet paper has a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction, wherein the slit width is less than 0.40 inches.
In some examples, the alternating row expansion pattern includes alternating rows with bottom-side cell openings in bottom-side rows situated on a bottom side of the expanded slit sheet paper and with top-side cell openings in top-side rows situated on a top side of the expanded slit sheet paper.
In some examples, the slit sheet paper is employed within a wall of an envelope for cushioning of the envelope.
In some embodiments, a slit sheet paper cushioning product is provided that includes: at least one slit sheet paper having a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction that forms a plurality of open cells upon expansion in a machine direction, the slit sheet paper being formed from an expandable paper that expands into an alternating row expansion pattern that includes alternating rows with bottom-side cell openings in bottom-side rows situated on a bottom side of the expanded slit sheet paper and with top-side cell openings in top-side rows situated on a top side of the expanded slit sheet paper.
In some examples, the slit sheet paper is made with an extensible paper.
In some examples, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 5%. In some examples, the extensible paper is extensible in a cross direction in a range of at least 5%. In some examples, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 6% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 6%.
In some embodiments, a method of producing a paper packaging product including a sheet of slit paper having a slit pattern, the slit pattern upon expansion forming cells that include land regions that are inclined with respect to a plane of an unexpanded sheet is performed that includes the steps of: slitting the sheet of slit paper, expanding the sheet of slit paper with the slits producing land regions that have angles of inclination from the plane of the unexpanded sheet, with the land regions alternating on a row by row basis in forward and backward directions such that the slit pattern upon expansion includes an alternating cell opening pattern wherein each row opens in an opposite direction from an adjacent row.
In some examples, the method further includes the step of: forming the slit pattern by slitting with blades. In some examples, the blades have a first wedge angle on one side of the blades and a second wedge angle on the other side of the blades.
In some examples, the method further includes that sheet of slit paper is configured to form the land regions alternating on a row by row basis in forward and backward directions and the alternating cell opening pattern wherein each row opens in an opposite direction from an adjacent row by an operator expanding the sheet of slit paper with an expander.
In some examples, the method further includes providing the sheet of slit paper with an extensible paper, having an extensibility of at least 3% in a machine direction.
In some preferred embodiments, a paper cushioning product is provided that includes: a sheet of slit paper having a slit pattern, the slit pattern upon expansion forming cells that include land regions that are inclined with respect to a plane of an unexpanded sheet; the sheet of slit paper being configured such that expanding the sheet of slit paper with the slits produces land regions that have angles of inclination from the plane of the unexpanded sheet, with the land regions alternating on a row by row basis in forward and backward directions such that the slit pattern upon expansion includes an alternating cell opening pattern wherein each row opens in an opposite direction from an adjacent row.
In some preferred embodiments, the paper cushioning product further includes at least one of a) the sheet of slit paper is extensible paper that is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 3% and/or b) the sheet of slit paper includes slits configured such that upon expansion the slit sheet paper expands into an alternating row expansion pattern.
According to some embodiments of the present invention, a slit sheet paper cushioning product is provided that includes: at least one slit sheet paper having a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction that forms a plurality of open cells upon expansion in a machine direction, the slit sheet paper being formed from an expandable paper that expands into an alternating row expansion pattern that includes alternating rows with bottom-side cell openings in bottom-side rows situated on a bottom side of the expanded slit sheet paper and with top-side cell openings in top-side rows situated on a top side of the expanded slit sheet paper. According to some embodiments, the slit sheet paper is made with an extensible paper. According to some embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 5%. According to some embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a cross direction in a range of at least 5%. According to some embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 5% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 5%. According to some embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 6% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 6%. According to some embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 7% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 7%. According to some, most preferred, embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 8% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 8%. According to some embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of between 5% to 15% and in a cross direction in a range of between 5% to 15%. According to some embodiments, the extensible paper is extensible in a machine direction in a range of between 7% to 15% and in a cross direction in a range of between 7% to 15%. According to some embodiments, the plurality of slits each have a width of between 0.35 and 0.65 inches; according to some embodiments, the plurality of slits each have a width of between 0.45 and 0.55 inches. According to some embodiments, the plurality of slits each have a width of about 0.5 inches. According to some embodiments, the plurality of slits each have a width of less than 0.5 inches. According to some embodiments, the plurality of slits each have a width of less than 0.45 inches. According to some embodiments, the plurality of slits each have a width of less than 0.4 inches.
The above and/or other aspects, features and/or advantages of various embodiments will be further appreciated in view of the following description in conjunction with the accompanying figures. Various embodiments can include and/or exclude different aspects, features and/or advantages where applicable. In addition, various embodiments can combine one or more aspect or feature of other embodiments where applicable. The descriptions of aspects, features and/or advantages of particular embodiments should not be construed as limiting other embodiments or the claims.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention are shown by a way of example, and not limitation, in the accompanying figures, in which:
In the attached drawings,
While the present invention may be embodied in many different forms, the illustrative embodiments are described herein with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as providing examples of the principles of the invention and that such examples are not intended to limit the invention to preferred embodiments described herein and/or illustrated herein.
In the preferred embodiments, the present invention provides substantially improved slit sheet cushioning products by advantageously combining novel paper properties with novel slit patterns for improved features and characteristics. In some illustrative and non-limiting example embodiments, cushioning products of the present invention can include, e.g., a novel slit sheet material in combination with extensible paper employed as, e.g., a cushioning pad or as cushioning within an envelope product, wherein the cushioning product can be substantially more resilient, but, yet, e.g., thinner for better utilization of space.
In the preferred embodiments, an expanded paper cushioning product is provided that employs an improved slit arrangement that was unviable with prior expanded slit paper products, including a compacted slit pattern with, e.g., reduced slit lengths and reduced row spacings, along with the use of a novel extensible paper.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a novel slit pattern is capable of being created that provides more cells per square foot and achieves a greater crush resistance and resiliency for cushioning. For example, the preferred embodiments have substantial advantage for wrapping of items packed within a container (e.g., use as a cushioning wrap) or as a pad for an envelope (including, in some illustrative preferred envelope embodiments, wherein the envelope includes at least an inner or outer layer of indented paper).
In some preferred embodiments, the slit paper pattern of slits advantageously has slits in the range from 0.30 to 0.45 inches (i.e., in the lengthwise dimension of the slits) and spaces between rows in the range from 0.1125 to 0.1688 inches (i.e., the distance between adjacent rows of slits). Most preferably, these embodiments are made from an extensible paper.
In some preferred embodiments, the slit paper has slits wherein the slit width is 0.45 inches plus 5%, minus 33% (i.e., here the slit width refers to the lengthwise dimension of the slits). Most preferably, again, these embodiments are also made from an extensible paper.
In some preferred embodiments, the slit pattern advantageously produces an expandable slit paper having a number of legs per square foot that is at least 20% greater than slit paper has slit (cut) widths of 0.5 inches.
In some preferred embodiments, an expanded slit paper cushioning product of the present invention has a number of legs per square foot that is at least 15% greater than slit paper that has slit (cut) widths of 0.5 inches. In some preferred embodiments, an expanded slit paper cushioning product of the present invention has such a number of legs per square foot that is in the range from 20% to 50% greater than that of slit paper having slit (cut) widths of 0.5 inches.
With the present invention, expanded slit sheets can be created having greatly improved cushioning characteristics. In some embodiments of the present invention, the improvement in cushioning characteristics can be achieved due to one or more, or all, of the following:
Additionally, with the present invention, novel and previously-unviable cushioning products can be created, such as, for example:
In some most preferred embodiments, extensible papers as set forth in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 10,669,086 are employed. Towards that end, the following paragraphs (in quotations) under this section are quoted from the '086 patent set forth details of extensible papers according to some preferred embodiments that can be employed in preferred embodiments of the present invention.
“For the purposes of the present invention, the term “extensible” as applied to paper sheets, means a paper sheet that is able to stretch in a longitudinal direction of the paper sheet upon applying a force in the longitudinal direction of the paper sheet. Illustrative extensible sheets are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,908,071, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/901,977 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,945,077), International Application No. WO 1984002936, U.S. Publication Nos. 2002/0060034, 2007/0240841 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,918,966), and U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,104,197, 3,220,116, 3,266,972, 3,269,393, 3,908,071, 6,024,832, 6,458,447, and 6,712,930, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein, as though recited in full. It should be understood that the stretching of an extensible paper must be measured in an unslit sheet of paper. As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,972, the test and characterization procedures employed in measuring elongation (extensibility) properties can be in accordance with standard TAPPI test Elongation T457. In addition, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,972, the expression “extensible papers” means a paper having an increasable elongation in the machine direction as compared to standard, non-extensible Kraft paper.”
“In some preferred embodiments, extensible paper can be produced by varying the accumulation of paper fibers by essentially slowing the paper feeding process during the drying method to trap extra fibers that make the paper appear to have microscopically sized rows of paper that you would see if one were to pleat the paper. The difference is that extensible paper's microscopic rows are adhered to each other through the use of binders and other types of adhesives in conjunction with the drying process. Reference is made to patent U.S. Application No. 2007/0240841 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,918,966) where the purpose is to create a non-creped extensible paper that does not easily disconnect from itself. In addition, the surface of the extensible paper is still fairly flat.”
“In the preferred embodiments of the present invention, the extensible paper that is employed has low extensible properties as compared to other types of extensible papers. In this regard, an optimal extensible paper enables a smooth transition from an unexpanded to the expanded slit sheet by providing a small amount of stretching at the very start of expansion of the extensible slit sheet paper material.”
“In some exemplary constructions, during expansion of a slit sheet, the force required to initiate expansion is substantially higher than the force required to continue expansion. For example, once the paper initially starts to bend at the slits, the expansion continues more easily during continued bending at the slits. The force required to continue the expansion of the slit sheet during this continued bending is dramatically reduced beyond the above-noted initial expansion. In some preferred embodiments, the extensible slit sheet paper substantially reduces the force required to initiate expansion. On the other hand, in some preferred embodiments, during the above-noted continued expansion, the extensible paper does not substantially stretch simultaneously with the process of expanding the slit sheet paper; otherwise, the expanded sheet might not optimally be made into a cushioning wrap.”
“It should be noted that in this application, all theories related to functioning of the invention are provided to facilitate appreciation of concepts of the invention, rather than by way of limitation. Extensible paper, as designed, stretches as part of an increase in paper strength. In some embodiments, the functioning of the invention involves that the extensible slit sheet paper substantially utilizes the extensible property to ease the rotating the cells into the stretched shape and to resist tearing of the slit sheet during the expansion step. This means that at the initial point at which the cell rotates (i.e., initiating rotation between legs 38a and 38b on each side of the slit and land 20) the extensible slit sheet paper is substantially enhanced by the extensible paper's ability to stretch. In some embodiments, the functioning of the invention, thus, involves that extensible papers' properties are substantially utilized at this initial point and substantially finished as soon as the cell begins to rotate into its three dimensional shape (i.e., after this initial point, the reliance on the extensible nature of the paper may be less substantial or even non-existant). After that initial point, the slit pattern properties, regardless of paper type, opens with greater ease to the point at which it forms a hexagon. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the extensible property substantially merely comes into play at the initial moment of expansion. In some other embodiments, while the extensible features of the paper comes into play most substantially at this initial point of rotation, the extensible features of the paper can have some affect during further expansion of the paper, whereby the initial point of expansion can be substantially facilitated due to extensibility and further expansion can also be, at least, somewhat facilitated due to extensibility.”
“In some of the preferred embodiments, preferable extensible papers that can be employed include extensible papers where the purpose of the extensible nature is to provide the type of stretching found for the use of multi-wall bags for heavy weight items like cement, or seed and the like. U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/0355985 (U.S. application Ser. No. 14/901,997) and U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,104,197 and 3,266,972 teach the manufacture and properties of this form of extensible paper. Further teachings can be found in “Understanding sheet extensibility”, R. S. Seth, Pulp & Paper Canada T31, 106:2 (2005) III, pages 33-40 (T31-T38). The disclosures of the foregoing patents, patent publication, and printed publication are incorporated herein by reference, as though recited in full.”
“The prior expanded slit sheet art (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,538,778, 5,667,871, 5,688,578, and 5,782,735) focused on paper strength to inhibit tearing during the expansion process and Kraft paper was satisfactory because the strength required coincided with the thickness required to make a satisfactory wrapping product. The increased strength of an expandable sheet does not contribute to or increase the value/performance of the expansion of the slit sheet material. It has now been found by the present inventor that an expandable slit sheet paper can be substantially improved by the use of an extensible sheet. In the preferred embodiments, this use of an extensible slit sheet paper advantageously provides a reduction in force required to open the slit sheet and therefore provides a faster and easier expanding process for the user of the expanded slit sheet. The unexpected benefit resulting from the reduction in force at the very start of the expansion of the slit sheet provides an unexpected improvement to the slit sheet packaging product and renders the employment of the extensible paper highly unique. Notably, the prior expanded slit sheet paper persisted in and was widely used in the marketplace for decades without the contemplation of the present invention or the potential advantages therefrom.”
“As set forth in this application, the present inventor has discovered that the force needed to expand an expandable slit sheet paper is far greater than the force required to expand an extensible slit sheet paper. By way of example, a 50 pound Kraft paper expandable slit sheet that is 15″ wide prior to expansion requires approximately 4-6 pounds or 0.4 pounds per inch, whereas the force required to expand an extensible slit sheet of the same paper weight is 0.15-0.22 pounds per inch. This is a marked difference between the papers. Kraft paper has the strength to provide an acceptable expandable slit sheet. However, unexpectedly, the extensible slit sheet imparts an ease of expansion that greatly reduces the force required to expand the slit sheet, not based on the main purpose for extensible paper which is to increase its tensile strength but, rather, its capability to stretch. Since extensible paper is higher in cost and Kraft paper was strong enough, it was not previously known that extensible paper could be of benefit for making slit paper sheets of the types found in, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,538,778, 5,667,871, 5,688,578, and 5,782,735, and U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 15/428,144. For example, it was not appreciated that an extensible slit sheet could have provided an equivalent strength to light weight, thin papers that previously had no applicability as a wrapping product. Light weight Kraft paper tears more easily than heavier weights of Kraft paper. It has now been found that the extensible paper enables the use of the lighter weight expanded slit-sheet papers that also advantageously provide gentler cushioning required by fragile items when a slit sheet is expanded, in contrast to the more rigid cushioning provided by heavier weight expanded slit-sheet papers.”
“Reference is particularly made to the graph of Table 1 on page 5 of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/0355985 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,945,077) as if recited in full, that describes paper strength based on certain manufacturing techniques. Within the graph is a column describing elongation at the point of paper break (or tearing of fibers) separated into two sub columns of the machine direction (MD) and cross direction (CD), also referred to as transverse direction. The elongation percentage of Table 1 ranges from 5.3% to 7.1% in the cross direction (CD) and 3.3% to 10.6% in the machine direction (MD).”
“Reference is also made to U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,972 within Table III of column 5 which references elongation in the percentage range from 3.7% to 4.6% in the CD or cross direction and 9.7% to 11.1% in the machine direction.”
“In both '985 and '972, the variations are based on the manufacturing process that places an emphasis on tensile strength and stretch in either the cross direction or machine direction accordingly.”
“The present inventor has discovered that for the purposes of expanding an extensible slit sheet paper for use as a packaging wrap and/or void fill, machine direction extensible ranges from 1%-9% provide an adequate extensibility, with 1% to 6% preferred, and 1% to 4% most highly preferred. The lower the extensibility coincides with lower costs of the paper per square foot. As indicated above, it should be understood that extensibility is measured on unslit paper.”
“In some alternative embodiments, machine direction extensibility ranges of the extendible slit sheet paper can have ranges of:
“For the purposes of expanding the slit sheet paper for use as a packaging wrap and/or void fill, it has been found that cross direction extensible ranges from 1%-5% provides an adequate extensibility with 1% to 4% preferred, and 1% to 3% most highly preferred.”
“In some alternative embodiments, cross direction extensibility ranges of the extendible slit sheet paper can have ranges of: a) from 1.5%-5%, or more preferably from 1.5% to 4%, or even more preferably from 1.5% to 3%; or b) from 2%-5%, or more preferably from 2% to 4%, or even more preferably from 2% to 3%.”
“In combination with the extensible paper, a smaller, lighter weight, and recyclable version of an expander can be employed (such as, e.g., made entirely or substantially entirely with recyclable cardboard in some illustrative embodiments). This expands the market to customers that use a very small amount of wrap as compared to the industrial market. It also provides for a less expensive expansion device to be employed for expanding the slit paper. Additionally, it enhances the ease of use by the packer by providing for less ripping during the wrapping process that occurs when the tension is not properly set. This occurs as the roll, during its continued use, becomes smaller and lighter in weight. As the roll of expanded slit sheet becomes lighter the tension required increases. Thus, there need for a varying tensioning method. With the use of the extensible paper, the tension required is significantly decreased and the strength of the paper is increased. Both benefit the person wrapping by making the tensioning required much less precise to the point at which, a single tension setting can be used with little or no adjustment. If the tension is set higher than necessary, the increase in strength from the extensible paper keeps the product from tearing and therefore makes it easier for the packer to use. Therefore, the packer can make fewer adjustments as the slit sheet roll becomes smaller and smaller.”
“The reduction in the force required to expand the slit paper enables a new product to be created using lighter weight papers. In the past, expanded slit sheet paper is primarily used as a wrapping product whereas its use as a void fill would be in limited circumstances due to void fill being typically the cheapest, that is, the lowest cost of all packaging products. The increased strength of the extensible sheet enables the use of a thinner and lighter weight slit sheet paper as a void fill product. If the expanded slit sheet is not being used as a wrap, then the thicker 0.005″, 50 pounds per 3,000 square feet paper and above is not required and a lighter weight 0.003-0.0045″ thick, 30-40 pounds per 3,000 square feet paper can be used as void fill. It can also be used to provide cushioning that other paper void fill products have not been able to provide. It has now been found that even though the extensible paper has a 10% higher price, the use of a thinner paper provides much more square footage per ton and more than compensates for the increased cost of the extensible paper as compared to Kraft paper.”
“The Following are Citations from Clupak's paper patent (U.S. Pat. No. 9,945,077):”
Heavy-duty Clupak paper having a basis weight of 84.9 g/m2 was made using a gap-former paper-making machine equipped with a Clupak system, at a paper-making speed of 480 m/min and using, as material, 100% unbleached softwood Kraft pulp that had been beaten at high concentration of 28%. The negative draw on the Clupak was set to −4.5%.”
Heavy-duty Clupak paper was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the paper had a basis weight of 76.1 g/m2 and the negative draw on the Clupak was set to −6.0%.”
Heavy-duty Clupak paper was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the paper had a basis weight of 73.4 g/m2 and the negative draw on the Clupak was set to −4.0%.”
Heavy-duty Clupak paper was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the paper had a basis weight of 85.0 g/m2, the negative draw on the Clupak was set to −4.0%, and the pulp blend consisted of 90% unbleached softwood Kraft pulp and 10% unbleached hardwood Kraft pulp.”
Heavy-duty Clupak paper was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the paper had a basis weight of 71.9 g/m2 and the negative draw on the Clupak was set to −10.0%.”
Heavy-duty Clupak paper was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the paper had a basis weight of 85.4 g/m2 and the negative draw on the Clupak was set to −1.0%.”
Heavy-duty Kraft paper was made in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the paper had a basis weight of 76.0 g/m2 and the Clupak process was not performed.”
“Evaluation Methods:
“Looking at the properties of the Clupak papers in Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 as well as those of the Kraft paper in Comparative Example 3, as shown in Table 1, the Clupak papers described in Examples 1 to 4 exhibit a good balance of various strengths and elongation and have excellent strength overall; on the other hand, the Clupak papers described in Comparative Examples 1 and 2 and Kraft paper described in Comparative Example 3 exhibit a poor balance of various strengths and elongation and cannot be said to have excellent strength overall.”
“The Following are Citations from “Understanding Sheet Extensibility”, R. S. Seth, (Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada 3800 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada V6S 2L9) Pulp & Paper Canada T31, 106:2 (2005) III, pages 33-40 (T31-T38):
Tensile strength and extensibility or stretch are two important failure properties of paper. They are defined by the end-point of the sheet's load-elongation curve (
“This report deals with the factors that control sheet stretch.”
“Factors that Control Sheet Stretch:
A specimen under tensile load extends more, the longer it is. Therefore, extensibility or stretch or strain at failure as a material property, is expressed as a percentage of the original specimen length (
“Role of Bonding:
Regardless of how bonding between the fibres is increased—by wet pressing, beating or refining, or additives, the sheet stretch of a furnish generally increases with increased fibre-fibre bonding. This is observed for almost all papermaking fibres—chemical, mechanical, wood, non-wood, or recycled. The reasons are as follows. Fibres have a certain “stretch-potential”. However, this potential is realized in paper only when fibres form a bonded network. If the bonding is weak, the network fails before the stretch-potential is realized; the sheet stretch is low. As bonding in the network is increased, the stretch-potential of fibres is increasingly realized, the sheet stretch increases. Since increased inter-fibre bonding also increases sheet tensile strength, an increase in stretch with tensile strength is often observed for handsheets (
“The Following are Citations from Trani et al.'s Extensible Paper Patent (U.S. Pat. No. 7,918,966):”
“Extensible paper is a known paper which, because of special treatment during its production, presents considerable extensibility both in the longitudinal direction (i.e. in the direction of its advancement along the production line) and in the transverse direction (i.e. in the direction perpendicular to the preceding). This treatment consists essentially of passing the paper web not yet formed and presenting a moisture content of about 35%/45% between two rollers rotating at different speeds. One of these rollers, generally the lower roller, is made of rubber and is rotated at lower speed, while the upper roller is made of steel and comprises in its cylindrical surface a continuous spiral-shaped groove. The different material nature and the different speed of the two rollers results in a sort of longitudinal accumulation of the paper forming material and prepares it for longitudinal extensibility, by an amount which can reach 15-20%. At the same time, the spiral groove performs a double function: on the one hand it causes a sort of transverse accumulation of the material forming the paper to prepare it for transverse extensibility. By an amount which can reach 10-15%. On the other band the spiral groove contributes to maintaining longitudinal advancement of the processed paper web along the machine.”
“The Following are Citations from Cabell et al.'s Extensible Paper Web Patent (U.S. Pat. No. 6,458,447):”
“Tensile and Percent Stretch Test:
The tensile test is used for measuring force versus percent elongation properties. The tests are performed on a Thwing Albert Intellect II-STD Model No. 1451-24PGB, available from the Thwing-Albert Co. of Philadelphia, Pa.”
“The samples used for this test are 1” wide×6″ long with the long axis of the sample cut parallel to the direction of maximum extensibility of the sample. The sample should be cut With a sharp Exacto knife or some suitably sharp cutting device design to cut a precise 1″ wide sample. (If there is more than one direction of extensibility of the material, samples should be taken parallel to representative direction of elongation). The sample should be cut so that an area representative of the symmetry of the overall pattern of the deformed region is represented. There will be cases (due to variations in either the size of the deformed portion or the relative geometries of regions 1 and 2) in which it will be necessary to cut either larger or smaller samples than is suggested herein. In this case, it is very important to note (along with any data reported) the size of the sample, which area of the deformed region it was taken from and preferably include a schematic of the representative area used for the sample. Three samples of a given material are tested.”
“The Following are Citations from Cramer et al.'s Extensible Paper Patent (U.S. Pat. No. 3,266,972):”
“Test and Characterization Procedures:
The test and characterization procedures employed in measuring various properties reported herein are listed in Table I below. Unless otherwise indicated the code letter numerals indicate standard TAPPI tests.”
“Elongation T457:
By the expression “extensible papers” is meant a paper having an increased elongation (generally a minimum of about 6%) in the machine direction.
In runs IA and IB of this example, rosin size (0.3% by weight based on the weight of pl up) is added at the beater and the pH is adjusted to 4.5 with alum. The stock, having a consistency of 3.6% is dropped to the beater chest and is then pumped to a second chest, passed through a Jordan and continuously diluted with “white water” at the Fourdrinier headbox to a consistency of 0.3%. Properties measured on the various papers is reported in Table III. Each paper has a basis weight of from 49.4 to 50.3 pounds per ream.”
“The Following are Citations from Trani et al.'s Multilayer Paper Material Patent (U.S. Pat. No. 8,518,522):”
“These and other objects which will be apparent from the ensuing description are attained according to the invention by a multilayer papery material comprising at least one first three dimensional structure sheet exhibiting reliefs having maximum sizes which are lower than the width of the original sheet, said reliefs being obtained through localized stretching of said first sheet which has an original degree of extensibility of not less than 5% in all the directions, and at least one second sheet made of papery material coupled to said first structure sheet and defining empty spaces with the reliefs thereof.”
“As it can be seen from the figures, in the embodiment shown in
“The Following are Citations from Trani et al.'s Extensible Paper Material Application (U.S. Application No. 2007/0240841):”
“Extensible paper is a known paper which, because of special treatment during its production, presents considerable extensibility both in the longitudinal direction (i.e. in the direction of its advancement along the production line) and in the transverse direction (i.e. in the direction perpendicular to the preceding). This treatment consists essentially of passing the paper Web, not yet formed and presenting a moisture content of about 35%/45%, between two rollers rotating at different speeds. One of these rollers, generally the lower roller, is made of rubber and is rotated at lower speed, While the upper roller is made of steel and comprises in its cylindrical surface a continuous spiral-shaped groove. The different material nature and the different speed of the two rollers results in a sort of longitudinal accumulation of the paper forming material and prepares it for longitudinal extensibility, by an amount which can reach 15-20%. At the same time, the spiral groove performs a double function: on the one hand it causes a sort of transverse accumulation of the material forming the paper, to prepare it for transverse extensibility, by an amount which can reach 10-15%. On the other hand the spiral groove contributes to maintaining longitudinal advancement of the processed paper web along the machine.”
Further details related to extensible papers that can be employed in some preferred embodiments are also quoted in the '086 patent as follows.
“The following is a direct quote of the paragraph on column 1, lines 4-19, of U.S. Pat. No. 3,908,071 incorporated by reference in the preceding paragraph: “Extensible (compacted) paper produced, for example, in accordance with the apparatus and process disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,624,245 has certain well recognized advantages and commercial uses. Such paper is subjected, while in a partially moistened condition, to compressive compaction in the direction of web movement (machine direction or MD) between a pressure nip, thus compacting and forcing the fibers together to produce an inherent stretchability without creping. Compacted paper has improved tensile energy absorption (TEA) burst and tear characteristics which are highly desirable for such end uses as the manufacture of paper sacks.” In addition, the following is a direct quote of the Abstract of U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,832 incorporated by reference in the preceding paragraph: “A method for producing extensible paper, comprising the following stages: feeding a mix of vegetable fibres to a kneader member, mixing the mix with water in the kneader, beating the fibres to obtain a pulp, transferring the beaten pulp into a flow chest, feeding the beaten pulp from the flow chest onto a paper web formation cloth with consequent reduction of the water percentage by gravity and vacuum, pressing the web, with consequent further reduction of its water content, initial drying of the paper web to a substantially constant moisture content of between 15% and 65%, compacting, final drying to a moisture content of between 15% and 4%, preferably 10%-8%, glazing, wherein: the beating stage is carried out by rubbing the fibres in a multistage unit to obtain a pulp having a degree of beating of at least 30.degree. SR, the compacting stage is carried out between at least a pair of rollers of which one is of hard material comprising circumferential surface ribs and driven at greater speed, and the other is of soft material with a smooth surface and driven at lesser speed.” In addition, the following is a direct quote of the 2nd paragraph of the Background section of U.S. Pat. No. 9,945,077 incorporated by reference in the preceding paragraph: “On the other hand, Clupak refers to equipment that inserts a paper web between a roll and an endless rubber blanket to compress the paper web with a nip bar and the rubber blanket, while at the same time the pre-stretched blanket shrinks to cause the paper web to also shrink and thereby increase its breaking elongation, and this equipment is used to provide increased breaking elongation to kraft paper used in heavy packaging applications as mentioned above.” In addition, the following is a direct quote of the paragraph on column 2, lines 41-56 of U.S. Pat. No. 3,104,197 incorporated by reference in the preceding paragraph: “The use of rubber or rubberous material in conjunction with a hard surface in the manner described is known in the treatment of paper as well as fabrics but only in a general way and the present invention includes the use of rubber considerably softer and more elastic than previously used. Also of great importance in the production of an extensible paper by creping it in this manner is the differential in speeds at which the rolls are driven. If the proper combination of hard and soft surfaces is provided, a semi-dry paper web passing through the nip of the rolls will be carried by the contracting rubber against the direction of web travel toward the nip and over the surface of the hard roll. This creates a uniformly compressed crepe in the paper web giving toughness, pliability and extensibility.”
“The following are direct quotes of paragraphs [0003] and [0028] of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2016/0355985 incorporated by reference in the preceding paragraph: (1) [0003] On the other hand, Clupak refers to equipment that inserts a paper web between a roll and an endless rubber blanket to compress the paper web with a nip bar and the rubber blanket, while at the same time the pre-stretched blanket shrinks to cause the paper web to also shrink and thereby increase its breaking elongation, and this equipment is used to provide increased breaking elongation to kraft paper used in heavy packaging applications as mentioned above;” and “[0028] The manufacturing method using this Clupak system is such that a paper web is inserted between a roll and an endless rubber blanket to compress the paper web with a nip bar and the rubber blanket, while at the same time the pre-stretched blanket shrinks to cause the paper web to also shrink and thereby increase its breaking elongation. The Clupak system allows for adjustment of the breaking elongation of kraft paper in the longitudinal direction according to the ratio of the manufacturing speed on the inlet side of the Clupak system and manufacturing speed on the outlet side of the Clupak system, and also according to the pressurization force applied by the nip bar.”
In some embodiments, extensible paper employed can involve one or more of the following features, as set forth in the '086 patent.
Example 1: An extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product, comprising: a roll of slit sheet paper having a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction that forms a plurality of open cells upon expansion in a machine direction, said roll resisting pulling of a length of slit sheet paper along the machine direction to enable expansion of the length of slit sheet paper in the machine direction, said slit sheet paper being formed from a paper that is extensible in the machine direction and the cross direction prior to providing said slit pattern, said extensible paper having an extensible range of 3 to 20% in the machine direction prior to providing said slit pattern.
Example 2: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible range is not less than 5% in both the machine direction and cross direction.
Example 3: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible range is 3-15% in the machine direction.
Example 4: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said slit sheet paper is configured such that expansion is performed by applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said open cells.
Example 5: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 2, wherein said slit sheet paper is configured such that expansion is performed by applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said open cells.
Example 6: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 5, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 7: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 8: A shipping package comprising: a wrapped object, said wrapped object being wrapped in at least two layers of an expanded slit sheet paper wrap having interlocking hexagonal cells, said slit sheet paper having a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction that forms a plurality of hexagonal cells upon expansion in a machine direction and being expanded by applying an expansion force and wrapped to form said at least two layers of expanded slit sheet paper wrap having interlocking hexagonal cells, said slit sheet paper being formed from a paper that is extensible in the machine direction and the cross direction prior to providing said slit pattern, said extensible paper having an extensible range of 3 to 20% in the machine direction prior to providing said slit pattern.
Example 9: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said extensible range is not less than 5% in both the machine direction and cross direction.
Example 10: The shipping package of claim 8, wherein said extensible range is 3-15% in the machine direction.
Example 11: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said slit sheet paper is configured such that expansion is performed by applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said hexagonal cells.
Example 12: The shipping package of example 11, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 13: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 14: A method of expanding and wrapping a slit sheet paper that upon expansion and wrapping forms two or more layers of interlocking hexagonal cells, comprising the steps of: providing said slit sheet paper having a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction that forms a plurality of hexagonal cells upon expansion in a machine direction, wherein said slit sheet paper being formed from a paper that is extensible in the machine direction and the cross direction prior to providing said slit pattern, said extensible paper having an extensible range of 3 to 20% in the machine direction prior to providing said slit pattern, expanding said slit sheet paper, and wrapping said expanded slit sheet paper to form adjacent layers, said adjacent layers being in interlocking contact, whereby expanded layers resist contraction and tearing.
Example 15: The method of example 14, wherein said extensible range is not less than 5% in both the machine direction and cross direction.
Example 16: The method of example 14, wherein said extensible range is 3-15% in the machine direction.
Example 17: The method of example 14, wherein said step of expanding comprises applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said hexagonal cells.
Example 18: The method of example 17, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 19: The method of example 14, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 20: The method of example 14, wherein the step of wrapping said slit sheet paper to form said adjacent layers, comprises: wrapping the expanded slit sheet paper around an object and forming said two or more layers of overlying interlocking hexagonal cells around said object, said overlying interlocking hexagonal cells being in direct contact substantially across the width of the layers.
Example 21: The method of example 20, wherein said extensible range is 3-15% in the machine direction and not less than 5% in the cross direction.
Example 22: The method of example 20, wherein said extensible range is 3-9% in the machine direction and not less than 5% in the cross direction.
Example 23: The method of example 20, wherein said step of expanding comprises applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said hexagonal cells.
Example 24: The method of example 21, wherein said step of expanding comprises applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said hexagonal cells.
Example 25: A method of protecting an object for shipping by wrapping and cushioning said object in an expanded slit sheet material, comprising the steps of: a) providing a roll with a sheet of expandable sheet material wound therearound, said sheet of expandable sheet material being flexible, non-woven fibrous material, and having a plurality of spaced parallel rows of individual slits extending in a cross direction, said flexible, non-woven fibrous material being a paper that is extensible in the machine direction and the cross direction prior to providing said slits, said extensible paper having an extensible range of 3 to 20% in the machine direction prior to providing said slits; b) expanding a length of said expandable sheet material unrolled from said roll by applying an expansion force to form at least one expanded slit sheet material having an array of openings; c) wrapping said at least one expanded slit sheet material around an object; and d) placing the wrapped object in a package.
Example 26: The method of example 25, wherein said extensible range is 3-15% in the machine direction and not less than 5% in the cross direction.
Example 27: The method of example 25, wherein said extensible range is 3-9% in the machine direction and not less than 5% in the cross direction.
Example 28: The method of example 25, wherein said step of expanding a length of said expandable sheet material comprises applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch.
Example 29: The method of example 26, wherein said step of expanding a length of said expandable sheet material comprises applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch.
Example 30: The method of example 25, wherein the slit extensible paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 31: The method of example 28, wherein the slit extensible paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 32: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible range is 3-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example 33: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said extensible range is 3-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example 34: The method of example 14, wherein said extensible range is 3-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example: 35: The method of example 25, wherein said extensible range is 3-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example 36: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible range is 3.3-10.6% in the machine direction.
Example 37: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said extensible range is 3.3-10.6% in the machine direction.
Example 38: The method of example 14, wherein said extensible range is 3.3-10.6% in the machine direction.
Example 39: The method of example 25, wherein said extensible range is 3.3-10.6% in the machine direction.
Example 40: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible range is 9.7-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example 41: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said extensible range is 9.7-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example 42: The method of example 14, wherein said extensible range is 9.7-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example 43: The method of example 25, wherein said extensible range is 9.7-11.1% in the machine direction.
Example 44: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible paper is formed by imparting a treatment prior to providing the slit pattern comprising inserting said paper between a roll and an endless pre-stretched blanket to compress the paper with a nip bar and the blanket (or otherwise compressing the paper between two different (e.g., differently moving) surfaces, such as between two different rollers).
Example 45: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said extensible paper is formed by imparting a treatment prior to providing the slit pattern comprising inserting said paper between a roll and an endless pre-stretched blanket to compress the paper with a nip bar and the blanket (or otherwise compressing the paper between two different (e.g., differently moving) surfaces, such as between two different rollers).
Example 46: The method of example 14, wherein said extensible paper is formed by imparting a treatment prior to providing the slit pattern comprising inserting said paper between a roll and an endless pre-stretched blanket to compress the paper with a nip bar and the blanket (or otherwise compressing the paper between two different (e.g., differently moving) surfaces, such as between two different rollers).
Example 47: The method of example 25, wherein said extensible paper is formed by imparting a treatment prior to providing the slits comprising inserting said paper between a roll and an endless pre-stretched blanket to compress the paper with a nip bar and the blanket (or otherwise compressing the paper between two different (e.g., differently moving) surfaces, such as between two different rollers).
Example 48: The method of example 14, wherein said step of expanding includes a user manually expanding said slit sheet material.
Example 49: The method of example 48, wherein said user manually expanding said slit sheet material includes the user manually grasping said slit sheet material and drawing and unrolling the slit sheet material from a roll against resistance from the roll.
Example 50: The method of example 25, wherein said user manually expanding a length of said expandable sheet material unrolled from the roll includes the user manually grasping the expandable sheet material and drawing and unrolling the expandable sheet material from the roll against resistance from the roll.
Example 51: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible paper is a nonwoven fibrous material with fibre-to-fibre bonding that resists tearing upon 3-15% expansion in the machine direction as measured prior to providing the slit pattern.
Example 52: The shipping package of example 8, wherein said extensible paper is a nonwoven fibrous material with fibre-to-fibre bonding that resists tearing upon 3-15% expansion in the machine direction as measured prior to providing the slit pattern.
Example 53: The method of example 14, wherein said extensible paper is a nonwoven fibrous material with fibre-to-fibre bonding that resists tearing upon 3-15% expansion in the machine direction as measured prior to providing the slit pattern.
Example 54: The method of example 25, wherein said nonwoven fibrous material comprises fibre-to-fibre bonding that resists tearing upon 3-15% expansion in the machine direction as measured prior to providing the slits.
Example 55: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said roll of slit sheet paper is wound on a cylindrical core, and said length of slit sheet paper extends from said roll of slit sheet paper.
Example 56: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible range is 5-15% in a cross-direction.
Example 57: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said extensible range is 7.1-15% in a cross-direction.
Example 58: An extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product, comprising: a length of slit sheet paper having a slit pattern including a plurality of slits extending in a cross direction that forms a plurality of open cells upon expansion in a machine direction, said slit sheet paper being formed from a paper that is extensible in the machine direction and the cross direction prior to providing the slit pattern, said extensible paper having an extensible range of 3 to 20% in the machine direction prior to providing the slit pattern.
Example 59: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 58, further including a resister that resists pulling of the length of slit sheet paper along the machine direction to enable expansion of the length of slit sheet paper in the machine direction.
Example 60: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 59, wherein said resister is a roll of slit sheet paper from which said length of slit sheet paper extends.
Example 61: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 58, wherein said extensible range is not less than 5% in both the machine direction and cross direction.
Example 62: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 58, wherein said extensible range is 3-15% in the machine direction.
Example 63: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 58, wherein said slit sheet paper is configured such that expansion is performed by applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said open cells.
Example 64: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 58, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft.
Example 65: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 58, wherein said extensible sleet sheet paper cushioning product is a shipping package.
Example 66: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 65, wherein said slit sheet paper is arranged to protect an object placed inside said shipping package.
Example 67: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 66, wherein said slit sheet paper is arranged to extend around the object placed inside said shipping package.
Example 68: A method of using the extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 66, comprising shipping the shipping package with an object protected by said extensible paper inside said shipping package.
Example 69: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 1, wherein said a slit pattern is configured to form a plurality of hexagonal cells upon expansion in a machine direction.
Example 70: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 69, wherein said hexagonal cells are three-dimensional hexagonal cells with substantially rectangular land portions situated at an inclined angle transverse to an original plane of the slit sheet paper, and leg portions connecting the land portions.
Example 71: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 58, wherein said a slit pattern is configured to form a plurality of hexagonal cells upon expansion in a machine direction.
Example 72: The extensible slit sheet paper cushioning product of example 71, wherein said hexagonal cells are three-dimensional hexagonal cells with substantially rectangular land portions situated at an inclined angle transverse to an original plane of the slit sheet paper, and leg portions connecting the land portions.
According to some preferred embodiments of the invention, novel extensible sleet sheet paper cushioning product according preferred embodiments of the present invention can be employed in the manufacture of envelopes. In some preferred embodiments, the envelopes can be of the type disclosed in applicant's pending U.S. application Ser. No. 16/531,017 (the '017 application), filed May 6, 2020, and also filed as PCT/US2019/045027 (published Feb. 13, 2020 as WO2020/033275), the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference, as though recited in full herein.
By way of illustration,
As shown in
Although this example includes two internal expanded slit paper sheets 102, 103, in some preferred embodiments, which employ the novel slit sheet paper of the present invention, a single layer of expanded slit sheet paper can be employed. For example, the layers 104 and 101 can, in some embodiments of the present invention, be located on opposite sides of a single layer of expanded slit sheet paper. Moreover, as indicated above, although
According to some preferred embodiments of the invention, novel extensible sleet sheet paper cushioning product according preferred embodiments of the present invention can be employed in the manufacture of products (such as, for example, envelopes or various other products) include embossed paper. In some preferred embodiments, products employing such embossed paper can be of the type disclosed in applicant's pending U.S. application Ser. No. 16/870,195, filed May 8, 2020, and also filed as PCT/US2020/32146, as well as in the above-noted '017 application, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference, as though recited in full herein.
In the preferred embodiments, the term “embossed” means to raise and/or to lower a region of a sheet of paper. Most preferably, embossments involve raised and/or lowered regions of a sheet of paper which are raised and/or lowered by the application of a force such as to press the paper to assume an embossed shape in which the pressure causes deformation in the sheet of paper such as to have a shape including such raised and/or lowered regions. In some preferred embodiments, the sheet of paper is initially substantially planar and without the raised and/or lowered regions of the embossments in an initial state, and, then, the sheet of paper is pressed to cause deformation in the sheet of paper including raised and/or lowered regions. These raised and/or lowered regions from the original plane of the original planar sheet of paper are referred to, in the most preferred embodiments, as “embossed” regions or “embossments.” By way of example, in the most preferred embodiments, embossments are created by pressing an initial sheet (e.g., a planar or substantially planar sheet) between opposing pressing surfaces, such as, e.g., (1) between die plates that are reciprocated relative to one another to press the surface of the planar sheet, wherein the die plates have a pattern of raised and lowered regions (e.g., male and female regions) that create a cross pressure on the face of the planar sheet to cause the sheet to deform and form embossments and/or (2) between two rollers wherein the rollers have a pattern of raised and lowered regions (e.g., male and female regions) that create a cross pressure on the face of the planar sheet to cause the sheet to deform and form embossments. In some embodiments, embossments can involve pressure applied by a single reciprocated die plate that has a raised/lowered embossment pattern that presses against a first surface of the paper, while an opposite side of the paper is pressed or supported by a resilient (e.g., rubber) member that flexibly receives the raised and/or lowered portions to cooperative cause embossments in the paper sheet. Similarly, in some embodiments, embossments can involve pressure applied by a single roll die that has a raised/lowered embossment pattern that presses against a first surface of the paper, while an opposite side of the paper is pressed or supported by a resilient (e.g., rubber) roll member, or other surface member, such as a conveyor or other member, that flexibly receives the raised and/or lowered portions to cooperative cause embossments in the paper sheet
In some preferred embodiments, embossments are formed in a repeating pattern along a conveyed sheet of paper that is conveyed from an initial roll. In some preferred embodiments, the embossments define discrete shapes that are displaced from the original plane of the paper (e.g., raised and/or lowered) within separated regions along the face of the sheet of paper. In some preferred embodiments, these discrete regions can have an irregular shape, while in some embodiments these discrete regions can have a circular shape, elliptical shape, oval shape, polygonal shape, triangular shape, square shape, pentagonal shape, hexagonal shape, octagonal shape and/or other shapes. In the most preferred embodiments, the embossments have a hexagonal shape. Here, the terminology “shape” of the embossments in the above paragraph refers to the shape of the embossments as viewed downwardly towards a face of the paper sheet. It should be understood that, as seen in a side view, such embossments have a different shape.
Novel Expansion Pattern
For reference,
For further reference,
For even further reference,
In some embodiments of the present invention which employ a novel slit pattern as described herein, an expansion pattern similar to that shown in
However, in some embodiments of the present invention, an expansion pattern similar to that shown in
Moreover, while the alternating row expansion pattern can be employed in some preferred embodiments of the invention that include novel reduced-sized slit patterns described herein, this alternating row expansion pattern provides a new and advantageous inventive feature that can be implemented in the context of any desired slit size patterns, such as, e.g., slit size patterns with 0.5 inch slit lengths or even larger in some preferred embodiments.
Notably, this type of alternating row expansion pattern can be achieved by employing an extensible slit sheet paper from an extensible paper that has sufficient extensibility characteristics. Towards that end, the extensibility preferably is adjusted to have sufficient extensibility in both the machine direction and the cross direction to achieve such an alternating row expansion pattern. For example, with a slit sheet paper having 0.5 inch slit lengths, 0.1875 land lengths (between slits within the same row), and row spacing of 0.125 inches, this type of alternating row expansion pattern has been achieved by employing extensible paper having an extensibility of both i) 8.8 in the machine direction and ii) 8.8 in the cross direction. In some examples, this expansion pattern can be achieved employing 30 #, 40 # or 50 # extensible paper sheets having such a slit arrangement.
In some other embodiments, with such a slit sheet paper having these 0.5 inch slit lengths, extensibility of at least about 6% in both the machine direction and the cross direction can advantageously achieve such an alternating row expansion pattern.
In some preferred embodiments, such an alternating row expansion pattern can be achieved with slit patterns employing extensible paper that is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 5% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 5%, or, in some more preferred embodiments, that is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 6% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 6%, or, in some more preferred embodiments, that is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 7% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 7%, or, in some more preferred embodiments, that is extensible in a machine direction in a range of at least 8% and in a cross direction in a range of at least 8%.
Notably, the present inventor discovered that this novel alternating row expansion pattern could be created by implementation of extensible paper even with the same original slit pattern of an unexpanded sheet. In particular, even when the same slit pattern arrangement is provided on an unexpanded paper (including slit lengths, spacing between slits in the same rows of slits, and spacings between adjacent rows of slits), the present inventor discovered that the expansion pattern could be adjusted so as to achieve an alternating row expansion pattern by, e.g., modifying the paper to comprising an extensible paper.
As illustrated in
As also illustrated in
Similarly, as also shown in
Furthermore, in the expansion pattern of
However, in contrast to the embodiment shown in
In particular, as shown in
The present inventor has also discovered that this alternating row expansion pattern has a number of substantial advantages and benefits over the expansion pattern shown in
While the open cells 26 of the example shown in
For further reference,
As shown in
As shown in
In the embodiment shown in, e.g.,
In order to expand an expandable slit sheet paper, an expansion force is required to pull the paper to cause the paper to expand and to open the cells. Existing expandable slit sheet paper can be somewhat difficult to expand and requires a substantially higher force for expansion. Additionally, existing expandable slit sheet paper requires a larger slit length in order to enable opening of the cells. Varying slit patterns with expanded slit sheet material require varying force to stretch. The present slit pattern used in the market requires approximately 6 pounds of pulling force for slit material that is 15 inches wide utilizing 50 # Kraft paper. However, the present inventor has discovered that extensible paper reduces the force required for the same slit pattern and paper weight to, e.g., 2 pounds.
The present inventor has also discovered that this decrease enables further slit pattern opportunities that can provide greater resiliency and a reduced thickness is desired where, in the past, they would be too difficult to stretch manually and provide a burden to the automated expanding equipment. In general terms, the present inventor has discovered that a 10% reduction in slit, land, and row size increases the number of supporting legs by 23.7%—a more than doubling of the strength of the material. This provides cushioning solutions where greater resiliency of the same or smaller leg height can be accomplished.
Additionally, and well known in paper die cutting art, leg height impacts stiffness. As the leg height is reduced, the leg becomes stiffer. This is due to the fiber length that becomes more difficult to bow or flex as the height becomes shorter. According to preferred embodiments of the present invention, the leg height, the number of legs per square foot, and the paper weight is balanced to provide optimal cushioning while providing the least amount of pulling strength to open.
The automated equipment is also impacted with a heavy pulling strength as it requires more maintenance changes to the hook rollers due to them wearing out proportionally to the pulling force required. With the advent of the present inventor's discovery of the unique and unexpected advantages of extensible paper employed in expandable slit sheet products, these limitations based on pulling force are greatly diminished and enable greater market opportunities where greater strength is required.
Presently there is a move towards environmentally friendly packaging products that includes the use of non-powered equipment eliminating the need for electricity.
The use of a manual system to dispense rolls of expanded slit material that can have varying properties of cushioning and provides greater flexibility for wrapping a wider variety of weights and densities of fragile items. As an example, with the prior art slit sheet material, the number of wraps on a bottle of wine is too great for a cost advantage over bubble. However, with the present inventor's implementation of an extensible-based wrap having a greater number of legs per square foot (e.g., according to embodiments of the present invention), fewer wraps are required to obtain the same level of cushioning. Accordingly, very substantial benefits and advancements are achieved.
In some illustrative applications, the preferred embodiments of the present invention can be employed in the creation of substantially improved, novel and advantageous envelopes. Towards that end, in some embodiments, a padded envelope can be created employing aspects of the present invention, providing a reduced thickness, but increased resilience and improved crush resistance of the envelope (or pouch or bag), along with greater efficiencies of storage and freight while providing increased resiliency, and while maintaining production speed and less downtime with the use of the reduced stretching force required due to the novel use of extensible paper.
Presently, the crush strength for the current commercial pattern using a 0.5″ slit is 2.2 pounds per square inch of strength.
According to some preferred embodiments of the present invention, a preferred reduced slit pattern utilizing 50 # Kraft paper with a slit pattern of 0.45″ slit (i.e., length of slit), 0.1688″ land (i.e., distance between adjacent slits in a lengthwise direction of the slits), 0.1125″ row width (i.e., distance between adjacent rows of slits) is provided. In some embodiments, such a configuration yields 2.72-2.92 pounds of per inch of crush strength, which yields a 27% increase in strength with a 10% decrease in thickness from 0.1875″ to 0.16875″. In the most preferred implementations of this slit pattern, the paper employed is an extensible paper.
According to some other embodiments of the present invention, another preferred slit pattern is 0.40″ slit, 0.15″ land, 0.1125″ row width. In some embodiments, this latter configuration yields 3.1-3.3 pounds per inch crush strength, which yields a 40% increase in crush strength with a 10% decrease in thickness from 0.1875″ to 0.16875.” In the most preferred implementations of this slit pattern, the paper employed is an extensible paper.
According to the preferred embodiments, this increase in strength can advantageously be used to allow for a reduced thickness of the expanded slit sheet paper, which can, thus, provide, e.g., an equivalent crush strength while providing for a reduction in overall height. For example, in the above illustrative embodiments employing a 50 # paper, the use of 40 # paper would reduce the leg stiffness, but would reduce the cost of the paper.
According to some other preferred embodiments, an expandable slit paper sheet includes a pattern of slits having slit lengths in the range from 0.30 to 0.45 inches and spaces between rows of slits in the range from 0.1125 to 0.1688. In the most preferred implementations of this slit pattern, the paper employed is an extensible paper.
According to some other preferred embodiments, an expandable slit paper sheet includes a pattern of slits having slit lengths in the range of 0.45 inches plus 5% (e.g., 0.4725 inches) to 0.45 inches minus 33% (e.g., 0.30 inches). In the most preferred implementations of this slit pattern, the paper employed is an extensible paper.
According to some other preferred embodiments, an expandable slit paper sheet includes a pattern of slits that upon expansion produces an expandable slit paper having a number of legs per square foot that is at least 20% greater than a slit paper sheet with slit lengths of 0.5 inches which is configured to create hexagonal cells (e.g., with equilateral hexagons).
According to some other preferred embodiments, an expandable slit paper sheet includes a pattern of slits that upon expansion produces an expandable slit paper having a number of legs per square foot that is at least 15% greater than a slit paper sheet with slit lengths of 0.5 inches which is configured to create hexagonal cells (e.g., with equilateral hexagons), and, more preferably, in the range from 20% to 50% greater than such slit paper with slit lengths of 0.5 inches which is configured to create hexagonal cells (e.g., with equilateral hexagons)
In the most preferred embodiments, the paper employed is an extensible paper as described herein-above. The use of such extensible paper highly advantageously enables a reduced slit pattern size in comparison to prior slit patterns. Notably, non-extensible paper has limitations in relation to the viable sizes and dimensions of the slits, and such non-extensible paper does not enable reduction in sizes to that of preferred embodiments described herein because such prior papers would be inoperable and would not adequately expand if such small sizes were attempted to be employed.
Additionally, while the present inventor has discovered novel means to improve cushioning characteristics of expandable slit sheet paper, which involves “reducing” the slit pattern dimensions, it is notable that this reduction of slit pattern dimensions is “not only” unviable with prior expandable slit sheet paper (i.e., which could not achieve such small sizes), but is also “counter-intuitive” to the existing understanding of cushioning properties afforded by such explandable slit sheet papers. Notably, the cushioning of expandable slit sheet papers is directly related to the “width” of the expandable slit sheet paper in an expanded state. Accordingly, for enhancing cushioning, those in the art have sought to actually “increase” this width of the expanded slit sheet paper. However, the present inventor discovered means by which smaller slit patterns could be achieved (e.g., via the use of the extensible paper) and that such smaller slit patterns with such extensible papers could, in fact, provide enhance cushioning despite the losses in cushioning due to the reduced “width” of the expandable slit sheet paper. Additionally, the present inventor also discovered other desirable applications and uses of such novel expandable slit sheet paper.
Notably, non-extensible expanded slit paper sheets do not operate appropriately with slit lengths of less than about 0.5 inches. Accordingly, for expandable slit paper sheets of smaller slit sizes according to the present invention, an extensible paper according to the present invention is advantageously employed.
According to some more preferred embodiments of the invention, a slit pattern is provided which includes slit lengths of 0.35″ slits (i.e., the lengths of the slits), 0.13125″ lands (i.e., the distances between adjacent slits in the same row of slits in a lengthwise direction of the slits), and 0.0875″ row width (i.e., the distances between adjacent rows of slits). In this regard, such a slit pattern is preferably implemented within a pattern of slits similar to that shown in, e.g.,
While, preferably, all of the expanded slit sheet paper would include a same slit pattern throughout the sheet, in some embodiments such a pattern could be employed within a portion or region of the paper and/or some regions of the paper may potentially include some differences in the pattern. Additionally, although the slit lengths and dimensions are preferably consistently the same as indicated above, in some embodiments, there could be some variations in sizes, positions of the slits as long as operation of the product is not impeded.
In some embodiments, a slit pattern having 0.35″ slits, 0.13125″ lands, and 0.0875″ row width can yield 3.52-3.82 pounds per inch crush strength which yields a 60% increase in crush strength with a 30% decrease in thickness from 0.1875″ to 0.1125.”
In some preferred implementations of all of the embodiments of the invention described above, the lands distance (i.e., the distance SS shown in
In some preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be about ⅓ the length of the slits plus or minus about 25%. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be about ⅓ the length of the slits plus or minus about 20%. In some preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be about ⅓ the length of the slits plus or minus about 15%. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be about ⅓ the length of the slits plus or minus about 10%.
In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be between about ⅓ the length of the slits to 25% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be between about ⅓ the length of the slits to 20% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be between about ⅓ the length of the slits to 15% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be between about ⅓ the length of the slits to 10% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits.
In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be between about 5% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits to about 25% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be between about 10% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits to about 20% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands would be between about 10% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits to about 15% greater than ⅓ the length of the slits. In some other preferred embodiments, the lengths of the lands are such that the slit length SL is approximately set in relation to the split spacing SS as follows: SL=2.6667×SS.
In some preferred embodiments, the dimensions of the expandable slit sheet paper are proportionally reduced from an expandable slit sheet paper having a 0.5″ slit length, a ⅛″ (0.125 inch) spacing between rows, and a spacing between slits within the same row (i.e., land length) of 3/16″ (0.1875 inch) as follows: a) the row spacing is proportionally reduced by a ratio SL(new)/0.5 and b) the slit spacing is set at SL(new) divided by 2.6667. For example, some preferred embodiments include dimensions as set forth below Table A:
In some preferred embodiments, the corresponding row spacings of the Examples A to I in the above Table A are substantially as shown in Table A. In some preferred embodiments, the row spacings of Examples A to I can be substantially as shown in Table A plus or minus 20%, or, more preferably, substantially as shown in Table A plus or minus 15%, or, more preferably, substantially as shown in Table A plus or minus 10%, or, more preferably, substantially as shown in Table A plus or minus 5%.
Furthermore, in some preferred embodiments, the corresponding row spacings of the Examples A to I in the above Table A are, more preferably, within a range that is the same or lower than the row spacings shown in Table A for the respective slit lengths; notably, with reduced slit length, there can be increased difficulty to open the cells, which difficulty is increased with larger row spacings. Accordingly, as the slit lengths are decreased, in some preferred embodiments, the row spacing decreases an extent that is proportionally the same or more than the proportional decrease in the slit length. Notably, while the present inventor discovered that slit lengths could be viably decreased by the use of extensible papers as described herein, the present inventor also noted that even with extensible papers reduction in slit lengths can increase difficulty to open cells in the event that row spacings are proportionally too large.
Although the preceding Table A shows row spacings that are substantially reduced well below the ⅛″ (0.125 inch) row spacing of the background art, in some alternative embodiments, the row spacings for various embodiments of the invention (including that of, e.g., Examples A to I in the preceding Table) can still be larger. That is, while the present invention very advantageously enables such a reduced row spacing due to the greatly improved cushioning characteristics that enable the row spacing to be reduced (e.g., the reduction in cushioning resultant from reduced row spacing can be offset by the improved cushioning characteristics of the present invention), such a substantial reduction is not necessarily required, as long as the cell structure can be opened for expansion.
For example, in some alternative embodiments, any of the embodiments of the invention having slit lengths within a range of 0.40 to 0.25 can employ row spacings that are less than that of the existing art, such as, e.g., less than 0.125 inches, or, more preferably, less than 0.12 inches, or, more preferably, less than 0.115 inches, or, more preferably, less than 0.1125 inches, or, more preferably, less than 0.0875 inches, or, in some embodiments more preferably, less than 0.08 inches.
In some other alternative embodiments, the various embodiments of the invention shown in the preceding Table A can be modified such that:
In all of the embodiments of the present invention, the paper is, most preferably, an extensible paper. In various embodiments, the extensible paper is an extensible paper according to any of the embodiments or examples of extensible paper disclosed herein.
In various embodiments, the extendable paper can employ extensibility according to any of the embodiments described herein, including, e.g., any of the Example 1 to Example 72 described above. Moreover, the extendable paper can include features of any of the extensible papers described herein in relation to, e.g., opening forces required, paper weight or type, etc. However, as described herein, in embodiments that are to employ an alternating row expansion pattern, it is noted that the extensibility is adapted to achieve the alternating row expansion pattern as described herein.
In some illustrative examples, in some embodiments, an extensible paper is employed having an extensible range of 3 to 20% in the machine direction. In some illustrative examples, in some embodiments, an extensible paper is employed having an extensible range of 3 to 20% in the cross direction. In some illustrative examples, in some embodiments, an extensible paper is employed having an extensible range of 3 to 15% in the machine direction. In some illustrative examples, in some embodiments, an extensible paper is employed having an extensible range of 3 to 15% in the cross direction. In some illustrative examples, in some embodiments, an extensible paper is employed having an extensible range of 7 to 15% in the machine direction. In some illustrative examples, in some embodiments, an extensible paper is employed having an extensible range of 7 to 15% in the cross direction. In some illustrative examples, the extensible range is not less than 5% in both the machine direction and cross direction.
Moreover, in some illustrative examples, the slit sheet paper is an extensible slit sheet configured such that expansion is performed by applying an expansion force of 0.15 to 0.22 pounds per inch to form said open cells.
Moreover, in some illustrative examples, the slit sheet paper is an extensible slit sheet, wherein said slit sheet paper has a weight, prior to expansion, from about 30 to 50 pounds per 3,000 sq. ft. Notably, all of the embodiments of the invention described herein (e.g., the various slit patterns, including slit lengths, slit spacings, row spacings, etc.) can be employed in various implementations of papers with weights within this range in some embodiments, such as, e.g., on 30 # paper, 40 # paper, 50 # paper, and on any papers within this range. Moreover, in other embodiments, papers can be employed lower than this range of 30 # to 50#, such as, e.g., 20 # or less, or larger than this range, such as, e.g., 60 # or more. However, in preferred embodiments, due to enhanced cushioning characteristics achieved, papers with lower weights can be employed while obtaining the same or even greater cushioning characteristics than prior expandable slit sheet papers.
As indicated above, with the present invention, expanded slit sheets can be created having greatly improved cushioning characteristics. The improvement in cushioning characteristics can be achieved due to one or more, or all of the following:
As indicated above, with the present invention, novel and previously-unviable cushioning products can be created, such as, for example:
In this section, embodiments set forth in parent application Ser. No. 16/212,536 are presented. In the following discussion, all reference numbers discussed below relate to
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a method of producing at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, the pair of interlocking adjacent layers being formed of a sheet of slit paper having a slit pattern, the slit pattern upon expansion, forming cells that include land regions that are inclined with respect to a plane of an unexpanded sheet, the method comprising the step of: slitting the sheet of slit paper with beveled blades that have a first wedge angle on one side of the blades and a second wedge angle on the other side of the blades, wherein the first wedge angle is wider than the second wedge angle to produce slits that upon expansion, produce the lands regions that have angles of it in a range for 50 to 8 degrees.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the method of producing at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, the method further comprising the step of: forming the slit pattern by slitting with the blades against a rotating anvil, the blades having an included angle, wherein the paper is recycled paper.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention the method of producing at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of paper packaging product, wherein the first wedge angle is in the range from about 40 to 50 degrees, and the second wedge angle is in the range from about 25 to 35 degrees with respect to a center line of the blades.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the method of producing at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product wherein the first wedge angle s in the range from about 40 to 45 degrees, and the second wedge angle is the range from about 30 to 35 degrees with respect to a center line of the blades.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the method of producing at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, wherein a difference between the first wedge angle and the second wedge angle is least 10 degrees.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the method of producing at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, wherein the second wedge angle is at least 25 degrees.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, an apparatus for at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, the pair of interlocking adjacent layers being formed of a sheet of slit paper, the sheet of slit paper having a slit pattern, the slit pattern upon expansion, forming cells that include land regions that are inclined with respect to a plane of an unexpanded sheet, the apparatus comprising: a first means for slitting the sheet of slit paper with beveled blades that have a first wedge angle on one side of the blades and a second wedge angle on the other side of the blades, wherein the first wedge angle is wider than the second wedge angle to produce slits that upon expansion, produce the lands regions that have angles of inclination in a range for 50 to 85 degrees.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the apparatus for at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, the apparatus further comprising: a second means for forming the slit pattern by slitting with the blades against a rotating anvil, the blades having an included wherein the paper is recycled paper.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the apparatus for at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, wherein the first wedge angle is in the range from about 40 to 60 degrees, and the second wedge angle is in the range from about 25 to 35 degrees with respect to a center line of the blades
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the apparatus for at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product, wherein the first wedge angle is in the range from about 40 to 45 degrees, and the second wedge angle is in the range from about 30 to 35 degrees with respect to a center line of the blades.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the apparatus for at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product wherein a difference between the first wedge angle and the second wedge angle is at least 10 degrees.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the apparatus for at least a pair of interlocking adjacent layers of a paper packaging product according to claim 7, wherein the second wedge angle is at least 25 degrees.
While the present invention may be embodied in many different forms, the illustrative embodiments are described herein with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as providing examples of the principles of the invention and that such examples are not intended to limit the invention to preferred embodiments described herein and/or illustrated herein.
Where the definition of terms departs from the commonly used meaning of the term, applicant intends to utilize the definitions provided below, unless specifically indicated otherwise.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “slit sheet material” refers to the use of offset rows of slits that form a hexagonal, or the like, three dimensional paper materiel that is flexible and can form to the shape of an item needing wrapping.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “cell” means the hollow three dimensional shapes that are created when the slit sheet material is expanded longitudinally.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “lead wall” means the part of the cell that is the full height of the hexagonal shape created from the expansion of the slit sheet material.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “angle of inclination” means the angle that the land areas of cells form with respect to the plane of the unexpanded slit sheets, wherein the cells land areas that are inclined relative to unexpanded sheets, and wherein the angle of inclination of one of the adjacent expanded sheets is the mirror image of the angle of inclination of the other expanded sheet.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “connecting wall” means the part of the cell that is half the height of the cell created from the expansion of the slit sheet material.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “cell size” means the open space dimension created when expending the slit sheet material.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “slit row spacing” means the distance between the rows of slit and un-slit patterns within the slit sheet material.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “Kraft paper” means the industry name of paper that is measured in weight for every three thousand square feat of material. Thus the weight of 50 # Kraft Paper would be the weight of 3000 square feet of paper.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “basis weight” means the specification relating to paper that measures the weight of a certain square foot area of paper. Thus the basis weight of 3000 square feet of Kraft Paper weighing 50 pounds equals a 50 # basis weight. The basis weight of Tissue paper is based on 2,880 square feet.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “recycled paper” means material that is substantially made from recycled paper in the 90% range or more and is paper that has been returned to the manufacturing process, having once or more been made into a paper product, and remade into a paper sheet.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “paper fibers” are the individual component of paper that makes up a paper sheet.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “nesting” means the grouping of cells onto or into one other such that an upper slit sheet material cell can fit within the lower slit sheet material cell to the point at which the thickness gain is not substantial.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “interlocking” means the grouping of cells onto or into one another is such that an upper slit sheet material cell can nest within the lower slit sheet material cell only to the point at which the average thickness gain of two layers is no less than 70% of the thickness of both layers of a two layer pair and preferably no less than 80% of the thickness of both layers of a two layer pair. For example, if each layer is 0.5 inches thick, then the average thickness would be no less than 0.7 inches and preferably no than 0.8 inches.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “adjacent” means that two layers are immediately adjoining, that is, one layer overlays the other without intervening space and are touching. Layers that nest or interlock to any degree and having no intervening layers, are accordingly, in contact with each other and therefore adjacent.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “pattern of cells of expanded sheets” means the cell shape configurations such as hexagonal or oval, and cell dimensions such as leg length or width. The term “pattern” means physical characteristics and dimensions and is not inclusive of decorative er ornamental features of the design of a pattern.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “average thickness” is employed to indicate that since some nesting may be present layers of sheet that are within the definition of “interlocking” as employed here, the thickness of two adjacent layers can vary. Average thickness is measured as the sum of the thicknesses measured at a plurality of linear intervals, divided by the number of intervals in the plurality of linear intervals. Thus, if thickness measurements are taken every inch over a length of two feet, then the sum of the measurements divided by 24 equals the average thickness.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “interlocking adjacent layers” means that layers are nested to an extent that the contact between adjacent layers is sufficient to resist contraction of expanded sheets. When two layers are interlocked, the contraction from expanded to unexpanded due to the paper's memory is restricted because one layer is pulling in a first direction and the second layer is pulling in the opposite direction. The degree of nesting depends upon the rigidity of the paper of each of the two layers, and preferably provides no more than a 10% overlap (nesting) of the layers such that the thickness of the two layers is no less than 90% of the sum of the thickness of each layer.
For the purposes of the present invention, the phrase “paper width after expansion” means the width of the sheet of paper after expansion of the slit paper sheet. The decrease of the width of the sheet of paper after expansion is referred to as “necking down”. The “percent of necking down” is the percent decrease in paper width after expansion. Thus, a 25 inch width sheet which necks down to 20 inches would be necked down 20%.
For the purposes of the present invention, the phrase “paper width differential” means the difference in width of two adjacent layers of slip paper sheets. Since different slit patterns will yield different amounts of necking down, the paper width differential prior to the expansion step must be sufficient to yield little or no paper width differential after the expansion step. It should be understood that the sheets of expanded paper can be trimmed down to negate any paper width differential post expansion. However, this would constitute a waste of paper end require an additional step or steps, and accordingly, it is preferable to negate any paper width differential by determining a pre-expansion paper width differential that achieves, in combination with the slit patterns of each of two adjacent sheets, a substantially identical paper widths post expansion.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “Operator” means the person that operates the machinery that automatically expands the slit sheet material that dispenses the product towards the operator.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “switch back” means the reversal of the angle of inclination of the land at some point or points along the length of a sheet of expanded slit sheet material. A reversal of the angle of inclination from +60” to −60° (60° to 120°) constitutes a switch back.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “wedge effect” means the cutting of a slit to form a slit having a substantially greater angled cut along one edge of the slit than the other edge of the slit.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “soft paper” means the particular grade of paper used for absorbing purposes, such as tissues, drying cloths, paper toweling, napkins and handkerchiefs. While these paper products, unlike their woven fabric counterparts, are typically intended for disposable use, in the present invention soft paper is employed for its soft feel, smooth structure, and good strength in both dry and wet states.
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “erratically opening” as employed herein, means the random, disorderly, disordered, chaotic, scrambled opening of cells of slit paper sheets during expansion of the paper, such that cells of adjacent lagers of expanded sheet interlock rather than nest.
The new art provides a stronger and longer life solution for manufacturing slit sheet expanded material described in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/480,319. The disclosures of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/480,319 fled Sep. 8, 2014, and Ser. No. 15/001,168 filed Jan. 19, 2016, and Ser. No. 15/820,514 filed Nov. 22, 2017 are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, and recited herein as if in full as part of the description the present invention.
Slit Sheet Materials
For the purposes the present invention, the descriptions of the paper and slit patterns within the embodiment of U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,871 can be used within this application. The material can be as described in the '871 patent, except that the two differently sized slit patterns are employed in the present invention, rather than just the one pattern of the '871 patent. These two slit patterns substantially negate the nesting problem associated with the prior art U.S. Pat. No. 5,667,871.
Further information relating to the paper which can be used in the present invention, slit patterns, and the expansion process is found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,538,778, 5,667,871, 5,688,578, and 5,782,735, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein, as though recited in full.
Each slit pattern will require varying paper strength and thickness to perfect its crush strength and ease of stretching within the automated expander.
The slit pattern dimensions set forth below are one example of the composite products from the two or more varying slit sheet materials. There are a number of slit sheet variations that will work to inhibit nesting and the specific dimensions and shapes created below should not limit the patterns that can be used to make the new art. The critical feature is that the slit patterns of adjacent layers differ in slit length, spacing between slits in a row, and/or the spacing between rows of slits.
The paper used to manufacture the slit sheet material is preferred to be recycled and is in the range of 30-80 pounds in basis weight dependent upon the cell size of the slit sheet expanded material. Virgin paper has longer fibers and will produce a firmer product with equivalent basis weight as recycled paper. Again, depending on the cushioning required one may use a 30 pound recycled pager to obtain a very soft cushion and alternating between recycled and virgin as the paper weight goes up fine tunes the cushioning effect. Additionally, a soft cushion recycled paper can be used for one sheet of the pair of sheets and the other can be a higher weight recycled paper or virgin paper. Kraft paper is manufactured according to the Tappi T-410 (standard of 3,000 Square feet of material per basis weight. As an example a Kraft paper with a basis weight of 40 means that 3,000 square feet will weigh 40 pounds. Interestingly the paper is about 0.004 inches thick but this can vary based on crushing methods to produce different surfaces.
In the case of a cushioning product made from Kraft paper the ideal paper weight, depending on the cushioning requirements is 30 to 90 pounds.
It is preferred to use the slit pattern that is approximately three-to-one in size between the length of the slit portion and the un-slit portion of the slit sheet materiel. In this instance a ½″ slit portion followed by a 3/16″ un-slit portion is a preferred pattern in the first row. Each row is ⅛″ apart and bisects or is transverse to the direction of manufacturing the slit sheet material. Each slit pattern row below is offset to the above pattern such that the slit portion bisects the unslit pattern, of the upper row and so forth. This alternating pattern enables the paper to be expanded in to the web of hexagonal, diamond, square, or round shaped three dimensional cells that are created dependent upon the specific slit pattern. A hexagonal pattern is created with the approximate three-to-one slit to unslit lengths. It has been established that the hexagonal shape is the strongest of all the cell shapes and therefore is the preferred embodiment to the new art. There are exceptions when a softer cushioning material is required where one of the slit sheet materials is a hexagonal with the adjoining layer slit sheet designed to be a square. In this instance the preferred embodiment is for both layers to substantially create hexagonal cells.
The second layer of slit sheet material will be of the same three dimensional thickness. The thickness can be created from the spacing of the rows. In this instance the spacing is ⅛″ thus creating ¼″ long cells. Because these cells can only rotate short of 90 degrees toward a vertical orientation, the total height is approximately 3/16″ overall. The lead wall of the cell is the portion of the cell that makes up the full depth of the slit sheet when expanded. There are two lead walls created no matter what shape the cells create or slit pattern used. These two lead walls face the direction of manufacture and the surface area is made up of the un-slit area within the row and the space between the rows times 2. The depth of the lead wall can also be described as the unslit space between every other set of rows or between the first and third rows.
The overall height of the expanded slit sheet material can also be described as a series of rows such that the first row of slits at position “O” is followed by its offset un-slit portion of the row underneath at position ⅛″ below and not until the third row appears and the offset again places a slit at position ¼″, thereby creating a total height of ¼″ for the lead walls of the hexagonal cell.
The first slit sheet pattern creates a ¼″ tall lead wall with each hexagonal side approximately being 3/18″ long. The second slit sheet pattern is also 1/″ tall by using the ⅛″ row spacing. The legs of the cell are approximately 10 to 30% less or more to create an interlocking composite product. In this case the preferred size would be 0.4″ slit×0.15″ unslit creating a cell that will be 20% smaller than the first slit sheet pattern.
The second expanded slit sheet pattern creates a cell that easily could fit inside the first expanded slit sheet materiel but is inhibited by the increase in quantity of the smaller cell size causing 1.2 cells trying to fit within one cell of the first expanded sheet which, is impossible.
In order for the operator to receive both slit sheet expanded materials at the same speed a special expander is required. The first expended sheet layer expands from 1″ to approximately 2⅛″ inches depending upon paper strength and thickness. In the present invention the 60 pound basis weight paper expands to the 2⅛″ inches for the ½″× 3/16″ first slit sheet layer. This is an approximately 213% increase in the length of the slit sheet material and the expander will need create this exact expansion property for the first layer.
The second layer will be twenty percent smaller in size and therefore will expand 193% in length. Therefore the second expansion rollers within the expander machinery will have a reduced expansion ratio to accommodate this smaller amount of expansion. This reduced expansion ratio would therefore automatically reduce the smaller secondary web layer speed exiting from the expander. To maintain the same exiling speed for both layers the back rollers that set the overall exit speed will have to be adjusted to 20% faster for the second layer.
Additionally, slight variations in cell size, of 5 to 10%, can be opened with the same Velcro to rubber roller ratio as the target cell size due to the slipping effect of the Velcro rollers. As the cell size grows the effect is minimized and either a larger cell is not opened fully for maximum benefit or a small cell shows tears or complete tearing of the slit sheet material.
With only a slight cell size variation the paper width does not have to be exact such that if one web is slightly wider by no more then 5 to 10% then the efficiency of wrapping is maintained. This would make the loading of the expander easier as the upper web could be the lower web and visa-verse and the only difference would the cell size on the upper web may change from smaller to larger or visa-versa.
Two expanded slit sheets or layers of a single sheet with a tissue separator have a thickness that is theoretically 3/16″+ 3/16″= 6/16 (0.375″), but has been measured to be 11/32″ or 0.344′. By way of contrast two interlocked layers of expanded sheet material, in accordance with the present invention measured at 3/16″+ 3/16″ to produce a thickness of 5/16 or 0.3125″. The loss of thickness of the two interlocked layers of expanded slit paper represents the amount of interlocking of the two adjacent, overlaid sheets of expanded slit paper of the present invention.
While this represents a 9% loss of thickness, it has been found that in use, the expanded slit sheets with a tissue separator tends to flatten due to the cells having limited rigidity under a load and has a tendency to retract. By way of contrast, the interlocking design of the present invention, as compared to the tissue separated design of the prior art, is more resistant to deformation under load, more resilient, and resists retraction. It has been found that in use, the design of the present invention produces a wrap that is thicker than the tissue separated design of the prior art, presumably because of its ability to retain its thickness, in contrast to the tissue separator configuration. The tissue separated design of the prior art, has been found to generally retain less than 75% of its expanded length, whereas the crisscross pattern of the present invention tends to retain greater than 75% of its fully expanded length.
In another 12 layers with zero nesting has a thickness of 2.25″, were each expanded sheet layer has a thickness of 0.1875″ (0.1875×12=2.25″. example 12 layers have a thickness of about 2″, representing a loss of thickness of about 11%. Thus, preferably, the nesting is limited to 10 to 20% and most preferably it is limited to 9 to 15%.
Blade Design
The use of a center bevel sharpened blade is well known for flatbed die cutting, where the downward pressure is absolutely vertical. The blade is supported on both sides of the sharpened edge versus a side bevel sharpening that produces a straight side and a wedge side. In the rotary die cutting process of the present invention, the side bevel blade rotates to the vertical and therefore, there is a time where it is impacting the paper prior to absolutely vertical. This adds a longitudinal pressure that can damage the blade. It has now been found that it is best if there is a bevel on both sides of the blade in the formation of expanded slit paper sheets.
However, the center bevel design limits the control of the cell direction as both sides of the blade are identical in wedge effect and therefore, can create inconsistent/erratic cell openings but on a less controlled basis. Previously, the center bevel blade of equal angles, as illustrated in FIG. 16 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/480,319, blade 1600, created erratically opened cells in an uncontrolled pattern. The side bevel blades 1602 and 1604 of
In accordance with some preferred embodiments of the present invention, there is a substantial improvement of the useful life of the slit forming blades that are employed to produce either uniformly or erratically opened cells in a controlled manner. This is achieved by constructing a wedge angle that is different on each side of the blade. The wider wedge will have the greater effect on the paper and therefore will open the cell in the desired direction dependent upon which direction it is facing. This design can create erratically opened cells on a row by row basis by alternating the forward or backward direction of the most pronounced wedge side of the blade and conversely, the blades can be oriented to always have the greatest wedge in only one direction to produce uniformly opened cells.
When the blades are oriented such that the rows of wider wedge all face forward, uniformly opened cells are created. If the blades are oriented such that the first row of blades face the wider wedge forward and the second row of blades face the wider wedge backward with each subsequent row alternating back and forth, then the cells are caused to open erratically. The first-row wedge effect force the cells to open forward while the second row will force the cells to open backward and so on. Similarly, a random blade orientation can be used to produce a random, chaotic opening of cells.
In both instances, the instant art center bevel design is engineered to direct the cells where previously it was only feasible with a side bevel sharpened blade, as taught in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/480,319 filed Sep. 8, 2014.
Angle 106 preferably in the range from about 40-50°, and angle 106 is preferably in the range from about 25-35° with respect to the center line 107 of blade 103. More preferably, angle 106 is in the range from about 40-45°, and angle 105 is in the range from 30-35°. Preferably, angles 105 and 106 differ by at least 10° and more preferably differ by at least 10° and most preferably, by at least 15°. Preferably, angle 106 is at least 25°.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
While illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described herein, the present invention is not limited to the various preferred embodiments described herein, but includes any and all embodiments having equivalent elements, modifications, omissions, combinations (e.g., of aspects across various embodiments), adaptations and/or alterations as would be appreciated by those in the art based on the present disclosure. The limitations in the claims are to be interpreted broadly based on the language employed in the claims and not limited to examples described in the present specification or during the prosecution of the application, which examples are to be construed as non-exclusive. For example, in the present disclosure, the term “preferably” is non-exclusive and means “preferably, but not limited to.” In this disclosure and during the prosecution of this application, means-plus-function or step-plus-function limitations will only be employed where for a specific claim limitation all of the following conditions are present in that limitation: a) “means for” or “step for” is expressly recited; b) a corresponding function is expressly recited; and c) structure, material or acts that support that structure are not recited. In this disclosure and during the prosecution of this application, the terminology “present invention” or “invention” may be used as a reference to one or more aspect within the present disclosure. The language present invention or invention should not be improperly interpreted as an identification of criticality, should not be improperly interpreted as applying across all aspects or embodiments (i.e., it should be understood that the present invention has a number of aspects and embodiments), and should not be improperly interpreted as limiting the scope of the application or claims. In this disclosure and during the prosecution of this application, the terminology “embodiment” can be used to describe any aspect, feature, process or step, any combination thereof, and/or any portion thereof, etc. In some examples, various embodiments may include overlapping features. In this disclosure, the following abbreviated terminology may be employed: “e.g.” which means “for example.”
The use of individual numerical values is stated as approximations as though the values were preceded by the word “about”, “substantially”, or “approximately.” Similarly, the numerical values in the various ranges specified in this application, unless expressly indicated otherwise, are stated as approximations as though the minimum and maximum values within the stated ranges were both preceded by the word “about”, “substantially”, or “approximately.” In this manner, variations above and below the stated ranges can be used to achieve substantially the same results as values within the ranges. As used herein, the terms “about”, “substantially”, and “approximately” when referring to a numerical value shall have their plain and ordinary meanings to a person of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed subject matter is most closely related or the art relevant to the range or element at issue. The amount of broadening from the strict numerical boundary depends upon many factors. For example, some of the factors which may be considered include the criticality of the element and/or the effect a given amount of variation will have on the performance of the claimed subject matter, as well as other considerations known to those of skill in the art. As used herein, the use of differing amounts of significant digits for different numerical values is not meant to limit how the use of the words “about”, “substantially”, or “approximately” will serve to broaden a particular numerical value or range. Thus, as a general matter, “about”, “substantially”, or “approximately” broaden the numerical value. Also, the disclosure of ranges is intended as a continuous range including every value between the minimum and maximum values plus the broadening of the range afforded by the use of the term “about”, “substantially”, or “approximately”. Thus, recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. To the extent that determining a given amount of variation of some the factors such as the criticality of the slit patterns, paper width differential pre- and post-expansion, paper weights and type, as well as other considerations known to those of skill in the art to which the disclosed subject matter is most closely related or the art relevant to the range or element at issue will have on the performance of the claimed subject matter, is not considered to be within the ability of one of ordinary skill in the art, or is not explicitly stated in the claims, then the terms “about”, “substantially”, and “approximately” should be understood to mean the numerical value, plus or minus 15%.
It is to be understood that any ranges, ratios and ranges of ratios that can be formed by, or derived from, any of the data disclosed herein represent further embodiments of the present disclosure and are included as part of the disclosure as though they were explicitly set forth. This includes ranges that can be formed that do or do not include a finite upper and/or lower boundary. Accordingly, a person of ordinary skill in the art most closely related to a particular range, ratio or range of ratios will appreciate that such values are unambiguously derivable from the data presented herein.
The present application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/212,536, filed Dec. 6, 2018, which is a non-provisional of U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/595,473, filed Dec. 6, 2017. The present application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/929,843, filed Jul. 15, 2020, which is a) a non-provisional of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/874,163, filed Jul. 15, 2019, b) a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/872,813, filed May 12, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/018,702, filed Jun. 26, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,669,086, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/524,905, filed Jun. 26, 2017, c) a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/274,028, filed on Feb. 12, 2019, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/480,319, filed Sep. 8, 2014, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/874,873. The entire disclosures of each-and-every one of the above-listed priority applications are incorporated herein by references as though recited herein in full. The entire disclosures of a) U.S. Pat. No. 10,669,086, issued Jun. 2, 2020, b), c) U.S. Pat. No. 10,226,907, issued on Mar. 12, 2019, d) U.S. application Ser. No. 16/274,028, filed Feb. 12, 2019, as a divisional of U.S. Pat. No. 10,226,907, and e) Ser. No. 16/870,195, filed May 8, 2020, entitled “Extensible Paper and its Use in the Production of Expanded Slit Packaging Wrap and Void Fill Products” are each incorporated by reference herein in their entireties, as though recited in full herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 782977 | Madden | Feb 1905 | A |
| 1650424 | Burgess | Nov 1927 | A |
| 1912681 | Baker | Jun 1933 | A |
| 1999282 | Clemens | Apr 1935 | A |
| 2996425 | Hamilton | Aug 1961 | A |
| 3065785 | Taber | Nov 1962 | A |
| 3104197 | Sangho | Sep 1963 | A |
| 3220116 | Freuler | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3266972 | Cramer | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3269393 | Ackermann | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3329562 | Schaefer | Jul 1967 | A |
| 3357172 | Evans | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3523865 | Ihrman | Aug 1970 | A |
| 3554068 | Schwartz | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3708853 | Humen et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3762629 | Bruno | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3813981 | Faltin | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3908071 | Heim et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3958751 | Bruno | May 1976 | A |
| 3968287 | Balk | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4040899 | Emerson | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4105724 | Talbot | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4230036 | Groome | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4259385 | Keller | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4426343 | Vittone et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4462292 | Pearl | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4550046 | Miller | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4596541 | Ward, Sr. et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4615671 | Bernal | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4832228 | Hickey | May 1989 | A |
| 4921118 | Gass | May 1990 | A |
| 4989487 | Staley | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5001017 | Alhamad et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5061344 | Wedin et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5365819 | Maida et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5399049 | Abe et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5538778 | Hurwitz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544473 | Maida et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5647257 | Maida et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5667135 | Schaefer | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5667871 | Goodrich et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5688578 | Goodrich | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5782735 | Goodrich et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5906149 | Montenegro Criado | May 1999 | A |
| 5910079 | Watanabe | Jun 1999 | A |
| 6024832 | Trani et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6117062 | Alhamad | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6416623 | Hollmark et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6458447 | Cabell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6712930 | Koivukunnas | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6989075 | Kao et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 7045196 | Hill | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7918966 | Trani et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8486507 | De Luca et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8518522 | Trani et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8613993 | Kuchar | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 9945077 | Hashiguchi et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 10226907 | Goodrich | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10227907 | Alano et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10669086 | Goodrich | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 11034120 | Goodrich | Jun 2021 | B1 |
| 11383906 | Goodrich | Jul 2022 | B2 |
| 11401090 | Goodrich | Aug 2022 | B2 |
| 20020060034 | Hollmark et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174630 | Goodrich | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20040056080 | Johansson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040076798 | Larsson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20070240841 | Trani et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20100196633 | Kuchar | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100330330 | Luca et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20120248177 | Beaulieu et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120266568 | Prud'homme et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20140027553 | Page et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130997 | Klerelid | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166661 | Goodrich | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140329049 | Zhang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150122866 | Kuchar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150140265 | Page et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150151895 | Zhang | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150176303 | Kuchar et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20160067938 | Goodrich | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160355985 | Hashiguchi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170203866 | Goodrich | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170313017 | Cheich et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170341845 | Mulvey et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180079161 | Cheich | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180229910 | Kohn et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180370702 | Goodrich | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190100369 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20210101356 | Cheich et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2251477 | Oct 1997 | CA |
| 337723 | Apr 1959 | CH |
| 1134687 | Oct 1996 | CN |
| 1152274 | Jun 1997 | CN |
| 201990066 | Sep 2011 | CN |
| 202244644 | May 2012 | CN |
| 102733266 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 4340531 | Jun 1994 | DE |
| 0768948 | Apr 1997 | EP |
| 1215036 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 951132 | Mar 1964 | GB |
| 1534342 | Dec 1978 | GB |
| 36-4149 | Apr 1961 | JP |
| 50065388 | Jun 1975 | JP |
| 50098194 | Aug 1975 | JP |
| 1-226574 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| 01226574 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| H01-226574 | Sep 1989 | JP |
| 04050647 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 06320647 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 7-502718 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| H07-502718 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 08119334 | May 1996 | JP |
| 09328170 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 10297676 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 3091247 | Sep 2000 | JP |
| 2005-178834 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2006-290356 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 3165722 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2015-017336 | Jan 2015 | JP |
| 2017-193376 | Oct 2017 | JP |
| 1984002936 | Aug 1984 | WO |
| 9318911 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| 9601731 | Jan 1996 | WO |
| 9624540 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| 0126889 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| 2010101232 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2015035335 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| 2019005739 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Search Report dated Apr. 24, 2020, issued in counterpart EP Application No. 20156524 (5 pages). |
| Extended Search Report (Supplementary) dated May 24, 2020, issued in counterpart EP Application No. 14843068.9 (9 pages). |
| International Search Report dated Dec. 25, 2014, issued in Application No. PCT/US2014/054615 (6 pages). |
| An Office Action mailed by China National Intellectual Property Administration dated Mar. 17, 2022, which corresponds to Chinese Patent Application No. 201880054670.8 and is related to U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,813; with English language translation (no newly cited references). |
| An Office Action mailed by the Korean Intellectual Property Office dated Mar. 30, 2022, which corresponds to Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7039059 and is related to U.S. Appl. No. 16/872,813; with English language translation (no newly cited references). |
| An Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2021, issued in counterpart EP application No. 18 822 784.7. (5 pages). |
| An Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2021, issued in counterpart JP Application No. 2020-520433, with English Translation. (17 pages). |
| An Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2021, issued in counterpart IN Application No. 202017001425, with English Translation. (7 pages). |
| An Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2021, issued in couterpart JP Application No. 2020-520433, with English translation. (22 pages). |
| N English Translation of Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2021, issued in counterpart CN Application No. 201880054670.8. (11 pages). |
| An Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2021, issued in counterpart CA Application No. 3,067,852. (4 pages). |
| Diaz, “Clupak Paper—A New Type of High-Stretch Paper—Its Manufacture and Performance,” 1959, ASTM International in Symposium on Paper and Paper Products—New Developments with Accompanying Requirements for New Testing Methods (Year : 1959). |
| International Search Report dated Nov. 20, 2018, issued in Application No. PCT/US18/39416 (counterpart to US Application No. PCT/US2018/039416: Attorney Docket: P191074PC00). (5 pages). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinioin in Related PCT Application No. PCT/2018/39416, dated Nov. 20, 2018. |
| Van Eperen, Roger, The effect of testing procedures on tensile strength and tear resistance of shipping bag kraft t>aper, Sep. 2004 (date available) (Year 2004). |
| Dumbleton, David P., Longitudinal compression of individual pulp fibers, Mar. 2005 (date available) (Year: 2005). |
| Vishtal el al., Boosting the Extensibility Potential of Fibre Networks: A Review, 2014, BioResources, vol. 9, No. 4 (Year 2014). |
| R..S. Seth Pulp & Paper Canada T31, 106:2 (2005) III, pp. 33-40 (T31-T38). |
| International Search Report dated Oct. 25, 1995, issued in counterpart GB Application No. PCT/GB95!01578 (2 paages). |
| International Search Report dated Jul. 2, 1993, issued in counterpart Application No. PCT/US93/02369 (3 pages). |
| International Search Report dated Jun. 6, 1996, issued in counterpart Application No. PCT/US96/01743 (4 pages). |
| Extended Search Report dated Feb. 25, 2021, issued in counterpart EP Application No. 19764975.9 (7 pages). |
| An Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2020, issued in counterpart AU Application No. 2018290739 (4 pages). |
| Interntional Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2020, issued in counterpart Application No. PCT/US2020/042093. (33 pages). |
| Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Forms PCT/IB/326) ssued in counterpart International Application No. PCT/US2020/042093 dated Jan. 27, 2022, with Forms PCT/B/373 and PCT/ISN237. (21 pages). |
| Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 202080064508.1 dated Aug. 25, 2023. (See also attached machine translation). |
| European Search Report issued in European Application No. 20840459.0 dated Aug. 4, 2023. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220106093 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62595473 | Dec 2017 | US | |
| 62874163 | Jul 2019 | US | |
| 62524905 | Jun 2017 | US | |
| 61874873 | Sep 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14480319 | Sep 2014 | US |
| Child | 16274028 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16018702 | Jun 2018 | US |
| Child | 16872813 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16212536 | Dec 2018 | US |
| Child | 17347561 | US | |
| Parent | 16929843 | Jul 2020 | US |
| Child | 16212536 | US | |
| Parent | 16872813 | May 2020 | US |
| Child | 16929843 | US | |
| Parent | 16274028 | Feb 2019 | US |
| Child | 16929843 | Jul 2020 | US |
