Expanding die and method of shaping containers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7934410
  • Patent Number
    7,934,410
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 26, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 3, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
The present invention provides an expansion die for manufacturing containers including a work surface including a progressively expanding portion and a land portion; and an undercut portion positioned following the land portion of the work surface. The present invention further provides a process for manufacturing shaped containers including providing a container stock having a first diameter; expanding at least a portion of the container stock to a second diameter with at least one expansion die; and forming an end of the container stock to accept a container lid.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to expansion dies for shaping beverage containers.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Beverage containers for various soft drinks or beer are generally formed by drawn and iron technology (i.e., the DI can), in which the container trunk (or side wall portion) and the container bottom are integrally formed by drawing and ironing a metallic sheet, such as an aluminum alloy sheet or a surface-treated steel sheet.


In the industry, these beverage containers are produced massively and relatively economically to substantially an identical shape. As the containers are produced substantially to an identical shape, they can not adequately be discriminated or differentiated from one another by their appearance. As the beverage containers are manufactured massively and relatively economically, there is a strong desire among beverage manufacturers for economical beverage containers with unique configurations to help differentiate their products.


In an effort to satisfy the desires of the beverage manufacturers, many containers manufacturers have been trying to add improvements to their manufacturing technology and a number of processes for reshaping the container bodies have been proposed to date. One example of a prior reshaping process that produces a container body having an increased diameter includes molding technology in combination with an expansion medium that is positioned within the container body. The expansion medium causes a radial expansion of the container body from its interior against a mold surface having a geometry that corresponds to the desired shape. The expansion medium may include compressed air or nitrogen; an incompressible liquid; or may be provided by radially actuated fingers.


Reshaping or expansion of container bodies by molding technology has a number of disadvantages. More specifically, molding of container bodies increases manufacturing time and hence the cost associated with producing the beverage containers. Molding is not easily incorporated into an inline process, therefore requiring that the molding step be separate from the in line process of forming container bodies using drawn and iron technology.


A further disadvantage is that the degree of expansion that may be provided using molding is substantially limited, especially when taking into account that drawn and ironed cans have undergone intensive metal working, i.e., drawing and ironing operations, and may no longer retain adequate ductility so that a conspicuous contour to give the desired effects is attainable without resulting in rupture of the can or metal fracture. In one example, an aluminum body container having a wall thickness on the order of approximately 0.0040″, can only be radially expanded by a maximum of 10% of the container body's original diameter using a single molding step.


In light of the above, a need exists to provide a more economic method of providing beverage containers having an expanded diameter portion, wherein the method is easily incorporated into an in-line process.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Generally speaking, in accordance with the invention, a process for manufacturing a shaped container with a sidewall having at least one expanded diameter portion is provided, in which the expanded portion is provided by at least one expansion die.


The method including:


providing a container stock having a first diameter;


expanding at least a portion of the container stock to a second diameter with at least one expansion die; and


forming an end of the container stock to accept a container lid.


The expansion die is insertable into the open end of a container stock, wherein the work surface of the expansion die progressively diverges from the expansion die's centerline. As the expansion die is inserted into the open end of the container stock, the work surface of the expansion die deforms the container stock's sidewalls radially to provide an expanded diameter portion.


In one embodiment, the method may further include necking the container stock with at least one necking die to a third diameter following the expansion step and prior to the step of forming of the end of the container stock to accept the container lid.


In one embodiment, the method may further include the step of adjusting the travel dimension of the container stock into the necking die and/or the expansion die to provide a minimized transition between an expanded portion of the container and a necked portion of the container or an elongated transition of substantially uniform diameter between the expanded portion and the necked portion of the container.


In another aspect of the present invention, an expansion die is provided for manufacturing metal containers with a radially expanded diameter. The expansion die includes a work surface having a progressively expanding portion and a land portion; and an undercut portion positioned following the land portion of the work surface. The initial portion of the work surface has a geometry for forming the transition in a container body sidewall from the original diameter portion to an expanded diameter portion.


In another aspect of the present invention, a die system is provided including the above described expansion die for providing a shaped container having at least one radially expanded diameter portion. The die system including:


a first expansion die having a work surface configured to increase a container stock diameter and to determine a profile at a transition from an original container stock diameter to an expanded portion of the container stock, and


at least one progressive expansion die, wherein each successive die of the at least one progressive expansion die has a working surface configured to provide an equal, less than, or increasing degree of expansion in the container stock diameter from the first expansion die.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following detailed description, given by way of example and not intended to limit the invention solely thereto, will best be appreciated in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and parts, in which:



FIG. 1A is a side cross sectional view of one embodiment of an expansion die, in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 1B is a side cross sectional view of another embodiment of an expansion die, in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 1C is a side cross sectional view of another embodiment of an expansion die, in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 1D is a magnified cross sectional view of the undercut depicted in FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C.



FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 2C are pictorial representations of some embodiments of a 2.069″ internal diameter beverage can (beverage container) having at least one portion with a diameter expanded to greater than the diameter of a 211 beverage can using the method in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a pictorial representations of some embodiments of a 211 beverage can (beverage container) having at least one portion with an internal diameter expanded from a 2.603″ diameter to an internal diameter greater than 2.860″ using the method in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a side cross sectional necking die used in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIGS. 1A-1D depict an expansion die 5 used to provide a shaped beverage container having at least one expanded portion, in which the diameter of the beverage container is expanded radially. Preferably, the shaped beverage container may be generally of a beverage can geometry or may generally have the geometry of beverage bottle, but other geometries have been contemplated and are within the scope of the present invention. Preferably, the beverage container is formed from a metal, more preferably being an aluminum alloy, such as Aluminum Association (AA) 3104.


The expansion die 5 of the present invention includes a work surface 10 including a progressively expanding portion 15 and a land portion 20; and an undercut portion 25 positioned following the land portion 20 of the work surface 10. The initial portion 30 of the work surface 10 has a geometry for forming a transition in a container sidewall from an original diameter portion to an expanded diameter portion.


In one embodiment, an expansion die 5 is provided as illustrated in FIG. 1A, in which the initial portion 30 of the work surface 10 has an angle configured to provide a smooth transition between the container's original diameter and the expanded portion of the container sidewall, in which the container's diameter is increased radially. Examples of beverage containers having a smooth transition are illustrated in Examples A, B, C, D, and E of FIG. 2A, and Example K of FIG. 2C, which illustrate some embodiments of a 2.069″ internal diameter beverage can (beverage container) having at least one portion with a diameter expanded to greater than the diameter of a 211 beverage can having an internal diameter equal to 2.603″. For the purposes of this disclosure the term smooth transition denotes a gradual increase in diameter. In one preferred embodiment, an expansion die 5 having a work surface 10 to produce a smooth transition is provided to produce a container having a geometry similar to a pilsner glass.


In another embodiment, an expansion die 5 is provided as illustrated in FIGS. 1B and 1C, in which the initial portion 30 of the work surface 10 has a curvature configured to provide a more pronounced or stepped transition between the container's original diameter and the expanded portion of the container, in which the container's diameter is increased radially. In one embodiment, the curvature of the initial portion 30 of the work surface 10 may be provided by a single radii R1. In another embodiment, the curvature of the initial portion 30 of the work surface 10 may be provided by two opposing radii R2, R3 in a manner that produces the desired expansion in providing a sidewall with a pronounced or stepped transition. Examples of beverage containers having a pronounced or stepped transition are illustrated in Examples G, H, I, and J of FIGS. 2B, and Examples L, M, and N of FIG. 2C, which illustrate some embodiments of a 2.069″ internal diameter beverage can (beverage container) having at least one portion with a diameter expanded to greater than the diameter of a 211 beverage having an internal diameter equal to 2.603″. For the purposes of this disclosure, the term “pronounced or stepped transition” denotes a more abrupt increase in diameter that may include a ripple effect to the container's sidewall.


The work surface 10 of the expansion die 5 further includes a progressively expanding portion 15 which may include the initial portion 30. The progressively expanding portion 15 has dimensions and a geometry that when inserted into the open end of a can stock works the can stock's sidewall to radially expand the can stock's diameter in a progressive manner as the stock travels along the work surface 10. The degree of expansion may be dependent on the desired final diameter of the container's expanded portion, on the number of expanding dies utilized to form the expanded portion, as well as the material and wall thickness of the container stock. In one embodiment, the work surface 10 may provide the appropriate expansion and forming operations without the need of a knockout or like structure.


The work surface 10 of the expansion die 5 further includes a land portion 20 at the conclusion of the progressively expanding portion 15. The land portion 20 has dimensions and a geometry for setting the final diameter of the expanded portion of the container being formed by that expanding die 5. In one embodiment, the land portion 20 may extend along the necking direction by a distance L1 being less than 0.5″, preferably being on the order of approximately 0.125″. It is noted that the dimensions for the land portion 20 are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not deemed to limit the invention, since other dimensions for the land portion 20 have also been contemplated and are within the scope of the disclosure.


The work surface 10 may be a polished surface or a non-polished surface. In one embodiment, a polished surface has a surface roughness average (Ra) finish ranging from 2μ in to 6μ in. In one embodiment, the work surface 10 may be a non-polished surface having a surface roughness average (Ra) ranging from more than or equal to 8μ in to less than or equal to 32μ in, so long as the non-polished surface 10 does not significantly degrade the product side coating disposed along the container stock's inner surface.


Following the land portion 20 is an undercut portion 25 configured to reduce the frictional contact between the container stock and the expansion die 5, as the container stock has been worked through the progressive expanding portion 15 and land 20 of the working surface 10. FIG. 1D depicts a magnified view of the end of one embodiment of an undercut portion 25, in accordance with the present invention. The reduced frictional contact minimizes the incidence of collapse and improves stripping of the container stock during the expansion process. In a preferred embodiment, the undercut portion 25 is a non-polished surface having a surface roughness average (Ra) ranging from more than or equal to 8μ in to less than or equal to 32μ in. The under cut portion 25 may extend into the expanding die wall by a dimension L2 of at least 0.005 inches. It is noted that the dimensions and surface roughness values for the undercut portion 25 are for illustrative purposes only and that the present invention is not deemed to be limited thereto.


In another aspect of the present invention, a die system for producing shaped beverage containers is provided including the expanding die 5 described in this disclosure. The die system includes at least a first expansion die 5 having a work surface 10 configured to increase a container stock's diameter and to determine the profile at the transition from an original container stock diameter to an expanded portion of the container stock, and at least one progressive expansion die, wherein each successive die in the series of progressive expansion dies has a working surface configured to provide an equal, less than or increasing degree of expansion in the container stock's diameter from the first expansion die. In one embodiment, the die system may also include one or more necking dies. One example of a necking die is depicted in FIG. 4.


In another aspect of the present invention, a method of forming a beverage container is provided. The inventive method may utilize the above described expansion die 5 and includes providing a container stock having a first diameter; expanding at least a portion of the container stock to a second diameter greater than the first diameter with at least one expansion die; and forming an end of the container stock to accept a container lid.


The term “providing a container stock”, as used throughout the present disclosure, is meant to denote providing an aluminum blank, such as a disc or a slug, and shaping the blank into an aluminum container stock. At least one expansion die 5, as described above, is then inserted into the open end of the container stock. The number of expansion die 5 may be dependent on the degree of expansion, the material of the container stock and the sidewall thickness of the container stock. In one embodiment, five expansion die's 5 may be utilized to increase the internal diameter of a container stock from about 2.069″ to a diameter greater than the internal diameter of a 211 can, as depicted in FIGS. 2A-2C. In another embodiment, three expansion die may be utilized to expand the internal diameter of a 211 can from about 2.603″ to about 2.860″, as depicted in FIG. 3. Progressive expansion with the expansion die 5 of the present invention may provide increases in the container's diameter on the order of 25%, wherein greater expansions have been contemplated, so long as the metal is not fractured during expansion.


In one embodiment, the method of forming a beverage container may further include necking the container stock to a third diameter after the expanding of the portion of the container to the second diameter and prior to the forming of the end of the container blank to accept the container lid. Examples L and M depicted in FIG. 2C illustrate necking of an expanded portion of a container stock. Preferably, the third diameter provided by the necking step is less than the second diameter, and the third diameter may be greater than, less than or equal to the first diameter. In one embodiment, the necking process step may be provided by at least one necking die 40, as depicted in. FIG. 4. In one embodiment, the necking process may neck the expanded portion of the container in forming a beverage can or beverage container having a bottle shape.


As opposed to prior necking methods, necking an expanded portion of a container that is formed in accordance with the present invention from the expanded portion to a diameter greater than the container stock's original diameter does not require a knockout because the container's sidewalls are in a state of tension following expansion. In some embodiments, of the present invention a knockout may be used when necking the expanded portion of the container stock to a third diameter. Necking from the expanded portion to less than or equal to the container stock's original diameter typically require a knockout. Preferably, a knockout structure is utilized in necking steps wherein the diameter following necking is less than the container stock's original diameter.


In some embodiments of the present invention, the method of forming a beverage container further includes adjusting a travel dimension of the container stock into the necking die 40 and/or the expansion die 5 to provide a minimized transition between successive expanded portions of the container or between expanded portions and necked portions of the container. The travel dimension is defined as the distance the container stock is displaced along the work surface 10 of the expanding die 5 or necking die 40. One example of the effect of adjusting the travel dimension to provide a minimized transition is depicted in Example L of FIG. 2C. In another embodiment, the travel dimension may be adjusted to provide an elongated transition of substantially uniform diameter between an expanded portion of the container and a necked portion of the container. Examples of a container formed having an elongated transition of substantially uniform diameter include Examples H, I, and J or FIG. 2B, and Example M and N in. FIG. 2C.


The method of the present invention may further include shaping with multiple expanding die 5 sets and necking die 40 sets, which may be used in succession to provide multiple alternating expanded portions and necked portions formed into the container sidewall.


Following the final expansion/necking step the open end of the container stock is formed to accept a container lid. The forming step for attaching a container lid to the open end of the container stock may be any known process or method, including forming a flange, curl, thread, lug, attach outsert and hem, or combinations thereof.


The present invention provides an expansion die 5 and method of forming an expanded portion in the sidewall of a beverage container, therefore advantageously reducing the manufacturing cost associated with shaping beverage containers in beverage container manufacturing.


It is noted that the above disclosure is suitable for beverage, aerosol, food or any other container capable of being expanded and/or necked. Additionally, the above disclosure is equally applicable to drawn and iron, drawn, and impact extrusion shaping/expanding methods.


Although the invention has been described generally above, the following example is provided to further illustrate the present invention and demonstrate some advantages that arise therefrom. It is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific example disclosed.


EXAMPLE 1
Expansion of 2.069″ Internal Diameter

A five die expansion system was utilized to expand the diameter of a portion of a container stock having a 0.0088 inch thick sidewall of Aluminum Association (AA) 3104 from an original internal diameter of 2.069″ to a final internal diameter on the order of 2.615″. The expansion represents an increase of approximately 24% in the container stock's diameter without the formation of Lueder's lines or metal tears. The first expansion die providing an expansion of approximately 9%; the second and third expansion die each providing an expansion of approximately 4.5%; and a fourth and fifth expansion die each providing an expansion of approximately 3.0%.


EXAMPLE 2
Expansion of 2.603″ Internal Diameter

A three die expansion system was utilized to expand the diameter of a portion of the container stock of a 211 can having a 0.0056 inch thick sidewall of Aluminum Association (AA) 3104 from an original internal diameter of 2.603″ to a final internal diameter on the order of 2.860″. In each of the three expansion die the degree of expansion increased by 3% per expansion step.


Having described the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention may be otherwise embodied within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An expansion die for manufacturing metal containers comprising: a work surface configured to expand a diameter of a metal container having a closed bottom, the work surface comprising a progressively expanding portion and a land portion; andan undercut portion;wherein the land portion is between the progressively expanding portion and the undercut portion and an outer diameter of the land portion is a maximum diameter of the die;wherein the undercut portion comprises: (a) an undercut surface; and(b) an outer diameter of the undercut surface, wherein the outer diameter of the undercut surface is : (i) at least approximately 0.01 inches smaller than the outer diameter of the land portion; and(ii) no less than a minimum diameter so as to reduce but not eliminate frictional contact between the undercut surface and the metal container; andwherein the work surface is dimensioned so that when inserted into the metal container the entire land portion and at least a portion of the undercut portion enter the metal container causing the diameter of the at least a portion of the container to expand.
  • 2. The die of claim 1, wherein an initial portion of the work surface has a geometry for forming a transition in a container from an original diameter portion to an expanded diameter portion.
  • 3. The die of claim 2 wherein the transition is stepped or gradual.
  • 4. The die of claim 1, wherein the land portion has dimensions to provide an expanded diameter of a container stock worked by the work surface.
  • 5. The die of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the work surface has a surface roughness average (Ra) of approximately 8 μin to 32 μin.
  • 6. The die of claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the undercut portion has surface roughness average (Ra) of approximately 8 μin to 32 μin.
  • 7. A die system comprising: one or more expansion dies, at least one of the one or more expansion dies comprises: a work surface configured to expand a diameter of a metal container having a closed bottom, the work surface comprising a progressively expanding portion and a land portion; and an undercut portion;wherein the land portion is between the progressively expanding portion and the undercut portion and an outer diameter of the land portion is a maximum diameter of the die;wherein the undercut portion comprises: (a) an undercut surface; and(b) an outer diameter of the undercut surface wherein the outer diameter of the undercut surface is: (i) at least approximately 0.01 inches smaller than the outer diameter of the land portion; and(ii) no less than a minimum diameter so as to reduce but not eliminate frictional contact between the undercut surface and the metal container; andwherein the work surface is dimensioned so that when inserted into the metal container the entire land portion and at least a portion of the undercut portion enter the metal container causing the diameter of the at least a portion of the container to expand.
  • 8. The die system of claim 7 further comprising at least one necking die.
  • 9. The die system of claim 7 wherein the outer diameter of the land portion is substantially constant along a length of the land.
  • 10. The die system of claim 7 wherein at least a portion of the work surface has a surface roughness average (Ra) of approximately 8 μin to 32 μin.
  • 11. The die of claim 7 wherein at least a portion of the undercut portion has surface roughness average (Ra) of approximately 8 μin to 32 μin.
US Referenced Citations (89)
Number Name Date Kind
3759205 Dolveck Sep 1973 A
3857917 Reade Dec 1974 A
3898828 Cassai et al. Aug 1975 A
3995572 Saunders Dec 1976 A
4163380 Masoner Aug 1979 A
4173883 Boik Nov 1979 A
4947667 Gunkel et al. Aug 1990 A
5040682 Palisin, Jr. et al. Aug 1991 A
5058408 Leftault, Jr. et al. Oct 1991 A
5160031 Palisin, Jr. et al. Nov 1992 A
5261558 Claydon Nov 1993 A
5351852 Trageser et al. Oct 1994 A
5355710 Diekhoff Oct 1994 A
5394727 Diekhoff et al. Mar 1995 A
5470405 Wyatt-Mair et al. Nov 1995 A
5487295 Diekhoff et al. Jan 1996 A
5522248 Diekhoff et al. Jun 1996 A
5572893 Goda et al. Nov 1996 A
5645190 Goldberg Jul 1997 A
5699932 Claydon et al. Dec 1997 A
5711178 Hogendoorn et al. Jan 1998 A
5713235 Diekhoff Feb 1998 A
5724848 Aschberger Mar 1998 A
5727414 Halasz et al. Mar 1998 A
5746080 Hartman et al. May 1998 A
5755130 Tung et al. May 1998 A
5776270 Biondich Jul 1998 A
5822843 Diekhoff et al. Oct 1998 A
5832766 Hartman et al. Nov 1998 A
5851685 McEldowney Dec 1998 A
5899104 Brilman et al. May 1999 A
5899105 Erhard May 1999 A
5899106 Heurteboust et al. May 1999 A
5902086 Enoki May 1999 A
5916317 Willoughby et al. Jun 1999 A
5938389 Shore et al. Aug 1999 A
5960659 Hartman et al. Oct 1999 A
5970767 Hartman et al. Oct 1999 A
6038910 McClung Mar 2000 A
6079244 Robinson et al. Jun 2000 A
6085563 Heiberger et al. Jul 2000 A
6112932 Holdren Sep 2000 A
D435454 Munn et al. Dec 2000 S
6250122 Robinson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6286357 D'Amore et al. Sep 2001 B1
6308545 Burgel et al. Oct 2001 B2
6338263 Obata et al. Jan 2002 B1
6343496 Hanna et al. Feb 2002 B1
D455961 Edson et al. Apr 2002 S
6374657 Kirk et al. Apr 2002 B1
6442991 Rojek Sep 2002 B1
D464264 Edson et al. Oct 2002 S
6701764 Bruck et al. Mar 2004 B2
D490317 Chang May 2004 S
6779677 Chupak Aug 2004 B2
6802196 Gong et al. Oct 2004 B2
6886722 Flecheux May 2005 B2
6907653 Chupak Jun 2005 B2
6945085 Goda Sep 2005 B1
D512315 Holm Dec 2005 S
D514937 Chang Feb 2006 S
7003999 Campo et al. Feb 2006 B2
7004000 Campo et al. Feb 2006 B2
7188499 Ogaki et al. Mar 2007 B2
7670094 Bolthauser Mar 2010 B2
7726165 Myers et al. Jun 2010 B2
20010022103 Zeiter et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010040167 Flecheux et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020162371 Hamstra et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030074946 Campo et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030102278 Chupak Jun 2003 A1
20030115923 Veen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040011112 Lentz et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040035871 Chupak Feb 2004 A1
20040040970 Weijers et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040187536 Gong et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040194522 Hamstra et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040216506 Simpson et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040231395 Barber Nov 2004 A1
20050000260 Campo et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050193796 Heiberger et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050235726 Chupak Oct 2005 A1
20060071035 Christ et al. Apr 2006 A1
20070266758 Myers et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271993 Druesne et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080022746 Myers et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080116212 Jonker May 2008 A1
20090274957 Goda et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100199741 Myers et al. Aug 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
060964 Oct 2010 AR
2007254362 Dec 2010 AU
2234-96 Dec 1996 CL
4113428 Oct 1992 DE
492861 Jul 1992 EP
599583 Jun 1994 EP
721384 Aug 1994 EP
767241 Apr 1997 EP
845315 Jun 1998 EP
852973 Jul 1998 EP
852974 Jul 1998 EP
854823 Jul 1998 EP
1064413 Jan 2001 EP
0853513 Aug 2001 EP
928229 Aug 2001 EP
0853514 Oct 2001 EP
0853515 Oct 2001 EP
1294622 Mar 2003 EP
1506824 Feb 2005 EP
1461262 Feb 2007 EP
1586393 Sep 2007 EP
2111935 Oct 2009 EP
2495507 Jun 1982 FR
2762383 Oct 1998 FR
P0026760 Oct 2010 ID
07242226 Sep 1995 JP
2000015371 Jan 2000 JP
9111274 Aug 1991 WO
9111275 Aug 1991 WO
9114626 Oct 1991 WO
9322079 Nov 1993 WO
9505253 Feb 1995 WO
9515227 Jun 1995 WO
9615865 May 1996 WO
9625256 Aug 1996 WO
9640457 Dec 1996 WO
9711889 Apr 1997 WO
9712704 Apr 1997 WO
9712705 Apr 1997 WO
9712706 Apr 1997 WO
9747408 Dec 1997 WO
9805445 Feb 1998 WO
9839117 Sep 1998 WO
9843757 Oct 1998 WO
9932242 Jul 1999 WO
9937826 Jul 1999 WO
0151231 Jul 2001 WO
0158618 Aug 2001 WO
0196209 Dec 2001 WO
03039975 May 2003 WO
03047991 Jun 2003 WO
2004058597 Jul 2004 WO
2005000498 Jan 2005 WO
2005099926 Oct 2005 WO
2006040116 Apr 2006 WO
2006078690 Jul 2006 WO
2008110679 Sep 2008 WO
2009130034 Oct 2009 WO
200810096 Dec 2009 ZA
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070295051 A1 Dec 2007 US