My invention relates generally to the field of reciprocating internal combustion engines. More specifically, it deals with an expansible chamber piston engine including an undulating flywheel.
Reciprocating internal combustion engines include piston engines, rotary engines, and other well-known engine types. The specific field of this invention is, however, most directly to reciprocating piston engines.
In current engine designs of this type, a piston is used to drive a rotating crankshaft through a connection rod. The stroke of the rotating assembly is determined by the diameter of rotation of the crankshaft. This design leads to numerous limitations and deficiencies. First, at a given engine speed, the speed of the crankshaft ends remain constant. Thus, the duration of intake strokes, exhaust strokes, compression strokes and power strokes must remain the same. Second, power is produced by filling the engine cylinder with an air fuel mixture and inducing combustion of the mixture to generate heat and expansion to propel the pistons and, thereby, the crankshaft. Filling the cylinder with an air fuel mixture takes time. Power produced has, therefore, a direct correlation to the volumetric efficiency of the intake cycle. However, the time for the intake cycle is fixed by the rotational speed of the crankshaft and volumetric efficiency is often compromised. Third, completing the combustion process also takes time. In conventional engine designs, in order to compensate for the time it takes for complete combustion, the ignition timing is advanced ahead of the piston moving to top dead center (TDC) during a compression stroke. The higher the speed of rotation, the more advance in timing is required. This, in turn, wastes energy since additional energy must be expended in using the piston (during the compression stroke) to compress the expanding gases produced during the onset of the combustion process. This is completely wasted energy that could have been used to propel the crankshaft. Fourth, a method commonly used to compensate for the need for additional ignition time is to lengthen the connecting rod, thereby allowing the piston to “park” at top dead center for longer. However, there is a limitation to the length of the connecting rod used since longer rods will expand the physical size of the engine. Fifth, the power output of the convention engine design is directly proportional to the work generated by the expansion of the combusted fuel and air mixture. Since the time for the power stroke to transfer power to the crankshaft is dictated by the rotational speed, unused heat and expansible energy are channeled out when the exhaust valve opens near the end of the power stroke as the piston approaches bottom dead center.
Based on the foregoing, it is clear that there is a great need for additional flexibility in designing the pattern, speed and timing for various strokes in piston based internal combustion engines. However, there has been almost nothing done that is relevant to this goal. Moreover, there is no prior art where a piston interacts directly with an undulating flywheel surface. Only one patent known to the inventor might be argued to bear some relationship to an engine of this type: U.S. Pat. No. 3,745,887 issued to Striegl in 1973. Streigl has pistons that interact with a hollow cylindrical “rotor” having a cam edge. Each piston of the Striegl device is nested in its own individual hollow rotor with each rotor connected by an output/drive shaft to a flywheel. All of these elements are in axial alignment. However, there is nothing in Streigl or any other prior art known to the inventor that has off-axis pistons interacting with the undulating surface of a flywheel. Nor, does Streigl provide the additional design flexibility necessary for the truly efficient functioning of piston based internal combustion engines.
My invention is a new form of expansible chamber engine intended primarily for use as an internal combustion engine. Its characteristic features are, however, also applicable to use with steam.
The engine of my invention includes a rotatable flywheel with an undulating cam surface, and an expansible chamber device including a piston abutting the cam surface and movable in a cycle between retracted and extended positions. The cycle includes a power stroke of the piston from its retracted to its extended position to urge the piston against the cam surface and thereby rotate the flywheel, and a compression stroke from the extended position to the retracted position in response to the cam surface. This arrangement offers numerous advantages, including several advantages inherent in the use of an undulating cam surface and, likewise, several advantages inherent in its use of an expansible chamber device interacting with this surface.
Many of the primary advantages of the undulating cam surface of my invention derive from the fact that it can be shaped and formed so as to provide engine cycle features desired by the designer. Thus, it provides the designer with extraordinary flexibility in adjusting the duration of the intake/exhaust cycle, the duration of the combustion/power cycle, the compression stroke pattern (so as to maximize cylinder fill volumetric efficiency), and the power stroke pattern (so as to maximize transfer of power from the piston the fly wheel). In comparison, the conventional crankshaft, piston, and connecting rod rotational assembly provide almost no design flexibility. In the conventional assembly, the radius of the crankshaft and piston fixes rotational duration. And, TDC (top dead center) and BDC (bottom dead center) duration can be only minimally altered through the use of difference lengths of connecting rod at a given crankshaft rotational radius.
The use of an expansible chamber also provides numerous advantages. To begin with, it serves to reduce the weight of my engine's reciprocating assemblies by eliminating connecting rods, eliminating crankshaft and counterweights, and reducing the number of cylinders for the same number of power stroke per flywheel revolution. In addition, since the top of the two pistons in each expansible chamber form the combustion chamber at their top dead center, it offers flexibility in designing the shape of the combustion chamber to allow the most efficient flame front propagation. This in turn promotes complete and efficient combustion to yield maximum combustion pressure. It also allows dynamic compression pressure to be varied by adjusting intake pressure and/or cam profile. Further, it allows flexibility in the positioning of the intake port and exhaust ports (thereby promoting more effective discharge of exhaust gas, influx of incoming air and tumbling and turbulence inside the cylinder). The large surface areas it makes available also provide flexibility in the positioning of sparkplug and/or fuel injector in relation to the combustion chamber (for the best flame travel and efficient and completion combustion of fuel). In comparison, operation of a conventional (and complex) crankshaft, piston, connecting rod rotational assembly requires constant acceleration and deceleration of its of pistons and connecting rods. Thus, much of the energy produced from the power stroke of one cylinder is consumed in propelling and decelerating the dead weight of other reciprocating units. Also, the small amount of area available in the cylinder head and combustion chamber of conventional assemblies limits the positioning of intake valve, exhaust valve, spark plug and/or fuel injector.
Referring to the drawing, the preferred embodiments of my engine include left and right flywheels 2, 5 on an output shaft 4, and an expansible chamber device 13 between the flywheels, radially offset relative to the shaft 4. The expansible chamber device 13 includes a cylinder 8 with left and right pistons 9 movable in the cylinder between retracted positions (
Notwithstanding the foregoing description of a preferred embodiment, it should be realized that my invention could also be structured with a single piston in an expansible chamber interacting with a single flywheel and undulating cam surface. This configuration is, in effect, illustrated by taking either side of
The overall operation of my invention can best be understood by considering the configuration illustrated in use as a two-stoke engine. In this application,
As previously noted, there are several advantages to be realized from the engine of this invention:
First, the engine has no crankshaft or connecting rods, so the dynamic loads and stresses associated with such rapidly accelerating, decelerating, rotating, and reciprocating members are eliminated. Fewer rotating and reciprocating parts also reduces friction losses. The engine is also lighter in weight because of fewer components, and because reduced internal antagonistic forces allow for lighter construction.
Second, the cam surface configuration can be designed to vary or control numerous parameters. Thus, by way of example,
The foregoing by no means exhausts the possibilities in this area. The undulating cam surface 6 of flywheels 2, 5 need not be strictly symmetrical and sinusoidal as illustrated in
Thus, numerous variations to the undulating surfaces 6 of my invention are possible that can alter compression ratios, duration of intake/exhaust stroke, duration of combustion/power stroke, compression stroke pattern. (to maximize cylinder fill volumetric efficiency), and power stroke pattern to maximize transfer of power from piston to flywheel. Overall, the amplitude of a stroke is based on crest to trough amplitude, while the length of time allowed for any event in the engine cycle is related to the slope of the portion of the undulating surface corresponding to the event. A steeper slope dictates a shorter time, while a flatter or flat slope extends the time. The aforesaid ability to freely vary, shape and determine various engine performance parameters stands in stark contrast to conventional crankshaft-piston-connecting rod assemblies. In these assemblies rotational duration is fixed by the radius of the crankshaft, and piston TDC and BDC duration can be only minimally altered by use of connecting rods of different lengths.
Third, the expansible chamber itself can also be designed and configured to enhance certain characteristics. As previously noted, my expansible chamber engine reduces the weight of the reciprocating assemblies by eliminating connecting rods, crankshaft, and counterweights, and with fewer cylinders for a given number of power strokes per flywheel revolution. However, this is only part of the advantages it offers. As the tops of the two pistons form the combustion chamber at their top dead center, my design provides enormous flexibility in designing the shape of the combustion chamber for complete and efficient combustion, flame propagation, and maximum combustion pressure. For example, in conventional engines external components affect the shape the combustion chamber can take and the small space in the cylinder head and combustion chamber limits the positioning of intake and exhaust valves, spark plug, and/or fuel injector. In my engine, the top and bottom of the combustion chamber is formed by the tops of pistons 9. The sides of the combustion chamber are formed by the arcing walls of cylinder 8. Thus, in contrast to the asymmetrical wedge shape typical of most conventional combustion chambers, my invention begins with a symmetrical chamber. The top and bottom of this chamber, formed by the tops of pistons 9, can easily be formed into the hollow hemispherical shape favored for flame front propagation. Likewise, the broad arcing walls of cylinder 8 provide ample room for the placement of one or several air inlet ports 10, fuel inlet ports 12, and/or sparkplugs as necessary or advisable to maximize combustion (and thereby maximize power while minimizing pollution).
Intake and exhaust ports can also be located to enhance the discharge of exhaust gas, influx of incoming air, and tumbling and turbulence within the cylinder. For example, in
Fourth, the drawing shows only one cylinder, as an example. Plural cylinders and, therefore, plural power strokes can be added without addition of size. The number of power strokes per revolution is a function of the number of cylinders included, and also of the number of peaks and troughs on the cam surface.
Fifth, The radially offset position of the cylinder relative to the output shaft can be altered to thereby alter the speed of revolution, torque, and horsepower output characteristic of the engine 1 even where other cam surface features remain constant. For example, a flatter torque curve can be achieved by moving the cylinder radially toward or away from the output shaft in relation to the rpm, thereby producing wider power range and requiring fewer gears in transmission.
Sixth, deviation of angle of the cylinder axis in relation to the output shaft allows the outward push of the piston, during the power stroke, to exert more force on the cam surface and flywheel. This, in turn, allows my engine to produce more power at a given amount of combustion pressure in comparison to conventional engine design. Further, this change will reduce frictional forces between the sides of the cylinder 8 and the sides or skirt of piston 9, thereby reducing friction and wear and tear on these parts. An angle in the range of 20° to 30° is considered optimal.
Seventh, power transmission from a power stroke exerting force on opposing flywheels 2, 5 rotating in opposite directions eliminates or reduces vibration, for a smooth running of the engine 1. The engine 1 can idle at lower rpm because less energy is required to rotate the flywheel and the reciprocating assemblies and less internal friction to overcome.
Eighth, my engine 1 is more fuel-efficient and produces less waste heat for a given amount of power output in comparison to conventional engines. This is because less energy is required to rotate the flywheels 2, 5 and the reciprocating piston assemblies of an expansible chamber 13, and because more of the combustion pressure is applied to rotating the flywheels 2, 5 for power output. The simple drive train of my invention eliminates parasitic power losses from friction, opposing inertia from large reciprocating masses, camshaft, and valve train, thereby yielding more usable output power.
Finally, my engine 1 is compact because of the radial arrangement of plural cylinders around the output shaft and can be easily adapted for both two-stroke and four-stroke applications. Two-stroke applications have been previously discussed. Four-stroke applications require only minimal adaptations. Thus, as previously noted and illustrated in
In summary, my engine presents a unique and valuable addition to the field of internal combustion engines and offers unique flexibility and advantages in engine design as well as engine cycle design. The foregoing description of a preferred embodiment of my invention sets forth the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out my invention. However, any details as to materials, quantities, dimensions, and the like are intended as illustrative. The concept and scope of my invention are limited not by the description but only by the following claims and equivalents thereof. Moreover, any terms indicative of orientation are used with reference to drawing illustrations. Such terms are not intended as limitations but as descriptive words. Apparatus described herein retains its described character whether it is oriented as shown or otherwise.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of allowed parent application Ser. No. 09/928,742, filed Aug. 13, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,619,244, entitled Expansible Chamber Engine.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3570459 | Combs | Mar 1971 | A |
3745887 | Streigl | Jul 1973 | A |
4334506 | Albert | Jun 1982 | A |
5894763 | Peters | Apr 1999 | A |
6039011 | Agalarov et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6619244 | Ho | Sep 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040016412 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09928742 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10622232 | US |