This application is a U.S. national stage application of International Application No. PCT/FR2014/053549, which was filed on Dec. 23, 2014, and entitled “Expansible Intravertebral Implant System with Posterior Pedicle Fixation,” which in turn claims priority to French Patent Application No. 1363467, filed Dec. 23, 2013, of the same title. The entire content of the aforementioned applications are herein expressly incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to an expandable intravertebral implant system with posterior pedicle fixation. More particularly, the present invention relates to an expandable intravertebral implant system offering enhanced vertebral anchoring by adding a pedicle dowel firmly anchored in a vertebral pedicle.
Several vertebroplasty techniques are known for performing vertebral correction enabling a vertebra deformed following bone compression, for example due to osteoporosis or an injury, to return to the initial shape or morphology thereof.
For example, the kyphoplasty technique is known, consisting of introducing an inflatable balloon into a vertebra, then sending a pressurised fluid into the balloon placed in the vertebra in order to force the cortical envelope of the vertebra, and particularly the lower and upper vertebral plates to return to a corrected shape under the effect of the pressure. Once the cortical bone envelope has been corrected, the balloon is then deflated, and removed from the vertebra, in order to be able to inject therein a bone cement intended to give the corrected vertebra a stable mechanical strength over time.
Through the international patent application WO2005/120400 in particular, an expandable implant is known, comprising a first and a second opposite plates, suitable for respectively forming a first and a second bearing surfaces in a vertebral body; these two bearing surfaces being called upon to separate from one another along a predefined expansion plane. The expandable implant is positioned in the vertebral body, and the plates are deployed along an expansion plane which corresponds to the bone correction plane sought. A bone cement is then injected in order to stabilise the bone correction.
The bone cement may be injected with a relatively low pressure by means of the implant which remains in position in the vertebral body.
In the case of the most severe injuries, the use of the methods cited above may prove to be insufficient. The repair of vertebral fractures, and particularly vertebral fractures induced by compression is then preferentially performed by means of screws inserted into the pedicles of the over- and underlying vertebrae of the compressed vertebra, these screws being associated with posterior rods, thus mechanically connecting the two over- and underlying vertebrae to enable vertebral consolidation. Pedicle screws are well-known in the prior art. Screws such as those described in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,209,753 are particularly known.
The drawback of this technique lies in the fusion of two vertebral joint levels caused by the fixation of the posterior rods connecting the over- and underlying vertebrae. Furthermore, these methods do not always enable bone correction of the compressed vertebra but merely the stabilisation of three adjacent vertebrae and thus the locking of two joint levels. The surgical act associated with this procedure is furthermore very invasive and requires access to at least two vertebrae.
In order to remedy these drawbacks, it appears to be necessary to provide a device enabling the repair of vertebral fractures, and particularly severe vertebral fractures caused by compression, preventing fusion and enabling consolidation, at the pedicle, of an expandable intravertebral implant situated in the vertebral body.
As such, the aim of the invention is to associate with an expandable intravertebral implant, positioned in a vertebral body, a pedicle fixation (for example dowel or sleeve), intended to be anchored in the pedicle. This pedicle fixation ensures high-quality support and anchoring of the bone. Indeed, while the vertebral body consists of spongy bone, having a high porosity of 30 to 90%, the pedicle consists of cortical bone, having a porosity of 5 to 30%, thus offering strong mechanical support for the intravertebral implant and making it possible to reconstruct vertebral fractures, and particularly vertebral fractures caused by compression, even the most severe.
Extendable bone implant systems comprising an additional anchoring in the pedicle bone are known, such as for example the systems described in the patent applications EP 2 074 956 and US 2009/005821. However, these systems describe an expandable member rigidly connected to said pedicle fixation, for example by screwing both parts. For this reason, the direction of expansion of the expandable member and the positioning of the member in the vertebral body are directly dependent on the position of the pedicle fixation.
The invention has the advantage of enabling the deployment of the expandable intravertebral implant independently, along at least one degree of freedom, of the position of the pedicle fixation. The implant system also makes it possible to secure (i.e. lock all the degrees of freedom) said extendable intravertebral implant with respect to the pedicle fixation, when the implant system is positioned in extension in the vertebra.
Advantageously, a posterior element acting as a connection system is associated with the pedicle fixation element, making it possible to adjoin to the expandable intravertebral implant means completing the bone correction, for example using posterior rods or other system intended to stabilise the fracture site further.
As such, the present invention ensures vertebral correction using a modular expandable intravertebral implant system with posterior pedicle fixation.
The invention thus relates to an expandable intravertebral implant system comprising an intravertebral implant comprising an expandable anterior part in a vertebral body and a posterior part; and a pedicle fixation having at least one hollow portion for receiving the posterior part of the intravertebral implant.
According to one embodiment, the pedicle fixation comprises an external thread ensuring the anchoring of said pedicle fixation in a vertebral pedicle.
According to one embodiment, the pedicle fixation comprises a hollow posterior inner portion and a hollow anterior inner portion wherein the posterior part of the intravertebral implant can move along at least one degree of freedom.
According to one embodiment, the pedicle fixation comprises a main axis and the posterior part of the intravertebral implant can move in translation and in rotation, along the main axis of the pedicle fixation, in the anterior inner portion of the pedicle fixation; in such a way that the direction of expansion of the anterior part of the anterior part of the intravertebral implant is independent from the position of the pedicle fixation in the vertebral pedicle.
According to one embodiment, the anterior part of the intravertebral implant comprises a first and a second plates, suitable for respectively forming a first and a second bearing surfaces in a vertebral body; these two surfaces being suitable for being separated from one another along a predefined expansion plane.
According to one embodiment, the anterior inner portion comprises at least one groove on the inner surface thereof.
According to one embodiment, a posterior portion of the posterior part of the intravertebral implant comprises a cylindrical recess and at least one securing means suitable for locking in rotation and in translation the relative movements between the intravertebral implant and the pedicle fixation.
According to one embodiment, the securing means comprises at least one through hole, passing through the posterior portion and a peripheral chamber to the surface of the posterior portion in fluid communication with the at least one through hole.
According to one embodiment, the securing means comprises at least two slots extending axially along the posterior portion, an internal thread and a flared posterior end; suitable for engaging with a conical expansion cap.
According to one embodiment, the posterior element is secured to the pedicle fixation by means of a threaded rod screwed into an internal thread of the posterior inner portion.
According to one embodiment, the posterior element comprises a posterior portion suitable for assembly with additional posterior fixation elements such as rods or artificial ligaments.
Further specific features and advantages will emerge clearly from the description hereinafter, by way of indication and in no way limiting, with reference to the appended drawings, wherein:
The drawings in the figures are not to scale. Obviously, the scope of the invention is not restricted to examples of embodiments more specifically described and represented with reference to the appended figures; on the contrary, it includes any alternative embodiments.
The present invention relates to an expandable intravertebral implant system with posterior pedicle fixation.
According to a first embodiment, the implant system comprises an intravertebral implant associated with a pedicle fixation ensuring additional anchoring at the vertebral pedicle.
According to a second embodiment, as represent in
Intravertebral Implant
As represented in
According to one embodiment, the anterior part 11 corresponds to a deformable and expandable intravertebral implant 1 such as the SpineJack® implant marketed by the company VEXIM, known to those skilled in the art and also described in the patent application EP 1 778 136, incorporated herein by reference. It is specified that those skilled in the art, on reading said patent application, would readily find the features required for the embodiment of the present invention. In particular, the anterior part 11 of the intravertebral implant 1 of the present invention consists of an expandable part enabling bone correction and comprising:
According to one embodiment, as represented in
According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 is a hollow cylindrical body connected, at the anterior end thereof, to the posterior end of the anterior part 11 by a shoulder 121. Said posterior part 12 comprises a cylindrical recess 122 through which a central traction tube 13, initially situated in the anterior part 11, can slide. By pulling on the central traction tube 13, the central traction tube 13 slides in the cylindrical recess 122 of the posterior part 12 and the anterior and posterior ends of the anterior part 11 move closer, causing the expansion of the first and second plates of the anterior part 11 of the intravertebral implant 1. The central traction tube 13 is suitable for controlling the deployment of the expandable deformable anterior part 11. Once the traction tube 13 has been pulled inside the recess 122, the tube can no longer return to the initial position thereof, which holds the expansion of the anterior part 11, pending the injection of bone cement or substitute.
According to one embodiment illustrated in particular by
According to one embodiment illustrated by
According to one embodiment, the expansion of the intervertebral implant 1 is not due to the injection of a product into the posterior part of the implant 1. However, the injection of a filling material can make it possible to stabilise the implant once in the expansion position thereof. According to one embodiment, the intervertebral implant 1 does not comprise a pouch intended to be filled with a product (e.g. a filling material) so as to enable the expansion of the pouch. According to one embodiment, the injection of a filling material through the anterior part 11 alone, does not allow the expansion of the intravertebral implant 1.
According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 of the intravertebral implant 1 does not comprise an outer thread intended to be screwed with the pedicle fixation 2.
Pedicle Fixation
As represented in
According to one embodiment, the posterior inner portion 22 comprises an internal thread 221 or any other means within the scope of those skilled in the art for connecting the fixation 2 to a posterior element 3.
According to one embodiment, the anterior inner portion 23 comprises a bore defining a hollow portion for receiving the posterior part 12 of the intravertebral implant 1. According to one embodiment, the surface of the anterior inner portion 23 is smooth. According to one embodiment, the surface of the anterior inner portion 23 is not threaded. According to one embodiment, the intravertebral implant 1, and particularly the posterior part 12, does not pass through the entire hollow pedicle fixation 2. According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 of the intravertebral implant 1 is intended to be inserted inside the anterior inner portion 23. According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 acts as a guide for the pedicle fixation 2. The shoulder 121 thus acts as a guiding stop for the fixation 2. According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 of the intravertebral implant 1 can move along at least one degree of freedom, preferentially 2 degrees of freedom in the anterior inner portion 23 of the pedicle fixation 2. According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 of the intravertebral implant 1 is sliding in the anterior inner portion 23. According to one embodiment, the mechanical link between the posterior part 12 and the anterior inner portion 23 is a sliding pivot link. According to one embodiment, the pedicle fixation 2, particularly the pedicle dowel, defines a main axis. According to this embodiment, the posterior part 12 of the intravertebral implant 1 can move in rotation and in translation along said main axis in the anterior inner portion 23 of the pedicle fixation 2.
Advantageously, the anterior portion 23 enables the expansion of the intervertebral implant 1 independently of the anchoring of the pedicle fixation 2 in the vertebral pedicle. Indeed, the degree of freedom in translation along the main axis of the pedicle fixation 2 makes it possible not to constrain the positioning (i.e. the advance due to deployment) of the intervertebral implant 1 in the vertebral body. Furthermore, the degree of freedom in rotation about the main axis of the pedicle fixation 2 makes it possible not to constrain the direction of expansion of the intervertebral implant 1. As such, the intervertebral implant 1, when deployed, adapts the deployment position thereof according to the medium wherein it is deployed (i.e. the vertebral body).
According to one embodiment, the anterior inner portion 23 does not comprise an outer thread. According to one embodiment, the anterior inner portion 23 and the intervertebral implant 1 are not screwed.
According to one embodiment, the anterior inner portion 23 further comprises at least one groove 231, as represented in
According to one embodiment, the anterior inner portion 23 comprises at least one axial and/or transverse and/or oblique groove 231. According to one embodiment, the at least one groove 231 comprises a non-constant cross-section. According to one embodiment, the anterior inner portion 23 comprises at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 grooves 231. According to one embodiment, the grooves are regularly distributed on the inner surface of the anterior portion 12. According to one embodiment, the pedicle fixation 2 comprises at least one notch 24, or any other means within the scope of those skilled in the art, suitable for rotating the pedicle fixation 2, using an insertion instrument 5.
Posterior Element
As represented in
Operation
After the creation of an approach and the boring of the vertebral pedicle, the implant system comprising the pedicle fixation 2 and the vertebral implant 1 wherein the posterior part 12 is inserted in the anterior inner portion 23 of the pedicle fixation 2 is inserted, and then screwed, into the pedicle using an insertion instrument 5, as represented in
According to one embodiment, after insertion of the implant system, the pedicle fixation 2 is securely fixed in the pedicle and the intravertebral implant 1 is partially secured to the pedicle fixation 2 by the cylindrical posterior part 12 thereof. Indeed, the cylindrical posterior part 12 is inserted into the anterior inner portion 23 thus locking the rotation movements about the y and x axes and locking the translations along said x and y axes. For this reason, these locked degrees of freedom ensure partial securing between the cylindrical posterior part 12 inserted into the anterior inner portion 23. The term securing denotes the locking of all the degrees of freedom between the pedicle fixation 2 and the intravertebral implant 1. The term partial securing denotes the locking of at least one degree of freedom between these two parts. The pedicle fixation 2 then abuts on the shoulder 121. As such, the intravertebral implant 1 has an additional support point in the pedicle. According to one embodiment, the vertebral implant 1 is not secured to the pedicle fixation 2 by screwing. According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 of the intervertebral implant 1 assembled with the pedicle fixation 2 does not traverse either side of the pedicle fixation 2. According to one embodiment, the posterior part 12 of the vertebral implant 1 is mounted in the anterior inner portion 23 of the pedicle fixation 2.
As represented in
As represented in
According to one embodiment, the dimensions of the posterior part 12 of the implant 1 are such that, once the posterior part 12 has been inserted into the anterior inner portion 23, the implant 1 can no longer be extracted from the pedicle fixation when it is implanted. The longitudinal dimension of the anterior inner portion 23 is sufficiently long so that the posterior part 12 remains inserted and partially secured to said anterior inner portion 23 during deployment. According to one embodiment, the length of the anterior inner portion 23 is indeed between 1 and 20 mm or between 5 and 15 mm.
According to this embodiment, the intravertebral implant 1 is free in axial rotation and in anterior translation with respect to the pedicle fixation 2. The deployment of the intravertebral implant 1 thus takes place only on the basis of the intravertebral bone environment which determines for the extendable anterior part 11 of the intervertebral implant 1 the orientation and depth of deployment of said extendable part. According to one embodiment, the intravertebral implant, and particularly the posterior part 12 thereof, can be moved along one, two, three, four, five degrees of freedom, preferentially two degrees of freedom, more preferentially one degree of freedom in rotation and one degree of freedom in translation, in the anterior inner portion 23. According to one embodiment, the intravertebral implant 1, and particularly the posterior part 12 thereof, can move in rotation and in translation along the z axis in the anterior inner portion 23.
According to one embodiment, after the expansion of the intravertebral implant 1, the rotation and translation along z between the intravertebral implant and the pedicle fixation are locked, thus securing the expandable intravertebral implant 1 to the pedicle fixation 2.
According to one embodiment, the anterior part of the intravertebral implant 11 is stabilised in the expansion position by injecting a filling material into the vertebra 4, via the at least one through hole 131. The filling material is injected by means of an injector through the pedicle fixation 2, the cylindrical recess 122 of the posterior part of the implant 12 and the hollow traction tube 13, up to the anterior part 11 of the implant 1.
According to one embodiment, the posterior part of the intravertebral implant 12 is secured to the pedicle fixation 2 by locking the relative movements of the posterior portion 12 with respect to the pedicle fixation 2 using securing means.
According to one embodiment, as illustrated in
According to one embodiment, as illustrated in
According to one embodiment, once the intravertebral implant 1 has been deployed, secured to the pedicle fixation 2 and stabilised, if required by means of the injection of specially adapted bone cement or substitute, it is then possible to secure (i.e. connect) to the pedicle fixation 2—intravertebral implant 1 assembly the posterior element 3 by merely screwing and fastening same in the posterior inner portion 22 of the pedicle fixation 2. In this embodiment, the posterior element 3 is at least partially external to the vertebra 4 and is then capable of receiving posterior fixation elements such as rods or artificial ligament systems or any other means for stabilising the vertebral fracture known to those skilled in the art.
The present invention also relates to a method for treating vertebral fractures comprising:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 63467 | Dec 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/053549 | 12/23/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/097416 | 7/2/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4796612 | Reese | Jan 1989 | A |
4932975 | Main et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4961740 | Ray et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969888 | Scholten et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5059193 | Kuslich | Oct 1991 | A |
5108404 | Scholten et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5209753 | Biedermann et al. | May 1993 | A |
5649902 | Yoon | Jul 1997 | A |
5665122 | Kambin | Sep 1997 | A |
5693100 | Pisharodi | Dec 1997 | A |
5695515 | Orejola | Dec 1997 | A |
5704860 | Stief | Jan 1998 | A |
5713907 | Hogendijk et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720746 | Soubeiran | Feb 1998 | A |
5749916 | Richelsoph | May 1998 | A |
5800500 | Spelman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800550 | Sertich | Sep 1998 | A |
5908448 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5972015 | Scribner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980522 | Koros et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6039761 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066154 | Reiley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6102950 | Vaccaro | Aug 2000 | A |
6126689 | Brett | Oct 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6176882 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183517 | Suddaby | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190414 | Young et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193757 | Foley et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197033 | Haid, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214050 | Huene | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235043 | Reiley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248110 | Reiley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261289 | Levy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280456 | Scribner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6332895 | Suddaby | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6395031 | Foley et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6423083 | Reiley et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6454807 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488710 | Besselink | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6554833 | Levy et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6582431 | Ray | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6595998 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607544 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623505 | Scribner et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632235 | Weikel et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6663647 | Reiley et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664897 | Pape et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676665 | Foley et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6716216 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6719773 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726691 | Osorio et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730126 | Boehm, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740093 | Hochschuler et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749595 | Murphy | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6783530 | Levy | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6929647 | Cohen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953477 | Berry | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6979341 | Scribner et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981981 | Reiley et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7044954 | Reiley et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7070598 | Lim et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083650 | Moskowitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087055 | Lim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7153306 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7217293 | Branch, Jr. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226481 | Kuslich | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7234468 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241303 | Reiss et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261720 | Stevens et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264622 | Michelson | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7291150 | Graf | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7318839 | Malberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7507241 | Levy et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513900 | Carrison et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7591822 | Olson, Jr. et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7621950 | Globerman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7625377 | Veldhuizen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7727279 | Zipnick et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744637 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749255 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758644 | Trieu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763028 | Lim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763074 | Altarac et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7799080 | Doty | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7846206 | Oglaza et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7879104 | Dewey et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7901409 | Canaveral et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7905885 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8133232 | Levy et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8152813 | Osorio et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8236058 | Fabian et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8282520 | Kurematsu et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292890 | Wu | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8317802 | Manzi et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8323309 | Khairkhahan et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8328818 | Seifert et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8372115 | Kohm et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8409282 | Kim | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425559 | Tebbe et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8491591 | Furderer | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8628577 | Jimenez | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8636746 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8709086 | Glerum | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8784491 | Biedermann et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8864833 | Glerum et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8888853 | Glerum et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8932302 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8940048 | Butler et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945190 | Culbert et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961609 | Schaller | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8986386 | Oglaza et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8998923 | Chirico et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9034041 | Wolters et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9173747 | Hansell et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9295502 | Fuerderer | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9326806 | Lin et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9408707 | Oglaza et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9439770 | Biedermann et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9445856 | Seifert et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9526621 | Kuslich | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20010032020 | Besselink | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020058947 | Hochschuler et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065548 | Birdsall et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068974 | Kuslich et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120327 | Cox et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143401 | Michelson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151976 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020198532 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030065396 | Michelson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074064 | Gerbec et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030171812 | Grunberg et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220650 | Major et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236520 | Lim et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040073308 | Kuslich et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087947 | Lim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040087994 | Suddaby | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102774 | Trieu | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133280 | Trieu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143827 | de Jong | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167625 | Beyar et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040210231 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215343 | Hochschuler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236342 | Ferree et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050107800 | Frankel et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143827 | Globerman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182416 | Lim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222681 | Richley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228391 | Levy et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234493 | Carr et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261781 | Sennett et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273135 | Chanduszko et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278036 | Leonard et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004455 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060085070 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116689 | Albans et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129101 | McGuckin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149268 | Truckai et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149379 | Kuslich et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184192 | Markworth et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235423 | Cantu | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241644 | Osorio et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271049 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281595 | Narita et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016303 | Jackson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021836 | Doty | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032790 | Aschmann et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032791 | Greenhalgh | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055201 | Seto et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093899 | Dutoit et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070142915 | Altarac et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149978 | Shezifi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173826 | Canaveral et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173832 | Tebbe et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173939 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225705 | Osorio et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070260315 | Foley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080051894 | Malandain et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058823 | Reiley et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065087 | Osorio et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065089 | Osorio et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086133 | Kuslich et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114367 | Meyer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125784 | Rabiner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140079 | Osorio et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140207 | Olmos et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147193 | Matthis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167657 | Greenhalgh | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183204 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080269766 | Justis | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280712 | Ryouno et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005782 | Chirico et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005821 | Chirico et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090171390 | Sankaran | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090228012 | Gangji et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234398 | Chirico et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264927 | Ginsberg et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276048 | Chirico et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281628 | Oglaza et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292323 | Chirico et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299378 | Knopp | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306715 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326581 | Galley | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100069913 | Chirico et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070035 | Mayer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100185291 | Jimenez et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100324607 | Davis | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021298 | Kurematsu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032020 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046739 | Oglaza et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066186 | Boyer, II et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110130232 | Barrette et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120071977 | Oglaza et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120123481 | Lin | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150228 | Zappacosta et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140031940 | Banouskou | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140114368 | Lin et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135780 | Lee et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150250518 | Chirico et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160157898 | Fuerderer | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170000622 | Thommen et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
705930 | Jun 1999 | AU |
1162349 | Oct 1997 | CN |
1713863 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1830399 | Sep 2006 | CN |
101031259 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101530343 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102427769 | Apr 2012 | CN |
20017962 | Jan 2001 | DE |
20303642 | Apr 2003 | DE |
0567424 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0571555 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0796593 | Sep 1997 | EP |
1778136 | May 2007 | EP |
2074956 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2782632 | Mar 2000 | FR |
2796268 | Jan 2001 | FR |
2435292 | Aug 2007 | GB |
2436292 | Sep 2007 | GB |
S62054313 | Mar 1987 | JP |
2000070274 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2001173863 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002535066 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2006507090 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2008501462 | Jan 2008 | JP |
20070068338 | Jun 2007 | KR |
2070006 | Dec 1996 | RU |
9834568 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9902214 | Jan 1999 | WO |
1999021501 | May 1999 | WO |
9952447 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0044319 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0049978 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0078253 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0101895 | Jan 2001 | WO |
01060263 | Aug 2001 | WO |
200154598 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0166047 | Sep 2001 | WO |
200176492 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0230338 | Apr 2002 | WO |
03003951 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003003951 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2004000166 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004019756 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004026188 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004034924 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004047689 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004086934 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005048856 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005120400 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2005120400 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006042206 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006068682 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006116760 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007041665 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007073488 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007075788 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007076308 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007076374 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007076376 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007079237 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007084239 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2009005851 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009037509 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009100200 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009125243 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010100287 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010103344 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Search Report for Application 201480070702.5 dated Feb. 2, 2018. |
Russian Search Report for RU2011141272 dated Feb. 8, 2013. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2009/033192 dated Mar. 19, 2009. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 22, 2013 for EP Application No. 12191848.6, filed Jun. 8, 2005. |
French Preliminary Search Report corresponding to French Patent Application No. 0406211 dated Feb. 15, 2005. |
Kuslich et al., U.S. Appl. No. 60/219,853, filed Jul. 21, 2000, titled “Expandable porous mesh bag device for reduction, filling,fixation and supporting of bone”. |
French Preliminary Search Report for Application No. FR1363467 dated Sep. 24, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Dec. 14, 2006 for PCT/IB2005/002631, filed Jun. 8, 2005. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 12, 2010 for PCT/IB2008/002246, filed Apr. 8, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 8, 2013 for PCT/IB2011/001480, filed Apr. 7, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Sep. 13, 2011 for PCT/IB2009/005385, filed Mar. 12, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority corresponding to International PCT/IB2005/002631 dated Feb. 7, 2006. |
International Search Report corresponding to International PCT/IB2008/002246 dated Jan. 29, 2009. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 12, 2009 and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2009/005385, filed Mar. 12, 2009. |
International Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2011 for PCT/IB2011/001480, filed Apr. 7, 2011. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 25, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/FR2014/053549, filed Dec. 23, 2014, and English translations of the International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160317188 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |