The present invention relates to an expansion bolt, particularly for use in engaging drilled holes. The application incorporates by reference herein in its entirety the inventors' U.S. Pat. No. 6,109,578, wherein a description of the related art as it concerns rock climbing is provided. The borehole-engaging apparatus of the '578 Patent provides a number of advantages over the prior art, such as simple construction, reliable operation, greater standardization, which reduces the cost per unit and the amount of gear that a climber must purchase and carry, and robustness or insensitivity to rotational orientation about the apparatus' longitudinal axis. For many purposes, including rock climbing, it is particularly important that the expansion bolt be easily removable. The lack of this feature is exemplified by an embodiment of an anchoring device shown in FIG. 3 of Dohmieier, U.S. Pat. No. 3,478,641, which biases hole gripping dogs outwardly with a brindle which is not accessible for removing the device.
The novel expansion bolt of the present invention provides advantages similar to those of the '578 Patent, as well as outstanding ease of insertion and removal, and hole-engaging or holding strength.
In addition to the problems associated with anchoring to rocks for rock climbing, the construction industry and providers of emergency services such as fire, police and rescue service often have the need for anchoring structures or devices for temporary use. For example, temporary shelter may be needed, and tents may need to be erected quickly in urban environments, i.e., on concrete or asphalt surfaces. To anchor the tent, weights such as sand bags or drums of water are typically employed. However, the use of weights poses a difficulty in obtaining and moving the material for the weights, or in obtaining and moving the weights themselves. These aspects of the use of weights as anchors as well as other aspects of the weights, such as the ready availability of sand or dirt in the urban environment, make it more difficult to move and erect the tent quickly.
In the construction industry, it is often imperative to provide fall protection for the workers. Typically, contractors build-in specialized harnessing hardware at predetermined locations on or in the structures as they are built. The harnessing hardware is specially adapted to accept inserts that are difficult to use because they tend to fill up with concrete. As the locations for the built-in hardware are predetermined, it may be determined later that they have not been placed precisely where they are needed, yet they will often be used anyway, posing risk of extreme injury or death. Moreover, as permanent or semi-permanent installations, they may be used by subcontractors or others when this is not anticipated or desired, so that the contractor assumes a risk of liability for injuries or deaths that result from the imprudent use of the harnessing hardware by others.
Also in the construction industry, there is often a need to move large objects or materials, such as boulders. Irregularly shaped objects such as boulders present particular difficulties in grasping; often chains must be wrapped around a boulder or other irregularly shaped object to secure it. Prefabricated structural materials, such as concrete facades, are typically provided with hardware for attaching chains or cables; however, these also may be found insufficient during actual construction.
There is also a need for retrofitting bridges and other structures with tying cables to increase earthquake resistance, and tying one or more large objects together. Presently, the cables are secured to hardware which is bolted to the structure with a number of bolts, requiring that a number of corresponding holes be drilled in the structure.
Emergency workers must sometimes assemble structures used for maneuvering in urban environments quickly, to respond to man-made and natural disasters. For example, emergency workers may need to climb the face of buildings, or provide hoists for elevating people and equipment, or anchor ladders to man-made structures such as brick or concrete-faced buildings as well as natural features such as rocks.
Accordingly, there is a need for an expansion bolt that provides a simple, reliable and relatively inexpensive means for connecting a cable, rope or wire to a drilled hole in a hard material, that is easy to install in and remove from the hole, and that effectively anchors to the hole while applying a minimum stress to the hole, while providing a minimum sensitivity to the angular orientation of the expansion bolt in the hole. There is more particularly a need to provide all of these features for use in a hole drilled in concrete or another hard but relatively brittle or weak material.
A preferred expansion bolt according to the present invention provides a cable, an inner chock, at least two outer chocks, and a compression spring. The inner chock is connected to an end of the cable and has at least a first outer ramping surface and a second outer ramping surface. The at least two outer chocks have respective inner ramping surfaces complementarily corresponding to the first and second outer ramping surfaces respectively. The outer chocks are adapted for relative movement along a longitudinal axis of the cable with respect to the inner chock over a predetermined range wherein, in a first direction of movement, the respective inner and outer ramping surfaces slidingly cooperate to radially expand the expansion bolt and, in an opposite direction of the movement, the respective inner and outer ramping surfaces permit radial contraction of the expansion bolt. The compression spring biases the outer chocks with respect to the inner chock in the first direction.
An alternative preferred expansion bolt according to the present invention provides a cable, an inner chock, and at least one outer chock. The inner chock is connected to an end of the cable and has an outer ramping surface. The at least one outer chock has an inner ramping surface complementarily corresponding to the outer ramping surface. The at least one outer chock is adapted for relative movement along a longitudinal axis of the cable with respect to the inner chock over a predetermined range wherein, in a first direction of movement, the inner and outer ramping surfaces slidingly cooperate to radially expand the expansion bolt and, in an opposite direction of the movement, the inner and outer ramping surfaces permit radial contraction of the expansion bolt. The at least one outer chock has a substantially cylindrical outer surface for making contact with the interior surface of a round hole. The outer surface includes a slip-resistant gripping pattern for increasing the slip-resistance of the at least one outer chock with respect to the hole when the expansion bolt is inserted and expanded therein.
Another alternative embodiment of an expansion bolt according to the present invention provides a cable, an inner chock, at least one outer chock, and a cleaning bushing. The inner chock is connected to an end of the cable and has at least a first outer ramping surface. The at least one outer chock has an inner ramping surface complementarily corresponding to the first outer ramping surface. The at least one outer chock is adapted for relative movement along a longitudinal axis of the cable with respect to the inner chock over a predetermined range wherein, in a first direction of movement, the inner and first outer ramping surfaces slidingly cooperate to radially expand the expansion bolt and, in an opposite direction of the movement, the inner and first outer ramping surfaces permit radial contraction of the expansion bolt. The cleaning bushing is slidably received on the cable so as to make contact, at a distal-most position of the cleaning bushing, with a proximal face of the inner chock.
Referring to
As is common in the art, the expansion bolt 10 includes a cable 12 having at a chock at a distal end thereof. According to the invention, a center chock 14 is provided having an outer surface 13 and a cooperating outer chock assembly 15 is provided to engage the center chock and to accommodate linear movement of the cable 12 along a longitudinal axis “L” with respect thereto. For example, the cable may be passed through a hole 18 in a collar 20 supporting the chock assembly 15.
The outer chock assembly 15 includes at least one outer chock, such as the outer chock referenced as 16, and preferably includes two or more outer chocks, such as the outer chocks referenced as 16 and 17. Each outer chock is preferably attached to the collar 20 through a respective elongate control cable or rod 22 that permits moving the outer chock upwardly along the longitudinal axis with respect to the inner chock by pushing upwardly on the collar 20.
The outer chocks 16 and 17 have inner surfaces 16a and 17a against which the outer surface 13 of the center chock 14 slides as a result of relative linear movement of the cable with respect to the collar 20. Particularly, when the collar 20 is pushed upwardly along the axis “L” in the direction of the arrow with respect to the cable, the outer chocks are forced radially outwardly, to provide an expanded configuration of the expansion bolt. When introduced into a hole, this outward expansion of the outer chocks is resisted by the inner surface of the hole, anchoring the expansion bolt in the hole. Conversely, when the collar is pulled downwardly with respect to the cable, the outer chocks are free to move inwardly toward the inner chock, or may be biased toward the inner chock by the respective control cables or rods 22, to provide a contracted configuration of the expansion bolt. This permits removing the expansion bolt from the hole.
Referring to
For example,
The complementarily frustoconical shapes provide a preferred means for ensuring intimate conformance between the respective ramping surfaces of the center and outer chocks over a range of relative linear movement therebetween, wherein the force exerted between the chocks is distributed over a maximum surface area. This increases reliability by decreasing stress and wear, as well as increases hole-engaging strength by permitting the aforementioned force to be maximized.
Two substantially identical outer chocks 16 and 17 are preferably provided to be azimuthally symmetrically disposed about the longitudinal axis “L” such as shown in
Azimuthal and radial symmetry of the chocks with respect to the longitudinal axis “L” each contribute to providing optimum holding strength in a cylindrical bore-hole in a homogeneous material; however, non-symmetric arrangements may be advantageous when the bore-hole is asymmetric or is bored into non-homogeneous material. Both the azimuthally symmetric disposition of the chocks and the rotationally symmetric form of the chock surfaces 13, 16a and 17a also contribute to achieving maximum robustness to relative rotation of the chocks about the longitudinal axis.
A loop 30 is provided at a proximal end of the cable 12 providing a hand-hold for a user of the expansion bolt 10, and a means for moving the cable with respect to the collar 20. A compression spring 32 is provided between the loop 30 and the collar 20, to bias the device into its expanded configuration. The compression spring is believed to provide outstanding advantages. Most importantly, it is believed that the constant force exerted by the spring on the outer chocks to urge the outer chocks into the hole with respect to the loop 30 protects against small amounts of slippage out of the hole that may otherwise occur as a result of the surface of the hole crumbling or deforming in response to the load applied to the loop 30. Even very small amounts of slippage may lead to a catastrophic loss of grip with potentially very serious consequences. In addition, the spring provides the outstanding convenience of urging the outer chocks into the hole with single-handed operation of the expansion bolt. With the spring 32 in place and the expansion bolt grasped in one hand like a syringe, e.g., the index and middle fingers are positioned on the collar 20 (at “A1” and “A2”, respectively, in
The spring 32 has a spring constant of at least 3 pounds per foot, and preferably in the range of about 4-7 pounds per foot.
The use of at least two outer chocks 16 and 17 along with the center chock 14 provides an outstanding advantage of the invention. Particularly, the center chock does not come into contact with the internal surfaces of the hole in which the expansion bolt is engaged. This distributes the force exerted between the center and outer chocks over the outer surface area of the outer chocks, and this force is in turn applied to the inner surfaces of the hole with a much reduced stress. This is particularly important when installing the expansion bolt in concrete, which is while strong in compression, is brittle and easily fractured by tensile stress, or asphalt, which is relatively weak. Further, the use of a centralized chock disposed substantially along the elongate axis of the hole and at least two outer chocks distributes the stress more symmetrically and therefore uniformly over the internal surface of the hole, reducing the potential for creating regions of relative overstress. These outstanding advantages open the door to a number of new applications for the expansion bolt, which have been recognized the present inventors.
As one of these applications, an emergency or temporary tent may be erected and anchored to a concrete or asphalt surface with the expansion bolt of the present invention. In the construction industry, the expansion bolt 10 may be used by drilling holes in structures as the need arises to provide a harness point for fall protection. The expansion bolt may be placed precisely where it is needed and removed immediately upon completion of the task so that it is not available for uncontrolled subsequent use by others. For moving large objects such as boulders, a single hole drilled in the object may provide a sufficient anchor. In that regard, the present inventors have constructed an expansion bolt according to the present invention with a 20 ton holding strength.
Emergency workers may drill holes in structures where needed to employ the expansion bolt 10 for anchoring ladders, hoists, or other structures or devices that must be deployed quickly and efficiently under difficult conditions. The expansion bolt 10 may be used in many different urban building materials, such as brick, concrete and even wood.
There are many other possibilities for using the expansion bolt 10 as a result of its outstanding features. Mentioned above are some uses that provide for quick assembly and disassembly. However, more permanent installations of the expansion bolt 10 may also be used due to its outstanding strength and versatility. Some examples are retrofitting bridges and other structures with tying cables to increase earthquake resistance, and tying one or more large objects together.
As an example of the latter, a double-ended version 50 of the expansion bolt 10, such as shown in
To hold the two objects together, the cable 58 must be tensioned with respect to the position of the outer chocks 52b, c and 54b, c. As one means for providing this tension, the coupler 56 may be linearly expandable and include a compression spring 60 to exert a force tending to force the outer chocks for each head apart from one. This force is communicated to the cable 58 through the ramping surfaces of the chocks. The objects 40A and 40B will be held together by friction between the interior surface of the hole and the outer surfaces of the outer chocks, which develops in response to the force exerted by the spring. To illustrate a fully equivalent means for providing the aforementioned tension, the coupler 56 may be provided so that it is not linearly expandable while the cable is provided with a tension spring for linearly contracting the cable.
Turning to
In the embodiment shown, the cleaning bushing has a large diameter to increase the size of the face 63, so the control cables or rods 22 slidably extend therethrough. A smaller diameter distal portion 69 may be used to make contact with the proximal face 67 of the center chock. It is generally desirable to provide a smaller diameter distal portion 69 of the cleaning bushing for making this contact, and such provision may be necessary where the diameter of the face 63 is larger than the diameter of the hole.
Turning to
A loop 80 is provided at a proximal end of the cable providing an anchoring eye for connection to, e.g., a safety harness. The cable is carried through the loop by a metal guard 82 for protecting the cable from being cut by anchoring hardware. The cable extends through a collar 84 that has an outer diameter “D” that is sized to fit the hole in which the expansion bolt 70 is to be inserted. The collar 84 bears on the surface of the object around the hole so that it is prevented from passing through the hole. The collar includes two, preferably flexible, control cables 86a, 86b attached respectively to the outer chocks.
The bolt 70 preferably has a cleaning bushing 73 similar to that described above in connection with
A compression spring 88 biases the collar 84 toward the distal end of the cable 78. The collar 84 in turn biases the outer chocks 72 through the control cables 86 so that the inner chock 76 wedges the outer chocks radially outwardly to expand the bolt 70. Preferably, the inner chock 76 is frustoconical, but any wedge shaped member could be used with one or more outer chocks having complementary or cooperative surfaces.
The bolt 70 includes an additional feature adapting it for gripping strong surfaces, such as the interior surfaces of metal tubing. Such tubing may be installed in pre-cast concrete panels for building construction, and can be used to provide anchor points for fall protection.
More particularly, referring in addition to
Other gripping patterns may be provided as desired. For example, the raised portions may be localized convexities such as bumps or other protrusions, and/or the relatively depressed portions may be localized concavities such as dimples or other recesses. Preferably, about 50% of the surface area of the outer surface area of the outer chocks is provided as relatively depressed portions with the remaining 50% of the surface area provided as raised portions, though this proportion can vary as well. As will be appreciated from the principle articulated above, the size of the relatively depressed portions is preferably sufficient to wholly receive the scale or other surface material that is anticipated to be loosened in the particular application.
It is to be recognized that, while a particular expansion bolt has been shown and described as preferred, other configurations and methods could be utilized, in addition to those already mentioned, without departing from the principles of the invention.
The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions to exclude equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.
This is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/749,728, filed Dec. 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,281.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1115205 | Johnson | Oct 1914 | A |
1469666 | Pleister et al. | Oct 1923 | A |
2570618 | Werner | Oct 1951 | A |
2774273 | Olson | Dec 1956 | A |
2835949 | Wengen et al. | May 1958 | A |
2896494 | Lerick | Jul 1959 | A |
3021745 | Libom | Feb 1962 | A |
3042094 | Liljeberg | Jul 1962 | A |
3139730 | Duane et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3147527 | Gilmore | Sep 1964 | A |
3216306 | Taylor | Nov 1965 | A |
3338128 | Taylor | Aug 1967 | A |
3352193 | Lerich | Nov 1967 | A |
3478641 | Dohmeier | Nov 1969 | A |
3903785 | Pepper, Jr. | Sep 1975 | A |
3948485 | Chouinard et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3957237 | Campbell | May 1976 | A |
4044976 | Campbell | Aug 1977 | A |
4069991 | Saunders et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4082241 | Burkey | Apr 1978 | A |
4108026 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4184657 | Jardine | Jan 1980 | A |
4422607 | Vallance | Dec 1983 | A |
4464076 | Leibhard | Aug 1984 | A |
4491291 | Ching | Jan 1985 | A |
4506924 | Nieder | Mar 1985 | A |
4518290 | Frichmann et al. | May 1985 | A |
4572464 | Phillips | Feb 1986 | A |
4575032 | Taylor | Mar 1986 | A |
4607992 | Mauritz et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4611963 | Frohlich et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4643377 | Christianson | Feb 1987 | A |
4643378 | Guthrie et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4715568 | Best, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
4773803 | Huegel et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4818163 | Bereiter et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4832289 | Waggoner | May 1989 | A |
4834327 | Byrne | May 1989 | A |
4869342 | Borst | Sep 1989 | A |
4923160 | Waggoner | May 1990 | A |
5042888 | Shinjo | Aug 1991 | A |
5154558 | McCallion | Oct 1992 | A |
5161916 | White et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5181816 | Walsh | Jan 1993 | A |
5253964 | Swemmer | Oct 1993 | A |
5256016 | Godfrey | Oct 1993 | A |
5344252 | Kakimoto | Sep 1994 | A |
5484132 | George et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5651650 | Herb et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5860629 | Reed | Jan 1999 | A |
5941668 | Kaibach et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6042069 | Christianson | Mar 2000 | A |
6062784 | Wisser et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068226 | Anders | May 2000 | A |
6092773 | Kieliszewski | Jul 2000 | A |
6109578 | Guthrie et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119993 | Youngblood et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6273379 | Phillips | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283426 | Guthrie et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299397 | Mengel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6375139 | Murray et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6493922 | Phillips | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6679466 | Brown | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6712544 | Kruger et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712572 | Bisping et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6729821 | Guthrie et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736359 | Murray | May 2004 | B2 |
6948573 | China et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20020014566 | Phillips | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020054805 | Kaibach et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020098054 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020162927 | Brown | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030017023 | Bisping et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030057337 | Brown | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030198529 | Warmolts et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040035992 | Watts | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040096288 | Haug et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040213633 | Guthrie et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040253075 | Liebig et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050037023 | Field, Jr. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050098696 | Lowe | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145765 | Petzl | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145766 | Petzl | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161565 | Tusting et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161566 | Tusting et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161567 | Tusting et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060231709 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10749728 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11374713 | US |