None.
Not Applicable.
Field
The present disclosure relates generally to systems for creating a durable seal between adjacent horizontal panels, including those which may be subject to temperature expansion and contraction or mechanical shear. More particularly, the present disclosure is directed to an expansion joint design for use in surfaces exposed to foot or vehicular traffic.
Description of the Related Art
Construction panels come in many different sizes and shapes and may be used for various purposes, including roadways, sideways, and pre-cast structures, particularly buildings. Historically, these have been formed in place. Use of precast concrete panels for floors, however, has become more prevalent. Whether formed in place or by use of precast panels, designs generally require forming a lateral gap or joint between adjacent panels to allow for independent movement, such in response to ambient temperature variations within standard operating ranges, building settling or shrinkage and seismic activity. Moreover, these joints are subject to damage over time. Most damage is from vandalism, wear, environmental factors and when the joint movement is greater, the seal may become inflexible, fragile or experience cohesive and/or adhesive failure. As a result, “long lasting” in the industry refers to a joint likely to be usable for a period greater than the typical lifespan of five (5) years. Various seals have been created in the field. Moreover, where in a horizontal surface exposed to wear, such as a roadway or walkway, it is often desirable to ensure that contaminants are retarded from contacting the seal and that the joint does not present a tripping hazard, whether as a result of a joint seal system which extends above the adjacent substrates or as a result of positioning the joint seal system below the surface of the substrates. This may be particularly difficult to address as the size of the expansion joint increases.
Various seal systems and configurations have been developed for imposition between these panels to provide seals or expansion joints to provide one or more of fire protection, waterproofing, sound and air insulation. This typically is accomplished with a seal created by imposition of multiple constituents in the joint, such as silicone application, backer bars, and compressible foams.
Expansion joint seal system designs for situations requiring the support of transfer loads have often required the use of rigid extruded rubber or polymer glands. These systems lack the resiliency and seismic movement required in expansion joints. These systems have been further limited in functioning as a fire resistant barrier, which is often a desired function.
Other systems have incorporated cover plates that span the joint itself, often anchored to the concrete or attached to the expansion joint material and which are expensive to supply and install. These systems sometimes require potentially undesirable mechanical attachment, which requires drilling into the deck or joint substrate. Cover plate systems that are not mechanically attached rely on support or attachment to the expansion joint, thereby subjecting the expansion joint seal system to continuous compression, expansion and tension on the bond line when force is applied to the cover plate, which shortens the life of the joint seal system. Some of these systems use foam to provide sealing. But these foam systems can take on a compression set when the joint seal system is repeatedly exposed to lateral forces from a single direction, such as a roadway. This becomes more pronounced as these foam systems utilize a single or continuous spine along the length of the expansion joint seal system—which propagates any deflection along the length. The problems and limitations of the current foam sealing cover plate systems that rely on a continuous spline are well known in the art.
These cover plate systems are designed to address lateral movement—the expansion and compression of adjacent panels. Unfortunately, these do no properly address vertical shifts—where the substrates become misaligned when the end of one shifts vertically relative to the other. In such situations, the components attached to the cover plate are likewise rotated in space causing a pedestrian or vehicular hazard. The current systems do not adequately address the differences in the coefficient of linear expansion between the cover plate and the substrate or allow for curved joint designs. The inability of the current art to compensate for the lateral or thermal movement of the cover plate results in failure of attachment to the cover plate or additional pressure being imposed on one half of the expansion joint system and potentially pulling the expansion joint system away from the lower substrate.
The present disclosure therefore meets the above needs and overcomes one or more deficiencies in the prior art by providing an expansion joint seal design which incorporates a plurality of ribs, a flexible member connecting the cover plate and the ribs, and may incorporate a load transfer plate to provide support to the rib from below, and/or foams of differing compressibilities, and therefore performs dynamically in response to changes. In particular, the present disclosure provides an alternative to the load transfer of an extruded gland or anchored cover plate, and does so without the movement limitations of extruded glands, and without the potential compression set, delamination or de-bonding found in these and foam expansion joints.
The disclosure provides an expansion joint seal system preferably comprising a cover plate, a plurality of ribs, a body of a resilient compressible foam sealant, wherein each of the ribs pierces the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant from the foam's top surface but does not extend to the foam's bottom surface, and having a flexible member connecting the cover plate to each of the ribs, wherein each of the plurality of ribs remains moveable in relation to the cover plate.
The disclosure provides an expansion joint seal system preferably comprising a cover plate, a plurality of ribs, a body of a resilient compressible foam sealant, wherein each of the ribs pierces the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant from the foam's top surface but does not extend to the foam's bottom surface, having a flexible member attached to the cover plate and to each of the ribs, wherein each of the plurality of ribs remains rotatable in relation to the cover plate, and having a force transfer plate to maintain the ribs in position with support from below.
The disclosure provides an expansion joint seal system preferably comprising a cover plate, a plurality of ribs, a body of a resilient compressible foam sealant, wherein each of the ribs pierces the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant from the foam's top surface but does not extend to the foam's bottom surface, having a flexible member attached to the cover plate and to each of the ribs, wherein each of the plurality of ribs remains rotatable in relation to the cover plate, and a second body of foam having a density different from the foam.
The disclosure provides an expansion joint seal system preferably comprising a cover plate, a plurality of ribs, a body of a resilient compressible foam sealant, wherein each of the ribs pierces the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant from the foam's top surface but does not extend to the foam's bottom surface, having a flexible member attached to the cover plate and to each of the ribs, wherein each of the plurality of ribs remains rotatable in relation to the cover plate, and the cover plate allows for linear thermal expansion, resistance to shock from impact.
The disclosure also provides an expansion joint seal system preferably comprising a body of a resilient compressible foam sealant which is strengthened by an internal compression spring, which may include a cover plate, a plurality of ribs, wherein the internal compression spring provides restorative and ongoing expansion force to maintain the seal of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant.
The disclosure provides an expansion joint seal system preferably comprising a cover plate, at least one rib, wherein each of the ribs pierces the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant from the foam's top surface but does not extend to the foam's bottom surface, a body of a resilient compressible foam sealant which is strengthened by an internal compression spring.
Additional aspects, advantages, and embodiments of the disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description of the various embodiments and related drawings.
So that the manner in which the described features, advantages, and objects of the disclosure, as well as others which will become apparent, are attained and can be understood in detail; more particular description of the disclosure briefly summarized above may be had by referring to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the drawings, which drawings form a part of this specification. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical preferred embodiments of the disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope as the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In the drawings:
An expansion joint seal system 100 is provided for imposition in a joint, such that a portion remains above the joint, i.e. partial imposition. The joint is formed of a first substrate 102 and a second substrate 104, which are each substantially co-planar with a first plane 106. The joint is formed as the first substrate 102 is separated, or distant, the second substrate 104 by a first distance 108. The first substrate 102 has a first substrate thickness 110, and has a first substrate end face 112 substantially perpendicular to the first plane 106. Likewise, the second substrate 104 has a second substrate thickness 114, and has a second substrate end face 116 substantially perpendicular to the first plane 106.
Referring to
The cover plate 120 is preferably made of a material sufficiently resilient to sustain and be generally undamaged by the surface traffic atop it for a period of at least five (5) years and of a material and thickness sufficient to transfer any loads to the substrates which it contacts. The cover plate 120 may be provided to present a solid, generally impermeable surface, or may be provided to present a permeable surface. The cover plate 120 has a cover plate width 122. To perform its function when positioned atop the expansion joint, and to provide a working surface, the cover plate width 122 typically is greater than the first distance 108. In some cases, it may be beneficial for a hinged ramp 144 to be attached to the edge of the cover plate 120. A ramp 144, hingedly attached to the cover plate 120 may provide a surface adjustment should the substrates 102, 104 become unequal in vertical position, such as if one substrate is lifted upward. A ramp 144 ensures that a usable surface is retained, even when the substrates 102, 104 cease to be co-planer, from the first substrate 102, to the cover plate 102, through to the second substrate 102. In the absence of such a ramp 144, movement of one substrate would result in the edge of the cover plate 102 being rotated upward—presenting a hazard to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Alternatively, rather than being positioned atop the expansion joint, the cover plate 120 may be installed flush or below the top of substrate 102 and/or installed flush or below the surface of substrate 104. The contact point for cover plate 120 may be the deck or wall substrate or may be a polymer or elastomeric material to reduce wear and to facilitate the movement function of the cover plate 120. Regardless of the intended position, the cover plate 120 may be constructed without restriction as to its profile. The cover plate 120 may be constructed of a single plate as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Referring to
The force transfer plate 226 need not retard the movement of each rib 124 as the movement of each rib 124 will be retarded by the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128. Flexible attachment of the ribs to the cover plate 120 and to the force transfer plate 226 permits multi-axis movement of the ribs 124 and the flexible member 134 in connection with cover plate 120. The force transfer plate 226 may be composed, or contain, hydrophilic or fire-retardant or other compositions that would be obvious to one skilled in the art. In the event of a failure of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 to retard water or to inhibit water penetration, a hydrophilic or hydrophobic composition on the force transfer plate 226 may react to inhibit further inflow of water. Additionally, the force transfer plate 226 may contain or bear and intumescing agent, so that upon exposure to high heat, the force transfer plate 226 may react, and provide protection to the expansion joint. The force transfer plate 226 is maintained in position at least by attachment or contact with the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128. The force transfer plate 226 may be positioned so as to contact and be adhered only to the foam bottom surface 132 of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128. Alternatively, the force transfer plate 226 may be positioned within the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 so that the edges of the force transfer plate 226 may extend into the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 and be supported from below by the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128. Preferably, the force transfer plate 226 is positioned within the lowest quarter of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 for maximum load force absorption. The force transfer plate 226 may be positioned higher in the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 in lighter duty or pedestrian applications.
The force transfer plate 226 does not attach to either of the substrates 102, 104 and is maintained in position by connection to the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128. The force transfer plate 226 may provide support from below for the ribs 124 which are not otherwise supported from below by the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128. In high cover plate shear conditions, the force transfer plate 226 supports a joint system which is wider or which uses a narrow depth, and uses the resistance to compression to retard each of the ribs 124 from shifting and delivering all of the compressive force to the trailing edge side of the expansion joint seal system 100. This reduces the ultimate force and the amount of compression by applying the compressive force over a larger area and at a 90 degree angle to the direct compressive force which adds longevity to the useful life compared to the prior art.
Preferably, the force transfer plate 226 is sufficiently wide to maximize load transfer. The force transfer plate 226 can be up to or greater than 50% of the width of the expansion joint in seismic applications requiring +/−50% movement. Referring to
As provided in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Alternatively, as depicted in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The cover plate 120 may be detachably attached to the flexible member 134. Expansion joint seals are often installed under conditions where mechanical strikes against the cover plate 120 are likely, such as roadways in locales which use snow plows. When used, snow plows employ a blade positioned at the roadway surface to scrape snow and ice from the roadway for removal. Any objects which extend above the roadway surface sufficient to contact the plow are likely to ripped from the roadway surface. It may therefore be preferable for the cover plate 120 to be detachably attached magnetically to the flexible member 134 and retained with a tether 180 to prevent the cover plate 120 from falling into the joint between the substrates 102, 104. This embodiment permits snow plow strikes on the cover plate 120 without permanent damage to the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 or the balance of the expansion joint seal system 100. The tether 180, which may be also attached to the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128, may further prevent the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 from sagging away from the cover plate 120, a problem known in the prior art. The tether 180 may be highly flexible, resilient material sufficient to sustain the impact load and sufficiently durable to do so the life of the joint system 100. The support of the foam seal is of particular (or increased) importance where the foam joint seal is in a width to depth ratio of less than 1:1. Alternatively, the cover plate 120 may be detachably attached to the flexible member 134 using screws, bolts or other devices prepared to break-away in the event of a strike. The flexible member 134 may also be constructed to break apart in the event of a strike. Where the flexible member 124 is provided as a hinge, the first member 302 of the flexible member 124 may be constructed of a high strength polymer, but which is still weaker than the associated second member 304.
Referring to
Referring to
When desired, the compressibility of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 may be altered by forming the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 from two foams of differing compressibility, providing a different spring force on the two sides of the ribs 124. Unequal densities, and thus spring forces, may provide a desirable spring force in the direction of movement of the traffic above, such as a roadway or one side of a concourse, to return the ribs 124 to the original position and to avoid the potential for a compression set over time due to the unequal application of movement to the expansion joint seal system 100. This may be accomplished by the foam in the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 on one side of the ribs 124 having a first foam body density and the foam in the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 on opposing side of the ribs 124 having a second foam body density. Alternatively, the foam in the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 on one side of the ribs 124 may be homogenous, while the foam in the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 on the opposing side of the ribs 124 may be a composite, such as a laminate of two foams. Having differing and complementary densities in the two bodies of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 between the top and the bottom portions of the bodies of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 on each side of the ribs 124 provides for lower resistance on one side to allow for quicker equalization or recovery of the opposing high density foam that is subject to repeated compressive force. This same combination works at the top and bottom of each rib 124 so that there is more resistance to compression set on the top high density portion due to the rotational force at the ribs 124 caused by the differing densities such that the high density foam on the bottom opposing side (the side of the ribs 124 which would normally extend not compress) compresses and absorbs or offsets some of the high compressive force. Because of the lower density foam on the opposing bottom side it allows better expansion recovery of the high density than if it was of equal density or compression.
While each of the ribs 124 pierces the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 at the foam top surface 130, the rib bottom surface 140 does not extend to the foam bottom surface 132. As a result, the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 is not pierced through by the ribs 124. The body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 thus provides support to each of the ribs 124 from below. Additionally, the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 provides lateral forces against each side of each of the ribs 124, maintaining each rib 124 in position relative to the two substrates 102, 104. Beneficially, where the ribs 124 do not pierce the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128, the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 remains integral such that a portion of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 provides a seal against outside contaminates in the expansion joint, to seal and support the bottom of the rib 124, the rib bottom surface 140. The present disclosure thus provides a seal against contaminants following a rib 124 through the seal, and allows for extra wide joint systems without the added expense depth requirements of systems without a bottom support. Some or all of the ribs 124 may be electrically conductive or be composed, or contain, hydrophilic or fire-retardant compositions. Some or all of the ribs 124 may further include a radio frequency identification device to transmit internal data when needed or may include cathodic protections. In the event of a failure of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 to retard water or to inhibit water penetration, a hydrophilic or hydrophobic composition on the rib 124 may react to inhibit further inflow of water. Additionally, each rib 124 may contain or bear an intumescing agent, so that upon exposure to high heat, the rib 124 may react, and provide protection to the expansion joint.
As provided in
Referring to
Moreover, the expansion joint seal system 100 may be initially installed such that the ribs 124 are angled against the intended flow of traffic when the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 is composed of three or more foam members, such that a foam at the top of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 which is to be in compression due to traffic is of a higher density foam and that the opposing side, lower edge is likewise of a higher density foam. Because the relative force of the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 determines the position of the ribs 124, equal densities maintain the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 in an intermediate position, one which limits operation to a maximum of 50% of the joint width for compression. Varied foam densities in the body of a resilient compressible foam sealant 128 on the two sides of the ribs 124, provides an additional 10-20% more compressive resistance to traffic impact. This improvement may be particularly beneficial in situations such as the down ramp in a parking garage where traffic attempts to decelerate while traveling over the joint cover 120, as this repeated circumstance will wear out an a joint based on evenly compressed and evenly offsetting force foam joints.
The ribs 124 need not be uniformly positioned. The ribs 124 may be positioned in staggered relationship such that no more than one half of the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 can be subject to compression. The balance of the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 resists the compression outside direct force of the ribs 124. The portion of the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 in compression may be further altered by angling the ribs 124 so as to subject less than half of the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 to direct compression. This allows the balance of the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 to be in a state of less compression and for the portion of the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 have a less compression to run longitudinally along the joint such that at any one point in the length of the joint the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 is in lower compression contact with the ribs 124, reducing compression set and creating a mechanical locking relationship between the resilient compressible foam sealant 128 and the ribs 124. These ribs 124 may be attached to the force transfer plate 226. Moreover, by directing the various ribs 124 at differing angles within the 124, the ribs 124 may entangle the body of resilient compressible foam sealant 128 so as to make it integral with the ribs 124 and, by extension, to the cover plate.
Referring to
Referring again to
Referring to
Referring to
The system 100 may be supplied in individual components or may be supplied in a constructed state so that it may installed in an economical one step operation yet perform like more complicated multipart systems. The entire system 100 may be constructed such that a gap is present between the cover plate 120 and the resilient compressible foam sealant 128 and a retaining band positioned about the resilient compressible foam sealant 128 to maintain compression during shipping and before installation without additional spacers that would limit test fitting of the system 100 prior to releasing the resilient compressible foam sealant 128 from factory compression. Packaging materials, that increase the bulk and weight of the product for shipping and handling to and at the point of installation, are therefore also eliminated.
The foregoing disclosure and description is illustrative and explanatory thereof. Various changes in the details of the illustrated construction may be made within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention. The present invention should only be limited by the following claims and their legal equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
945914 | Colwell | Apr 1909 | A |
1371727 | Blickle | Mar 1921 | A |
2544532 | Hill | Mar 1951 | A |
2995056 | Knox | Oct 1960 | A |
3262894 | Green | Jul 1966 | A |
3334557 | Fitzgibbon | Aug 1967 | A |
3449879 | Bloom | Jun 1969 | A |
3492250 | Deyrup | Jan 1970 | A |
3712188 | Worson | Jan 1973 | A |
3772220 | Porter et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3827204 | Walters | Aug 1974 | A |
3883475 | Racky et al. | May 1975 | A |
4018539 | Puccio | Apr 1977 | A |
4058947 | Earle et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4134875 | Tapia | Jan 1979 | A |
4181711 | Ohashi et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4224374 | Priest | Sep 1980 | A |
4288559 | Illger | Sep 1981 | A |
4401716 | Tschudin-Mahrer | Aug 1983 | A |
4455396 | Al-Tabaqchall et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4564550 | Tschudin-Mahrer | Jan 1986 | A |
4566242 | Dunsworth | Jan 1986 | A |
4674252 | Nicholas | Jun 1987 | A |
4767655 | Tschudin-Mahrer | Aug 1988 | A |
4784516 | Cox | Nov 1988 | A |
4839223 | Tschudin-Mahrer | Jun 1989 | A |
4922676 | Spronken | May 1990 | A |
4992481 | von Bonin et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5007765 | Dietlein et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5048249 | Shreiner | Sep 1991 | A |
5130176 | Baerveldt | Jul 1992 | A |
5173515 | von Bonin | Dec 1992 | A |
5253459 | Parinas et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5327693 | Schmid | Jul 1994 | A |
5335466 | Langohr | Aug 1994 | A |
5575126 | Attaway | Nov 1996 | A |
5686174 | Irrgeher | Nov 1997 | A |
5744199 | Joffre et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5791111 | Beenders | Aug 1998 | A |
5935695 | Baerveldt | Aug 1999 | A |
6039503 | Cathey | Mar 2000 | A |
6418688 | Jones, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6491468 | Hagen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6666618 | Anaya et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6698146 | Morgan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6928777 | Cordts | Aug 2005 | B2 |
8317444 | Hensley | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8341908 | Hensley et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8365495 | Witherspoon | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8720138 | Hilburn, Jr. | May 2014 | B2 |
8739495 | Witherspoon | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8813449 | Hensley et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8813450 | Hensley et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8870506 | Hensley et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8935897 | Shaw | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9068297 | Hensley et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9200437 | Hensley et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9206596 | Robinson | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9404581 | Robinson | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9677266 | Witherspoon et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9689157 | Hensley | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9689158 | Hensley | Jun 2017 | B1 |
20030005657 | Visser et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040035075 | Trout | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040093815 | Cordts | May 2004 | A1 |
20050034389 | Boot | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060053710 | Miller et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060117692 | Trout | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070059516 | Vincent et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080172967 | Hilburn | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080268231 | Deib | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100275539 | Shaw | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120022176 | Stahl et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120117900 | Shaw | May 2012 | A1 |
20130055667 | Beele | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130104483 | Hensley et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140219719 | Hensley et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140360118 | Hensley et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150023755 | Hensley et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150068139 | Witherspoon | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150259905 | Hensley et al. | Sep 2015 | A9 |
20150275508 | Hensley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160047242 | Hensley et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1280007 | Feb 1991 | CA |
1334268 | Feb 1995 | CA |
2296779 | Nov 2006 | CA |
4426280 | Apr 1996 | DE |
10 2005 054 375 | May 2007 | DE |
3942107 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1540220 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1983119 | Apr 2007 | EP |
977929 | Dec 1964 | GB |
1359734 | Jul 1974 | GB |
1495721 | Dec 1977 | GB |
1519795 | Aug 1978 | GB |
2251623 | Jul 1992 | GB |
2359265 | Aug 2001 | GB |
03006109 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Iso Chemie GmbH; Iso-Flame Kombi F120; Jul. 1 2006; 2 pages. |
IsoChemie; Technical Datasheet blocostop F-120; Jul. 26 2002; 1 page. |
Lester Hensley; Where's the Beef in Joint Sealants? Hybrids Hold the Key; Spring 2001; Applicator vol. 23 No. 2; 5 pages (alternative version available at http://www.emseal.com/InTheNews/2001HybridsConstructionCanada.pdf). |
MM Systems; ejp Expansion Joints EIF; Nov. 16 2007; 2 pages. |
MM Systems; ejp Expansion Joints; Nov. 16, 2007; 2 pages. |
MM Systems; MM ColorJoint/SIF Series; 3 pages; Jan. 14, 2007. |
Norton Performance Plastics Corporation; Norseal V740FR; 1996; 2 pages. |
PCT/US2005/036849 filed Oct. 4 2005 by Emseal Corporation; 11 pages; published Mar. 1, 2007 by World Intellectual Property Organization as WO 2007/024246. |
Promat; Promaseal FyreStrip Seals for Movement in Joints in Floors/Walls; Feb. 2006; 4 pages. |
Promat; Promaseal Guide for linear gap seals and tire stopping systems; 20 pages; Jun. 2008. |
Promat; Promaseal IBS Foam Strip Penetration Seals on Floors/Walls; Sep. 2004; 6 pages. |
Promat; Promaseal IBS Safety Data Sheet; Jul. 25, 2007; 3 pages. |
Salamander Industrial Products Inc.; Blocoband HF; Feb. 15, 1996; 1 page. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Color Econoseal Technical Data; Nov. 18, 2005; 2 pages. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Sealtite “B” Technical Data; Oct. 28, 2005; 2 pages. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Sealtite Airstop AR; Apr. 2004; 1 page. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Sealtite Airstop AR; Apr. 2007; 1 page. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Sealtite Standard; May 9, 2007; 2 pages. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Sealtite Technical Data; Oct. 28, 2005; 2 pages. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Sealtite VP (600) Technical Data; 2002; 2 pages. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Seismic Sealtite II Technical Data; Sep. 20, 2006; 2 pages. |
Schul International Co. LLC; Seismic Sealtite Technical Data; Oct. 28, 2005; 2 pages. |
Lee W. Young, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US06/60096, dated Oct. 23, 2007, 4 pages, USPTO, USA. |
Schul International Inc.; Sealtite 50N Technical Data; 2002; 2 pages. |
Schul International Inc.; Sealtite 50N Technical Data; Oct. 28, 2005; 2 pages. |
Schul International Inc.; Sealtite 50N; Oct. 28 2005; 2 pages. |
Schul International Inc.; Sealtite VP; Oct. 28, 2005; 2 pages. |
Schul International Inc.; Sealtite; Jul. 25, 2008; 3 pages. |
Sealant Waterproofing & Restoration Institute; Sealants: The Professionals' Guide p. 26; 1995; 3 pages. |
Stein et al. “Chlorinated Paraffins as Effective Low Cost Flame Retardants for Polyethylene” Dover Chemical Company 9 pages. |
Tremco illbruck B.V.; Cocoband 6069; Apr. 2007; 2 pages. |
Tremco illbruck Limited; Alfacryl FT Intumescent Acrylic; Oct. 22, 2007; 2 pages. |
Tremco illbruck Limited; Alfasil FR Oct. 22, 2007; 2 pages. |
Tremco illbruck Limited; Compriband 600; Oct. 5, 2007; 2 pages. |
Tremco illbruck Limited; Compriband Super FR; Dec. 4, 2007; 2 pages. |
Tremco illbruck Limited; Technical Data Sheet Product Compriband Super FR; Oct. 18, 2004; 4 pages. |
Tremco Illbruck Limited; Technical Data Sheet Product: Compriband Super; Sep. 29, 2004; 3 pages. |
Tremco illbruck Limited; TechSpec Division Façade & Roofing Solutions; Mar. 2005; 10 pages. |
Tremco illbruck; Alfas Bond; Apr. 13, 2007; 2 pages. |
Tremco Illbruck; illmod 600; Jun. 2006; 2 pages. |
Tremco illbruck; The Specification Product Range; Feb. 2007; 36 pages. |
Tremco-illbruck Ltd.; Webbflex B1 PU Foam; Nov. 9, 2006; 2 pages. |
Thomas Dunn, International Preliminary Report on Patentability—PCT/US06/60096, dated Oct. 21, 2008, 6 pages, USPTO, USA. |
Underwriter Laboratories Inc.; UL 2079 Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems; Jun. 30, 2008; 38 pages. |
Underwriter Laboratories LLC; System No. WW-S-0007 Joint Systems; Dec. 5, 1997 pages. |
Underwriters Laboratories; Fire-resistance ratings ANSI/UL 263; 2014; 24 pages. |
Underwriters Laboratories; UL 263 Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials; Apr. 4, 2003; 40 pages. |
Lee W. Young, International Search Report, PCT/US06/60096, Oct. 23, 2007, 2 pages, USPTO, USA. |
Stein et al. “Chlorinated Paraffins as Effective Low Cost Flame Retardants for Polyethylene” Dover Chemical Company 9 pages, Aug. 3, 2013. |
Adolf Wurth GmbH & Co. KG; 81 Elastic Joint Sealing Tape; retrieved Aug. 5, 2005; 4 pages. |
Amber Composites; Expanding PU Foam Technical Data Sheet (Premier BG1); Feb. 1997; 2 pages. |
ASTM International; ASTM E84-04; 2004; 19 pages. |
ASTM International; Designation E 176 -07 Standard Terminology of Fire Standards; 2007; 20 pages. |
ASTM International; Standard Terminology of Fire Standards; Nov. 11, 2014; 20 pages. |
Auburn Manufacturing Company; Auburn Product News—R-10400M; Dec. 2007; 1 page. |
AWCI Construction Dimensions; Where's the Beef in Joint Sealants? Hybrids Hold the Key by Lester Hensley; Jan. 2006 3 pages. |
British Board of Agrement; Compriband 600 Sealing Tapes—Certificate 96/3309; Jul. 14, 2005; 8 pages. |
British Board of Agrement; Compriband Super-Certificate 97/3331; Aug. 2, 2005; 4 pages. |
British Board of Agrement; Illmod 600 Sealing Tapes; Mar. 26, 2003; 8 pages. |
British Standards Institute; Translation—NEN 6069; Oct. 1991; 31 pages. |
British Standards Institution; Fire tests on building materials and structures (BS476:Part 20); 1987; 44 pages. |
Building and Engineering Standards Committee; Impregnated cellular plastics strips for sealing external joints—DIN 18542; Jan. 1999; 10 pages. |
BuildingTalk; Choosing a sealant for building applications by Lester Hensley CEO and President of Emseal; May 21, 2007; 6 pages. |
Centre for Fire Research; Determination of the Fire Resistance According to NEN 6069 of Joints in a Wall Sealed with Cocoband 6069 Impregnated Foam Strip; Nov. 1996; 19 pages. |
DIN ev; Fire behavior of building materials and building components; Sep. 1977; 11 pages. |
DIN ev; Fire behavior of building materials and building components; May 1998; 33 pages. |
DIN ev; Fire behavior of building materials and elements; Mar. 1994; 144 pages. |
Dow Corning; Dow Corning 790 Silicone Building Sealant; 1999; 8 pages. |
Dow Corning; Dow Corning 790 Silicone Building Sealant; 2000; 6 pages. |
Dow Corning; Dow Corning 790 Silicone Building Sealant; 2004; 4 pages. |
Dow Coming; Dow Corning Firestop 400 Silicone Sealant; Jan. 15, 2001; 4 pages. |
Dow Coming; Dow Corning Firestop 700 Silicone Sealant; Jan. 15, 2001; 6 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd.; Horizontal Colorseal Aug. 2000 2 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd.; Colorseal PC/SA Stick; 1 page; Jun. 7, 1995. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd.; SJS-100-CHT-RN; 1 page; Nov. 20, 2007. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; 20H System Tech Data; Jun. 1997; 2 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; Colorseal Aug. 2000 2 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; DSH System; Nov. 2005; 2 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; Fire-Rating of Emseal 20H System; Author of “LH”; Feb. 17, 1993/Apr. 18, 1993; 2 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; Horizontal Colorseal Tech Data; Jun. 1997; 2 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; Preformed Sealants and Expansion Joint Systems; May 2002; 4 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; Preformed Sealants and Expansion Joints.; Jan. 2002; 4 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems Ltd; Seismic Colorseal; Apr. 1998; 2 pages. |
Emseal Joint Systems; Seismic Colorseal; Aug. 2000; 2 pages. |
Emseal; Benchmarks of Performance for High Movement Acrylic-Impregnated Precompressed Foam Sealants; Aug. 21, 2007; 7 pages (as captured by Archive.org). |
Emseal; Seismic Colorseal-DS (Double Sided); Apr. 12, 2007; 4 pages. |
Envirograf; Fire Kills; 2004; 8 pages available by at least Nov. 10, 2006 per Archive.org. |
Fire Retardants Inc.; Fire Barrier CP 25WB + Caulk; 2002; 4 pages. |
IBMB; Test 3002/2719—Blocostop F120; Mar. 24, 2000; 14 pages. |
IBMB; Test 3263/5362—Firestop N; Jul. 18, 2002; 13 pages. |
IBMB; Test 3568/2560; Sep. 30; 2005; 14 pages. |
IFT Rosenheim; Evidence of Performance—Test Report 105 32469/1e U R1; Apr. 19, 2006; 8 pages. |
Illbruck Bau-Produkte GmbH u Co. KG; Willseal Firestop; Sep. 30, 1995; 2 pages. |
Illbruck Inc.; Will-Seal 250 Spec Data; Aug. 1989; 2 pages. |
Illbruck International; willseal the joint sealing tape; Jan. 1991; 19 pages. |
Illbruck Sealant Systems inc..; Illbruck Willseal 600; Sep. 2001; 2 pages. |
Illbruck USA; MSDS—Willseal 150/250 and/or EPS; Jul. 21, 1986; 2 pages. |
Illbruck/USA; Will-Seal 150 Spec Data; Nov. 1987; 2 pages. |
Iso Chemie GmbH; Iso-Bloco 600; 2 pages; Jul. 1, 2006. |
Specified Technologies, Inc.; Product Data Sheet PEN200 Silicone Foam; 2003; 2 pages; publication location unknown. |
Specified Technologies, Inc.; Product Data Sheet SpecSeal Series ES Elastomeric Sealant; 2004; 4 pages; publication location unknown. |
Specified Technologies, Inc.; Product Data Sheet SpecSeal Series ES Elastomeric Sealant; 2000; 4 pages; publication location unknown. |
Specified Technologies, Inc.; Product Data Sheet PEN300 Silicone Foam; 2004; 4 pages; publication location unknown. |
Specified Technologies, Inc.; Firestop Submittal Package; 2000; 37 pages; publication location unknown. |
Dow Corning 890-SL Self-Leveling Silicone Joint Sealant, 2005, 4 pages, USA. |
Emseal BEJS System—Bridge Expansion Joint System, May 26, 2010, 5 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., retrieved on Mar. 30, 2016 from https://web.archive.org/web/20100526081854/http://www.emseal.com/products/infrastructure/BridgeJointSeals/BEJSBridgeJointSystem.htm. |
Emseal Acrylic Log Home Tape Installation Instructions, Jun. 2011, 1 page, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., retrieved on Mar. 30, 2016 from https://web.archive.org/web/20160330181621/http://www.emseal.com/Products/Specialty/LogHome/AcrylicLogHome—Tapes—Install—X.pdf. |
Horizontal Colorseal Tech Data, Jun. 1997, 2 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd. |
20H System Data Sheet, Sep. 1996. |
20H System Tech Data, Jun. 1997, 2 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., USA. |
BEJS System, Mar. 2009, 2 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., USA. |
Emseal's new Universal-90 expansion joints, Buildingtalk, Mar. 27, 2009, 2 pages, Pro-Talk Ltd. |
Emseal Emshield DFR2 System DFR3 System Tech Data, May 2010, 4 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., USA. |
Seismic Colorseal by Emseal, Aug. 21, 2007, 4 pages, Emseal Corporation, USA. |
Universal 90's, Aug. 4, 2009, 4 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., USA. |
Backerseal (Greyflex), Sep. 2001, 2 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., USA. |
Install Data—Horizontal Colorseal—with Epoxy Adhesive, Jun. 1997, 2 pages, Emseal Joint Systems, Ltd., USA. |
Shane Thomas, International Search Report (PCT/US17/17132), dated May 4, 2017, 2 pages, United States Patent & Trademark Office as Searching Authority, Alexandria, Virginia, USA. |
Shane Thomas, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority (PCT/US17/17132), May 4, 2017, 4 pages, United States Patent & Trademark Office as Searching Authority, Alexandria, Virginia, USA. |
PCT Recordation of Search History (PCT/US17/17132), Undated, 4 pages, United States Patent & Trademark Office as Searching Authority, Alexandria, Virginia, USA. |