Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to multihull boats, and more particularly to multihull boats with an extendable platform.
Related Art
There have been many alternative designs that seek to increase the deck space for watercraft on pontoons, including laterally extending decks and longitudinally extending decks. When extending the deck space longitudinally using a ramp, many prior art ramps do not provide any buoyancy to the section of the ramp being extended and others may have negligible buoyancy and slope downward and dip to near water level or at the water level, allowing sections of the deck to be splashed and get wet. Further, such ramps are unstable, particularly in rough weather or choppy water.
The present invention provides an increase in deck space by extending a lower deck longitudinally, while also providing additional longitudinal buoyancy that maintains the elevation of the lower deck above the surface of the water in a near parallel arrangement to the upper deck and avoiding the sloping of the lower deck to water level. The increased buoyancy for the lower deck compensates for the increased structure being supported, which stabilizes the lower deck, even in rough waters. The extended space does not slope toward the water, providing a stable, safe surface to sit, walk or stand.
There are a number of different designs for boats with longitudinally extending decks. As an example of a longitudinally extending deck with a flotation device, U.S. Pat. No. 6,868,799 discloses an extendable ramp with a small cylindrical float located at the end of the ramp. The ramp slopes toward the water and the end of the ramp is essentially level with the water. This patent clearly teaches away from the present invention that provides longitudinal buoyancy to lift the deck and provide stability. As an example of a longitudinally extending deck without any flotation device, U.S. Pat. No. 8,056,496 discloses an extendable deck for a pontoon boat that is stowed under the main deck. The extendable deck has no flotation devices attached, but is levered from the bow of the boat. As the deck is extended beyond its half retracted position, the end of the floating deck begins sloping down and the deck designed to require support by a beach or a boat dock when it is fully extended. This patent likewise teaches away from the claimed invention having longitudinal buoyancy and its resulting stability and safety.
None of the prior art references discloses a secondary deck that is buoyantly supported by pontoons or any other flotation device when the secondary deck is stowed beneath the main deck to which the secondary deck is slidably connected. In addition to providing extra deck space, a secondary deck that has its own buoyant support that is operative when the deck is stowed and when the deck is extended can provide increased stability to the watercraft while maintaining the loading capacity of the watercraft. Known watercraft that merely add slidable planks, ramps or decks which do not offset the weight of these features with an increase in the buoyancy of the watercraft necessarily increase the total weight and therefore reduce the loading capacity of the watercraft. When a float on a ramp is only operable when the ramp is deployed, there is no increase in the buoyancy of the watercraft when the ramp is stowed and this can reduce the stability of the watercraft if the ramp is added to an existing watercraft design. Even if the abeam pontoons are sized larger to accommodate the addition of a ramp, the extension of a ramp that is not supported while it is stowed will necessarily produce a cantilevering effect that will increase the stress on the main deck structure and will also change the boat's attitude in the water while the ramp is cantilevered.
There are also a number of multihull boat designs in which a smaller boat fits between the pontoons or other abeam hull structures of a larger boat, and the smaller boat is secured to the larger boat through various releasable connections. These designs have different configurations and arrangements of the smaller boat and the larger boat, with some smaller boats providing the propulsion for the larger boat while in other cases the larger boat has its own propulsion, and the smaller boat may have propulsion or not In the various alternative designs, the smaller boat may be secured through connections at either the stern or the bow of the larger boat. When the smaller boat is secured at the stern of the larger boat, the larger boat could have a frame, telescoping legs or other structure that extends and retracts in slide retainers or other brackets and releasably connects to the smaller boat, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,815,541 and 7,987,803. The smaller boat may maintain its waterline when it is connected to the larger boat, such as in the '803 Patent, or it be partially lifted out of the water, such as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,659,546 and 3,815,541, or lifted entirely out of the water, such as in U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2014/0041569. Regardless of the particular configurations and arrangements of such smaller boats secured between the abeam hulls of a larger boat, all of these designs are similar in their use of releasable connections between the smaller and larger boats. The releasable connections between the smaller and larger boats are necessary for launching the smaller boat. Accordingly, although the smaller boat has its own deck and hull apart from the deck of the larger boat, there are no permanent fasteners, stops or other fixed connections that prevent the smaller boat from being deployed because any such connections would defeat the intended purpose of the smaller boat to be launched and separate from the larger boat.
In addition to increasing the extra deck space of a boat, it would also be beneficial to increase the storage space for items that enhance the overall enjoyment of the boat. Known watercraft that merely add slidable planks, ramps or decks certainly improve the functionality of the boat, but these additional features cannot increase the storage space, and they are limited in their usage. The combination of a smaller boat with a larger boat can allow for additional storage space, but the items that can be stowed in the smaller boat are limited if the smaller boat is going to maintain its intended purpose of being launched from the larger boat. Additionally, in order for the storage space in the smaller boat to be usable, it should be readily accessible. Accordingly, the smaller boat does not provide any significant increase in the usable storage space for items that would enhance the overall enjoyment of the boat.
An upper deck is supported on a bottom side by one or more abeam pontoons or a pier structure. A lower deck is located beneath the upper deck, and the decks are slidably connected through a pair of longitudinally elongated guides that are fixedly connected to the bottom side of the upper deck between the abeam pontoons or the piers. The lower deck and has a stowed position underneath the upper deck and an extended position out from underneath the upper deck. Longitudinal buoyancy is provided the lower deck by means of one or more amidships pontoons or a monohull.
In one aspect of the present invention, the lower deck and its monohull provide additional usable storage space as well as increased deck space. To provide additional usable storage space, one or more panels in the lower deck can be opened when the deck is in its extended position to permit access to one or more storage containers that are attached to and fitted within the frame between the pair of amidships pontoons or abeam of a single center pontoon or in an internal storage hold formed between the lower deck and a monohull.
In another aspect of the present invention, an accessory that is contained in the storage space beneath the lower deck is extracted and installed on the deck or is raised from its folded configuration on the hull or is uncovered for access from the open deck. Example accessories include a pool liner insert, a hot tub liner insert, a slide and ladder assembly, a seat and mounting bracket assembly, a volleyball net and pole assembly, an umbrella and pole assembly, a hammock and stand assembly, a seat lift, and an expandable deck insert.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings which are described in the detailed description below.
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
As generally shown in
As shown in
As shown in
It will also be appreciated that it is possible that the side extensions may be further supported by an optional truss that may also be extended from a stowed position under the upper deck. An example cantilevered truss system would be a series of sliders that extend from the frame 52 beneath the lower deck 50 similar to loper supports of hinged secretary desks (drop front desks). In one embodiment the wings are manually opened and closed, although it will be appreciated that an actuation system could be used to mechanize the folding and unfolding operations. As with some secretary desks, the sliders could automatically extend from the frame through gears or levers that connect the sliders to the foldable wings 90a so the slider supports could automatically extend and retract when the wings are opened and closed, respectively, regardless of whether the folding/unfolding operations are manual or mechanized.
Additionally, the foldable structures could be railings 92, such as retractable or otherwise foldable handrails. It is also possible that the ends of the expandable panels may include foldable railings that can be unfolded when the wings are unfolded. Examples of retractable handrails 92a and foldable handrails 92b with laterally expandable deck surfaces 90 are shown in
The increased buoyancy and stability of multiple amidships pontoons for the lower deck may be particularly beneficial for the foldable wings' additional weight and cantilevered structure. However, as shown in
As shown in
The guide rails 40 generally described above are preferably formed from a pair of C-channels 40a as shown in
Just as there are several options to connect the lower deck to the upper deck through various guide systems, there are different ways to actuate the lower deck and move it between its retracted and extended positions. Alternative actuator systems for moving the lower deck 50 relative to the upper deck 10 are shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the actuator 150 uses ram power, a telescoping hydraulic linear actuator 154 can have a fixed outer cylinder 154a and an inner rod 154b that extends from the outer cylinder. The outer cylinder is fixed to the upper deck structure at the actuator's aft end 150′, such as through attachment to the motor housing that is either directly connected to the upper deck or can be indirectly connected to the upper deck through an actuator bracket that is attached to the aft end section of the guide rails as described in detail below with reference to
In the preferred operation of the present invention, the lower deck is not designed with sufficient structural strength to accommodate powered travel along the water when the lower deck is fully or partially extended. Accordingly, there could be a propulsion power kill switch which prevents the watercraft's motor from being started while the lower deck is moved from its stowed position. It will also be appreciated that there could be a mechanical failure in the actuator system which prevents the powered retraction of the lower deck into its stowed position. Therefore, a manual actuator could also be provided with the secondary deck. For example, as shown in
A limit switch on the actuator 150 can prevent the lower deck from extending past the limit of its fully extended position 80. Additionally, there can be a failsafe physical hard stop 160 apart from the actuator that prevents the lower deck 50 and its hull 60 from breaking the their connections to the actuator and to the upper deck 10 and its pontoons 30. For example in the embodiment shown in
The overall buoyancy of the watercraft 12 does not vary depending on whether the lower deck retracted in its stowed position beneath the upper deck or is extended out from the upper deck, but as shown in
According to the present invention, the lower deck and its guide and actuator systems could be specially designed and produced with new watercraft. Alternatively, the lower deck and its accompanying systems could be designed for retrofitting existing watercraft, regardless of the age of the watercraft or the brand of watercraft. By retrofitting existing watercraft, older pontoon boats can be updated for weight capacity, horsepower and other improvements without the expense of an entirely new boat. With a standard size pontoon, there is approximately one hundred pounds (100 lbs) of buoyancy per linear foot of the additional amidships pontoons. For example, an improvement of a standard twenty-four foot (24 ft) pontoon boat 12a according to the present invention could add as much as thirty-two hundred pounds (3,200 lbs) of buoyancy to a standard pontoon boat, and a standard tritoon conversion could add as much as one thousand pounds (1,000 lbs) of buoyancy. As discussed above, the increased buoyancy of the amidships pontoons should be at least as much as is required to maintain the weight of the lower deck in approximately the same waterline when it is extended as when it is stowed.
It will be appreciated that the present invention can be used with any multi-deck, multihull watercraft 12 as well as other floating multi-deck platforms and structures 14. An example of a triple-hulled catamaran 12b, a trimaran, is shown in
With regard to docks 14 in particular, it will be appreciated that the lower deck and its accompanying systems as described herein and recited in the claims can be connected to a floating dock or any other type of a stationary dock, including a permanent dock supported by piers. For a dock on piers, it will be appreciated that there is a space for the lower deck between the piers beneath the bottom of the dock and the water under the dock which may vary with tides or the height of a lake. Therefore, the lower deck can have lengths and widths of various sizes to accommodate different upper deck sizes that may be found in house boats, pontoon boats, tritoon boats and any other multihull watercraft or dock.
As shown in the drawings, the bow end of the lower deck and its amidships pontoons are relatively flush with the bow end of the upper deck and the abeam pontoons, respectively, when they are in their retracted positions. However, it will be appreciated that the retracted positions of the lower deck or its amidships pontoons may be slightly recessed from the upper deck and its abeam pontoons. Alternatively, the retracted positions of the lower deck or the amidships pontoons may be slightly extended from the upper deck and the abeam pontoons. The recessed lower deck and pontoon arrangement may be particularly beneficial for permanent docks where owners must comply code restrictions and association restrictions for the size of floating docks and even permanent ground-supported docks, such as the pier dock described above. The slightly extended lower deck and pontoon arrangement could be as much as approximately six inches or more and may be beneficial to improve maneuverability and turning radius of a watercraft.
When the lower deck is in the extended position, the lower deck is elevated above the surface of the water from about 10 to 20 inches. When the lower deck is used, the user is less likely to be splashed by waves. Further, because of the longitudinal buoyancy provided by the amidships pontoons, the lower deck is extremely stable and safe.
Details of the guide rail 40 and lower deck 50 are illustrated in
The bottom side of the lower deck frame 52 is preferably welded or bolted to brackets 66 on their top sides, and the brackets are also attached to the amidships pontoons 60, preferably with welds or bolts. In addition to the side beams 52a and crossbeams 52b extending between the side beams, the lower deck frame 52 also includes mounting brackets 52d attached to each one of the side beams 52a at the aft end of the frame and may also include a stern center beam and a bow center beam for additional support. Upper and lower roller bearing assemblies 42 are secured to the mounting brackets 52d at their roller bearing mounting section 52d′ that projects aft of the side beams. Since these aft roller bearings 42″ are attached to the frame's side beams 52a, the aft roller bearings move with the lower deck relative to the main deck as the lower deck is extended and retracted. The mounting brackets have a side beam connection section 52d″ that is perpendicular to the roller bearing mounting section 52d′ and projects outwardly with the frame's flanges. The side beam connection section 52d″ is attached to and extends between the frame's flanges and at least partially closes off the aft end of the frame. The aft rollers 42″ engage the inner flanges of the inwardly facing c-channels or their channel inserts. The side beam connection section 52d″ in each of the mounting brackets engages the front roller bearings 42′ when the secondary deck is in the fully extended position and serves as a stop mechanism 160 that limits the secondary deck's maximum range of travel to within the length (L) of the guide rails and prevents the secondary deck 50 from extending beyond and breaking away from the guide rails 40 and the actuator 150.
The fixed front roller bearings 42′ and the moving aft roller bearings 42″ allow the lower deck 50 and its hull 60 to freely extend and retract as they are attached together throughout their range of travel, between the stowed position 70 and the fully extended position 80. The lower deck 50 is connected to the upper deck 10 preferably through both the guide rail 40 and the actuator 150. The actuator preferably holds the lower deck in its stowed position 70 and in its fully extended position 80, and the hard stop 160 is available to prevent the lower deck from breaking its connections to the upper deck through the actuator and to the guide rails. The lower deck's frame 52 is permanently attached to the hull 60 through bolts, welds or other fasteners. Accordingly, there is no releasable friction fit between the lower deck and its hull which would allow the lower deck's frame to separate from the hull such as would be possible with a tapered channel that receives a side beam. With a permanently fastened lower deck frame, the present invention is able to accommodate a lower deck 50 with a laterally expandable deck surface 90 which would not be possible if a releasable friction fit were used between the lower deck and its one or more hulls 60.
The top side plane 56 of the lower deck's upper side has a deck floor board 54a bolted to the lower deck frame 52 and a flooring material 54b laid over the deck floor board. The deck floor board is preferably made from marine grade wood decking or may be formed from plastic or composite materials in one or more sections. The flooring material is preferably glued or epoxied to the deck floor board. As explained in further detail with respect to
The secondary deck 50 can have different types of expandable deck assemblies other than the foldable wings 90a as discussed above and shown in
A pair of side actuators 150 are preferably used in the monohull embodiments to maximize the size of the storage hold. Channels, indentations or other recesses 72 are formed in the monohull above the side flotation chambers 64 and below the lower deck 50 to allow the side actuators to extend past the stern end of the monohull toward the bow of the monohull. Even with a pair of pontoons, an under-deck storage hold could fit in the space between the pontoons. For example, if side actuators are used as shown in the embodiment of
As shown in
For the monohull embodiments, the frame 52 for the lower deck 50 could be similar to the frame 52′ of the pontoon pair embodiments in which the side beams 52a are connected to the hull by fasteners and brackets. Alternatively, the side beams 52a may actually be formed as a part of the monohull sides, preferably above the side flotation chambers 64 and the recesses 72 through which the side actuators extend. Accordingly, the lower deck frame 52 could be attached to the monohull sides with fasteners, or the monohull sides could actually serve as a part of the frame 52″ for the lower deck.
As illustrated in
According to the description of the embodiments above, it will be appreciated that the present invention provides several benefits over existing multihull vessels and floating docks. In particular, the present invention provides additional buoyancy that more than compensates for the increase in weight of the lower deck, the guides and the actuator system which increases the hauling capacity and gross vehicle weight of the multihull vessel. The present invention can also increase the maneuverability and stability of the multihull vessel as well as increase the useable deck space when the vessel is stationary. The present invention may also increase fuel economy of the vessel, especially when compared to a vessel with the same total useable deck space. When the invention is used with permanent dock structures, it increases the usable deck space.
The embodiments were chosen and described to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to persons who are skilled in the art. As various modifications could be made to the exemplary embodiments, as described above with reference to the corresponding illustrations, without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the foregoing description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative rather than limiting. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/102,122 filed on Dec. 10, 2013 and also claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/256,630 filed on Nov. 17, 2015, both of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3347201 | Szabo | Oct 1967 | A |
3659546 | Miklos | May 1972 | A |
3815541 | Hansen | Jun 1974 | A |
5061215 | Walls | Oct 1991 | A |
5975002 | Rieger | Nov 1999 | A |
6415733 | Hudson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6880480 | Clouse | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7182033 | Phillips | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7987803 | Cochran | Aug 2011 | B2 |
9302740 | O'Neal | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20070295264 | Fishburn | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20140041569 | Couch, III | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62256630 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14102122 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 15062085 | US |