The present invention relates generally to a munition designed to impact a target with low lethality. More particularly, the present invention relates to a less-lethal projectile having extended range capabilities.
There is a well established need to provide a munition, having a projectile which can impact a target with a low likelihood of inflicting a lethal blow. The need for such a munition can be seen in numerous situations such as military and police applications, self-defense and even animal control. A desirable, less-lethal munition would be able to impart a stopping or disabling force on the target.
The art includes numerous examples of various projectiles, which are designed to impact the target with a less lethal force. One type of shotgun round designed for less lethal applications includes substituting a conventional shot gun slug with a flexible deformable sack which may contain particulate matter. The sack is designed to deform upon impact with the target, imparting a blow without significant penetration. Examples of such less lethal rounds are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,202,562 and 6,283,037.
Other examples of less-lethal shot gun rounds include slugs manufactured from deformable materials, which deform or spread out upon impact, thereby reducing incidences of penetration upon impact. An example of such rounds are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,952,662 and 5,691,501. Additionally, other rounds include destructible slugs carrying fluid or other substances within. Recreational paint balls are an example of such destructible projectiles and which are shown for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,254,379 and 6,546,874.
Each of the projectiles of the prior art, which are designed to be less lethal, suffer from certain disadvantages. First, the projectile or slug itself is complicated and expensive to manufacture, as compared with traditional shot gun slugs. Second, many of the known, less-lethal rounds require use of specialized non-standard weapons. Lastly, most of the available shot gun rounds are not accurate over an extended range. This greatly reduces the effectiveness of the round.
It is, therefore, desirable to provide a less-lethal munition projectile which is easy to manufacture and provides effective, less-lethal impact over an extended range.
The present invention provides an extended range munition of low lethality. The munition includes a projectile having a generally cylindrical body with a forward end and a rearward end. The forward end includes an extending protruding member to increase the weight of the body at the forward end. The body is formed of a light weight low durometer non-metallic material which dissipates energy upon impact.
In a preferred embodiment the outer wall of the body may be dimpled. Also the rearward end of the body may include a hollow bore.
The present invention additionally provides a less-lethal shot gun round. The round includes a generally tubular hull having a forward end and an opposed rearward end. A base encloses the rearward end of the hull. A propellant is contained within the base. A wad is sealably positioned in the hull adjacent to rearward end. A projectile slug is carried in the hull. The slug is generally a cylindrical member, having an outer cylindrical wall. The slug further includes a solid head at a forward end of the cylindrical member, thereby increasing the weight of the slug at the forward end. The slug is formed of nonmetallic material having a durometer hardness less than conventional shot gun slug materials
The present invention directed to an extended range less-lethal munition projectile. The projectile of the present invention may be fired from various weapons. The type of weapon employed dictates the type of cartridge in which the projectile is placed. For simplicity of description the projectile will be described with respect to a shot gun slug. It may be appreciated, however, that the present invention is not limited thereto.
As is shown in
Base 12, which is generally formed of metallic material, preferably brass, is a cup shape member having an open upper end defining a base interior 20. Base interior 20 supports a propellant 22, which is generally an explosive charge. The base 12 also supports at a lower end 24 thereof a primer 26, which when struck, ignites the propellant. A wad 14 interposed between base 12 and hull 16 which sealably contains propellant 22 in compression sealing it from the hull. As shown herein by way of example, wad 14 is a generally disk shape, plastic member. However, as is well known in the art and as is shown further herein below, wad 14 may take various sizes, shapes and constructions, depending upon the application of the round. Hull 16 is an elongate, tubular member having an open end 30 adjacent base 12 and an opposed crimped, closed end 32. Hull 16 of the present invention is typically formed of a plastic material. However, as is well known in the art, other materials and constructions for hull 16 may also be employed. In accordance with the present invention, hull 16 is designed to support one or more non-lethal projectile shot gun slugs 40.
Referring more specifically to
As shown in
The less lethal shot gun slug of the present invention, while shaped to mimic a conventional lead shot gun slug of similar size, is formed of a material having low velocity and is resistant to target penetration upon impact. Preferably, the slug of the present invention may be formed from a plastic material or other natural or synthetic materials having a low hardness, such as rubber, foam or a wide variety of plastics.
It is contemplated that preferable results are obtained with materials having a durometer hardness, ranging from about between 20 and 90. With this construction and hardness of material, the plug 40 of the present invention will impact the target with low lethality and less incidences of penetration.
The present invention also contemplates modifying the outside cylindrical surface of slug 40.
Referring now to
Thus, the present invention provides an aerodynamic, extended range projectile of low lethality, which has a configuration which mimics a conventional slug of similar size, so that conventional weapons may be employed to fire the round.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
119357 | Hobbs | Sep 1871 | A |
3058420 | Tanner et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3062145 | Morgan et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3146712 | Eisinger et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3342134 | Stadler et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3650213 | Abbott et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3732821 | Royer | May 1973 | A |
3848350 | Seminiano | Nov 1974 | A |
3865038 | Barr | Feb 1975 | A |
3952662 | Greenlees | Apr 1976 | A |
4043267 | Hayashi | Aug 1977 | A |
4173930 | Faires, Jr. | Nov 1979 | A |
4391199 | Morin | Jul 1983 | A |
4471699 | Turco et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4546704 | Ballreich et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4593621 | Buchner | Jun 1986 | A |
4676169 | Maki | Jun 1987 | A |
4779535 | Maki | Oct 1988 | A |
4823702 | Woolsey | Apr 1989 | A |
4996924 | McClain | Mar 1991 | A |
5086703 | Klein | Feb 1992 | A |
5200573 | Blood | Apr 1993 | A |
5225628 | Heiny | Jul 1993 | A |
5259319 | Dravecky et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5343850 | Steer | Sep 1994 | A |
5353712 | Olson | Oct 1994 | A |
5361700 | Carbone | Nov 1994 | A |
5361701 | Stevens | Nov 1994 | A |
5479861 | Kinchin | Jan 1996 | A |
5565649 | Tougeron et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5691501 | Gilbert | Nov 1997 | A |
6041712 | Lyon | Mar 2000 | A |
6067909 | Knoster, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6164209 | Best et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6189454 | Hunt | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202562 | Brunn et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6240850 | Holler | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6283037 | Sclafani | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6527880 | Amick | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6546874 | Vasel et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6615739 | Gibson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6782828 | Widener | Aug 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2639104 | May 1990 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050155511 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |