Extended release dosage forms of propranolol hydrochloride

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8367111
  • Patent Number
    8,367,111
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 31, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 5, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A unit dosage form, such as a capsule or the like for delivering drugs into the body in a sustained release fashion similar to that produced by INDERAL® LA indicated for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, comprises two populations of propranolol-containing particles (beads, pellets, granules, etc.). Each bead population exhibits a pre-designed rapid release profile (i.e., substantially complete release within 60 minutes) or sustained release profile over a period of 24 hours. Such a cardiovascular drug delivery system is designed by combining immediate release (IR) beads and sustained release (SR) beads. SR beads may be obtained by membrane coating IR beads with a water-insoluble polymer such as ethylcellulose or a mixture of a water insoluble polymer and a water-soluble polymer such as hydroxypropylcellulose at a ratio of from about 65/35 to 95/5.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to extended release dosage forms of propranolol hydrochloride suitable for oral administration for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, exhibiting in vitro and in vivo release profiles matching that of INDERAL® LA (an extended release propranolol hydrochloride dosage form), and more particularly to extended release propranolol HCl capsules, 60, 80, 120, and 160 mg, comprising immediate release (IR) beads releasing the drug within 60 minutes and sustained release (SR) beads releasing the drug over 24 hours when dissolution tested by the United States Pharmacopoeia dissolution test method for propranolol hydrochloride extended release capsules.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Propranolol hydrochloride-containing non-pareil seeds (sugar spheres) require a coating of water insoluble ethylcellulose of less than 2% by weight to mimic the drug release profile of INDERAL® LA when applied from a 98/02 acetone/purified water solution. Due to extremely low spray time, a significant batch to batch variability in drug release profile can occur. There was thus a desire to minimize batch to batch variability in drug release profile. Batch to batch variability may be improved by incorporating a water soluble film forming agent in the ethylcellulose membrane such that a significantly higher coating level, less susceptible to batch to batch variation, would be desired to provide a drug release profile mimicking that of INDERAL® LA.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,138,475 to McAinsh et al. discloses controlled release oral formulation comprising coated spheroids of propranolol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, each spheroid coated with a mixture of 80 to 100% by weight of ethylcellulose, preferably having a viscosity of 50 cps at 20° C., 20 to 0% by weight of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and optionally up to 20% plasticizer based on the total weight of the membrane. These spheroids prior to membrane coating comprise 40 to 65% by weight propranolol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and 35 to 60% by weight of microcrystalline cellulose and are prepared by extrusion and spheronization. The ratio of ethylcellulose to hydroxypropylcellulose and coating thickness depend upon the desired controlled release characteristics.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,587,118 issued to Hsiao discloses a controlled release theophylline oral formulation comprising coated micropellets; each pellet is designed to release theophylline at an approximately constant rate. The pellet comprises a drug containing core, which is then coated with a mixture of about 90-70% by weight of ethylcellulose and about 10-30% by weight of hydroxypropyl cellulose. The ratio of ethylcellulose to hydroxypropylcellulose and coating thickness depend upon the desired control release characteristics.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,752,470 issued to Mehta teaches the art of making a controlled release indomethacin formulation comprising coated pellets of indomethacin; each pellet is designed to release indomethacin in both immediate and sustained release form. The pellet comprises a drug-containing core, which is then coated with a mixture of plasticized ethylcellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. The loaded pellets are preferably composed of 5-30% by weight of indomethacin and coated with 0.5-10% by weight of ethylcellulose and hydroxypropylcellulose or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, the ratio of ethylcellulose to hydroxypropylcellulose/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose depending upon the desired control release characteristics.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,957,745 issued to Jonsson et al. describes the art of making a controlled release formulation of a salt of metoprolol comprising a multitude of metoprolol cores prepared by layering the drug onto inert silicon dioxide beads, wherein the core is coated with a metoprolol permeable membrane of essentially ethylcellulose or a mixture of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and ethylcellulose, the ratio of ethylcellulose to hydroxypropyl methylcellulose depending upon the desired control release characteristics.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,133,974 issued to Paradissis et al. discloses a controlled release formulation comprising a mixture of approximately 0-50% immediate release particles containing a drug, an inert substrate, a binder coated with talc, and up to 100% of extended release particles comprising the immediate release particles coated with a dissolution modifying system containing plasticizers and a film forming agent. Optionally, a drug is included in the coating. Film forming agents include ethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and mixtures thereof.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,472,708 issued to Chen discloses the art of making a tablet which rapidly disintegrates in the aqueous environment of use, comprising a plurality of pellets embedded in the tablet comprising drug containing cores and a swelling agent having a dissolution rate controlling polymer membrane of a mixture of water-insoluble ethylcellulose and a water soluble film forming polymer, and a permeability reducing agent. The water-soluble polymer is selected from a group containing cellulose acetate phthalate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and polyvinylpyrrolidone, the polymer exhibiting greater solubility at alkaline pH's being preferred. The swelling agent has the property of increasing in volume on exposure to the aqueous environment of use, thus causing rapid release of the drug following bursting of the bead.


Propranolol [1-(isopropyl amino)-3-(1-naphthyloxy)-2-propanoyl] is a beta-adrenergic blocking agent and as such is a competitive inhibitor of the effects of catecholamines at beta-adrenergic receptor sites. The principal effect of propranolol is to reduce cardiac activity by diminishing or preventing beta-adrenergic stimulation. By reducing the rate and force of contraction of the heart, and decreasing the rate of conduction of impulses through the conducting system, the response of the heart to stress and exercise is reduced. These properties are used in the treatment of angina in an effort to reduce the oxygen consumption and increase the exercise tolerance of the heart. Propranolol is also used in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias to block adrenergic stimulation of cardiac pacemaker potentials. Propranolol is also beneficial in the long-term treatment of hypertension. Other uses of propranolol are in the treatment of migraine and anxiety.


Propranolol is normally administered as propranolol hydrochloride tablets or as long acting INDERAL® LA.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a sustained release multi-particulate dosage form comprising a two-bead population of propranolol hydrochloride—one IR (immediate release) bead and the other SR (sustained release) bead. Alternatively, the dosage form may comprise only SR beads. The IR bead population, comprising in one embodiment an inert core coated with one or more layers of propranolol HCl and a binder, rapidly releases the active upon oral administration while the SR bead population comprises an IR bead population having a sustained release coating of a water insoluble polymer (e.g., ethylcellulose) or a combination of a water insoluble polymer and a water soluble polymer, such as hydroxypropylcellulose (e.g., HPC, Klucel LF) or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (e.g., HPMC, Methocel E5). The weight ratio of water insoluble polymer to water soluble polymer may vary from 100:0 to 65:35. The weight of the SR coating may vary from approximately 1 to 10%, preferably from about 1.5 to 4.0% based on the total weight of the coated beads, and most preferably the SR coating level is approximately 1.8 to 4.4 weight % based on the weight of the SR beads.


In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention unit dosage forms of extended release propranolol hydrochloride are provided that will release the drug into an aqueous environment in a fashion mimicking that of INDERAL® LA when tested under in vitro or in vivo conditions. It is an embodiment of the present invention to provide unit dosage forms such as hard gelatin capsules comprising two types of beads—one bead population (IR beads) comprising sugar spheres drug layered from an aqueous solution of propranolol hydrochloride with polyvinylpyrrolidone as the binder and a second bead population (SR beads) comprising an immediate release bead population having a sustained release membrane of approximately 1.5 to 6%, more particularly 1.8 to 4.4% by weight of a water insoluble polymer alone or in combination with a water soluble film forming polymer, wherein the ratio of IR beads to SR beads as well as the ratio of water insoluble polymer to water soluble polymer is optimized to obtain release profiles similar to that of INDERAL® LA, when both reference product and the long acting capsules of the present invention are tested by the United States Pharmacopoeia method for Propranolol Hydrochloride Extended Release Capsules. It is another embodiment of the present invention to provide unit dosage forms to be bioequivalent to INDERAL® LA when compared on an mg-by-mg basis. It is yet another embodiment of the present invention to provide physically and chemically stable dosage forms (i.e., exhibiting drug release profiles and degradation profiles statistically similar to that at the initial time point) when subjected to stability studies per ICH Guidelines. These and other embodiments, advantages and features of the present invention become clear when detailed description and examples are provided in subsequent sections.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates non-reproducibility in drug release profiles for commercial scale batches of extended release propranolol HCl Capsules (duplicate bead batches coated with an ethylcellulose membrane at 2.0%, 1.9%, and 1.8% based on the weight of the coated beads as described in Example 1).



FIG. 2 shows drug release profiles for Extended Release Propranolol HCl Capsule, 160 mg (80% SR beads/20% IR beads) as described in Example 2.



FIG. 3 illustrates drug release profiles for Extended Release Propranolol HCl Capsule, 160 mg (80% SR beads/20% IR beads) as described in Example 3.



FIG. 4 provides drug release profiles for Extended Release Propranolol HCl Capsules on stability at 40° C./75% RH as described in Example 4.



FIG. 5 shows drug release profiles for Extended Release Propranolol HCl Capsules on stability at 40° C./75% RH as described in Example 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

All documents cited are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention.


As used herein, the term “propranolol” includes the base, pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, stereoisomers thereof and mixtures thereof.


The active core of the dosage form of the present invention may be comprised of an inert particle or an acidic or alkaline buffer crystal, which is coated with a drug-containing film-forming formulation and preferably a water-soluble film forming composition to form a water-soluble/dispersible particle. The amount of drug in the core will depend on the drug, the dose, and the capsule size. Those skilled in the art will be able to select an appropriate amount of drug for coating onto the core to achieve the desired dosage. In one embodiment, the inert core may be a sugar sphere, cellulose sphere, silicon dioxide or a buffer crystal or an encapsulated buffer crystal such as calcium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, etc. which alters the microenvironment of the drug to facilitate its release.


The drug-containing particle may be coated with a water insoluble polymer or a combination of a water insoluble polymer and a water soluble polymer to provide SR beads. The water insoluble polymer and said water soluble polymer may be present at a weight ratio of from about 100/0 to 60/40 more particularly at a weight ratio of from about 95/5 to 65/35, preferably at a weight ratio of from 85/15 to 75/25. The membrane coating typically comprises from approximately 1% to 10%, preferably approximately 1.5 to 6%, most preferably approximately 1.8 to 4.4% by weight of the coated beads.


The unit dosage form according to one aspect of the present invention comprises two bead populations, one bead population, which provides an immediate release component of the active to act as a bolus dose and the other, a sustained release bead population, which releases propranolol over a period of 24 hours. In accordance with another embodiment, the dosage form comprises only SR beads.


The invention also provides a method of making a sustained release dosage form which comprises a mixture of two or more bead populations. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the method includes the steps of:

    • 1. coating an inert particle such as a non-pareil seed, an acidic buffer crystal or an alkaline buffer crystal with a drug and polymeric binder to form an active drug particle (IR beads), which may be present in the unit dosage form to act as a bolus dose;
    • 2. coating the active drug particle with a solution or suspension of a water insoluble polymer or a mixture of water soluble and water insoluble polymers to form a sustained release coated drug particle (SR beads);
    • 3. filling into a hard gelatin capsule SR beads and IR beads at a proper ratio ranging from 95/5 to 70/30 (SR beads/IR beads) to produce an extended release capsule exhibiting a drug release profile similar to that of INDERAL® LA when tested under identical conditions.


In accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention, the extended release capsule exhibits an in vitro dissolution profile substantially corresponding to the following pattern when tested according to United States Pharmacopoeia dissolution test method for Propranolol Hydrochloride Extended Release Capsules (USP Apparatus 1, Baskets @ 100 rpm, Drug Release Test 1 using 900 mL of pH 1.2 buffer for 1.5 hours followed by testing in 900 mL of pH 6.8 at 4, 8, 14, and 24 hours):

    • after 1.5 hours, not more than about 30% of the total propranolol is released;
    • after 4 hours, about 45±15%, preferably about 45±10%, of the total propranolol is released;
    • after 8 hours, about 65±15%, preferably about 65±10%, of the total propranolol is released;
    • after 14 hours, about 80±15%, preferably about 80±10%, of the total propranolol is released;
    • after 24 hours, not less than about 85% of the total propranolol is released.


An aqueous or a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent medium may be used for preparing drug containing core particles. The type of film forming binder that is used to bind the water-soluble drug to the inert sugar sphere is not critical but usually water-soluble, alcohol-soluble or acetone/water soluble binders are used. Binders such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene oxide, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), and polysaccharides, such as dextran and cornstarch, typically are used at concentrations of 0.5 to 10 weight % based on the coating formulation. The drug substance may be present in this coating formulation in the solution form or may be suspended at a solid content up to 35 weight % or lower, depending on the viscosity of the coating formulation.


The active containing cores (beads, pellets or granular particles) thus obtained may be coated with one or more layers of polymers to obtain desired release profiles. The membrane coating, which largely controls the rate of drug release by diffusion following imbibition of water or body fluids into the core, comprises a water insoluble polymer or a water insoluble polymer in combination with a water-soluble polymer. The water insoluble polymer is selected from the group which includes ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, and ammonio methacrylic acid copolymers sold under the trademarks EUDRAGIT RL and EUDRAGIT RS. The water-soluble polymer is selected from the group consisting of low viscosity (approximately 200 cps or less when tested as a 2% solution) HPMC, HPC, methylcellulose, polyethylene glycol (PEG of molecular weight>3000), and polyvinylpyrrolidone. The water insoluble polymer to water-soluble polymer ratio may typically vary 100/0 to 60/40, more particularly from 95/5 to 65/35, preferably from 85/15 to 75/25, at a thickness of from about 1% to 10%, preferably of approximately 1.5 to 6%, most preferably of approximately 1.8 to 4.4%, by weight of coated beads and depending on whether a polymer solution in an organic solvent or an aqueous polymer dispersion is used for membrane coating.


The membranes described herein may also include one or more plasticizers. Representative examples of plasticizers that may be used to plasticize the membranes include triacetin, tributyl citrate, triethyl citrate, acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate, diethyl phthalate, castor oil, dibutyl sebacate, acetylated monoglycerides and the like or mixtures thereof. The plasticizer may comprise about 3 to 30 wt. % and more typically about 10 to 25 wt. % based on the polymer.


In general, it is desirable to prime the surface of the active containing particle before applying the sustained release membrane coating by applying a thin hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) film. A particularly useful plasticized HPMC seal coat is OPADRY® Clear available from Colorcon. While HPMC is typically used, other primer or seal coats such as hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) can also be used.


The present invention relates to multi-dose forms, i.e., drug products in the form of multi-particulate dosage forms (pellets, beads, granules or mini-tablets) or in other forms suitable for oral administration.


The following non-limiting examples illustrate the capsule dosage forms manufactured in accordance with the invention, which exhibit in vitro drug release profiles, similar to that predicted by performing modeling exercises, and in vitro and plasma concentrations following circadian rhythm pharmacodynamic profile of angina attacks.


Example 1

Propranolol HCl (168 kg) was slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (8.8 kg Povidone K-30) and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (117.2 kg) were coated with the drug solution in a Glatt fluid bed granulator. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a seal coat of Opadry Clear (6.0 kg) was first applied. Duplicate batches of sustained release beads with a membrane coating with ethylcellulose having a viscosity of 10 cps at 25° C. at a thickness of 1.8%, 1.9% and 2.0% w/w (batch size: 275 kg) were manufactured. The SR coating was followed by the application of an Opadry Clear seal coating at 2% w/w. The SR beads prepared in accordance with Example 1 were filled into hard gelatin capsules and were characterized by the following properties:


Drug loading: 56% w/w based on core composition (corresponds to approximately 54% drug based on coated bead weight for bead batches having an SR coating of 1.8, 1.9, and 2.0%).


Drug Release Testing: The drug release profiles were generated by dissolution testing per US Pharmacopoeia method for Propranolol Hydrochloride Extended Release Capsules (USP Apparatus 1, Baskets @ 100 rpm, Drug Release Test 1 using 900 mL of pH 1.2 buffer for 1.5 hours followed by testing in 900 mL of pH 6.8 at 4, 8, 14, and 24 hours). The profiles obtained are shown in FIG. 1, which demonstrates potential batch to batch variability. Although ethylcellulose applied from a solvent solution provides less than ideal reproducibility, sustained release membranes containing ethylcellulose as described above are within the scope of the present invention.


Example 2

Propranolol HCl (168 kg) was slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (8.8 kg Povidone K-30) and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (117.2 kg) were coated with the drug solution in a Glatt fluid bed granulator. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a seal coat of Opadry Clear (6.0 kg) was first applied at a weight gain of 2% to form IR beads. Duplicate batches of sustained release beads were prepared by membrane coating IR beads (3750 g) with a sustained release coating comprising ethylcellulose (148 g) having a viscosity of 10 cps at 25° C. and hydroxypropylcellulose (Klucel LF; 47.3 g) having a viscosity of 75-150 cps when tested on a 5% aqueous solution at 25° C. (ratio of ethylcellulose to Klucel: 75/25) for a weight gain of approximately 5% w/w (batch size: 3947 g). The coated beads were cured at 60° C. for 4 hours. Propranolol Hydrochloride Extended Release Capsules, 160 mg, were produced by filling IR and SR Beads at a ratio of 20/80. The drug release from these capsules is presented in FIG. 2.


Example 3

Propranolol HCl (168 kg) was slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (8.8 kg Povidone K-30) and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (117.2 kg) were coated with the drug solution in a Glatt fluid bed granulator. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a seal coat of Opadry Clear (6.0 kg) was first applied to form IR beads. Duplicate batches of sustained release beads were prepared by membrane coating IR beads (3750 g) with ethylcellulose (152.5 g) having a viscosity of 10 cps at 25° C. and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (Methocel E5 from Dow Chemicals; 26.9 g) having a viscosity of 5 cps when tested on a 2% aqueous solution at 25° C. (ratio of ethylcellulose to Methocel E5: 85/15) for a weight gain of approximately 5% w/w (batch size: 3947 g). The coated beads were cured at 60° C. for 4 hours. Propranolol Hydrochloride Extended Release Capsules, 160 mg, were produced by filling IR and SR Beads at a ratio of 20/80. The drug release from these capsules is presented in FIG. 3.


Example 4

Ethylcellulose-Klucel based extended release capsules of Example 2 were packaged in induction sealed HDPE bottles and placed on accelerated stability (i.e., at 40° C./75% RH). The drug release profiles at 1, 2, 3, and 6-month stability time points are shown in FIG. 4. These dissolution data as well as the chemical stability data demonstrate that the product is stable.


Example 5

Ethylcellulose-HPMC based extended release capsules of Example 3 were packaged in induction sealed HDPE bottles and placed on accelerated stability (i.e., at 40° C./75% RH). The drug release profiles at 1, 2, 3, and 6-month stability time points are shown in FIG. 5. These dissolution data as well as the chemical stability data demonstrate that the product is stable.


Example 6

Propranolol HCl (168 kg) was slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (8.8 kg Povidone K-30) and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (117.2 kg) were coated with the drug solution in a Glatt fluid bed granulator. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a seal coat of OPADRY Clear (6.0 kg) was first applied to provide IR beads. IR beads (255.8 kg) were membrane coated with a sustained release coating comprising ethylcellulose (14.4 g) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (4.8 g) at a ratio of 75/25 for a weight gain of approximately 5% w/w (batch size: 275 kg). The coated beads were cured at 60° C. for 4 hours. Propranolol Hydrochloride Extended Release Capsules, 60, 80, 120, and 160 mg were produced by filling IR and SR Beads at a ratio of 20/80. The drug release from these capsules mimics that of INDERAL® LA.

Claims
  • 1. A pharmaceutical dosage form comprising sustained release (SR) beads and optionally immediate release (IR) beads, wherein: a. said IR beads comprise core particles comprising propranolol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and mixtures thereof; andb. said SR beads comprise core particles comprising propranolol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and mixtures thereof; and a membrane comprising a water insoluble polymer or a combination of a water insoluble polymer and a water soluble polymer,wherein said pharmaceutical dosage form when tested according to United States Pharmacopoeia dissolution test method USP Apparatus 1, Baskets @ 100 rpm, Drug Release Test 1 using 900 mL of pH 1.2 buffer for 1.5 hours followed by testing in 900 mL of pH 6.8 at 4, 8, 14, and 24 hours, exhibits the following dissolution profile:after 1.5 hours, not more than about 30% of the total propranolol is released;after 4 hours, about 45±15% of the total propranolol is released;after 8 hours, about 65±15% of the total propranolol is released;after 14 hours, about 80±15% of the total propranolol is released; andafter 24 hours, not less than about 85% of the total propranolol is released.
  • 2. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1 wherein said dissolution profile corresponds to the following pattern: after 1.5 hours, not more than about 30% of the total propranolol is released;after 4 hours, about 45±10% of the total propranolol is released;after 8 hours, about 65±10% of the total propranolol is released;after 14 hours, about 80±10% of the total propranolol is released; andafter 24 hours, not less than about 85% of the total propranolol is released.
  • 3. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1, wherein the immediate release (IR) beads and Sustained Release (SR) beads are present in a ratio of IR beads to SR beads of from about 0:100 to 30:70.
  • 4. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1, comprising said IR beads, wherein said IR beads release substantially all of the propranolol contained therein during the first hour of dissolution testing.
  • 5. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1 wherein said water insoluble polymer is selected from the group consisting of ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate, ammonio methacrylic acid copolymers, and mixtures thereof.
  • 6. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1, wherein said coating comprises a water insoluble polymer in combination with a water soluble polymer.
  • 7. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1 wherein said core particles comprise sugar spheres, cellulose spheres, silicone dioxide spheroids, acidic buffer crystals, or alkaline buffer crystals.
  • 8. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1, wherein said core particles further comprise a polymeric binder.
  • 9. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1 wherein said core particles further comprise a seal coating.
  • 10. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1 wherein said water soluble polymer is selected from the group consisting of hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, methylcellulose, polyethylene glycol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  • 11. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 6 wherein said water insoluble polymer and water soluble polymer are present in a weight ratio of from about 0:100 to 60:40.
  • 12. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1 wherein the membrane comprises about 1% to 10% based on the weight of said SR beads.
  • 13. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 5 wherein said water insoluble polymer comprises ethylcellulose having a viscosity of not more than 30 cps when tested on a 5% solution at 25° C.
  • 14. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1 wherein said dosage form contains a total of from about 60 mg to 160 mg propranolol or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
  • 15. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 6, wherein said water soluble polymer has a viscosity of not more than 200 cps when tested on a 2% aqueous solution at 25° C.
  • 16. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1, wherein said coating comprises approximately 1.5% to 6% based on the weight of the SR beads.
  • 17. A method of providing a patient with a sustained release delivery of propranolol comprising administering to said patient the pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 1.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 wherein said dosage form comprises a capsule.
  • 19. The pharmaceutical dosage form of claim 7, wherein said core particles of said IR beads comprise non-pareil seeds and a polymeric binder.
  • 20. A method of preparing a pharmaceutical dosage form, comprising the steps of: a. layering a solution comprising propranolol, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, or mixtures thereof, and a binder on inert particles to prepare immediate release (IR) beads;b. applying a sustained release coating, comprising a water insoluble polymer or a water insoluble polymer in combination with a water soluble polymer to the IR beads of step a, thereby forming sustained release (SR) beads; andc. filling capsules with SR beads of step b and optionally the IR beads of step a,wherein said filled capsules when tested according to United States Pharmacopoeia dissolution test method USP Apparatus 1, Baskets @ 100 rpm, Drug Release Test 1 using 900 mL of pH 1.2 buffer for 1.5 hours followed by testing in 900 mL of pH 6.8 at 4, 8, 14, and 24 hours, exhibit the following dissolution profile:after 1.5 hours, not more than about 30% of the total propranolol is released;after 4 hours, about 45±15% of the total propranolol is released;after 8 hours, about 65±15% of the total propranolol is released;after 14 hours, about 80±15% of the total propranolol is released; andafter 24 hours, not less than about 85% of the total propranolol is released.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, comprising the IR beads of step a, where said IR beads release substantially all of the propranolol contained therein within the first hour of dissolution testing.
  • 22. The method of claim 20 wherein step (a) further comprises: applying a protective seal coat to the IR beads.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein said filled capsules comprise the IR beads of step a and the SR beads of step b at a ratio of from about 5:95 to 30:70 (IR beads:SR beads).
  • 24. The method of claim 20, comprising the IR beads of step a, wherein the IR beads comprise beads, pellets, granules, or mini-tablets.
  • 25. The method of claim 20, comprising the IR beads of step a, wherein the IR beads comprise sugar spheres, cellulose spheres, silicone dioxide spheroids, acidic buffer crystals, or alkaline buffer crystals, coated with propranolol and a polymeric binder.
US Referenced Citations (215)
Number Name Date Kind
3184386 Stephenson May 1965 A
3558768 Klippel Jan 1971 A
3885026 Heinemann et al. May 1975 A
4078051 Pomot et al. Mar 1978 A
4138475 McAinsh et al. Feb 1979 A
4248857 DeNeale et al. Feb 1981 A
4292017 Doepel Sep 1981 A
4305502 Gregory et al. Dec 1981 A
4369172 Schor et al. Jan 1983 A
4371516 Gregory et al. Feb 1983 A
4389330 Tice et al. Jun 1983 A
4389393 Schor et al. Jun 1983 A
4542042 Samejima et al. Sep 1985 A
4556678 Hsiao Dec 1985 A
4587118 Hsiao May 1986 A
4628098 Nohara et al. Dec 1986 A
4661647 Serpelloni et al. Apr 1987 A
4670459 Sjoerdsma Jun 1987 A
4689333 Nohara et al. Aug 1987 A
4698101 Koivurinta Oct 1987 A
4708867 Hsiao Nov 1987 A
4713248 Kjornaes et al. Dec 1987 A
4716041 Kjornaes et al. Dec 1987 A
4728512 Mehta et al. Mar 1988 A
4743248 Bartoo et al. May 1988 A
4752470 Mehta Jun 1988 A
4757090 Salpekar et al. Jul 1988 A
4760093 Blank et al. Jul 1988 A
4780318 Appelgren et al. Oct 1988 A
4786508 Ghebre-Sellassie et al. Nov 1988 A
4800087 Mehta Jan 1989 A
4803213 Iida et al. Feb 1989 A
4824675 Wong et al. Apr 1989 A
4832880 Staniforth May 1989 A
4840799 Appelgren et al. Jun 1989 A
4851226 Julian et al. Jul 1989 A
4851229 Magruder et al. Jul 1989 A
4863742 Panoz et al. Sep 1989 A
4871549 Ueda et al. Oct 1989 A
4874613 Hsiao Oct 1989 A
4886669 Ventouras Dec 1989 A
4892741 Ohm et al. Jan 1990 A
4894240 Geoghegan et al. Jan 1990 A
4898737 Panoz et al. Feb 1990 A
4915949 Wong et al. Apr 1990 A
4938968 Mehta Jul 1990 A
4946684 Blank et al. Aug 1990 A
4957745 Jonsson et al. Sep 1990 A
4968508 Oren et al. Nov 1990 A
4971805 Kitanishi et al. Nov 1990 A
4983401 Eichel et al. Jan 1991 A
5006345 Lang Apr 1991 A
5011692 Fujioka et al. Apr 1991 A
5013557 Tai May 1991 A
5013743 Iwahi et al. May 1991 A
5017122 Staniforth May 1991 A
5017381 Maruyama et al. May 1991 A
5026559 Eichel et al. Jun 1991 A
5026560 Makino et al. Jun 1991 A
5039540 Ecanow Aug 1991 A
5045321 Makino et al. Sep 1991 A
5073374 McCarty Dec 1991 A
5075114 Roche Dec 1991 A
5079018 Ecanow Jan 1992 A
5082669 Shirai et al. Jan 1992 A
5084278 Mehta Jan 1992 A
5093132 Makino et al. Mar 1992 A
5104648 Denton et al. Apr 1992 A
5112616 McCarty May 1992 A
5133974 Paradissis et al. Jul 1992 A
5137733 Noda et al. Aug 1992 A
5149542 Valducci Sep 1992 A
5160680 Serpelloni et al. Nov 1992 A
5169640 France et al. Dec 1992 A
5178878 Wehling et al. Jan 1993 A
5204121 Bucheler et al. Apr 1993 A
5211957 Hagemann et al. May 1993 A
5213808 Bar-Shalom et al. May 1993 A
5229131 Amidon et al. Jul 1993 A
5229135 Philippon et al. Jul 1993 A
5238686 Eichel et al. Aug 1993 A
5252337 Powell Oct 1993 A
5256699 Murphy et al. Oct 1993 A
5260068 Chen Nov 1993 A
5260069 Chen Nov 1993 A
5275827 Spinelli et al. Jan 1994 A
5376384 Eichel et al. Dec 1994 A
5409711 Mapelli et al. Apr 1995 A
5433959 Makino et al. Jul 1995 A
5439689 Hendrickson et al. Aug 1995 A
5445829 Paradissis et al. Aug 1995 A
5464632 Cousin et al. Nov 1995 A
5466464 Masaki et al. Nov 1995 A
5470584 Hendrickson et al. Nov 1995 A
5472708 Chen Dec 1995 A
5478573 Eichel et al. Dec 1995 A
5489436 Hoy et al. Feb 1996 A
5501861 Makino et al. Mar 1996 A
5506345 Riley et al. Apr 1996 A
5508040 Chen Apr 1996 A
5529790 Eichel et al. Jun 1996 A
5536507 Abramowitz et al. Jul 1996 A
5567441 Chen Oct 1996 A
5576014 Mizumoto et al. Nov 1996 A
5609883 Valentine et al. Mar 1997 A
5612059 Cardinal et al. Mar 1997 A
5616345 Geoghegan et al. Apr 1997 A
5629017 Pozzi et al. May 1997 A
5639475 Bettman et al. Jun 1997 A
5643630 Hinzpeter et al. Jul 1997 A
5700492 Morimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5720974 Makino et al. Feb 1998 A
5738875 Yarwood et al. Apr 1998 A
5747068 Mendizabal May 1998 A
5762961 Roser et al. Jun 1998 A
5788987 Busetti et al. Aug 1998 A
5807577 Ouali Sep 1998 A
5837284 Mehta et al. Nov 1998 A
5837285 Nakamichi et al. Nov 1998 A
5837379 Chen et al. Nov 1998 A
5840329 Bai Nov 1998 A
5876759 Gowan, Jr. Mar 1999 A
5891474 Busetti et al. Apr 1999 A
5900252 Calanchi et al. May 1999 A
5908638 Huber et al. Jun 1999 A
5968554 Beiman et al. Oct 1999 A
6024981 Khankari et al. Feb 2000 A
6024982 Oshlack et al. Feb 2000 A
6033687 Heinicke et al. Mar 2000 A
6039979 Gendrot et al. Mar 2000 A
6096340 Chen et al. Aug 2000 A
6099859 Cheng et al. Aug 2000 A
6099863 Gilis et al. Aug 2000 A
6099865 Augello et al. Aug 2000 A
6103263 Lee et al. Aug 2000 A
6106861 Chaveau et al. Aug 2000 A
6106862 Chen et al. Aug 2000 A
6123962 Makino et al. Sep 2000 A
6129933 Oshlack et al. Oct 2000 A
6136345 Grimmett et al. Oct 2000 A
6139865 Friend et al. Oct 2000 A
6139877 Debregeas et al. Oct 2000 A
6153220 Cumming et al. Nov 2000 A
6162463 Lippa Dec 2000 A
6169105 Wong et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183776 Depui et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190692 Busetti et al. Feb 2001 B1
6221392 Khankari et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221402 Itoh et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228398 Devane et al. May 2001 B1
6269615 Amborn et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287599 Burnside et al. Sep 2001 B1
6316029 Jain et al. Nov 2001 B1
6328994 Shimizu et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344215 Bettman et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350470 Pather et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350471 Seth Feb 2002 B1
6365182 Khankari et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368625 Siebert et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368628 Seth Apr 2002 B1
6372253 Daggy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6391335 Pather et al. May 2002 B1
6413549 Green et al. Jul 2002 B2
6420473 Chittamuru et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432534 Hayakawa et al. Aug 2002 B1
6465009 Liu et al. Oct 2002 B1
6465010 Lagoviyer et al. Oct 2002 B1
6495160 Esposito et al. Dec 2002 B2
6500454 Percel et al. Dec 2002 B1
6509036 Pather et al. Jan 2003 B2
6531152 Lerner et al. Mar 2003 B1
6551617 Corbo et al. Apr 2003 B1
6579535 Valentine et al. Jun 2003 B2
6596311 Dobetti Jul 2003 B1
6602521 Ting et al. Aug 2003 B1
6627223 Percel et al. Sep 2003 B2
6641838 Pather et al. Nov 2003 B2
6660382 Nouri et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663888 Percel et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663893 Corbo et al. Dec 2003 B2
6740341 Holt et al. May 2004 B1
6897205 Beckert et al. May 2005 B2
7048945 Percel et al. May 2006 B2
20010007680 Kolter et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010014340 Ohta et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010046964 Percel et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020054907 Devane et al. May 2002 A1
20020077348 Dean et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020142034 Shimizu et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020187190 Cade et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030064108 Lukas et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030096791 Gupte et al. May 2003 A1
20030113374 Percel et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030134884 Hazama et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030157173 Percel et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030161888 Fernandez et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030215500 Ohta et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040047906 Percel et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040121010 Hirsh et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122106 Ohta et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040131682 Percel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040137156 Lee et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040242536 Khoo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050025824 Percel et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050118268 Percel et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050152974 Boehm et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050232988 Venkatesh et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050269722 De Luigi Bruschi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060057199 Venkatesh et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060078614 Venkatesh et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060105038 Lai et al. May 2006 A1
20060105039 Lai et al. May 2006 A1
20060246134 Venkatesh Nov 2006 A1
20060269607 Percel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20090263480 Lai et al. Oct 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (93)
Number Date Country
0052492 Feb 1984 EP
0166440 Jan 1986 EP
0239361 Sep 1987 EP
0349103 Jan 1990 EP
0357369 Mar 1990 EP
0391518 Oct 1990 EP
0431877 Jun 1991 EP
0516345 Dec 1992 EP
0538034 Apr 1993 EP
0553777 Aug 1993 EP
0650826 May 1995 EP
0721777 Jul 1996 EP
0815931 Jan 1998 EP
0294493 Dec 1998 EP
0914818 May 1999 EP
0914823 May 1999 EP
1010423 Jun 2000 EP
0582396 BI Jan 2001 EP
1070497 Jan 2001 EP
1072257 Jan 2001 EP
1157690 Nov 2001 EP
1156686 Mar 2003 EP
1366759 Dec 2003 EP
0914823 Dec 2004 EP
2319498 May 2011 EP
2679451 Jan 1993 FR
2766089 Jan 1999 FR
2778848 Nov 1999 FR
2053787 Feb 1981 GB
8824392.8 Sep 1989 GB
2224207 May 1990 GB
41-11273 Jun 1966 JP
49-69819 Jul 1974 JP
55-129224 Oct 1980 JP
56-014098 Oct 1981 JP
61-143316 Jul 1986 JP
62-50445 Oct 1987 JP
62-242616 Oct 1987 JP
62-246513 Oct 1987 JP
62-252723 Nov 1987 JP
63-162619 Jul 1988 JP
63-270624 Nov 1988 JP
1-503385 Nov 1989 JP
1-313420 Dec 1989 JP
2-500747 Mar 1990 JP
2-164824 Jun 1990 JP
2-172918 Jul 1990 JP
2-289512 Nov 1990 JP
3-240724 Oct 1991 JP
5-271054 Oct 1993 JP
5-310558 Nov 1993 JP
6-53658 Jul 1994 JP
6-321790 Nov 1994 JP
7-69889 Mar 1995 JP
7-124231 May 1995 JP
8-503482 Apr 1996 JP
8-175978 Jul 1996 JP
550608 Nov 2005 NZ
554346 May 2006 NZ
WO 8808703 Nov 1988 WO
WO 8808704 Nov 1988 WO
WO 9210173 Jun 1992 WO
WO 9300097 Jan 1993 WO
WO 9312769 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9313758 Jul 1993 WO
WO 9315724 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9408576 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9412180 Jun 1994 WO
WO 9741878 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9747287 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9904763 Feb 1999 WO
WO 0025752 May 2000 WO
WO 0033821 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0042998 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0051568 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0059486 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0113898 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0172285 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0180829 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0213794 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0243704 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02057475 Jul 2002 WO
WO 02085336 Oct 2002 WO
WO 03013492 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03039520 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03026613 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03041683 May 2003 WO
WO 03047552 Jun 2003 WO
WO 2004009058 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004022037 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004087111 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2005097064 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2005105049 Nov 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (53)
Entry
Yamahara et al, Effect of release rate on bioavailability of control-release multiple unit dosage forms, 1995, Yakuzaigaku, vol. 55 No. 2, 99-107.
Ishino, R et al., “Design and Preparation of Pulsatile Release Tablet as a New Oral Drug Delivery System,” Chem. Pharm. Bull., vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 3036-3041 (Nov. 1992).
Anwar, Y. et al., “Chronotherapeutics for Cardiovascular Disease,” Drugs, May 1998.
“Low Substituted Hydroxypropylcellulose,” Official Monographs for Part II, 2001, NRF, JP XIV, pp. 942-943.
Albrecht, “International Search Report,” 6 pages, from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US02/31535, European Patent Office (Feb. 3, 2003).
Bauer et al., Pharmarzeutische Technologie, 5th Edition, 1997, Govi Verlag Frankfurt, pp. 164-166.
Berigan, “Atomoxetine Used Adjunctively With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors to Treat Depression,” Prim. Care. Companion J. Clin. Psychiatry 6(2):93-94 (2004).
Bodmeier et al., “Theophylline Tablets Coated with Aqueous Latexes Containing Dispersed Pore Formers,” J. Pharm. Sci. 79(10):925-928 (1990).
Database WPI, Section Ch, Week 198748, Derwent Publications, Ltd., London, GB; Class A96; AN 1987-338131, XP002156870.
Fell, Letter to the Editor, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1968, vol. 20, pp. 657-658.
FMC Corporation Product Specification for Avicel PH, 2005.
Foreign non-patent publication from Japanese textbook, 1989, Hirokawa Publishing Co.
Foreign non-patent publication Sysmex No. FP30SCJ001.
Fubara, “International Preliminary Examination Report,” 3 pages, from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US02/31535, European Patent Office (Jun. 19, 2003).
Gordon et al., “Effect of the Mode of Super Disintegrant Incoproration on Dissolution in Wet Granulated Tables,” J. Pharm. Sci. 82:220-226 (1993).
Gorman et al., An Evaluation of Croscarmellose as a Tablet Disintegrant in Direct Compression Systems, Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1982; vol. 8, pp. 397-410.
Handbook (Binran) of Granule, vol. 1, Ohmsha Ltd., p. 434 & 438 (May 3, 1975).
Kaneto et al., 2000, Latest Pharmacy, Hirokawa Publishing Co., 1 Edition.
Kawashima, “Low-Substituted Hydroxypropylcellulose as a Sustained-Drug Release Matrix Base or Disintegrant Depending on Its Particle Size and Loading in Formulation,” Pharm. Res. 1993, vol. 10(3), pp. 351-355.
Kornblum, “A New Tablet Disintegrating Agent,” J. Pharm. Sci., Jan. 1973, vol. 62(1), pp. 43-49.
Kratochvil et al., “Atomoxetine: a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Exp. Opin. Pharmacother. 4(7):1165-1174 (2003).
McKenna et al., “Effect of particle size on the compaction mechanism and tensile strength of tablets,” J. Pharm. Pharmacol. Jun. 1982, vol. 34(6), pp. 347-351.
McKetta et al., “Table of Contents,” Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design (1989).
McKetta et al., Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, “Organic Phase Separation Conservation,” p. 167 (1989).
Mitsuo et al., Pharmaceutics Manual, 1989, Pharmaceutics Manual, Nanzando Co. Ltd.
Nwokole et al., “Tolerance during 29 days of conventional dosing with cimetidine, mizatidine, famotidine or ranitidine,” Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 4(Suppl. I):29-45 (1990) Abstract only.
Oh, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” 5 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, USA (mailed Aug. 24, 2007).
Ohira et al., “Effects of Various Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists on Gastrointestinal Motility and Gastric Emptying,” J. Smooth Muscle Res. 29:131-142 (1993).
Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic Version, 2006, Mannitol.
Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic Version, 2006, Lactose Monohydrate.
Pharmaceutical Excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic Version, 2006, Croscarmellose sodium.
Rankin, “International Search Report,” 6 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, European Patent Office (May 8, 2003).
Rudnic et al., “Some Effects of Relatively Low Levels of Eight Tablet Disintegrants on a Direct Compression System,” Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1981, vol. 7(3), pp. 347-358.
Rudnic et al., “Studies of the Utility of Cross Linked Polyvinlpolypyrrolidine as a Tablet Disintegrant,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 1980, vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 291-309.
Sato et al., “Anticonvulsant effects of tigabine, a new antiepileptic drug: the profile of action in the rat kindling model of epilepsy,” Epilepsia 37(Supp. 3):110-111 (1996).
Schifferer, “International Search Report,” 4 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, The Netherlands (mailed Jun. 1, 2006).
Schifferer, “Written Opinion of the International Search Authority,” 6 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/037084, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (mailed Jun. 1, 2006).
Shangraw et al., “A new era of tablet disintegrants,” Pharm. Technol. 1980, vol. 4(10), pp. 49-57.
Tirkkonen and Paronen, “Enhancement of drug release from ethylcellulose microcapsules using solid sodium chloride in the wall,” Int. J. Pharmaceutics 88;39-51 (1992).
Trottier and Wood, 2005, “Particle Size Measurement,” Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Extract of 1. Introduction; 2. Data Representation; 4. Measurement Methods; 8. Selection of Equipment).
Ueki et al., “Nizatidine Comparably Enhances Postprandial Gastric Motility to Existing Gastroprokinetics in Dogs,” Jpn. Pharmacol. Ther. 28(11):925-930 (2000).
Uhl, “International Search Report,” 5 pages, International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2006/016538, European Patent Office (Feb. 27, 2007).
Uhl, “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” 6 pages, International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2006/016538, European Patent Office (Feb. 27, 2007).
van Kamp et al., “Improvement by super disintegrants of the properties of tablets containing lactose, prepared by wet granulation,” Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition; 1983, vol. 5, pp. 165-171.
Villa, “International Search Report,” 4 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/038328, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, The Netherlands (mailed Sep. 15, 2006).
Villa, “Written Opinion of the International Search Authority,” 5 pages, from International Appl. No. PCT/US2005/038328, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany (mailed Sep. 15, 2006).
Vromans et al., “Studies on tableting properties of lactose,” Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition; 1985, vol. 7, pp. 186-193.
Yamamoto et al., “The Effects of Nizatidine on the Function of Esophageal Motility in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD),” Jpn. Pharmacol. Ther. 28(5):419-424 (2000).
Young, “International Preliminary Examination Report” 6 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Apr. 27, 2005).
Young, “Written Opinion,” 5 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US02/39238, United States Patent and Trademark Office (Jan. 13, 2005).
Zheng et al., “Influence of Eudragit® NE 30 D Blended with Eudragit® L 30 D-55 on the Release of Phenylpropanolamine Hydrochloride from Coated Pellets,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 29(3):357-366 (2003).
Zimmer, “European Search Report,” 3 pages, European patent appl. No. 01103129.1, European Patent Office (Jun. 9, 2001).
Zimmer, “International Search Report,” 4 pages, PCT International Application No. PCT/US01/04012, European Patent Office (Jun. 19, 2001).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040126427 A1 Jul 2004 US