Boreholes drilled into subterranean formations may enable recovery of desirable fluids (e.g., hydrocarbons) using a number of different techniques. A number of systems and techniques may be employed in subterranean operations to determine borehole and/or formation properties. For example, Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) along with a fiber optic system may be utilized together to determine borehole and/or formation properties. Distributed fiber optic sensing is a cost-effective method of obtaining real-time, high-resolution, highly accurate temperature and strain (acoustic) data along the entire wellbore. In examples, discrete sensors, e.g., for sensing pressure and temperature, may be deployed in conjunction with the fiber optic cable. Additionally, distributed fiber optic sensing may eliminate downhole electronic complexity by shifting all electro-optical complexity to the surface within the interrogator unit. Fiber optic cables may be permanently deployed in a wellbore via single- or dual-trip completion strings, behind casing, on tubing, or in pumped down installations; or temporally via coiled tubing slickline, or disposable cables.
Fiber optic cables are typically characterized by a constant gain/loss profile across the sensing fiber span. This implies that backscatter signals are similarly attenuated as a function of distance along the sensing fiber. Additionally, in dual trip and/or multi-zone completions, additional mechanisms utilized to attach the fiber optic cables to other devices or other fiber optic cables are required. For example, there may be optical wet-mate, dry-mate, and/or splice connections to provide optical continuity through otherwise piecewise continuous sensing fiber segments. These mechanisms introduce insertion loss to the fiber optic cables. Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) preferentially operates by having a continuous fiber. Points of insertion loss degrade the signal-to-noise from the point of insertion loss and below. This is a significant degradation in signal quality.
These drawings illustrate certain aspects of some examples of the present disclosure and should not be used to limit or define the disclosure.
The present disclosure relates generally to a system and method for using fiber optics in a DAS system in a subsea operation. Subsea operations may present optical challenges which may relate to the quality of the overall signal in the DAS system with a longer fiber optical cable. To improve signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), a configuration of enhanced backscatter fibers may be supplemented with gradient or step response in backscatter, such that the receiver backscatter signals are consistent across the sensing fiber span (with or without optical connectors).
Enhanced backscatter fibers are used to improve Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). However, they are able to degrade SNR if not managed appropriately. For example, signal fidelity loss via cross-talk increases may degrade sensing performance. In examples, the fiber optic cables may have a consistence backscatter response, so the signal levels from the start of fiber are similar to the signal levels at the end of fiber (or in other words, the received signal levels from the end of fiber are not sufficiently smaller—due to attenuation—than those at the start of fiber).
Additionally, dual trip and/or multi-zone completions may utilize optical wet-mate, dry-mate, and/or splice connections to provide optical continuity through otherwise piecewise continuous sensing fiber segments. These connectors all introduce insertion loss. DAS systems operate with a single set of controls (e.g., controlling the launch signal strength, receive EDA gains, etc.). Having loss profiles along a completion implies DAS data quality is degraded. Enhanced backscatter fibers (EBFs) have been introduced for DAS. The EBFs are processed to have a gain (i.e., backscatter coefficient higher than native Rayleigh backscatter coefficient for a normal fiber) that improves DAS SNR. The gain can be specified during fiber manufacturing.
The EBF elements of each zone may be specified so as to compensate for the insertion losses of any connector prior to the EBF element. For example, the first EFM element has a gain of 10 dB, and is optically coupled via a 1 dB (two-way loss) wet-mate connector to a second EBF element with a gain of 11 dB, which is optically coupled to a 1 dB (two-way) wet-mate connector to a third EBF element with a gain of 13 dB. This way, the gain profile of the EBF offsets insertion losses of the connectors. Moreover, the gain profile of the EBF segments need not be linear, but may (linearly or exponentially) increase with distance to offset attenuation along the EBF segment, thus providing uniform measurement sensitivity along the fiber optic cable.
A wellbore 122 extends through the various earth strata toward the subterranean hydrocarbon bearing formation 104 and tubular 120 may be extended within wellbore 122. Even though
Fiber optic cable 128 may be permanently deployed in a wellbore via single- or dual-trip completion strings, behind casing, on tubing, or in pumped down installations. In examples, fiber optic cable 128 may be temporarily deployed via coiled tubing, wireline, slickline, or disposable cables.
Additionally, within DAS system 150, interrogator 124 may be connected to an information handling system 130 through connection 132, which may be wired and/or wireless. It should be noted that both information handling system 130 and interrogator 124 are disposed on floating vessel 102. Both systems and methods of the present disclosure may be implemented, at least in part, with information handling system 130. Information handling system 130 may comprise any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, estimate, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, switch, store, display, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, an information handling system 130 may be a processing unit 134, a network storage device, or any other suitable device and may vary in size, shape, performance, functionality, and price. Information handling system 130 may comprise random access memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types of nonvolatile memory. Additional components of the information handling system 130 may comprise one or more disk drives, one or more network ports for communication with external devices as well as an input device 136 (e.g., keyboard, mouse, etc.) and video display 138. Information handling system 130 may also comprise one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
Alternatively, systems and methods of the present disclosure may be implemented, at least in part, with non-transitory computer-readable media 140. Non-transitory computer-readable media 140 may comprise any instrumentality or aggregation of instrumentalities that may retain data and/or instructions for a period of time. Non-transitory computer-readable media 140 may comprise, for example, storage media such as a direct access storage device (e.g., a hard disk drive or floppy disk drive), a sequential access storage device (e.g., a tape disk drive), compact disk, CD-ROM, DVD, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), and/or flash memory; as well as communications media such as wires, optical fibers, microwaves, radio waves, and other electromagnetic and/or optical carriers; and/or any combination of the foregoing.
Production operations and sensing operations in a subsea environment present optical challenges for DAS system 150. For example, pulse repetition rate that may be used in DAS system 150 is inversely proportional to fiber length. Additionally, the signal strength decays with distance due to attenuation so the signal strength is approximately inversely proportional with distance. Moreover, the maximum light pulse power that can be launched into the sensing fiber prior to the occurrence of optical nonlinearities such as modulation instability is inversely proportional to the total fiber length, meaning that less light pulse power can be injected in sensing fibers with longer lengths.
Therefore, the quality of the overall signal is poorer with a longer fiber than a shorter fiber. This may impact any operation that may utilize DAS system 150 since the distal end of the fiber contains the interval of interest (i.e., the reservoir) in which fiber optic cable 128 may be deployed. The interval of interest may comprise wellbore 122 and formation 104. For pulsed DAS systems 150 such as the one exemplified in
As illustrated in
In examples, fiber optic cables 128 may house one or several optical fibers and the optical fibers may be single mode fibers, multi-mode fibers or a combination of single mode and multi-mode optical fibers. One or more of the optical fibers deployed in the sensing region of interest may be an optically enhanced fiber with increased Rayleigh backscattering characteristics when compared to normal single mode optical fibers. The increased Rayleigh backscattering characteristics may be due to perturbations of the refractive index in the optical fiber. The fiber optic sensing systems connected to the optical fibers may comprise Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) systems, Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) Systems, Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) Systems, quasi-distributed sensing systems where multiple single point sensors are distributed along an optical fiber/cable, or single point sensing systems where the sensors are located at the end of the cable.
During operations, fiber optic sensing systems may operate using various sensing principles like Rayleigh scattering, Brillouin scattering, Raman scattering, and/or the like. Raman scattering may comprise, but is not limited to, amplitude-based sensing systems like DTS systems. Phase sensing-based systems like DAS systems 150 (e.g., referring to
True Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing (DFOS) systems may operate based on Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (OTDR) principles or Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry (OFDR). OTDR based systems may be pulsed where one or more optical pulses may be transmitted down an optical fiber and backscattered light (Rayleigh, Brillouin, Raman etc.) is measured and processed. Time of flight for the optical pulse(s) indicate where along the optical fiber the measurement is done. OFDR based systems operate in continuous wave (CW) mode where a tunable laser is swept across a wavelength range, and the back scattered light is collected and processed.
Fiber optic cables 128 may further comprise various hybrid approaches where single point or quasi-distributed or distributed fiber optic sensors are mixed with electrical sensors. Therefore, fiber optic cable 128 may then comprise optical fiber and electrical conductors. Electrical sensors may be pressure sensors based on quarts type sensors or strain gauge-based sensors or other commonly used sensing technologies. Pressure sensors, optical or electrical, may be housed in dedicated gauge mandrels or attached outside the casing in various configurations for down-hole deployment or deployed conventionally at the surface well head or flow lines.
Temperature measurements from a DTS system may be used to determine locations for water injection applications where fluid inflow in the treatment well as well as the fluids from the surface are likely to be cooler than formation temperatures. During operations, a DTS warm-back analysis may be utilized to determine fluid volume placement, this is often done for water injection wells and the same technique may be used for fracturing fluid placement. Temperature measurements in observation wells may be used to determine fluid communication between the treatment well and observation well, or to determine formation fluid movement.
DAS data may be used to determine fluid allocation in real-time as acoustic noise is generated when fluid flows through the casing and in through perforations into the formation. Phase and intensity based interferometric sensing systems may be sensitive to temperature and mechanical as well as acoustically induced vibrations. DAS data may be converted from time series data to frequency domain data using Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) and other transforms like wavelet transforms may also be used to generate different representations of the data. Various frequency ranges may be used for different purposes. In examples, low frequency signal changes may be attributed to formation strain changes or temperature changes due to fluid movement and other frequency ranges may be indicative of fluid or gas movement. Various filtering techniques and models may be applied to generate indicators of events that may be of interest. Indicators may comprise formation movement due to growing natural fractures, formation stress changes during the fracturing operations and this effect may also be called stress shadowing. During operations, fluid seepage may be sensed by fiber optic cables during a fracturing operation as formation movement may force fluid into and observation well. This may comprise, but is not limited to, fluid flow from fractures, and/or fluid and proppant flow from frac hits. Each indicator may have a characteristic signature in terms of frequency content and/or amplitude and/or time dependent behavior, and these indicators may be. These indicators may also be present at other data types and not limited to DAS data. Fiber optic cables used with DAS systems may comprise enhanced back scatter optical fibers where the Rayleigh backscatter may be increased by 10× or more with associated increase in Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR).
DAS systems 150 (e.g., referring to
DSS data may be generated using various approaches and static strain data may be used to determine absolute strain changes over time. Static strain data is often measured using Brillouin based systems or quasi-distributed strain data from FBG based system. Static strain may also be used to determine propped fracture volume by looking at deviations in strain data from a measured strain baseline before fracturing a stage. It may also be possible to determine formation properties like permeability, poroelastic responses and leak off rates based on the change of strain vs time and the rate at which the strain changes over time. Dynamic strain data may be used in real-time to detect fracture growth through an appropriate inversion model, and appropriate actions like dynamic changes to fluid flow rates in the treatment well, addition of diverters or chemicals into the fracturing fluid or changes to proppant concentrations or types may then be used to mitigate detrimental effects.
Fiber Bragg Grating based systems may also be used for a number of different measurements. FBG's are partial reflectors that may be used as temperature and strain sensors or may be used to make various interferometric sensors with very high sensitivity. FBG's may be used to make point sensors or quasi-distributed sensors where these FBG based sensors may be used independently or with other types of fiber optic-based sensors. FBG's may manufactured into an optical fiber at a specific wavelength, and other system like DAS, DSS or DTS systems may operate at different wavelengths in the same fiber and measure different parameters simultaneously as the FBG based systems using Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) and/or Time Division Multiplexing (TDM).
The sensors may be placed in either the treatment well or monitoring well(s) to measure well communication. The treatment well pressure, rate, proppant concentration, diverters, fluids and chemicals may be altered to change the hydraulic fracturing treatment. These changes (i.e., stress fields change) may impact the formation responses in several different ways and this may generate micro seismic effects that may be measured with DAS systems and/or single point seismic sensors like geophones. These sensors may allow for measuring fracture growth rates as they change and this may generate changes in measured micro seismic events and event distributions over time, or changes in measured strain using the low frequency portion or the DAS signal or Brillouin based sensing systems. Pressure changes due to poroelastic effects may be measured in the monitoring well and pressure data may be measured in the treatment well and correlated to formation responses. Thus, various changes in treatment rates and pressure may generate events that may be correlated to fracture growth rates.
Several measurements may be combined to determine adjacent well communication, and this information may be used to change the hydraulic fracturing treatment schedule to generate outcomes. Multiple wells in a field and/or reservoir may be instrumented with optical fibers for monitoring subsurface reservoirs from cradle to grave. Subsurface applications may comprise hydrocarbon extraction, geothermal energy production and/or fluid injection like water or CO2 in CCUS application.
As illustrated in
DAS system 150 may comprise an interferometer 202. Without limitations, interferometer 202 may comprise a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. For example, a Michelson interferometer or any other type of interferometer 202 may also be used without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Interferometer 202 may comprise a top interferometer arm 224, a bottom interferometer arm 222, and a gauge 223 positioned on bottom interferometer arm 222. Interferometer 202 may be coupled to first coupler 210 through a second coupler 208 and an optical fiber 232. Interferometer 202 further may be coupled to a photodetector assembly 220 of DAS system 150 through a third coupler 234 opposite second coupler 208. Second coupler 208 and third coupler 234 may be a traditional fused type fiber optic splitter, a PLC fiber optic splitter, or any other type of optical splitter known to those with ordinary skill in the art. Photodetector assembly 220 may comprise associated optics and signal processing electronics (not shown). Photodetector assembly 220 may be a semiconductor electronic device that uses the photoelectric effect to convert light to electricity. Photodetector assembly 220 may be an avalanche photodiode or a pin photodiode but is not intended to be limited to such.
When operating DAS system 150, pulse generator 214 may generate a first optical pulse 216 which is transmitted through optical fiber 212 to first coupler 210. First coupler 210 may direct first optical pulse 216 through a fiber optic cable 128. It should be noted that fiber optic cable 128 may be comprised in umbilical line 126 and/or fiber optic cable 128 (e.g.,
where n is the refractive index, p is the photoelastic coefficient of fiber optic cable 128, k is the Boltzmann constant, and β is the isothermal compressibility. Tf is a fictive temperature, representing the temperature at which the density fluctuations are “frozen” in the material. Fiber optic cable 128 may be terminated with a low reflection device (not shown). In examples, the low reflection device (not shown) may be a fiber coiled and tightly bent to violate Snell's law of total internal reflection such that all the remaining energy is sent out of fiber optic cable 128, via macrobending.
Backscattered light 228 may travel back through fiber optic cable 128, until it reaches second coupler 208. First coupler 210 may be coupled to second coupler 208 on one side by optical fiber 232 such that backscattered light 228 may pass from first coupler 210 to second coupler 208 through optical fiber 232. Second coupler 208 may split backscattered light 228 based on the number of interferometer arms so that one portion of any backscattered light 228 passing through interferometer 202 travels through top interferometer arm 224 and another portion travels through bottom interferometer arm 222. Therefore, second coupler 208 may split the backscattered light from optical fiber 232 into a first backscattered pulse and a second backscattered pulse. The first backscattered pulse may be sent into top interferometer arm 224. The second backscattered pulse may be sent into bottom interferometer arm 222. These two portions may be re-combined at third coupler 234, after they have exited interferometer 202, to form an interferometric signal.
Interferometer 202 may facilitate the generation of the interferometric signal through the relative phase shift variations between the light pulses in top interferometer arm 224 and bottom interferometer arm 222. Specifically, gauge 223 may cause the length of bottom interferometer arm 222 to be longer than the length of top interferometer arm 224. With different lengths between the two arms of interferometer 202, the interferometric signal may comprise backscattered light from two positions along fiber optic cable 128 such that a phase shift of backscattered light between the two different points along fiber optic cable 128 may be identified in the interferometric signal. The distance between those points L may be half the length of the gauge 223 in the case of a Mach-Zehnder configuration, or equal to the gauge length in a Michelson interferometer configuration.
While DAS system 150 is running, the interferometric signal will typically vary over time. The variations in the interferometric signal may identify strains in fiber optic cable 128 that may be caused, for example, by seismic energy. By using the time of flight for first optical pulse 216, the location of the strain along fiber optic cable 128 and the time at which it occurred may be determined. If fiber optic cable 128 is positioned within a wellbore, the locations of the strains in fiber optic cable 128 may be correlated with depths in the formation in order to associate the seismic energy with locations in the formation and wellbore.
To facilitate the identification of strains in fiber optic cable 128, the interferometric signal may reach photodetector assembly 220, where it may be converted to an electrical signal. The photodetector assembly may provide an electric signal proportional to the square of the sum of the two electric fields from the two arms of the interferometer. This signal is proportional to:
P(t)=P1+P2+2*Sqrt(P1P2)cos(ϕ1ϕ2) (2)
where Pn is the power incident to the photodetector from a particular arm (1 or 2) and ϕn is the phase of the light from the particular arm of the interferometer. Photodetector assembly 220 may transmit the electrical signal to information handling system 130, which may process the electrical signal to identify strains within fiber optic cable 128 and/or convey the data to a display and/or store it in computer-readable media. Photodetector assembly 220 and information handling system 130 may be communicatively and/or mechanically coupled. Information handling system 130 may also be communicatively or mechanically coupled to pulse generator 214.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to
In examples, DAS system 150 may generate interferometric signals for analysis by the information handling system 130 without the use of a physical interferometer. For instance, DAS system 150 may direct backscattered light to photodetector assembly 220 without first passing it through any interferometer, such as interferometer 202 of
Fiber optic cables 128 (e.g., referring to
The maximum signal power that may be launched into an optical fiber may be limited by the optical source, and this may sometimes be overcome by using optical amplifiers like Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers (EDFAs), where the signal amplitude is increased. EDFAs are opto-electric devices with power supplies, electronics and specialty optics packaged into bench-top enclosures, or rack mount enclosures or miniaturized so that they may be comprised in as sub-components of other electrical systems.
Other limitations of the maximum signal power may comprise thermal damage to connectors or other optical components commonly used in routing optical signals. Free-space optics and lenses are used to build micro-optic components like optical isolators, Wavelength Division Multiplexers (WDMs), filters, circulators, and/or the like, which may be used to route signals in a directional fashion. Any point in the system where the optical signal exits/enters the optical fiber may be a point of concern where thermal damage due to high optical power levels may occur.
Yet other limitations comprise non-linear fiber transmission penalties like Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS), Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS), Kerr-effect related phenomena like Self-Phase Modulation (SPM), Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM), modulation instability, soliton formation or Four Wave Mixing (FWM). The non-linear effects may be influenced by a number of parameters such as fiber dispersion, fiber effective area, channel spacing in WDM systems, signal intensity and source line width.
The noise floor and system SNR may in many instances be limited by interrogator system design, photo detector noise, optical component losses, and/or the like. The use of EDFAs must also be considered and optimized as both signal and noise are amplified, and small signal gain is typically higher than large signal gain. Optical component losses prior to the gain element in the EDFA may also decrease the signal to noise. As a device, EDFA's are characterized by Noise Figure (NF) which is a measure of the degradation of the SNR. For example, if the signal is amplified the noise may be amplified even more and the losses prior to the gain element may reduce the signal amplitude so the actual SNR may be reduced.
Another challenge with pulsed sensing systems like Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS), Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) systems is that only one signal at a given wavelength may propagate through the sensing region of the sensing fiber at any given time in order to prevent back-scattered light from multiple locations along the sensing fiber from returning to the respective distributed sensing systems at the same time. This limits the pulse repetition rate in optical systems, which in turn limits the frequency content of signals as well as the amount of averaging of signals that may be done for any given time period.
Light pulses are launched into the 4.5 km sensing region 500 and 23 km sensing region 500 of sensing fiber 710 every 50 μs and 250 μs, respectively, ensuring that at any time only one light pulse is contained within sensing fiber 710 and/or fiber optic cable 128 (e.g., referring to
Methods and system discussed below overcome and actively mitigate issues faced over longer fiber optic cables 128 (e.g., referring to
To overcome issues faced by longer fiber optic cables 128 (e.g., referring to
Receivers 902 or receiver assemblies may be an opto-electric device that converts photons/optical light into electrons/electric signal with suitable optical and electrical amplification and filtering. Examples of optical to electrical conversion devices comprise various photo diodes, avalanche photodiodes, photo-multiplier tubes/assemblies etc. Optical amplification may comprise of EDFA's and SOA's, optical filtering may comprise of WDM's and ASE filters, electrical amplification would be done using various low noise amplifiers and may comprise hardwired filtering to eliminate out of band signals, followed by additional signal processing and filtering once in the electrical/digital domain.
Further
A signal strength monitoring module 1700 may function as an optical power meter of the backscattered light signals at the light frequencies utilized by DAS and DTS over distance. It may employ a number of opto-electronic components such as e.g., square-law photodetectors (to convert the back-scattered light into an electrical signal proportional to optical power), optical shutters (to restrict the measurement to certain portions of the transmission fiber e.g., close to WDM 1300), high speed digitizers (to sample the back-scattered light at a sufficiently high spatial sampling interval), etc.
For example, the signal strength monitoring module 1700 may be a photodiode or other similar opto-electric device where the optical energy may be converted to an electrical signal where the signal intensity, current or voltage is a measure of signal strength. Optional implementations comprise WDM's where individual optical wavelengths are separated in the optical domain and routed to individual wavelength dedicated opto-electric converters. Signal tap couplers 1704 may be used to enable signal strength monitoring of transmitted pulses from the sensing systems, back scattered light from transmission fiber 706 and return signals on return fiber 708. Signal strength monitoring modules may be calibrated over wavelength and/or optical power.
Raman pump 1100/1500 may use an internal photodiode for output power monitoring, and this internal photo diode signal strength may be calibrated with pump laser power in order to enable control of individual pump lasers. This enables operation of individual pump laser wavelengths and thus enables gain shape control of a multi-wavelength DRA system. Individual signal wavelength strengths may then be measured with a signal strength monitoring module 1700 and individual Raman pump laser powers may be adjusted for a controlled Raman gain shape and optimum system level signal to noise properties when combined with individual signal laser power controls. In one example, determining the power of a Raman pump module may be to use a drive current as a measure of output power where a calibration may be performed during manufacturing where laser output power is measured as a function of laser drive current. Additional probe lasers may be comprised in the signal strength monitoring modules 1700 where probe lasers may be used to setup gain profiles and gain levels at specific wavelengths. Probe lasers may be optically connected (i.e., using optical couplers or WDMs) in close proximity of the signal strength monitoring where the probe lasers are used transmit a probe signal into the fiber used for DRA. The probe lasers may be at a wavelength substantially similar to the signal laser wavelength(s) or may be located at pre-determined wavelengths in close proximity to the signal laser wavelengths.
Transmitted signal pulse power that is too high for DAS system 150 causes non-linear penalties, thus the signal pulse power may be lowered to stay just below non-linear penalty levels. Additionally, too much Raman gain may amplify the signal which may provide a high signal pulse power and associated nonlinear effects. Signal strength monitoring module 1700 may be able to measure the backscattered Rayleigh signal strength over distance and may allow for optimizing DAS system 150 by adjusting the transmitted signal pulse power from transmitter 900 and/or Brillouin DTS transmitter 1002 and the Raman pump 1100 power to have the highest possible signal pulse power to reach downhole sensing fiber 710. Thus, this optimization maximizes signal pulse power from transmitter 900 and/or Brillouin DTS transmitter 1002 at the distal end of transmission fiber 706.
To perform this optimization in return fiber 708, the optimization looks at the amplification of the backscattered signal returning back to receiver 902 and/or Brillouin DTS receiver 1004 by changing the Raman pump 1500 power to a maximum level in order to get the best possible OSNR for both the DAS and BDTS systems
Optimizing signal strength and gain levels may be performed by implementing monitoring elements. For example, an upper signal strength monitoring module 1700 may be used to monitor signal levels on the transmitted pulses as well as back scattered Rayleigh light as the transmitted pulses travel down transmission fiber 706. Signal strength monitoring module 1700 may monitor signal levels by connecting to transmission fiber 706 through signal tap coupler 1704. Signal tap coupler 1704 may be a fused fiber device where a small portion of the optical signal is diverted from the main optical path. For example, 95-99% of the optical signal may pass from fused fiber WDM 1300 through signal tap coupler 1704 to micro-optic WDM 1000 and the remaining 1-5% may be diverted to signal strength monitoring modules 1700/1702. Reviewing the signal levels allow a user to determine if the path is optimized or may need to be adjusted, as discussed above. Signal tap coupler 1704 may be made with any pass thru/tap ratio, and the numbers above are general guidelines as other split rations and devices may be used to achieve similar functions.
The Raman pump power and individual pump laser powers may then be adjusted to keep the transmitted pulse power within an amplitude band such that the downward propagating signal is kept within limits to minimize non-linear signal degradation and optimize signal strength in downhole sensing fiber 710. Lower signal strength monitoring module 1702 may be used to monitor the return signal strength. As illustrated, lower signal strength monitoring module 1702 may connect to return fiber 708 through signal tap coupler 1704. Raman pump power may be adjusted to keep the back-scattered light within an amplitude band so that the return signal may be amplified for optimum signal strength while avoiding damage to optical components in the system. An optional signal source may be added into this block in order to provide a probe signal that may be pulsed on demand in order to measure the back scattered Rayleigh signal strength along fiber optic cable 128 in order to determine the Raman gain along fiber optic cable 128. This architecture may then be used to monitor signal strength levels across DAS system 150 in real-time. Additional signal processing may also be done on the detected signal and various quality metrics such that various power condition routines may be implemented, for example, periodically vary the transmitted signal strength and measure impact on signal quality or periodically vary the Raman pump power and measure impact on signal quality and/or the like.
Control Function 1800 operates and functions to provide feedback in a control loop to automatically adjust pump laser current based on a predetermined amplified signal return without under or over amplification. Raman pump power levels and transmitted sensing system pulse power may be controlled based on pre-determined limits and/or real-time feedback from calculated parameters such as system noise floor, optical signal to noise, signal distortion, non-linearity, and/or the like. This is effectively an Automatic Gain Control for stabilized return signal levels for optimized signal-to-noise ratio.
Additionally,
These sensors may affect the distributed gain with Raman amplification by propagating high optical power in the same fiber optic cable 128 as the signals selected for amplification. The Raman amplification happens over a 10's of km's of fiber length and the Raman pump wavelength may be spaced apart from the signal wavelength in the wavelength domain. The Raman gain peak is about 13 THz away from the pump laser at 1450 nm, which equals to around 100 nm to provide peak gain at around 1550 nm. Raman gain is polarization dependent, and may de-polarize the Raman pump sources to avoid polarization dependent signal gain. Depolarization may be done by Lyot de-polarizers or may also provide similar pump power at orthogonal pump polarization states using a polarization multiplexer or a polarization beam combiner.
These methods may be achieved by characterizing the EDF saturation properties where the gain and pump power absorption is measured. A fully pump saturated EDF may produce a fixed amount of gain per unit length while allowing the excess pump power to pass through. The gain from a length of fiber will then be constant across a range of pump power while allowing the remnant optical pump power to pass through. The architecture above, with a carefully selected length of EDF, would thus satisfy a fixed gain need across a variety of Raman pump powers once a certain Raman pump power threshold has been reached. The Raman pump power may then be used to control the transmission fiber gain while having a constant step gain similar to the expected component and connector attenuation around the well head.
It may be necessary to limit the optical power reaching free-space optical components, reflective elements 1600, with lens arrangements and optical connectors in order to reduce the risk of thermal damage. This may be performed by using the fused fiber WDM 1300 to filter out and reflect Raman pump power and other filters and/or WDMs may be used to filter out excess optical power close to the signal bands. Various notch filters and/or Amplified Spontaneous Emission (ASE) filters may be added as needed.
Large mode field or Large Effective Area fibers (LEAFs) have been developed for long haul repeaterless subsea transmission to minimize the need for active amplifier stations along the seafloor and to eliminate or to minimize non-linear multiwavelength optical signal interaction (crosstalk) effects along the fiber length. LEAF fibers effectively allow high power optical transmission due primarily to reduced optical power density across the mode field diameter within the fiber optic waveguide core guidance region. Aforementioned non-linear effects may comprise Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS), Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS), Self-Phase Modulation (SPM), Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM), and/or Four-Wave Mixing (FWM). As such, reduced power density effectively also allows an increased optical transmission power from pump lasers without approaching power damage threshold at glass fiber end faces and/or micro-optic elements. A person skilled in the art recognizes that the fiber in the umbilical and flowline may have different properties than the downhole sensing fiber.
Amplification methods of DAS system 150 may be utilized to increase the length of fiber optic cables 128. Remote signal amplification in the 1550 nm band may be realized using various methods. As previously pointed out, Raman laser pump light, typically at shorter wavelengths (higher photon energies) or perhaps near 1450 nm, may be transmitted along the primary transmission fiber where, via non-linear Raman scattering, energy from the shorter pump wavelengths is coupled into the longer 1550 nm band signal wavelengths to produce effective gain.
Laser pump light may be made to propagate in the same direction as the outgoing 1550 nm probe signal (co-propagation) or it may propagate in the opposite direction to the 1550 nm probe signal (counter-propagation). In many instances, counter-propagation may exhibit higher energy transfer efficiency.
Optical pump power transmission via ancillary multimode fibers of DAS system 150 may be utilized to increase the length of fiber optic cables 128. Optical pump power may be separately transmitted via multimode transmission fibers 706 to remote EDF amplifier nodes where tap WDM couplers may be fed to the local EDF modules for localized pumping and amplification. Multiple pump lasers may be located at the surface and their powers combined via special Pump Signal Combiners to effectively sum multiple pump diode laser source powers onto a common large core multimode transmission fiber for pump light distribution along the signal path for periodic tapping where needed. Alternatively,
Additionally,
Further illustrated in
As shown and discussed above, light pulses may traverse a number of transmission fibers and connectors before reaching wellhead installation 112 and downhole sensing fiber 710 (e.g., referring to
Fiber optic cables 128, connectors, and signal routing components all have optical attenuation. Fiber optic interrogators used for fiber optic sensing and reservoir monitoring have an optical dynamic range, or Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR), defined by the maximum signal power that may be launched into a sensing system (transmission fiber, sensing fiber, sensors) and the noise floor of the sensing system.
The maximum signal power that may be launched into fiber optic cables 128 may be limited by the optical source, and this can sometimes be overcome by using optical amplifiers like Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers (EDFAs), where the signal amplitude is increased. EDFAs are opto-electric devices with power supplies, electronics and specialty optics packaged into bench-top enclosures, or rack mount enclosures or miniaturized so that they can be comprised in as sub-components of other electrical systems.
Other limitations of the maximum signal power may comprise thermal damage to connectors or other optical components commonly used in routing optical signals. Free-space optics and lenses are used to build micro-optic components such as, but not limited to, optical isolators, Wavelength Division Multiplexers (WDMs) 1300, filters, circulators 802, 804, and/or the like used to route signals in a directional fashion (e.g., referring to
Yet other limitations comprise non-linear fiber transmission penalties like Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS), Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS), Kerr-effect related phenomena like Self-Phase Modulation (SPM), Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM), modulation instability, soliton formation or Four Wave Mixing (FWM). The non-linear effects are influenced by a number of parameters such as fiber dispersion, fiber effective area, channel spacing in WDM systems, signal intensity and source line width.
The noise floor and system SNR may in many instances be limited by interrogator system design, photo detector noise, optical component losses, and/or the like. The use of EDFAs may also be considered and optimized as both signal and noise may be amplified, and small signal gain is typically higher than large signal gain. Optical component losses prior to the gain element in the EDFA may also decrease the signal to noise. EDFA's are characterized by Noise Figure (NF) which is a measure of the degradation of the SNR. For example, if the signal is amplified the noise may be amplified even more and the losses prior to the gain element may reduce the signal amplitude so the actual SNR may be reduced.
Other challenges with pulsed sensing systems like Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS), Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS), and Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) systems where back scattered light is measured is the fact that only one signal may propagate through the sensing region of sensing fiber 710 at any given time in order to enable location determination using time of flight. This limits the pulse repetition rate in optical systems, which in turn limits the frequency content of signals as well as the amount of averaging of signals that may be done for any given time period.
Generally, during measurement operations, a fiber optic cable 128 may produce a back scatter profile that is shown in
The level of back scattered intensity is determined by two main factors. The factors are the optical power of the input pulse light and the scattering coefficient of the fiber. Therefore, optical SNR may be increased by increasing the input optical pulse power and/or by increasing the scattering coefficient of the fiber. The maximum input optical peak power is limited by non-linear threshold of the fiber.
In current technology, increasing the input optical pulse power has been explored by way of employing negative dispersion fiber, which has higher non-linear threshold than regular fiber. Additionally, a negative dispersion fiber has been experimentally shown to yield several dB improvements in optical SNR over regular fiber. However, negative dispersion fiber suffers from higher attenuation which causes the optical SNR to decrease faster along the fiber length and detrimental to SNR longer spans of sensing fiber. Additionally, in the case of subsea systems where a long span of transmission fiber is deployed to transport the input optical pulse to the sensing fiber, the maximum pulse power is effectively limited lower by the non-linear threshold of the transmission fiber, and it negates the benefit of the negative dispersion of the sensing fiber.
Alternatively, an enhanced fiber optic cable may be used during measurement operation and produce a higher backscatter intensity but with higher attenuation, as illustrated in
Such enhanced fiber optic cable has been shown to substantially improve the optical SNR by as much as 10 dB to 20 dB over regular fiber. However, the issue of degraded optical SNR along the fiber length still remains, and in fact, the severity of the degradation increases with the enhanced fiber due to inherently higher attenuation. Therefore, a method for developing a fiber that may produce equally high level of backscattered intensity from the end of the fiber as from the front, as seen in the graph of
The methods discussed below are utilized to identify a fiber optic cable that may be used in a planned DAS system 150 to overcome and actively mitigate the loss discussed above. Identifying a specific type of fiber optic cable 128 for a designed DAS system 150 may allow for long transmission lengths to be virtually invisible from a sensing system perspective while maintaining a healthy Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR) by creating a largely loss-less transmission span using a combination of distributed and point gain elements strategically placed in the overall system architecture.
In block 3506, for each sensing region, losses are identified and characterized. Losses are identified if a connector, splice or a junction box is disposed at a location within DAS system 150. At the connector or junction box, loss is known based at least in part on the specification of the connector or junction box. For this disclosure, a connector is any device disposed on a fiber optic cable, such as a circulator 700, optical amplifier 800, WDM 1000, and/or the like (e.g., referring to
In block 3606, a laser pulse output power of transmitter 900 from DAS 1400 may incrementally increase power from a minimum to a maximum. Without limitation, incremental increase may be about five percent, about ten percent, about twenty percent, about twenty five percent, about thirty percent about forty percent, and/or about fifty percent. During this process, the laser pulse output power performs a sweep in which the power in increased incrementally and the SNR is measured at each increment. In this context, a sweep is defined as one or more measurement for each power increment setting starting at a minimum power output and proceeding to a maximum power output, or vice versa. While sweeping is discussed for laser pulse output power, sweeping may also be utilized for varying the signal pulse power and/or signal pulse width and/or gauge length as many DAS systems allow different pulse power/width/gauge length depending on the requirements for the different applications. It should be noted that the power from Raman Pump 1100 is kept the same during the sweep. Signal strength is measured at each increase during the sweep. As power is incrementally increased in the laser pulse output power of transmitter 900, signal strength and/or SNR is measured and recorded using by signal strength monitoring modules 1700/1702 and/or DAS interrogator 1902 (e.g., referring to
In block 3608, if the power from Raman Pump 1100 is not at maximum, blocks 3602-3608 may be repeated until the power from Raman Pump 1100 is at a maximum and cannot be increased anymore. The measurements taken from blocks 3604 and 3606 may be utilized to tune Raman Pump 1100 and transmitter 900. For example, signal strength monitoring modules 1700/1702 may monitor signal strength as a function of distance. Thus, the signal strength vs. wavelength over distance may be used to determine optimum profile/change in Raman gain when there may be multiple wavelengths in Raman Pump 1100. This may allow for Raman amplification to create a uniform gain for all laser pulse outputs from transmitter 900 (e.g., referring to
Thus, in block 3610, Raman Pump 1100 and laser pulse output from transmitter 900 may be tuned and/or configured to the measurements taken in blocks 3604 and 3606 that maximize signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio within DAS system 150. Once this is performed, Raman Pump 1500 may be tuned on the receiving side DAS system 150.
In block 3612, with Raman Pump 1100 and transmitter 900 tunned to maximize SNR, Raman Pump 1500 (on the receiving side of DAS system 150), starting at zero, may be incrementally increased in power. The receiving side of DAS system 150 may allow for the transmission of the return signal, which is described above. Without limitation, incremental increase may be about five percent, about ten percent, about twenty percent, about twenty five percent, about thirty percent about forty percent, and/or about fifty percent. In block 3614, signal strength may be measured and recorded using signal strength monitoring modules 1700/1702, using the methods and systems described above. In block 3616, Raman Pump 1500 may be tuned and/or configured to the measurements taken in blocks 3614 that maximize signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio within DAS system 150 for both the transmission and receiving side of DAS system 150. As noted above, workflow 3600 may be utilized for DAS system 1400 and B-DTS 1402 (e.g., referring to
Improvements over current technology is the ability to target specific sensing and measurement applications where SNR requirements may vary over depth and time. The custom fiber gain profile may allow different system gain levels used at different time to optimize different applications where signal pulse characteristics, for example, power and/or pulse width and/or gauge length may be changed to meet application specific SNR requirements. A change in sensing application (i.e., a change in pulse power and/or pulse width and/or gauge length or other similar system parameters) may utilize a system SNR optimization given that optical attenuation, system and interrogator losses, laser degradation etc. may vary over time. The DAS system may incorporate shutters in the return path to allow blocking back scattered light as a function of time if some sections of the fiber exceed certain thresholds. The systems and methods for a DAS system 150 (e.g., referring to
Statement 1: A method for tuning a distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) system. The method may comprise determining a signal strength from a first Raman Pump in the DAS system, sweeping a laser pulse output from a transmitter; wherein the sweeping is an incremental increase of a power of the laser pulse output from a minimum pulse power to a maximum pulse power, and measuring a first signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) for each of the incremental increase of the power of the laser pulse output. The method may further comprise selecting a maximum SNR from the first SNR for each of the incremental increase of the power of the laser pulse output and configuring the first Raman Pump and the laser pulse output based at least in part on the maximum SNR.
Statement 2: The method of statement 1, further comprising measuring a back reflection with a signal strength monitoring module.
Statement 3: The method of statement 2, wherein a high back reflection indicates a broken fiber optic cable or an optical connector not mated or a high reflection optical connection.
Statement 4: The method of any previous statements 1 or 2, wherein the signal strength is measured with a signal strength monitoring module.
Statement 5: The method of any previous statements 1, 2, or 4, wherein the transmitter is disposed in a Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) system.
Statement 6: The method of any previous statements 1, 2, 4, or 5, wherein the transmitter is disposed in a Brillouin Distributed Temperature Sensing (B-DTS) system.
Statement 7: The method of any previous statements 1, 2, or 4-6, wherein the transmitter is disposed in a Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS) system.
Statement 8: The method of any previous statements 1, 2, or 4-7, further comprising increasing the signal strength from the first Raman Pump to form a second signal strength, sweeping the laser pulse output from the transmitter in the distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) system, wherein the sweeping is an incremental increase of the power of the laser pulse output from a minimum pulse power to a maximum pulse power, and measuring a second SNR for each of the incremental increase of the power of the laser pulse output. The method may further comprise selecting the maximum SNR from the first SNR or second SNR and configuring the first Raman Pump and the laser pulse output based at least in part on the maximum SNR.
Statement 9: The method of statement 8, further comprising increasing the second signal strength of the Raman Pump incrementally to a maximum signal strength is reached.
Statement 10: The method of statements 8 or 9, further comprising measuring the second signal strength with a signal strength monitoring module.
Statement 11: The method of any previous statements 8-10, further comprising determining the signal strength from a second Raman Pump in a distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) system, increasing the signal strength incrementally from the second Raman Pump, and measuring a third signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) for each of the incremental increase of the second Raman Pump. The method may further comprise selecting the maximum SNR from the third SNR for each of the incremental increase of the power of the laser pulse output and configuring the second Raman Pump based at least in part on the maximum SNR.
Statement 12: The method of statement 11, further comprising increasing the signal strength of the second Raman Pump incrementally to a maximum signal strength is reached.
Statement 13: The method of statements 11 or 12, further comprising measuring the signal strength from the second Raman Pump with a signal strength monitoring module.
Statement 14: A method may comprise identifying one or more sensing zones for one or more sensing fibers of a distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) system, identifying a gain profile for each of the one or more sensing regions, identifying one or more losses for each of the one or more sensing regions, and creating an attenuation profile for each of the one or more sensing regions. The method may further comprise creating a fiber profile to counter the attenuation profile and the losses for the one or more sensing regions and forming an enhanced fiber optic cable based at least in part on the fiber profile.
Statement 15: The method of statement 14, further comprising disposing the enhanced fiber optic cable into a wellbore.
Statement 16: The method of statement 15, wherein the enhanced fiber optic cable is a sensing fiber.
Statement 17: The method of statements 15 or 16, wherein the enhanced fiber optic cable is a transmission fiber.
Statement 18: The method of any previous statements 15-17, wherein a transmitter is connected to the enhanced fiber optic cable.
Statement 19: The method of statement 18, wherein the transmitter is disposed in a Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) system.
Statement 20: The method of statements 18 or 19, wherein the transmitter is disposed in a Brillouin Distributed Temperature Sensing (B-DTS) system.
Although the present disclosure and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations may be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims. The preceding description provides various examples of the systems and methods of use disclosed herein which may contain different method steps and alternative combinations of components. It should be understood that, although individual examples may be discussed herein, the present disclosure covers all combinations of the disclosed examples, including, without limitation, the different component combinations, method step combinations, and properties of the system. It should be understood that the compositions and methods are described in terms of “comprising,” “containing,” or “including” various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also “consist essentially of” or “consist of” the various components and steps. Moreover, the indefinite articles “a” or “an,” as used in the claims, are defined herein to mean one or more than one of the element that it introduces.
For the sake of brevity, only certain ranges are explicitly disclosed herein. However, ranges from any lower limit may be combined with any upper limit to recite a range not explicitly recited, as well as, ranges from any lower limit may be combined with any other lower limit to recite a range not explicitly recited, in the same way, ranges from any upper limit may be combined with any other upper limit to recite a range not explicitly recited. Additionally, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit and an upper limit is disclosed, any number and any comprised range falling within the range are specifically disclosed. In particular, every range of values (of the form, “from about a to about b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a to b,” or, equivalently, “from approximately a-b”) disclosed herein is to be understood to set forth every number and range encompassed within the broader range of values even if not explicitly recited. Thus, every point or individual value may serve as its own lower or upper limit combined with any other point or individual value or any other lower or upper limit, to recite a range not explicitly recited.
Therefore, the present examples are well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. The particular examples disclosed above are illustrative only, and may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Although individual examples are discussed, the disclosure covers all combinations of all of the examples. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. Also, the terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee. It is therefore evident that the particular illustrative examples disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of those examples. If there is any conflict in the usages of a word or term in this specification and one or more patent(s) or other documents that may be incorporated herein by reference, the definitions that are consistent with this specification should be adopted.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240133753 A1 | Apr 2024 | US |