Today electronic device users often share content with other users on the web using a variety of different mechanisms including e-mail, social networking sites, instant messaging, photo sharing sites, social bookmarking sites, and blogs, to name a few. However, many operating systems executing on the devices typically do not play a role in facilitating sharing. Instead, for example, users generally have to rely on generic functions like the clipboard to copy and paste content from one application/website to another, or they have to use sharing functionality provided by each individual application/website. Other current content sharing techniques include “drag and drop” to move content from one application/website to another, and use of a file manager/browser application such as Microsoft Corporation's Windows® Explorer which exposes extensibility points as COM (common object model) interfaces to enable sharing. Some web browser plug-ins can also currently facilitate content sharing.
Although these current mechanisms function satisfactorily in some cases, they have limitations and are not specifically tailored for content sharing which can often make the user experience when sharing less than ideal. For example, users need to switch from their current application to use the clipboard to share content and applications/websites receiving the content do not specifically enable copy and paste with the clipboard to support sharing. Drag and drop is similarly limited by this lack of specific enablement for content sharing which can result in the user experience being cumbersome and not well streamlined. Using Explorer involves taking steps needed to store content for sharing locally and works only from Explorer and not for any content shown by a Windows application. Browser plug-ins for sharing are similarly limited to working just in the browser and cannot be extended to content shown by a Windows application.
This Background is provided to introduce a brief context for the Summary and Detailed Description that follow. This Background is not intended to be an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter nor be viewed as limiting the claimed subject matter to implementations that solve any or all of the disadvantages or problems presented above.
An operating system provides an extensible share action to broker content sharing between applications executing on a computing platform such as a personal computer, tablet computer, or smartphone. The share action enables a consistent user experience for content sharing to be implemented across all applications and eliminates users having to switch from the current application they are using to some other functionality in order to share content. Applications can participate with the operating system share action as source applications and/or target applications. Source applications may describe what content is shareable given the current state of their application when the user chooses to invoke the share action. Target applications can be configured to receive the shared content from the source application according to content type, and will expose a companion view of their application to the user that is specifically tailored to facilitate sharing.
In various illustrative examples, target applications register the content types they can accept and target application developers are responsible for building the specifically tailored companion view of the application that is executed on the platform during content sharing. The user can access the share action by invoking an action space that is available from anywhere (e.g., the desktop, all user interfaces (UIs), and all applications) at any time. The action space provides a consistent entry point to a set of system actions, one of which is the share action. So if a user is looking at a picture using a source application such as a picture viewer, and selects the share action from the action space, a filtered list of target applications that can accept the shareable content by content type (e.g., photographs in this example) is displayed on a share UI. Target applications can include any of a variety of applications such as social networking, e-mail, photo sharing, other communication applications, and the like. The target applications facilitate content sharing with various different sharing endpoints including websites, individuals, multiple people, or categories of people.
When a user selects a target application from the list, the operating system launches the companion view of that application and the user completes his or her share in that application. This interaction means that the source and the target applications do not need to be aware of one another—they can simply participate in the present sharing paradigm by describing shareable content that they can provide as a source application or that they can accept as a target. The operating system acts as the broker for the sharing by passing the content and other information such as content properties and metadata in some cases, from the source to the target application. When the user share action is complete, the target application passes a message to the operating system to close the UI of the companion view. It can also pass back a shortcut that describes the action the user just completed. When the user performs a subsequent share, the shortcut can be presented to the user in the share UI as part of a list of frequently used user-actions. The target application may upload the shared content to the appropriate sharing endpoint, for example as a background process.
Advantageously, the present share action enables users to maintain the context of an interaction with a given application without having to leave what they are doing, start up another application, or open up another tab in a browser, and then perform multiple steps to implement sharing using the current techniques. Utilization of the companion view of the target application further enhances the user experience when sharing by tailoring the UI and functionality to sharing specifically as compared with the sub optimal experience that is commonly experienced when using generic techniques.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Like reference numerals indicate like elements in the drawings. Elements are not drawn to scale unless otherwise indicated.
As shown, the users 105 may communicate among each other and interact with various services on the World Wide Web using public network infrastructure such as the Internet 115. The services in this example include a news service 1201, a social networking service 1202, photo sharing service 1203, and various other services or websites as representatively indicated by reference numeral 120N.
The operating system 215 is configured, in this illustrative example, to perform various actions 220 and expose various interfaces 225. The actions 220 are described in more detail in the text accompanying
It is noted that the operating system 215 will not typically be identically configured in each instance of a computing platform 110. In other words, differences in features, functionalities, structures, and methods implemented by the operating system 215, among other differences, can be expected according to the needs of a given platform. However, principles of the present system action for sharing may be adapted to various operating systems. That is, the share action may be readily adapted to a variety of operating systems, computing platforms, usage scenarios, and environments.
As shown in
As shown in
In this illustrative example, the shared content 415 is referred to by a data bundle reference 520 so that properties and/or metadata (indicated by reference numeral 525) associated with the shared content 415 may also be passed to the target application 510. Such property/metadata 525 may include, for example, the title of the linked webpage or other descriptive data. The reference 520 is received by the operating system 215 and passed to the target application 510 which then reads the data bundle.
In an alternative implementation, a share button can be hosted by a source application. In this case, sharing can be initiated by the user 105 from within that source application rather than through use of the action space of consistent entry points supported by the operating system.
When the user selects the share action, as indicated by reference numeral 610, a target picker 620 is exposed so that the user 105 can specify a sharing end point 420 (
When the user 105 selects the sharing shortcut/target application, the target application 510 will launch its companion application that will present a share screen 630 (i.e., UI) to the user. As shown in
Returning to
Optionally, as indicated by reference numeral 635, the share screen 630 may also expose an interface to enable the user 105 to choose a particular person to receive the shared content.
When the user executes the sharing of the content, as indicated by reference numeral 645, the share screen 630 provided by the companion application is collapsed and the workflow control is returned to the source application 505, as indicated by reference numeral 650. Thus, the present share action enables the user 105 to take a few simple steps to share content without having to leave the context provided by the source application 505.
When the share button 820 is actuated from the action space 815, the target picker is displayed on the UI 800 as indicated by reference numeral 905 in
The target picker 905 also displays a list of shortcuts indicated by reference numeral 925 and a list of sharing applications indicated by reference numeral 930. The presentation of the shortcuts in sharing applications can vary but may typically include an icon and some associated descriptive text. For example, shortcut 935 (shown in an enlarged view in
When the user 105 is ready to share the content, the user can actuate the share button 1155 to complete the share action. As shown in the workflow 1200 depicted in
By implementing the uploading as a background process, the user 105 can quickly be returned back to the source application 505 (
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a Continuation of, and claims benefit from, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/974,028 that was filed on Dec. 21, 2010, and that is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5765156 | Guzak | Jun 1998 | A |
5862377 | Lee | Jan 1999 | A |
5956036 | Glaser et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
7152116 | Austin | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7284203 | Meeks et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7640550 | Goel | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7665028 | Cummins et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8117277 | Nikiel et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
9110743 | Messerly | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20030058277 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040015539 | Alegria | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040193621 | Moore et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050086309 | Galli | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108456 | Boutcher et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050198247 | Perry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246588 | Deng et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060123010 | Landry et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156308 | Jarvis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206587 | Fabbrocino | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248122 | Nikiel | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070067726 | Flynt | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157104 | Blain | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080027909 | Gang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034038 | Ciudad | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077867 | Hake et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080098327 | Berkovitz et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090037517 | Frei | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090157741 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164475 | Pottenger | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090234876 | Schigel et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090265634 | Beringer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090328041 | Sudzilouski | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100049788 | Bandaru | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100077336 | Ording et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20120159334 | Messerly | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179522 | Adachi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209946 | McClure et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130212183 | Ward | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140032810 | Kanigicherla | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-035896 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-113180 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2006-190008 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2009-076080 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2 306 620 | Sep 2007 | RU |
2 322 702 | Apr 2008 | RU |
2 340 380 | Dec 2008 | RU |
2 406 120 | Dec 2010 | RU |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/974,028, filed Dec. 21, 2010, Messerly. |
CN Decision on Rejection for Application No. 201110432288.6, dated Jul. 31, 2015. |
JP Notice of Reason for Rejection for Application No. 2013-546267, dated Oct. 13, 2015. |
AU Patent Examination Report No. 1 for Application No. 2011349585, dated Apr. 8, 2016. |
CN Notice of Reexamination for Application No. 201110432288.6, dated May 30, 2016. |
European Patent Office, EP Communication for Application No. 11851525.3, 8 pages, Aug. 3, 2016, Germany. |
Bai, “Coordination in Intelligent Grid Environments”, In Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, No. 3, Mar. 2005, pp. 613-630. |
Marjanovic, “Sharing Innovative Teaching Practices—the Knowledge Management Approach”, In Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Jun. 23-26, 2008, Cavtat, Croatia, pp. 539-544. |
Chinese State Intellectual Property Office, CN Reexamination Decision for Application No. 201110432288.6, Nov. 28, 2016, pp. 1-4, China. |
Australian Patent Office, Author unknown, AU Notice of Acceptance for Application No. 2011349585, dated Sep. 20, 2016, 3 pages, Australia. |
CN Third Office Action for Application No. 201110432288.6, dated Feb. 28, 2015. |
CN Second Office Action for Application No. 201110432288.6, dated Nov. 2, 2014. |
CN First Office Action for Application No. 201110432288.6, dated Feb. 13, 2014. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Sep. 3, 2012, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/065703, pp. 1-10. |
Williams, Stephen A., “Using SoftBench to Integrate Heterogeneous Software Development Environments”, Retrieved at <<http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/97feb/feb97a5.pdf>>, Feb. 1997, pp. 1-7. |
Russian Patent Office, RU Decision on Grant for Application No. 2013128366, pp. 1-10, May 12, 2016, Russia. |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2013128366”, dated Jan. 11, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2013128366”, dated Aug. 6, 2013, 4 Pages. |
“Office Action and Search Report Issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,821,507”, dated Sep. 21, 2017, 4 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-546267”, dated Apr. 4, 2016, 4 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2016277609”, dated Jan. 24, 2018, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7016192”, dated Feb. 20, 2018, 3 Pages. |
“Examiner's Report Issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,821,507”, dated May 2, 2018, 5 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150339176 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12974028 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14817500 | US |