1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates in general to lottery games. More particularly, the invention relates to a lottery game in which winning numbers are determined by an accompanying game.
2. Description of the Related Art
Traditionally a lottery chooses its winner by means that is not affected by action of lottery players. For example, in a raffle game, a winner is chosen by selecting a winning number from a set of numbers, and the selection is not affected by each player's action. Some lotteries have taken a different approach, in which the winning number is indirectly affected by players. An example of this approach is “Darkhorse Wagering” disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,098,797. Darkhorse Wagering permits a player to make selections that affect the outcome of the game, and the least popular player selection is chosen to be the winner. In Darkhorse Wagering the winner is always the least popular player selection, which means that majority of players will not win most of time, and they may lose interest in the game in the long run. Therefore, it is to an extension lottery game in which players who make popular choices may occasionally win that the present invention is primary directed.
The current invention is an extension to a lottery game. A player participates in an extension game by selecting or having assigned game indicia. Winners are determined for a base game. Thereafter the indicia for the extension game selected by winners of the base game are designated winning indicia for the extension game. Prizes for the extension game are based on matches with these designated winning indicia.
In one embodiment, there is provided a method for playing a lottery game. The method includes the steps of playing a base game and receiving a base game entry, electing to play a second lottery game in addition to the base game and selecting game indicia for said second game, selecting a winning entry for the base game, assigning winning game indicia for the second game to be the game indicia selected for the second game on the winning base game entry, comparing said winning game indicia to the game indicia of additional base game entrants that elected to play the second game so that winners of the second game are determined based on matches with the indicia for the second game on the winning base game entry, and awarding prizes to winners of the base game only, the second game only, and both the base game and the second game.
In another embodiment, there is provided another method for playing a lottery game. The method includes receiving a set of selected digits for an extension game from a player, issuing a game ticket with set of selected digits for a base game to the player, selecting a winning ticket for the base game, determining selected digits associated with the winning ticket, and determining a prize for each game ticket having the selected digits.
In yet another embodiment there is provided a system for playing an extension game to a lottery game. The system includes a plurality of game terminals and a lottery game server. Each terminal is capable of accepting lottery game entries from players and offering a player an opportunity to player the extension game. The lottery game server communicates with the plurality of game terminals, and the lottery game server is capable of receiving a set of selected digits for the extension game from a player, issuing a game ticket with the set of selected digits for the lottery game to the player, selecting a winning ticket for the lottery game, determining selected digits associated with the winning ticket, and determining a prize for each game ticket having the selected digits.
The current invention is an extension game to a lottery game. In addition to the requirements for a base game, the player selects indicia for the extension game. The base game is conducted, and winners are determined for the base game. The indicia for the extension game selected by the winners of the base game are designated as winning indicia for the extension game. Winners for the extension game are determined based on matches with these designated winning indicia. Percentages of the prize fund for the lottery game are reserved for the winners of the extension game. The popularity of the player-selected indicia controls the win frequency and magnitude of the extension prize. Popular player indicia tend to win more often as these indicia are more likely to have been chosen by winners of the base game. However, popular indicia tend to pay less as the pari-mutuel prize fund is more diluted. Conversely, less popular indicia tend to win less often but the prizes tend to be of higher magnitude. In this way, players can strategize as to the win frequency and magnitude of the prizes by gauging the popularity of the indicia they select.
The invention provides a method by which a lottery game incorporates a raffle. The player selects indicia for a lottery game and is assigned a raffle number. The raffle is conducted and a raffle winner determined. At least one of the indicia selected by the raffle winner is conferred winning indicia. Other winning indicia may be determined by a random game process. Prizes are based on the outcome of the raffle and/or matches with the winning indicia.
One embodiment is a variation of a digits game. In a digits game a player selects a permutation of digits and a bet type. For example, a “straight” bet means that the player wins a prize if his selection matches the lottery's in exact order. Prizes are either set or pari-mutuel. Each of these methods has disadvantages. If prizes are set, the payout is volatile. For example, a set prize for a straight bet for a 3-digits game is $500, based on an average 50% payout and a $1 wager. However, “triples” such as 7-7-7 are popular selections. If and when such a triple is drawn, the payout may be exceedingly large and difficult for the lottery to absorb. On the other hand, if prizes are pari-mutuel, the lottery avoids volatility, but some players are at a disadvantage. For example, the pari-mutuel prize fund for a straight bet for a 3-digits game may be 50%. Popular selections are at a disadvantage in that the prize fund is diluted by a large number of winners. In general, a player of 7-7-7 would win less than that of a less popular selection. The current invention can be embodied as a numbers game in such a way that the lottery avoids volatility and the payout is the same for all player selections.
In another embodiment the base game is a raffle and the extension is a numbers game. The player pays $2 and selects 2 digits from 00 to 99.
Additional examples of the inventive game of this invention are disclosed below:
In the above examples, the prize for the base game (i.e., the raffle) is a cash prize. However, the game could easily be embodied as to award merchandise, rather than cash, as the raffle prize. For example, 10% of sales could be allotted for a raffle prize fund as illustrated for several examples below.
In Example 3, the invention can be embodied such that the game indicia are symbols. For example, the invention could be embodied based on an animal theme. The player selects an “animal” via a playslip 900 as in
In Example 4, the current invention can be combined with a standard lottery game wherein a set of winning numbers is randomly determined by the lottery authority and prizes are based on the number of matches between a play's and the winning numbers. In addition to his play comprising a set of numbers, the player selects a “bonus number” from a field of numbers, for example, from the 10 digits 0 to 9. He is also assigned a raffle number.
The prizes for example 4 are determined by two tables illustrated in
The prize table 1700 in
Following the Jackpot prize for matching 6 numbers, prizes for various matches in the base game with and without the bonus number are illustrated in
First, a set percentage of the sales is allocated exclusively for “bonus number prizes,” i.e. prizes added to base game prizes for also matching the bonus number. In this exemplary embodiment, 19% of sales is set aside for these prizes. The 19% is subdivided into 4 allocations corresponding to matching 5, 4, 3, or 2 in the base game and matching the bonus number: 1% for matching 5, 2% for matching 4, 4% for matching 3 and 12% for matching 2. Furthermore, if there are no bonus number winners corresponding to one of theses allocations, then that percentage is rolled down to the next level. For example, if there are no plays that both matched 5 in the base game and matched the bonus number, then the 1% allocated for that level is rolled down to the matching 4 level. The percentage for matching 4 in the base game and the bonus number would then be 2%+1%=3%.
Shares are computed for each level (i.e., matching 5, 4, 3, or 2 in the base game) and a play is awarded a share for the highest level for which he qualifies and each lower level. A Type 5 share is computed by dividing the percentage corresponding to matching 5 by the number of winners that both matched 5 in the base game and matched the bonus number. A Type 4 share is computed by dividing the percentage corresponding to matching 4 by the number of winners that both matched 4 or 5 in the base game and matched the bonus number. A Type 3 share is computed by dividing the percentage corresponding to matching 3 by the number of plays that both matched 3, 4 or 5 in the base game and matched the bonus number. A Type 2 share is computed by dividing the percentage corresponding to matching 2 by the number of plays that both matched 2, 3, 4, or 5 in the base game and matched the bonus number.
A play that matches 2 in the base game and matches the bonus number is awarded a Type 2 share. A play that matches 3 in the base game and matches the bonus number is awarded a Type 2 share plus a Type 3 share. A play that matches 4 in the base game and matches the bonus number is awarded a Type 2 share plus a Type 3 share plus a Type 4 share. A play that matches 5 in the base game and matches the bonus number is awarded a Type 2 share plus a Type 3 share plus a Type 4 share plus a Type 5 share. Note that this way of awarding multiple shares ensures that plays at higher levels win higher prizes. For example, a play that matches 5 in the base game and matches the bonus number would necessarily have at least as high a prize as a play that matched 4 in the base game and matched the bonus number.
To illustrate this method of assigning “bonus number prizes,” suppose that sales for a particular draw of this game are $200,000 (100,000 plays) and suppose that 30,000 plays have 7 selected as the bonus number. Furthermore, suppose that the raffle winner selected 7 as the bonus number. This sets the winning bonus number as 7. Suppose the results of the game are as those illustrated in
For example, if the drawn numbers are 10, 15, 27, 29, 33, 34 and the drawn raffle number is 82901440, then the ticket 1300 in
Those skilled in the art of Mathematics can verify that the return for this game is 23.0% (Jackpot)+5.0% (raffle prize)+15.1% (base game prizes for matching 3, 4, or 5)+19.0% (added to base game prizes for bonus number prizes)=62.1%.
In Example 5, another embodiment presents a play with 3 components: a digit from 0 to 9, a symbol selected from a set (in this case, based on an animal theme), and a raffle number. In this example, each play costs $5. The player may choose the number and/or the symbol, and the ticket is assigned a raffle number. An exemplary ticket 2000 is in
In Example 6, an alternative embodiment is similar to that of Example 5. This embodiment presents a play with 3 components: a symbol selected by the player from a set of symbols, a set of 10 2-digit numbers assigned by the lottery, and a raffle number assigned by the lottery authority. Again in this example, the ticket price is set to $5. An exemplary ticket 2500 is in
In Example 7, an embodiment of the current invention is combined with a standard lottery game. The price is $5 and an exemplary ticket 3000 is shown in FIG. 30. The “base game” involves, for example, the lottery authority drawing 6 numbers out of 48 and the player matching numbers in his play to the drawn numbers. There are 5 lines for the “base game” on the ticket. A player wins prizes per line and is awarded the sum of these prizes. The prizes for the base game are illustrated in
Unlike Darkhorse Wagering disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,098,797, in the current invention, the outcome is not determined explicitly by the popularity of a selection, but rather by an outside mechanism: the outcome of another game. That is, in Darkhorse Wagering, based only on the player selections, a winner is determined: the least popular selection. In the current invention, based on the player selections, probabilities can be assigned to outcomes, but the winner is not determined. It is still possible for any selection to win.
Another difference from Darkhorse Wagering is that in the current invention the return to the player is independent of the popularity of a selection. The more popular a selection, the greater probability of winning, but the less the magnitude of the prize. In terms of the return to the player, there is no advantage or disadvantage based on the popularity of a selection. Some players may prefer to play popular numbers with a greater probability of winning, and some players may prefer to play unpopular numbers for larger prizes, and so on. In contrast, in Darkhorse Wagering, it is always to the player's advantage to try to make an unpopular selection.
The fact that the return is independent of the popularity of a selection is an advantage of this invention over Darkhorse Wagering in that the current invention does not involve skill. The lottery may prefer, or it may be a matter of law, that a lottery game does not involve skill. In Darkhorse Wagering, if information about players' selections is available, for the current game or in the form of historical data, a player could potentially use this to his advantage. There would necessarily be some historical data as winning selections are publicly disclosed. Thus, in Darkhorse Wagering there is an element of skill involved.
At a predetermined time, the lottery authority selects a base game winner, step 3506. The base game winner can be selected through traditional methods, such as drawing a winning ticket from a barrel or obtaining numbered balls from different ball machines. Alternatively, the winner can also be determined by the lottery authority server. After the base game winner is determined, the lottery authority can identify the winning number of the extension game, step 3508. Once the winner number of the extension game is determined, the lottery authority server can easily check its record and determine winners of the extension game, step 3510, and calculate the prize for each extension game winner, step 3512. The prize for each extension game winner will be announced and the lottery authority can then pay prizes for each winner, step 3514. The prize can also be paid at the each lottery terminal upon presentation of a ticket with the winning extension game number.
Although several preferred embodiments of the invention have been disclosed in the foregoing specification, it is understood by those skilled in the art that many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to mind to which the invention pertains, having the benefit of the teaching presented in the foregoing description and associated drawings. It is thus understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed herein, and that many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, although specific terms are employed herein, as well as in the claims, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only, and not for the purposes of limiting the described invention, nor the claims which follow below.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/634,210, Extension To A Lottery Game For Which Winning Indicia Are Set by Selections Made By Winners Of The Base Lottery Game, filed on Dec. 8, 2004, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1527929 | Simons | Feb 1925 | A |
3089123 | Hennis et al. | May 1963 | A |
3245697 | Nugent | Apr 1966 | A |
3699311 | Dunbar | Oct 1972 | A |
3736368 | Vogelman et al. | May 1973 | A |
3826499 | Lenkoff | Jul 1974 | A |
3868057 | Chavez | Feb 1975 | A |
3876865 | Bliss | Apr 1975 | A |
3902253 | Sabuzawa et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3918174 | Miller et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3922529 | Orloff | Nov 1975 | A |
3934120 | Maymarev | Jan 1976 | A |
4017834 | Cuttill et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4095824 | Bachman | Jun 1978 | A |
4105156 | Dethloff | Aug 1978 | A |
4176406 | Matkan | Nov 1979 | A |
4191376 | Goldman et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4194296 | Pagnozzi et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4195772 | Nishimura | Apr 1980 | A |
4206920 | Weatherford et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4241942 | Bachman | Dec 1980 | A |
4243216 | Mazumder | Jan 1981 | A |
4273362 | Carrier et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4309452 | Sachs | Jan 1982 | A |
4313087 | Weitzen et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4355300 | Weber | Oct 1982 | A |
4375666 | Buck et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4398708 | Goldman et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4407443 | McCorkle | Oct 1983 | A |
4451759 | Heynisch | May 1984 | A |
4455039 | Weitzen et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4457430 | Darling et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4464423 | LaBianca et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4466614 | Bachman et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4488646 | McCorkle | Dec 1984 | A |
4491319 | Nelson | Jan 1985 | A |
4494197 | Troy et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4536218 | Ganho | Aug 1985 | A |
4544184 | Freund et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4579371 | Long et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4591189 | Holmen et al. | May 1986 | A |
4634149 | Donovan | Jan 1987 | A |
4665502 | Kreisner | May 1987 | A |
4669729 | Solitt et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689742 | Troy et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4726608 | Walton | Feb 1988 | A |
4736109 | Dvorzsak | Apr 1988 | A |
4740016 | Konecny et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4760247 | Keane et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4763927 | Schneider | Aug 1988 | A |
4775155 | Lees | Oct 1988 | A |
4792667 | Chen | Dec 1988 | A |
4805907 | Hagiwara | Feb 1989 | A |
4817951 | Crouch et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4835624 | Black et al. | May 1989 | A |
4836546 | Dire et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4836553 | Suttle et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4837728 | Barrie et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4842278 | Markowicz | Jun 1989 | A |
4856787 | Itkis | Aug 1989 | A |
4861041 | Jones et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4870260 | Niepolomski et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4880964 | Donahue | Nov 1989 | A |
4888964 | Klinge | Dec 1989 | A |
4922522 | Scanlon | May 1990 | A |
4943090 | Fienberg | Jul 1990 | A |
4960611 | Fujisawa et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4961578 | Chateau | Oct 1990 | A |
4964642 | Kamille | Oct 1990 | A |
4996705 | Entenmann et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4998010 | Chandler et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
4998199 | Tashiro et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5032708 | Comerford et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037099 | Burtch | Aug 1991 | A |
5046737 | Fienberg | Sep 1991 | A |
5074566 | Desbiens | Dec 1991 | A |
5083815 | Scrymgeour et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092598 | Kamille | Mar 1992 | A |
5094458 | Kamille | Mar 1992 | A |
5100139 | Di Bella | Mar 1992 | A |
5109153 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112050 | Koza et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116049 | Sludikoff et al. | May 1992 | A |
5118109 | Gumina | Jun 1992 | A |
5119295 | Kapur | Jun 1992 | A |
5129652 | Wilkinson | Jul 1992 | A |
5158293 | Mullins | Oct 1992 | A |
5165967 | Theno et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5186463 | Marin et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5189292 | Batterman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5193815 | Pollard | Mar 1993 | A |
5193854 | Borowski, Jr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5228692 | Carrick et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232221 | Sludikoff et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5234798 | Heninger et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249801 | Jarvis | Oct 1993 | A |
5259616 | Bergmann | Nov 1993 | A |
5273281 | Lovell | Dec 1993 | A |
5276980 | Carter et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282620 | Keesee | Feb 1994 | A |
5308992 | Crane et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317135 | Finocchio | May 1994 | A |
5326104 | Pease et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332219 | Marnell, II et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5342047 | Heidel et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342049 | Wichinsky et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344144 | Canon | Sep 1994 | A |
5346258 | Behn et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5380007 | Travis et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5393057 | Marnell, II et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5401024 | Simunek | Mar 1995 | A |
5403039 | Borowski, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5407199 | Gumina | Apr 1995 | A |
5420406 | Izawa et al. | May 1995 | A |
5432005 | Tanigami et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5451052 | Behm et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456465 | Durham | Oct 1995 | A |
5456602 | Sakuma | Oct 1995 | A |
5470156 | May | Nov 1995 | A |
5471040 | May | Nov 1995 | A |
5472196 | Rusnak | Dec 1995 | A |
5475205 | Behm et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486005 | Neal | Jan 1996 | A |
5513846 | Niederlein et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528154 | Leichner et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536016 | Thompson | Jul 1996 | A |
5540442 | Orselli et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548110 | Storch et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550746 | Jacobs | Aug 1996 | A |
5560610 | Behm et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564700 | Celona | Oct 1996 | A |
5564977 | Algie | Oct 1996 | A |
5591956 | Longacre, Jr. et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5599046 | Behm et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602381 | Hoshino et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5621200 | Irwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628684 | Bouedec | May 1997 | A |
5630753 | Fuchs | May 1997 | A |
5651735 | Baba | Jul 1997 | A |
5655961 | Acres et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5667250 | Behm et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5682819 | Beatty | Nov 1997 | A |
5690366 | Luciano | Nov 1997 | A |
RE35684 | Maeng | Dec 1997 | E |
5704647 | Desbiens | Jan 1998 | A |
5722891 | Inoue | Mar 1998 | A |
5726898 | Jacobs | Mar 1998 | A |
5732948 | Yoseloff | Mar 1998 | A |
5741183 | Acres et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743800 | Huard et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752882 | Acres et al. | May 1998 | A |
5756220 | Hoshino et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768142 | Jacobs | Jun 1998 | A |
5769458 | Carides et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770533 | Franchi | Jun 1998 | A |
5772509 | Weiss | Jun 1998 | A |
5772510 | Roberts | Jun 1998 | A |
5772511 | Smeltzer | Jun 1998 | A |
5779840 | Boris | Jul 1998 | A |
5789459 | Inagaki et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5791990 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797794 | Angell | Aug 1998 | A |
5803504 | Deshiens et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816920 | Hanai | Oct 1998 | A |
5818019 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820459 | Acres et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823874 | Adams | Oct 1998 | A |
5830063 | Byrne | Nov 1998 | A |
5830066 | Goden et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5830067 | Graves et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833537 | Barrie | Nov 1998 | A |
5835576 | Katz | Nov 1998 | A |
5836086 | Elder | Nov 1998 | A |
5836817 | Acres et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848932 | Adams | Dec 1998 | A |
5863075 | Rich et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871398 | Schneier et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876284 | Acres et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882261 | Adams | Mar 1999 | A |
5883537 | Luoni et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885158 | Torango et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887906 | Sultan | Mar 1999 | A |
5903340 | Lawandy et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911418 | Adams | Jun 1999 | A |
5915588 | Stoken et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5934671 | Harrison | Aug 1999 | A |
5970143 | Schneier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979894 | Alexoff | Nov 1999 | A |
5996997 | Kamille | Dec 1999 | A |
5997044 | Behm et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003307 | Naber et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004207 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007162 | Hinz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012982 | Piechowiak et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014032 | Maddix et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017032 | Grippo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024641 | Sarno | Feb 2000 | A |
6053405 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077162 | Weiss | Jun 2000 | A |
6080062 | Olson | Jun 2000 | A |
6086477 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6089978 | Adams | Jul 2000 | A |
6099407 | Parker, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102400 | Scott et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107913 | Gatto et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119364 | Elder | Sep 2000 | A |
6125368 | Bridge et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6142872 | Walker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146272 | Walker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149521 | Sanduski | Nov 2000 | A |
6155491 | Dueker et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168521 | Luciano et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6168522 | Walker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179710 | Sawyer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203430 | Walker et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206373 | Garrod | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210275 | Olsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217448 | Olsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220596 | Walker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220961 | Keane et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224055 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227969 | Yoseloff | May 2001 | B1 |
6238288 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6309300 | Glavich | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312334 | Yoseloff | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315291 | Moody | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330976 | Dymetman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331143 | Yoseloff | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334814 | Adams | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340158 | Pierce et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6368213 | McNabola | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375568 | Roffman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379742 | Behm et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394899 | Walker | May 2002 | B1 |
6398214 | Moteki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6398643 | Knowles et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6398644 | Perrie et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6398645 | Yoseloff | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416408 | Tracy et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6419579 | Bennett | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435408 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435500 | Gumina | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6478677 | Moody | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491215 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497408 | Walker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6552290 | Lawandy | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6588747 | Seelig | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599186 | Walker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601772 | Rubin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6637747 | Garrod | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648735 | Miyashita et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648753 | Tracy et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648755 | Luciano et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6676126 | Walker et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692354 | Tracy et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702047 | Huber | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6773345 | Walker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6776337 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786824 | Cannon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6823874 | Lexcen | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6875105 | Behm et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6929186 | Lapstun | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20010027130 | Namba et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030978 | Holloway et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034262 | Banyai | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040345 | Au-Yeung | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020022511 | Eklund et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020084335 | Ericson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020171201 | Au-Yeung | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187825 | Tracy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030050109 | Caro et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030114210 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040076310 | Hersch et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040173965 | Stanek | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178582 | Garrod | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185931 | Hartman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204222 | Roberts | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259631 | Katz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040266514 | Penrice | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
B-1842892 | Dec 1992 | AU |
B-2107092 | Jul 1993 | AU |
A-5032796 | Feb 1997 | AU |
B-5249996 | Feb 1997 | AU |
199716432 | Sep 1997 | AU |
A-4540397 | Apr 1998 | AU |
A-6355398 | Oct 1998 | AU |
2938307 | Apr 1981 | DE |
3035898 | Apr 1982 | DE |
3035947 | May 1982 | DE |
2938307 | Jun 1982 | DE |
29803107 | Aug 1988 | DE |
3822636 | Jan 1990 | DE |
2938307 | Aug 1990 | DE |
3822636 | Jan 1992 | DE |
3415114 | Oct 1995 | DE |
19646956 | May 1998 | DE |
19706286 | May 1998 | DE |
29816453 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19751746 | May 1999 | DE |
0122902 | Apr 1984 | EP |
0333934 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0458623 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0798676 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0799649 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0149712 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0874337 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0896304 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0914875 | May 1999 | EP |
0914875 | May 1999 | EP |
0919965 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0983801 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0983801 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1149712 | Oct 2001 | EP |
529535 | Jun 1983 | ES |
529536 | Jun 1983 | ES |
2006400 | Apr 1989 | ES |
2006401 | Apr 1989 | ES |
642892 | Sep 1950 | GB |
2075918 | Nov 1981 | GB |
2222712 | Mar 1990 | GB |
2230373 | Oct 1990 | GB |
2295775 | Dec 1996 | GB |
3328311 | Feb 1999 | GB |
23282311 | Feb 1999 | GB |
02235744 | Sep 1990 | JP |
04132672 | May 1992 | JP |
WO8502250 | May 1985 | WO |
WO9117529 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9803910 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9840138 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9909364 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9926204 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9936312 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO0000256 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0078418 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0174460 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0193966 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO02056266 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060119034 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60634210 | Dec 2004 | US |