External adjustment device for distraction device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11974782
  • Patent Number
    11,974,782
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 22, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 7, 2024
    21 days ago
Abstract
A method of positioning an external adjustment device relative to a patient includes placing a magnetic viewing sheet adjacent to a patient and identifying the location of an implanted magnetic assembly using the magnetic viewing sheet by visualizing a magnetic image of the implanted magnetic assembly in the magnetic viewing sheet. The external adjustment device is placed on the patient adjacent to the location where the magnetic image was located.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention generally relates to medical devices for treating disorders of the skeletal system.


BACKGROUND

Scoliosis is a general term for the sideways (lateral) curving of the spine, usually in the thoracic or thoracolumbar region. Scoliosis is commonly broken up into different treatment groups, Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Early Onset Scoliosis and Adult Scoliosis.


Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) typically affects children between ages 10 and 16, and becomes most severe during growth spurts that occur as the body is developing. One to two percent of children between ages 10 and 16 have some amount of scoliosis. Of every 1000 children, two to five develop curses that are serious enough to require treatment. The degree of scoliosis is typically described by the Cobb angle, which is determined, usually from x-ray images, by taking the most tilted vertebrae above and below the apex of the curved portion and measuring the angle between intersecting lines drawn perpendicular to the top of the top vertebrae and the bottom of die bottom. The term idiopathic refers to the fact that the exact cause of this curvature is unknown. Some have speculated that scoliosis occurs when, during rapid growth phases, the ligamentum flavum of the spine is too tight and hinders symmetric growth of the spine. For example, as the anterior portion of the spine elongates faster than the posterior portion, the thoracic spine begins to straighten, until it curves laterally, often with an accompanying rotation. In more severe cases, this rotation actually creates a noticeable deformity, wherein one shoulder is lower than the other. Currently, many school districts perform external visual assessment of spines, for example in all fifth grade students. For those students in whom an “S” shape or “C” shape is identified, instead of an “I” shape, a recommendation is given to have the spine examined by a physician, and commonly followed-up with periodic spinal x-rays.


Typically, patients with a Cobb angle of 20° or less are not treated, but are continually followed up, often with subsequent x-rays. Patients with a Cobb angle of 40° or greater are usually recommended for fusion surgery. It should be noted that many patients do not receive this spinal assessment, for numerous reasons. Many school districts do not perform this assessment, and many children do not regularly visit, a physician, so often, the curve progresses rapidly and severely. There is a large population of grown adults with untreated scoliosis, extreme cases with a Cobb angle as high as or greater than 90°, Many of these adults, though, do not have pain associated with this deformity, and live relatively normal lives, though oftentimes with restricted mobility and motion. In AIS, the ratio of females to males for curves under 10° is about one to one, however, at angles above 30°, females outnumber males by as much, as eight to one. Fusion surgery can be performed on the AIS patients or on adult scoliosis patients. In a typical posterior fusion surgery, an incision is made down the length of the back and Titanium or stainless steel straightening rods are placed along the curved portion. These rods are typically secured to the vertebral bodies, for example with hooks or bone screws, or more specifically pedicle screws, in a manner that allows the spine to be straightened. Usually, at the section desired for fusion, the intervertebral disks are removed and bone graft material is placed to create the fusion. If this is autologous material, the bone is harvested from a hip via a separate incision.


Alternatively, the fusion surgery may be performed anteriorly. A lateral and anterior incision is made for access. Usually, one of the lungs is deflated in order to allow access to the spine from this anterior approach. In a less-invasive version of the anterior procedure, instead of the single long incision, approximately five incisions, each about three to four cm long are made in several of the intercostal spaces (between the ribs) on one side of the patient. In one version of this minimally invasive surgery, tethers and bone screws are placed and are secured to the vertebra on the anterior convex portion of the curve. Currently, clinical trials are being performed which use staples in place of the tether/screw combination. One advantage of this surgery in comparison with the posterior approach is that the scars from the incisions are not as dramatic, though they are still located in a visible area, when a bathing suit, for example, is worn. The staples have had some difficulty in the clinical trials. The staples tend to pull out of the bone when a critical stress level is reached.


In some cases, after surgery, the patient will wear a protective brace for a few months as the fusing process occurs. Once the patient reaches spinal maturity, it is difficult to remove the rods and associated hardware in a subsequent surgery, because the fusion of the vertebra usually incorporates the rods themselves. Standard practice is to leave this implant in for life. With either of these two surgical methods, after fusion, the patient's spine is now straight, but depending on how many vertebra were fused, there are often limitations in the degree of flexibility, both in bending and twisting. As these fused patients mature, the fused section can impart large stresses on the adjacent non-fused vertebra, and often, other problems including pain can occur in these areas, sometimes necessitating further surgery. This tends to be in the lumbar portion of the spine that is prone to problems in aging patients. Many physicians are now interested in fusionless surgery for scoliosis, which may be able to eliminate some of the drawbacks of fusion.


One group of patients in which the spine is especially dynamic is the subset known as Early Onset Scoliosis (EDS), which typically occurs in children before the age of five, and more often in boys than in girls. This is a more rare condition, occurring in only about one or two out of 10,000 children, but can be severe, sometimes affecting the normal development of organs. Because of the fact that the spines of these children will still grow a large amount after treatment, non-fusion distraction devices known as growing rods and a device known as the VEPTR-Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (“Titanium Rib”) have been developed. These devices are typically adjusted approximately every six months, to match the child's growth, until the child is at least eight years old, sometimes until they are 15 years old. Each adjustment requires a surgical incision to access the adjustable portion of the device. Because the patients may receive the device at an age as early as six months old, this treatment requires a large number of surgeries. Because of the multiple surgeries, these patients have a rather high preponderance of infection.


Returning to the AIS patients, the treatment methodology for those with a Cobb angle between 20° and 40° is quite controversial. Many physicians proscribe a brace (for example, the Boston Brace), that the patient must wear on their body and under their clothes 18 to 23 hours a day until they become skeletally mature, for example to age 16. Because these patients are all passing through their socially demanding adolescent years, it is quite a serious prospect to be forced with the choice of either wearing a somewhat bulky brace that covers ITIOR of the upper body, having fusion surgery that may leave large scars and also limit motion or doing nothing and running the risk of becoming disfigured and possibly disabled. It is commonly known that many patients have at times hidden their braces, for example, in a bush outside of school, in order to escape any related embarrassment. The patient compliance with brace wearing has been so problematic that there have been special braces constructed which sense the body of the patient, and keep track of the amount of time per day that the brace is worn. Patients have even been known to place objects into unworn braces of this type in order to fool the sensor. Coupled with the inconsistent patient compliance with brace usage, is a feeling by many physicians that braces, even if used properly, are not at all effective at curing scoliosis. These physicians may agree that bracing can possibly slow down or even temporarily stop curve (Cobb angle) progression, but they have noted that as soon as the treatment period ends and the brace is no longer worn, often the scoliosis rapidly progresses, to a Cobb angle even more severe than it was at the beginning of treatment. Some say the reason for the supposed ineffectiveness of the brace is that it works only on a portion of the torso, and not on the entire spine. Currently a prospective, randomized 500 patient clinical trial known as BrAIST (Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial) is enrolling patients, 50% of whom will be treated with the brace and 50% of who will simply be watched. The Cobb angle data will be measured continually up until skeletal maturity, or until a Cobb angle of 50° is reached, at which time the patient will likely undergo surgery. Many physicians feel that the BrAIST trial will show that braces are completely ineffective. If this is the case, the quandary about what to do with AIS patients who have a Cobb angle of between 20° and 40° will only become more pronounced. It should be noted that the “20° to 40°” patient population is as much as ten times larger than the “40° and greater” patient population.


SUMMARY

In a first embodiment, an external adjustment device includes a support member and first and second cylindrical magnets disposed within a cover and mounted on one side of the support member, the first and second cylindrical magnets mounted on respective shafts passing through the support member and terminating at respective first and second gears disposed on an opposing side of the support member. The external adjustment device includes a pair of handles secured to the support member. A motor is mounted to the support member on a side opposite the first and second cylindrical magnets, the motor configured in a geared arrangement with the first and second gears. The external adjustment device further includes a display configured to visually display information to a user of the external adjustment device.


In a second embodiment, a system includes an external adjustment device and a magnetically shielded storage case. The external adjustment device includes an external adjustment device comprising first and second cylindrical magnets disposed within a cover, the first and second cylindrical magnets rotationally mounted on respective shafts. The external adjustment device also includes a pair of handles, a motor configured to rotate the first and second cylindrical magnets, and a display configured to visually display information to a user of the external adjustment device. The external adjustment device can be stored in a storage case. The storage case may at least partially cover the first and second cylindrical magnets. The storage case may optionally be formed from a material that provides magnetic shielding.


In another embodiment, a method of positioning an external adjustment device relative to a patient having an implanted magnetic assembly includes placing a magnetic viewing sheet adjacent to a patient; identifying the location of an implanted magnetic assembly using the magnetic viewing sheet by visualizing a magnetic image of the implanted magnetic assembly in the magnetic viewing sheet; and placing the external adjustment device on the patient adjacent to the location where the magnetic image was located.


In yet another embodiment, a method of confirming the location of an implanted magnetic assembly includes identifying the general region of the patient where the implanted magnetic assembly is believed to be located; providing an external locating magnet in close proximity to the general region; and moving the external locating magnet around to find the location where the magnetic force is the strongest.


In still another embodiment, a method of confirming the location of an implanted magnetic assembly includes identifying the general region of the patient where the implanted magnetic assembly is believed to be located. An external adjustment device is moved adjacent to the patient in the general region, the external adjustment device comprising a support member having first and second cylindrical magnets disposed on one side thereof and a pair of handles disposed on an opposing side thereof along with a motor configured to rotate the first and second cylindrical magnets, wherein a center of mass of the external adjustment device is located substantially at a base of the pair of handles adjacent to the support member. The location of the implanted magnetic assembly is sensed by detecting magnetic attraction of the external adjustment device toward the patient.


In still another embodiment, an external adjustment device includes a support member having first and second cylindrical magnets disposed on a first side thereof find a pair of handles disposed on an opposing, second side of the support member. A motor is disposed on the second side of the support member and configured to rotate the first and second cylindrical magnets. A microcontroller is disposed on or in the external adjustment device, the microcontroller having contained therein instructions for preventing one or more device operations.


In still another embodiment, a method of confirming die location of fin implanted magnetic assembly includes identifying the general region of the patient where the implanted magnetic assembly is believed to be located and moving an external adjustment device adjacent to the patient in the general region. The external adjustment device includes a support member having first and second cylindrical magnets disposed on one side thereof and separated by a viewing aperture interposed there between, the external adjustment device further comprising a pair of handles disposed on an opposing side thereof along with a motor configured to rotate the first and second cylindrical magnets. The location of the implanted magnetic assembly is identified by moving die external adjustment device in the general region and at least partially viewing the general region through the viewing aperture to identify a lump.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates the spine of a person with scoliosis.



FIG. 2 illustrates the Cobb angle of a scoliotic spine.



FIG. 3 illustrates the large incision made during prior art scoliosis fusion surgery.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary distraction device mounted on the spine of a patient.



FIG. 5 illustrates another exemplary distraction device mounted in a bone of a patient.



FIG. 6 is a top plan view of an external adjustment device according to one embodiment.



FIG. 7 is a rear view of the external adjustment device of FIG. 6.



FIG. 8 is a front view of the external adjustment device of FIG. 6.



FIG. 9 is a bottom plan view of the external adjustment device of FIG. 6.



FIG. 10 is a perspective view of the external adjustment device of FIG. 6.



FIG. 11 is another perspective view of the external adjustment device of FIG. 6. Optional adjustable straps are illustrated.



FIG. 12 is an exploded view of another embodiment of an external adjustment device.



FIG. 13 is a perspective view of a protective case of an external adjustment device.



FIG. 14 illustrates a view of a patient in position for an adjustment procedure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 illustrates a patient 100 with scoliosis. The patient 100 may be a human being or mammalian animal. The concave portion 102 of the spinal curve can be seen on the left side 104 of the patient 100, and the convex portion 106 can be seen on the right side 108 of the patient 100. Of course, in other patients, the concave portion 102 may appear on the right side 108 of the patient 100 while the convex portion 106 may be found on the left side 104 of the patient. In addition, as seen in FIG. 1, some rotation of the spine 110 is present, and unevenness between the left shoulder 112 and right shoulder 114 is seen.



FIG. 2 illustrates the Cobb angle 116 of a spine 110 of a patient with scoliosis. To determine the Cobb angle, lines 118 and 120 are drawn from vertebra 122 and 124, respectively. Intersecting perpendicular lines 126 and 128 are drawn by creating 90° angles 130 and 132 from lines 118 and 120. The angle 116 created from the crossing of the perpendicular lines 126 and 128 is defined as the Cobb angle. In a perfectly straight spine, this angle is 0°.


In many Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients with a Cobb angle of 40° or greater, spinal fusion surgery is typically the first option. FIG. 3 illustrates a long incision 134 formed in the patient 100 which is typically made during posterior scoliosis fusion surgery. This type of fusion surgery is known in the prior art. The long incision 134 extends between an upper end 136 and a lower end 138. The length of this incision 134 is longer than the length of the section of the vertebra to be fused. The actual length between the upper end 136 and the lower end 138 varies, depending on the size of the patient, and the extent of the scoliosis, but in AIS patients this length is significantly longer than 15 cm. More typically, it is longer than 25 cm.



FIG. 4 illustrates a distraction device 200 for treating scoliosis according to one embodiment. The distraction device 200, which is an implantable device, is fixated at its upper end 202 and lower end 204 to the patient's spine 500. The illustrated example of the spine 500 includes the particular thoracic and lumbar vertebrae that typically encompass a scoliotic curve, for example the curve of a patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The T3 through T12 thoracic vertebrae, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, respectively and the L1 through L3 vertebrae, 513, 514, 515 are depicted in FIG. 4, not in a severe scoliotic condition, but in a very slight residual curve that represents a modest curve that has been partially or completely straightened during the implantation procedure.


Each vertebra is different from the other vertebra by its size and shape, with the upper vertebra generally being smaller than the lower vertebra. However, generally, the vertebrae have a similar structure and include a vertebral body 516, a spinous process 518, 520, laminae 526, transverse processes 521, 522 and pedicles 524. In this embodiment, the distraction device 200 includes a distraction rod 206 which is adjustable (lengthwise) via a coupled adjustable portion 208. The distraction device 200 is fixated to the spine 500 via a clamp 600 at the upper end 202 of the distraction rod 206. In FIG. 4, the clamp 600 is secured around the transverse process 521 of the T4 vertebra 504. Alternatively, the clamp 600 may be secured around an adjacent rib (not shown) or rib facet. In still another alternative, the clamp may be replaced by a laminar and pedicle hook system, or pedicle screw system. Exemplary pedicle hook systems or pedicle screw systems may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/121,355 and 12/250,442 which are incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.


Referring back to FIG. 4, the distraction device 200 is illustrated as being fixated to the spine 500 with a pedicle screw system 531 comprising a connecting rod 532 and two toe clamps 538, 540. The connecting rod 532 is shown curving back on itself in the shape of a “J.” The connecting rod 532 then interfaces with the adjustable portion 208. The adjustable portion 208 of the distraction device 200 contains a magnetic assembly 210 (illustrated in dashed lines) having a permanent magnet configured to drive a lead screw that, depending on the direction of rotation of the internal magnet, will extend or retract the distraction rod 206 using the adjustable portion 208. Lengthening of the distraction rod 206, for example, will impart a distraction force to the spine 500. Retracting the distraction rod 206 will lower or remove the distraction force on the spine 500, for example if too high a distraction force causes pain or complications. It may even be desired to use the device to compress the spine or bone, for example at an anterior portion of the spine or at the convex portion of a curve. Examples of various magnetic assemblies 210 for use in distraction devices 200 may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/121,355 and 12/250,442.


Still referring to FIG. 4, a locking screw 534 can be loosened to adjust the angle of the connecting rod 532 into the desired orientation and then locking screw 534 can be tightened so that toe clamp 538 securely holds connecting rod 532 in place without further rotation. The second toe clamp 540 is adjusted in the same way, by tightening locking screw 536. Because a scoliotic spine is also rotated (usually the center section is rotated to the right in AIS patients), the non-fusion embodiment presented here allows de-rotation of the spine 500 to happen naturally, because there is no fixation at the middle portion of the distraction device 200.


In order to further facilitate this de-rotation, the distraction device 200 may allow for free rotation at its ends. For example, the adjustable portion 208 may be coupled to the connecting rod 532 via an articulating joint. U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/121,355 and 12/250,442 describe various articulating interfaces and joints that may be utilized to couple the adjustable portion 108 to the connecting rod 532 or the like.


It should be noted that distraction rod 206 may be precurved with the typical shape of a normal saggital spine, but it should also be noted that the curve may be slightly different than standard scoliosis fusion instrumentation, because in the non-fusion embodiment described herein, the distraction device 200 is not flush with the spine but rather is placed either subcutaneous or sub-fascial, and thus is not below the back muscles. The only portions of the distraction device 200 that are designed to be placed below the muscles are the clamp 600 and the portion of the distraction rod 206 immediately adjacent the clamp 600, the pedicle screw system 531 and the connecting rod 532. Thus, FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment in which the bulk of the hardware associated with the distraction device 200 is placed over the muscle. It should be understood, however, that in alternative configurations, any other part of the entire implantable embodiment may be placed under the muscle (i.e., sub-muscular). It should be appreciated that a much smaller amount of muscle needs to be dissected during the procedure in comparison with current fusion procedures. This will allow for a much shorter procedure, much less blood loss, much quicker recovery, and less time in the hospital/less risk of infection. Further, it may be desirable to produce the “J” curve of the connecting rod 532 or any other curve at the connecting rod 532 with optional flanges or ribs at their highest stress points in order to increase their durability in demanding implant conditions.



FIG. 5 illustrates a bone growth distraction device 272 that is attached to bone 256 having a proximal portion 258 and a distal portion 260 by a proximal securement member 276 and a distal securement member 278. The securement members 276, 278 may operate using any number of securement devices or methods known to attach a device to bone, including screws, clamps or even adhesive materials. In cases of a bone fracture, a fracture site 274 is illustrated, though it should be noted that this fracture is not always present in some of the applications. As seen in FIG. 5, the bone growth distraction device 272 includes a magnetic assembly 210 that includes a cylindrical magnet 262 that is configured to rotate on its axis in response to an externally applied magnetic field. Rotation of the cylindrical magnet 262 effectuates rotation of a planetary gear set 266. An optional slip clutch 264 is illustrated as being disposed between the cylindrical magnet 262 and the planetary gear set 266, though slip clutch 264 may be disposed at any other location along the drive transmission. Rotation of the planetary gear set 266 in a first direction (e.g., either clockwise or counter-clockwise depending on configuration) causes lead screw 268 to turn within internal thread 270 causing distraction (e.g., elongation) of the bone 256. Bone growth distraction device 272 may be implanted in a single operation. Subsequent adjustments tire performed non-invasively, and if desired can be performed frequently in order to precisely control bone growth. An exemplary daily adjustment in bone distraction is 1 mm. An adjustment device such as external adjustment device 700 described herein may be used to rotate the cylindrical magnet 262. An external adjustment device 700 of the type described herein may also be used to distract and retract the distraction device 200 illustrated in FIG. 4 by magnetic coupling to its magnetic assembly 210.



FIGS. 6-12 illustrate various views of an external adjustment device 700. The external adjustment device 700 is configured to remotely drive and control foe magnetic assembly 210 of the distraction devices (e.g., distraction devices 200, 272). The external adjustment device 700 includes a left handle 702 and a right handle 704 that are affixed to a support member 730. In one particular aspect, the support member 730 may take the form of a base or plate. The handles 702, 704 permit a user to hold and manipulate the external adjustment device 700. The external adjustment device 700 includes two external magnets 706, 708 located on an opposing side of foe support member 730. The two external magnets 706, 708 may be housed within a cover or casing as illustrated by cover 746 in FIG. 12. In this regard, the magnets 706, 708 are able to rotate within the cover 746 that separates the magnets 706, 708 from the external environment. Preferably, the cover 746 is rigid and relatively thin walled at least at the portion directly covering the permanent magnets 706, 708, in order to minimize the gap between the permanent magnets 706, 708 and the magnetic assembly 210. The two external magnets 706, 708 may be made from rare earth magnets such as, for instance, Neodymium-Iron-Boron (NdFeB) although other rare earth magnets are also possible. Each magnet 706, 708 may have a length of around 1.5 incites and a diameter of around 1.0 to 3.5 inches. Both magnets 706, 708 are diametrically magnetized (poles are perpendicular the long axis of each permanent magnet 706, 708).


The external adjustment device 700 includes a motor 705 that is contained within a motor cover 712. Optionally, a power cord 711 is operatively coupled to the motor 705 to provide a source of power. The power source may include a direct current (DC) source or it may include an alternating current (AC) source. The external adjustment device 700 may even operate primarily on one source (e.g., AC) but have the ability to switch to a back-up power source (e.g., DC batteries) in the event of a power failure or other interruption.


The external adjustment device 700 includes two push buttons 722, 724. Distraction button 722 is operated with the right thumb, for example, while still holding the right handle 704, and causes the external magnets 706, 708 to turn in the direction that causes distraction of the implanted distraction device. Distraction button 722 is optionally labeled with distraction symbol 717. Retraction button 724 is operated with the left thumb, for example while still holding the left handle 702, and causes the external magnets 706, 708 to turn in the opposite direction, that causing retraction of the implanted distraction device. Retraction button 724 is optionally labeled with retraction symbol 719. For example, if too much distraction is applied, the retraction button 724 may be pushed to reverse the undesired amount of distraction. The motor 705 may rotate the magnets 706, 708 at a faster speed, for example, when in retraction mode than in distraction mode, so that the distraction operation may be more precise, and the retraction (for example during an emergency situation) may be more immediate. The difference in speeds may be achieved by a multi-speed motor 705 or by gearing and the like. It may be desired that if both of the buttons 722, 724 are pressed at the same time, the external adjustment device 700 shuts off or does not operate.


As seen in FIGS. 6, 7, and 10-12, a display 715 is provided on the external adjustment device 700 which allows the user to visualize information, such as the current state of the distraction device 200, 272, the amount of distraction length desired or achieved, the rate of change of the distraction length, the rotational speed of the cylindrical magnets 706, 708, or distraction force. The display 715 advantageously provides information feedback to the user prior to, during, or after adjusting the particular distraction device within the patient 100. The display 715 may also be coupled with an auditory or even tactile cue (e.g., vibrations) to add further functionality.


Still referring to FIG. 6, the two magnets 706, 708 are separated from one another. An alignment window 716 is formed between the left post 718 and the right post 720 which is an opening or aperture to directly view placement of the external adjustment device 700 against the patient 100. During use, the operator can actually “see through” this window to better align the external adjustment device 700 with the patient. For example, a lump may be seen on the skin of the patient 100 where the magnetic assembly 210 of the distraction device 200 is implanted. FIG. 7 illustrates a rear view of the external adjustment device 700 while FIG. 8 illustrates a front view of the external adjustment device 700. A bottom view of the external adjustment device 700 is provided in FIG. 9 while FIGS. 10 and 11 illustrate different perspective views of the external adjustment device 700.


The motor 705 of the external adjustment device 700 may turn the cylindrical magnets 706, 708 using the belt/pulley system disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/121,355 and 12/250,442. FIG. 12, however, illustrates an alternative drive system that uses a series of gears 736, 738, 740, 754, 756. As seen in FIG. 12, the external adjustment device 700 contains two magnets 706, 708, which are cylindrical in shape and made from rare earth magnets as described herein. The magnets 706, 708 may be diametrically magnetized. The magnets 706, 708 are bonded or attached by other means within magnetic cups 732. The magnetic cups 732 include respective shafts 734 (only one of which can be seen in FIG. 12) which are attached, respectively, to a first magnet gear 736 and a second magnet gear 738. The orientation of the poles of each the two magnets 706, 708 are maintained in relation to each other by means of the gearing system by use of center gear 740, which meshes with both first magnet gear 736 and second magnet gear 738. For example, it may be desired that the south pole of one of the magnets 706 is facing up whenever the south pole of the other magnet 708 is facing down. This arrangement, for instance, maximizes the torque that can be placed on the magnetic assembly 210 of the particular distraction device 200, 272.


Still referring to FIG. 12, the magnets 706, 708 are held between a support member 730 and a front plate 742. On the backside of the external adjustment device 700, a cover or housing 744 contains the motor 705 and gears 736, 738, 740, 754, 756. The magnets 706, 708 rotate within a static magnet cover 746, so that tire external adjustment device 700 may be rested directly on the patient 100, while not imparting any motion to the external surfaces of the patient 100. Prior to distracting the distraction device (e.g., spinal, bone, or other) the operator places the external adjustment device 700 over the patient 100 near the location of the implanted magnetic assembly 210. A magnet standoff 748 contains a viewing window 750, analogous to alignment window 716 of FIG. 6, to aid in the placement. To perform a distraction operation, the operator holds the external adjustment device 700 by its handles 702, 704 and depresses a distract switch 722, causing motor 705 to drive in a first direction. The motor 705 has a gear box 752 which causes the rotational speed of an output gear 754 disposed on a shaft (not shown) to be different from the rotational speed of the motor 705 (for example, a slower speed). The output gear 754 then turns a reduction gear 756 which meshes with center gear 740, causing it to turn at a different rotational speed than the reduction gear 756. The center gear 740 meshes with both the first magnet gear 736 and the second magnet gear 738 turning both at a rate which is identical to each other. Depending on the particular location on the patient 100 where the magnets 706, 708 of the external adjustment device 700 are located, it is desired that this rate be controlled, to minimize the current density though the tissues and fluids of the body.


For example a rotational speed of 35 RPM or less for the magnets 706, 708 is contemplated to keep current densities at a desirable level. At any time, the distraction may b lessened by depressing the retraction button 724. For example, if the patient feels significant pain, or numbness in the area being lengthened, the operator can depress retraction button 724 to reverse the distraction operation. FIG. 12 illustrates a rechargeable battery 758 that may optionally be employed to supply power to the external adjustment device 700. As explained herein, the external adjustment device 700 may be alternatively powered using power cord 711. The rechargeable battery 758 may also be an emergency power source in the event that conventional AC power is unavailable.


Still referring, to FIG. 12, the on and off commands to the motor 705 are achieved by a first micro-relay 760 located on a circuit board 762. The directional (clockwise/counterclockwise) commands to the motor are achieved by a second micro-relay 764, also located on the circuit board 762. A microcontroller 766 allows the mechanical inputs to the distraction button 722 and retraction button 724 to operate the rotation of the magnets 706, 708 by means of the micro-relays 760 and 764. A control panel 770 having the display 715 and input buttons 772 is shown on top of the external adjustment device 700. Inputs to the external adjustment device 700 may be achieved by using the input buttons 772, or by using a GUI (graphical user interface) which is a feature of the display 715. The microcontroller 766 may loaded with software that locks-out or prevents over distraction of the device 200, 272. The microcontroller may also receive inputs to the external adjustment device 700 via the input buttons 772 or GUI on the display 715 (e.g., through touch-screen, mouse-like device, buttons, etc). The board 762, microcontroller 766 and micro-relays 760, 764 can all be contained within the housing 744, or even as a part of the control panel 770.


Alternatively, as illustrated in FIG. 13, a separate programmable logic controller (PLC) 780 can be used, and may be located in a different enclosure 782 which contains a display 784 and input buttons 786. Still referring to FIG. 13, the external adjustment device 700 in this embodiment includes a power supply 788 stored and protected inside a storage case 790 having a closable lid 792. There is enough padding at the bottom, sides and top of the storage case 790 so that the powerful cylindrical magnets 706, 708 are sufficiently spaced apart from the external walls of the storage case 790, so that when the storage case 790 has its lid 792 closed, the magnetic field 3i the external walls of the storage case 790 are small enough so that they will not cause damage to electrical equipment or significantly attract metal objects. This way, magnet safety can be easily practiced. Preferably, the distance is controlled so that the magnetic field strength is less than 0.002 Gauss at a distance of 2.1 meters from any point on the external surface of the storage case 790 in order to not be considered “Magnetic Material” by International Air Transport Association (IATA) regulations. Alternatively, shielding material, such as mu-metal (a nickel-iron alloy of about 75% nickel, 15% iron, plus copper and molybdenum) may be used in the wall of the storage case 790. In this embodiment, the cylindrical magnets 706, 708 may be mechanically uncoupled from the strong attraction shielding material using a clip(s), un-fastener(s), release(s), prying wedge(s), or the like.


The external adjustment device 700 may be used by healthcare personnel at an outpatient facility, physician's office or the like. Alternatively, the external adjustment device 700 may be used by family members within the home of the patient 100. The microcontroller 766 or PLC 780 have the capability of allowing the physician to program in limits so that the patient cannot be, for example, over-distracted by operator error, mistake, or misuse. The physician may also create commands that are read on the display by the family members. For example, “distract 1 mm today” may be visible to the operator via the display 715. The ability to program in limits of this sort, or other commands is password protected, so that it cannot be changed by unauthorized persons. For example, while the external adjustment device 700 may be capable of performing any number of operations (e.g., unlimited distraction or multiple distractions over a small period of time), the microcontroller 766 or PLC 780 may be set by the physician to allow only certain commands when the external adjustment device 700 is used in a home setting. For example, the total distraction length in any particular use may be limited. This pre-set distance may be stored in the microcontroller 766 or PLC 780. As still another example, distraction intervals may be set in the external adjustment device 700 (e.g., adjustment permitted only alter a few weeks have passed since last distraction) to ensure patient safety during home use. This pre-set time may be stored in the microcontroller 766 or PLC 780. In this regard, the microcontroller 766 or PLC 780 may have an internal clock that can be used to determine the elapsed time between distraction events. The microcontroller 766 or PLC 780 may also be programmed to completely lockout users if improper use is detected. For example, excessive use of the retraction button 724 may cause the microcontroller 766 or PLC 780 to lockout the at home user until the external adjustment device 700 is returned to the physician's office.


Additionally, the external adjustment device 700 may be connected either through a wired (e.g., USB or other network cable) or wireless connection to a remote office network, for example, allowing the physician to reprogram the device without the patient 100 having to bring the external adjustment device 700 into the office. For example, the external adjustment device 700 could use the modem of a separate personal computer to transmit and receive data between the device 700 and a remote network location. In this regard, the physician is also able to download data from the device 700. Certain features of the external adjustment device 700 may be turned on or off remotely using such a connection. The patient 100 may also have an implanted RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) chip that allows in the information to be read and written directly to the RFID chip. For example, patient demographics, implant length, distraction amount, distraction force, time, date, and the like may be stored on the RFID chip.


When the patient 100 is having his or her spine distraction performed, they may lie prone, and may even have a pillow, pad, roll or shaped convex v-block below their torso, in order to further aid in the distraction of the spine, or lower the requirement of the distraction force (or magnet torque) that needs to be achieved. Though it has been described that lengthening procedures for the spine occur when the patient is lying prone, the patient may also be in a standing position or hanging, for example by the shoulders. This latter arrangement adds some traction to the spine, thus aiding the distraction. Full traction may even be employed. Alternatively, the patient 100 may be silting while the adjustment is done, and the external adjustment device 700 may also be built into a chair or seat or configured to be removably secured to a chair or seat. For example the magnets 706, 708 may protrude from the backrest, with their axes aligned vertically. The patient simply sits down and leans back against the magnet cover 746.


When used in conjunction with a limb lengthening device 272 such as that illustrated in FIG. 5, the external adjustment device 700 may have one or more adjustable straps 794 as illustrated in FIG. 11 that hold the external adjustment device 700 it to the limb. The straps 794 could include a material such as VELCRO or the like to permit easy adjustment. Alternatively, a conventional type buckle may be used to secure the straps 794 around the particular limb of the patient 100.


Referring to FIG. 14, an exemplary method and apparatus for determining the location of an implanted magnet in a patient 100 is described. As seen in FIG. 14, a piece of magnetic viewing sheet 800 is used to view the orientation of the magnetic fields. The areas of high magnetic intensity appear dark, while the transition zones (areas where the poles are changing, also known as the neutral zone) appear light. In other words, the magnetic viewing sheet 800 turns dark when the field lines are perpendicular to the surface, and it turns light when the field lines are horizontal, i.e., across the surface. If a magnet is placed under it, as would the case be when the sheet 800 is placed over the patient 100 having an implanted distraction device with a magnetic assembly 210, with one of the poles facing the film, it will show the magnet as dark with a light outline. The magnetic viewing sheet 800 is a translucent sheet that has small particles of a ferromagnetic material suspended in the cells of the sheet. The magnetic viewing sheet 800 may be made of a polymer material or even paper products (e.g., wood-based materials) with ferromagnetic material embedded therein.


In FIG. 14, a patient 100 lies, for example in a prone position and the medical personnel (or family member) who will perform the adjustment places the magnetic viewing sheet 800 on the surface of the patient's skin or clothes and moves the sheet 800 until the magnetic field from the magnetic assembly 210 of the distraction device is identified. The skin or clothes may be marked, or the magnetic viewing sheet 800 may simply be left in place as a visual indicator. Turning to FIG. 6, the alignment window 716 located between left post 718 and right post 720 of the external adjustment device 700 is centered over the indicated location of the magnetic assembly 210 and the external adjustment device 700 is held by grasping the left handle 702 with the left hand and the right handle 704 with the right hand. Because the axial center of mass 714 of the external adjustment device 700 is located substantially at the base of each of the two handles 702, 704, in most non-obese patients, the attraction between the left and right cylindrical magnets 706, 708 and the magnetic assembly 210 can be sensed by the hands. In particular, the hands can sense the magnetic pull or attractive force between the magnetic assembly 210 and the cylindrical magnets 706, 708. Therefore, the magnetic assembly 210 can also be located without the use of magnetic viewing sheet 800. In any patient 100, but especially in obese patients, the external adjustment device 700 can be pressed down with a firm, though not painful, force in order to compress fat and other tissue and thus to decrease the distance between the left and right cylindrical magnets 706, 708 and the magnetic assembly 210. This will increase the maximum torque that can be delivered to the magnetic assembly 210, and thus the distraction three that can be applied.


As an alternative to placing the magnetic viewing sheet 800 or using the balance feature of the external adjustment device 700, a locating magnet 802 may be placed against the skin or clothing of the patient 100. The locating magnet 802 will be most attracted or, alternatively, repulsed to the area near the magnetic assembly 210, and thus give an indication of its location and orientation.


While embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the inventive concepts disclosed herein. The invention(s), therefore, should not be limited, except to the following claims, and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An external adjustment device comprising: at least one magnet configured to generate a changing magnetic field;a bidirectional control configured to effect a change in the magnetic field by causing rotation of the at least one magnet in a first direction or a second direction;a motor configured to rotate the at least one magnet;a drive system operatively coupled to the at least one magnet, the drive system configured to translate rotation of the motor into rotation of the at least one magnet; anda microcontroller configured to communicate with at least one of the at least one magnet, the drive system, or the at least one bidirectional control and thereby to cause the changing magnetic field to change, wherein the microcontroller is also configured to prevent change of the changing magnetic field in response to one or more pre-determined criteria being met.
  • 2. The external adjustment device of claim 1, further comprising: a housing surrounding the at least one magnet; andat least one handle coupled to the housing.
  • 3. The external adjustment device of claim 2, further comprising: a display attached to the housing and configured to communicate information to a user.
  • 4. The external adjustment device of claim 3, wherein the display is configured to provide information feedback to the user at least one of prior to, during, or after a use of the external adjustment device.
  • 5. The external adjustment device of claim 3, wherein the information communicated to the user includes a current state of an implanted medical device.
  • 6. The external adjustment device of claim 3, wherein the information communicated to the user includes an amount of change in at least one of a dimension of an implanted medical device or a force on the implanted medical device.
  • 7. The external adjustment device of claim 3, wherein the information communicated to the user includes a rate of change in at least one of a dimension of an implanted medical device or a force on the implanted medical device.
  • 8. The external adjustment device of claim 3, wherein the information communicated to the user includes a rate of change of the changing magnetic field of the external adjustment device.
  • 9. The external adjustment device of claim 3, wherein the information communicated to the user includes at least one of an amount of adjustment desired for an implanted medical device or an amount of adjustment achieved by the implanted medical device.
  • 10. The external adjustment device of claim 1, wherein the at least one magnet includes a first magnet configured for rotation about a first axis and a second magnet configured for rotation about a second axis.
  • 11. The external adjustment device of claim 1, further comprising: a data connection configured to allow a transfer of information between the external adjustment device and a network,wherein the transfer of information comprises at least one of a transfer of the at least one pre-determined criteria of the one or more predetermined criteria from the network to the external adjustment device and a transfer of data corresponding to a use of the external adjustment device from the external adjustment device to the network.
  • 12. An external adjustment device for non-invasively adjusting a dimension of an implant, the external adjustment device comprising: a housing containing: at least one magnet configured to generate a changing magnetic field; anda bidirectional control configured to effect a change in the magnetic field by causing rotation of the at least one magnet in a first direction to increase the dimension of the implant or a second direction to decrease the dimension of the implant; anda display attached to the housing and configured to communicate information to a user.
  • 13. The external adjustment device of claim 12, further comprising: a motor configured to rotate the at least one magnet, wherein the motor is configured to rotate the at least one magnet at a faster speed in a retraction mode than in a distraction mode.
  • 14. The external adjustment device of claim 13, further comprising: a drive system operatively coupled to the at least one magnet, the drive system configured to translate rotation of the motor into rotation of the at least one magnet; anda microcontroller configured to communicate with at least one of the at least one magnet, the drive system, and the at least one directional control and thereby to cause the changing magnetic field to change, and wherein the microcontroller is also configured to prevent change of the changing magnetic field in response to one or more pre-determined criteria being met.
  • 15. The external adjustment device of claim 12, wherein the display is configured to provide information feedback to the user at least one of prior to, during, or after a use of the external adjustment device.
  • 16. The external adjustment device of claim 15, wherein the information communicated to the user includes at least one of: a) a current state of an implanted medical device,b) an amount of change in at least one of a dimension of the implanted medical device or a force on the implanted medical device,c) a rate of change in at least one of the dimension of an implanted medical device or the force on the implanted medical device,d) a rate of change of the changing magnetic field of the external adjustment device, ore) an amount of adjustment desired for the implanted medical device or an amount of adjustment achieved by the implanted medical device.
  • 17. An external adjustment device comprising: at least one magnet configured to generate a changing magnetic field;a bidirectional control configured to effect a change in the magnetic field by causing rotation of the at least one magnet in a first direction or a second direction;a microcontroller configured to communicate with the bidirectional control and thereby cause the changing magnetic field to change; anda display at a housing of the external adjustment device for communicating information to a user.
  • 18. The external adjustment device of claim 17, wherein the microcontroller is configured to prevent change of the changing magnetic field in response to one or more pre-determined criteria being met.
  • 19. The external adjustment device of claim 18, wherein the one or more pre-determined criteria includes distraction beyond a pre-set distance.
  • 20. The external adjustment device of claim 17, wherein the display is integral to the housing, and wherein the microcontroller is configured to instruct the bidirectional control to rotate the at least one magnet at a faster speed in a retraction mode than in a distraction mode such that distraction operation of the external adjustment device is more precise than retraction operation of the external adjustment device.
US Referenced Citations (561)
Number Name Date Kind
2702031 Leslie Feb 1955 A
3111945 Von Nov 1963 A
3372476 Richard Mar 1968 A
3377576 Edwin Apr 1968 A
3512901 Law May 1970 A
3597781 Eibes Aug 1971 A
3810259 Summers May 1974 A
3900025 Barnes, Jr. Aug 1975 A
3915151 Kraus Oct 1975 A
RE28907 Eibes et al. Jul 1976 E
3976060 Hildebrandt et al. Aug 1976 A
4010758 Rockland et al. Mar 1977 A
4056743 Clifford et al. Nov 1977 A
4068821 Morrison Jan 1978 A
4078559 Nissinen Mar 1978 A
4204541 Kapitanov May 1980 A
4357946 Dutcher et al. Nov 1982 A
4386603 Mayfield Jun 1983 A
4448191 Rodnyansky et al. May 1984 A
4486176 Tardieu et al. Dec 1984 A
4501266 McDaniel Feb 1985 A
4522501 Shannon Jun 1985 A
4537520 Ochiai et al. Aug 1985 A
4550279 Klein Oct 1985 A
4561798 Elcrin et al. Dec 1985 A
4573454 Hoffman Mar 1986 A
4592355 Antebi Jun 1986 A
4595007 Mericle Jun 1986 A
4642257 Chase Feb 1987 A
4658809 Ulrich et al. Apr 1987 A
4700091 Wuthrich Oct 1987 A
4747832 Buffet May 1988 A
4854304 Zielke Aug 1989 A
4904861 Epstein et al. Feb 1990 A
4931055 Bumpus et al. Jun 1990 A
4940467 Tronzo Jul 1990 A
4957495 Kluger Sep 1990 A
4973331 Pursley et al. Nov 1990 A
5010879 Moriya et al. Apr 1991 A
5030235 Campbell, Jr. Jul 1991 A
5041112 Mingozzi et al. Aug 1991 A
5064004 Lundell Nov 1991 A
5074882 Grammont et al. Dec 1991 A
5092889 Campbell, Jr. Mar 1992 A
5133716 Plaza Jul 1992 A
5142407 Varaprasad et al. Aug 1992 A
5156605 Pursley et al. Oct 1992 A
5261908 Campbell, Jr. Nov 1993 A
5263955 Baumgart et al. Nov 1993 A
5290289 Sanders et al. Mar 1994 A
5306275 Bryan Apr 1994 A
5330503 Yoon Jul 1994 A
5334202 Carter Aug 1994 A
5336223 Rogers Aug 1994 A
5356411 Spievack Oct 1994 A
5356424 Buzerak et al. Oct 1994 A
5364396 Robinson et al. Nov 1994 A
5403322 Herzenberg et al. Apr 1995 A
5429638 Muschler et al. Jul 1995 A
5437266 McPherson et al. Aug 1995 A
5466261 Richelsoph Nov 1995 A
5468030 Walling Nov 1995 A
5480437 Draenert Jan 1996 A
5509888 Miller Apr 1996 A
5516335 Kummer et al. May 1996 A
5527309 Shelton Jun 1996 A
5536269 Spievack Jul 1996 A
5549610 Russell et al. Aug 1996 A
5573012 McEwan Nov 1996 A
5575790 Chen et al. Nov 1996 A
5582616 Bolduc et al. Dec 1996 A
5595563 Moisdon Jan 1997 A
5620445 Brosnahan et al. Apr 1997 A
5620449 Faccioli et al. Apr 1997 A
5626579 Muschler et al. May 1997 A
5626613 Schmieding May 1997 A
5632744 Campbell, Jr. May 1997 A
5659217 Petersen Aug 1997 A
5662683 Kay Sep 1997 A
5672175 Martin Sep 1997 A
5672177 Seldin Sep 1997 A
5700263 Schendel Dec 1997 A
5704938 Staehlin et al. Jan 1998 A
5704939 Justin Jan 1998 A
5720746 Soubeiran Feb 1998 A
5743910 Bays et al. Apr 1998 A
5762599 Sohn Jun 1998 A
5771903 Jakobsson Jun 1998 A
5800434 Campbell, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5810815 Morales Sep 1998 A
5827286 Incavo et al. Oct 1998 A
5830221 Stein et al. Nov 1998 A
5879375 Larson, Jr. et al. Mar 1999 A
5902304 Walker et al. May 1999 A
5935127 Border Aug 1999 A
5945762 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5961553 Coty et al. Oct 1999 A
5976138 Baumgart et al. Nov 1999 A
5979456 Magovern Nov 1999 A
6022349 McLeod et al. Feb 2000 A
6033412 Losken et al. Mar 2000 A
6034296 Elvin et al. Mar 2000 A
6102922 Jakobsson et al. Aug 2000 A
6106525 Sachse Aug 2000 A
6126660 Dietz Oct 2000 A
6126661 Faccioli et al. Oct 2000 A
6138681 Chen et al. Oct 2000 A
6139316 Sachdeva et al. Oct 2000 A
6162223 Orsak et al. Dec 2000 A
6183476 Gerhardt et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200317 Aalsma et al. Mar 2001 B1
6234956 He et al. May 2001 B1
6241730 Alby Jun 2001 B1
6245075 Betz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6315784 Djurovic Nov 2001 B1
6319255 Grundei et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331744 Chen et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336929 Justin Jan 2002 B1
6343568 McClasky Feb 2002 B1
6358283 Hogfors et al. Mar 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389187 Greenaway et al. May 2002 B1
6400980 Lemelson Jun 2002 B1
6402753 Cole et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409175 Evans et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416516 Stauch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417750 Sohn Jul 2002 B1
6499907 Baur Dec 2002 B1
6500110 Davey et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508820 Bales Jan 2003 B2
6510345 Van Bentem Jan 2003 B1
6537196 Creighton, IV et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554831 Rivard et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565573 Ferrante et al. May 2003 B1
6565576 Stauch et al. May 2003 B1
6582313 Perrow Jun 2003 B2
6583630 Mendes et al. Jun 2003 B2
6616669 Ogilvie et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626917 Craig Sep 2003 B1
6656135 Zogbi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6656194 Gannoe et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667725 Simons et al. Dec 2003 B1
6673079 Kane Jan 2004 B1
6702816 Buhler Mar 2004 B2
6706042 Taylor Mar 2004 B2
6709293 Mori et al. Mar 2004 B2
6730087 Butsch May 2004 B1
6761503 Breese Jul 2004 B2
6765330 Baur Jul 2004 B2
6769499 Cargill et al. Aug 2004 B2
6789442 Forch Sep 2004 B2
6796984 Soubeiran Sep 2004 B2
6802844 Ferree Oct 2004 B2
6809434 Duncan et al. Oct 2004 B1
6835207 Zacouto et al. Dec 2004 B2
6849076 Blunn et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852113 Nathanson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6918838 Schwarzler et al. Jul 2005 B2
6918910 Smith et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921400 Sohngen Jul 2005 B2
6923951 Contag et al. Aug 2005 B2
6971143 Domroese Dec 2005 B2
7001346 White Feb 2006 B2
7008425 Phillips Mar 2006 B2
7011658 Young Mar 2006 B2
7029472 Fortin Apr 2006 B1
7029475 Panjabi Apr 2006 B2
7041105 Michelson May 2006 B2
7060080 Bachmann Jun 2006 B2
7063706 Wittenstein Jun 2006 B2
7105029 Doubler et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105968 Nissen Sep 2006 B2
7114501 Johnson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115129 Heggeness Oct 2006 B2
7135022 Kosashvili et al. Nov 2006 B2
7160312 Saadat Jan 2007 B2
7163538 Altarac et al. Jan 2007 B2
7189005 Ward Mar 2007 B2
7191007 Desai et al. Mar 2007 B2
7218232 DiSilvestro et al. May 2007 B2
7238191 Bachmann Jul 2007 B2
7241300 Sharkawy et al. Jul 2007 B2
7243719 Baron et al. Jul 2007 B2
7255682 Bartol, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B1
7282023 Frering Oct 2007 B2
7285087 Moaddeb et al. Oct 2007 B2
7302015 Kim et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302858 Walsh et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314443 Jordan et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333013 Berger Feb 2008 B2
7357037 Hnat et al. Apr 2008 B2
7357635 Belfor et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360542 Nelson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7390007 Helms et al. Jun 2008 B2
7390294 Hassler, Jr. Jun 2008 B2
7402134 Moaddeb et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402176 Malek Jul 2008 B2
7429259 Cadeddu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7445010 Kugler et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458981 Fielding et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485149 White Feb 2009 B1
7489495 Stevenson Feb 2009 B2
7530981 Kutsenko May 2009 B2
7531002 Sutton et al. May 2009 B2
7553298 Hunt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561916 Hunt et al. Jul 2009 B2
7601156 Robinson Oct 2009 B2
7611526 Carl et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618435 Opolski Nov 2009 B2
7658754 Zhang et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666184 Stauch Feb 2010 B2
7666210 Franck et al. Feb 2010 B2
7678136 Doubler et al. Mar 2010 B2
7678139 Garamszegi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7708737 Kraft et al. May 2010 B2
7708762 McCarthy et al. May 2010 B2
7727143 Birk et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753913 Szakelyhidi, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 B2
7753915 Eksler et al. Jul 2010 B1
7762998 Birk et al. Jul 2010 B2
7763053 Gordon Jul 2010 B2
7763080 Southworth Jul 2010 B2
7766855 Miethke Aug 2010 B2
7775215 Hassler, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776068 Ainsworth et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776075 Bruneau et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776091 Mastrorio et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787958 Stevenson Aug 2010 B2
7794476 Wisnewski Sep 2010 B2
7811328 Molz, IV et al. Oct 2010 B2
7835779 Anderson et al. Nov 2010 B2
7837691 Cordes et al. Nov 2010 B2
7862502 Pool et al. Jan 2011 B2
7862586 Malek Jan 2011 B2
7867235 Fell et al. Jan 2011 B2
7875033 Richter et al. Jan 2011 B2
7887566 Hynes Feb 2011 B2
7901381 Birk et al. Mar 2011 B2
7909852 Boomer et al. Mar 2011 B2
7918844 Byrum et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938841 Sharkawy et al. May 2011 B2
7985256 Grotz et al. Jul 2011 B2
7988709 Clark et al. Aug 2011 B2
8002809 Baynham Aug 2011 B2
8011308 Picchio Sep 2011 B2
8034080 Malandain et al. Oct 2011 B2
8043290 Harrison Oct 2011 B2
8043299 Conway Oct 2011 B2
8043338 Dant Oct 2011 B2
8057473 Orsak et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057513 Kohm et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083741 Morgan et al. Dec 2011 B2
8092499 Roth Jan 2012 B1
8095317 Ekseth et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105360 Connor Jan 2012 B1
8105363 Fielding et al. Jan 2012 B2
8114158 Carl et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123805 Makower et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133280 Voellmicke et al. Mar 2012 B2
8137349 Soubeiran Mar 2012 B2
8147517 Trieu et al. Apr 2012 B2
8147549 Metcalf, Jr. et al. Apr 2012 B2
8162897 Byrum Apr 2012 B2
8162979 Sachs et al. Apr 2012 B2
8177789 Magill et al. May 2012 B2
8197490 Pool et al. Jun 2012 B2
8211149 Justis Jul 2012 B2
8211151 Schwab et al. Jul 2012 B2
8211179 Molz, IV et al. Jul 2012 B2
8216275 Fielding et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221420 Keller Jul 2012 B2
8226690 Altarac et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236002 Fortin et al. Aug 2012 B2
8241331 Arnin Aug 2012 B2
8246630 Manzi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8252063 Stauch Aug 2012 B2
8267969 Altarac et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278941 Kroh et al. Oct 2012 B2
8282671 Connor Oct 2012 B2
8298240 Giger et al. Oct 2012 B2
8323290 Metzger et al. Dec 2012 B2
8357182 Seme Jan 2013 B2
8366628 Denker et al. Feb 2013 B2
8372078 Collazo Feb 2013 B2
8382756 Pool et al. Feb 2013 B2
8386018 Stauch et al. Feb 2013 B2
8394124 Biyani Mar 2013 B2
8403958 Schwab Mar 2013 B2
8414584 Brigido Apr 2013 B2
8419801 DiSilvestro et al. Apr 2013 B2
8425608 Dewey et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435268 Thompson et al. May 2013 B2
8439915 Harrison et al. May 2013 B2
8439926 Bojarski et al. May 2013 B2
8444693 Reiley May 2013 B2
8469908 Asfora Jun 2013 B2
8470004 Reiley Jun 2013 B2
8486070 Morgan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486076 Chavarria et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486110 Fielding et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486147 De Villiers et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494805 Roche et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496662 Novak et al. Jul 2013 B2
8518062 Cole et al. Aug 2013 B2
8523866 Sidebotham et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529474 Gupta et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529606 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529607 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556901 Anthony et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556911 Mehta et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556975 Ciupik et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562653 Alamin et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568457 Hunziker Oct 2013 B2
8617220 Skaggs Oct 2013 B2
8579979 Edie et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585595 Heilman Nov 2013 B2
8585740 Ross et al. Nov 2013 B1
8591549 Lange Nov 2013 B2
8591553 Eisermann et al. Nov 2013 B2
8613758 Linares Dec 2013 B2
8623036 Harrison et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632544 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632548 Soubeiran Jan 2014 B2
8632563 Nagase et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636771 Butler et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636802 Serhan et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641719 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8641723 Connor Feb 2014 B2
8657856 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8663285 Dall et al. Mar 2014 B2
8663287 Butler et al. Mar 2014 B2
8668719 Alamin et al. Mar 2014 B2
8709090 Makower et al. Apr 2014 B2
8758347 Weiner et al. Jun 2014 B2
8758355 Fisher et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771272 LeCronier et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777947 Zahrly et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777995 McClintock et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790343 McClellan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790409 Van den Heuvel et al. Jul 2014 B2
8828058 Elsebaie et al. Sep 2014 B2
8828087 Stone et al. Sep 2014 B2
8840651 Reiley Sep 2014 B2
8870881 Rezach et al. Oct 2014 B2
8870959 Arnin Oct 2014 B2
8894663 Giger et al. Nov 2014 B2
8915915 Harrison et al. Dec 2014 B2
8915917 Doherty et al. Dec 2014 B2
8920422 Homeier et al. Dec 2014 B2
8945188 Rezach et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961521 Keefer et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961567 Hunziker Feb 2015 B2
8968402 Myers et al. Mar 2015 B2
8968406 Arnin Mar 2015 B2
8992527 Guichet Mar 2015 B2
9022917 Kasic et al. May 2015 B2
9044218 Young Jun 2015 B2
9060810 Kercher et al. Jun 2015 B2
9078703 Arnin Jul 2015 B2
20020050112 Koch et al. May 2002 A1
20020072758 Reo et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020164905 Bryant Nov 2002 A1
20030040671 Somogyi et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030144669 Robinson Jul 2003 A1
20030220643 Ferree Nov 2003 A1
20030220644 Thelen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040011137 Hnat et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011365 Govari et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019353 Freid et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023623 Stauch et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040055610 Forsell Mar 2004 A1
20040133219 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040138725 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040193266 Meyer Sep 2004 A1
20050034705 McClendon Feb 2005 A1
20050049617 Chatlynne et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055025 Zacouto Mar 2005 A1
20050065529 Liu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075562 Szakelyhidi, Jr. et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050090823 Bartimus Apr 2005 A1
20050113831 Franck May 2005 A1
20050143766 Bachmann Jun 2005 A1
20050159754 Odrich Jul 2005 A1
20050234448 McCarthy Oct 2005 A1
20050234462 Hershberger Oct 2005 A1
20050246034 Soubeiran Nov 2005 A1
20050251109 Soubeiran Nov 2005 A1
20050261779 Meyer Nov 2005 A1
20050272976 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004459 Hazebrouck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009767 Kiester Jan 2006 A1
20060036259 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036323 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036324 Sachs et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047282 Gordon Mar 2006 A1
20060052782 Morgan et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058792 Hynes Mar 2006 A1
20060069447 DiSilvestro et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074448 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079897 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060136062 DiNello et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142767 Green et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155279 Ogilvie Jul 2006 A1
20060195087 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195088 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200134 Freid et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060204156 Takehara et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235299 Martinelli Oct 2006 A1
20060235424 Vitale et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241746 Shaoulian et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241767 Doty Oct 2006 A1
20060249914 Dulin Nov 2006 A1
20060271107 Harrison et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282073 Simanovsky Dec 2006 A1
20060293683 Stauch Dec 2006 A1
20070010814 Stauch Jan 2007 A1
20070010887 Williams et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021644 Woolson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031131 Griffitts Feb 2007 A1
20070043376 Leatherbury et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050030 Kim Mar 2007 A1
20070118215 Moaddeb May 2007 A1
20070161984 Cresina et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173837 Chan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179493 Kim Aug 2007 A1
20070185374 Kick et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191846 Bruneau et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070213751 Scirica Sep 2007 A1
20070233098 Mastrorio et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239159 Altarac et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239161 Giger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255088 Jacobson et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070264605 Belfor et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270803 Giger et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276368 Trieu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276369 Allard et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276373 Malandain Nov 2007 A1
20070276378 Harrison et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276493 Malandain et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282196 Birk et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288024 Gollogly Dec 2007 A1
20070288183 Bulkes et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009792 Henniges et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015577 Loeb Jan 2008 A1
20080021454 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021455 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021456 Gupta et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027436 Cournoyer et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033431 Jung et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033436 Song et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080048855 Berger Feb 2008 A1
20080051784 Gollogly Feb 2008 A1
20080082118 Edidin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086128 Lewis Apr 2008 A1
20080097487 Pool et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097496 Chang et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108995 Conway et al. May 2008 A1
20080161933 Grotz et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167685 Allard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172063 Taylor Jul 2008 A1
20080177319 Schwab Jul 2008 A1
20080177326 Thompson Jul 2008 A1
20080190237 Radinger et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228186 Gall et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080255615 Vittur et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080272928 Shuster Nov 2008 A1
20080275557 Makower et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090030462 Buttermann Jan 2009 A1
20090076597 Dahlgren et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082815 Zylber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088803 Justis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093820 Trieu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093890 Gelbart Apr 2009 A1
20090112263 Pool et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118699 Utley May 2009 A1
20090163780 Tieu Jun 2009 A1
20090171356 Klett Jul 2009 A1
20090192514 Feinberg et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198144 Phillips et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216113 Meier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090275984 Kim et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100004654 Schmitz et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100057127 McGuire et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094306 Chang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100185 Trieu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106192 Barry Apr 2010 A1
20100114322 Clifford et al. May 2010 A1
20100130941 Conlon et al. May 2010 A1
20100137872 Kam et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145449 Makower et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145462 Ainsworth et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168751 Anderson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100228258 Durham Sep 2010 A1
20100249782 Durham Sep 2010 A1
20100249847 Jung et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256626 Muller et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262239 Boyden et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318129 Seme et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331883 Schmitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004076 Janna et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110057756 Marinescu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066188 Seme et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110098748 Jangra Apr 2011 A1
20110152725 Demir et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110196435 Forsell Aug 2011 A1
20110202138 Shenoy et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110238126 Soubeiran Sep 2011 A1
20110257655 Copf, Jr. Oct 2011 A1
20110284014 Cadeddu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120019341 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120019342 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120053633 Stauch Mar 2012 A1
20120088953 King Apr 2012 A1
20120109207 Trieu May 2012 A1
20120116535 Ratron et al. May 2012 A1
20120158061 Koch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172883 Sayago Jul 2012 A1
20120179215 Soubeiran Jul 2012 A1
20120203282 Sachs et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221106 Makower et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271353 Barry Oct 2012 A1
20120296234 Wilhelm et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120329882 Messersmith et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130013066 Landry et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130072932 Stauch Mar 2013 A1
20130123847 Anderson et al. May 2013 A1
20130131674 Pool et al. May 2013 A1
20130138017 Jundt et al. May 2013 A1
20130138154 Reiley May 2013 A1
20130150863 Baumgartner Jun 2013 A1
20130150889 Fening et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130178903 Abdou Jul 2013 A1
20130211521 Shenoy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130245692 Hayes et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253344 Griswold et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253587 Carls et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130261672 Horvath Oct 2013 A1
20130296863 Globerman et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296864 Burley et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296940 Northcutt et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325006 Michelinie et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325071 Niemiec et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140005788 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025172 Lucas et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140052134 Orisek Feb 2014 A1
20140058392 Mueckter et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058450 Arlet Feb 2014 A1
20140066987 Hestad et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088715 Ciupik Mar 2014 A1
20140128920 Kantelhardt May 2014 A1
20140163664 Goldsmith Jun 2014 A1
20140236234 Kroll et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236311 Vicatos et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140257412 Patty et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277446 Clifford et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296918 Fening et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303538 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303539 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140358150 Kaufman et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150105782 D'Lima et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150105824 Moskowitz et al. Apr 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (36)
Number Date Country
1697630 Nov 2005 CN
101040807 Sep 2007 CN
1541262 Jun 1969 DE
8515687 Dec 1985 DE
8515687 Dec 1985 DE
19626230 Jan 1998 DE
19745654 Apr 1999 DE
102005045070 Apr 2007 DE
0663184 Jul 1995 EP
1905388 Apr 2008 EP
2901991 Dec 2007 FR
2900563 Aug 2008 FR
2892617 Sep 2008 FR
2916622 Sep 2009 FR
2961386 Jul 2012 FR
H0956736 Mar 1997 JP
2002500063 Jan 2002 JP
2001005463 Jan 2001 WO
WO1998044858 Jan 2002 WO
WO1999051160 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001024697 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001045485 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001045487 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001067973 Jan 2002 WO
WO2001078614 Jan 2002 WO
2006090380 Aug 2006 WO
2007025191 Mar 2007 WO
2007118179 Oct 2007 WO
2007144489 Dec 2007 WO
2008003952 Jan 2008 WO
WO2007015239 Jan 2008 WO
2008040880 Apr 2008 WO
WO2007013059 Apr 2009 WO
WO2011116158 Jan 2012 WO
WO2013119528 Aug 2013 WO
WO2014040013 Mar 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (104)
Entry
Abe et al., “Experimental external fixation combined with percutaneous discectomy in the management of scoliosis.”, Spine, 1999, pp. 646-653, 24, No. 7.
Ahlbom et al., “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.”, Health Physics, 1998, pp. 494-522, 74, No. 4.
Amer et al., “Evaluation of treatment of late-onset tibia vara using gradual angulation translation high tibial osteotomy”, ACTA Orthopaedica Belgica, 2010, pp. 360-366, 76, No. 3.
Angrisani et al., “Lap-Band® Rapid Port™M System: Preliminary results in 21 patients”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 936, 15, No. 7.
Baumgart et al., “A fully implantable, programmable distraction nail (Fitbone)—new perspectives for corrective and reconstructive limb surgery.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 189-198.
Baumgart et al., “The bioexpandable prosthesis: A new perspective after resection of malignant bone tumors in children.”, J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2005, pp. 452-455, 27, No. 8.
Bodó et al., “Development of a tension-adjustable implant for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.”, Eklem Hastaliklari ve Cerrahisi—Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, 2008, pp. 27-32, 19, No. 1.
Boudjemline et al., “Off-label use of an adjustable gastric banding system for pulmonary artery banding.”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, pp. 1130-1135, 131, No. 5.
Brown et al., “Single port surgery and the Dundee Endocone.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions: Emerging Technology Poster Abstracts, 2007, ETP007, pp. 323-324.
Buchowski et al., “Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, pp. 2035-2041, 88-A, No. 9.
Burghardt et al., “Mechanical failure of the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor in limb lengthening.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, pp. 639-643, 93-B, No. 5.
Burke, “Design of a minimally invasive non fusion device for the surgical management of scoliosis in the skeletally immature”, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2006, pp. 378-384, 123.
Carter et al., “A cumulative damage model for bone fracture.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1985, pp. 84-90, 3, No. 1.
Chapman et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: A systematic literature review.”, Surgery, 2004, pp. 326-351, 135, No. 3.
Cole et al., “Operative technique intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: Tibial surgical technique.”, Orthofix, 2005.
Cole et al., “The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia.”, Injury, 2001, pp. S-D-129-S-D-139, 32.
Dailey et al., “A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures.”, Clinical Biomechanics, 2012, pp. 182-188, 27, No. 2.
Daniels et al., “A new method for continuous intraoperative measurement of Harrington rod loading patterns.”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1984, pp. 233-246, 12, No. 3.
De Giorgi et al., “Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of severe scoliosis.”, European Spine Journal, 1999, pp. 8-15, No. 1.
Dorsey et al., “The stability of three commercially available implants used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2006, pp. 95-98, 19, No. 2.
Edeland et al., “Instrumentation for distraction by limited surgery in scoliosis treatment.”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1981, pp. 143-146, 3, No. 2.
Elsebaie, “Single growing rods (Review of 21 cases). Changing the foundations: Does it affect the results?”, Journal of Child Orthop, 2007, 1:258.
Ember et al., “Distraction forces required during growth rod lengthening.”, J of Bone Joint Surg BR, 2006, p. 229, 88-B, No. Suppl. II.
European Patent Office, “Observations by a third party under Article 115 EPC in EP08805612 by Soubeiran.”, 2010.
Fabry et al., “A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding.”, Obesity Surgery, 2002, pp. 285-288, 12, No. 2.
Fried et al., “In vivo measurements of different gastric band pressures towards the gastric wall at the stoma region.”, Obesity Surgery, 2004, p. 914, 14, No. 7.
Gao et al., CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007, pp. 957-965, 80.
Gebhart et al., “Early clinical experience with a custom made growing endoprosthesis in children with malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity actioned by an external permanent magnet; The Phenix M. system”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage. Sep. 3, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Gillespie et al. “Harrington instrumentation without fusion.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1981, p. 461, 63-B, No. 3.
Goodship et al., “Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998, pp. S105-S115, No. 355S.
Grass et al., “Intermittent distracting rod for correction of high neurologic risk congenital scoliosis.”, Spine, 1997, pp. 1922-1927, 22, No. 16.
Gray, “Gray's anatomy of the human body.”, http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/128, published Jul. 1, 2007.
Grimer et al. “Non-invasive extendable endoprostheses for children—Expensive but worth it!”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, 2007.
Grünert, “The development of a totally implantable electronic sphincter.” (translated from the German “Die Entwicklung eines total implantierbaren elektronischen Sphincters”), Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1969, pp. 1170-1174, 325.
Guichet et al. “Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, pp. 838-848, 85-A, No. 5.
Gupta et al., “Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, pp. 649-654, 88-B, No. 5.
Hankemeier et al., “Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD).”, Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, pp. 79-101, 17, No. 1.
Harrington, “Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962, pp. 591-610, 44-A, No. 4.
Hennig et al., “The safety and efficacy of a new adjustable plate used for proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthrosis.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2007, pp. 6-14, 20, No. 1.
Hofmeister et al., “Callus distraction with the Albizzia nail.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 211-215.
Horbach et al., “First experiences with the routine use of the Rapid Port™system with the Lap-Band®.”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Hyodo et al., “Bone transport using intramedullary fixation and a single flexible traction cable.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996, pp. 256-268, 325.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, “Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields.” Health Physics, 2009, pp. 504-514, 96, No. 4.
INVIS®/Lamello Catalog, 2006, Article No. 68906A001 GB.
Kasliwal et al., “Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis.”, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2013, pp. 275-291, 24, No. 2.
Kenawey et al., “Leg lengthening using intramedullay skeletal kinetic distractor: Results of 57 consecutive applications.”, Injury, 2011, pp. 150-155, 42, No. 2.
Kent et al., “Assessment and correction of femoral malrotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, pp. 580-584, 76, No. 5.
Klemme et al., “Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997, pp. 734-742, 17, No. 6.
Korenkov et al., “Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.”, Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, pp. 1068-1071, 17, No. 7.
Krieg et al., “Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008, pp. 189-197, 466, No. 1.
Kucukkaya et al., “The new intramedullary cable bone transport technique.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009, pp. 531-536, 23, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “In vivo band manometry: A new method in band adjustment”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 935, 15, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “Intra-band manometry for band adjustments: The basics”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, pp. 417-418, 16, No. 4.
Li et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail: A case report with histologic examination of the regenerated segment.”, Injury, 1999, pp. 525-534, 30, No. 8.
Lonner, “Emerging minimally invasive technologies for the management of scoliosis.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 431-440, 38, No. 3.
Matthews et al., “Magnetically adjustable intraocular lens.”, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2003, pp. 2211-2216, 29, No. 11.
Micromotion, “Micro Drive Engineering. General catalogue.”, 2009, pp. 14-24.
Mineiro et al., “Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: Early results.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2002, pp. 290-295, 22, No. 3.
Moe et al., “Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 35-45, 185.
Montague et al., “Magnetic gear dynamics for servo control.”, Melecon 2010-2010 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valletta, 2010, pp. 1192-1197.
Montague et al., “Servo control of magnetic gears.”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, pp. 269-278, 17, No. 2.
Nachemson et al., “Intravital wireless telemetry of axial forces in Harrington distraction rods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, pp. 445-465, 53, No. 3.
Nachlas et al., “The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951, pp. 24-34, 33-A, No. 1.
Newton et al., “Fusionless scoliosis correction by anterolateral tethering . . . can it work ?. ”, 39th Annual Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, 2004.
Oh et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia.”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2008, pp. 801-808, 128, No. 8.
Ozcivici et al., “Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone.”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2010, pp. 50-59, 6, No. 1.
Piorkowski et al., Preventing Port Site Inversion in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007, 3(2), pp. 159-162, Elsevier; New York, U.S.A.
Prontes, “Longest bone in body.”, eHow.com, 2012.
Rathjen et al., “Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis.”, Spine, 2007, pp. 2184-2188, 32, No. 20.
Ren et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Surgical technique”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2003, pp. 257-263, 13, No. 4.
Reyes-Sanchez et al., “External fixation for dynamic correction of severe scoliosis”, The Spine Journal, 2005, pp. 418-426, 5, No. 4.
Rinsky et al., “Segmental instrumentation without fusion in children with progressive scoliosis.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 1985, pp. 687-690, 5, No. 6.
Rode et al., “A simple way to adjust bands under radiologic control”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Schmerling et al., “Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis.”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1976, pp. 879-892, 10, No. 6.
Scott et al., “Transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions, Poster Abstracts, Apr. 18-22, 2007, P511, p. 306.
Sharke, “The machinery of life”, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2004, Printed from Internet site Oct. 24, 2007 http://www.memagazine.org/contents/current/features/moflife/moflife.html.
Shiha et al., “Ilizarov gradual correction of genu varum deformity in adults.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2009, pp. 784-791, 75, No. 6.
Simpson et al., “Femoral lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor.”, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, pp. 955-961, 91-B, No. 7.
Smith, “The use of growth-sparing instrumentation in pediatric spinal deformity.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 547-552, 38, No. 4.
Soubeiran et al. “The Phenix M System, a fully implanted non-invasive lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet. Applications in limb salvage.” International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Soubeiran et al., “The Phenix M System. A fully implanted lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet; Applications to pediatric orthopaedics”, 6th European Research Conference in Pediatric Orthopaedics, Oct. 6, 2006, Toulouse, France (7 pages).
Stokes et al., “Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: Novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods. Prospective validation study and assessment of clinical algorithm”, 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Jul. 11, 2013. Vancouver, Canada. Scoliosis Research Society.
Sun et al., “Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: Interfragmentary micromovement.”, Bone, 2007, pp. 188-196, 41, No. 2.
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR II. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib II: Technique Guide.”, 2008, 40 pgs.
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib, Patient Guide.”, 2005, 26 pgs.
Takaso et al., “New remote-controlled growing-rod spinal instrumentation possibly applicable for scoliosis in young children.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 1998, pp. 336-340, 3, No. 6.
Teli et al., “Measurement of forces generated during distraction of growing rods.”, Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 2007, pp. 257-258, 1, No. 4.
Tello, “Harrington instrumentation without arthrodesis and consecutive distraction program for young children with severe spinal deformities: Experience and technical details.”, The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1994, pp. 333-351, 25, No. 2.
Thaller et al., “Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX®)—Preliminary results.”, Injury, 2014 (E-published Oct. 28, 2013), pp. S60-S65, 45.
Thompson et al., “Early onset scoliosis: Future directions”, 2007, J Bone Joint Surg Am, pp. 163-166, 89-A, Suppl 1.
Thompson et al., “Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 2007, pp. 354-361, 27, No. 3.
Thonse et al., “Limb lengthening with a fully implantable, telescopic, intramedullary nail.”, Operative Techniques in Orthopedics, 2005, pp. 355-362, 15, No. 4.
Trias et al., “Dynamic loads experienced in correction of idiopathic scoliosis using two types of Harrington rods.”, Spine, 1979, pp. 228-235, 4, No. 3.
Verkerke et al., “An extendable modular endoprosthetic system for bone tumor management in the leg”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1990, pp. 91-96, 12, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Design of a lengthening element for a modular femur endoprosthetic system”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1989, pp. 97-102, 203, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Development and test of an extendable endoprosthesis for bone reconstruction in the leg.”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1994, pp. 155-162, 17, No. 3.
Weiner et al., “Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding”, Surgical Technology International, 2005, pp. 63-69, 15.
Wenger, “Spine jack operation in the correction of scoliotic deformity: A direct intrathoracic attack to straighten the laterally bent spine: Preliminary report”, Arch Surg, 1961, pp. 123-132 (901-910), 83, No. 6.
White, III et al., “The clinical biomechanics of scoliosis.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1976, pp. 100-112, 118.
Yonnet, “A new type of permanent magnet coupling.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1981, pp. 2991-2993, 17, No. 6.
Yonnet, “Passive magnetic bearings with permanent magnets.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1978, pp. 803-805, 14, No. 5.
Zheng et al., “Force and torque characteristics for magnetically driven blood pump.”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2002, pp. 292-302, 241, No. 2.
International Search Report for PCT/US2009/060266, ISA, dated Dec. 10, 2009.
Written Opinion for PCT/US2009/060266, ISA, dated Dec. 10, 2009.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200315665 A1 Oct 2020 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61240071 Sep 2009 US
61113086 Nov 2008 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12615855 Nov 2009 US
Child 13747028 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15986496 May 2018 US
Child 16907457 US
Parent 14885227 Oct 2015 US
Child 15986496 US
Parent 13747028 Jan 2013 US
Child 14885227 US