External package capable of being radio-tagged

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7847695
  • Patent Number
    7,847,695
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 19, 2005
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 7, 2010
    13 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to an external package, particularly one with a conductive coating and in whose surroundings an RFID tag is used. The conductive area of the electrically conductive layer is interrupted by a structure.
Description

The invention relates to an external package, particularly one enclosing a product with a radio tag, such as an RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) tag, and/or in whose proximity there is such a tag.


Groceries, cigarettes, tobacco in general, chewing gum, chocolates and much more are typically packaged in foils which keep the content fresh. The foils are often made of paper or another support (such as a polymer film) onto which a thin electrically conductive layer, normally a metal layer, typically aluminum, has been put. In this case, the thin metal layer has quite a few effects; among other things it has a shiny appearance, forms a barrier layer for oxygen and moisture, reflects the radiation of heat and has a correspondingly insulating character.


A drawback of this external package with an electrically conductive layer when using RFID tags, particularly EPC (Electronic Product Code) tags and EAS (Electronic Article Surveillance) tags, as is currently being planned on a grand scale, is that the electrically conductive layer of the external package produces an electrically conductive area which shields electromagnetic waves undesirably, in similar fashion to in what is known as a Faraday cage, or reflects them and hence makes it difficult or even impossible to use radio tags and/or miscellaneous electric components on the product and/or on the external package.


It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an external package having a support and an electrically conductive layer which does not prevent the use of tags in the surroundings of the external package.


This object is achieved by the subject matter of the independent and dependent claims, the description and the figures.


The invention relates to an external package for a product having an electric component, comprising at least one support and an electrically conductive layer, where the electrically conductive layer has a structure and/or a coating which reduces the shielding produced by its conductive area in the surroundings of the external package such that the use of an electric component which delivers or receives information externally through the external package and/or whose power supply is fed through the external package is not adversely affected or is adversely affected only to an extent such that the component is still operable.


In this context, the term “in the surroundings” covers the following:


Firstly a tag which is arranged directly on the product and/or within the external package.


Secondly a tag which is in proximity to the external package.


The shielding by the external package means that disturbances in the case of conventional tags within and/or directly on the external packages and also in the case of tags which are outside the external package, but in proximity thereto, normally arise as a result of the electromagnetic waves being reflected by the metal, for example. In this context, the term “in the surroundings” or “close” means “in the region of the typical reading range of the tags”, for example typically up to approximately 70 cm at 13.56 MHz, and in the case of UHF (Ultra High Frequency ˜850-950 MHz) this may be up to approximately 2 m, and in the GHz range even more still (several meters).


The term “that the component is still operable” means the shielding which is still tolerable and may not indicate a specific value, since this is dependent on many factors such as transmission power, transmission frequency and/or the type of component, such as the type of radio tag. Shielding which is no longer tolerable is a reduction in the reading distance by half (e.g. from 70 cm to 35 cm), for example, and/or exists when any information is shielded down to below the noise limit and/or the power supply for a radio frequency tag is reduced to below the minimum operating voltage.


A shielding-reducing coating for the conductive layer of the external package may be used as an alternative to the structure and/or in addition to it and preferably has a high electrical impedance (e.g. >10^5 Ohm m) or is insulating.


By way of example, the visually metallic effect can be achieved merely by very thin metal layers (of a few 10 nm, which have very poor electrical conductivity on account of the small layer thickness and/or because they have a very high level of interrupt-on owing to their production process, e.g. vapor deposition, sputtering), which can then be brought into line with the further requirements of the external package using various lacquer layers.


It is equally possible to put an image on the external package, possibly even over the structure.


The structure in the conductive layer changes the shielding and/or reflection effects such that induced, shielding and/or reflecting currents in the conductive layer (e.g. as a result of eddy currents) are reduced or even prevented. As a result, the electromagnetic radiation then penetrates the external package and/or it is possible for coupling, particularly inductive, capacitive, near-field or far-field coupling, to take place. It is then possible to transmit electric power and/or information in the surroundings of the external package, even in the region of the transmission powers of RFID tags.


The transmission powers are usually stipulated by laws. An overview of the transmission powers which can be used for RFID applications is given in (Klaus Finkenzeller, “RFID-Handbuch” [RFID manual], 2nd edition, Hauser Verlag Munich, 2000, ISBN 3-446-21278-7), for example. Accordingly, the limit value for the carrier power for 13.56 MHz applications in Germany is 68.5 dBμA at a distance of 3 m and 13.5 dBμA at a distance of 30 m from the transmitter, with the magnetic H field for the radio installation being measured. The power limits vary for different frequencies and for different countries.


The structure interrupts the electrically conductive area of the electrically conductive layer once or a plurality of times, with the interruption preferably dividing at least the area above a coil of the electric component, for example, into two halves, for example. The structure disturbs the shielding most effectively when it is arranged opposite and in the center of a coil of the electric component.


By way of example, the structure is a simple recess which completely or partly passes through the conductive area of the electrically conductive layer. The shape of the recesses is irrelevant, only the size and shape of the remaining conductive regions is important, which need to be designed such that eddy currents are prevented.


The structure divides the conductive area of the electrically conductive layer into at least two smaller conductive areas. The structure can also divide the conductive area of the electrically conductive layer into many small conductive areas, however. By way of example, the structure comprises at least two parallel and/or at least two nonparallel recesses. In this case, what is important is not the shape of the recesses but rather the size and shape of the remaining conductive area (with the same area, for example, an open circle has hardly any effect but a closed circle has a very pronounced shielding effect), and at a given frequency a smaller area produces little shielding but a larger scale produces greater shielding.


The external package can be produced by putting an electrically conductive layer onto a support, for example paper or foil, and then patterning it in a subsequent work step. The structure is preferably made using simple means and/or minimal actions.


By way of example, what is known as dry phase patterning is particularly advantageous (for example see the publication by Pira International Copyr. 2002, “RFID in Packaging”, Dr. Peter Harrp, “Pira on printing”, ISBN 1858029457; PAELLA Project ACREO, dry phase patterning method; Antenna for EAS RFID p. 49 fig. 6.2), since this uses no wet-chemical methods. Advantageously, the conductive layer of the external package is patterned in large volumes and/or inexpensively by a dry patterning method, for example using a patterned scratching method (which is also suitable for roll-to-roll).


It is naturally also possible to use any other patterning direct or indirect, additive or subtractive methods, however, depending on the type of external package (e.g. patterned vapor deposition, printing with a protective Lacquer and a subsequent wet or dry etching method).


For metals, the structure can be made by wet chemical means using etching processes, by dry process steps such as dry etching, cutting and/or punching processes and/or by dry patterning using impression the impressed points being removed with a knife and/or being able to be filled with another material.


Conversely, it is also possible to put an already patterned electrically conductive layer onto the support, however, as is possible by means of printing (e.g. conductive pastes, conductive silver, organically based materials) or bonding/lamination (e.g. aluminum, copper, silver), for example. The electrically conductive layer can also be put on in patterned form by vapor deposition and/or sputtering. Other methods are lamination, electroplating, spraying, dunking, blade coating and/or printing.


In this case, the electrically conductive layer is patterned/interrupted such that, although the electric power is interrupted, the external package and particularly the foil used as support are patterned as an entire still mechanical layer or a portion thereof, and the support is essentially retained. It is not even necessary to cut through the electrically conductive area completely, and only the conductive connection within the area is interrupted during patterning.


The depth of the recess in the structure matches the thickness of the external package's electrically conductive layer. It can make up the entire thickness of the layer or just a portion of the thickness so long as it is ensured that the structure interrupts the conductive contact within the conductive area and/or the resistance within the conductive area is so high that the shielding produced by the conductive area does not adversely affect the use of radio tags.


The width of the structure is arbitrary so long as it interrupts the conductive area. By way of example, the width of the structure is typically a few 10-500 μm. The minimum width is dependent only on the process used (in order to guarantee secure electrical interruption).


The structure does not just remove and/or expel material from the electrically conductive layer, for example, but rather it is also possible to work and/or impress another, for example insulating, material into the electrically conductive layer, so that shielding within the external package is prevented to a sufficient extent. The use of additionally introduced material may turn out to be advantageous particularly for applications in which the freshness preservation effect of the external package, particularly also on the barrier properties of the external package toward air (oxygen and/or moisture), is in the foreground.


The external package can, but does not have to, be visually shaped by the structure, it may also comprise any other layers, both for visual and for functional purposes, with graphical forms of the external package being able to be produced by the structure or supported by the structure or else being put on the external package without disturbance by the structure.


The size of the remaining continuously conductive areas is dependent on the frequency used and on the size of the antennas used. In this context, when inductive coupling is used the size of the antennas used is crucial and when electromagnetic waves are used the frequency is crucial. One practicality found is that for general prevention of shielding the following is true: the smaller the individual areas the better. A preferred maximum size for the still remaining conducting area of the electrically conductive layer for inductive coupling is taken to be approximately half the area of the transmission antenna, and for larger areas the degree of shielding increases “rapidly”, as can be seen from FIG. 7 using a real measurement.


The areas patterned in this manner may take any form (image, logo and/or writing) so long as it is ensured that overall no shielding character arises. The structure can attain a wide variety of visual effects, in particular it is also able to be used for marketing purposes, or for brand protection, or theft prevention or other security features. As an alternative or in addition, the structure may also have other technical functional electrical effects, for example antennas for RFID tags can be produced by the structure.


In this context, in accordance with one advantageous refinement, the structure and/or a portion thereof forms an electric component, for example when it is in the form of an antenna (e.g. coil form or interrupted bar form) for RFID tags and/or other radio tags. In this context, the tag is also situated directly on the portion of the external package with the structure, for example.


It is naturally also possible to produce other electric components using the structure, such as capacitors. For this, however, conductive layers are required on both sides of the external package's support. Similarly, it is also possible to produce resistive tracks by means of a suitable form for the conductor tracks.


By way of example, one portion (normally the largest portion) of the overall external package is patterned and altered using methods as discussed, so that it no longer shields and/or reflects electromagnetic radiation, and at least one other portion of the external package is patterned and altered such that this structure can be used as an antenna for an RFID tag or radio tag or for other purposes, For example.


The typically used external packages for groceries, cigarettes, tobacco in general, chewing gum, chocolates, butter, margarine, cheese, etc. comprise paper or another support, for example including a polymer film (PET, PES, PEN, polyimide, etc.), as the support material with an electrically conductive layer laminated thereon. The possible materials for producing the electrically conductive layer include all metals (e.g. aluminum, copper, silver, gold, chromium, titanium, tin, zinc, iron, etc. and any alloys), conductive pastes (e.g. conductive silver, CarbonBlack (which are pastes with graphite/carbon black)), conductive organically based materials (e.g. polyaniline, Pedot/Pss, or the like) or organometallic systems (e.g. inks with dissolved metal compounds) or combinations thereof.


The thickness of the support varies and is typically 20-100 g/m^2 in the case of paper, with 30-50 g/m2 being usual, for example. In the case of polymer films, it is possible to use any thicknesses, depending on the type of external package, with 10-50 μm (e.g. PET, PPS or similar materials) being typical, for example. The thickness of the conductive laminated layer is 3 to 50 μm, preferably 5-15 μm (e.g. for aluminum-laminated paper for cigarette packages, for example). This may naturally also vary for the other materials or methods mentioned. It is naturally also possible to put on further layers apart from those mentioned, e.g. a protective lacquer to prevent scratching or as a seal, and also, naturally, colored layers for visual misprinting or else further layers for other purposes.


In this case, particularly the radio tags are in the foreground as the electric component. Examples of these are RFID tags, particularly EPC (Electronic Product Code) tags and/or EAS (Electronic Article Surveillance) tags. These tags are based on nationally or internationally released frequency bands for signal transmission, these typically being: 125-135 kHz, 13.56 MHz, 860-950 MHz or 2.45 GHz. In some cases, other frequency bands may also be used, such as approximately 6-8 MHz for theft prevention tags.


It is naturally also possible to produce other fields of use, e.g. use of remote controls (typically in the region of approximately 20-60 MHz), mobile radio (850-2000 MHz) and radio (LW, SW, VHF or comparable) or satellite radio. It is also possible to design external packaging such that it does not need to be removed in microwave ovens (e.g. for heating meals).


The patterning may also be made such that certain frequency ranges and/or directions of polarization are passed and others are shielded or reflected, e.g. using the size and shape of the conductive areas.


The electric component may also comprise at least one functional layer made of organically based material and/or may generally be associated with polymer electronics or with organic electronics.


The patterned external package can then be fed back into the conventional packaging process.





The invention is explained in more detail below using exemplary embodiments:



FIG. 1 schematically shows a conductive area in which a structure interrupts the electrically conductive connection within the area.



FIG. 2 shows the same patterned conductive area, with the dimensions of the structure being able to be seen.



FIGS. 3 and 4 show patterned electrically conductive components in relation to the position of the structure.



FIG. 5 shows an example of a structure, and



FIG. 6 finally shows an external package with the position shown for the inner coil and on the outside a corresponding coil which corresponds to the coil shown on the inside.



FIG. 7 shows a real measurement for the shielding effect of a conductive layer which is pushed between a transmitter and a receiver antenna.






FIG. 1 shows an external package 1 with a structure 2 on it, it being clearly visible that the structure 2 does not go right through, but extends over more than half of the external package. A structure 2 which goes right through is naturally also covered by the invention.



FIG. 2 shows the external package 1 in a perspective view on which it is possible to see the support 13 and the electrically conductive layer 14 with the structure 2.


The position of the structure 2 and its dimensions can be seen in FIG. 2. The width 4 of the structure 2 can be chosen freely so long as the electrical conductivity is interrupted by the width 4 of this structure 2. The same applies to the depth 3 of the structure 2 (the depth may also cover the entire conductive layer, for security reasons even right into the support material). Only the length 5 of the structure 2 is related to the coil of the electric component and/or of the radio tag (not shown in FIG. 2) such that it measures at least half of the coil.



FIG. 3 shows the external package 1 with a structure 2 which does not cover the entire length of the electrically conductive area, but the entire length of the antenna 12 (the antenna shown here, merely by way of example and schematically, is a coil for inductive coupling). The form of the antenna may be quite different, depending on the field of use; e.g. in the form of a dipole.



FIG. 4 shows a similar design to that in FIG. 3 with the difference that in this case the structure 2 extends only as far as at least half of the extent of the coil 12. In both cases, shielding by the electrically conductive layer of the external package is prevented to such an extent that the use of radio tags is appropriate, that is to say the component is still operable.



FIG. 5 shows an example of a structure which can be put onto the electrically conductive layer of the external package 1 over a large area. It is possible to see a diamond-shaped structure with a large number of parallel and a large number of nonparallel recesses 7 in which the electrically conductive area 6 of the electrically conductive layer of the external package 1 is divided into a large number of small areas. Shielding, which would sensitively disturb the use of radio tags, is effectively prevented by this means because small conductive areas bring about no disturbances in the radio link between the radio tag and the reader. Particularly if the position of the coil within the external package is not clear, it makes sense to put on a large-area structure, as shown here, because the most effective prevention of shielding is achieved by a recess in the electrically conductive area opposite the coil of the electric component, said coil always being automatically covered too with application over a large area.



FIG. 6 shows the shielding area (i.e. the external package) in the form of a packet 10. An external transmission antenna 8 is opposite the receiver antenna 11 which is in the packet. On the basis of the prior art, the electromagnetic radiation between the transmission antenna 8 and the receiver antenna 11 is shielded by the packet between them, which has a conductive area in or on it, so that no radio link is set up. However, the structure 9 based on the invention interrupts the conductive area, and it is therefore possible to set up radio contact between the transmitter 8 and the receiver 11. The same naturally also applies if the receiver antenna 11 is not “inside” the packet but rather on and outside the external package but in its surroundings.


The structure 9 shown is just one example and, on the basis of the invention, the structure may naturally take all possible forms, e.g. including the form shown in FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 shows a measurement of the shielding effect of a conductive layer. Between the transmission antenna 8 and the reception antenna 11, a conductive layer, namely the external package layer 1, is pushed from the left to the right in the direction of the arrow 18. The graph at the top now shows the induced voltage measured at 11 as a function of the overlap by the conductive layer 1. It can clearly be seen that up to an approximately ⅓ overlap the induced voltage remains constant, that is to say there is no shielding effect. With a larger overlap, a rapid drop in the induced voltage then occurs, that is to say that a severe shielding effect occurs. With a complete overlap, it is almost impossible to measure any induced voltage (essentially noise), which indicates a largely full shielding effect. A similar response is also obtained when the transmitter and receiver antennas are situated on one side of the conductive foil and the conductive foil is passed very close to one of the antennas.


The possibly of reducing the shielding by electrically conductive external packages, disclosed here for the first time, allows very simple means and minimum intervention to be used to reduce the unwanted shielding effect of conductive areas to magnetic and electromagnetic fields significantly. It is therefore possible to accommodate radio tags, for example, within or in the surroundings of metallized packages without adversely affecting their operability.


The already publicized intention of many companies to put RFID tags on a large number of products in future is also made possible here for products which are packed in metal foils, metallized and/or metal-laminated paper or foil and/or composite materials which contain metal layers.

Claims
  • 1. An external package for a product having an electric component, comprising: at least one support and an electrically conductive layer coupled to the support, the external package comprising one of a paper or a polymer film forming the support;the electrically conductive layer having an electrically conductive area, the layer comprising a structure and/or a coating arranged to reduce the electrical shielding otherwise exhibited by the conductive area in the surroundings of the external package such that electromagnetic radiation penetrates through the electrically conductive layer, the use of the electric component which delivers or receives information externally through the external package and/or whose power supply is fed through the external package thereby being not adversely affected or thereby is adversely affected only to an extent such that the component remains operable;the structure for dividing the conductive area of the electrically conductive layer into at least two electrically isolated areas and being arranged to interrupt the electrically conductive area of the electrically conductive layer at least once;the electrical component including a coil adjacent to the conductive layer, the coil having a center, the structure being arranged opposite the coil center, the interruption dividing the conductive area in at least the area adjacent to the coil into two halves.
  • 2. The external package as claimed in claim 1, wherein the structure comprises a recess in the conductive area of the electrically conductive layer.
  • 3. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the structure comprises at least two recesses.
  • 4. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the coating for reducing the shielding comprises a metal layer with a maximum thickness of 1 μm with further layers for completing the external package.
  • 5. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the structure and/or portions of the structure form electric components, comprising at least one of an antenna, a capacitor, a conductor track, and a diode or portions thereof.
  • 6. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the structure at least partly exhibits not only its technical effect of reducing electrical shielding, but also a visual effect, comprising reproducing at least one of an image, a security feature, a lettering, a miscellaneous visual feature and/or a logo.
  • 7. The external package as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the surface of the external package is arranged to exhibit an image.
  • 8. The external package as claimed in claim 1 arranged for use in at least one of a cigarette package, a grocery package, a medicine package, a radio, a remote control or a microwave oven.
  • 9. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the support has a thickness of less than or equal to about 50 μm.
  • 10. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the electrically conductive layer has a thickness of less than or equal to about 50 μm.
  • 11. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the structure has a width and a length, the width having a value of up to about 500 μm.
  • 12. The external package as claimed in claim 1 wherein the external package has a side of a given extent, the structure extending over more than half of the given extent of the side of the external package.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2004 040 831 Aug 2004 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/DE2005/001468 8/19/2005 WO 00 8/29/2007
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2006/021193 3/2/2006 WO A
US Referenced Citations (123)
Number Name Date Kind
3512052 MacIver et al. May 1970 A
3769096 Ashkin Oct 1973 A
3955098 Kawamoto May 1976 A
3999122 Winstel et al. Dec 1976 A
4246298 Guarnery Jan 1981 A
4302648 Sado et al. Nov 1981 A
4340057 Bloch Jul 1982 A
4442019 Marks Apr 1984 A
4554229 Small Nov 1985 A
4865197 Craig Sep 1989 A
4926052 Hatayama May 1990 A
4937119 Nickles et al. Jun 1990 A
5075816 Stormbom Dec 1991 A
5173835 Cornett et al. Dec 1992 A
5206525 Yamamoto et al. Apr 1993 A
5259926 Kuwabara et al. Nov 1993 A
5321240 Takahira Jun 1994 A
5347144 Garnier et al. Sep 1994 A
5364735 Akamatsu Nov 1994 A
5395504 Saurer et al. Mar 1995 A
5480839 Ezawa et al. Jan 1996 A
5486851 Gehner et al. Jan 1996 A
5502396 Desarzens Mar 1996 A
5528222 Moskowitz Jun 1996 A
5546889 Wakita et al. Aug 1996 A
5569879 Gloton Oct 1996 A
5574291 Dodabalapur et al. Nov 1996 A
5578513 Maegawa Nov 1996 A
5580794 Allen Dec 1996 A
5625199 Baumbach et al. Apr 1997 A
5629530 Brown et al. May 1997 A
5630986 Charlton May 1997 A
5652645 Jain Jul 1997 A
5691089 Smayling Nov 1997 A
5693956 Shi Dec 1997 A
5705826 Aratani et al. Jan 1998 A
5729428 Sakata et al. Mar 1998 A
5854139 Aratani et al. Dec 1998 A
5858500 MacPherson Jan 1999 A
5869972 Birch et al. Feb 1999 A
5883397 Isoda et al. Mar 1999 A
5892244 Tanaka et al. Apr 1999 A
5946551 Dimitrakopoulos Aug 1999 A
5967048 Fromson et al. Oct 1999 A
5970318 Choi et al. Oct 1999 A
5973598 Beigel Oct 1999 A
5994773 Hirakawa Nov 1999 A
5997817 Crismore et al. Dec 1999 A
5998805 Shi et al. Dec 1999 A
6036919 Thym et al. Mar 2000 A
6045977 Chandross et al. Apr 2000 A
6060338 Tanaka et al. May 2000 A
6072716 Jacobsen et al. Jun 2000 A
6083104 Choi Jul 2000 A
6087196 Sturm et al. Jul 2000 A
6107920 Eberhardt et al. Aug 2000 A
6133835 DeLeeuw et al. Oct 2000 A
6150668 Bao Nov 2000 A
6162550 Pinchen et al. Dec 2000 A
6180956 Chondroudis Jan 2001 B1
6197663 Chandross Mar 2001 B1
6207472 Calligari et al. Mar 2001 B1
6215130 Dodabalapur Apr 2001 B1
6221553 Wolk Apr 2001 B1
6249227 Brady et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251513 Rector Jun 2001 B1
6284562 Batlogg et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291126 Wolk et al. Sep 2001 B2
6300141 Segal et al. Oct 2001 B1
6321571 Themont et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322736 Bao Nov 2001 B1
6329226 Jones Dec 2001 B1
6330464 Colvin Dec 2001 B1
6335539 Dimitrakopoulos et al. Jan 2002 B1
6336017 Miyamoto et al. Jan 2002 B1
6340822 Brown et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344662 Dimitrakopoulos et al. Feb 2002 B1
6362509 Hart Mar 2002 B1
6384804 Dodabalapur et al. May 2002 B1
6403396 Gudesen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6429450 Mutsaers et al. Aug 2002 B1
6483473 King et al. Nov 2002 B1
6498114 Amundson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6517995 Jacobson et al. Feb 2003 B1
6518949 Drazic Feb 2003 B2
6521109 Bartic et al. Feb 2003 B1
6548875 Nishiyama Apr 2003 B2
6555840 Hudson Apr 2003 B1
6593690 McCormick Jul 2003 B1
6603139 Tessler Aug 2003 B1
6621098 Jackson Sep 2003 B1
6834251 Fletcher Dec 2004 B1
6852583 Bernds et al. Feb 2005 B2
6888509 Atherton May 2005 B2
6903958 Bernds et al. Jun 2005 B2
6960489 Bernds et al. Nov 2005 B2
20010026187 Oku Oct 2001 A1
20010046081 Hayashi et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020018911 Bernius et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020021218 Qiu et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020022284 Heeger Feb 2002 A1
20020025391 Angelopoulos Feb 2002 A1
20020053320 Duthaler May 2002 A1
20020056839 Joo et al. May 2002 A1
20020068392 Lee et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020130042 Moerman et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020160786 Rietzler et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020170897 Hall Nov 2002 A1
20020195644 Dodabalapur et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030059987 Sirringhaus et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030070500 Hung Apr 2003 A1
20030112576 Brewer et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030141807 Kawase Jul 2003 A1
20030178620 Bernds et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040002176 Xu Jan 2004 A1
20040005418 Schmid et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040013982 Jacobson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040026689 Bernds et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040074974 Senba et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084670 Tripsas et al. May 2004 A1
20040211329 Funahata et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040233065 Freeman Nov 2004 A1
20040256467 Clemens et al. Dec 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (188)
Number Date Country
1482705 Mar 2004 CN
2102735 Aug 1972 DE
33 38 597 May 1985 DE
41 03 675 Aug 1992 DE
692 32 740 Apr 1993 DE
42 43 832 Jun 1994 DE
43 12 766 Oct 1994 DE
4401089 Jul 1995 DE
19610284 Aug 1996 DE
196 29 291 Jan 1997 DE
195 06 907 Sep 1998 DE
198 52 312 May 1999 DE
198 16 860 Nov 1999 DE
199 18 193 Nov 1999 DE
198 51 703 May 2000 DE
100 06 257 Sep 2000 DE
199 21 024 Nov 2000 DE
199 33 757 Jan 2001 DE
695 19 782 Jan 2001 DE
199 35 527 Feb 2001 DE
199 37 262 Mar 2001 DE
100 12 204 Sep 2001 DE
100 33 112 Jan 2002 DE
201 11 825 Feb 2002 DE
100 43 204 Apr 2002 DE
100 45 192 Apr 2002 DE
100 47 171 Apr 2002 DE
100 58 559 May 2002 DE
100 61 297 Jun 2002 DE
101 17 663 Oct 2002 DE
101 20 687 Oct 2002 DE
101 20 686 Nov 2002 DE
101 51 404 Feb 2003 DE
101 51 440 Feb 2003 DE
101 41 440 Mar 2003 DE
101 63 267 Jul 2003 DE
102 09 400 Oct 2003 DE
102 19 905 Dec 2003 DE
10229168 Jan 2004 DE
103 41 962 Apr 2004 DE
699 13 745 Oct 2004 DE
0 108 650 May 1984 EP
0 128 529 Dec 1984 EP
0 268 370 May 1988 EP
0 268 370 May 1988 EP
0 350 179 Jan 1990 EP
0 418 504 Mar 1991 EP
0 442 123 Aug 1991 EP
0 460 242 Dec 1991 EP
0 501 456 Sep 1992 EP
0 501 456 Sep 1992 EP
0 511 807 Nov 1992 EP
0 528 662 Feb 1993 EP
0 603 939 Jun 1994 EP
0 615 256 Sep 1994 EP
0 685 985 Dec 1995 EP
0 716 458 Jun 1996 EP
0 716 458 Jun 1996 EP
0 785 578 Jul 1997 EP
0 785 578 Jul 1997 EP
0 786 820 Jul 1997 EP
0 690 457 Dec 1999 EP
0 962 984 Dec 1999 EP
0 962 984 Dec 1999 EP
0 966 182 Dec 1999 EP
0 979 715 Feb 2000 EP
0 981 165 Feb 2000 EP
0 989 614 Mar 2000 EP
1 048 912 Nov 2000 EP
1 052 594 Nov 2000 EP
1 065 725 Jan 2001 EP
1 065 725 Jan 2001 EP
1 083 775 Mar 2001 EP
1 102 335 May 2001 EP
1 103 916 May 2001 EP
1 104 035 May 2001 EP
1 113 502 Jul 2001 EP
1 134 694 Sep 2001 EP
1 170 851 Jan 2002 EP
1 224 999 Jul 2002 EP
1227434 Jul 2002 EP
1 237 207 Sep 2002 EP
1 296 280 Mar 2003 EP
1 318 084 Jun 2003 EP
1422168 May 2004 EP
2793089 Nov 2000 FR
723598 Feb 1955 GB
2 058 462 Apr 1981 GB
2001P20024 Aug 2000 GR
2001P03239 Jan 2001 GR
54069392 Jun 1979 JP
60117769 Jun 1985 JP
61001060 Jan 1986 JP
61167854 Jul 1986 JP
62065472 Mar 1987 JP
362065477 Mar 1987 JP
63205943 Aug 1988 JP
01169942 Jul 1989 JP
2969184 Dec 1991 JP
03290976 Dec 1991 JP
05152560 Jun 1993 JP
05259434 Oct 1993 JP
05347422 Dec 1993 JP
08197788 Aug 1995 JP
09083040 Mar 1997 JP
09320760 Dec 1997 JP
10026934 Jan 1998 JP
11238103 Aug 1999 JP
2001085272 Mar 2001 JP
2002183695 Jun 2002 JP
517478 Jan 2003 TW
WO 9316491 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9417556 Aug 1994 WO
WO 9506240 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9531831 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9602924 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9619792 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9712349 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9718944 May 1997 WO
WO 9818156 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9818186 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9840930 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9907189 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9910929 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9910939 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9921233 Apr 1999 WO
WO 9930432 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9939373 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9940631 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9953371 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9954842 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9954936 Oct 1999 WO
WO 9966540 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0007151 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0033063 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0036666 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0079617 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0103126 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0106442 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0108241 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0115233 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0117029 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0117041 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0127998 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0146987 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147044 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147044 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0147045 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0169517 Sep 2001 WO
WO 0173109 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173109 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0205360 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0205361 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0215264 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0217233 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0219443 Mar 2002 WO
WO 0221612 Mar 2002 WO
WO 0229912 Apr 2002 WO
WO 0243071 May 2002 WO
WO 0247183 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02065557 Aug 2002 WO
WO 02071139 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02071505 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02076924 Oct 2002 WO
WO 02091495 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02091495 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02095805 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02095805 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02099907 Dec 2002 WO
WO 02099908 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03027948 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03036686 May 2003 WO
WO 03038897 May 2003 WO
WO 03046922 Jun 2003 WO
WO 03057501 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03067680 Aug 2003 WO
WO 03069552 Aug 2003 WO
WO 03081671 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03095175 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004032257 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004042837 May 2004 WO
WO 2004042837 May 2004 WO
WO 2004047144 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004047144 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004047194 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004047194 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004083859 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2005004194 Jan 2005 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080061986 A1 Mar 2008 US