Inflatable structures, sold by applicant under the trademark AIRBEAM are characterized by low mass, low stowed volume for on-site deployment, overload tolerance and tailored strength and stiffness. Current applications use multiple deploy-strike cycles with inflation pressure maintained while in use.
The known inflatable structures are limited in size and load carrying by both manufacturing limitations and by material properties. This invention overcomes size limitations and improves strength and stiffness of very large inflatable structures.
The known inflatable structures are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,421,128 and 5,735,083. A high bias angle that elongates under pressure provides high bending strength in these structures. This invention, having added external tension elements, provides an increased moment of inertia for even greater strength and stiffness for a given inflatable structure. This invention is applicable to, but not limited to structures for shelters, bridges, deployable wings, and space structures.
This invention uses external bracing tensioned by inflatable structures. The external tensile members are made of high modulus fibers and are spaced away from the central inflatable structure by transverse frames. The structure can be made rigid after deployment by unidirectional bundles of fibers to maximize compression performance after deployment. A truss can be made up of a central inflatable structure or member that is strengthened with external braces made of high modulus fibers spaced away from the central member by transverse frames. A structural member arch can be strengthened using a cable below the member and parallel to it at some distance with spoke-like linear attachments holding the member shape under loads that would tend to collapse the arch. A deployable wing with an inflatable member spar that also relies on span-wise tension in the skin of the wing for maintenance of shape, would operate under the same principle as the other externally braced inflatable structures of this invention.
A truss-like structure is illustrated in
The end transverse frames 2A provide tension to the bracing cables 3 by the action of the central inflatable structure 1 tending to elongate when pressured. The axial reinforcement straps 6 are also tensioned by this action. A designer, by choosing materials with a particular elastic modulus, and by determining the amount of weight per unit length of each material, determines how much tension is carried in the bracing cables 3 compared to the tension carried in the axial reinforcement straps 6, and, thus, tailors the structural properties of the truss-like externally braced structure.
Variations of this embodiment include trusses and beams, similar structures with more than three external cables and optional diagonal cables between transverse frames to increase shear and torsion stiffness and strength.
The various flexible elements of the truss example may be infused with a resin that is controllably hardened to create a permanently rigid structure that does not depend on the maintaining of the inflation pressure. This may be advantageous for very large structures for use in space that can be initially stowed in a small volume for launch.
An arched beam structure is illustrated in
Inflating the inflatable component causes the axial reinforcement strap 12 and the bracing cable 8 to be tensioned. Tension is provided to the axial reinforcement strap 12 and to the bracing cable 8 by the action of the central inflatable structure 7 that elongates and straightens when pressurized. Such action, which the designer controls by choice of the various materials, material weight per unit length, inflatable component 7 diameter, and the offset distance of the bracing cable 8 from the inflatable component 7, determines the strength and stiffness of the arched beam.
Compared to an un-braced inflatable structure, the arched beam of
Variations of the arched beam of
In
Another example of an externally braced inflatable structure is the membrane wing shown in
In the wing example, the benefit of external bracing is not improved structural performance; it is the ability to control the distribution of tension into the wing skin membrane 18 for an aerodynamic benefit.
Variations of the inflatable wing example include additional inflatable elements to further improve membrane shape, the addition of cords or fibers to the membrane in order to tailor its modulus, and ribs that bend or have pivoting means in order to fold the wing flat for storage.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3508270 | Cook | Apr 1970 | A |
4248748 | McGrath et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4662130 | Miura et al. | May 1987 | A |
5421128 | Sharpless et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5559164 | Babu et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5677023 | Brown | Oct 1997 | A |
5735083 | Brown et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6182398 | Head | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6463699 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6685784 | Jacino et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6735920 | Cadogan | May 2004 | B1 |
20010054123 | Henrikson et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20040194397 | Brown et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090199489 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |