The present invention relates generally to high voltage electrical power station, transmission, and distribution systems, and, more particularly, to line arresters for use in protecting such systems.
Externally Gapped Line Arresters (EGLAs) are a type of line arrester used to mitigate the effects of lightning strikes and electrical surges on electrical power line equipment. An EGLA is typically installed in electrical parallel with an insulator that acts to support a power line. With such an EGLA in place, lightning strikes or other types of voltage surges that might cause the insulator to experience flashover are instead diverted to the ground. Damaged equipment and service interruptions are thereby avoided.
While not utilized extensively in the United States, EGLAs have been in production and use in Japan and other foreign countries for several years. A typical EGLA comprises an external gap in series with a series varistor unit (SVU). The SVU, in turn, comprises non-linear metal oxide resistors (MORs) encapsulated in a polymer housing. Because of the non-linear behavior of MORs, the SVU exhibits high resistance at normal operating voltages, but rapidly becomes a low resistance pathway at higher applied voltages such as those produced by lightning strikes. The external gap, because it is arranged in series with the SVU, must spark over before the SVU can begin to conduct electricity.
Unfortunately, it is possible for an SVU in a conventional EGLA to experience a voltage condition during a lightning strike or other surge event sufficient to cause that SVU to fail and not revert back to its original high resistance state when the strike or surge is over. With such a failed SVU, system basic impulse level (BIL) is compromised and the EGLA no longer provides optimal protection for the equipment that it is intended to protect. Nevertheless, because SVUs are normally constructed with polymer housings for purposes of strength and explosion control, there is frequently no obvious outer indication that an SVU has failed. This makes the tracking down and repair of failed EGLAs particularly difficult for the utilities charged with maintaining that equipment.
Embodiments of the present invention provide EGLA designs that may be used to prevent insulators on utility poles from experiencing flashover as a result of lightning strikes or other electrical surge events.
In accordance with aspects of the invention, an arrester for preventing an insulator supporting a power line from experiencing an electrical flashover comprises an electrode, a varistor, and a separating device. The electrode is spaced apart from the power line or a conductor that is electrically tied to the power line so as to define an external gap therebetween. The separating device, in turn, comprises two portions operative to separate from one another when the varistor experiences an electrical condition sufficient to cause the varistor to fail. The electrode, the external gap, the separating device, and the varistor are arranged in electrical series with one another and in electrical parallel with the insulator.
Advantageously, the above-described embodiments provide several benefits over conventional EGLAs. Embodiments of the invention, for example: 1) provide a visual indication after an SVU failure; 2) allow the BIL of the insulator to be restored after an SVU failure to a value that it would have without a line arrester rather than being diminished; 3) do not allow parts to fall to the ground when an SVU failure occurs; and 4) may be configured for use with many different types of insulators.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
The present invention will be described with reference to illustrative embodiments. For this reason, numerous modifications can be made to these embodiments and the results will still come within the scope of the invention. No limitations with respect to the specific embodiments described herein are intended or should be inferred.
The illustrative line arrester 100 comprises an electrode 120, a separating device 125, a strap 130, an SVU 135, and a bracket 140. In the present embodiment, the insulator 105 is what is commonly called a “dead end insulator,” although this choice for the type of insulator is largely arbitrary. The insulator 105 comprises an insulator body 145 terminated at both ends by a respective conductive end fitting. As displayed in
Again referring to
The SVU 135 preferably comprises one or more non-linear resistors (i.e., varistors) that exhibit high resistances at normal applied voltages and much lower resistances at higher applied voltages such as those produced by lightning strikes. The non-linear resistors of the SVU 135, may, for example, comprise one or more metal oxide elements such as, but not limited to, disks formed at least in part by zinc oxide. Commercial sources of suitable SVUs may include, for example, Hubbell Power Systems (Centralia, Mo., USA), ABB (Norwalk, Conn., USA), Siemens AG (Erlangen, Germany), and Cooper Power Systems (Dublin, Ireland). As described earlier, although generally robust, such SVUs may fail (i.e., enter a state wherein they are permanently in a lower resistance state) when exposed to extreme electrical conditions. Accordingly, the SVU 135 is preferably housed in a polymer housing to provide both weatherproofing and strength against electrically-induced explosions.
For electrical continuity between the electrode 120 and the SVU 135, the separating device 125 preferably provides a low resistance pathway for electrical current until it is exposed to a voltage and associated current flow sufficient to cause the SVU 135 to fail. The separating device 125 may, for example, take the form of a conventional ground lead disconnector (also sometimes called an “isolator”). Such ground lead disconnectors are commercially available from, as just two examples, DHGate.com (Beijing, China) and Zhejiang Smico Electric Power Equipment Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang, China).
As will be further described below, the strap 130 is operative to span between the two portions 165, 170 of the separating device 125 after the separating device 125 is activated. Accordingly, the strap 130 preferably comprises a flexible material of sufficient strength to support the weight of at least the second portion 170 and the electrode 120. The strap 130 will also preferably be of a high enough electrical resistance to not act as a significant current pathway in electrical parallel with the separating device 125, while also being sufficiently heat resistant to withstand any heat generated by the separating device 125 and any localized electrical arcing. Suitable materials for the strap 130 may include, as just two examples, Nomex® or Kevlar®, both available from DuPont (Wilmington, Del., USA).
Finally, the electrode 120 and the bracket 140 preferably comprise a conductive material such as brass, iron, aluminum, stainless steel, or the like.
Once so configured, the line arrester 100 may act to protect the insulator 105 from flashover between the line terminal 150 and the earth terminal 155. If a voltage surge is of sufficient amplitude to spark over the insulator 105 across strike distance D0, the surge is instead diverted across external gap 160 into the SVU 135, which almost instantly becomes a low resistance pathway. In this manner, the surge is directed into the bracket 140 and ultimately to the earth terminal 155 (i.e., ground potential), thereby bypassing the insulator 105 altogether. Assuming that the SVU 135 does not fail, the SVU 135 again returns to its high resistance state and cuts off the current flow after the surge charge has been reduced in amplitude, effectively ending the diversion event. The line arrester 100 remains intact and ready to divert additional surges as necessary.
If, instead, the electrical surge is sufficient to fail the SVU 135, a very different sequence of events occurs. In response to the overloading of the SVU 135, the separating device 125 preferably activates and separates into the first portion 165 and the second portion 170, as detailed above. The first portion 165 of the separating device 125 remains coupled to the SVU 135, while the second portion 170 remains coupled to the electrode 120. Gravity or, alternatively, a non-conductive spring built into the separating device 125, then causes the second portion 170 and the electrode 120 to fall away from the remainder of the line arrester 100 until their fall is arrested by the strap 130. At the end of this sequence of events, the second portion 170 of the separating device 125 and the electrode 120 end up suspended from the first portion 165 of the separating device 125 by the strap 130. Such a “failed” condition is shown in the perspective view in
Notably, the illustrative line arrester 100 provides several advantages when compared to a conventional EGLA. With the electrode 120 suspended below the remainder of the line arrester 100 after failure of the SVU 135, as shown in
What is more, the illustrative line arrester 100 is also advantageous because the portions of the line arrester 100 suspended by the strap 130 after a failure, namely, the second portion 170 of the separating device 125 and the electrode 120, provide an excellent visual indicator that the line arrester 100 has been overloaded, which is not present in conventional EGLAs. Such a visual indicator, which may be seen at substantial distances, makes the discovery and repair of failed line arresters such as the line arrester 100 substantially easier. At the same time, the strap 130 assures that no parts are allowed to depart the line arrester 100 and fall from the utility pole 115 when a failure occurs. Thus, people and property underneath the utility pole 115 are protected from falling objects.
Nevertheless, in the line arrester 600, the separating device 615 and the strap 620 are coupled between the SVU 625 and the bracket 630 rather than being coupled between the SVU 625 and the electrode 610 in the manner of the line arrester 100. Accordingly, upon failure of the SVU 625 and the activation of the separating device 615, the SVU 625 and the electrode 610 end up suspended below the remainder of the line arrester 600, as shown in the perspective view in
While the previous two illustrative embodiments were described in terms of protecting a dead end type of insulator (i.e., insulators 105 and 635), aspects of the invention may be utilized with a wide assortment of different types of insulators that are commonly mounted on utility poles. These include, but art not limited to post-type, suspension-type, pin-type, and crossarm-type insulators, and the like. Such insulators and other aspects of power transmission and distribution are described in, for example, A. R. Hileman, Insulation Coordination for Power Systems, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1999, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
As even another example,
In closing, it should again be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the invention are intended to be illustrative only. Other embodiments can use different types and arrangements of elements for implementing the described functionality, and these numerous alternative embodiments within the scope of the appended claims will be apparent to one skilled in the art. In addition, it is reiterated that all the features disclosed herein may be replaced by alternative features serving the same, equivalent, or similar purposes, unless expressly stated otherwise. Thus, unless expressly stated otherwise, each feature disclosed is one example only of a generic series of equivalent or similar features.
Moreover, any element in a claim that does not explicitly state “means for” performing a specified function or “step for” performing a specified function is not to be interpreted as a “means for” or “step for” clause as specified in 35 U.S.C. §112, Paragraph 6. In particular, the use of “step of” in the claims herein is not intended to invoke the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, Paragraph 6.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61390218 | Oct 2010 | US |