The invention relates generally to a food product and its method of manufacture.
There are many food products, such as fruit snacks, spicy treats and sour food products, available on the market today. For example, there are many known sour candies on the market today such as Sour Tarts, Sour Patch Kids and the like. For each of these different food products, the food product has been designed to have a specific amount or level of sourness. However, none of these existing food products have a plurality of pieces of food product wherein each piece of food product has a different (increased or decreased) level of taste intensity wherein the taste intensity may be sourness or spiciness. In addition, none of these existing food products including candies have a piece of food product that can reduce the taste intensity of the other pieces of food products. It is desirable to provide a food product that has multiple pieces of food products with different levels of intensity and a piece of food product that can reduce the intensity of the other pieces of the food product.
Conventionally, a sour food product is made by a process in which sugar is cooked and an acid is added at the end of the cooking process or acid is added to the exterior of the food product. The problem with these conventional sour food product is that the mixture of sugar used as a base, heat (to cook the food product) and acid (to make the food product sour) contribute to an inversion of sugar which greatly shortens the shelf life of the food product, such as candy. The inversion of sugar is the conversion of sucrose to glucose and fructose, resulting in the liquefaction of the “sugars” in the food product. This liquefaction of the food product makes it unsuitable for normal distribution because it causes the food product to soften or liquefy within several weeks or months. Sugar inversion is directly proportional to the amount of hydrogen ions present in the food product wherein the inversion of sugar occurs more quickly when more hydrogen ions are present. In a sour food product, as the pH drops (i.e. as the sour level increases) the rate of inversion increases. Furthermore, the heat and humidity in the cooking process and in the ambient environment in which the final product rests can accelerate this inversion process. It is desirable to produce a sour food product that reduces the inversion of sugar so that the sour food product has a longer shelf life.
In addition, it is desirable to create other food products that have high intensity, such as high sourness or spiciness. Thus, it is desirable to have a high intensity food product that has a piece of food product that can reduce the intensity or extinguish the intensity of the food product and a method for manufacturing the extinguisher food product. It is to this end that the present invention is directed.
The invention is particularly applicable to a sour extinguisher food product with the particular pieces of food product and method of manufacture set forth below and it is in this context that the invention will be described. It will be appreciated, however, that the extinguisher food product in accordance with the invention has greater utility since the extinguisher food product may be made with a different number of pieces of food product (from 1 to hundreds) wherein each different piece of food product has a different intensity level (which may be sourness or spiciness), may be made with different ingredients/components and may be made with different manufacturing techniques and those changes are within the scope of the invention as those changes would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
The extinguisher food product snack also may be a fruit snack or other snack and can be a chewy snack, such as licorice, a gummy or “chew”/taffy-like texture. The snack may also be one or more pieces of gum. The snack may be fortified in some way and use some amount of real fruit or fruit juice. The snack can be manufactured in various formats. For example, the snack can be made as strips, twisted strips, pieces, a roll or a snack that has a liquid center that is released when the person eating the snack bites into the snack. The intensity levels of the pieces of the snack may be formulated to be contained in each piece, but the components that change the intensity level of each piece of the snack can also be applied to an outer surface of the snack such as by using a coating or a dusting.
In one embodiment, the extinguisher food product may be known as “Sour Extinguisher” candy and may provide a flavorful, interactive and participatory play experience. The market has a need for this play experience using the extinguisher food product and the extinguisher food product fulfills that need. The Sour Extinguisher may include four fruit flavors/colors including three sour fruit flavors of Tangy Tangerine, Super Sour Lemon and Tongue Twisting Lime with increasing levels of sourness. For example, the Super Sour Lemon will be very sour for many children and Tongue Twisting Lime will be extremely sour for the person eating the piece of candy. As children eat the various sour flavors, they can create a variety of sour level experiences. Then, once they have achieved the desired sour level, or reached their maximum tolerance, they can eat a Cool Blue Raspberry extinguisher piece to quickly douse the sourness of the other pieces of candy thereby providing the play experience not available in the market. As shown in
The “Challenge” for the play experience using the extinguisher food product is to see if the eater can “make it through” all of the sour levels (three in the exemplary embodiment). Then, the extinguisher candy can be eaten by the child who either can't “make it through” all of the sour levels (and needs sour relief) or when the child has made it through all of the sour levels and eats the extinguisher candy as a reward. Furthermore, combining the highest sour level pieces of candy (such as by eating more than one piece of candy at the same time) can create an “extreme” sour experience for the ultimate challenge. The extinguisher candy uniquely calls upon a child's competitive instinct with themselves, their peers and/or their parents. The game play experience variations provided by the extinguisher food product/candy may include: 1) can you handle the intensity level of the pieces of food product and then consume the extinguisher piece to reduce the intensity level once the person has reached his taste intensity limit; 2) combine the pieces of candy to create more intense taste levels and then consume the extinguisher piece to reduce the intensity level once the person has reached his taste intensity limit; and 3) a social play experience in which people are each handed a random piece of the different intensity level pieces and then see who can handle the intensity level of the piece being eaten. Now, a method for producing the extinguisher candy will be described in more detail.
For both the cold process and the cooked process, the manufacturing process of the extinguisher candy overcomes the problem of reduced shelf life described above for typical sour candies by retarding the sugar inversion. Thus, the manufacturing process results in reducing sugar inversion which in turn results in less hydrolysis and therefore an increase in shelf life over the conventional sour candies.
As shown in
In step 24, the mixed ingredients for the cores of the candy are permitted to rest for a specified period of time (preferably 2-3 hours) prior to being cut or molded into shape which is a novel process step for manufacturing a sour candy. This step allows for the moisture levels to stabilize, thereby, reducing the incidence of cold flow which is the movement of a candy from one shape to another with no external forces (other than gravity) acting thereon. In step 26, once the mixed ingredients have rested, the core of each piece of candy is produced by forming and/or cutting the mixed ingredients into pieces. In one embodiment, each piece of sour candy 121-123 may be manufactured using the same core (to reduce manufacturing costs), but it is also possible to make each piece of candy 121-123 with a different core wherein each core for each piece of candy has a different level of sourness by using one or more acids (as described below) for each core. In addition, extinguisher piece may be manufactured using its own core.
In step 28, once the cores of the pieces of candy are made, the cores for the sour pieces may be put through a hard panning process. The hard panning process in conjunction with the one or more acids as described below produce the bumpy pieces of candy as shown in
In order to achieve the desired sourness of the extinguisher candy, one or more acids are used wherein prolonged sourness and/or tartness is achieved because of an overlap of the acid release times. In more detail, a mixture of different types of acids results in a sequential acid release of sourness and tartness that work with the citrus profile of the flavors. The multiple acids provide an extinguisher candy with an optimal taste for a specific period of time. In an exemplary embodiment, the extinguisher candy may use four different acids (including tartaric acid, citric acid, lactic acid and fumaric acid) to create a different sour sensation and intensity level in the mouth. The tartaric acid creates an immediate spike of sour and tartness. Then, as the tartaric acid starts to fade, the citric acid is sharp, astringent and works best with citrus flavors. The lactic acid (milder but lingering) elongates the sour sensation as does the fumaric acid which has a delayed but “clean” tartness. For the Sour Extinguisher example set forth above, the Tangy Tangerine piece contains only the citric acid, the Super Sour Lemon piece contains the citric and fumaric acids (and the fumaric acid in powdered/granular form is used during the hard panning process to coat the core) and the Tongue Twisting Lime piece (the sourest piece) uses citric, fumaric and tartaric acids (and the fumaric and tartaric acids in powdered/granular form are used during the hard panning process to coat the core).
For the exemplary embodiment of the extinguisher candy (the Sour Extinguisher), each piece of sour candy (Tangy Tangerine, Super Sour Lemon and Tongue Twisting Lime) may have the following ingredients (as an approximate percentage of the total ingredients in each piece of candy wherein the total percentage may be slightly more than or less than 100 due to rounding off of the percentages for each ingredient) in the core and in the shell of each piece of candy:
The core of each piece of candy in Table 1 has the same ingredients, but the percentages for each different piece of candy are different since each candy has a different coating (coated onto each piece of candy during the hard panning process) which affects the percentage for each ingredient. In addition, the formulation set forth in Tables 1 and 2 are merely an example of the formulation of each piece of candy and the invention is not limited to the particular formulation set forth in Tables 1 and 2. In this example, the least sour piece of candy has one type of acid, the middle level of sourness piece of candy has two types of acid and the most sour piece of candy has four types of acid which partially accounts for the different levels of sourness for each piece of candy.
The extinguisher piece of candy (Cool Blue Raspberry) may have the following ingredients (again as a percentage of the total ingredients in the piece of candy wherein the total percentage may be slightly more than or less than 100 due to rounding off of the percentages for each ingredient) in the core and in the shell of the extinguisher piece of candy:
As with Table 1, Table 2 shows the ingredients listed as a percentage of the total weight of the extinguisher piece of candy.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, during the manufacturing process, a first set of mixed ingredients, a second set of mixed ingredients, a third set of mixed ingredients and a fourth set of mixed ingredients may be formed wherein the three different sourness level pieces of candy are produced from the first, second and third set of mixed ingredients, respectively and the extinguisher candy is made from the fourth set of mixed ingredients since each different piece of candy has a slightly different set of ingredients for the core. If an extinguisher candy with a different number of sour pieces of candy or a different extinguisher candy (such as a drink extinguisher), then a different number of sets of mixed ingredients may be generated during the manufacturing process and those different number of sets of mixed ingredients are within the scope of the invention.
In the above manufacturing process, to make the piece of the extinguisher candy extremely sour and prevent sucrose inversion, the process minimizes the exposure of the extinguisher candy to high temperatures (when using the cold process), uses ingredients in dry, powdered or granular form to reduce moisture in the final product, adds buffer salts such as citrates or lactates and hard pans with a very high level/mix of hydrophobic acids. When using a cooked core process, the core is sealed to prevent the sucrose inversion.
In alternative embodiments, the extinguisher candy may also have any number of piece of candy with each piece of candy having a different level of sourness wherein three levels is preferred (as described above), but 2 or more levels of sourness may be used for the extinguisher candy. In another alternative embodiment, the extinguisher candy may use the sour pieces of candy as described above, but have a drink instead of the extinguisher piece of candy. The drink may be juicy and/or sweet drink that reduces the sourness. Alternatively, the extinguisher candy may be one or more sour tablets that dissolve in a glass of liquid to create drinks with different sourness levels and then a sugar tablet that dissolves into the liquid and reduces the sourness of the drink.
The extinguisher candy described above is a candy in which the levels of sourness of the pieces of candy are varied and the extinguisher piece of candy reduces the sourness. The extinguisher candy may also be created wherein each piece has a spicy/hot sensation wherein the pieces of candy have different levels of spiciness/hotness and the extinguisher piece reduces the spiciness/hotness of the pieces of candy. The same “game” as described above for the sour pieces of candy can also be played using these spicy pieces of candy.
In addition to the embodiments described above, the food product may be a single piece with two different features/components/(whatever the right word is) wherein one feature includes sensory property or properties, such as bitter, salt, sour, or heat, and another feature that helps reduce the sensory property(ies). For example, in the case of a spicy hard candy, the outer layer of the spicy hard candy could have sensory property(ies) such as capsaicin that creates a heat sensation in the mouth. After the sucking on the candy, the user may want to reduce the effects, including taste, of the sensory properties. Therefore, biting into the center of the piece that has an “extinguisher” effect would be a benefit. The extinguishing effect is a perceived reduction in the original sensory properties. The extinguisher effect could be accomplished with hard, soft, spray, gel, liquid or other edible textures.
In this embodiment, which is an alternative to the aforementioned embodiment, the food product may have a single piece with two different features in which the one feature is designed to increase in sensory intensity so long as the user continues to interact with it (e.g., suck on it in the mouth) and the other feature has a reducing effect on the sensory intensity. The increase in the intensity or sensory properties may be increased by: 1) designing the sensory portion to have several different layers with different formulae in each layer; or 2) the sensory portion includes an ingredient like menthol that increases in intensity through increased, accumulating exposure to it.
In this proposed embodiment, the single food product piece is constructed so that the extinguisher component is built separately from the intense component and later assembled or affixed to the intense component. Because the two components are separately constructed, each can be formulated and processed to achieve maximum benefit effect and delivery. A number of highly different formulation and physical characteristics for each of the separate components can be achieved in this manner that would not be possible with in-situ processing. Additionally, a number of assembly mechanisms can be employed to create the final physical product design that would not be achievable through in-situ processing.
For example, in this new embodiment the extinguisher can be a separately constructed using an encapsulant such as gelatin, which can be cold formed around the extinguisher material similar as in the way a cough or cold remedy liquid gel capsule is formed. The capsule then can be affixed to the intense candy component. The candy could be made in a ring formation and the extinguisher capsule could be made in a size such that it fits inside the ring and is bonded by heat or sugar/water solution or an edible adhesive. The user could simply bite into the encapsulate to release the extinguisher, which could be in the form of a liquid rather than a gel as might be required by in-situ processing.
An additional example is that the extinguisher could also be the same shape as the intense component and affixed to the candy as previously discussed. The extinguisher “package” can be made of any edible polymer or naturally occurring edible material and contain the extinguisher material. Or, the extinguisher can be made of any shape and affixed to the intense portion. Neither of these approaches would be possible with in-situ processing.
In this embodiment, the food product may also have a two piece solution in which one piece features the sensory effect and the other is the extinguisher piece that when eaten reduces the sensory effects of the first piece. For example, in the embodiment of a two piece food product, a person with a cold may want to have one food piece that provides sensory property(ies) that help sooth symptoms like cough, sinus congestion or sore throat, and then have a separate food piece (which could be hard, soft, spray, gel, etc) that helps reduce the sensory properties. For example, in the case of cough drops, one piece may include sensory properties based on menthol that help reduce clear sinuses. After the symptoms have subsided, the user may want to reduce the effects, including taste, of the menthol. Therefore, eating a second piece that reduces the sensory effects of the menthol would be a benefit.
In this embodiment, which is an alternative to the aforementioned embodiment, the food product may have a two piece solution in which the piece featuring the sensory effect is designed to increase in sensory intensity so long as the user continues to interact with it (e.g., suck on it in the mouth) and the other piece is designed to reduce effect on the sensory intensity. The increase in the intensity or sensory properties may be increased by: 1) designing the sensory piece to have several different layers with different formulae in each layer; or 2) the sensory pieces includes an ingredient like menthol that increases in intensity through increased, accumulating exposure to it.
In this embodiment, the any of the aforementioned food products may also supply a secondary flavor or active ingredient in the extinguisher piece, component or feature. This secondary flavoring would be of sufficient amount that it would detectable by the user. Additionally the flavor could also incorporate a secondary active, sensory ingredient that could provide a benefit such as treating a sore throat or sore mouth. For example, if an ingredient such as a capsaicin were included as the secondary flavor, it would provide an experience, depending on the amount provided, ranging from warming relief to fiery hot.
This would provide the consumer with three sensations: (1) first is the original intense flavor, (2) secondly the reducing of the intensity, and (3) thirdly the next flavor or sensory experience.
While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular embodiment of the invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority under 35 USC 120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/656,652, filed on Jan. 23, 2007 entitled “Extinguisher Food Product and Method of Manufacture” which in turn claims the benefits under 35 USC 119(e) and 120 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/761,983, filed on Jan. 24, 2006 entitled “Extinguisher Candy and Method of Manufacture” and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/850,616 filed on Oct. 10, 2006 entitled “Extinguisher Food Product and Method of Manufacture”, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60761983 | Jan 2006 | US | |
60850616 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11656652 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12147334 | US |