1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to firearms, and more specifically to extractors for firearms.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Many current model handguns suffer from problems involving the ejection of the spent casings after firing. Particularly, many handgun models will exhibit erratic ejection or failed ejection. Beyond being simply annoying, erratic ejection can be dangerous as hot spent cartridges can fly onto the user's body or face or onto other nearby people, inflicting pain, startling the person, forcing the person to close their eyes, or exposing the person's eyes or airways to debilitating burning fumes and powders. In a combat or competition situation, this problem can be particularly dangerous as the distraction or debilitation of coming in contact with spent casings can expose the user or others to an enemy or cause the user or others to lose a competition. Further, failed ejections can require the user to physically remove or repair the firearm prior to shooting again, which is an option that simply might not be available in a combat or competition setting. Further, this problem can be exacerbated when using smaller caliber firearms, such as 9 mm. The problems can also become increasingly prevalent the more the firearm is used, often making the firearm unusable with any regularity after 1,500 to 2,000 shots.
Previous solutions have included modifying the ejector and cutting notches into breech walls and/or side walls of the slide. However, these solutions have failed to alleviate the problem with any significance or regularity. Further, the solution of cutting notches will require expensive re-tooling of slide manufacturing parts and is not easy or inexpensive to retrofit into an existing firearm, typically requiring replacement of the entire slide.
Therefore, there exists a desire for a solution to the problem of erratic ejection patterns and failed ejections that is inexpensive, versatile, and easily implemented in both new and existing firearms.
Several embodiments of the invention advantageously address the needs above as well as other needs by providing an extractor for a firearm and method of using the same. The extractor comprises a bullet casing engagement edge that is configured to engage an extractor groove an/or a casing rim of the bullet casing to extract the casing rearward from a barrel opening during recoil. In one aspect, the casing engagement edge comprises an upper portion having a substantially straight edge portion and configured to engage the casing and enable it to travel vertically along the upper portion while maintaining engagement therewith. In another aspect, the engagement edge also comprises a tab portion situated below and extending outward from the upper portion. The tab portion is also configured to engage the extractor grove and/or casing rim and to inhibit the bullet casing from traveling vertically downward along the casing engagement edge below the tab portion.
In a further embodiment, the tab portion of the casing engagement edge comprises a concave edge upper portion with an arc having a radius approximately equal or similar to a radius of the bullet casing, the casing extractor groove, or the casing rim.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of several embodiments of the present invention will be more apparent from the following more particular description thereof, presented in conjunction with the following drawings.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding components throughout the several views of the drawings. Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of various embodiments of the present invention. Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in a commercially feasible embodiment are often not depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodiments of the present invention.
The following description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of describing the general principles of exemplary embodiments. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the claims.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of various mechanical structures, components, settings, measurements, materials, finishes, manufacturing methods, operations, and the like to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
Referring first to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
After ejection, a new cartridge comprising the bullet and casing 208 are moved upward from the magazine 128 into the bullet chamber. The slide 110, under compression force by the recoil spring 116, moves forward and pushed the new bullet and casing 208 forward into the rear opening of the barrel 114 by interference between the breech wall 204 of the slide 110 within the bullet chamber and the rear surface 410 of the new casing 208. The slide 110 will continue its forward travel and the rear portion of the barrel 114 will articulate back up and will receive the bullet. Upon completion of the slide's 110 forward travel the firearm 100 will ready to be fired once again.
As was mentioned in the background, erratic ejection patters and failed ejection are both annoying and dangers to user of firearms 100 and individuals in close proximity to them. Currently, modern striker-fired handgun manufactures have failed to solve the problem, and other previous solutions have failed to remedy this problem with any significance or regularity.
The applicant has determined that a root cause of these problems is that upon recoil, while the casing 208 is being extracted from the downwardly articulated barrel 114, the casing 208 can dip below a certain position, which causes a host of different problems. First, if the casing 208 is below the certain position when the rear of the casing 208 impacts the ejector 118, which is stationary with respect to the frame 122, that impact point will be higher on the rear surface 410 of the casing 208. This in turn decreases the angle at which the casing 208 is ejected and causes the casing 208 to eject in a more sideways fashion rather than vertical or diagonal, which is more ideal. As multiple different casings 208 are fired and drop below the above referenced certain position by varying amounts, the ejector 118 will impact the different casings 208 at different points on their rear surfaces 410 causing the spent casings 208 to eject at different angles resulting in an erratic ejection patter. Further, if the angle of ejection is too divergent, the casings 208 can reflect off of various surfaces of the chamber or ejection port 112 and result in a failed ejection such as stove piping (where the casing 208 becomes trapped between the barrel 114 and the breech wall 204 or the rear surface of the ejection port 112) or simply a failing to extract.
Second, if the casing 208 drops down far enough, it can lose contact with the engagement edge 408 of the extractor 102. If the rear surface 410 of the casing 208 impacts the ejector 118 without maintaining contact with the engagement edge 408, the casing 208 will have nothing about which to rotate or pivot during ejection and the casing 208 can be ejected at a random angle or fail to eject all together. Alternatively, if the casing 208 loses contact or engagement with the extractor 102, the casing 208 may not fully extract from the barrel 114 and may remain in the barrel 114 upon completion of recoil, thereby preventing the next round from entering the barrel 114 and disabling the firearm 100 until such time as the casing can be removed manually.
Third, as the casing 208 drops down during recoil, the casing 208 can rely upon an upward force exerted on the bottom of the casing 208 by the magazine spring 129. This upward force can cause the casing 208 to bounce upward in a sporadic manner, thus adding to the erratic ejection pattern and ejection failure possibility. Further, this upward force is not consistent as rounds are emptied out of the magazine 128 and the magazine spring 129 decompresses and exerts less upward force on the casing 208. While firing the last rounds of the magazine 128, the magazine spring 129 will exert the least amount of upward force on the casing 208 and may allow the casing 208 to drop even lower, thus causing more potential for erratic or failed ejection as the magazine 129 is unloaded.
Fourth, due to manufacturing tolerances, some firearms 100 will articulate the rearward portion of the barrel 114 down further than others, thus resulting in higher probability of erratic and failed ejections.
Fifth, wear over time will exasperate the above identified problems. Particularly, the engagement edge 408 can begin to burnish (i.e., become polished), at which point the friction to hold the casing 208 at or above the referenced certain position is decreased and the casing 208 is more likely to drop below this position, resulting in the above described problems. Also, if the extractor 102 exists in the slide 110 in an angled configuration (see
Sixth, some manufactures have included a visual loaded chamber indicator feature to their firearms 100. This feature is affected by angling the engagement edge 408 of the extractor 102 to face slightly downward. By this, as the casing 208 travels upward on the engagement edge 408 when the barrel 114 articulates upward and the firearm 100 enters the battery position, the casing 208, opposed by the breech sidewall 402, pushes the extractor 102 outward so that a lateral exterior surface 606 (see
The applicant has determined that a way to alleviate these problems is to prevent the casing 208 from dropping below too low and especially to prevent the casing 208 from dropping below the lowest point where it maintains engagement with the engagement edge 408 of the extractor 102 during recoil. Thus, the following modified extractor 102 is hereby disclosed.
Referring now to
By one embodiment, the extractor 102 is angled so as to exist in the extractor slot 202 of the slide 110 at an angle relative to a lateral axis of the firearm 100 (see
As the bullet casing 208 enters the chamber from the magazine 128 below and begins to the engage the casing engagement edge 408 of the extractor 102 and causes the extractor 102 to articulate outward to accommodate the casing 208, an advantage exists to the angular configuration when in that a force between the top surface 612 of the extractor 102 or a top surface of the support portion 616 of the extractor 102 is reduced and the extractor 102 is able to more easily articulate outward to accommodate the casing 208 incoming from below. This can allow for less friction and force resisting the entry of the casing 208 into the chamber from below as well as reduce wear and failure. Example firearms 100 with such an angled configuration include various ones of the Glock® family of handguns including but not limited to generation 3 and 4 9 mm, 0.40, and 0.45 handguns.
In other embodiments, however, the extractor 102 may be situated in the extractor slot 202 in the slide 110 in a manner that is parallel to the lateral axis of the firearm 100 (i.e., straight-in) or closer to parallel than is illustrated in
With reference now to
The upper portion 702 with the substantially straight edge portion 704 is configured to engage the casing extractor groove 404 or the casing rim 406 and enable the casing 208 to travel vertically along the upper portion 702 while maintaining engagement therewith.
Referring now to
With continuing reference to
By some embodiments, the tab portion 706 is configured such that it will maintain this engagement at least during a segment of the recoil action leading up to the exertion of the ejection force on the bullet casing 208 by the ejector 118. By at least one embodiment, the tab portion 706 exerts an upward force 902 on the bullet casing 208 during this segment leading up to the exertion of the ejection force on the rear surface 410 of the casing 208 by the ejector 118. By another embodiment, this upward force 902 is greater than approximately 3 pounds, and by another embodiment is greater than approximately 4 pounds, though other upward force values may be possible and appropriate. By the tab portion 706 maintaining its engagement with extractor groove 404 or casing rim 406 of the casing 208, and even exerting the upward force 902 upon the casing 208 leading up to impact with the ejector 118, the tab portion 706 not only ensures that the casing 208 does not drop too low, but the tab portion 706 will locate the casing 208 in a consistent location with respect to the ejector 118 time after time, resulting in a highly consistent ejection pattern with extremely low ejection failure rate. By one embodiment, the tab portion 706 consistently locates the casing 208 such that the ejector 118 consistently impacts the rear surface 410 of the casings 208 at a position in a slice of the rear surface 410 between 90 degrees and 150 degrees (assuming straight up is 0 degrees). More specifically, the casing 208 is consistently located such that the ejector 118 impacts the rear surface 410 of the casing 208 at around 120 degrees.
By another embodiment, as a result of such consistent location, the ejection pattern comprises ejecting the bullet casing 208 consistently between approximately 120 degrees and 165 degrees from the ejection port 112 as viewed from above with the front of the barrel 114 indicating 0 degrees. So configured, the casings 208 will eject to the right side of the user, landing next to or slightly behind the user.
Referring now to
To further avoiding stress points, the concave edge portion may be substantially tangential to the substantially straight edge portion 704. This is illustrated by the dashed line 1006 representing the imaginary continuance of the substantially straight edge portion 704 and the concave edge portion's 708 relation thereto.
By another embodiment, the arc of the concave edge portion 708 of the upper portion 710 of the tab portion 706 has a central angle 1008 of approximately between 28 and 38 degrees. By other embodiments, the central angle 1008 is between 30 and 36 degrees, or between 32 and 34 degrees, or is approximately 32.5 degrees. By yet another embodiment, an extractor 102 suited for a 9 mm casing and possibly for use in a Glock® semi-automatic 9 mm handgun, may have an arc length of approximately 0.05 inches. Other handgun manufactures and models, such the Smith & Wesson® M&P® line of handguns, may employ extractors 102 with a longer engagement edge 408 to engage the casing 208, thus allowing for a larger arc central angle 1008 or arc length. The measurements disclosed herein may be ideally suited for a Glock® using a 9 mm casing 208, but may be scaled as appropriate when using larger shells or firearms with larger casing engagement edges 408.
In a further embodiment, the tab portion 706 further comprises the rounded convex edge portion 712 configured to engage the extractor groove 404 and/or the casing rim 406 of the casing 208 and to enable the casing 208 to travel vertically upward along the tab portion 706 of the casing engagement edge 408. After a casing 208 is ejected and the next casing 208 is rising out of the magazine 128, the new casing 208 will align with and engage the casing engagement edge 408 from the lower outer portion 714 of the tab portion 706 and slide upward toward the substantially straight edge portion 704. Thus, the tab portion 706 allows a cartridge to slide upward along the breech sidewall 402 relatively unhindered, but prevents the casing 208 from slipping below the lowest contact point with the casing engagement edge 408 as the barrel 114 articulates downward during recoil. The tab portion 706 also consistently locates the casing 208 relative to the ejector 118 to result in a more consistent and reliable ejection pattern.
By including the tab portion 706 as described herein in its various embodiments on the engagement edge 408 of the extractor 102, an efficient solution is provided that remedies the problems identified above. In particular, the tab portion 706 remedies the problems caused by the casing 208 dropping too low, loosing engagement with the casing engagement edge 408 of the extractor 102, or interacting with the magazine spring 129. Also, by simply changing one relatively inexpensive part rather than multiple expensive parts, the presented solution is efficient, economical, and easy to implement. Further, because the tab portion 706 will set the lower distance which the casing 208 may travel downward, many of the other issues identified above as exasperating factors, such as poor manufacturing tolerances, wear of the extractor 102, and incorporation of a visual loaded chamber indicator, are all by eliminated from concern as they cannot and do not override the downward-movement-limiting effect of the tab portion 706. Moreover, the disclosed design can be modified to incorporate the visual chamber indicator feature as the downward force exerted by a downward angled substantially straight edge portion 704 of the engagement edge 408 does not exceed the upward force 902 exerted by the tab portion 706 on the casing 208, and thus, will not push the casing 208 below the tab portion 706 and out of engagement with the casing engagement edge 408.
While the invention herein disclosed has been described by means of specific embodiments, examples and applications thereof, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention set forth in the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1317587 | Mercie | Sep 1919 | A |
2870562 | Kimball | Jan 1959 | A |
2894346 | Smith | Jul 1959 | A |
3733729 | Baker | May 1973 | A |
3882625 | Tellie | May 1975 | A |
4342169 | Lichtman | Aug 1982 | A |
5355768 | Felk | Oct 1994 | A |
5410831 | Felk | May 1995 | A |
5655326 | Levavi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5678340 | Moon | Oct 1997 | A |
5794373 | Moon | Aug 1998 | A |
6256915 | da Silveira | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6560909 | Cominolli | May 2003 | B2 |
6851212 | Szabo | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6966137 | Gussalli Beretta | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7322143 | Rohrbaugh et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7380362 | Curry et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7383655 | McGarry | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7478494 | Zeh | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7774970 | McGarry | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8028454 | Pontillo, II | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8156677 | Glock | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20020194762 | Cominolli | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040159032 | Szabo | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050115127 | Szabo | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050229456 | McGarry | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050229458 | McGarry | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060185212 | Curry et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090071053 | Thomele et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100192438 | McGarry | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100263254 | Glock | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120167427 | Zukowski et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120317856 | Burke et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140137454 A1 | May 2014 | US |