The present invention relates to cleanroom ceilings. More specifically, it relates to cleanroom ceiling suspension systems from which you can drop a ceiling from a ceiling structure and suspend the ceiling with an interstitial space between the structure above and the bottom-load ceiling system.
Extruded aluminum ceilings are widely used in cleanrooms that perform semiconductor manufacturing processes. In such a ceiling, extruded aluminum members, shaped as inverted “tee”s, are hung from the building structure above, thus forming an interstitial space in between the ceiling and the building structure.
Main tees and cross tees are usually configured in a 2′×4′ or 4′×4′ layout. Fan Filter Units (FFUs), blank pans, and lighting units then rest on the flanges of the tees. In addition, current cleanroom ceilings are generally required to carry the additional burden of Automated Material Handling Systems (AMHS) hung from below the ceiling grid.
Unlike conventional ceilings, which are quite static, cleanroom ceilings are in a constant state of change. Thus, the ceilings in cleanrooms must be easily configurable in order to adapt to changing needs.
One particular problem in current ceilings is that equipment, due to its size and weight, must sometimes be installed from below. This often forces installers to work at awkward angles to enable the equipment to pass through the grid before being leveled and lowered onto the grid. If the interstitial space is limited due to ductwork or the structure above, it may be impossible to install the equipment from below in the manner described.
Another requirement is that the ceiling be sufficiently strong to support the necessary equipment and allow maintenance personnel to move within the interstitial space to install and maintain equipment such as FFUs. A ceiling must also be strong enough to support AMHS hangers from below.
Most existing extruded aluminum ceilings are suspended on a 4′×4′ hanger layout in order to provide this type of strength. This, however, is expensive because of the number of hanger rods or anchoring rods required. It is also restrictive of the interstitial space and may present problems when installing mechanical ductwork and piping.
The speed and consequent expense of the installation and reconfiguration of extruded aluminum ceilings are overriding considerations in the cleanroom context. It is advantageous to supply a ceiling at an affordable price. It is equally important that the maintenance or installation not unnecessarily delay the operation of a cleanroom. Semiconductor prices are volatile and time sensitive. As such, interruptions or delays in the manufacturing process can be devastating. Thus, the speed of installation and reconfiguration is directly linked with the expense of the ceiling.
Another important aspect of ceilings is the number of parts involved in installation. Parts inventory can be very costly. If pieces are late or missing the entire installation process can come to a standstill. This is amplified in a cleanroom where every part must be wiped down (cleaned) prior to entering the cleanroom.
Accordingly, a need exists for an extruded aluminum ceiling that is easily configurable, sufficiently strong, and affordable and easy to install.
The present invention has been developed in response to the present state of the art, and in particular, in response to the problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully resolved by currently available extruded aluminum ceilings.
The bottom-load ceiling is an extruded aluminum gasket tee bar ceiling. The pre-assembled cross tees are connected to the main tees using a cam-lock device that quickly locks the cross tees into position with a half turn of a cone point set screw at each end of each cross tee. The cam-lock ceiling connection reduces the time to install the present invention to approximately ⅓ of the time it takes to install a comparable cleanroom ceiling. In this way, the ceiling is easily configurable. In addition, it reduces the number of necessary parts as it utilizes parts common to an existing wall system using the same battens/flanges and closure pieces.
The main tees of the present invention may be hung on 4′ centers or on 8′ centers. Installing on 8′ centers reduces the number of hanger rods or anchoring rods by up to 75%, reducing clutter in the interstitial space and eliminating the associated expense. The ceiling is specifically designed for supporting AMHS below the ceiling grid.
The grid is compatible with the retrofit “Backbone” designed to increase the carrying capacity of the grid. This backbone, or grid stiffener, may be customized for just a portion of the ceiling requiring extra carrying capacity, thus making it more affordable and easily configurable as well as very strong.
The inverted “tee” flanges are removable so filters/FFUs and blank pans may be installed from below without the need of jockeying them through the grid at awkward angles prior to their being set onto the grid. These removable flanges enable installers to more easily, and consequently more affordably, install equipment from below while in a level position.
These and other features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
In order that the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages of the invention are obtained will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. All changes and alternatives that would be known to one of skill in the art are embraced within the scope of the invention.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. While the various aspects of the embodiments are presented in drawings, the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale unless specifically indicated.
The extruded aluminum bottom-load ceiling is an extruded aluminum gasket tee bar ceiling. The pre-assembled cross tees are connected to the main tees using a cam-lock device that quickly locks the cross tees into position with a half turn of a cone point set screw at each end of each cross tee. Main tees may be hung on 4′ centers or on 8′ centers. The ceiling is specifically designed for supporting AMHS below the ceiling grid.
The grid is compatible with the retrofit “Backbone” designed to increase the carrying capacity of the grid. The inverted “tee” flanges may be removable so filters/FFUs and blank pans may be installed from below without the need of jockeying them through the grid at an awkward angle prior to their being set onto the grid.
The main advantages of the present invention are the removable inverted tee flanges, the cam-lock connection, and the option of supporting the grid on 8′×8′ centers.
Having removable flanges permits ceiling installations in existing buildings having limited clearance in the interstitial space, installations having limited clearance can be nearly impossible with a conventional inverted tee grid ceiling. The removable flanges permit installation of the filters/FFUs and blank pans from below without the need of jockeying them through the grid at an awkward angle prior to their being set onto the grid. With the flanges removed the filters/FFUs and blank pans are simply raised into position in a level orientation. The removable flanges speed installation, reduce the possibility of damage to the filters/FFUs being installed and they permit safer installation of these heavy units.
The cam-lock connection is simply a faster connection than those used in existing ceiling systems. Comparable systems might use as many as twelve fasteners and a plate fitting to create the intersection connection. The pre-assembled cross tees of the present invention are connected to the main tees using a cam-lock device that quickly locks the cross tees into position with a half turn of a cone point set screw at each end of each cross tee. The cam-lock ceiling connection reduces the time to install the present invention to approximately ⅓ of the time it takes to install a comparable cleanroom ceiling.
Comparable systems to the present invention typically have an “intersection casting”. With aluminum castings at 4′×4′ centers, it is required that the entire ceiling be supported on 4′×4′ centers. This is very costly due to the amount of hardware and time to install. A major issue with the 4′×4′ hanger rod scheme is the instances of interference resulting from the vast amount of ductwork and piping typically located in the interstitial space. When a hanger rod is located directly below an existing duct it requires that a trapeze be formed to go around the duct up to the structure above. This adds to the congestion and cost due to additional hardware and time to install. The present invention has a unique connection between main tees that permits the present invention to be suspended at 8′×8′ centers. This reduces the congestion and the number of hanger rods by up to 75%.
In some embodiments, the main frame and cross frame members 101, 102 may be extruded aluminum. The main frame members 101 may attach using splice bars to increase the overall length in a singular direction or create a perpendicular intersection to form a grid. In other embodiments, the main frame and cross frame members 101, 102 may attach using cam-lock devices to create a perpendicular intersection to form a grid.
Optionally, a first main tee 101 may be extended with the use of a splice bar 214. One half of the splice bar 214 may slide over the stud (see
Additionally, a second main tee 201 may be attached to a first main tee 101 with a splice bar 202. The splice bar 202 may be inserted through a hole 224 bored into the web of the first main tee 101. The stud of the second main tee 201 may then be slid into one end of the splice bar 202 where the splice bar set screws 212c, 212d are tightened. Next, the stud of another main tee (not shown) may be slid into the available end of the splice bar 202 and the splice bar set screws 212a, 212b are tightened. In this way, the two secondary main tees 201 may be fastened to each other and the first main tee 101 through the use of a splice bar 202, thus forming an intersection of main tees 101, 201 without the use of an intersection piece as is known and used in the art.
In the present embodiment, removable flanges 210 are inserted into their respective receiving channels 322 in the recessed slot 328. A closure strip 316 may be inserted into the recessed slot 328 to push against the inside walls 324 of the removable flanges 210 to retain the removable flanges 210 in place. The closure strip 316 prevents the removable flanges 210 from moving transversely. The removable flanges 210 may support equipment and blank pans (not shown) placed on them. This is accomplished because the closure strip 316 presses laterally against the removable flanges 210 such that the closure strip 316 pushes the removable flanges 210 into the receiving slots 322, which is shaped to prevent transverse motion of the removable flanges 210.
In this embodiment, the grid stiffener 602 is secured to the top of the main tee 101 and may or may not run the entire length of the main tee 101. The grid stiffener 602 is comprised of a top receiving channel 628, two studs 634, and a base 636. The grid stiffener 602 may have one or more threaded bolts 608 with heads 610 accessible in the top receiving channel 628 and hammerhead-nuts 606 attached to each threaded bolt 608 extending below the bottom of the grid stiffener 602. The hammerhead-nuts 606 are inserted into the hammerhead-nut channel 220 of the main tee 101. The threaded bolts 608 may then be tightened to ensure that the grid stiffener 602 is securely fastened to the main tee 101. This configuration of grid stiffener 602 and main tee 101 significantly increases the load-bearing capacity and minimizes bowing or deflection of the main tee 101. The grid stiffeners 602 may be strategically positioned to provide stiffening support where necessary to provide the load-bearing capabilities needed. With an increased carrying capacity, the main tees 101 may then be hung on 8′×8′ centers instead of 4′×4′ centers. This reduces the number of hangers and allows personnel to move easier in the interstitial space. This also allows more convenient and faster installation and maintenance of equipment.
The present embodiment also shows an AMHS hanger 502 attached to the main tee 101. The AMHS hanger 502 may have a suspension attachment such as a threaded bolt 520 suspended from the body 532 as well as one or more threaded bolts 522 extending above connected to hammerhead-nuts 516. The hammerhead-nuts 516, which are screwed onto the threaded bolts 522, may then be inserted into the bottom hammerhead-nut slot 226 of the main tee 101. The head (not shown, see
The scope of this invention is not limited to the above-described preferred embodiment. The terms and expressions used are terms of description and there is no intention of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described, but it is recognized that various modifications, appreciable to one of ordinary skill, are possible within the scope of the invention claimed.
This application is related to and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/965,415 filed Aug. 20, 2007, for an Extruded Aluminum Bottom-Load Ceiling for Cleanrooms with Mechanism for Hanging Attachments, with inventor Peter J. Spransy which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
876985 | Malançon | Jan 1908 | A |
3261625 | Cripe | Jul 1966 | A |
3333387 | Deakins | Aug 1967 | A |
3451183 | Lespagnol et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
3559357 | Lowe | Feb 1971 | A |
3596425 | Kodaras | Aug 1971 | A |
3733759 | Schulte et al. | May 1973 | A |
3748793 | Tompkins et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3832816 | Jahn | Sep 1974 | A |
3837128 | O'Brien | Sep 1974 | A |
3884002 | Logie | May 1975 | A |
3989399 | Slowbe | Nov 1976 | A |
4047342 | Boulva | Sep 1977 | A |
4094113 | Good | Jun 1978 | A |
4128983 | Matsubara | Dec 1978 | A |
4299067 | Bertschi | Nov 1981 | A |
4545168 | Dalton, Jr. | Oct 1985 | A |
4944129 | Hartleif | Jul 1990 | A |
5077951 | Baker | Jan 1992 | A |
5154031 | Wall | Oct 1992 | A |
5363625 | Philippi | Nov 1994 | A |
5428930 | Bagley et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5444945 | Goodwin | Aug 1995 | A |
5482240 | Caraher | Jan 1996 | A |
5572844 | Stackenwalt et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5634312 | Tolliver et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5687527 | Bikard et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5794397 | Ludwig | Aug 1998 | A |
6123154 | MacDonald et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125606 | Larsson | Oct 2000 | A |
6158186 | Feller | Dec 2000 | A |
6511522 | Gomez et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6779315 | Bongio et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6789977 | Layfield | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6811130 | Oh | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7260919 | Spransy et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7287733 | Bongio et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20030213199 | Bongio et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20100130055 | Liang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60965415 | Aug 2007 | US |