The invention relates to strengthening and protecting components disposed within a flexible tubular. More specifically, this invention relates to use of an extruded polymer shape disposed about an internal core element disposed within the flexible tubular, e.g. an umbilical, to provide crush stiffness to the internal core element, for example use of an extruded polymer shape disposed about an armor wire used for tensile strengthening when disposed about the internal core element.
Polymeric fillers are a necessary part of the geometry of most flexible tubulars, such as umbilicals, and are used as packing, often as round, separate components disposed within the tubular. However, because most filler plastics used in the construction of umbilicals have a specific gravity of less than or equal to 1.0, it becomes costly and/or difficult to design umbilicals which meet specific weight requirements or weight-to-diameter ratios. Desired weight considerations can include suitability for dynamic and/or seabed stability, and will often result in having to add additional armor passes, which in turn increases the outer diameter (OD) of the umbilical. This adds additional cost and, more importantly, adds additional weight which in turn increases the tensile loading of the umbilical and often puts more strain on the internal core elements, resulting in larger crush forces during installation and recovery.
Current umbilical art also requires maintaining a high density in an umbilical, which may make it more stable while hanging from the platform or on the sea floor. Because many plastics comprise densities close to the density of water and because there is typically a lot of open space in an umbilical, manufactures are often forced to use a significant amount of armor, e.g. steel or other metal, on the umbilical to increase its density. However, as the amount of armor needed for density is increased, the total amount of armor also rises to be able to hold up the weight of the umbilical, resulting in a larger umbilical larger. When the umbilical is installed, this extra weight may present a significant load and the deploying mechanism, e.g. a vessel, has to apply a large crush tension (normal force) to keep the umbilical from slipping through the deploying device. This crush load may be high and damage interior core elements such as hoses, reducing the lifespan of the umbilical and its core components.
Accordingly, current art typically uses polymeric fillers as packing around internal components. These internal components may be stranded together in a helix and a layer of polymeric fillers such as polyethylene extruded over them; the components may then be stranded, often in an S-Z pattern over an internal core. An extruded sheath is then disposed over the bundled components with armor such as steel rods stranded over the outside, e.g. helically. Finally, another sheath is extruded over the armor. This design has shortcomings. For example, a high density in the umbilical is required, making it more stable while hanging from the platform or on the sea floor because the plastic used is very close to the density of water and there is a lot of open space in the umbilical. This, in turn, requires use of a lot of armor on the umbilical to increase its density but as the amount of armor increases for density an even greater amount of armor is required to be able to hold up the weight of the umbilical, making the umbilical larger. Another shortcoming is that an umbilical being installed is often gripped by a tensioner while up to 2500 m of umbilical are hanging off the end of the vessel. This is a significant load for the cable and the vessel has to apply a large crush tension (normal force) to keep the umbilical from slipping through the tensioner. This crush load can damage internal umbilical components such as hoses and reduces the lifespan of those components.
The figures supplied herein disclose various embodiments of the claimed invention.
In general, as will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the umbilical arts, “sheaths” are also sometimes referred to as outer extrusions or jackets and may comprise polyethylene, polyurethane or other suitable thermoplastic. A “core element” such as core element 32 in
Referring now to
Filler 31 typically comprises a polymer having a density of at least 1.0. The polymer typically comprises a high density polyethylene and may be selected or otherwise configured to provide impact and fatigue protection for one or more core elements 32, e.g. hose 32a (
Referring additionally to
Referring now to
Filler 310 typically comprises a polymer having a density of at least 1.0 such as, by way of example and not limitation, a high density polyethylene, and may be selected or otherwise configured to provide impact and fatigue protection for one or more core elements 32 (
Referring additionally to
Core assemblies 30 also typically comprise one or more shaped extruded polymers layer 33 configured to help give tubular 1 (
Referring now to
Tubular outer sheath 220 may further comprise outer surface 221 defining an outer circumference, inner sheath 223 comprising an inner surface defining an inner circumference in which outer sheath void 225 exists between outer surface 221 and inner sheath 223, and armor 222 disposed within outer sheath void 225.
Referring additionally to
Core assemblies 320 comprise one or more core elements 32 and polymer layer 333 which is extruded about core elements 32 in a separate, single pass process that does not bond polymer layer 333 to the core elements 32 of their respective core assembly 30. Polymer layer 333 defines a filler that typically comprises a polymer having a density of at least 1.0, typically a high density polyethylene, and may be selected or otherwise configured to provide impact and fatigue protection for one or more core elements 32. As with the other embodiments, core elements 32 may comprise a fluid hose, an electrical conductor, a fiber optic conductor, or the like, or a combination thereof.
In these embodiments, extruded polymer layer 333 is shaped to substantially and precisely fit about core elements 32 without leaving an exposed sharp edge. Typically, each polymer layer 333 is further shaped to interface with the remaining core assemblies 330 (
Referring now to
First filler 31a, comprising a first density of at least 1.0, is disposed within and substantially fills first region 11 and second filler 31b, comprising a second density with a density of at least 1.0 that is different than the first density, is disposed within and substantially fills second region 12. First filler 31a and second filler 31b are chosen or otherwise adapted to comprise a predetermined characteristic such as a characteristic sufficient to improve crush protection provided to the functional components core elements 32 (e.g.,
As with other embodiments, inner shell 60 (
As with other embodiments, armor such as armor 225 (
In all of these embodiments, tubular 1 is typically flexible and, by way of example and not limitation, be an umbilical such as an umbilical suitable for use subsea. In all of these embodiments, core elements 32 (e.g.
In the operation of preferred embodiments, referring generally to
In certain multi-region embodiments such as illustrated in
If armor is used, e.g. armor 22 (
The foregoing disclosure and description of the inventions are illustrative and explanatory. Various changes in the size, shape, and materials, as well as in the details of the illustrative construction and/or illustrative methods may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application 61/861,796 for “System and Method for Adjusting the WDR Ration of Umbilicals By Varying Density of Fillers,” filed Aug. 2, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4153332 | Longoni | May 1979 | A |
4196307 | Moore et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4222874 | Connelly | Sep 1980 | A |
4606604 | Soodak | Aug 1986 | A |
4676590 | Priaroggia | Jun 1987 | A |
4904321 | Harvey | Feb 1990 | A |
4979795 | Mascarenhas | Dec 1990 | A |
5630003 | Arroyo | May 1997 | A |
5892874 | Houghton | Apr 1999 | A |
6046404 | Figenschou et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6671441 | Bocanegra et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
8335417 | Register, III | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20050089285 | Bocanegra | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20080185138 | Hernandez-Solis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080190643 | Lumachi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080233318 | Coyle | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100044068 | Deighton | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100101676 | Quigley et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100186988 | Jeroense et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120241040 | Fogg | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130048373 | Fogg | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051740 | Fogg | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150036990 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61861796 | Aug 2013 | US |