This disclosure relates to precision fluid application systems.
Applicator systems are used in a wide variety of manufacturing operations to apply compositions such as glue. For example, glue application systems are used in bottle labeling, can labeling, corrugated box making, manufacturing disposable diapers, and manufacturing other products that involve the application of glue.
Hot melt glue is one type of glue that is particularly well suited for applications where it is desired to apply glue at a high rate of speed. Applicants' assignee, B & H Manufacturing Company, Inc., provides labeling machines with a glue application system in which a glue wheel is provided with hot melt glue that is applied to a knurled roller and scraped off with a doctor blade in a process that is comparable to a gravure printing process.
While this system generally provides a reliable system for applying glue to labels at a high rate of speed, issues remain that relate to precise control of glue quantity, consistency of glue properties and minimizing the volume of glue required to secure a label. In addition, if the system is not properly set-up and maintained, glue splatter may result in application of glue to the vacuum drum that supports labels and the surrounding area. The removal of glue splatter may require periodic cleaning with solvents and may result in machine downtime. Re-circulation of large volumes of hot melt glue from the glue wheel type applicator results in repeatedly reheating a substantial quantity of the glue which may adversely affect glue properties. In addition, exposure of the glue to air on a glue wheel may result in degradation of the adhesive properties of the glue.
One alternative approach is disclosed in US2008/0014344A1 that suggests spraying a container with hot melt glue to adhere a leading end of a label from a cut and stack label magazine or a roll fed labeler to the container. Hot melt glue was proposed to be wiped onto the trailing edge of the label by a slit die nozzle that directly contacts the label to apply glue to the trailing edge that is then attached to the container or the label. A problem with this approach is that glue is extruded from the nozzle and “waits” on the head until the glue is smeared onto the trailing edge of the label material. A lack of control over the quantity of glue laid down on the label, or lay down weight, results in variation in the glue lay down weight as labeling speeds increase. This system fails to provide a method of controlling the lay down weight at variable speeds and is believed to have been limited to systems that apply labels at a rate of no more than about 300 containers per minute. When the slit die nozzle for hot melt glue application directly contacts the label, particularly with thinner labels, the label may be wrinkled or otherwise distorted. Another problem with this proposed approach is that the spring that is used to contact the slot gun with the trailing edge pad does not compensate for increases in centrifugal forces as labeling speeds increase which results in an increase in the contact force that may damage the trailing edge pad. Another problem is that may arise from variation in lay down weight is that the label may become jammed in the machine or otherwise misapplied to the container.
In other approaches, glue is provided to the slit die nozzle at a pressure that is controlled with the objective of maintaining a constant pressure level. However, as a valve is opened and closed to apply the glue an uneven distribution of glue is applied to the label. Another strategy for applying glue is to control the volume of glue applied by changing the speed of the glue pump in an effort to maintain a constant pressure. One problem with this approach is that it may result in an intermittent pattern of pressure spikes and thickness variation in the adhesive deposits. Another problem with this approach is that the quantity of glue applied is subject to variation.
Continuous application of an adhesive to a web of a plastic substrate in the manufacture of adhesive tape or pressure sensitive label material may be performed with a slit die coating nozzle that is controlled by controlling the volumetric flow of adhesive to a web that is continuous and moving at a constant rate of speed. However, volumetric control does not yield consistent and reliable application of glue with a controlled thickness when the speed of application changes. The glue is a compressible non-Newtonian liquid which renders volumetric control unreliable because it does not compensate for internal friction, the Reynolds number for the passages, changing viscosity and changes in shear strength caused by the speed of flow of the glue.
Others have proposed various solutions to improve upon the performance of the glue wheel approach. It should be understood that all alternative prior art approaches are not attempted to be described above. Applicants' development addresses the above issues and other issues relating to applying hot melt glue or otherwise extruding a non-Newtonian fluid onto a substrate through a nozzle. Applicants' development may be adapted to a wide variety of applications that are not limited to container labeling applications or the application of hot melt glue.
Some aspects of the developments are summarized below in greater detail.
According to the present invention, an applicator is disclosed that is capable of accurately applying a consistent volume of a non-Newtonian liquid composition with consistent thickness to a substrate at a widely varying rate of speed of the extrusion. A non-Newtonian liquid composition is a liquid that does not flow in the same way as a Newtonian fluid, such as water. More particularly, the viscosity of non-Newtonian fluids is not independent of shear rate. As a result, viscosity is not constant which complicates controlling flow volumetrically. The disclosed application system variably controls pressure based upon the temperature, speed of extrusion and the flow characteristics of the composition. Pressure is modulated at a given temperature of the composition as a function of the speed of the extrusion to obtain desired target deposit thickness and consistent lay down weights.
Examples of non-Newtonian liquid compositions include liquid plastic compositions such as polymer solutions, or molten polymers like hot melt glue. A selected liquid plastic composition is applied under pressure onto a surface by way of a nozzle. The liquid plastic composition may be applied without touching the surface with the nozzle. The adhesive is extruded in a controlled volume and at a consistent thickness in at least one predefined region on the surface.
Another aspect of this development relates to the concept of controlling the pressure of the liquid plastic composition supplied to an extrusion nozzle. Pressure is controlled based upon empirical data relating the volume of a specified composition applied over time. A controlled volume of the composition is applied to a surface through a nozzle. The pressure of the composition within the nozzle is closely controlled based upon the rate at which the composition is dispensed from the nozzle.
Application of the adhesive to a label, or segmented substrate, is based upon controlling the sensed pressure of the adhesive in the applicator, and label segment position data. The sensed pressure in the applicator and the output of a positional encoder are inputs for a servo motor controller for a fluid pump. A valve controls the timing of the deposit of adhesive onto the surface. Data from a look up table, or data matrix, may be provided to the processor to vary the quantity of adhesive based upon known or estimated values for the rate of application and pressure in the applicator. According to the method, a consistent volume of adhesive is applied to the label, or segmented substrate, surface in precise locations with consistent thickness.
The pressure of the liquid plastic composition may be modulated at the inlet of the slit die nozzle. The system may be adjusted by referencing a data table for a particular liquid plastic composition having certain flow properties. A self-adjusting system may be provided for applying a deposit of liquid plastic composition with a uniform thickness to a surface. According to the method, changes in the speed of intermittent extrusion do not cause variation in the thickness of the deposits.
The slit die nozzle in the disclosed system may be oriented with the slit of the nozzle being elongated in the vertical, horizontal or in any other orientation.
Another aspect of the disclosure is related to providing a labeling machine that has a rigid all metal vacuum drum that has rigid metal pads at selected locations on a vertically oriented surface of the vacuum drum. The rigid metal pads are radially adjustable to provide precise spacing relative to a vertically oriented slit nozzle adhesive applicator.
Another aspect of the disclosure is to provide a roll fed labeler that is capable of reliably applying a hot melt adhesive having a viscosity of more than 1,300 centipoises per second (cps). Hot melt adhesives having a viscosity of more than 10,000 centipoises have been successfully applied that offer favorable adhesive properties but were previously not considered to be usable in high speed labeling operations. The applicator facilitates the use of more economical glues that may have improved adhesion and strength properties.
Other aspects of applicants' development as disclosed herein will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art of labeling containers or manufacturing products that require precise application of adhesives. More generally, the applicants' developments may permit more effective and efficient application of a liquid plastic composition by providing a controlled volume of the composition having the desired strength characteristics for a specific application.
One aspect of this invention is to provide a machine that applies a non-Newtonian liquid composition in a controlled pattern of deposits to a surface. The composition may be hot melt glue or may be another type of liquid plastic composition that must be carefully applied in a predetermined pattern or in a full coating to a surface. The machine in the illustrated embodiment is a labeling machine but the technology may also be used in other machines that apply a non-Newtonian liquid composition to a surface.
In one example of a machine for applying a non-Newtonian liquid composition, hot melt glue may be applied to a label segment. The composition is received through an inlet and is dispensed through an outlet of a nozzle that deposits a controlled layer of the composition on the surface as the surface moves relative to the nozzle. A valve has an inlet that receives the composition from a pressurized source and is provided to control dispensing the composition through the nozzle outlet. A pressure transducer measures the pressure of the composition at the valve inlet and generates a signal representative of the pressure. A temperature sensor measures the temperature of the composition and provides a temperature signal. The machine has a logic circuit that controls the operation of the valve and an output that controls the pressure. The logic circuit uses inputs such as the signal representative of pressure, temperature of the composition, the location of the surface, the speed that the surface is moving relative to the nozzle to apply the composition in a controlled manner, and a fluid flow profile that provides for a given temperature and number of surfaces receiving a layer or the containers per minute determines the output that controls the pressure.
In another example of the machine for applying a composition, the machine, as described above, utilizes inputs that relate to the characteristics of the composition that include correlation data that correlates the speed of movement of the surface with the pressure of the composition.
Another aspect of the machine for applying a liquid plastic composition to a surface, the chamber may have a return conduit that provides a return flow path from the chamber to a reservoir. The return conduit may have a fixed metering orifice that partially restricts the flow of the composition through the return conduit. The metering orifice facilitates control of the pressure of the liquid plastic composition. A limited volume of adhesive is returned to the adhesive reservoir through the orifice, which is located downstream of the nozzle.
The invention may also be characterized as a method of dispensing a liquid plastic composition onto a surface. The method includes the steps of selecting the composition to be dispensed through a nozzle while the surface moves relative to the nozzle. The speed of the surface is determined, correlation data is referenced and variable pressure levels are used to control the rate of displacement of the composition from the chamber. The pressure applied to the composition is measured and compared to the variable pressure value level to adjust the rate of displacement of a supply pump for the composition. A deposit of the composition is intermittently released from the nozzle by a valve that is timed based in part upon the speed with which the surface moves relative to the nozzle, a data matrix of the fluid flow characteristics including the rate of fluid flow within a range of temperatures and a range of pressure levels.
The method of the present invention may also include empirically testing the composition to develop a pressure look-up table that includes correlation data for a plurality of speeds and a plurality of pressure set-points. Alternatively, correlation data may be provided from a pressure look up table that is generated by an algorithm. The algorithm for controlling pressure may use a direct feedback system that measures the actual thickness of the deposits. The direct feedback system may incorporate a laser measurement apparatus.
These and other features, objects and aspects of the invention will be better understood in view of the attached drawings and the following detailed description of the illustrated embodiments of the invention provided below.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed below with reference to the drawings. However, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale and some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
Referring to
In the illustrated labeling machine 10, a web of label material 12 is provided in the form of a roll 16 to labeling machine 10. A stream of containers 18 is provided to the labeling machine 10 on an in-feed conveyor 20. The containers 18 are fed to a star wheel 22 that picks up the containers 18 and spaces the containers 18 from each other for labeling. An idler wheel 26 cooperates with the star wheel 22 to ensure proper positioning of the containers 18 in the star wheel 22 as the containers 18 are moved by the star wheel 22 toward the vacuum drum 28. A liquid plastic composition, for example, hot melt glue or another adhesive is applied to the label 30.
The star wheel 22 feeds the containers 18 to a location adjacent to a vacuum drum 28. The vacuum drum 28 holds one or more discrete labels 30 after they are cut off from the web of label material 12 by a cutter assembly 32. The vacuum drum 28 holds the labels 30 in position as the labels are transferred by the vacuum drum 28 past a hot melt glue applicator 34. Turning now to
Returning to
Referring to
Glue is provided to the slit die nozzle 44 through a glue chamber 46 defined within the glue applicator 34. Alternatively, the chamber 46 could be eliminated and the glue could be supplied to a valve, such as a solenoid valve 50. A pressure transducer 48 is provided to measure the pressure of the glue in the glue chamber 46 or upstream from the valve 50. The glue chamber 46 may be in the nature of a rigid manifold. The pressure transducer 48 is a high temperature pressure transducer that is capable of measuring the pressure within the glue chamber 46 or upstream from the valve 50. The glue applicator 34 includes a plurality of solenoid valves 50 that function as on/off control gates for the hot melt glue. The solenoids 50 are controlled by a programmable logic controller (PLC) 66 that receives position data from the encoder 74 and pressure inputs from the pressure transducer 48. The encoder may be, for example, a linear or rotary encoder which allows a processor to determine the position of a label as the label is moved relative to the nozzle 44 of a glue applicator 34. The label is preferably maintained in a spaced relationship relative to the nozzle 44. Control of the glue application operation will be described more specifically below.
Referring to
Referring to
Pressure is maintained within the glue chamber 46, in part, by providing a fixed metering outlet orifice 96 (see, for example,
Referring to
Referring now to
Returning now to
The pressure within the glue chamber 46 is tightly controlled by way of a feedback controller 92 established in the PLC or other computing device. Feedback controller 92 operates within the PLC 66 or other computing device, and runs a control loop in which the pressure set point 94 is determined by matching an RPM calculation 90 with the corresponding pressure listed in RPM versus pressure tables 86. The RPM calculation 90 relies on the rotary position data from the rotary encoder 74, and is therefore dependent upon the operating speed of the labeling machine (in containers per minute). The RPM value with a rotary cutter assembly 32 that cuts one label per rotation is the same as a value of the number of substrates to which the glue is applied per minute. The particular RPM versus pressure table from which the pressure set point 94 is selected is generally unique to the selected glue recipe 80. The RPM versus pressure tables 86 are typically generated prior to the operational use of the labeling machine by way of an empirical data acquisition process 72, and generally uploaded into the HMI 68.
The pressure transducer 48 reads the pressure in the glue chamber 46. In systems that do not have a chamber, the pressure transducer 48 would read the pressure at the inlet of the valves 50. The feedback controller 92 compares the pressure set point 94 to the pressure measured by the pressure transducer 48. If the measured pressure is below the pressure set point 94, the feedback controller 92 will send commands to the servo amplifier 38 to increase the speed of the servo motor 76 in the hot melt unit 70. Increasing the speed of the servo motor 76 increases the speed of the glue pump 36 and, consequentially, increases glue pressure downstream in the glue chamber 46. Conversely, if the measured pressure is above the pressure set point 94, the feedback controller 92 will send commands to the servo amplifier 38 to decrease the speed of the servo motor 76. Decreasing the speed of the servo motor 76 reduces the speed of the glue pump 36 and, consequentially, decreases the glue pressure downstream in the glue chamber 46.
Turning now to
If the applied glue is determined to be below desired thickness, the pressure in the glue chamber 46 is increased, and the process returns to the extrusion of another test deposit of glue onto a label. If the applied glue is determined to be above desired thickness, the pressure in the glue chamber is decreased, and the process also returns to the extrusion of another test deposit of glue onto a label.
An algorithm may be used with a CCD laser measurement apparatus to either dynamically set the pressure in the chamber or develop a table of pressure values based upon available inputs. The laser measurement apparatus may measure the thickness of the deposit layer that is then used in a direct feedback system.
If the applied glue is neither below nor above the desire glue thickness, a determination is then made as to whether the longitudinal position of the glue deposit (for example, along longitudinal direction 108 in
Once glue deposit positional deviation is no longer occurring as a result of line speed change, the RPM (derived from rotary encoder 74 data) versus the glue chamber 46 pressure is recorded. If a single label segment is cut per RPM, there is a direct relationship of the number of cutter RPM to the number of substrates that are provided with glue per minute. If maximum desired line speed has not been reached, the line speed is increased by one increment, and the process returns to the extrusion of a test deposit of glue onto a label. If maximum line speed has been reached, the empirical data acquisition process 72 is generally terminated with respect to the selected glue recipe. The records of RPM versus pressure are then generally arranged in look-up tables corresponding to each glue recipe tested, and input into the HMI 68 (see
In further embodiments, the empirical data acquisition process 72 for each glue recipe is attempted at lower glue temperatures. Applicants have determined that applying glue to labels at lower temperatures preserves the adhesive properties of the glue by, for example, minimizing temperature-related breakdown of the adhesive chemistry. Since lowering the glue temperature at the slit die nozzle 44 is likely to affect the flow properties of the glue, lowering the glue nozzle temperature also tend to change the results of the empirical data acquisition process 72 for a given glue recipe. As a result, the RPM versus pressure tables 86 for each glue recipe may depend on the operating temperature of the slit die nozzle 44.
Applicants have found that the plotting of the RPM versus pressure data for a given glue recipe at a constant temperature and gap distance commonly results in a curved graph similar to that shown in
As illustrated in
While exemplary embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of the various illustrated embodiments and other described variations may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional Application No. 61/319,960, filed Apr. 1, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3235433 | Cvacho et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
4056075 | Seiderman | Nov 1977 | A |
4156398 | McDaniel | May 1979 | A |
4277301 | McIntyre et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4371571 | McIntyre et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4530862 | Kerzel | Jul 1985 | A |
4535919 | Jameson | Aug 1985 | A |
4622239 | Schoenthaler et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4682710 | Turner, Jr. et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4787332 | Geisel et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4830218 | Shirkhan | May 1989 | A |
4842162 | Merkel | Jun 1989 | A |
4848657 | Hashimoto et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850514 | Scholl et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4883691 | McIntyre | Nov 1989 | A |
4922852 | Price | May 1990 | A |
4935261 | Srivastava et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4988015 | Price | Jan 1991 | A |
4995333 | Keller et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5016665 | Konieczynski | May 1991 | A |
5049368 | Turner | Sep 1991 | A |
5061170 | Allen et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5065695 | Baron et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5207352 | Porter et al. | May 1993 | A |
5228594 | Aslin | Jul 1993 | A |
5236641 | Allen et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5263608 | Kiernan et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271521 | Noss et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5307288 | Haines | Apr 1994 | A |
5316836 | Heindel et al. | May 1994 | A |
5332125 | Schmitkons et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5342647 | Heindel et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5401353 | Westbury et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5413651 | Otruba | May 1995 | A |
5418009 | Raterman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419930 | Schucker | May 1995 | A |
5423935 | Benecke et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5443678 | Chevalier et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456870 | Bulgrin | Oct 1995 | A |
5462199 | Lenhardt | Oct 1995 | A |
5481260 | Buckler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5495963 | Miller et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520958 | Doesburg et al. | May 1996 | A |
5605720 | Allen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5645639 | Doesburg et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5683036 | Benecke et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5685911 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5733379 | Schmitkons et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5808559 | Buckler | Sep 1998 | A |
5857589 | Cline et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867102 | Souder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881914 | Tsuda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5906682 | Bouras et al. | May 1999 | A |
5958178 | Bartsch et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5984148 | Andel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992686 | Cline et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995909 | Bretmersky et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999106 | Buckler | Dec 1999 | A |
6023666 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6089413 | Riney et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6139903 | Baron et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143075 | Osbon | Nov 2000 | A |
6161723 | Cline et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173864 | Reighard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220843 | Allen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6286566 | Cline et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6328832 | Otruba et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329013 | Putt | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6422428 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432084 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450230 | Otruba | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6499987 | Durina et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517891 | Estelle et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6541063 | Prentice et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6541304 | Bouras et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6637471 | Luehrsen et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6675988 | Cline et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6712906 | Estelle et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752323 | Roos et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6892959 | Fugere | May 2005 | B1 |
6913166 | Cline et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6932870 | Gunn et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942736 | Chinander et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955946 | Bouras et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6991000 | Jeter et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991825 | Hui et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7101439 | Kushihashi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112246 | Schucker | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7122092 | Poole et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7198073 | Luehrsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204960 | Hui et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208721 | Valentin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7293720 | Ramsay | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7341089 | Puffe et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360564 | Engels et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7465264 | Bomba | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7527493 | Durina | May 2009 | B1 |
7634367 | Ding et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7770760 | McGuffey et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771556 | Fort et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789111 | Luehrsen et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7874456 | Bolyard, Jr. et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7963954 | Kavazov | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967168 | Geier et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8011394 | Luehrsen et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8181468 | Fiske et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192573 | Leykamm | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226597 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231566 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255088 | Burkus, II et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20030157251 | Mandai et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040159402 | Poole et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161531 | Ferber et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186621 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050048196 | Yanagita et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060175432 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060289566 | Heerdt et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070017638 | Moebius | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029036 | Fort et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070235120 | Poole et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080014344 | Fort et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100147454 | Leykamm | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100260531 | Rademacher | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120031326 | Wu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040477 | Yu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0403280 | Dec 1990 | EP |
1459808 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2005144358 | Jun 2005 | JP |
3731912 | Jan 2006 | JP |
WO2005115847 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007005396 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2008078044 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2009071237 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Nordson, Wraparound Labeling System, Carousel Magazine-fed Applications, Jan. 2006, pp. 1-2. |
Nordson, PatternCoat Slot Gun, Adjustable-width slot gun delivers production efficiency in magazine-fed labeling applications with frequent label format changes, Sep. 2007, pp. 1-2. |
Marathon Overview, 5 Servo Axes on XL/XLA (4 Servo Axes on SL/SLA), 2004. |
Webflight, Webflight Micro-Control Coating Technology, 2006. |
Robatech Gluing Technology, Hotmelt Applicator Heads SX/AX Bead and Dot Applications, 2008. |
Robatech Gluing Technology, Nozzle Application System, Wrap-Around Labeling, 2008. |
International Searching Authority, The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for the corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/030462 mailed Jun. 30, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110244115 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61319960 | Apr 2010 | US |