Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to data storage systems, and more particularly, to a memory device utilizing Network-on-Chip architecture for the interconnection of memory banks.
The heart of a computer is a magnetic recording device which typically may include a rotating magnetic media or a solid state media device. A number of different memory technologies exist today for storing information for use in a computing system.
In recent years there has been a demand for higher density devices, which maintain a relatively low cost per bit, for use in high capacity storage applications. Today the memory technologies that generally dominate the computing industry are DRAM and NAND flash; however these memory technologies may not be able to address the current and future capacity demands of next generation computing systems.
Existing non-volatile memory bank architecture employs a classic fabric routing methodology which has been widely adopted in SRAM, DRAM, FLASH, MRAM, PCM, and ReRAM, as well as with HMC memory banks. This classic methodology limits the amount of memory cells that may be included in a single die as well as the amount of bandwidth and access points to the same memory bank.
Traditionally, memory banks are architectured and organized as banks comprising arrays of subbanks. Each subbank may comprise multiple MATs. Each MAT may be composed of four or more subarrays and predecoding logic. As such, H-Tree routing may be used to route the I/O of the subarrays across the die vertically and horizontally. However, approximately 70% of the area is utilized to interconnect the subarrays; therefore the majority of the surface of the memory is logic interconnection and not memory. As such, the biggest limitation with existing memory bank architecture is the amount of wire necessary to route the entire memory. Excessive amount of wire is the main cause for latency in existing memory banks from SRAM to DRAM. Given the physical limitations of traditional memory banks, subarrays share wordlines to write and read. As such, each bank can only access one subarray at a given time. With such limitations, there may only be one physical access interface, due to complexity and cost, to implement additional interfaces.
Therefore, there is a need in art for an improved memory device which utilizes an improved architecture and allows for access to any given subarray in parallel. Furthermore, there is a need in the art for an improved methodology for routing memory banks without employing a majority of the die for routing.
Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to the use of Network-on-Chip architecture for solid state memory structures which provide for the access of memory storage blocks via a router. As such, data may be sent to and/or from the memory storage blocks as data packets on the chip. The Network-on-Chip architecture may further be utilized to interconnect unlimited numbers of memory cell matrices, spread on a die, thus allowing for reduced latencies among matrices, selective power control, unlimited memory density growth without major latency penalties, and reduced parasitic capacitance and resistance. Other benefits may include improved signal integrity, larger die areas available to implement memory arrays, and higher frequency of operation.
In one embodiment, a memory device is disclosed. The memory device may include a plurality of nodes. Each node may include a router, a plurality of links interconnecting each router with each plurality of nodes using Network-on-Chip architecture, and at least one memory array. The router may include a plurality of FIFOs, data packet switching logic, and at least one aggregator. Each FIFO may allow for the individual breaking of clock domains across multiple channels. The aggregator may be operatively connected with the data packet switching logic. The at least one memory array may be operatively connected with each router via a link. Each memory array may be accessed via the router.
In another embodiment, a memory device is disclosed. The memory device may include at least one interconnected memory cell matrix. The interconnected memory cell matrix may include a plurality of routers, a plurality of intellectual property cores, and at least one link. Each router may include a plurality of FIFOs. One intellectual property core may be coupled to each router. The at least one link may couple adjacent routers of the plurality of routers utilizing a Network-on-Chip architecture scheme.
In yet another embodiment, a memory device is disclosed. The memory device may include at least one interconnected memory cell matrix. The interconnected memory cell matrix may include a plurality of routers and a plurality of intellectual property cores. Each router may include a plurality of FIFOs, data packet switching logic, and at least one aggregator. The aggregator may be operatively connected to at least one FIFO and the data packet switching logic. One intellectual property core may be coupled to each router via a link utilizing a Network-on-Chip architecture scheme.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the one or more aspects comprise the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative features of the one or more aspects. These features are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of various aspects may be employed, and this description is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the disclosure may admit to other equally effective embodiments in any field.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements disclosed in one embodiment may be beneficially utilized on other embodiments without specific recitation.
In the following disclosure, reference is made to embodiments. However, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited to specific described embodiments. Instead, any combination of the following features and elements, whether related to different embodiments or not, is contemplated to implement and practice the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, although embodiments described herein may achieve advantages over other possible solutions and/or over the prior art, whether or not a particular advantage is achieved by a given embodiment is not limiting of the claimed subject matter. Thus, the following aspects, features, embodiments and advantages are merely illustrative and are not considered elements or limitations of the appended claims except where explicitly recited in a claim(s).
Embodiments disclosed herein generally relate to the use of Network-on-Chip architecture for solid state memory structures which provide for the access of memory storage blocks via a router. As such, data may be sent to and/or from the memory storage blocks as data packets on the chip. The Network-on-Chip architecture may further be utilized to interconnect unlimited numbers of memory cell matrices, spread on a die, thus allowing for reduced latencies among matrices, selective power control, unlimited memory density growth without major latency penalties, and reduced parasitic capacitance and resistance. Other benefits may include improved signal integrity, larger die areas available to implement memory arrays, and higher frequency of operation.
In the following description of aspects of the present disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration of the specific implementations in which the disclosure may be practiced. It should be noted that the figures discussed herein are not drawn to scale and do not indicate actual or relative sizes. Any hatching in the figures is used to distinguish layers and does not represent the type of material used.
A drawback of existing memory bank architecture, such as the architecture of the first memory bank 102 and the second memory bank 104 of
Each subarray 124 may be connected within the conventional memory bank architecture scheme 120 via wire 126. A conventional memory bank architecture scheme 120 utilizing a line size of eight words of 64 bits maintains a total of 512 bits, or metal tracks. As such, collectively, each conventional memory bank architecture scheme 120 may utilize over 8,000 wires 126 to interconnect each subarray 124 therewithin. The utilization of H-Tree routing layout 122 necessitates that power is constantly applied to the entire H-Tree.
The conventional memory bank 102, 104 of
In certain embodiments, a mesh topology for Network-on-Chip architecture 202 may support silicon implementation of the inherent 2-D structure of the topology which maps well to planar semiconducting processes. A traditional 2-D mesh topology may assume a regular and/or symmetric layout with uniformly sized nodes 204. It is contemplated, however, that nodes 204 and/or contents of the nodes 204 may vary widely in shape and/or in dimension.
To accommodate memory arrays 208 attached to a Network-on-Chip each router 206 may have a range of addresses, rather than a single address. As such, in some embodiments, each router 206 may have a unique address rather than X and/or Y coordinates. In certain embodiments, the unique address for each router 206 may be a range of addresses. The range of addresses for each router 206 may be a sequential range of addresses. Additionally, each memory array 208 may have a unique address and/or a unique range of addresses rather than X and/or Y coordinates. The range of addresses for each memory array 208 may be a sequential range of addresses, as each memory array 208 is a linear sequence of memory addresses.
As such, a data packet (not shown) may be sent to an address. Each router 206 may have a range of addresses which are defined by the amount of memory available in the node 204. As such, each node 204 may be, by way of example only, 1024 lines or 2048 lines, independently, in the same design. Therefore, the data packet switching logic 222 (See
Routers 206 may be located at grid points where data packets or message packets may change directions on an X-Y plane and/or exit to host blocks on the Network-on-Chip. As such, routers 206 may be utilized when data packets need to switch from one node 204 to another node 204 on the path of the data packet. A router 206 may be utilized at points where data packets from multiple input links may meet and contend for a common output link.
As further shown in
The memory device 200 may further include a first router mesh structure 212. The first router mesh structure 212 may include a plurality of routers 206, such as at least two routers 206, and a plurality of memory arrays 208, such as at least two memory arrays 208. Each memory array 208 may be operatively connected to at least one router 206 via a link 210. The first router mesh structure 212 may further include a plurality of nodes 204 having a layout disposed at a first layer. In certain embodiments, an interior portion of the first router mesh may include a standard tile that is tessellated in X and Y directions to form a plurality of N×N meshes. It is contemplated, however, that any tessellation or topology may be utilized to interconnect the nodes 204 in the mesh structure 212 and/or in the Network-on-Chip architecture 202.
As shown in
Each node 204 of the plurality of nodes may be operated on a different frequency. Furthermore, in some embodiments, each node 204 of the plurality of nodes may be operated with a separate voltage. The separate voltage may be selected and/or generated on the fly.
The use of a FIFO 220 may allow for the breaking of clock domains one-by-one completely independently across various channels. As such, a full duplex channel may operate in different bandwidths and/or operating frequencies. Furthermore, each channel may operate in different and independent frequencies. The use of a FIFO 220 may allow for an EDA tool to route a Clock Tree Synthesis with improved performance and/or improved signal to noise ratio. Additionally, each FIFO 220 may be implemented with non-volatile and/or volatile technology, for example, SRAM and/or MRAM.
As further shown in
Data packets (not shown) may be fragmented, such that data may be sent to and from the memory array 208 via the router 206 and/or the plurality of links 210 as a fragmented data packet. For example, 64 bits may be broken into four packets of 16 bits or eight packets of eight bits. The same path need not be followed to send each data packet to its destination. As such, four clock cycles plus hops are needed to transit the data packet across the network to read or write the memory in any position. Furthermore, the amount of wires, as shown with reference to
Additionally, operating at higher frequencies may also allow for the linear prediction of the total latency of any communication in a given system in a specific process node 204, prior to fabrication. Furthermore, the final power consumption of a memory device may be accurately predicted. Also, specific routers 206 may be activated sequentially across the path of a data packet as it travels across the network, without having to power the entire network.
Benefits of the present disclosure include reduced latencies among matrices, selective power control as the power source of unused clusters may be completely shut down while those power sources of clusters in use may receive power. Additional benefits include that the memory density may be indefinitely grown without latency penalties, limited by physical factors of the fabrication process and the die size. Further benefits include reduced parasitic capacitance and resistance, improved signal integrity, more die area available to implement memory arrays thus allowing for higher memory density, and higher frequency of operation. Also, multiple channels may be had in each direction thus adding to the concept of priority communication into the memory device. Additionally, each FIFO may be utilized with volatile and/or non-volatile technologies, such as, by way of example only, SRAM and/or MRAM.
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the disclosure, other and further embodiments may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/922,547 filed Oct. 26, 2015, entitled, “FABRIC INTERCONNECTION FOR MEMORY BANKS BASED ON NETWORK-ON-CHIP METHODOLOGY,” published as US2017/0118139 on Apr. 27, 2017 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,165,717 on Nov. 2, 2021 by Bandic et al., incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6968394 | El-Rafie | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7772880 | Solomon | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7978693 | Dielissen | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8386690 | Li et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8391281 | Paul | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8442057 | Howe | May 2013 | B2 |
8443144 | Yim et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8719753 | Chow et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8819616 | Philip et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9443561 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9652425 | Chen et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9658676 | Witek et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9699079 | Chopra | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20020184419 | Creedon | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030075797 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040100832 | Nakajima | May 2004 | A1 |
20080005402 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080084893 | Lee | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090210616 | Karamcheti et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100061470 | Wei et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110235531 | Vangal | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110320719 | Mejdrich | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120159496 | Dighe et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130028090 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031330 | Jones | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130083794 | Lakshmanamurthy | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130188536 | Pirskanen | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130285739 | Blaquiere | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140156929 | Falsafi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140204735 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140310467 | Shalf et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140328208 | Norige et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140376569 | Philip | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150016172 | Loh et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150109024 | Abdelfattah et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150178435 | Kumar | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150220470 | Chen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160182396 | Kaul et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160284046 | Koker et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160344629 | Gray | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170118111 | Bandic et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170118139 | Bandic et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170272381 | Li | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102823214 | Dec 2012 | CN |
2015035117 | Feb 2015 | JP |
101028806 | Apr 2011 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Bandic, et al., Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/924,670. |
Bandic, et al., Office Action dated May 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/924,670. |
Srinivasan, et al., A Memory Subsystem Model for Evaluating Network-on-Chip Performance, https:/www.designreuse.com/articles/25029/memory-subsystem-model-noc-performance.html, accessed on May 31, 2018. |
Bandic, et al., Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 2, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/924,670. |
Office Action received for CN Patent Application No. 201610970031.9, dated Jun. 8, 2020, 30 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2017, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Response to Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Final Office Action dated May 16, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Response to Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2018, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Response to Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2019, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Response to Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Response to Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2020, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 8, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Amendment under 37 CFR 1.312 dated Aug. 12, 2021, U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,547, filed Oct. 26, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220014480 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14922547 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 17486528 | US |