This disclosure relates to a process for fabricating an integrated loudspeaker diaphragm and suspension, and the resulting product.
Prior art use of MEMS techniques to create electroacoustic transducers (loudspeakers or microphones) generally attempt to form the entire transducer in the MEMS package—that is, both the diaphragm that radiates or is moved by sound and the voice-coil or other electro-mechanical transducer that moves or senses movement of the diaphragm are formed in or on a single silicon or other semiconductor substrate. See, for example, U.S. Patent Application 2013/0156253. Conventional loudspeakers, on the other hand, have numerous discrete parts, including, in a typical example, a diaphragm or other sound-radiating surface, a suspension, a housing, and a voice coil.
In general, in one aspect, forming an electroacoustic transducer having a diaphragm and suspension includes depositing a layer of compliant material on a first surface of a solid substrate and removing material from a second surface of the solid substrate. The removal leaves a block of substrate material suspended within an inner perimeter of an outer support ring of the substrate material by the compliant material, the block providing the diaphragm.
Implementations may include one or more of the following, in any combination. The compliant material may have an elastic strain limit of at least 50 percent. The compliant material may be cured. The compliant material may have an elastic strain limit of at least 150 percent. The compliant material may include liquid silicone rubber (LSR). The step of removing material from the substrate may include removing material from a portion of the substrate in some areas to form the block, and removing all material of the substrate in other areas to form a gap between the inner perimeter of the outer support ring and the suspended block. The step of removing material from the substrate may include deep reactive ion etching (DRIE), material being removed from a portion of the substrate by a single DRIE etch, and material being removed from the entire substrate by multiple DRIE etches. The substrate may include a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer, and the step of depositing the layer of compliant material may be performed after the step of removing material from a portion of the substrate to form the block, but before the step of removing all material from other areas to form the gap. The step of removing material from the substrate may include deep reactive ion etching (DRIE), material being removed from a portion of the substrate by a single DRIE etch, and material being removed from the entire substrate by multiple DRIE etches through the main Si wafer, an etch of the insulator layer, and an etch of the top Si layer. The substrate may include a silicon wafer, and the step of depositing the layer of compliant material may be performed before the steps of removing material from the substrate.
Removing material from the substrate may leave the block having a side wall retaining most of the thickness of the substrate around an outer perimeter of the block facing the inner perimeter of the outer support ring, and a thinner portion of the substrate remaining bounded by the side wall leaving a void in the interior of the block. A bobbin may be attached to the block, the bobbin being located adjacent to an inter perimeter of the side wall. The bobbin may be attached to the block by adhesive, the adhesive being contained by the side wall such that it may not contact the suspension. The side wall of the block may act as an alignment guide for the attachment of the bobbin.
Removing material from the substrate may leave the outer support ring having a wall retaining most of the thickness of the substrate and forming the inner perimeter of the outer support ring, and a thinner portion of the substrate at the top of the wall forming a lip around an outer perimeter of the outer support ring. A ferromagnetic housing may be attached to the outer support ring, the housing being located adjacent to an outer perimeter of the outer support ring wall and the lip. The housing may be attached to the outer support ring by adhesive, the adhesive being prevented by the side wall from contacting the suspension between the block and the outer support ring. The outer support ring may act as an alignment guide for the attachment of the housing. The compliant material may be cut through at the location of an outer perimeter of the outer support ring, separating the block, the outer support ring, and the compliant layer suspending the block within the outer support ring from the substrate. An inner perimeter of the silicon substrate surrounding the outer support ring may align a cutting tool for cutting through the compliant material. The step of cutting may be performed after the step of attaching the ferromagnetic housing to the outer support ring. The ferromagnetic housing may align a cutting tool for cutting through the compliant material.
The step of removing material may form a plurality of diaphragms and corresponding outer support rings over the area of the substrate. A plurality of bobbins may be attached to the diaphragms and a plurality of housings may be attached to the outer support rings, simultaneously, while the diaphragm and outer support rings remain attached to the substrate and each other by the layer of compliant material. The compliant material may be cut through at the locations of the plurality of outer support rings, the plurality of housings serving as alignment guides for a cutting tool.
In general, in one aspect, a diaphragm and suspension assembly for an electroacoustic transducer includes a piston made of a disk of silicon having a flat surface and serving as the diaphragm, and a support ring of silicon surrounding the piston and separated from the piston by a gap. A layer of compliant material adhered to a top surface of the support ring and to the flat surface of the piston suspends the piston in the gap.
Implementations may include one or more of the following, in any combination. The piston may include a void within the disk of silicon, bounded by a perimeter wall of the disk and the top surface of the disk. The support ring may include an inner perimeter wall of silicon facing the gap, and an outer lip having less height than the inner perimeter wall. The compliant material may have an elastic strain limit of at least 50 percent. The compliant material may have an elastic strain limit of at least 150 percent. The compliant material may have a Young's modulus and a thickness that together result in the compliant material surrounding the piston in the gap having a mechanical stiffness in the range of 5-100 N/m. The compliant material includes liquid silicone rubber (LSR). The support ring may have an outer diameter of around 4 mm. The piston may have a thickness between 10 and 100 μm. The piston may have a thickness of about 50 μm. The layer of compliant material may be between 10 and 500 μm thick. The layer of compliant material may be around 50 μm thick.
In general, in one aspect, an electro-acoustic transducer includes a piston made of a disk of silicon having a flat surface and serving as a diaphragm of the transducer, a support ring of silicon surrounding the piston and separated from the piston by a gap, a layer of compliant material adhered to a top surface of the support ring and to the flat surface of the piston, suspending the piston in the gap, a bobbin coupled to the piston, a ferromagnetic housing coupled to the support ring, and a magnet/voice-coil system coupled to the housing and bobbin for converting electrical current to motion of the piston.
Implementations may include one or more of the following, in any combination. The piston disk may include a perimeter wall and the top surface bounding a void within the disk, and the bobbin may be adjacent to an inner perimeter of the perimeter wall of the disk. The support ring may include an inner perimeter wall of silicon facing the gap, and an outer lip having less height than the inner perimeter wall, and the ferromagnetic housing may be adjacent to an outer perimeter surface of the inner perimeter wall and a bottom surface of the outer lip.
In general, in one aspect, forming a diaphragm and suspension for an electroacoustic transducer from a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer having a top layer of Si, an intermediate layer of SiO2, an inner layer of Si, and a bottom layer of SiO2, includes:
In general, in one aspect, forming a piston and suspension for an electroacoustic transducer, includes
Advantages include simplifying subsequent assembly steps by integrating the suspension, diaphragm, and part of the housing into a single part with the suspended element integrally connected to the suspension and non-suspended element. Additional advantages include enhanced mechanical tolerances not possible with traditional macrofabrication techniques for some components while retaining high motor constant and efficiency of the traditionally fabricated motor structure.
All examples and features mentioned above can be combined in any technically possible way. Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and the claims.
As shown in
One potential material for the compliant suspension is liquid silicone rubber (LSR), a product based on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). To properly suspend the piston, while allowing it to move as needed at acoustic frequencies, the material of the suspension should have an elastic strain limit of at least 50 percent and a Young's modulus and thickness resulting in mechanical stiffness of the suspension in the range of 5-100 N/m. Various elastomers will meet this requirement. LSR is one example. In addition, even larger elastic strain limits, as high as 100 or 150 percent may be desired to accommodate large forces applied to the transducer when an ear-sealing earbud of which it is a component is inserted into or removed from an ear canal. Conversely, for applications where less displacement is needed, an elastic strain limit as low as 10 percent may be sufficient.
The piston and suspension are shown in more detail in
As shown in this example, the bobbin has an outer diameter matched to the inner diameter of the outer ring of the piston, so that the bobbin is contained inside the outer ring. This design contains any extra adhesive to the inside of the piston and outside of the housing ring, i.e., away from the gap between the piston and the housing, unlike in the example of
The process shown above etches a channel 525 through the wafer around the outer support ring, allowing the piston/support ring/suspension unit to be cut out of the substrate. Many such units can be formed simultaneously in a single substrate, held in place by the LSR layer, and cut out as needed by either mechanical means, RIE, or laser-cutting. The inner wall of the bulk Si remaining outside the outermost channel 525 may serve as an alignment guide to the cutting process. As noted above, housings and bobbins may be attached to the support rings and pistons in bulk before they are cut out of the substrate, and the housings may also serve as alignment guides for the cutting operation. Curing the LSR layer helps control the pretension in the surround, to make the stiffness of the surround more linear. Without pretension, bending stiffness dominates near the neutral axial position of the piston (with no magnetic forces applied to the voice coil). At some piston excursion, the tensile stresses in the surround begin to dominate and cause the stiffness to increase. The pretension due to curing makes the overall stiffness greater but much more linear. In some examples, curing the LSR at 150° C. roughly doubles the near-neutral position stiffness.
Another process flow is shown in
As compared to the first example, because the LSR is added late in the process, the top layer of photoresist is not needed.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that additional modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the inventive concepts described herein, and, accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional patent application 62/216,755, filed Sep. 10, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated here by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4817165 | Amalaha | Mar 1989 | A |
6847090 | Loeppert | Jan 2005 | B2 |
9961447 | Windischberger et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
20080123242 | Zhou | May 2008 | A1 |
20120160598 | Silver | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130156253 | Lemarquand | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150001651 | Faralli et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101373713 | Feb 2009 | CN |
102948170 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103283260 | Sep 2013 | CN |
Entry |
---|
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees dated Nov. 25, 2016 for International application No. PCT/US2016/050778. |
Shahosseini, Iman, et al.: “Optimization and Microfabrication of High Performance Silicon-Based MEMS Microspeaker,” IEEE Sensors Journal, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY, US, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2013 (Jan. 1, 2013), pp. 273-284, XP011486310, ISSN: 1530-437X, DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2012.2213807, Table I; Section IV.; figures 1,3,11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 23, 2017 for International application No. PCT/US2016/050778. |
Lemarquand, G., et al. “MEMS electrodynamic loudspeakers for mobile phones”, Applied Acoustics, Oct. 28, 2011; Journal Homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apacoust. |
Sturtzer, E., et al. “High Fidelity MEMS Electrodynamic Micro-Speaker Characterization” Journal of Applied Physics, American Institute of Physics (AIP), 2013, pp. 9. |
Je, S., et al., “A Compact and Low-Cost MEMS Loudspeaker for Digital Hearing Aids”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 3, No. 5, Oct. 2009. |
Shahosseini, I., et al., “Design of the silicon membrane of high fidelity and high efficiency MEMS microspeaker”, DTIP , May 11-13, 2011, Aix-en-Provence, France, EDA Publishing ISBN: 978-2-35500-013-3. |
Chen, Y.C., et al., “A Low-Power Milliwatt Electromagnetic Microspeaker Using a PDMS Membrane for Hearing Aids Application”, Microsystems Integration Laboratory, Department of Electronics Engineering & Institute of Electronics, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan, MEMS 2011, Cancun, Mexico, Jan. 23-27, 2011, IEEE, ISBN: 978-1-4244-9634-1/11. |
Shahosseini, I., et al., “Silicon-based MEMS microspeaker with large stroke electromagnetic actuation”, DTIP , Apr. 25-27, 2012, Cannes, France, EDA Publishing, 2012. |
Shahosseini, I., et al., “Towards High Fidelity High Efficiency MEMS Microspeakers”, IEEE Sensors 2010 Conference, ISBN: 978-1-4244-8168-2/10. |
Lefeuvre, E., et al., “Potential of MEMS technologies for manufacturing of high-fidelity microspeakers”, SociétéFrançaise d'Acoustique. Acoustics 2012, Apr. 2012, Nantes, France. |
Shahosseini, I., et al., “Effciency optimization of an electrodynamic MEMS microspeaker,” Société Française d'Acoustique. Acoustics 2012, Apr. 2012, Nantes, France. |
Je, S., et al., “A Compact, Low-Power, and Electromagnetically Actuated Microspeaker for Hearing Aids”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 29, No. 8, Aug. 2008. |
CN Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2019 for CN Appln. No. 20168006072601. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170078800 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62216755 | Sep 2015 | US |