Not Applicable
This invention pertains to protective headgear. More particularly, this invention pertains to helmets that protect against injuries from direct and tangential impacts to the head.
Concussions are a common problem in American football and other contact sports. Repetitive impact to the head can lead to very serious and long term injuries and related issues. Therefore, it is important that measures be taken to protect athletes, to reduce their risks.
Various types of sports helmets are used to reduce brain injuries, including skull and neck injuries, resulting from head impacts. Such helmets typically employ a hard outer shell in combination with internal padding made of an energy-absorbing material. A conventional helmet is generally designed to prevent skull fracture, and, to some extent, injuries associated with linear acceleration following a direct impact. Bio-mechanical research has long understood, however, that angular forces from a tangential impact can cause serious brain damage, including concussion, axonal injury, and hemorrhages. Neurological research studies show that angular or rotational forces can strain nerve cells and axons more than linear forces. It is thus desirable to have protective headgear that protects against both direct impacts and tangential impacts that cause rotational injuries.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, an helmet for protecting a user from an impact is provided. The helmet includes a shell configured to receive a human head. The helmet includes a plurality of structures coupled to the outside of the shell. Each structure is attached to a respective assembly, which in turn is recessed in a respective opening in the shell. Each structure moves independently of the other structures. The structures are capable of sliding tangentially across the outer surface of the shell. The respective assemblies are individually detachable from the shell.
Each assembly includes a biasing mechanism. The biasing mechanism absorbs the impact of a tangential impact to its respective structure. After an impact, the biasing mechanism biases the corresponding structure to slide back to its original rest position. In one embodiment, the biasing mechanism is an elastomeric donut.
Each assembly is mechanically detachable from and re-attachable to the shell. Thus, a user is able to swap out an assembly donut for a donut with different elastomeric properties.
Each structure includes an outer cell. The outer cell is resilient. In one embodiment, the cell is made of foam. The cell is capable of deforming upon being impacted. The cell biases to return to its original shape after impact.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a protective helmet is provided. The helmet includes a shell configured to receive a human head. A plurality of structures are independently coupled to the shell and are directly adjacent to the outer surface of the shell. Each structure moves independently of the other structures but is restricted to move laterally along the outer surface to the shell. When a structure is hit with an impact, the impact's magnitude is reduced as the impact is transferred from the structure to the shell.
In one embodiment, each structure can be independently replaced by manually detaching it from the shell. In one embodiment, each structure includes a cell made of foam with a specific resiliency, where an optimal resiliency is based upon field impact testing for a particular player position. In one embodiment, each structure includes both a back plate adjacent to the shell and a cell, where the back plates are farther away from each other than the cells. The cells have adjacent perimeters that are beveled at supplemental angles to one another.
In one embodiment, each structure is coupled to a respective assembly that in turn is coupled to the helmet shell. Each assembly includes an elastomeric donut whose top surface is coplanar with the outer surface of the shell. Each donut is capable of compressing and extending when its corresponding structure experiences a lateral impact. The compressing and extending of the donut extends the time of impact transfer from the structure to the shell, thereby reducing the magnitude of an impact transfer from lateral hit. In one embodiment, each assembly also includes a rectangular receiver configured to receive one or more vertical portions of a respective back plate.
In one embodiment, the donuts are elliptical and reduce the magnitude of a lateral impact a maximum amount when the impact is directly perpendicular to the donut's major axis. In one embodiment, there are vents directly between adjacent structures, thereby allowing greater freedom of lateral movement for each structure.
The above-mentioned features will become more clearly understood from the following detailed description read together with the drawings in which:
Apparatus 100 for protecting a user from lateral and direct impacts to the head is disclosed. Various elements are described generically below and are uniquely identified when pertinent to the discussion, for example, structures 120 are generally indicated as 120 with particular embodiments and variations shown in the figures below having a suffix, for example, 120-A, 120-B, 120-C.
A lateral impact upon a structure 120 will cause the structure 120 to rotate laterally relative to the frame 102-A and increase the duration of the lateral impact event. Thus, the structures 120 protect a user from the concussive effects of a lateral impact targeted at the user's head.
An impact perpendicular to the helmet 100, i.e., a direct impact upon a structure 120, will compress its respective cell 124 and increase the duration of the direct impact event. Thus, the cells 124 protect a user from concussive effects of a direct impact targeted at the user's head.
In other embodiments, cells 124 have a different cell density and compression force than the cells shown in
In this embodiment, vents 122-A, 122-B, 122-C allow for air flow to the user's head through air holes 202-A, 202-B, 202-C. Vents 122 also create spacing between structures 120 which allows structures 120 to rotate laterally along helmet without contacting other structures 120.
In other embodiments, vents 122 are in other arrangements, which are designed to create maximum spacing and minimal contact between the structures 120 during lateral movement of a structure 120. The likely direction of a structure's 120 lateral movement is based upon the likely impact vector on the helmet 100. The likely impact vector on the helmet is in turn is based upon, for example, a football player's position on a team. Thus, in other embodiments arrangements of the vents 122 and structures 120 are based upon a football player's position on the team.
In another embodiment, there are no visible vents and structures 120 completely cover the outer surface of frame 102.
In
The major axis of donut 204 shown in
Backplate 304 is contiguous with frame 102. Outer surface 310 of frame 102 is coplanar with, and shares a common tangent with, top surface 312 of donut 204 where frame outer surface 310 and donut top surface 312 are in contact. Both backplate 304 and frame 102 are made from injected-molded thermoplastic. In other embodiments, they are made from composite structures. The backplate 304 and frame 102 have a low friction modulus which allows backplate 304 and overall structure 120 to slide laterally relative to frame 102 during a lateral impact event. The low friction between backplate 304 and frame 102 allows the distortion of donut 204 to be the primary mechanism for managing the energy from the lateral impact.
However, receiver 208 and backplate 304 are locked and therefore structure 120 can only move laterally and not inward or outward, i.e., not move radially, relative to helmet frame 102.
Backplate 304 does not extend laterally as far as cell 124 in order to prevent backplate 304 from colliding into other backplates 304 during a lateral impact event. Spacing between backplates 304 allows some cell 124 deflection along the cells' perimeters when one cell 124 moves laterally into contact with another cell 124.
Donut 204 includes hollowed out volumes 206 that increases the ability of the donut 204 to extend or compress during a lateral impact event, thereby amplifying the possible lateral movement of structure 120. The configuration of these hollowed out volumes 206 can be modified to respond to a particular threat analysis where greater or lesser impact delay is required.
Donut opposing forces 704-A and 704-B from donut 204-A and frame 102 pushing back on impact force 702 are in line with impact forces 702-A and 702-B. Thus, any shearing effect on donut 204-A is minimal, in contrast with a helmet that positions donut 204 or another type of damper/shock absorber/impact delay device directly between frame 102 and structure 120.
Cell 124-A has beveled edges supplementary to the beveled edges of adjacent cell 124-B, allowing the two adjacent cells 124-A, 124-B to move independently with minimal interference from one another. In
As illustrated in
Because of the energy-absorbing capacity of the helmet structure, impact restitution vector 806 is reduced. The diminished restitution reduces the impact on players that contact the wearer's helmet. Other players are thereby protected.
The apparatus includes various functions.
The function of spreading out a lateral impact event over time is implemented, in one embodiment, by an external structure configured to receive the force from the lateral impact event and an assembly coupling the external structure to a helmet frame. The assembly is configured to extend or compress upon transfer of the force of the lateral impact event from the structure to the assembly.
The function of spreading out a direct impact event over time is implemented, in one embodiment, by an external structure attached to a helmet frame. The structure includes foam cells configured to compress upon receiving a direct impact.
The function of adding and removing protective cells from a helmet is implemented, in one embodiment, by a structure that includes a cell and a backplate. The backplate includes two vertical portions ending in hooks. A helmet frame includes a rectangular receiver dimensioned to receive the vertical portions and undercuts configured to capture the hooks.
The function of preventing a cell from rotating around its respective assembly is implemented, in one embodiment, by a receiver located in the assembly and a complementary shaped locking mechanism permanently coupled to the cell in a fixed position.
The function of reducing shearing stresses upon an assembly is implemented, in one embodiment, by positioning at least a portion of the assembly co-planar with the helmet frame and configuring the structure to move only in a tangential direction relative to the helmet frame.
Respective structures 1104-L, 1104-R, 1104-T, 1104-B are coupled to the frame 1102. The outer portion of the structures 1104 are respective cells 1110-L, 1104-R, 1104-T, 1104-B. The cells 1110 are resilient. The cells 1110 are made of foam. The cells 1110 are capable of deforming upon impact. After deforming from an impact, the cells 1110 bias to return to their original shape.
Each structure 1104 is capable of sliding tangentially on the shell outer surface 1204. Each respective structure 1104-L, 1104-R, 1104-T, 1104-B is capable of sliding in any direction 1106 on the shell outer surface 1204, although the magnitude of any direction 1106 is limited. Each respective structure 1104-L, 1104-R, 1104-T, 1104-B is capable of sliding independently of one another.
Structures 1104 have gaps 1112 between them to allow for greater freedom of sliding motion of the structures 1104. As shown in the gap 1112 between top structure 1104-T and back structure 1104-B, the adjacent faces of the structures 1104-T, 1104-B are essentially at supplementary angles to one another (supplementary in the sense of a spherical surface triangle in spherical geometry) to allow for more “give” against each other upon impact (see, e.g.,
The structures 1104 shown in
The movement 1106 of the structures 1104 is generally limited to sliding tangentially along the arcuate shell outer surface 1204. When protecting a user from a head impact, the structures 1104 remain in direct contact with the shell outer surface 1204, that is, the structures 1104 do not lift away from the arcuate outer surface 1204 of the shell 1102. In addition, the structures 1104 have minimal twisting movement, such that upon being impacted by an outside force the tangential sliding motion 1106 of the structures will be more perceptible than any twisting of the structures 1104 relative to the shell outer surface 1204.
The shell 1102 includes vents 1202 for air to cool the user's head. The structures 1104 are positioned to create gaps 1108 such that the vents 1202 are not blocked from the outside when the structures 1104 are in their respective rest positions.
The shell 1102 is hard and rigid, and generally has a regular arcuate contour 2502 on the outside top, sides, and back. The shell 1102 includes openings 1206-T, 1206-R, 1206-L (not shown), 1206-B. The structure of the openings 1206 do not rise outside the shell outer surface 1204, such that the upper peripheries of the openings 1206 follow the regular contour of the shell outer surface 1204. Each opening 1206 is configured to receive a respective assembly 1802. The openings 1206 are essentially oval. Each opening 1206 is configured to receive the same size and shape of assembly 1802, thereby making the assemblies 1802 interchangeable. In other embodiments, the openings 1206 are different sizes or shapes.
The openings 1206 include four receivers 1210 for four assembly anchors 1712. Each anchor 1712 latches to its respective receivers 1210 once the assembly 1802 is pressed fully into the opening 1206. Each opening 1206 includes a groove 1208. The groove 1208 is configured to receive a prying instrument, for example, a flathead screwdriver. In order to mechanically detach and lift an assembly 1802 that has been fully placed into an opening 1206 (see
The elastomeric donuts 1302 have varying physical properties, including hardness, compressibility, resilience, Young's modulus, and so on. An assembly 1802 and its donut 1302 may be switched out for a different assembly 1802 with a donut 1302 that contains different physical properties.
The donut 1302 is resilient. The donut 1302 is elastic. The donut 1302 is elastomeric. The donut 1302 biases to return to its initial shape. Various embodiments of the donut 1302 have differing elasticity and compression characteristics.
The donut 1302 is elliptical from the top plan view. In other embodiments, the donut 1302 is circular from the top plan view. The donut 1302 has a major axis 1316. The donut 1302 has a minor axis 1318. The donut 1302 has a center axis 1410. The donut top surface 1304 is sloped. The upper top surface 1306 is at a steeper angle that the middle top surface 1308, which is at a steeper angle than the lower top surface (i.e., the periphery) 1310. The donut top surface 1304 is configured to essentially follow the general contour 2502 of the shell outer surface 1204 (see
The donut 1302 includes an aperture 1312. The aperture 1312 is in the center of the donut 1302. The aperture 1312 is symmetrical from the top plan view. The aperture 1312 is centered in the donut top surface 1304. The aperture 1312 is centered in the donut bottom surface 1304. In other embodiments, the apertures 1312 is not centered in the donut 1302. The aperture 1312 extends from the donut top surface 1304 to the donut bottom surface 1402. The radius of the aperture 1312 at the donut top surface 1304 is greater (in all directions) than the radius of the aperture 1312 at the donut bottom surface 1402. The bottom of the aperture 1312 includes a rim 1314.
The aperture 1312 is configured to receive a hub 1502. A top plan view of the hub 1502 is illustrated in
The hub 1502 includes protrusions 1504. The protrusions 1504 extend from the hub top surface 1506. The remainder of the top surface 1506 slopes downward from the center. The hub 1502 includes a hole 1508 in the center that extends from the top surface 1506 and slopes inward on two opposing sides to the bottom surface 1606. The hub 1502 is rigid and solid.
The snap ring 1708 is configured to receive and encircle the donut 1302. The snap ring 1708 is rigid and made of a hard material, such as hard plastic. The snap ring includes a bulge 1710 that fits inside the channel 1404 of the donut 1302.
The snap ring 1708 includes two pairs of opposing anchors 1712. The anchors 1712 are slightly bendable inward and bias to return to their rest position. When placing the assembly 1802 in the shell opening 1206, the anchors 1712 are configured to be pressed past the assembly receivers 1210 and latch against the bottom surface ring 2004. The upper outer side 1714 of the snap ring 1708 slopes inward and is configured to rest on the shelf 1212 of the shell opening 1206.
The outer support ring 1702 encircles the bottom portion of the donut 1302. The outer support ring 1702 includes a ridge 1704 that is configured to fit inside a corresponding receiver 1408 that the bottom of the donut 1302. Extending from the ridge 1704 are teeth 1706 that are configured to fit snugly inside alcoves 1406. In one embodiment, the outer support ring 1706 is hard and rigid.
With the exception of the hub 1502, the top of the assembly 1802 follows the regular contour 2502 of the shell outer surface 1204.
With the exception of the fastener 1902 and recesses 1918, the backplate bottom surface 1916 essentially follows the regular contour 2502 of the shell outer surface 1204. Likewise, the structure 1104 bottom surface essentially follow the regular contour 2502 of the shell outer surface 1204.
When coupling the structure 1104-T to the shell 1102, the prongs 1904 are pushed into the top of hub hole 1508 such that the prongs 1904 extend past the hub bottom surface 1606. The hooks 1908 press up against the hub bottom surface 1606 at the lip 1064.
A retaining clip 1912 assists in securing the structure 1104-T to the assembly 1802. The retaining clip 1912 is inserted up through the bottom of the hub hole 1508. The clip 1912 includes counter-protrusions 1914. As shown in
Hub projections 1504 lodge in recesses 1918 in the backplate bottom surface 1916 immediately adjacent the fastener 1904, which assists in preventing the hub 1502 from rotating relative to the backplate 1902.
Each opening 1206 has an undersurface 2002 that extends upward in a concave curve. The undersurface 2002 distal end is a horizontal plateau in the shape of a ring 2004. Both the snap ring 1708 and the outer support ring 1702 extend past the opening ring 2004. Anchors 1712 from the assembly 1802 press and hold against the ring 2004, thereby keeping the assembly 1802 inside the opening 1206.
In order to detach an assembly 1802 from the shell 1102, the clip is pulled out from the underside of the shell 1102. The prongs 1906 are pressed inward and the structure 1104 is pulled off the shell outer surface 1204. A prying device (e.g., the tip of a flathead screwdriver), is lodged into groove 1208 on the outer surface 1204 and levered upward against the snap ring 1708. Anchors 1712 are pressed inward against the donut 1302 until the anchors are pulled past the ring 2004.
Cell 1110-T includes a recess 2302 on the inner surface 2304. The recess 2302 is shaped to receive and be flush with the backplate top surface 2306. However, as shown in
The impact 2602 creates a distortion 2064 in the cell 1104. Some of the energy from the impact 2602 is expended to create the cell distortion 2064. Some of the impact energy is converted to heat energy expended to change the shape of the cell 1104 and create the distortion 2064, and some of the energy from the impact 2602 is converted to potential energy stored in the compression of the cell 1104, which is released as the resilient cell 1104 returns to its original shape.
Some of the energy from the impact 2064 is absorbed in the form of potential energy stored in the distortion 2606, 2608 of the donut 1302. The impact 2602 causes the structure 1110 to slide tangentially 1106 over the shell outer surface 1204. Some of the impact energy 2064 is dissipated as heat to the extent that any friction exists between the sliding backplate 1902 the shell outer surface 1204. The hub 1502 is pushed to the right by the attached structure 1104, thereby distorting the donut 1302. A portion of the donut 1302 is stretched 2606, and a portion of the donut 1302 is compressed 2608. Both the stretching 2606 and compression 2608 convert energy from the impact 2602 into spring-type potential energy stored in the donut 1302. Some energy from the impact 2602 is also converted into heat energy during the process of altering the shape of the donut 1302.
As illustrated in
The shell 3402 is rigid. The shell outer surface 3404 is smooth. The shell 3402 includes openings 3420 that allow for insertion of assemblies 200. Thus, the embodiments displayed in
The elastomer 3202 fits flush against the outer surface 3404. Two clamps 3416, 3418 are affixed to the mask 3410 in a fixed position relative to the mask 3410. A first fastener set 3412-A, 3412-B extends through the clamp 3418, elastomer aperture 3206, and shell aperture 3408 to tighten the clamp 3418 around the mask 3410, tighten the clamp 3418 against the elastomer 3202, and press the elastomer 3202 against the shell outer surface 3404. In the displayed embodiment, the first fastener set 3412-A, 3412-B is a pair of male 3412-A and female 3412-B screw bolts with complementary threads.
A second fastener set 3414-A, 3414-B extends through the clamp 3416, elastomer aperture 3204, and shell aperture 3406 to tighten the clamp 3416 around the mask 3410, tighten the clamp 3416 against the elastomer 3202, and press the elastomer 3202 against the shell outer surface 3404. In the displayed embodiment, the second fastener set 3414-A, 3414-B is a pair of male 3414-A and female 3414-B screw bolts with complementary threads.
A clamp 3514-L is affixed to the mask 3410 in a fixed position relative to the mask 3410. An implement 3502-L is between the elastomer 3002-L and the clamp 3514-L. The implement 3502-L is in a fixed position relative to the clamp 3514-L and mask 3410. In the displayed embodiment, the implement 3502-L is a washer. The implement 3502-L does not touch the elastomer 3002-L but instead presses against the raised portion 3506-L of the shell outer surface 3404. The implement 3502-L is configured to move smoothly across the shell outer surface 3506-L while maintaining continuous contact with the outer surface 3506-L.
The elastomer 3002-L is affixed and bonded to the inside of an opening 3506-L that extends through the shell 3402. A fastener set 3512-L, 3510-L extends through the clamp aperture 3516-L, implement 3514-L, elastomer aperture 3004-L, shell opening 3508-L, and implement 3504-L. In the displayed embodiment, the fastener set 3512-L, 3510-L is a pair of male 3510-L and female 3512-L screw bolts with complementary threads.
The implement 3504-L does not touch the elastomer 3002-L but is pressed flush against a raised portion 3804 of the inner surface 3802 of the shell 3402. The implement 3504-L is configured to move smoothly across the shell inner surface 3804 while maintaining continuous contact with the shell inner surface 3804.
A clamp 3514-R is affixed to the mask 3410 in a fixed position relative to the mask 3410. An implement 3502-R is between the elastomer 3002-R and the clamp 3514-R. The implement 3502-R is in a fixed position relative to the clamp 3514-R and mask 3410. In the displayed embodiment, the implement 3502-R is a washer. The implement 3502-R does not touch the elastomer 3002-R but instead presses against the raised portion 3506-R of the shell outer surface 3404. The implement 3502-R is configured to move smoothly across the shell outer surface 3506-R while maintaining continuous contact with the shell outer surface 3506-R.
The elastomer 3002-R is affixed and bonded to the inside of an opening 3506-R that extends through the shell 3402. A fastener set 3512-R, 3510-R extends through the clamp aperture 3516-R, implement 3514-R, elastomer aperture 3004-R, shell opening 3508-R, and implement 3504-R. In the displayed embodiment, the fastener set 3512-R, 3510-R is a pair of male 3510-R and female 3512-R screw bolts with complementary threads.
The implement 3504-L does not touch the elastomer 3002-L but is pressed flush against a raised portion 3804 of the inner surface 3802 of the shell 3402. The implement 3504-L is configured to move smoothly across the shell inner surface 3804 while maintaining continuous contact with the shell inner surface 3804.
While the present invention has been illustrated by description of embodiments and while the illustrative embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and methods, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept.
This application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 15/822,545, filed Nov. 27, 2017, which is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 15/009,960, filed Jan. 29, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,143,256.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2143483 | Iglauer | Jan 1939 | A |
2296335 | Brady | Sep 1942 | A |
2780815 | Newland | Feb 1957 | A |
3128095 | Sharkey | Apr 1964 | A |
3155981 | McKissick et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3174555 | Pitman | Mar 1965 | A |
3186004 | Carlini | Jun 1965 | A |
3242500 | Derr | Mar 1966 | A |
3245087 | Marchello | Apr 1966 | A |
3274613 | Sowle | Sep 1966 | A |
3435460 | Grant | Apr 1969 | A |
3445860 | Rodell | May 1969 | A |
3787893 | Larcher | Jan 1974 | A |
3815152 | Bednarczuk et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3818508 | Lammers et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3859666 | Marietta et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3992722 | Rhee | Nov 1976 | A |
4044399 | Morton | Aug 1977 | A |
4106124 | Green | Aug 1978 | A |
4223409 | Lee | Sep 1980 | A |
4307471 | Lovell | Dec 1981 | A |
4599752 | Mitchell | Jul 1986 | A |
4660230 | Mayling | Apr 1987 | A |
4692947 | Black et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4744107 | Fohl | May 1988 | A |
4937888 | Straus | Jul 1990 | A |
4996724 | Dextrase | Mar 1991 | A |
5010598 | Flynn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5204998 | Liu | Apr 1993 | A |
5343569 | Asare et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5477565 | Hunt, Jr. | Dec 1995 | A |
5519895 | Barnes, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5522091 | Rudolf | Jun 1996 | A |
5633286 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
5724681 | Sykes | Mar 1998 | A |
5950244 | Founier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956777 | Popovich | Sep 1999 | A |
6065158 | Rush, III | May 2000 | A |
6154889 | Moore, III et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6226801 | Alexander et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272692 | Abraham | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292954 | O'Bradaigh et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6336220 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6421840 | Chen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7089602 | Talluri | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096512 | Blair | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7328462 | Straus | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7930771 | Depreitere et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8756719 | Veazie | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8776272 | Straus et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8826468 | Harris | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8927088 | Faden et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8955169 | Weber | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9032558 | Leon | May 2015 | B2 |
9060561 | Knight | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9072330 | Yoon | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9089180 | Phipps | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020152541 | Halstead et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20080163410 | Udelhofen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20120017358 | Princip et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130019385 | Knight | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031700 | Wacter et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130247284 | Izaki et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254978 | McInnis et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140000012 | Mustapha | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013492 | Bottlang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140068841 | Brown | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075652 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140109298 | Faden et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140173810 | Suddaby | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140208486 | Krueger | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215694 | Grice | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150033453 | Pannikottu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150135413 | Mayerovitch | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164173 | West | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150223547 | Wibby | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150230533 | Bancroft | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150237946 | Simpson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170215507 | Straus | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2941019 | Apr 1981 | DE |
1374284 | Oct 1964 | FR |
2566632 | Jan 1986 | FR |
WO2011121079 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sport techie website, Dated Dec. 2, 2015 “Building a Safer Helmet for Youth Football” http://www.sporttechie.com/2015/12/02/football-helmet-specifically-designed-protection-young-athletes/. |
Matthew Futterman, “Rethinking the Next Generation Helmet” Nall Street Journal Website Dated Dec. 24, 2015 http://www.wsj.com/articles/rethinking-the-next-generation-helmet-1450998090, written by Matthew Futterman. |
Bryan Gruley and Peter Robison, “This Football Helmet Crumples-and That's Good” Bloomberg Business, Dated Jan. 11, 2016 http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-vicis-football-helmet/. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15822545 | Nov 2017 | US |
Child | 16351471 | US | |
Parent | 15009960 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 15822545 | US |