Face mask that has a filtered exhalation valve

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6584976
  • Patent Number
    6,584,976
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 24, 1998
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 1, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A filtering face mask that covers at least the nose and mouth of a wearer and that includes an exhalation valve. The exhalation valve opens in response to increased pressure when the wearer exhales to allow the exhaled air to be rapidly purged from the mask interior. An exhale filter element is placed in one of several locations in the exhale flow stream to remove contaminants from the exhaled air. The face mask is beneficial in that it provides comfort to the wearer by allowing warm, moist, high-CO2-content air to be rapidly evacuated from the mask interior through the valve and also protects the wearer from splash fluids and polluted air while at the same time protecting other persons or things from being exposed to contaminants in the exhale flow stream.
Description




The present invention pertains to a face mask that has a filter element associated with an exhalation valve. The filter element allows the face mask to remove contaminants from the exhale flow stream.




BACKGROUND




Face masks are worn over a person's breathing passages for two common purposes: (1) to prevent contaminants from entering the wearer's respiratory track; and (2) to protect other persons or things from being exposed to pathogens and other contaminants expelled by the wearer. In the first situation, the face mask is worn in an environment where the air contains substances harmful to the wearer, for example, in an auto body shop. In the second situation, the face mask is worn in an environment where there is a high risk of infection or contamination to another person or thing, for example, in an operating room or in a clean room.




Face masks that have been designed to protect the wearer are commonly referred to as “respirators”, whereas masks that have been designed primarily with the second scenario in mind—namely, to protect other persons and things—are generally referred to as “face masks” or simply “masks”.




A surgical mask is a good example of a face mask that frequently does not qualify as a respirator. Some surgical masks are loose fitting face masks, designed primarily to protect others persons from contaminants that are expelled by the wearer. Substances that are expelled from a wearer's mouth are often aerosols, which generally contain suspensions of fine solids or liquid particles in gas. Surgical masks are quite capable of filtering these particles. U.S. Pat. No. 3,613,678 to Mayhew discloses an example of a loose fitting surgical mask.




Masks that do not seal about the face, such as some known surgical masks, typically do not possess an exhalation valve to purge exhaled air from the mask interior. The masks sometimes are loose fitting to allow exhaled air to easily escape from the mask's sides so that the wearer does not feel discomfort, particularly when breathing heavily. Because these masks are loose fitting, however, they may not fully protect the wearer from inhaling contaminants or from being exposed to fluid splashes. In view of the various contaminants that are present in hospitals, and the many pathogens that exist in bodily fluids, the loose-fitting feature is a notable drawback for such surgical masks. Additionally, masks that do not seal about the face are known to allow exhaled breath to pass around the mask edges, known as “blow by”, and such masks would not benefit from having an exhalation valve attached to the mask body.




Face masks also have been designed to provide a tighter, more hermetic fit between the wearer's face and the mask. Some tightly fitting masks have a non-porous rubber face piece that supports removable or permanently-attached filter cartridges. The face piece also possesses an exhalation valve to purge warm, humid, high-CO


2


-content, exhaled air from the mask interior. Masks having this construction are commonly referred to more descriptively as respirators. U.S. Pat. No. 5,062,421 to Burns and Reischel discloses an example of such a mask. Commercially available products include the 5000 and 6000 Series™ masks sold by 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn.




Other tightly fitting face masks have a porous mask body that is shaped and adapted to filter inhaled air. Usually these masks are also referred to as respirators and often possess an exhalation valve, which opens under increased internal air pressure when the wearer exhales—see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,827,924 to Japuntich.




Additional examples of filtering face masks that possess exhalation valves are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,509,436 and 5,325,892 to Japuntich et. al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,537,189 to Vicenzi, U.S. Pat. No. 4,934,362 to Braun, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,505,197 to Scholey.




Typically, the exhalation valve is protected by a valve cover—see, for example, U.S. Pat. Des. 347,299 and Des. 347,298—that can protect the valve from physical damage caused, for example, by inadvertent impacts.




Known tightly fitting masks that possess an exhalation valve can prevent the wearer from directly inhaling harmful particles, but the masks have limitations when it comes to protecting other persons or things from being exposed to contaminants expelled by the wearer. When a wearer exhales, the exhalation valve is open to the ambient air, and this temporary opening provides a conduit from the wearer's mouth and nose to the mask exterior. The temporary opening can allow aerosol particles generated by the wearer to pass from the mask interior to the outside. Conversely, projectiles such as splash fluids may pass from outside the mask to its interior through the temporary opening.




In many applications, especially in surgery and clean rooms, the open conduit that the exhalation valve temporarily provides could possibly lead to infection of a patient or contamination of a precision part. The Association of Operating Room Nurses has recommended that masks be 95 percent efficient in retaining expelled viable particles.


Proposed Recommended Practice for OR Wearing Apparel


, AORN JOURNAL, v. 33, n. 1, pp. 100-104, 101 (January 1981); see also D. Vesley et al.,


Clinical Implications of Surgical Mask Retention Efficiencies for Viable and Total Particles


, INFECTIONS IN SURGERY, pp. 531-536, 533 (July 1983). Consequently, face masks that employ exhalation valves are not currently recommended for use in such environments. See e.g.,


Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Health Care Facilities


, MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, U.S. Dept. Health & Human Services, v. 43, n. RR-13, pp. 34 & 98 (Oct. 28, 1994).




Face masks have been produced that are able to protect both the wearer and nearby persons or objects from contamination. Commercially available products include the 1800™, 1812™, 1838™, 1860™, and 8210™ brand masks sold by the 3M Company. Other examples of masks of this kind are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,307,706 to Kronzer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,807,619 to Dyrud, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,440 to Berg. The masks are relatively tightly fitting to prevent gases and liquid contaminants from entering and exiting the interior of the mask at its perimeter, but the masks commonly lack an exhalation valve that allows exhaled air to be quickly purged from the mask interior. Thus, although the masks remove contaminants from the inhale and exhale flow streams and provide splash fluid protection, the masks are generally unable to maximize wearer comfort.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,117,821 to White discloses an example of a mask that removes odor from exhaled air. This mask is used for hunting purposes to prevent the hunted animal from detecting the hunter. This mask has an inhalation valve that permits ambient air to be drawn into the mask's interior, and it has a purifying canister supported at the wearer's torso for receiving exhaled air. A long tube directs exhaled air to the remote canister. The device has exhalation valves disposed at the canister's ends to control passage of purified breath to the atmosphere and to preclude back inhalation of breath from the canister. The canister may contain charcoal particles to remove breath odors.




Although the hunting mask prevents exhaled organic vapors from being transported to the ambient air (and may provide the hunter with an unfair advantage), the mask is not designed to provide a clean air source to the wearer. Nor does it provide an attachment for an intake filter, and it is somewhat cumbersome and would not be practical for other applications.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In view of the above, a filtering face mask is needed that can prevent contaminants from passing from the wearer to the ambient air, that can prevent splash fluids from entering the mask interior, and that allows warm, humid, high-CO


2


-content air to be quickly purged from the mask's interior.




This invention affords such a mask, which in brief summary comprises: (a) a mask body; (b) an exhalation valve that is disposed on the mask body and that has at least one orifice that allows exhaled air to pass from an interior gas space to an exterior gas space during an exhalation; and (c) an exhale filter element disposed on the filtering face mask in the exhale flow stream to prevent contaminants from passing from the interior gas space to the exterior gas space with the exhaled air.




The invention differs from known face masks that possess an exhalation valve in that the invention includes for the first time, an exhale filter element that can prevent contaminants in the exhale flow stream from passing from the mask's interior gas space to the exterior gas space. This feature allows the face mask to be particularly beneficial for use in surgical procedures or for use in clean rooms where it would not have been used in the past. Also, unlike some previously known face masks, the invention can be in the form of a tightly-fitting mask that provides the wearer with good protection from airborne contaminants and from splash fluids. And because the inventive face mask possesses an exhalation valve, it can furnish the wearer with good comfort by being able to quickly purge warm, humid, high-CO


2


-content air from the mask interior. Thus, the invention provides increased comfort to wearers by decreasing temperature, moisture, and carbon dioxide levels within the mask, while at the same time protecting the wearer and preventing particles and other contaminants from passing to the ambient environment.




These and other advantages and features that characterize the invention are illustrated below in the detailed description and accompanying drawings.




GLOSSARY




In reference to the invention, the following terms are defined as set forth below:




“aerosol” means a gas that contains suspended particles in solid and/or liquid form;




“clean air” means a volume of atmospheric ambient air or oxygen that has been filtered to remove contaminants;




“contaminants” means particles and/or other substances that generally may not be considered to be particles (e.g., organic vapors, et cetera) but which may be suspended in air, including air in an exhale flow stream;




“exhalation valve” means a valve designed for use on a filtering face mask to open in response to pressure from exhaled air and to remain closed when a wearer inhales and between breaths;




“exhaled air” is air that is exhaled by a filtering face mask wearer;




“exhale filter element” means a porous structure through which exhaled air can pass and which is capable of removing contaminants from an exhale flow stream;




“exhale flow stream” means the stream of air that passes through an orifice of an exhalation valve;




“exterior gas space” means the ambient atmospheric space into which exhaled gas enters after passing through the exhalation valve and significantly beyond the face mask;




“filtering face mask” means a mask that covers at least the nose and mouth of a wearer and that is capable of supplying clean air to a wearer;




“inhale filter element” means a porous structure through which inhaled air passes before being inhaled by the wearer so that contaminants and/or particles can be removed therefrom;




“interior gas space” means the space into which clean air enters before being inhaled by the wearer and into which exhaled air passes before passing through the exhalation valve's orifice;




“mask body” means a structure that can fit at least over the nose and mouth of a person and that helps define an interior gas space separated from an exterior gas space;




“particles” means any liquid and/or solid substance that is capable of being suspended in air, for example, pathogens, bacteria, viruses, mucous, saliva, blood, etc.




“porous structure” means a mixture of a volume of solid material and a volume of voids which defines a three-dimensional system of interstitial, tortuous channels through which a gas can pass.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Referring to the drawings, where like reference characters are used to indicate corresponding structure throughout the several views:





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of a filtering face mask


20


that is fitted with an exhalation valve


22


;





FIG. 2

is a sectional side view of an exhalation valve


22


, illustrating a first embodiment of an exhale filter element


31


according to the invention;





FIG. 3

is a front view of a valve seat


30


that is utilized in connection with valve


22


;





FIG. 4

is a sectional side view of an exhalation valve


22


, illustrating a second embodiment of an exhale filter element


32


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 5

is a sectional side view of an exhalation valve


22


, illustrating a third embodiment of an exhale filter element


33


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 6

is a side sectional view of an exhalation valve shown


22


, illustrating a fourth embodiment of an exhale filter element


34


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 7

is a sectional side view of a mask


20


′ similar to mask


20


shown in

FIG. 1

, illustrating a fifth embodiment of an exhale filter element


35


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 8

is a sectional side view of a mask


20


″ similar to mask


20


shown in

FIG. 1

, illustrating a sixth embodiment of an exhale filter element


36


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 9

is a sectional side view of a mask


20


′″ similar to mask


20


shown in

FIG. 1

, illustrating a seventh embodiment of an exhale filter element


37


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 10

is a sectional side view of an exhalation valve


22


having an exhale filter element


38


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 11

is a sectional side view of an exhalation valve


22


having a detachable exhale filter element


39


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 12

is a front view of a filtering face mask


60


that has an exhale filter element


40


in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 13

is a front view of a full face filtering mask


70


, illustrating an exhale filter element


41


in accordance with the invention; and





FIG. 14

is a schematic view illustrating airflows when performing a Percent Flow Through Valve Test.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




This invention has utility with many types of filtering face masks, including half masks that cover the wearer's nose and mouth; full face respirators that cover the wearer's nose, mouth, and eyes; full body suits and hoods that supply clean air to a wearer; powered and supplied air masks; self-contained breathing apparatus; and essentially any other filtering face mask that may be fitted with an exhalation valve. The invention is particularly suitable for use with filtering face masks that have a porous mask body that acts as a filter.




According to various embodiments of the present invention, the exhale filter element may be placed upstream to the exhalation valve orifice in the mask interior so that particles in aerosols are collected before passing through the exhalation valve. In another embodiment, the exhale filter element may be placed between the mask body and the opening to the exhalation valve. In yet other embodiments, the exhale filter element may be placed downstream to the exhalation valve so that air passing through the exhalation valve subsequently passes through the exhale filter element. Other embodiments include an exhale filter element covering not only the valve housing but larger portions of the mask body and even the entire exterior of the mask body to provide increased filter surface area and lower exhalation resistance or pressure drop across the exhale filter element. The invention also can include embodiments where the mask cover webs or shaping layers act as the exhale filter element or where the valve cover is the exhale filter element.




In

FIG. 1

, there is shown a face mask


20


that has an exhalation valve


22


disposed centrally on mask body


24


. Mask body


24


is configured in a generally cup-shaped configuration when worn to fit snugly over a person's nose and mouth. The mask


20


is formed to maintain a substantially leak free contact with the wearer's face at its periphery


21


. Mask body


24


is drawn tightly against a wearer's face around the mask periphery


21


by bands


26


that extend behind the wearer's head and neck when the mask is worn. The face mask


20


forms an interior gas space between the mask body


24


and the wearer's face. The interior gas space is separated from the ambient atmospheric air or exterior gas space by the mask body


24


and the exhalation valve


22


. The mask body can have a conformable nose clip


25


(see

FIGS. 7-9

) mounted on the inside of the mask body


24


(or outside or between layers) to provide a snug fit over the nose and where the nose meets the cheek bone. A mask having the configuration shown in

FIG. 1

is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/612,527 to Bostock et al., and in U.S. Design Pat. Application Ser. Nos. 29/059,264 to Henderson et al., 29/059,265 to Bryant et al., and 29/062,787 to Curran et al. Face masks of the invention may take on many other configurations, such as flat masks and cup-shaped masks shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,807,619 to Dyrud et al. The nose clip may have the configuration described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,558,089 to Castiglione. The mask also could have a thermochromic fit indicating seal at its periphery to allow the wearer to easily ascertain if a proper fit has been established—see U.S. Pat. No. 5,617,849 to Springett et al.




The exhalation valve


22


that is provided on mask body


24


opens when a wearer exhales in response to increased pressure inside the mask and should remain closed between breaths and during an inhalation. When a wearer inhales, air is drawn through the filtering material, which can include a fibrous non-woven filtering material


27


(

FIGS. 2

, and


4


-


9


). Filtering materials that are commonplace on negative pressure half mask respirators like the respirator


20


shown in

FIG. 1

often contain an entangled web of electrically charged melt-blown microfibers (BMF). BMF fibers typically have an average fiber diameter of about 10 micrometers (μm) or less. When randomly entangled in a web, they have sufficient integrity to be handled as a mat. Examples of fibrous materials that may be used as filters in a mask body are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,804 to Baumann et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,419,993 to Peterson, U.S. Reissue Pat. No. Re 28,102 to Mayhew, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,472,481 and 5,411,576 to Jones et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,905,598 to Rousseau et al. The fibrous materials may contain additives to enhance filtration performance, such as the additives described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,025,052 and 5,099,026 to Crater et al., and may also have low levels of extractable hydrocarbons to improve performance; see, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/941,945 to Rousseau et al. Fibrous webs also may be fabricated to have increased oily mist resistance as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,399 to Reed et al., and in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 08/941,270 and 08/941,864, both to Rousseau et al. Electric charge can be imparted to nonwoven BMF fibrous webs using techniques described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,496,507 to Angadjivand et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,215,682 to Kubik et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,815 to Nakao.





FIG. 2

shows the exhalation valve


22


in cross-section mounted on the mask body


24


. Mask body


24


acts as an inhale filter element and includes a filter layer


27


, an outer cover web


29


, and an inner cover web


29


′. The inhale filter element is integral with the mask body


24


. That is, it forms part of the mask body and is not a part that subsequently becomes attached to the body. The outer and inner cover webs


29


and


29


′ protect the filter layer


27


from abrasive forces and retain any fibers that may come loose from the filter layer


27


. The cover webs


29


,


29


′ may also have filtering abilities, although typically not nearly as good as the filtering layer


27


. The cover webs may be made from nonwoven fibrous materials containing polyolefins and polyesters (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,807,619 and 4,536,440 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/881,348 filed Jun. 24, 1997). The exhalation valve


22


includes a valve seat


30


and a flexible flap


42


. The flexible flap


42


rests on a seal surface


43


when the flap is closed but is lifted from that surface


43


at free end


44


when a significant pressure is reached during an exhalation. The seal surface


43


of the valve generally curves in a concave cross-section when viewed from a side elevation.





FIG. 3

shows the valve seat


30


from a front view. The valve seat


30


has an orifice


45


that is disposed radially inward to seal surface


43


. Orifice


45


can have cross members


47


that stabilize the seal surface


43


and ultimately the valve


22


(FIG.


2


). The cross members


47


also can prevent flap


42


(

FIG. 2

) from inverting into orifice


45


during an inhalation. The flexible flap


42


is secured at its fixed portion


48


(

FIG. 2

) to the valve seat


30


on flap retaining surface


49


. Flap retaining surface


49


, as shown, is disposed outside the region encompassed by the orifice and can have pins


51


to help mount the flap to the surface. Flexible flap


42


(

FIG. 2

) can be secured to surface


49


using sonic welding, an adhesive, mechanical clamping, and the like. The valve seat


30


also has a flange


46


that extends laterally from the valve seat


30


at its base to provide a surface that allows the exhalation valve


22


(

FIG. 2

) to be secured to mask body


24


. The valve


22


shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

is more fully described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,509,436 and 5,325,892 to Japuntich et al. Unlike the valve described in these two patents, the valve


22


shown in

FIG. 2

has an exhale filter element


31


disposed in the exhale flow stream.




The exhale filter element


31


shown in

FIG. 2

is disposed between the filter material


27


in mask body


24


and the base


46


of the exhalation valve


22


. The exhale filter element


31


thus is located downstream to opening


52


in mask body


24


. Air that is exhaled by the wearer enters the mask's interior gas space, which in

FIG. 2

would be located to the left of mask body


24


. Exhaled air leaves the interior gas space by passing through an opening


52


in the mask body


24


. Opening


52


is circumscribed by the valve


22


at its base


46


. Before passing through the valve orifice


45


, the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter element


31


. The exhale filter element


31


removes contaminants that may be present in the exhale flow stream, for example, suspended particles in the wearer's exhaled aerosol. After passing through the exhale filter element


31


, the exhaled air then exits the valve orifice


45


as the free end


44


of the flexible flap is lifted from the seal surface


43


in response to a force generated by the wearer's exhaled air. All exhaled air should pass through the mask body's filtering material


27


or through the exhale filter element


31


. The exhaled air that passes through the mask body's filtering material


27


or the exhale filter element


32


then enters the atmosphere. Under ideal conditions, exhaled air is not allowed to enter the atmosphere unfiltered unless it inadvertently escapes from the mask at, for example, its periphery


21


(FIG.


1


).




The exhaled air that leaves the interior gas space through valve orifice


45


then proceeds through ports


53


in the valve cover


54


to enter the exterior gas space. The valve cover


54


extends over the exterior of the valve seat


30


and includes the ports


53


at the sides and top of valve cover


54


. A valve cover having this configuration is shown in U.S. Pat. Des. 347,299 to Bryant et al. Other configurations of other exhalation valves and valve covers may also be utilized (see U.S. Pat. Des. 347,298 to Japuntich et al. for another valve cover).




Resistance or pressure drop through the exhale filter element preferably is lower than the resistance or pressure drop through the inhale filter element of the mask body. Because exhaled air will follow the path of least resistance, it is important to use an exhale filter element that exhibits a lower pressure drop than the mask body, preferably lower than the filter media in mask body, so that a major portion of the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter media, rather than through the filter media of the mask body. To this end, the exhalation valve, including the exhale filter element, should demonstrate a pressure drop that is less than the pressure drop across the filter media of the mask body. Most or substantially all exhaled air thus will flow from the mask body interior, out through the exhalation valve, and through the exhale filter element. If airflow resistance due to the exhale filter element is too great so that air is not readily expelled from the mask interior, moisture and carbon dioxide levels within the mask can increase and may cause the wearer discomfort.





FIG. 4

shows an exhale filter element


32


disposed in another location. In this embodiment, the exhale filter element


32


is placed on the interior of the mask body


24


upstream to the opening


52


in the filter media. As in the previous embodiment, the exhaled air lifts flexible flap


42


upon exiting orifice


45


and then passes out ports


53


in valve cover


54


. Exhaled air passes through exhale filter element


32


before passing through filter media opening


52


and valve orifice


45


. As in other embodiments, the exhale filter element


32


may be secured to the mask in this location by, for example, mechanical fastening (e.g., snap or friction fit), ultrasonic welding, or use of an adhesive.





FIG. 5

shows an exhale filter element


33


that extends over and around the valve cover


54


of the exhalation valve


22


. The exhale filter element


33


is preferably juxtaposed tautly against the valve cover's exterior and is held between the mask body


24


and the valve seat


30


and valve cover


54


. When disposed in this location, the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter element


33


after passing through the ports


53


in the valve cover


54


. Embodiments such as this one may be advantageous in that placement of exhale filter element


33


downstream to the valve orifice


45


and flap


42


allows the exhale flow stream to strike the valve flap


42


unencumbered. That is, the downstream placement of the exhale filter element may avoid a momentum decrease in the exhale flow stream which could impede valve opening performance. The downstream placement may also be advantageous in that it provides better prophylactic coverage of the valve and can collect particles that could be generated by breakage of a condensation meniscus between the valve flap


42


and the valve seat


30


.





FIG. 6

shows an exhale filter element


34


that is located on the interior of the valve cover


54


. The exhale filter element


34


is held between the valve seat


30


and the mask body


24


and between the valve seat


30


and the valve cover


54


. Air that is exhaled thus passes through the exhale filter element


34


before passing through the ports


53


in the valve cover


54


but after passing through valve orifice


45


. The downstream location of the exhale filter element


34


in this embodiment may likewise be advantageous as described above in reference to FIG.


5


.





FIG. 7

also shows an exhale filter element that is located downstream to the valve flap


42


. The exhale filter element


35


has an expanded surface area relative to the other embodiments. The exhale filter element


35


extends completely over the exterior of the exhalation valve


22


and the mask body


24


. Because the exhale filter element


35


has a surface area that is slightly larger than the surface area of the mask body


24


(or the filter media


27


in the mask body


24


), less pressure drop would be exhibited across the exhale filter element


35


than the mask body


24


(when the same filter media is used in each), and therefore exhaled air will easily pass from the interior gas space to the exterior gas space through opening


52


in mask body


24


and through the exhalation valve's orifice


45


. Filter media


27


that is used in mask body


24


typically is a high performance media that exhibits very low particle penetration (see the above discussion and patents and patent applications cited above regarding BMF filter media, electret charging, and fiber additives). The particle penetration commonly is sufficient to meet NIOSH requirements set forth in 42 C.F.R. part 84. Particle penetration and pressure drop move inversely to each other (lower penetrations are commonly accompanied by higher pressure drops). Because less pressure drop would be demonstrated by element


35


when compared to mask body


24


, the embodiment shown in

FIG. 7

is advantageous in that the filter media used in the exhale filter element


35


can be a high performance media like that used in the mask body.




In

FIG. 8

the exhale filter element


36


also is disposed downstream to the ports


53


in valve cover


54


. Unlike the embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 7

, however, the surface area of the exhale filter element


36


is less than the surface area of the mask body


24


. The exhale filter element


36


is secured to the mask body


24


where the mask body's central panel


55


meets the top panel


56


and lower panel


57


. Although the exhale filter element


36


does not cover a surface area that is greater than the mask body


24


, it is nonetheless an enlarged surface area when compared to other embodiments. Thus, the exhalation filter element


36


may not necessarily be able to demonstrate the penetration and pressure drop values that are exhibited by the filter media


27


, but it may nonetheless be a very good performing filtration media that exhibits low particle penetration. If the inner and outer cover webs


29


and


29


′ add significantly to the overall pressure drop of the mask body


24


, then it may be possible that the exhale filter element


36


would be able to be as good a performing filter media as the filter media


27


used in mask body


24


.




In

FIG. 9

, the exhale filter element


37


is the outer cover web


29


. This embodiment is advantageous in that it may be relatively easy to manufacture. The product can be made by punching a hole through the other layers


27


,


29


′ in mask body


24


, followed by applying the outer cover web


29


after the holes are punched. The embodiment may be beneficial for a continuous line manufacturing process. Alternatively, the inner cover web


29


′ could act as the exhale filter element, and the outer cover web


29


could have a hole disposed therein. Or both layers


29


,


29


′ could act as an exhale filter element.




In

FIG. 10

, the exhalation valve


22


has an exhale filter element shown as a filtering cover


38


constructed of a sintered plastic or other material having sufficient rigidity as well as a porous structure that provides filtering capabilities. Examples of materials that could be used to produce a sintered valve cover include, VYLON HP (1 mm grain size), VYLON HP (2 mm grain size), VYLON TT1/119, and VYLON HP (2.5 mm grain size) all made with a polypropylene base material available from Porvair Technology Ltd., Wrexham, Clwyd, Wales, United Kingdom. The sintered or porous valve covers may be made from sheets produced from the grains. The sheet material can be cut into pieces that are assembled in the form of a valve cover. Alternatively, the grains can be heated and pressed over a tool adapted to form a valve cover. The valve cover


38


does not have the ports


53


like the valve cover


50


shown in

FIGS. 2

,


5


-


9


, and


11


. Rather, the air that flows through the valve


24


passes through the porous structure of the filtering valve cover


38


. Using this integrated configuration, an exhale filter element separate from the valve cover is not required.





FIG. 11

shows an exhalation valve


22


that has an exhale filter element


39


that is removable and preferably replaceable. The removable filter element


39


extends over and snaps onto the valve cover


54


using conventional or other fastening means. An impermeable layer (not shown) may be disposed between the valve cover


54


and the mask body


24


to prevent re-entry of exhaled moisture. The removable filter element


39


may be configured to snap onto and form a tight seal to the valve cover


54


or may be attached in other manners known in the art, e.g. pressure sensitive or repositionable adhesive bonding. The removable filter element


39


may possess a porous structure such as a thermally bonded nonwoven fibrous web, or it may be made of a sintered or porous material as described above. This embodiment allows the exhale filter element to be replaced before the mask has met its service life.





FIG. 12

illustrates a second embodiment of a cup-shaped face mask, generally designated


60


. The face mask


60


includes bands


62


that are connected to a mask body


64


and that extend around the back of the wearer's head and neck for retaining the mask against the face. The mask body


64


acts as an inhale filter element and is generally made of fibrous filtering material as described above and may also include inner and/or outer cover web layers—see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,307,796 to Kronzer et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,807,619 to Dyrud, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,440 to Berg. Similar to the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 1-7

, the face mask


60


may include an exhalation valve similar to the valve in the other embodiments. An exhale filter element


40


that covers the exterior of the valve cover (not shown) may be employed to prevent contaminants from entering the exterior gas space. The exhale filter element may be attached as illustrated above in FIG.


5


. The exhale filter element also may be positioned as described above in reference to the other figures. The face mask also may be configured in cup shapes other than the embodiments shown in FIG.


12


and the figures described above. The mask could, for example, have the configuration shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,827,924 to Japuntich.





FIG. 13

illustrates a full face respirator


70


that includes a mask body


72


, which typically includes a non-porous plastic and/or rubber face seal


73


and a transparent shield


74


. The mask body


72


is configured for covering the eyes, nose, and mouth of the wearer and forms a seal against the wearer's face. The mask body


72


includes inhalation ports


76


that are configured for receiving removable filter cartridges (not shown) such as described in Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company's Health and Environmental Safety brochure 70-0701-5436-7 (535)BE, dated Apr. 1, 1993. The ports


76


should include a one way inhalation valve that allows air to flow into the mask. The filter cartridges filter the air drawn into the mask before it passes through ports


76


. The mask


70


includes bands or a harness (not shown) to extend over the top of the wearer's head or behind the wearer's head and neck for retaining the mask


70


against the wearer's face. A face mask of this construction is also shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,924,420 to Reischel et al. and in U.S. Pat. Des. 388,872 to Grannis et al. and Des. 378,610 to Reischel et al.




The mask body


72


includes an exhalation valve


78


generally at the center lower portion of the mask


70


. The exhalation valve


78


may include a circular flap-type diaphragm (not shown) retained at its center with a barb extending through an orifice in the center of the flap. Such exhalation valves are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,062,421. The present invention also includes an exhale filter element


41


placed over the outer portion of the valve housing. The exhale filter element


41


may be placed in other positions along the exhale flow stream and proximate the exhalation valve similar to the locations shown in other figures. The exhale filter element


41


may be fashioned to be detachable and replaceable. The exhale filter element preferably is adapted such that its placement in the exhale flow stream allows the exhale filter element to reside in the path of least resistance so that the exhale filter element does not substantially discourage flow through the exhalation valve.




In all the embodiments shown, under normal circumstances substantially all exhaled air passes through either the mask body or the exhale filter element


31


-


41


. Although the air may engage the exhale filter element at various points in the exhale flow stream, no matter where positioned the exhale filter element enables contaminants to be removed from the exhale flow stream to furnish some level of protection to other persons or things while at the same time providing improved wearer comfort and allowing the wearer to don a tightly fitting mask. The exhale filter element may not necessarily remove all contaminants from an exhale flow stream, but preferably removes at least 95 percent, and more preferably at least 97 percent, and still more preferably at least 99 percent when tested in accordance with Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test described below.




To provide the wearer with good comfort while wearing masks of the invention, the mask preferably enables at least 50 percent of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element. More preferably, at least 75 percent, and still more preferably at least 90 percent, of the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter element, as opposed to going through the filter media or possibly escaping at the mask periphery. When the valve described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,509,436 and 5,325,892 to Japuntich are used on the respirator, and the exhale filter element demonstrates a lower pressure drop than the mask body, more than 100 percent of the air can pass through the exhale filter element. As described in the Japuntich et al. patents, this can occur when air is passed into the filtering face mask at a velocity of at least 8 meters per second under a Percent Flow Through Valve Test (described below). Because greater than 100 percent of the exhaled air passes out through the valve, there is a net influx of air through the filter media. The air that enters the interior gas space through the filter media is less humid and cooler and therefore improves wearer comfort.




The embodiments of the exhale filter element that are filters covering larger portions of the mask body have increased surface area so that resistance through the exhale filter element is effectively decreased. Lower resistance in the exhale flow stream increases the percentage of exhaled air passing through the exhalation valve rather than through the mask body. Different materials and sizes for the mask body and the exhalation valve filter can create different flow patterns and pressure drop.




Many types of commercially available filter media, such as the melt-blown microfiber webs described above or spun-bonded nonwoven fibrous media, have been found to be acceptable filter media for exhale filter elements. A preferred exhale filter element comprises a polypropylene spunbonded web. Such a web may be obtained from PolyBond Inc., Waynesboro, Va., product number 87244. The exhale filter element also could be an open cell foam. Additionally, if the mask uses shaping layers to provide support for the filter media (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,307,796 to Kronzer, U.S. Pat. No. 4,807,619 to Dyrud, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,440 to Berg), the shaping layers (also referred to as the molded mask shell material) could be used as an exhale filter element. Or the exhale filter element could be made from the same materials that are commonly used to form shaping layers. Such materials typically include fibers that have bonding components that allow the fibers to be bonded to one another at points of fiber intersection. Such thermally bonding fibers typically come in monofilament or bicomponent form. The nonwoven fibrous construction of the shaping layer provides it with a filtering capacity—although typically not as great as a filter layer—that permits the shaping layer to screen out larger particles such as saliva from the wearer. Because these fibrous webs are made from thermally bonding fibers, it can be possible to mold the webs into a three-dimensional configuration fashioned to fit over an exhalation valve as, for example, in the form of a valve cover. Generally, any porous structure that is capable of filtering contaminants is contemplated for use as an exhale filter element in the invention.




To lower pressure drop through the exhale filter element, it could be configured in an expanded surface area form. For example, it could be corrugated or pleated, or it could be in the form of a pancake shaped filter, which could be removably attached.




The exhale filter element preferably contains a fluorochemical additive(s) to impart better protection to the mask from splash fluids. Fluorochemical additives that may be suitable for such purposes are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,025,052 and 5,099,026 to Crater et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,804 to Baumann et al., and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/901,363 to Klun et al. filed Jul. 28, 1997. The fluorochemical additive may be incorporated into the volume of solid material that is present in the porous structure of the exhale filter element, and/or it may be applied to the surface of the porous structure. When the porous structure is fibrous, the fluorochemical additive preferably is incorporated at least into some or all of the fibers in the exhale filter element.




The fluorochemical additive(s) that may be used in connection with the exhale filter element to inhibit liquid passage through the element may include, for example, fluorochemical oxazolidinones, fluorochemical piperazines, fluoroaliphatic radical-containing compounds, fluorochemical esters, and combinations thereof. Preferred fluorochemical additives include the fluorochemical oxazolidinones such as C


8


F


17


SO


2


N(CH


3


)CH


2


CH(CH


2


Cl)OH (see example 1 of the Crater et al. patents) and fluorochemical dimer acid esters (see example 1 of the Klun et al. application). A preferred commercially available fluorochemical additive is FX-1801 Scotchban™ brand protector from 3M Company, Saint Paul, Minn.




In addition to or in lieu of the noted fluorochemical additives, other materials may be employed to inhibit liquid penetration such as waxes or silicones. Essentially any product that may inhibit liquid penetration but not at the expense of significantly increasing pressure drop through the exhale filter element is contemplated for use in this invention. Preferably, the additive would be melt processable so that it can be incorporated directly into the porous structure of the exhale filter element. The additives desirably impart repellency to aqueous fluids and thus increase oleophobicity and hydrophobicity or are surface energy reducing agents.




The exhale filter element is not only useful for removing contaminants and inhibiting liquid penetration, but it may also be useful for removing unwanted vapors. Thus, the exhale filter element may have sorptive qualities for removing such contaminants. The exhale filter element may be made from active particulate such as activated carbon bonded together by polymeric particulate to form a filter element that may also include a nonwoven particulate filter as described above to provide vapor removal characteristics as well as satisfactory particulate filtering capability. An example of a bonded particulate filter is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,656,368, 5,078,132, and 5,033,465 to Braun et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,696,199 to Senkus et al. An example of a filter element that has combined gaseous and particulate filtering abilities is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,763,078 to Braun and Steffen. The exhale filter element could also be configured as a nonwoven web of, for example, melt-blown microfibers which carries active particulate such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,971,373 to Braun. The active particulate also can be treated with topical treatments to provide vapor removal; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,496,785 and 5,344,626 both to Abler.




Face masks that have an exhale filter element according to the invention have been found to meet or exceed industry standards for characteristics such as fluid resistance, filter efficiency, and wearer comfort. In the medical field, the bacterial filter efficiency (BFE), which is the ability of a mask to remove particles, usually bacteria expelled by the wearer, is typically evaluated for face masks. BFE tests are designed to evaluate the percentage of particles that escape from the mask interior. There are three tests specified by the Department of Defense and published under MIL-M-36954C, Military Specification: Mask, Surgical, Disposable (Jun. 12, 1975) which evaluate BFE. As a minimum industry standard, a surgical product should have an efficiency of at least 95% when evaluated under these tests.




BFE is calculated by subtracting the percent penetration from 100%. The percent penetration is the ratio of the number of particles downstream to the mask to the number of particles upstream to the mask. Filtering face masks that use a polypropylene BMF electrically-charged web and have an exhale filter element according to the present invention are able to exceed the minimum industry standard and may even have an efficiency greater than 97%.




Face masks also should meet a fluid resistance test where five challenges of synthetic blood are forced against the mask under a pressure of 5 pounds per square inch (psi). If no synthetic blood passes through the mask, it passes the test, and if any synthetic blood is detected, it fails. Masks that have an exhalation valve and exhale filter element according to the present invention have been able to pass this test when the exhale filter element is placed on the exterior or ambient air side of the valve as well as on the interior or face side of the exhalation valve. Thus, the filtering face masks of the present invention can provide good protection against splash fluids when in use.




Wearer comfort improves when a large percentage of exhaled air freely passes out through the exhalation valve as opposed to the mask body or its periphery. Tests have been conducted where a compressed air stream is directed into the interior gas space of a face mask while measuring pressure drop across the mask body. Although results vary depending on the filter material used for the inhale filter element and also on the location and type of the exhale filter element in the present invention, it was found that at a flow rate of approximately seventy-nine liters per minute over 95% of the air can leave the interior gas space through the valve and less than 5% through the filtering material in the mask body when using a commercially available polypropylene spun bonded web material (87244 available from PolyBond of Waynesboro, Va.) as the exhale filter element.




EXAMPLES




Face masks that have an exhale filter element were prepared as follows. The exhalation valves that were used are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,892 to Japuntich et al. and are available on face masks from 3M Company as 3M Cool Flow™ Exhalation Valves. A hole two centimeters (cm) in diameter was cut in the center of 3M brand 1860™ respirator to accommodate the valve. The valve was attached to the respirator using a sonic welder available from Branson (Danbury, Conn.). 3M brand 8511™ face mask respirators that already possessed a valve were also used. The filter element was attached to the valve in several ways. In one embodiment, the filter element was welded in place between the valve seat and the mask body as shown in FIG.


2


. In another construction, the exhale filter element was placed over the valve cover and cut to extend about one-half inch beyond the valve on all sides. The exhale filter element was then ultrasonically welded to the outer lip of the valve cover as shown in

FIG. 5

using a sonic welder available from Branson (Danbury, Conn.). The exhale filter element can also be attached in this manner using an adhesive. In another construction, the exhale filter element was placed over the valve seat and beneath the valve cover as shown in FIG.


6


. The web material extending beyond the valve seat was then tucked under the seat, and the wrapped valve was placed on the mask body over the opening. The assembly of the respirator, filter web, and valve was then ultrasonically welded together. From inside the mask the excess filter web was cut away, leaving the valve orifice unobstructed and the filter web covering the valve and being sealed around the valve periphery. In another construction, the exhale filter element was attached to the outer edge of a filtering face piece using sonic welding or an adhesive to enable the filter element to cover essentially the entire mask exterior, including the exhalation valve as shown in FIG.


7


.




Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test




The face masks as described above were tested for bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) in a test modified from, yet based on, the Department of Defense standard MIL-M-36954C, Military Specifications: Mask, Surgical, Disposable (Jun. 12, 1975) 4.4.1.1.2 Method II as described by William H. Friedrichs, Jr. in


“The Journal of Environmental Sciences


”, p 33-40 (November/December 1989).




The face masks outlined in Table 1 below were sealed in an airtight chamber. Air was pulled by vacuum into the chamber through a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter and then passed through the respirator, from the interior gas space to the exterior gas space, at a constant flow of 28.3 liters per minute to simulate a constant state of exhalation. This caused the valve to remain open. A nebulizer (part number FT-13, 3M Company, Occupational Health and Environmental Safety Division, St. Paul, Minn.) was used to generate a challenge aerosol of polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres (available from Duke Scientific Corp., Palo Alto, Calif.) having a size similar to that of aerosols created by nebulizing


Staphylococcus aureus,


2.92 μm in aerodynamic diameter, on the inside or face side of the respirator. The challenge aerosol was not charge neutralized. The challenge was generated by squeezing the nebulizer at a rate of one squeeze per second and was sampled upstream in the interior gas space and then downstream in the exterior gas space using an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3310 from TSI Company, St. Paul, Minn.). The percent penetration was determined by dividing the concentration of particles downstream to the valve by the concentration of particles upstream to the valve and multiplying by 100. Only concentrations of particles in the size range of 2.74-3.16 μm were used to calculate penetration. BFE was calculated as 100 minus penetration. In vitro methods, such as this, have been found to be more stringent than in vivo methods, such as a modified Greene and Vesley test, described by Donald Vesley, Ann C. Langholtz, and James L. Lauer in “


Infection in Surgery


”, pp 531-536 (July 1983). Therefore, it is expected that achieving 95% BFE using the method described above would be equivalent to or greater than achieving 95% BFE using the modified Greene and Vesley test. Results of evaluation using the test method described above are shown in table 1.












TABLE 1











Results of BFE Testing of 3M ™ Cool Flow ™ Exhalation Valves






Having Exhale Filter Elements Mounted on 3M 1860 ™ Respirators













Ex-








ample




Exhale Filter Element Material and Construction




BFE









1




Molded Shell Material adhesively attached to valve cover




>98%







as shown in

FIG. 5







2




2 layers of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-colored polypropylene




>97.5







87244 spunbonded web* welded to valve cover as shown







in

FIG. 5







3




1 layer 50.1 g/m


2


polypropylene spunbonded web




>98%







containing 1.14%** fluorochemical dimer acid ester







additive*** and being welded to valve cover as shown in








FIG. 5







4




1 layer of 40 g/m


2


polypropylene spunbonded web




>97%







welded to valve cover as shown in FIG. 5











*All 1.25 oz. polypropylene 87244 spunbonded webs were obtained from Poly Bond, Inc., Waynesboro, Virginia.










**Percentages are expressed in these examples as weight percentages unless noted otherwise.










***See Example 1 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/901,363 to Klun et al. for description of this additive. Continued reference to this fluorochemical dimer acid ester in these Examples refers to the compound mentioned in Example 1 of the Klun et al. application. All additives in the Examples were melt processed into the fibers.













The data in Table 1 show that exhalation valves that possess exhale filter elements can achieve greater than 95% efficiency in a simulated bacterial filtration efficiency test.




Fluid Resistance Test




In order to simulate blood splatter from a patient's burst artery, a known volume of blood can be impacted on the valve at a known velocity in accordance with Australian Standard AS 4381-1996 (Appendix D) for Surgical Face Masks, published by Standards Australia (Standards Association of Australia), 1 The Crescent, Homebush, NSW 2140, Australia.




Testing performed was similar to the Australian method with a few changes described below. A solution of synthetic blood was prepared by mixing 1000 milliliters (ml) deionized water, 25.0 g Acrysol G110 (available from Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, Pa.), and 10.0 gm. Red 081 dye (available from Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, Wis.). The surface tension was measured and adjusted so that it ranged between 40 and 44 dynes/cm by adding Brij 30™, a nonionic surfactant available from ICI Surfactants, Wilmington, Del. as needed.




The valve with the valve diaphragm propped open was placed 18 inches (46 cm.) from a 0.033 inch (0.084 cm.) orifice (18 gauge valve). Synthetic blood was squirted from the orifice and aimed directly at the opening between the valve seat and the open valve diaphragm. The timing was set so that a 2 ml volume of synthetic blood was released from the orifice at a reservoir pressure of 5 PSI (34,000 Newtons per square meter). A piece of blotter paper was placed on the inside of the valve directly below the valve seat to detect any synthetic blood penetrating to the face side of the respirator body through the valve. The valve was challenged with synthetic blood five times. Any detection of synthetic blood on the blotter paper, or anywhere within the face side of the respirator, after five challenges is considered failure; no detection of blood within the face side of the respirator after five challenges is considered passing. The respirator body was not evaluated.




Results of fluid resistance testing according to the method described above on constructions with exhale filter elements of differing materials and mounted in differing positions are shown in Table 2.












TABLE 2











Fluid Resistance of 3M ™ Cool Flow ™ Exhalation Valves






Having An Exhale Filter Element Mounted on 3M 8511 ™ Respirator















Exhale Filter





Fluid






Ex-




Element





Resistance






ample




Position




Exhale Filter Element Material




Test Results









5




None




None




Fail






6a




Element




1 layer of 1.25 oz/yd


2






Fail







mounted




polypropylene 87244 spunbonded







between




web






6b




valve seat




2 layers of 1.25 oz/yd


2






Fail







and mask




polypropylene 87244 spunbonded







body as in




web






7





FIG. 2





110.6 g/m


2


polypropylene




Pass








spunbonded web containing 0.65%








FX-1801 Scotchban ™ brand








protector






8




Element




50.6 g/m


2


polypropylene




Pass







mounted




spunbonded web containing 0.66%







over




FX-1801 ™






9




valve cover




50 g/m


2


polypropylene spunbonded




Pass







as in

FIG. 5





web






10





1 layer of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




Pass








colored polypropylene 87244








spunbonded web and 1 layer melt-








blown, 75-85 g/m


2


85%








polypropylene, 15% polyethylene








web






11a





2 layers of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




Pass








colored polypropylene 87244








spunbonded web






11b





1 layer of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




Fail








colored polypropylene 87244








spunbonded web






12





2 layers 20.7 g/m


2


polypropylene




Pass








spunbonded web containing 0.62%








FX-1801 ™






13





1 layer of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




Pass








colored polypropylene 87244








spunbonded web and 1 layer melt-








blown 0.53 oz. polypropylene web








having an approximate fiber








diameter of 7 μm






14





1 layer 40 g/m


2


polypropylene




Pass








spunbonded web






15





molded shell material****




Pass






16





1 layer 50.1 g/m


2


polypropylene




Pass








spunbonded web containing 1.14%








fluorochemical dimer acid ester






17





1 layer 110.6 g/m


2


polypropylene




Pass








spunbonded web containing 0.65%








FX-1801 ™






18





1 layer 1.5 oz/yd


2


polypropylene




Pass








spunbonded web











****The molded shell material used in these Examples weighed approximately 4 to 6.5 grams per square foot and had the following composition:










70% Type 254, 65/35 core/sheath Cellbond ™ white polyester staple fiber 4 denier × 2 inch from Hoechst-Celanese Corp. (Salisbury, North Carolina)










30% Type 259, Trevira ™ with 70107 finish white polyester staple fiber 3.0 denier × 1 inch from Hoechst-Celanese Corp. (Salisbury, North Carolina)













The data in Table 2 show that exhalation valves of the invention were able to provide good resistance to splash fluids.




Percent Flow Through Valve Test




Exhalation valves possessing exhale filter elements were tested to evaluate the percent of exhaled air flow that exits the respirator through the exhalation valve as opposed to exiting through the filter portion of the respirator. This parameter was evaluated using the test described in Examples 8-13 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,892 and described here again in brief for ease of reference.




The efficiency of the exhalation valve to purge breath is a major factor affecting wearer comfort.




The filtering face mask respirators were mounted on a metal plate such that the exhalation valve was placed directly over a 0.96 square centimeter (cm


2


) orifice through which compressed air was directed, with the flow directed toward the inside of the mask like exhaled air. The pressure drop across the mask filter media can be determined by placing a probe of a manometer within the interior of the filter face mask.




The percent total flow was determined by the following method referring to

FIG. 14

for better understanding. First, the linear equation describing the mask filter media volume flow (Q


f


) relationship to the pressure drop (ΔP) across the face mask was determined while having the valve held closed. The pressure drop across the face mask with the valve allowed to open was then measured at a specified exhalation volume flow (Q


T


). The flow through the face mask filter media Q


f


was determined at the measured pressure drop from the linear equation. The flow through the valve alone (Q


v


) is calculated as Q


v


=Q


T


−Q


f


. The percent of the total exhalation flow through the valve is calculated by 100(Q


T


−Q


f


)/Q


T


.




If the pressure drop across the face mask is negative at a given Q


T


, the flow of air through the face mask filter media into the mask interior will also be negative, giving the condition that the flow out through the valve orifice Q


v


is greater than the exhalation flow Q


T


. Thus, when Q


f


is negative, air is actually drawn inwards through the filter during exhalation and sent through the valve, resulting in a percent total exhalation flow greater than 100%. This is called aspiration and provides cooling to the wearer. Results of testing on constructions having an exhale filter differing materials and mounted in differing positions are shown below in Table 3.












TABLE 3











Percent Flow Through the Valve at






42 and 79 liters/minute (LPM) of 3M ™ Cool Flow ™ Exhalation Valves






Having Exhale Filter Elements Mounted on 3M 1860 ™ Respirators

















Exhale Air









Flow









Through







Position of





Valve (%)















Ex-




Exhale Filter





@ 42




@ 79






ample




Element




Exhale Filter Element Material




LPM




LPM









19




None




None




76%




104%






20




Mounted




2 layers of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




31%




 41%







between




colored polypropylene 87244







valve seat




spunbonded web






21




and




1 layer 50.1 g/m


2


polypropylene




19%




 24%







respirator




spunbonded web containing







body as




1.14% fluorochemical dimer acid







shown in




ester








FIG. 2







22




Underneath




50.6 g/m


2


polypropylene




41%




 50%







valve




spunbonded web containing







housing




0.66% FX-1801 ™






23




but over




50 g/m


2


polypropylene




58%




 70%







valve




spunbonded web







diaphragm as







shown in








FIG. 6







24





1 layer of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




53%




 61%








colored polypropylene 87244








spunbonded web and 1 layer melt-








blown, 75-85 g/m


2


, 85%








polypropylene, 15% polyethylene








web






25




Over valve




2 layers of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




65%




 96%







housing as




colored polypropylene 87244







shown in




spunbonded web








FIG. 5







26




Over entire




2 layers of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




88%




112%







respirator




colored polypropylene 87244







and




spunbonded web







valve as







shown in








FIG. 7







27




Over valve




1 layer 1.5 oz/yd


2


white




47%




 71%







housing as




polypropylene spunbonded web







shown in








FIG. 5







28




Over entire




1 layer 50.1 g/m


2


polypropylene




78%




 97%







respirator




spunbonded web containing







and




1.14% fluorochemical dimer acid







valve as




ester







shown in








FIG. 7







29




Over entire




1 layer 97.4 g/m


2


polypropylene




48%




 73%







respirator




spunbonded web containing







and




1.16% fluorochemical dimer acid







valve as




ester







shown in








FIG. 7







30




Over valve




molded shell material




57%




 93%







housing as







shown in








FIG. 5







31




Over entire




2 layers 20.7 g/m


2


polypropylene




66%




 96%







respirator




spunbonded web containing







and




0.62% FX-1801 ™







valve as







shown in








FIG. 7







32




Over entire




1 layer of 1.25 oz/yd


2


turquoise-




66%




 99%







respirator




colored polypropylene 87244







and




spunbonded web and 1 layer melt-







valve as




blown 0.53 oz/yd


2


polypropylene







shown in




web having an approximate fiber








FIG. 7





diameter of 7 μm














The data in Table 3 demonstrate that good flow percentages through the exhalation valve can be achieved by face masks of the invention.




All of the patents and patent applications cited above are incorporated by reference into this document in total.



Claims
  • 1. A filtering face mask that comprises:(a) a mask body; (b) an exhalation valve that is disposed on the mask body and that has at least one orifice that allows exhaled air to pass from an interior gas space to an exterior gas space during an exhalation; (c) an exhale filter element that does not also serve as an inhale filter element, that comprises a fibrous filter, and that is disposed in the face mask's exhale flow stream to prevent contaminants from passing from the interior gas space to the exterior gas space with the exhaled air; (d) an inhale filter element for filtering inhaled air, wherein the inhale filter element is integrally disposed in the mask body such that air can pass through the inhale filter element during an inhalation or an exhalation, wherein the exhale filter element exhibits a pressure drop when a person exhales, which pressure drop across the exhale filter element is less than a pressure drop across the inhale filter element during the same exhalation, and wherein the inhale filter element includes a layer of fibrous filtering material that has an opening disposed therein, the exhalation valve being disposed on the mask body at the opening.
  • 2. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the inhale filter element is non-integrally disposed relative to the mask body.
  • 3. The filtering face mask of claim 2, wherein the exhale filter element is adapted such that the placement in the exhale flow stream puts the exhale filter element in a path of least resistance when a person exhales.
  • 4. The filtering face mask of claim 2, wherein the face mask has at least one filter cartridge that is supported by the mask body and that contains the inhale filter element.
  • 5. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the inhale filter element includes a web of electrically-charged melt-blown microfibers.
  • 6. The filtering face mask of claim 5, wherein the filtering face mask has a cup-shaped mask body.
  • 7. The filtering face mask of claim 6, wherein the mask body includes at least one cover web in juxtaposed relation to the filter layer.
  • 8. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element is disposed upstream to the opening in the filter material.
  • 9. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element is disposed between the layer of filter material and a base of the exhalation valve.
  • 10. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element extends over and around an exterior of the valve cover.
  • 11. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element is located on an interior of the valve cover.
  • 12. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover and wherein the exhale filter element extends over an exterior of the valve cover and the mask body, and wherein the exhale filter element has a total surface area that is greater than a total surface area of the filter material in the mask body.
  • 13. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element is disposed downstream to the exhalation valve and is attached to the mask body and has a total surface area that is less than a total surface area of the filter material in the mask body.
  • 14. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the inhale filter element includes a layer of filtering material and a cover web, and wherein a portion of the cover web, which is not positioned in a location for filtering inhaled air, acts as the exhale filter element.
  • 15. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein substantially all exhaled air passes through either the mask body or the exhale filter element.
  • 16. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhalation valve has a valve cover disposed thereon that is a porous structure, the porous structure enabling the valve cover to also act as the exhale filter element.
  • 17. The filtering face mask of claim 16, wherein the exhale filter element is removable.
  • 18. The filtering face mask of claim 16, wherein the valve cover is made of a sintered plastic.
  • 19. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element is replaceable.
  • 20. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 95% of the challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 21. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 97% of the challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 22. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the mask enables at least 50% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 23. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the mask enables at least 75% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 24. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the mask enables at least 90% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through valve Test at a flow rate of 79 liters per minute.
  • 25. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the mask is able to pass a Fluid Resistance Test.
  • 26. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element includes an additive that assists in inhibiting liquid penetration through the exhale filter element.
  • 27. The filtering face mask of claim 26, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven fibrous web that contains a fluorochemical additive.
  • 28. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element includes fibers that have a surface and that have fluorine atoms located at the surface thereof.
  • 29. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element is located downstream to the valve orifice.
  • 30. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhalation valve includes a flexible flap that lifts from a seal surface to place the valve in an open position in response to a force from an exhalation by the wearer, the exhale filter element being located downstream to the flexible flap.
  • 31. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains melt-blown microfibers.
  • 32. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains spunbonded polypropylene.
  • 33. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element includes an open-cell foam.
  • 34. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains thermally bonded fibers.
  • 35. The filtering face mask of claim 34, wherein the exhale filtering element is associated with a shaping layer in the mask body.
  • 36. The filtering face mask of claim 34, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a three-dimensional structure.
  • 37. The filtering face mask of claim 34, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a structure that is configured to extend over an exhalation valve flap.
  • 38. The filtering face mask of claim 1, wherein the exhale filter element is located on the mask body, the exhalation valve, or a combination thereof.
  • 39. A method of removing contaminants from an exhale flow stream, which method comprises placing the filtering face mask of claim 1 over at least a wearer's nose and mouth and then exhaling air such that a substantial portion of the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter element.
  • 40. A filtering face mask that comprises:(a) a mask body; (b) an exhalation valve that is disposed on the mask body and that has at least one orifice that allows exhaled air to pass from an interior gas space to an exterior gas space during an exhalation; (c) an exhale filter element that does not also serve as an inhale filter element and that is disposed in the face mask's exhale flow stream downstream to the exhalation valve orifice to prevent contaminants from passing from the interior gas space to the exterior gas space with the exhaled air; and (d) an inhale filter element for filtering inhaled air, wherein the inhale filter element is integrally disposed in the mask body such that air can pass through the inhale filter element during an inhalation or an exhalation, wherein the exhale filter element exhibits a pressure drop when a person exhales, which pressure drop is less than a pressure drop across the inhale filter element during the same exhalation, wherein the inhale filler element includes a layer of filter material that has an opening disposed therein, the exhalation valve being disposed on the mask body at the opening.
  • 41. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the inhale filter element is non-integrally disposed relative to the mask body.
  • 42. The filtering face mask of claim 41, wherein the exhale filter element is adapted such that the placement in the exhale flow stream puts the exhale filter element in a path of least resistance when a person exhales.
  • 43. The filtering face mask of claim 41, wherein the face mask has at least one filter cartridge that is supported by the mask body and that contains the inhale filter element.
  • 44. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the inhale filter element includes a web of electrically-charged melt-blown microfibers, and wherein the filtering face mask has a cup-shaped mask body.
  • 45. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the mask body includes at least one cover web in juxtaposed relation to the filter layer.
  • 46. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element extends over and around the valve cover's exterior.
  • 47. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element is located on the valve cover's interior.
  • 48. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element extends over an exterior of the exhalation valve and the mask body, and wherein a total surface area of the exhale filter element is greater than a total surface area of the filter material in the mask body.
  • 49. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element is attached to the mask body and has a total surface area that is less than a total surface area of the filter material in the mask body.
  • 50. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhalation valve has a valve cover disposed thereon that is a porous structure, the porous structure enabling the valve cover to also act as an exhale filter element.
  • 51. The filtering face mask of claim 50, wherein the valve cover is made of a sintered plastic.
  • 52. The filtering face mask of claim 51, wherein the valve cover is made of a sintered plastic that has been formed over a tool.
  • 53. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element is removable.
  • 54. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element is replaceable.
  • 55. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein substantially all exhaled air passes through either the mask body or the exhale filter element.
  • 56. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 95% of the challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 57. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 97% of the challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 58. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the mask enables at least 50% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 59. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the mask enables at least 75% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 60. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the mask enables at least 90% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through valve Test at a flow rate of 79 liters per minute.
  • 61. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the mask is able to pass a Fluid Resistance Test.
  • 62. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element includes an additive that assists in inhibiting liquid penetration through the exhale filter element.
  • 63. The filtering face mask of claim 62, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven fibrous web that contains a fluorochemical additive.
  • 64. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element includes fibers that have fluorine atoms located at the surface thereof.
  • 65. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhalation valve includes a flexible flap lifts from a seal surface to open the valve in response to a force from an exhalation by the wearer, the exhale filter element being located downstream to the flexible flap.
  • 66. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains melt-blown microfibers.
  • 67. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains spunbonded polypropylene.
  • 68. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element includes an open-cell foam.
  • 69. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains thermally bonded fibers.
  • 70. The filtering face mask of claim 69, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a three-dimensional structure.
  • 71. The filtering face mask of claim 70, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a structure that is configured to extend over an exhalation valve flap.
  • 72. The filtering face mask of claim 40, wherein the exhale filtering element is associated with a shaping layer in the mask body.
  • 73. The filtering face mask of claim 45, wherein the exhale filter element is located on the mask body, the exhalation valve, or a combination thereof.
  • 74. A method of removing contaminants from an exhale flow stream, which comprises placing the filtering face mask of claim 40 over at least a wearer's nose and mouth and then exhaling air such that a substantial portion of the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter element.
  • 75. A filtering face mask that comprises:(a) a mask body; (b) an exhalation valve that is disposed on the mask body and that has at least one orifice that allows exhaled air to pass from an interior gas space to an exterior gas space during an exhalation; (c) an exhale filter element comprising a fibrous web that is disposed in the exhale flow stream to prevent contaminants from passing from the interior gas space to the exterior gas space with the exhaled air; (d) an inhale filter element that is not the same filter element as the exhale filter element, the inhale filter element being supported by the mask body in a position to filter contaminants, wherein the inhale filter element is integrally disposed in the mask body such that air can pass through the inhale filter element during an inhalation or an exhalation, wherein the exhale filter element exhibits a pressure drop when a wearer of the mask exhales, which pressure drop is less than a pressure drop across the inhale filter element during the same exhalation, and wherein the inhale filter element includes a layer of fibrous filtering material that has an opening disposed therein, the exhalation valve being disposed on the mask body at the opening.
  • 76. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the inhale filter element is non-integrally disposed on the mask body, and wherein the exhale filter element is adapted such that the placement in the exhale flow stream puts the exhale filter element in a path of least resistance when a person exhales.
  • 77. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the inhale filter element includes a web of electrically-charged melt-blown microfibers, and wherein the filtering face mask has a cup-shaped mask body.
  • 78. The filtering face mask of claim 77, wherein the mask body includes at least one cover web in juxtaposed relation to the filter layer.
  • 79. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element is disposed between the layer of filter material and a base of the exhalation valve.
  • 80. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element is disposed upstream to the opening in the filter material.
  • 81. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element extends over and around the valve cover on its exterior.
  • 82. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element is located on the interior of the valve cover.
  • 83. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover and the exhale filter element extends over the exterior of the exhalation valve and the mask body, and wherein the surface area of the exhale filter element is greater than the surface area of the filter material in the mask body.
  • 84. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element is disposed downstream to the exhalation valve and is attached to the mask body and has a surface area that is less than the surface area of the inhale filter element in the mask body.
  • 85. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the inhale filter element includes a layer of filtering material and a cover web, and wherein a portion of the cover web, which is not disposed in a location for filtering inhaled air, acts as the exhale filter element.
  • 86. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhalation valve has a valve cover disposed thereon that is a porous structure, the porous structure enabling the valve cover to also act as the exhale filter element.
  • 87. The filtering face mask of claim 86, wherein the valve cover is made of a sintered plastic.
  • 88. The filtering face mask of claim 86, wherein the valve cover is made of a sintered plastic that has been formed over a tool.
  • 89. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element is removable.
  • 90. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element is replaceable.
  • 91. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the face mask has at least one filter cartridge that contains the inhale filter element.
  • 92. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein substantially all exhaled air passes through either the mask body or the exhale filter element.
  • 93. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 95% of the challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 94. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 97% of tit challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 95. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the mask enables at least 50% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 96. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the mask enables at least 75% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 97. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the mask enables at least 90% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through valve Test at a flow rate of 79 liters per minute.
  • 98. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the mask is able to pass a Fluid Resistance Test.
  • 99. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element includes an additive that assists in inhibiting liquid penetration through the exhale filter element.
  • 100. The filtering face mask of claim 99, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven fibrous web that contains a fluorochemical additive.
  • 101. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element includes fibers that have fluorine atoms located at the surface thereof.
  • 102. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element is located downstream to the valve orifice.
  • 103. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhalation valve includes a flexible flap that lifts from a seal surface to open the valve in response to a force from an exhalation by the wearer, the exhale filter element being located downstream to the flexible flap.
  • 104. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains melt-blown microfibers.
  • 105. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains spunbonded polypropylene.
  • 106. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element includes an open-cell foam.
  • 107. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains thermally-bonded fibers.
  • 108. The filtering face mask of claim 107, wherein the exhale filtering element is associated with a shaping layer in the mask body.
  • 109. The filtering face mask of claim 107, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a three-dimensional structure.
  • 110. The filtering face mask of claim 109, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a structure that is configured to extend over an exhalation valve flap.
  • 111. The filtering face mask of claim 75, wherein the exhale filter element is located on the mask body, the exhalation valve, or a combination thereof.
  • 112. A method of removing contaminants from an exhale flow stream, which comprises placing the filtering face mask of claim 75 over at least a wearer's nose and mouth and then exhaling air such that a substantial portion of the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter element.
  • 113. A filtering face mask that comprises:(a) a mask body; (b) an exhalation valve that is disposed on the mask body and that has at least one orifice that allows exhaled air to pass from an interior gas space to an exterior gas space during an exhalation; (c) an exhale filter element that is disposed in the exhale flow stream downstream to the orifice to prevent contaminants from passing from the interior gas space to the exterior gas space with the exhaled air; (d) an inhale filter element that is not the same filter element as the exhale filter element, the inhale filter element being supported by the mask body in a position to filter contaminants, wherein the inhale filter element is integrally disposed in the mask body such that air can pass through it during an inhalation or an exhalation, wherein the exhale filter element exhibits a pressure drop across it when a person exhales, which pressure drop is less than a pressure drop across the inhale filter element during the same exhalation, and wherein the inhale filter element includes a layer of filter material that has an opening disposed therein, the exhalation valve being disposed on the mask body at the opening.
  • 114. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the inhale filter element is non-integrally disposed relative to the mask body.
  • 115. The filtering face mask of claim 114, wherein the exhale filter element is adapted such that the placement in the exhale flow stream puts the exhale filter element in a path of least resistance when a person exhales.
  • 116. The filtering face mask of claim 114, wherein the face mask has at least one filter cartridge that is supported by the mask body and that contains the inhale filter element.
  • 117. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the inhale filter element includes a web of electrically-charged melt-blown microfibers, and wherein the filtering face mask has a cup-shaped mask body.
  • 118. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the mask body includes at least one cover web in juxtaposed relation to the filter layer.
  • 119. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element extends over and around an exterior of the valve cover.
  • 120. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhalation valve includes a valve cover, and wherein the exhale filter element is located on the interior of an valve cover.
  • 121. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element extends over an exterior of the exhalation valve and the mask body, and wherein the surface area of the exhale filter element is greater than the surface area of the filter material in the mask body.
  • 122. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element is attached to the mask body and has a total surface area that is less than a total surface area of the filter material in the mask body.
  • 123. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhalation valve has a valve cover disposed thereon that is a porous structure, the porous structure enabling the valve cover to also act as an exhale filter element.
  • 124. The filtering face mask of claim 123, wherein the valve cover is made of a sintered plastic.
  • 125. The filtering face mask of claim 123, wherein the valve cover is made of a sintered plastic that has been formed over a tool.
  • 126. The filtering face mask of claim 123, wherein the exhale filter element is removable.
  • 127. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element is replaceable.
  • 128. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein substantially all exhaled air passes through either the mask body or the exhale filter element.
  • 129. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 95% of the challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 130. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element removes at least 97% of the challenge when tested in accordance with a Bacterial Filtration Efficiency Test.
  • 131. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the mask enables at least 50% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 132. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the mask enables at least 75% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through Valve Test at a flow rate of 42 liters per minute.
  • 133. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the mask enables at least 90% of air that enters the interior gas space to pass through the exhale filter element when tested in accordance with a Percent Flow Through valve Test at a flow rate of 79 liters per minute.
  • 134. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the mask is able to pass a Fluid Resistance Test.
  • 135. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element includes an additive that assists in inhibiting liquid penetration through the exhale filter element.
  • 136. The filtering face mask of claim 135, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven fibrous web that contains a fluorochemical additive.
  • 137. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element includes fibers that have fluorine atoms located at the surface thereof.
  • 138. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhalation valve includes a flexible flap lifts from a seal surface to open the valve in response to a force from an exhalation by the wearer, the exhale filter element being located downstream to the flexible flap.
  • 139. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains melt-blown microfibers.
  • 140. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains spunbonded polypropylene.
  • 141. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element includes an open-cell foam.
  • 142. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element includes a nonwoven web that contains thermally bonded fibers.
  • 143. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filtering element is associated with a shaping layer in the mask body.
  • 144. The filtering face mask of claim 143, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a three-dimensional structure.
  • 145. The filtering face mask of claim 143, wherein the exhale filter element is molded into a structure that is configured to extend over an exhalation valve flap.
  • 146. The filtering face mask of claim 113, wherein the exhale filter element is located on the mask body, the exhalation valve, or a combination thereof.
  • 147. A method of removing contaminants from an exhale flow stream, which comprises placing the filtering face mask of claim 113 over at least a wearer's nose and mouth and then exhaling air such that a substantial portion of the exhaled air passes through the exhale filter element.
US Referenced Citations (69)
Number Name Date Kind
896447 Hall et al. Aug 1908 A
1013541 Fleuss et al. Jan 1912 A
1625419 McCaa Apr 1927 A
1925764 Le Duc Sep 1933 A
2111995 Schwartz Mar 1938 A
2284949 Cover Jun 1942 A
2435721 Lehmann Feb 1948 A
2744525 Whipple May 1956 A
2898908 Sovinsky Aug 1959 A
2983271 Beck May 1961 A
3473165 Gran et al. Oct 1969 A
3550588 Stahl Dec 1970 A
3603313 Arblaster Sep 1971 A
3971369 Aspelin et al. Jul 1976 A
4141703 Mulchi Feb 1979 A
4215682 Kubik et al. Aug 1980 A
4231364 Speshyock Nov 1980 A
4414973 Matheson et al. Nov 1983 A
4454881 Huber et al. Jun 1984 A
4537189 Vicenzi Aug 1985 A
4549543 Moon Oct 1985 A
4558708 Labuda et al. Dec 1985 A
4598704 Bordoni et al. Jul 1986 A
4763645 Kapp Aug 1988 A
4765325 Crutchfield Aug 1988 A
4774942 Moellers Oct 1988 A
4813948 Insley Mar 1989 A
4827924 Japuntich et al. May 1989 A
4850346 Michel et al. Jul 1989 A
4873972 Magidson et al. Oct 1989 A
4874399 Reed et al. Oct 1989 A
4901716 Stackhouse et al. Feb 1990 A
4921645 Insley May 1990 A
4934362 Braun Jun 1990 A
5016625 Hsu et al. May 1991 A
5035240 Braun et al. Jul 1991 A
5036840 Wallace Aug 1991 A
5062421 Burns et al. Nov 1991 A
5086768 Niemeyer Feb 1992 A
5091102 Sheridan Feb 1992 A
5117821 White Jun 1992 A
5325892 Japuntich et al. Jul 1994 A
5357947 Adler Oct 1994 A
5364615 Debs et al. Nov 1994 A
5366726 Debs et al. Nov 1994 A
5374458 Burgio Dec 1994 A
5479920 Piper et al. Jan 1996 A
5505197 Scholey Apr 1996 A
5509436 Japuntich et al. Apr 1996 A
5560354 Berthon-Jones et al. Oct 1996 A
5595173 Dodd, Jr. Jan 1997 A
5597645 Pike et al. Jan 1997 A
5641555 Berrigan et al. Jun 1997 A
5643507 Berrigan et al. Jul 1997 A
5657752 Landis et al. Aug 1997 A
5658640 Berrigan et al. Aug 1997 A
5658641 Berrigan et al. Aug 1997 A
5676133 Hickle et al. Oct 1997 A
5690949 Weimer et al. Nov 1997 A
5735265 Flynn Apr 1998 A
5772884 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5834386 Cohen Nov 1998 A
5941244 Yamazaki et al. Aug 1999 A
5983894 Fukunaga et al. Nov 1999 A
6003511 Fukunaga et al. Dec 1999 A
6014971 Danisch et al. Jan 2000 A
6250299 Danisch et al. Jun 2001 B1
6279572 Danisch et al. Aug 2001 B1
6460539 Japuntich et al. Oct 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
666367 Oct 1938 DE
0281650 Sep 1988 EP
0697225 Feb 1996 EP
746196 May 1933 FR
857420 Sep 1940 FR
2233905 Jan 1991 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language, 2 ed. G. & C. Merriam Co., Apr. 1937.*
Australian Standard® Surgical Face Masks (AS 4381-1996).
Greene, V.W. et al., Methods For Evaluating Effectiveness of Surgical Masks, Journal of Bacteriology, pp. 663-667 (1962).
Friedrichs, Jr. W.H., Measuring Face Mask Performance: A Real Test, Journal of Environmental Sciences, pp. 33-40, vol. 32, No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 1989).
Vesley,. D. et al., Clinical Implications of Surgical Mask Retention Efficiencies for Viable and Total Particles, Infections In Surgery, pp. 531-536, 533 (Jul. 1983).
Proposed Recommended Practice for OR Wearing Apparel, AORN Journal, v. 33, n. 1, pp. 100-104, 101 (Jan. 1981).
Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Health Care Facilities, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, U.S. Dept. Health & Human Services, v. 43, n. RR-13, pp. 34 & 98 (Oct. 28, 1994).
Standards, Recommended Practices, and Guidelines, Association of Operating Room Nurses, Inc., pp. 144-145 (1997).