The present disclosure relates generally to data processing, and more specifically to mechanisms that may be employed by an Application Delivery Controller (ADC) to prevent a denial of service attack in various network configurations.
According to some embodiments, the present technology is directed to a method for facilitating a secure network by a network device. The method may include: (a) receiving a data packet with information from a client indicating that the client is a trusted source; (b) embedding in the data packet a transmission control protocol (TCP) options header, the TCP options header comprising information including at least a sequence number for a protocol connection; and (c) forwarding the embedded data packet to a server.
According to other embodiments, the present technology is directed to a method for facilitating a secure network by a network device. The method may include: (a) receiving, at the network device, a data packet with information from a client indicating that the client is a trusted source; (b) modifying an Internet protocol (IP) header of the data packet with an encoded value from an index table; and (c) forwarding the data packet with the modified IP header to a server.
According to some embodiments, the present technology is directed to a method that comprises: (a) receiving a data packet with information from a client indicating that the client is a trusted source; (b) communicating, in a first channel established between the network device and a server, connection parameters included in a synchronization (SYN) packet received from the client, the connection parameters comprising parameters necessary for efficient data transfer over the secure network; and (c) forwarding, in a second channel established between the network device and the server, data packets of a data flow from the client.
According to other embodiments, the present technology is directed to an application delivery controller comprising: (a) a processor; and (b) a memory for storing executable instructions, the processor being configured to execute the instructions to: (i) receive a data packet with information from a client indicating that the client is a trusted source; (ii) perform either: (1) an embedding of transmission control protocol (TCP) options header in the data packet, the TCP options header comprising parameters for a protocol connection or (2) a modification of an Internet protocol (IP) header of the data packet with an encoded value from an index table; and (iii) forward the embedded or modified data packet to a server.
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the presented concepts. The presented concepts may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail so as to not unnecessarily obscure the described concepts. While some concepts will be described in conjunction with the specific embodiments, it will be understood that these embodiments are not intended to be limiting.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” or “according to one embodiment” (or other phrases having similar import) at various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. Furthermore, depending on the context of discussion herein, a singular term may include its plural forms and a plural term may include its singular form. Similarly, a hyphenated term (e.g., “on-demand”) may be occasionally interchangeably used with its non-hyphenated version (e.g., “on demand”), a capitalized entry (e.g., “Software”) may be interchangeably used with its non-capitalized version (e.g., “software”), a plural term may be indicated with or without an apostrophe (e.g., PE's or PEs), and an italicized term (e.g., “N+1”) may be interchangeably used with its non-italicized version (e.g., “N+1”). Such occasional interchangeable uses shall not be considered inconsistent with each other.
It is noted at the outset that the terms “coupled,” “connected”, “connecting,” “electrically connected,” etc., are used interchangeably herein to generally refer to the condition of being electrically/electronically connected. Similarly, a first entity is considered to be in “communication” with a second entity (or entities) when the first entity electrically sends and/or receives (whether through wireline or wireless means) information signals (whether containing data information or non-data/control information) to the second entity regardless of the type (analog or digital) of those signals. It is further noted that various figures (including component diagrams) shown and discussed herein are for illustrative purpose only, and are not drawn to scale.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The present disclosure relates generally to data processing, more specifically to mechanisms that may be employed by an Application Delivery Controller (ADC) to prevent a denial of service attack in various network configurations.
Websites, web and mobile applications, cloud computing, and various web and mobile services have been rising in popularity. Some examples of fast growing consumer services include smart phone applications, location based services, navigation services, e-book services, video applications, music applications, Internet television services, and so forth. Subsequently, more and more servers are deployed within data networks including the Internet to accommodate the increasing computing and data storage needs. These servers are typically arranged in data centers or web farms, which may include ADCs, GSLB and/or server load balancers (SLBs).
In TCP/IP networks, one method of establishing a connection between two network devices such as a client device and a server, is through the use of a SYN packet, also sometimes referred to as a SYN flag. In this scenario, the client device that wishes to establish the connection first sends a SYN packet to the server. The SYN packet may comprise information within it such as the source IP address, source port, destination IP address, destination port, timestamp, maximum segment size, window scale, a sequence number for the connection, and other types of information.
Once the server receives the SYN packet, it typically responds with a SYN/ACK (or SYN acknowledgement) to acknowledge receipt of the SYN packet and the request to establish a connection. Upon receipt of the SYN/ACK, the client device typically responds with an acknowledgement ACK packet (the authentication acknowledgement), and the network connection is established, such that the two devices can now send data back and forth over the network. Typically, before the connection has actually been established, the server creates a session entry when it receives the SYN packet and keeps track of the information in the client's SYN packet for the connection (source and destination ports, source and destination IP addresses, timestamp, window scale, sequence number, and so forth).
However, this type of connection is vulnerable to a SYN attack. In a typical SYN attack, the server gets overwhelmed by SYN packets coming in at a faster rate than it can process them. This may lead to a denial of service response by the server, because the server is overwhelmed by the sheer number of SYN packets it receives. Because the server doesn't have enough resources to respond to all of the requests, the server may become unable to respond to any of the requests.
To help protect against these types of attacks, a server may utilize a SYN-cookie. When the server receives a SYN packet from a client device, it may generate a SYN-cookie that contains values based on the information in the original SYN packet. If the client device is a legitimate device and not a botnet, it will return to the server an ACK data packet, or authentication acknowledgement data packet, which contains the information from the SYN-cookie. The server then validates the sequence number and/or other information with the SYN-cookie and re-computes the original values from the SYN packet such as the client device's sequence number, window size, timestamp, maximum segment size, and so forth. The server does not create a session entry for the connection until it receives the ACK packet, thus preventing a botnet from overwhelming a server and taking it down by sending SYN packets.
Conventionally, an ADC is a network device disposed in a datacenter and part of an application delivery network (ADN). The ADC may allow performing common tasks, normally done by web servers, in an effort to remove some load from the web servers. ADCs are typically placed between the firewall/router and the host (web) servers. In addition, conventional ADCs may include various features providing for compression, caching, connection multiplexing, application layer security, and content switching. These features may be combined with basic server load balancing, content manipulation, advanced routing strategies, and highly configurable server health monitoring.
Additionally, ADCs may manage load balancing and delivery of service sessions from client host computers to servers based at least in part on incoming service requests. As more servers are deployed, additional ADCs may be deployed. Similarly, as more servers are pooled together within the data center or spread across multiple data centers to provide scalability, ADCs may become bottlenecks slowing data transmissions between peers on the network.
Because the ADC network device is typically placed between the firewall/router and the host (web) server, it may also be utilized for screening to ensure that the client host computer requesting to connect with the server is from a trusted source. However, routing all network traffic to and from the host servers through the ADCs may cause the ADCs to become a bottleneck. To prevent this from happening and to ease some of the burden on the ADCs, an “asymmetric” network, also referred to as “direct server return” configuration may be deployed. In this configuration, the client device's request for services may be forwarded to the server once the server device has been selected, but the response from the server may be sent directly to the client instead of being routed back through an ADC.
Deploying an ADC in such a TCP/IP network means that three devices must now communicate with each other. In order to send and receive data, the client device, ADC, and server need to maintain the sequence numbers for the connection. In a symmetric network configuration, the ADC can function as the intermediary between the client device and server; it can establish a two-way connection between itself and the client, and also another two-way connection between itself and the server. In this way, the ADC can facilitate the transfer of data back and forth between the client device and server. However, in an asymmetric network configuration, the ADC does not receive the traffic back from the server, and thus cannot serve as the intermediary. Therefore, the ADC needs to pass along the parameters from the client's SYN packet to the server, such that when the server sends back response data, it maintains the same characteristics contained in the original SYN and SYN/ACK packets including, but not limited to, sequence numbers, maximum segment size, window scale, timestamp, etc.
Embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented using a variety of technologies. For example, the methods described herein may be implemented in software executing on a computer system or in hardware utilizing either a combination of microprocessors or other specially designed application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices like FPGA's, or various combinations thereof. In particular, the methods described herein may be implemented by a series of computer-executable instructions residing on a storage medium such as a disk drive, or computer-readable medium. It should be noted that methods disclosed herein can be implemented by a computer, e.g., a desktop computer, server, tablet computer, laptop computer, smartphone and so forth.
The present technology provides various methods for operation of ADCs in data networks such as the Internet including a plurality of switches, routers, virtual switches, web farms, host servers, and other units. The present technology provides enhanced performance and security of ADC and allows implementing scalable business solutions for any services, applications, clouds and organizations. Furthermore, the present technology provides a scalable, high-performance application networking platform, which delivers superior reliability, security, and energy efficiency at lower total cost of ownership. ADC can also provide increased infrastructure efficiency, a faster end user experience, comprehensive Layer 4-7 feature set and flexible virtualization technologies such as Virtual Chassis System, multi-tenancy, and more for public, private and hybrid cloud environments. The ADC may include software and/or hardware components/platforms that may vary depending on a particular application, performance, infrastructure, network capacity, data traffic parameters, and so forth. A more detailed explanation of an exemplary method of ADC operation is described in U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 13/791,760, filed on Mar. 8, 2013, titled “Application Delivery Controller and Global Server Load Balancer” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety including all references cited therein.
The present technology further provides various systems and methods for operation of a service on a network. It provides technology to identify viruses, botnets, trojans, malware, and other type of unauthorized services from accessing and overwhelming a host server providing the service. These systems and methods may be used to prevent a denial of service attack on a network device.
Turning now to
Still referring to
Generally speaking, load balancing is a technique that may be used for distributing the workload evenly across clients 130, networks 125, host servers 105, and other networked resources. The load balancing may enhance utilization of resources and enable maximize throughput with minimum response time, hence avoiding overloading of a single server.
A typical data packet in a TCP/IP network, may be comprised of a data component and one or more header components. The header may comprise a layer 2 header, layer 3 header, layer 4 header, or any other necessary components for transmitting the packet. The layer 2 header may comprise information such as a destination MAC address, source MAC address, and Ethernet type. The layer 3 header may be an IP header, and the layer 4 header may be a TCP header.
The IP header may comprise identifying information such as the source IP address from which the packet originated, the destination IP address for the packet, and other IP options. The IP options in the IP header may comprise information that describes the packet, directs the packet to take a particular route to reach the destination, information regarding policies for the packet, experimental fields, and any other attribute. The IP options may be defined by a type-length-value system whereby the first two bytes represent the option identification number, the next two bytes represent the length, and the remaining bytes represent the value (encoded information about the option itself).
The TCP header may comprise identifying information such as the source port from which the packet originated, the destination port for the packet, window, sequence number, ACK number, any flags (such as SYN flags), and other TCP options. Some examples of TCP options may include maximum segment size (MSS), window scale, selective ACK, timestamp, and other experimental options. The window scale may comprise a factor by which to multiply the window. Typically, the window scale may be any factor up to 15. Selective ACK messages may be used for selective retransmission of individual data packets that were not received at the destination. Timestamp may also be used to identify that the data being sent is from the same device by aligning the numerical values of the timestamp.
In certain embodiments, the ADC 115 may employ a SYN packet technique utilizing a SYN-cookie to verify that the client 130 is a trusted source and not a spoof, botnet, or any other unauthorized program. In an exemplary methodology, the client 130 may first send a SYN packet to the ADC 115, which may include a sequence number for communicating on a TCP/IP stack. The ADC 115 may then send a SYN/ACK to the client 130, comprising a SYN-cookie. The SYN-cookie may comprise a sequence number for the ADC 115, as well as an acknowledgement of the client's sequence number. The client may then respond with an acknowledgement of the SYN-cookie, thus authenticating that the client's IP address has not been spoofed. Once the client 130 has been authenticated, the ADC 115 may then forward data from the client to the host server 105.
In a stateless operating mode, the ADC 115 does not retain any information about the SYN packet until the final acknowledgement is received and the connection is established. This is to prevent a denial of service attack causing the ADC 115 to be overwhelmed with a flood of SYN packets. Furthermore, TCP options from the client 130 to the ADC 115 are typically exchanged in the first SYN packet, and the SYN/ACK, but are not exchanged again after the connection is established. Thus, the ADC 115 may encode the data from the TCP options received in the original SYN packet into the SYN-cookie that it sends with the SYN/ACK. A SYN-cookie typically contains four bytes of data, and thus TCP options such as MSS, window scale, and selective ACK may be encoded within those data bytes. When the client 130 receives the SYN/ACK with the SYN-cookie within it, the client 130 then transmits an acknowledgement back to the ADC 115 with a sequence number referring to the SYN-cookie. Thus, even though the ADC 115 does not retain the actual TCP options received in the original SYN packet while operating in a stateless mode, it may still have the relevant information necessary in the encoded SYN-cookie sequence numbers to re-compute those parameters to communicate with the host servers 105.
Since the ADC 115 is connected to a plurality of servers 105 at any given time, the ADC 115 may periodically probe the servers through a health check or any other methodology to determine which server to route the requests to. In one embodiment, the ADC 115 may probe the active servers 105 and calculate a lowest common denominator to present to the client 130. For example, if the ADC 115 probes three servers about their window scale capacity, and the servers have capacity for a window scale of five, seven, and ten, the ADC 115 may present a window scale of five to the client 130. Thus, regardless of which server the traffic is ultimately routed to, all servers will be able to handle at least that much traffic.
In exemplary embodiments, the ADC 115 may also comprise a translation layer. The translation layer may comprise information that is calculated and placed in the packet header to correlate the options in the packet header from the client with the options that the host server 105 has the capacity to serve. This is to maintain the proper protocols for communicating in the TCP/IP stack. When the ADC 115 routes a particular packet from a client 130 to a host server 105, it may adjust the values in the TCP header to match the parameters that the particular host server 105 has the capacity to serve. In this way, the protocols are aligned and communication between the network devices is streamlined. In certain embodiments, the translation layer may comprise a Layer 4 expanded SYN-cookie, Layer 3 SYN-cookie, or any other mechanism for interfacing between the header options of the client 130 and the host server 105.
To maintain the TCP connection between the client 130, ADC 115, and host servers 105, a change is needed to the host server's TCP stack. In a typical TCP/IP stack, the ADC 115 would request to connect to the host server 105 by sending it a SYN packet, and then being authenticated via a SYN-cookie, or any other such method. However, in the asymmetric mode, the ADC 115 begins communicating with the host server 105 by forwarding to it the authentication acknowledgement data packet (ACK packet) from the client such that it has all of the header options from the client 130.
Once the client 130 has been authenticated by the ADC 115, the data from the client 130 is transmitted directly to the server 105. However, the sequence numbers, TCP options, and other data in the packet from the client 130 that is forwarded directly to the server 105 contains references to data parameters that the server is not familiar with, since the authentication of the client 130 occurred prior to the data being transmitted to the server 105. Thus, in some embodiments, when the ADC 115 receives the acknowledgement from the client 130 referencing its SYN-cookie, the ADC 115 may then embed or stamp certain data onto the packet before forwarding it on to a server 105. The ADC 115 may embed data such as server sequence number, client MSS, client selective ACK, client window scale, client timestamp, or any other data found in the header, such that the processing information needed for the data packets from the client matches with the processing information needed for the packets from the server 105. In various embodiments, varying amounts of TCP option information may be embedded in the final ACK packet received from the client 130 before it is forwarded to the server 105.
In various embodiments, the ADC 115 may add TCP options to the ACK packet that it forwards to the server 105. The TCP options may include information such as window, MSS, timestamp, and so forth, or combinations thereof. The ADC 115 may accomplish this by adding one (1) TCP option for every parameter needed, or may simply use one TCP option with designated fields for each parameter. For example, the ADC 115 may designate one TCP option field of 64 bit length. The ADC 115 may use the first eight bits to represent the maximum segment size, the next 8 bits to represent the window size, etc.
When the server 105 receives the packet with the modified header information, it may recognize that the data packet and/or client 130 source has previously been authenticated by the ADC 115, and thus the server may automatically deem the data packet to be trusted and place it into the TCP stack for processing. In certain embodiments, the ADC 115 may only embed such information into the header of the initial packet forwarded to the server 105. In other embodiments, the ADC 115 may embed TCP option data into the header of all data packets it forwards to the server 105. In various embodiments, the TCP options and/or other information may be embedded onto the data packet forwarded by the ADC 115 to the server 105 through the use of an SDK that may be deployed by a network administrator for a server.
In other embodiments, the ADC 115 may add IP options to the ACK packet that it forwards from the client 130 to the server 105. The IP header of a data packet may include a fixed header and options fields. In one embodiment, the ADC 115 may use the IP options field(s) of the IP header to encode the relevant information necessary for the server 105 to communicate directly with the client 130, including the sequence numbers, timestamp, etc. The ADC 115 may accomplish this by adding one IP option for every parameter needed, or may simply use one IP option with designated fields for each parameter. For example, the ADC 115 may designate one IP option field of 64 bit length, and use eight bits to represent each of the various parameters.
In another embodiment, the ADC 115 may use the fixed header portion of an IP header. In the fixed header portion of an IP header of a data packet, there is an IP identification field. Typically, the IP identification field is two bytes in length, which allows 16 bits of encoded information. The ADC 115 may create an index table of 2^16 different combinations of parameter values, or some other appropriately sized index table. After the client 130 has been authenticated, the ADC 115 may re-compute the original parameters from the client's original SYN packet, and then pick the most appropriate parameter combination from the options in the index table. Then, the ADC 115 may encode a value associated with that entry in the index table into the IP identification field of the fixed IP header, which is then added to the data packet forwarded to the server 105.
When the server 105 receives this data packet from the ADC 115, it may receive the value from the IP identification field of the fixed IP header on the data packet, look up this value in the index table, and from there extract the proper source information, destination information, sequence numbers, timestamp, and all other relevant parameters necessary for ensuring proper data transfer over the network.
The index table that the ADC 115 uses to encode a value into the IP identification field is the same index table that the servers 105 may use to decode the value. The table may be static, such that the parameters and their associated encoded values are fixed. Alternatively, the table may be dynamic, and the ADC 115 and servers 105 may synchronize their tables periodically. In various embodiments, each network device may maintain its own local copy of the index table that is periodically synchronized. Alternatively, the index table may be maintained in a network database, or any other data structure, that is accessible to any network device from any location in the network.
In another embodiment, the processing information needed by the server 105 may directly be placed by the ADC 115 in a network database, or any other data structure, that is accessible to any network device from multiple locations in the network. In this configuration, the server 105 may look up the processing information directly, without the ADC 115 being required to make modifications to the packets it sends to the servers.
In further embodiments, the ADC 115 may transfer the relevant connection parameters from the client's SYN packet to the servers 105 through an out of band mechanism. In these embodiments, the ADC 115 may utilize one channel to authenticate itself to the servers 105 and transfer information regarding the data flow to the servers such as the sequence numbers, timestamp, window size, and any other relevant parameter necessary for efficient data transfer over the network. The ADC 115 may then utilize a separate channel to forward the actual data packets from the client 130 to the servers 105. In this way, the ADC 115 may not need to alter the ACK packet or any other data packets it receives from the client 130 before forwarding to the server 105 for processing.
In various embodiments, the ADC 115 may utilize the first channel to transmit information about the upcoming data flow to the server 105 at the beginning of each data flow, periodically throughout the data flow, and/or at the end of the data flow.
In other embodiments, the ADC 115 may utilize IP tunneling to transfer the relevant information necessary to the servers 105 about the data. In these embodiments, the ADC 115 may not need to edit the ACK packet received from the client 130 before forwarding it to the server 105. The ADC 115 may instead utilize a module to place the ACK packet in another packet with an IP header that contains the relevant parameters, and then send this modified packet to the servers 105. When the server 105 receives the modified packet, it may extract from the modified packet's IP header the sequence number for the connection, timestamp, and all other relevant parameters necessary for proper data flow between the server 105 and the client 130. In various embodiments, the ADC 115 may utilize a tunnel header to communicate the relevant parameters. The ADC 115 may use a module to encapsulate the ACK packet from the client with data representing the relevant parameters. When the server 105 receives the modified packet, it may use a module to extract the outer header with the relevant parameters such that when it sends response data back to the client 130, it may do so with the proper sequence numbers, timestamp, window, and/or other parameters to communicate over the network protocol.
While the above methods have been described generally with a first packet being received by the server from the ADC as being the ACK packet that includes processing information (that is, information that is needed by the server for communicating with the client), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the first packet received by the server from the ADC may not be the ACK packet, but could also be another SYN packet or some other packet in which the necessary processing information is embedded or otherwise communicated.
In furtherance of this goal, the method also further includes the ADC embedding 310 in the data packet a transmission control protocol (TCP) options header. In some embodiments the TCP options header comprises information including at least a sequence number for a protocol connection. The TCP options header can also include connection parameters, which include parameters that are necessary for efficient data transfer over the secure network. For example, a maximum segment size, a window scale, and a selective acknowledgement message, as well as other parameters that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art with the present disclosure before them.
The method includes the ADC forwarding 315 the embedded data packet to a server, as well as establishing 320 a network connection between the client and the server.
While the example of
Next, the method includes the ADC modifying 410 an Internet protocol (IP) header of the data packet with an encoded value from an index table. As with the method above, the encoded value may include a fixed header and options fields. The modification may include encoding parameters such as source information, destination information, sequence numbers, timestamp, as well as other network protocol parameters that would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Once the IP header of the client's packet has been modified, the method includes forwarding 415 the data packet with the modified IP header to a server.
Optionally, the method may include determining 420 the network capabilities of the server and adjusting 425 the parameters included in the IP header such that the IP header parameters correlate to the server's capabilities. For example, if the IP header information includes protocol parameters that cannot be serviced by the server, the ADC can determine the capabilities of the server and adjust the parameters received from the client to ensure that the client and server are able to communicate with one another over the network in a secure manner.
As mentioned above, the ADC may also be configured to use IP tunneling as part of the in-band/out-of-band methodology.
The components shown in
Mass storage device 30, which may be implemented with a magnetic disk drive or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor 10. Mass storage device 30 can store the system software for implementing embodiments of the present technology for purposes of loading that software into main memory 20.
Portable storage device 40 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a floppy disk, compact disk or digital video disc, to input and output data and code to and from the computing system 1 of
Input devices 60 provide a portion of a user interface. Input devices 60 may include an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alphanumeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys, or a scanner for reading bar codes. Additionally, the system 1 as shown in
Display system 70 may include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Display system 70 receives textual and graphical information, and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripherals 80 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computing system. Peripherals 80 may include a modem or a router.
The components contained in the computing system 1 of
Some of the above-described functions may be composed of instructions that are stored on storage media (e.g., computer-readable medium). The instructions may be retrieved and executed by the processor. Some examples of storage media are memory devices, tapes, disks, and the like. The instructions are operational when executed by the processor to direct the processor to operate in accord with the technology. Those skilled in the art are familiar with instructions, processor(s), and storage media.
It is noteworthy that any hardware platform suitable for performing the processing described herein is suitable for use with the technology. The terms “computer-readable storage medium” and “computer-readable storage media” as used herein refer to any medium or media that participate in providing instructions to a CPU for execution. Such media can take many forms, including, but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media and transmission media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as a fixed disk. Volatile media include dynamic memory, such as system RAM. Transmission media include coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, among others, including the wires that comprise one embodiment of a bus. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM disk, digital video disk (DVD), any other optical medium, any other physical medium with patterns of marks or holes, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, an EEPROM, a FLASHEPROM, any other memory chip or data exchange adapter, a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Various forms of computer-readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to a CPU for execution. A bus carries the data to system RAM, from which a CPU retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by system RAM can optionally be stored on a fixed disk either before or after execution by a CPU.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present technology may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, PHP, MySQL, HTML, Java Script, CSS, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present technology has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present technology and its practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Aspects of the present technology are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
While the present invention has been described in connection with a series of preferred embodiment, these descriptions are not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms set forth herein. It will be further understood that the methods of the invention are not necessarily limited to the discrete steps or the order of the steps described. To the contrary, the present descriptions are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and otherwise appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/268,914, filed May 2, 2014, title “Facilitating Secure Network Traffic by an Application Delivery Controller” which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/819,417, filed May 3, 2013, titled “Facilitating Secure Network Traffic by an Application Delivery Controller”. This application is also related to co-pending U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 14/261,322, filed Apr. 24, 2014 and titled “Systems and Methods for Network Access Control,” and to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/791,760 titled “Application Delivery Controller and Global Server Load Balancer” filed on Mar. 8, 2013. All of the disclosures of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties, including all references cited therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4403286 | Fry et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4495570 | Kitajima et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4577272 | Ballew et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4720850 | Oberlander et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4864492 | Blakely-Fogel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4882699 | Evensen | Nov 1989 | A |
5031089 | Liu et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5218602 | Grant et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5218676 | Ben-Ayed et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5293488 | Riley et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5341477 | Pitkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5432908 | Heddes et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5537542 | Eilert et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5563878 | Blakeley et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5603029 | Aman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5675739 | Eilert et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5740371 | Wallis | Apr 1998 | A |
5751971 | Dobbins et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754752 | Sheh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774668 | Choquier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796936 | Watabe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812771 | Fee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828847 | Gehr et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835724 | Smith | Nov 1998 | A |
5867636 | Walker | Feb 1999 | A |
5867661 | Bittinger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875296 | Shi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5917997 | Bell et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918017 | Attanasio et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923854 | Bell et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931914 | Chiu | Aug 1999 | A |
5935207 | Logue et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935215 | Bell et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941988 | Bhagwat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944794 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946686 | Schmuck et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951650 | Bell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951694 | Choquier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958053 | Denker | Sep 1999 | A |
5995981 | Wikstrom | Nov 1999 | A |
6003069 | Cavill | Dec 1999 | A |
6006264 | Colby et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006269 | Phaal | Dec 1999 | A |
6031978 | Cotner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041357 | Kunzelman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047268 | Bartoli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6076108 | Courts et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088728 | Bellemore et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098093 | Bayeh et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104717 | Coile et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119174 | Borowsky et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128279 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131163 | Wiegel | Oct 2000 | A |
6141759 | Braddy | Oct 2000 | A |
6185598 | Farber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219706 | Fan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223205 | Harchol-Balter et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223287 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247057 | Barrera, III | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249820 | Dobbins et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252878 | Locklear, Jr. et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259705 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262976 | McNamara | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286039 | Van Horne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314463 | Abbott et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317786 | Yamane et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321338 | Porras et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324177 | Howes et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330560 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339423 | Sampson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353614 | Borella et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363075 | Huang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363081 | Gase | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374300 | Masters | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374359 | Shrader et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381632 | Lowell | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393475 | Leong et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397261 | Eldridge et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6430622 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445704 | Howes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446225 | Robsman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459682 | Ellesson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6490682 | Vanstone et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496866 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510464 | Grantges, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515988 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542926 | Zalewski et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6564215 | Hsiao et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567857 | Gupta et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578066 | Logan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587866 | Modi et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591262 | MacLellan et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594268 | Aukia et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598167 | Devine et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606315 | Albert et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609150 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611498 | Baker et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6650641 | Albert et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657974 | Britton et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697354 | Borella et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701377 | Burmann et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704317 | Dobson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711618 | Danner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714979 | Brandt et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718383 | Hebert | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742126 | Mann et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745229 | Gobin et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748413 | Bournas | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748414 | Bournas | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760758 | Lund et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763370 | Schmeidler et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763468 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6772333 | Brendel | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6772334 | Glawitsch | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779017 | Lamberton et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6779033 | Watson et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6877095 | Allen | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6886044 | Miles et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6892307 | Wood et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6941384 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952728 | Alles et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6954784 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963917 | Callis et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965930 | Arrowood et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6996617 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6996631 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010605 | Dharmarajan | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7013482 | Krumel | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7058600 | Combar et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058718 | Fontes et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7058789 | Henderson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069438 | Balabine et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076555 | Orman et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7120697 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143087 | Fairweather | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167927 | Philbrick et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181524 | Lele | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188181 | Squier et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7218722 | Turner et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7225249 | Barry et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7228359 | Monteiro | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7234161 | Maufer et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7236457 | Joe | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7254133 | Govindarajan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269850 | Govindarajan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277963 | Dolson et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7301899 | Goldstone | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308499 | Chavez | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310686 | Uysal | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328267 | Bashyam et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7334232 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337241 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343399 | Hayball et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349970 | Clement et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7370353 | Yang | May 2008 | B2 |
7391725 | Huitema et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398317 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7423977 | Joshi | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7430611 | Aiken, Jr. et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430755 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7463648 | Eppstein et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7467202 | Savchuk | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472190 | Robinson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7492766 | Cabeca et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506360 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7509369 | Tormasov | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7512980 | Copeland et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7533409 | Keane et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7552323 | Shay | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7584262 | Wang et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7584301 | Joshi | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7590736 | Hydrie et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7613193 | Swami et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7613822 | Joy et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7673072 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7675854 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703102 | Eppstein et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7707295 | Szeto et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7711790 | Barrett et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7747748 | Allen | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7765328 | Bryers et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792113 | Foschiano et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7808994 | Vinokour et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7826487 | Mukerji et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7881215 | Daigle et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7948952 | Hurtta et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7970934 | Patel | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7979585 | Chen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983258 | Ruben et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7990847 | Leroy et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
7991859 | Miller et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8019870 | Eppstein et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8032634 | Eppstein et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8090866 | Bashyam et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8122116 | Matsunaga et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8179809 | Eppstein et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8185651 | Moran et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8191106 | Choyi et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8224971 | Miller et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8234650 | Eppstein et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8239445 | Gage et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8255644 | Sonnier et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266235 | Jalan et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8296434 | Miller et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8312507 | Chen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8379515 | Mukerji | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8499093 | Grosser et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8539075 | Bali et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8554929 | Szeto et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8560693 | Wang et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8584199 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8595791 | Chen et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
RE44701 | Chen et al. | Jan 2014 | E |
8675488 | Sidebottom et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8681610 | Mukerji | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8750164 | Casado et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782221 | Han | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8813180 | Chen et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8826372 | Chen et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8879427 | Krumel | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885463 | Medved et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8897154 | Jalan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8965957 | Barros | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8977749 | Han | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8990262 | Chen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9094364 | Jalan et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9106561 | Jalan et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118618 | Davis | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118620 | Davis | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9154577 | Jalan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9154584 | Han | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9215275 | Kannan et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9219751 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9253152 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9270705 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9270774 | Jalan et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9338225 | Jalan et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9350744 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9356910 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9386088 | Zheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9497201 | Chen et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9531846 | Han et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9544364 | Jalan et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9602442 | Han | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9609052 | Jalan et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9661026 | Chen et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9705800 | Sankar et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9742879 | Davis | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9843484 | Sankar et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9900252 | Chiong | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9906422 | Jalan et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9906591 | Jalan et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20010015812 | Sugaya | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049741 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010783 | Primak et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032777 | Kawata et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020078164 | Reinschmidt | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091831 | Johnson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091844 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103916 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124089 | Aiken et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133491 | Sim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138618 | Szabo | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141448 | Matsunaga | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143953 | Aiken | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143954 | Aiken et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143991 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166080 | Attanasio et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178259 | Doyle et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178265 | Aiken et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178268 | Aiken et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191575 | Kalavade | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194335 | Maynard | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194350 | Lu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199000 | Banerjee | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009591 | Hayball et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014544 | Pettey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023711 | Parmar et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023873 | Ben-Itzhak | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031180 | Datta et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035409 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035420 | Niu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030061402 | Yadav | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030079146 | Burstein | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081624 | Aggarwal et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091028 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030131245 | Linderman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135625 | Fontes et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152078 | Henderson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030195962 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202536 | Foster et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040001497 | Sharma | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040062246 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073703 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078419 | Ferrari et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078480 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111516 | Cain | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128312 | Shalabi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139057 | Hirata et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139108 | Tang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141005 | Banatwala et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143599 | Shalabi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040184442 | Jones et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040187032 | Gels et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199616 | Karhu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199646 | Susai et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202182 | Lund et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210623 | Hydrie et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210663 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213158 | Collett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040253956 | Collins | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268358 | Darling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005207 | Herneque | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050009520 | Herrero et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021848 | Jorgenson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021949 | Izawa et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027862 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036501 | Chung et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036511 | Baratakke et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044270 | Grove et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050074013 | Hershey et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080890 | Yang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102400 | Nakahara et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125276 | Rusu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141506 | Aiken et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163073 | Heller et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198335 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213586 | Cyganski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240989 | Kim et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249225 | Singhal | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259586 | Hafid et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060023721 | Miyake et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036610 | Wang | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036733 | Fujimoto et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064478 | Sirkin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069774 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069804 | Miyake | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077926 | Rune | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092950 | Arregoces et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098645 | Walkin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112170 | Sirkin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060168319 | Trossen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187901 | Cortes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190997 | Mahajani et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209789 | Gupta | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233100 | Luft et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251057 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277303 | Hegde et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280121 | Matoba | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019543 | Wei et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070086382 | Narayanan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094396 | Takano et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118881 | Mitchell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156919 | Potti et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165622 | O'Rourke et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185998 | Touitou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230337 | Igarashi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245090 | King et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259673 | Willars et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274285 | Werber et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283429 | Chen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286077 | Wu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288247 | Mackay | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294209 | Strub et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080031263 | Ervin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080101396 | Miyata | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109452 | Patterson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109870 | Sherlock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134332 | Keohane et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162679 | Maher | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181213 | Ovsiannikov | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228781 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250099 | Shen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263209 | Pisharody et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271130 | Ramamoorthy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282254 | Blander et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291911 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080320151 | McCanne et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037361 | Prathaban et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049198 | Blinn et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070470 | Bauman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077651 | Poeluev | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092124 | Singhal et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106830 | Maher | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138606 | Moran et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138945 | Savchuk | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141634 | Rothstein et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164614 | Christian et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090172093 | Matsubara | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213858 | Dolganow et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222583 | Josefsberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090227228 | Hu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228547 | Miyaoka et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090262741 | Jungck | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271472 | Scheifler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090313379 | Rydnell | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008229 | Bi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023621 | Ezolt et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036952 | Hazlewood et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054139 | Chun et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061319 | Aso et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064008 | Yan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082787 | Kommula et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083076 | Ushiyama | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094985 | Abu-Samaha et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098417 | Tse-Au | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106833 | Banerjee et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106854 | Kim et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100128606 | Patel et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100162378 | Jayawardena et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100188975 | Raleigh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210265 | Borzsei et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217793 | Preiss | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223630 | Degenkolb et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228819 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235507 | Szeto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235522 | Chen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238828 | Russell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265824 | Chao et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268814 | Cross et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293296 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312740 | Clemm et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318631 | Shukla | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322252 | Suganthi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330971 | Selitser et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333101 | Pope et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007652 | Bai | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013525 | Breslau et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019550 | Bryers et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110023071 | Li et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029599 | Pulleyn et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032941 | Quach et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040826 | Chadzelek et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047294 | Singh et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110060831 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064083 | Borkenhagen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093522 | Chen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099403 | Miyata et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110294 | Valluri et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131646 | Park et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145324 | Reinart et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153834 | Bharrat | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178985 | San Martin Arribas et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185073 | Jagadeeswaran et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191442 | Ovsiannikov | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191773 | Pavel et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196971 | Reguraman et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110276695 | Maldaner | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276982 | Nakayama et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289496 | Steer | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292939 | Subramaian et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302256 | Sureshehandra et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307541 | Walsh et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008495 | Shen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023231 | Ueno | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026897 | Guichard et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120030341 | Jensen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120066371 | Patel et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084460 | McGinnity et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106355 | Ludwig | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117571 | Davis et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144014 | Natham et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120151353 | Joanny | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155495 | Clee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170548 | Rajagopalan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173759 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191839 | Maynard | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120239792 | Banerjee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240185 | Kapoor et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120290727 | Tivig | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297046 | Raja et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130007225 | Gage et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046876 | Narayana et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058335 | Koponen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130074177 | Varadhan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083725 | Mallya et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130089099 | Pollock et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091273 | Ly et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130124713 | Feinberg et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148500 | Sonoda et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166731 | Yamanaka et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173795 | McPherson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130176854 | Chisu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191486 | Someya et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191548 | Boddukuri et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198385 | Han et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250765 | Ehsan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258846 | Damola | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282791 | Kruglick | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311686 | Fetterman et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140047115 | Lipscomb et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140258465 | Li | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269728 | Jalan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286313 | Fu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298091 | Carlen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330977 | van Bemmel | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330982 | Jalan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140334485 | Jain et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359052 | Joachimpillai et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150085650 | Cui et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150156223 | Xu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150215436 | Kancherla | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150237173 | Virkki et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150281087 | Jalan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281104 | Golshan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150296058 | Jalan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312268 | Ray | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150350048 | Sampat et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150350379 | Jalan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381465 | Narayanan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160042014 | Jalan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160044095 | Sankar et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160088074 | Kannan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160139910 | Ramanathan et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160261642 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1372662 | Oct 2002 | CN |
1449618 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1473300 | Feb 2004 | CN |
1529460 | Sep 2004 | CN |
1575582 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1714545 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1725702 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1910869 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101004740 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101094225 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101163336 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101169785 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101189598 | May 2008 | CN |
101193089 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101247349 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101261644 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101495993 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101567818 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101878663 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102104548 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102143075 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102546590 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102571742 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102577252 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102918801 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103365654 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103533018 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103944954 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104040990 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104067569 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104106241 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104137491 | Nov 2014 | CN |
104796396 | Jul 2015 | CN |
102577252 | Mar 2016 | CN |
102918801 | May 2016 | CN |
0648038 | Apr 1995 | EP |
1209876 | May 2002 | EP |
1770915 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1885096 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2296313 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2577910 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2622795 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2647174 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2760170 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2772026 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2901308 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2760170 | Dec 2015 | EP |
1182560 | Nov 2013 | HK |
1183569 | Dec 2013 | HK |
1183996 | Jan 2014 | HK |
1189438 | Jan 2014 | HK |
1188498 | May 2014 | HK |
1198565 | May 2015 | HK |
1198848 | Jun 2015 | HK |
1199153 | Jun 2015 | HK |
1199779 | Jul 2015 | HK |
1200617 | Aug 2015 | HK |
IN3764CHN2014 | Sep 2015 | IN |
H0997233 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H1196128 | Apr 1999 | JP |
H11338836 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000276432 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000307634 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001051859 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001298449 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002091936 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2003141068 | May 2003 | JP |
2003186776 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2005141441 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006332825 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2008040718 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009500731 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2013528330 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2014504484 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2014143686 | Aug 2014 | JP |
2015507380 | Mar 2015 | JP |
5855663 | Feb 2016 | JP |
5906263 | Apr 2016 | JP |
5913609 | Apr 2016 | JP |
5946189 | Jul 2016 | JP |
100830413 | May 2008 | KR |
20130096624 | Aug 2013 | KR |
101576585 | Dec 2015 | KR |
WO2001013228 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO2001014990 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO2001045349 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2003103237 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004084085 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2006098033 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO2008053954 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008078593 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2011049770 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011079381 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2011149796 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2012050747 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012075237 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012083264 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012097015 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO2013070391 | May 2013 | WO |
WO2013081952 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013096019 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO2013112492 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO2014031046 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO2014052099 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO2014088741 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO2014093829 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO2014138483 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014144837 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2014179753 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO2015153020 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abe, et al., “Adaptive Split Connection Schemes in Advanced Relay Nodes,” IEICE Technical Report, 2010, vol. 109 (438), pp. 25-30. |
ACEdirector: 8-Port 10/100 MBPS Ethernet Web Switch, Alteon WebSystems, 1999, <http://www.andovercg.com/datasheets/alteon-ad3-act4.pdf>, pp. 2. |
Allot Communications Announces Business-Aware Network Policy Manager, Allot Communications, Sophia Antipolis, France, 1999, pp. 2. |
Allot Communications Announces Directory Services Based Network Policy Manager, Allot Communications, Los Galos, California, 1999, pp. 2. |
Allot Announces the General Availability of its Directroy Services-Based NetPolicy Manager, Allot Communications, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2000, pp. 2. |
Allot Introduces Turnkey Next Generation IP Service and Creation Solution—The Virtual Bandwidth Manager, Allot Communications, SUPERCOMM, 2000, 2 pgs. |
Allot Communications Launches NetEnforcer with Netwizard, the Fastest Way to Implement Accurate and Reliable Network QoS Policies, Allot Communications, 2001, 2 pgs. |
Allot Communications Announces the NetEnforcer Family of IP Traffic Management Products: Fault-Tolerant, Scaleable, Policy-Based Bandwidth Management, QoS, SLA Solutions, Allot Communications, 1999, 2 pgs. |
Allot Communications Policy-Based Network Architecture, Allot Communications, 2001, pp. 1-12. |
Apostolopoulos, et al., “Design, Implementation and Performance of a Content-Based Switch,” INFOCOM, Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings, 2000, vol. 3, pp. 1117-1126. |
Aron, et al., “Efficient Support for P-HTTP in Cluster-Based Web Servers,” Proceedings of the Annual Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 1999, pp. 14. |
Aron, “Scalable Content-Aware Request Distribution in Cluster-Based Network Servers,” Department of Computer Science, Rice University, [online retreived Mar. 13, 2001], <URL:http://softlib.rice.edu/scalableRD.html>, pp. 8. |
Aron, et al., “Scalable Content-Aware Request Distribution in Cluster-Based Networks Servers,” Proceedings of the Annual Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 2000, pp. 15. |
Cardellini, et al., “Dynamic Load Balancing on Web-Server Systems,” IEEE Internet Computing, 1999, vol. 3 (3), pp. 28-39. |
Dahlin, et al., “EDDIE: A Robust and Scalable Internet Server,” 1998, http://www.eddie.org/, pp. 1-7 (Copy Unavailable). |
Data Communications Awards Allot Communications “Hot Product” in Internetworking / IP Tools Catergory, Allot Communications, 1999, 2 pgs. |
1.3.20 DEVICE and LINK Statement—Virtual Devices (VIPA), IP Configuration, IBM BookManager BookServer, 1998, <http://w3.enterlib.ibm.com:80/cgi-bin/bookmgr/books/F1AF7001/1.3.2>, pp. 3. |
Devine, “TCP/IP Application Availability and Workload Balancing in the Parallel Sysplex,” SHARE Technical Conference, 1999, pp. 17. |
Enhancing Web User Experience with Global Server Load Balancing, Alteon WebSystems, 1999, pp. 8. |
FreeBSD, “tcp—TCP Protocal,” Linux Programme□ s Manual [online], 2007, [retrieved on Apr. 13, 2016], Retreived from the Internet: <https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=tcp&apropos=0&sektion=7&manpath=SuSe+Linux%2Fi386+11.0&format=asci>. |
Gite, “Linux Tune Network Stack (Buffers Size) to Increase Networking Performance,” nixCraft [online], 2009, [retreived on Apr. 13, 2016], Retreived from the Internet <URL:http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/linux-tcp-tuning/>. |
Goldszmidt, et al., “NetDispatcher: A TCP Connection Router,” IBM Researc Report, RC 20853, 1997, pp. 1-31. |
1.3.23 HOME Statement, IP Configuration, IBM BookManager BookServer, 1998, <http://w3.enterlib.com:80/cgi-bin/bookmgr/books/F1AF7001/1.3.2>, pp. 6. |
Kjaer, et al., “Resource Allocation and Disturbance Rejection in Web Servers Using SLAs and Virtualized Servers,” IEEE Transactions on Network Service Management, 2009, vol. 6 (4), pp. 226-239. |
Koike, et al., “Transport Middleware for Network-Based Control,” IEICE Technical Report, 2000, vol. 100 (53), pp. 13-18. |
Noguchi, “Realizing the Highest Level “Layer 7” Switch”= Totally Managing Network Resources, Applications, and Users =, Computer & Network LAN, 2000, vol. 18 (1), pp. 109-112. |
Ohnuma, “AppSwitch: 7th Layer Switch Provided with Full Setup and Report Tools,” Interop Magazine, 2000, vol. 10 (6), pp. 148-150. |
Pai, et al., “Locality-Aware Request Distribution in Cluster-Based Network Servers,” ASPLOS VIII Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 1998, pp. 205-216. |
Samar, “Single Sign-On Using Cookies for Web Applications,” IEEE WETICE, 1999, pp. 158-163. |
Sharifian, et al., “An Approximation-Based Load-Balancing Algorithm with Admission Control for Cluster Web Servers with Dynamic Workloads,” The Journal of Supercomputing, 2010, vol. 53 (3), pp. 440-463. |
Spatscheck, et al., “Optimizing TCP Forwarder Performance,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2000, vol. 8 (2), pp. 146-157. |
Takahashi, “The Fundamentals of the Windows Network: Understanding the Mystery of the Windows Network from the Basics,” Network Magazine, 2006, vol. 11 (7), pp. 32-35. |
The Next Step in Server Load Balancing, Alteon WebSystems, 1999, pp. 16. |
1.3.1.2.5 Virtual IP Addressing (VIPA), IP Configuration, IBM BookManager BookServer, 1998, <http://w3.enterlib.ibm.com:80/cgi-bin/boolmgr/books/F1AF7001/1.3.2>, pp. 4. |
Yamamoto, et al., “Performance Evaluation of Window Size in Proxy-Based TCP for Multi-Hop Wireless Networks,” IPSJ SIG Technical Reports, 2008, vol. 2008 (44), pp. 109-114. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180124052 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61819417 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14268914 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15858382 | US |