Patent Application
20160053574
Safety valves are ubiquitous in the downhole industry. Consequently, control systems number aplenty as well. In each case, the primary concern is that in the event of a failure of any part of the control system, the valve will either remain in or automatically proceed to a “safe” position. This may be open or closed depending upon the particular configuration.
Regardless of the number of presently available systems however, the art is generally receptive to alternative configurations with differing attributes and enhanced capabilities.
A control system for a Subsurface Safety Valve (SSSV), includes An actuating piston mounted in a housing with at least one seal and connected to the SSSV, the actuating piston having a first end and a second end, the first end in fluid communication with a control line; a primary pressure reservoir in fluid communication with the second end of the actuating piston, the reservoir configured to contain a fluid under an amount of pressure selected to act against a prospective hydrostatic pressure expected in the control line based upon the selected position of the control system in a downhole environment; an equalizing piston in fluid communication with both the control line and with the second end of the actuating piston, the equalizing piston remaining in a closed position during shifting of the actuating piston with pressure applied or removed from the control line, the equalizing piston movable to an open position upon a control system failure that reduces pressure in the primary reservoir to below a threshold value; and a condition sensing and chemical injection assembly in fluid communication with the primary reservoir.
A method for operating a control system for a Subsurface Safety Valve (SSSV) includes raising pressure in the control line in the system of claim 1 to a selected maximum working pressure; holding the maximum working pressure in the line and monitoring for pressure fall off; concluding that 1) the control system is operational if pressure is maintained for a selected period of time or that 2) the control system is not operational if pressure is not maintained for the selected period of time.
The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:
The control system C is illustrated in
A pressurized primary reservoir 38 contains a pressurized gas, preferably an inert gas such as nitrogen, above a level of hydraulic fluid 40 which communicates through a conduit 42 in turn to conduits 44 and 46. Conduit 44 allows the fluid 40 to exert a force against surface 30 of piston 10. The pressure in conduit 44 is communicated through passageway 32 to the area between seals 26 and 36. However, the pressure thus communicated through passageway 32 does not act to operate piston 10 during normal operations. In essence, passageway 32 constitutes a pressure leak path to ensure that the control system C puts the SSSV in a closed position if a failure occurs at seal 36.
A secondary reservoir 48 communicates with a surface 50 of an equalizing piston 52. A seal 54 isolates secondary reservoir 48 from conduit 20 in the position shown in
The normal operation to open the SSSV using the control system C requires nothing more than applying pressure in the control line 16. It should be noted that the pressure in the primary reservoir 38 is above the hydrostatic pressure in the control line 16 from the hydraulic fluid therein in order to counteract the force presented thereby. In one embodiment, and arbitrarily, the value of the pressure in the primary reservoir 38 can be 500 psi above the anticipated hydrostatic pressure in the control line 16 at the depth at which the SSSV will be installed. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the charges of pressure in primary reservoir 38, as well as secondary reservoir 48, need to be determined at the surface before the SSSV is installed. The pressure in the secondary reservoir 48 is to be below the prescribed pressure in the primary reservoir. In one embodiment and selected for convenience, the pressure used in the secondary reservoir 48 is 50 psi less than the anticipated control line hydrostatic pressure. The purpose of the primary reservoir 38 is to offset the hydrostatic force on piston 10 from control line 16. Piston 52 is normally under a pressure imbalance which is caused by the pressure difference between reservoirs 38 and 48. The hydrostatic or applied pressure in conduit 20 has no net force impact on piston 52.
Finally the reader's attention is directed to the bottom left corner of the figures where a condition sensing and chemical injection assembly 70 is illustrated. The assembly will be available for use at any time for condition sensing and under certain failure conditions of the control system C, for chemical injection repurposing of the control system C. The assembly 70 is to be positioned within the control system C to fluidly communicate between the primary reservoir 38 and the tubing components of the SSSV outside of the control system itself. The assembly comprises one or more burst disks 72, a one-way check valve 74 and an atmospheric chamber 76 between the one or more burst disks and the check valve. It is to be noted that in some embodiments atmospheric pressure may also be maintained between any two or more burst disks as well as between the burst disk nearest the check valve and the check valve itself. The check valve 74 comprises a spring 78 and a poppet head 80 that will seat in a seat 82 under influence of the spring 78 when control line pressure is not exceeding the spring force of spring 78 plus tubing pressure, to which the poppet head 80 is exposed at a side opposite the control line 16. The check valve 74 is openable based upon control line pressure being above the spring force plus tubing pressure (after the one or more burst disks have burst). The check valve 74 will reseat upon a control line pressure below tubing pressure and spring force.
It is to be understood that one burst disk 72 is sufficient for functionality of the assembly 70 but more than one will also work well and may provide for additional reliability in function. The atmospheric chamber 76 is important to ensure that the burst disk(s) burst ratings will be closely related to actual pressure differential numbers in situ. Were it not for the atmospheric chamber 76, the rating of the burst disk(s) would be subject to the variability of the tubing pressure (which very well might be above the control line maximum working pressure). With the atmospheric chamber 76, burst disks 72 may be rated to burst at the maximum working pressure of the control line, which rating will be close to constant. The bursting of the one or more burst disks will itself provide one of the condition indicators that is a benefit of the invention. More specifically, with the burst disk(s) rupturing at the maximum working pressure of the control line, a condition sensing function is realized. This will be better understood in the discussion hereunder.
The principal components of the control system having been described, its normal operation will now be reviewed. In order to actuate the SSSV from the closed position shown in
The closure of the SSSV occurs normally through a reversal of the procedure outlined above. The pressure in the control line 16 is reduced. When the pressure is sufficiently reduced, a net unbalanced upward force occurs on piston 10 due to the pressure in primary reservoir 38 acting on surface 30. This force, in combination with the force of spring 14, becomes greater than the hydrostatic force from the fluid column in the control line 16, thus allowing the piston 10 to move back upwardly to its position shown in
Potential problems can occur in the control system when the SSSV is in the closed position shown in
With more particular relevance to the present disclosure, the assembly 70 provides for two distinct benefits in the control system C as described above or in other control systems as well. Application of the disclosure below to other control systems will be understood by those of skill in the art following a thorough reading of the description below with reference to the figures. The benefits, as noted above are, 1) a condition sensing capability and 2) a chemical injection capability. The condition sensing capability employs maximum working pressure on the control line. The actual pressure can be whatever the design pressure of the control line 16 is since actual pressure is immaterial to the functionality of the configuration. The one or more burst disks 72 however will be rated to burst at substantially the same pressure as maximum working pressure of the control line 16. When an operator desires to check the condition of the SSSV and the control system C, pressure is raised within the control line to the maximum working pressure of the control line 16. If pressure can be maintained at maximum working pressure for a selected period of time, for example a few minutes, then the Control system C is functional. This is known from this exercise because if the pressure is maintainable, the control system has not communicated the control line to the primary reservoir portion of the system. Without this communication, control line pressure does not reach the one or more burst disks and hence cannot rupture the one or more burst disks. This provides a simple and rapid confirmation that the control system is still in working order. Conversely, if the system has indeed tripped meaning that control line pressure is communicated to the primary reservoir portion of the system, the one or more burst disks 72 will rupture at the control line maximum working pressure level. More specifically, in order for the one or more burst disks 72 to rupture, control line pressure must already have been communicated to the burst disk, which indicates a “tripped control system”, a failure mode that results in control line pressure at both ends of the piston 10 so that spring 14 will close the SSSV. This condition is fully described in the above incorporated patent. If the system is tripped then raising control line pressure to maximum working pressure will result in the pressure at the one or more bursts disks being at the same maximum working pressure. If, as noted is the case, the one or more burst disks are rated to rupture at the maximum working pressure of the control line, they will rupture when pressure reaches that value. Once the one or more disks rupture, pressure in the control line will begin to fall. In this situation, it will not be possible to maintain the maximum pressure for the prescribed period of time, thereby providing the operator with a positive indication that the control system C has tripped. In the event that the above described testing for condition has been undertaken in relation to an SSSV not moving scenario, the operator can be confident that either the valve is physically stuck with scale, paraffin, etc. or the control system has tripped. If the valve is physically stuck, interventions would then be indicated to exercise the SSSV. If the system is tripped however, different actions would be indicated. In one desirable iteration, the control system as described is duplicated in an entirely redundant secondary control system and accordingly upon a confirmation of a tripped control system, the secondary control system would be used to attempt actuation of the SSSV without the need for a separate run of tools to exercise the SSSV. The configuration as described avoids separate runs to determine the cause of a valve not moving condition, reducing the total number of interventional activities to those situations where they are actually needed.
Another aspect of the invention described herein is the repurposing of the control system C to be used as a chemical injection system if indeed the test described above identifies a tripped condition (a control system failure). Heretofore, a control system failure simply meant that the control system had no continuing utility for the operator and a backup system would be utilized. Configured as taught herein however, the control system may be further operated as a chemical injection system. Moreover, the chemicals injected by the system will be placed more advantageously than prior art methods. In particular, where a tripped condition has occurred and the one or more burst disks have burst as described above, the hydraulic fluid from the control system will leak into areas surrounding the components of the SSSV behind the flow tube (locations will be understandable to one of skill in the art). Because the control system has the ability to supply fluid to that location through the burst disks and check valve 74 greater chemical action of a chemical injection fluid would be realized. In particular, the control line fluid is swapped out for chemical injection fluid. Normally this would be done by simply pushing the control fluid past the check valve and continuing to pump fluid until a sufficient amount of the chemical injection fluid has reached the SSSV. The configuration as such, renders a heretofore useless system (having been tripped) a newly useful system in a repurposed way. Because of the location of the supply of chemical injection fluid as noted above, the result is even better than prior art such as chemical injection fluid run on a tubing string of some kind since the injection fluid goes directly to the components of the valve that will most benefit from its presence.
Referring to
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
