a. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a fall arrest block for use by a workman working above the ground. The block will be connected to a secure fixed point, and a lifeline wound on the block is connected to a harness worn by the workman, with the lifeline winding up and unwinding under spring control whilst the workman moves around, but locking up and providing a soft landing if the workman falls.
b. Related Art
In the event of a fall, fall arrest blocks conventionally work by switching in a friction brake which slows down the rate at which the lifeline is unwound from a drum, whilst absorbing energy in doing so.
One prior art fall arrest block is disclosed in US patent document 2005/269153 A1. This discloses a fall arrest block that uses a section of lifeline formed from two lengths of line sewn together. If a worker falls, the fall is broken by the ripping apart of these two lengths, which helps to dissipate energy.
One concern with this arrangement is that if the fall is severe enough, the full length of the sewn sections will be torn apart. Although there is a fixed length lifeline in parallel with the torn sections having a length longer than that of the sewn sections when torn apart, a problem arises in that the energy absorbing function ceases as the two sewn sections become fully separated. This document therefore proposes the use of a third section in parallel in the form of an elastic section. This adds to the complexity and bulk of the fall arrest block.
It is therefore an objection of the invention provide a fall arrest block that is compact, both in terms of the lifeline spooling mechanism, as well as with the energy absorbing feature used to controllably arrest the fall of a worker secured to the fall arrest block.
According to the present invention, there is provided a fall arrest block having a lifeline wound on a rotatable spindle and connected between the spindle and a harness attachment point, wherein in the event of a fall, the spindle rotation is locked and kinetic energy of the fall is absorbed by a stretchable and non-elastic energy absorbing section of the lifeline between the spindle and the harness attachment point such that, in use, said energy absorbing section stretches as the energy is absorbed.
Preferably the spindle rotation is locked by an inertia mechanism.
Such a block is particularly suitable for workmen working at a relatively short distance above the ground, as the spindle will lock up instantly, and a falling workman will be halted before reaching the ground. For example, the lifeline may have a maximum length of 3 meters.
The inertia mechanism preferably comprises an inertia weight positioned around the shaft of the spindle, with movement of the weight in a radial direction causing a pawl to engage with a component which in turn introduces a locking arm into a position where it locks the rotation of the spindle. The spindle may be unitary with a toothed ratchet wheel with the locking arm being arranged to engage with the ratchet wheel.
The energy absorbing section of the lifeline may comprises a length of stretchable but non-elastic energy absorbing webbing joined at two points along the length of the lifeline, which is itself substantially non-stretchable and of fixed total length. The points where the webbing is joined have between them a length or section of lifeline having a length greater than the length of energy absorbing webbing. The non-stretchable, fixed length portion of the lifeline is preferably also webbing.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the energy absorbing section of the lifeline is joined in parallel with a non-energy absorbing section of the lifeline. The non-energy absorbing section is longer than the energy absorbing section to allow the energy absorbing section to stretch in a non-elastic way as energy is absorbed.
The lengths of lifeline and energy absorbing webbing can be compressed into a bundle and secured together by easily rupturable stitches, and secured together by shrink-wrapping.
Also according to the invention, there is provided a fall arrest block having a lifeline wound on a rotatable spindle and connected between the spindle and a harness attachment point, wherein:
The kinetic energy of the fall is absorbed by an energy absorbing means, which in a preferred embodiment is an energy absorbing section of the lifeline between the spindle and the harness attachment point.
The lifeline is wound on the spindle between a pair of hanger plates that transmit weight on the lifeline to a securing means by which the fall arrest block can be secured to an external strong point.
The securing means may include an aperture through in-contact portions of the hanger plates.
The spindle is preferably rotatable on a first bearing formed by direct contact between said unitary body and a smooth bearing surface extending around an aperture through a hanger plate.
The spindle may also be rotatable on a second bearing that is part of a coil rewind mechanism for automatically rewinding the lifeline.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a low friction film is applied to the inner surfaces of the hanger plates to help the lifeline to coil and uncoil evenly and smoothly.
The invention will now be further described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The Figures show a fall arrest block generally designated 10, with a drum housing cover 12, a length of webbing 14 and a hook 16. In use, a workman will attach the drum housing 12 via an aperture 13 that passes through the drum housing to a fixed strong point and the hook 16 to his safety harness. As he moves towards and away from the housing 12 in the course of normal working, a drum of coiled webbing 30 will be withdrawn from the housing 12 through a lower aperture 9 and will wind back onto the drum of coiled webbing 30 under the influence of a spring 40 within the housing 12.
The block 10 is small enough and lightweight enough for it to be easily carried around by a workman, so that it can be directly attached to a strong point wherever the work is taking place.
However, should the workman fall, a drum inertia mechanism 42, which will be described below, will immediately lock up and stop any webbing 14 being withdrawn. It is necessary for there to be energy absorption between the housing and the workman, so that the fall is broken gradually to avoid injury. To achieve this, the webbing adjacent the hook includes an energy absorbing region 18 which is shown in more detail in
The main load carrying webbing 14 is combined with a shorter length of extensible webbing 20, and the two lengths of webbing are folded up and encapsulated in a shrink-wrap sleeve 22.
As will be seen from
Within the drum housing 12, the drum of coiled webbing 30 is mounted for rotation between a pair of galvanised steel hanger plates 32, 32′. One end of the webbing (not shown) is securely fixed to the spindle 34 at a slot 35 which extends through a mid plane of the spindle. Although not illustrated, one way to make sure that the webbing cannot come free of the slot 35 is to sew the end of the webbing back on itself to form a loop that wraps around a metal pin or wedge that has a diameter too large to pass through the slot 35. The slot extends to a free end 39 of the spindle so that during assembly of the block 10, the loop and pin can be inserted into the slot 35. The webbing is then wrapped in a spiral around a spindle 34 and on previous wraps of webbing to form the coiled drum of webbing 30.
The rotation of the spindle 34 drives a toothed ratchet wheel 36. The spindle 34 is separated from the ratchet wheel 36 by a cylindrical step 29 having a diameter intermediate that of the spindle and ratchet wheel. The spindle 34, cylindrical step 29 and ratchet wheel 36 are formed in a unitary machined casting of high tensile brass. The spindle 34 and ratchet wheel 36 are therefore formed as one piece. As shown in
On the side of the drum of coiled webbing 30 remote from the ratchet wheel 36, there is a coil spring 40, secured to a second one of the hanger plates 32′. The spring 40 rewinds the webbing 14 onto the spindle 34 and drum of coiled webbing 30 when there is no tension in the webbing that has been played out.
The hanger plates 32, 32′ are generally parallel with each other either side of the coiled drum of webbing 30, and are joined at a top end by means of a pair of bolts/nuts 15, 15′ where the plates converge to come into contact with each other along a median plane of the drum of coiled webbing 30 to form a hanging section 17 that has a through aperture 19 which is in alignment with the aperture 13 in the drum housing 12.
The bottom end of the hanger plates 32, 32′ are held securely in a spaced apart parallel relationship by means of a pair of hollow posts 21 that are engaged with a corresponding pair of bolts/nuts 25, 25′.
Smooth and even winding and unwinding of the webbing 14 around the spindle 34 is ensured by a pair of low friction annular pads 31, 31′ (
The spindle 34 passes through a pair of circular apertures 27, 27′, one in each of the hanger plates 32, 32′
As shown in
The choice of materials, high tensile brass on the one hand, and a smooth low friction plastic material on the other, provides a reliable bearing having a smooth rotational movement without the need for any lubricants or other bearing components.
The free end of the spindle 39 terminates in a pair of prongs 11 that engage with the coil spring mechanism 40, which therefore also provides rotational support at this end of the spindle.
The inertia mechanism 42 is used to trigger movement of the locking arm 38 into engagement with the ratchet wheel teeth 37 to lock the spindle 34 and drum of coiled webbing 30 against rotation. This inertia mechanism is indicated generally at 42, and operates in a manner similar to that of a vehicle seatbelt mechanism. The inertia mechanism 42 is sensitive to acceleration of the drum rather than the speed of the drum, which means that it responds very quickly to a fall.
The inertia mechanism 42 has three main parts, namely an inertia weight 44, a second pawl 46 and an outer cap 48 a central portion of which has the general form of a cup 41 that faces towards the ratchet wheel 36. When the drum rotation accelerates, the inertia weight 44 moves to cause the second pawl 46 to move outwards into engagement with cup rim ratchet teeth 64 that extend inwardly around the inside rim 47 of the cup 41. The outer cap 48 therefore serves firstly as a locking cup to lock the rotation of the spindle 34 and ratchet wheel 36 to the outer cap 48. This causes the outer cap 48 to rotate to urge the locking arm 38 against the ratchet wheel teeth 37.
The inertia weight 44 is a generally circular or disc-shaped metal component with a boss 49, and a central bore 50 (
The bore 50 of the inertia weight 44 fits loosely over the outer surface 53 of the post 51 such that the weight would be free to rotate, in the absence of any other constraints, with respect to the cup 41. A central mounting post 52 that is coaxial with the spindle 34, but on the opposite side of the ratchet wheel 36, extends towards the boss 49 and cup 41 and is received in the bore 55 of the cup to locate the cup and the rest of the outer cap 48 with respect to an axis 43 of the spindle 34. The fit between the central mounting post 52 and the bore 55 is loose so that the ratchet wheel 36 is free to rotate with respect to the outer cap 48. The assembly of the inertia mechanism is completed by a rivet 77 that engages with a bore 78 in the central mounting post 52.
The central mounting post 52 is surrounded by a recess 54 in the ratchet wheel, which receives the annular wall of the boss. The internal and external diameters of the cup 48, the boss 49, the central mounting post 52 and the recess 54 are such that the inertia weight 44 is a loose fit on the post 51 with clearance between, on the one hand, the inertia weight and, on the other hand, the cup rim 47, the cup base plate 45 and the ratchet wheel 36 so that the inertia weight may move freely.
The second pawl 46 (
Under normal conditions, the tooth 58 does not project beyond the diameter of the inertia weight 44, and is kept in that position by a light spring 79 which engages with the second projection 60′ to bias the second pawl 46 towards the axis 43 of the spindle 34.
When the spindle 34 experiences sudden angular acceleration, such that static friction between the post surface 53 and weight bore 50 is insufficient to impart an equivalent angular acceleration in the weight 44, the inertia of the weight 44 will cause the rotational movement of the weight 44 to lag that of the spindle 34. As a result, the weight moves rotationally with respect to the spindle 34 and ratchet wheel 36.
As a result, the projection 60 of the second pawl 46 will move along the track 62 in the weight 44, thereby causing the tooth 58 to come into engagement with the cup rim ratchet teeth 64 on the inside of the cup 41. When that happens, the cup 41 and the spindle 34 will be locked together for rotation causing the cup 41 and the rest of the outer cap 48 to rotate. The rotation of the outer cap 48 will then bias the locking arm 38 against the ratchet wheel teeth 37, to lock the drum of coiled webbing 30.
The cup 48 is a plastic component. Once the drum of coiled webbing 30 is locked, the cup carries no load. As shown in
A plastic base 70 (
The inertia weight 44 is of complex shape. It has recesses for accommodating the light spring to bias the second pawl 46, and the angled track 62 is duplicated 62′ in a diametrically opposite position so that the weight is rotationally balanced.
In summary, the fall arrest block 10 has the spindle 34 on which a length of lifeline, which is preferably the webbing 14, is wound. In normal use, the lifeline retracts onto and extends from the drum housing 12, as the workman moves towards and away from a secure point to which the housing is attached. In the event of a fall, the inertia mechanism 42 sensitive to acceleration of the spindle 34 operates to lock a locking mechanism to hold the spindle 34 against further rotation. An energy absorbing link 18 is built into the webbing, proximate to the hook 16 to which the workman is attached. The energy absorbing link 18 includes a section of lifeline (the extensible webbing 20) that is stretchable, but non-elastic. The locking mechanism includes the toothed ratchet wheel 36 that is engaged by the first pawl 38 in order to lock the spindle rotation. The toothed ratchet wheel 36 is part of a unitary body with the step 29 and spindle 34.
The arrangement described above, in which an inertia trigger is used to lock up the spindle 34 and drum of coiled webbing 30 to halt paying out of webbing 14, serves to stop the movement of the drum of webbing very quickly. This is particularly important when the block is used by people working at relatively low heights above the ground, so that they do not hit the ground before the block has time to arrest their fall.
The drum housing 12 is quite compact, measuring in total 147 mm along a vertical direction (from above the securing aperture 13 to the lower aperture 9), 112 mm in width, and just 80 mm in thickness along the direction of the rotational axis 43.
The arrangement described above also provides a fall arrest block 10 that is compact in the axial dimension, that is, the dimension parallel with the rotational axis 43 of the spindle 34. This compact form makes it easier for a user to carry and to fix to secure points. This is a particular benefit when working in exposed locations or areas with restricted access. Features of the apparatus which contribute to reducing the thickness of the block include the use of two steel hanger plates.
Because the spindle 34, step 29 and ratchet wheel 36 are formed as a unitary piece, there is no need for any additional components to join or fix these parts together and this again helps to reduce the dimensions of these parts in an axial direction.
The choice of materials, high tensile brass for the spindle 34 and ratchet wheel 36, and a plastic bushing inside an aperture in a steel hanger plate, provides a reliable and long lasting bearing having a smooth rotational movement without the need for any lubricants or other bearing components. This also helps to minimise the dimensions of the assembly in the axial direction.
The use of the coil spring mechanism 40 to provide rotational support at the free end 39 of the spindle 34 eliminates the need for any other bearing components between the spindle and the rear hanger plate 32′, which again simplifies construction and helps to minimise the width of the assembly in the axial direction.
The arrangement described above also does not need to employ rotatable flanges fixed to the spindle. This is because the parallel separation and smooth inner profile of the hanger plates, aided by the use of a low friction film applied to the inner surfaces of the hanger plates. Avoiding the need for rotatable flanges also helps to keep the axial dimensions of the apparatus to a minimum.
Further advantages are provided by avoiding the need for a complicated bearing between the spindle and hanger plates. As the bearing is either provided within the overall thickness of the first hanger plate, or outside the second hanger plate within the rewind spring mechanism, bearings to not impinge on the space between the hanger plates, which can therefore be spaced apart with the minimum separation required to ensure smooth running of the lifeline as this is played out or wound in. This also helps to keep the axial dimensions of the apparatus to a minimum.
The invention therefore provides a convenient and compact fall arrest block for use by a workman working above the ground.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0715785.2 | Aug 2007 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/002718 | 8/11/2008 | WO | 00 | 3/10/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/022122 | 2/19/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1308480 | Caouette | Jul 1919 | A |
2943512 | Nicolaus | Jul 1960 | A |
2990131 | Carlsson | Jun 1961 | A |
3760910 | Koshihara | Sep 1973 | A |
4088201 | MacFarlane | May 1978 | A |
4185792 | Weman | Jan 1980 | A |
4190213 | Ueda | Feb 1980 | A |
4228970 | Morinaga | Oct 1980 | A |
4463830 | Geurtsen | Aug 1984 | A |
4480716 | Soubry et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4564154 | Takada | Jan 1986 | A |
4607805 | Burghardt et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4811912 | Takada | Mar 1989 | A |
4830309 | Koike | May 1989 | A |
4877110 | Wolner | Oct 1989 | A |
4941549 | Da-Tan et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5094405 | Brum | Mar 1992 | A |
5186289 | Wolner et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5343976 | Ostrobrod | Sep 1994 | A |
5351906 | Feathers | Oct 1994 | A |
5447280 | Feathers | Sep 1995 | A |
5593105 | Schmid et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5771993 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5829548 | Ostrobrod | Nov 1998 | A |
5899298 | Crouse, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
6129302 | Horcher | Oct 2000 | A |
6279682 | Feathers | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7025171 | Cox | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7237650 | Casebolt | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7395984 | Szarkowski et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20050145435 | Choate | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050269153 | Casebolt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20090223744 | Dowie | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110088976 | Jones et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2437074 | Oct 2007 | GB |
WO9519203 | Jul 1995 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Defintion of “webbing” provided in the NonFinal Action The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. |
Defintion of “unitary” provided in NonFinal Action The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110100766 A1 | May 2011 | US |