Fan and fan blades

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11965521
  • Patent Number
    11,965,521
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 4, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 23, 2024
    7 months ago
Abstract
A fan blade (1) has a front inflow edge (2) and a rear outflow edge (3). The fan blade (1) has an at least partially wavy inflow edge (4) that forms a wave (W) having a specific three-dimensional waveform.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a 371 U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2021/055473, filed Mar. 4, 2021, which claims priority to DE Application No. 102020106534.5, filed Mar. 10, 2020. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.


BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates to a fan and a fan blade, in particular, to an axial fan or diagonal fan.


Fans are used, for example, in heat exchangers for suction via the exchanger assembly. However, the inflow to the fan is strongly turbulent. The turbulent inflow to the fan results in a significant increase of the sound emission, this means annoying noise generation. The degree of turbulence Tu and the so-called turbulent length dimension ∧ can be metrologically determined to characterize the inflow. The degree of turbulence is the ratio of fluctuation value of the speed to the mean value. The turbulent length dimension is the average dimension of the turbulent structures. It corresponds to the path length over which speed fluctuations are correlated with one another. The heat exchanger is essentially constructed from pipes having fins.


In current fans or fan wheels, fluidically favorably formed ventilator fans enable a high performance, in particular, with respect to the achieved through flow volume or the pressure buildup. In principle, there is a demand for low-noise fans with good aerodynamics, at the same time, in spite of turbulent incident flow. However, here, strong noise generation in operation of a fan often remains problematic. The noises arise when the turbulent inflow strikes the ventilator fan.


There are diverse design measures to reduce these problems in the prior art. Document DE 19948075 A uses an axial fan with blades that have a double-sickled, leading fan edge with a protruding outer corner to reduce the running noise. U.S. Pat. No. 3,416,725 A discloses a blade shape with a double-sickled inflow edge and a lightly single-sickled outflow edge.


DE 10326637 B3 describes a further solution, namely a fan with alternating rotational direction, that has S-shaped sickled blades with inflow edge receding strongly outward. WO 1998005868 A1 discloses a numeric method for aero-acoustic optimization of an axial fan or its blade geometry. U.S. Pat. No. 2,649,921 provides a fan with very short and wide blades and triple-curved inflow and outflow edges. Furthermore, U.S. Pat. No. 5,533,865 A discloses a rotor for a windmill, with blades that have sawtooth-shaped outflow edges. Jagged or wavy outflow edges are used to reduce the outflow edge sound (for example, GB 2497739 or EP 1801422 A2). DE 102009044824 A1 uses porosities, in the form of holes, in the region of the outflow edge to reduce the sound occurring at the outflow edge.


In the case of turbulent inflow, the sound that arises at the outflow edge is of subordinate importance in relation to the sound occurring at the inflow edge. Thus, wavy or jagged inflow edges are also known to reduce the noise in the event of turbulent inflow. U.S. Pat. No. 6,431,498 B1 describes a wavy inflow edge that results, due to various cuts in the spanwise direction. The front region is extended up to the thickness maximum in the chord-wise direction. U.S. Pat. No. 9,249,666 B2 describes an alternative design of the wave on the inflow edge, where the profile is not extended in the chord-wise direction, but rather leaves the reference profile to the pressure side or to the suction side. A special inflow edge wave in the form of a double sine is described in EP 3121 376 B1. WO2013/180296 uses jagged inflow edges with a triangular shape. Document DE 102017212231 A1 describes a combination of a wavy inflow edge with a wavy outflow edge. The waves on the inflow edge have greater wavelengths in comparison to the outflow edge.


The wave trough is an important location of the occurrence of sound in wavy or jagged inflow edges. Further documents relate to modifications of the blade in the region of the trough. JP6409666B2 uses additional guiding elements on the blade in the region of the trough. A recess of the jagged inflow edge in the trough is described in JP5978886B2.


SUMMARY

Against this technical background, the disclosure relates to the problem of providing a fan or fan blade that operates with low noise in particular in the event of turbulent inflow, and at the same time, has good aerodynamic properties. The disclosure solves this problem using a fan according to the independent claims. The dependent claims contain advantageous embodiments.


Before the disclosure is described in more detail, several concepts and the terminology used will be explained for better comprehension of the disclosure. For this purpose, a typical axial and diagonal fan is considered, usually with multiple fan blades arranged in a star shape on a central hub for the fluidic suction and/or compression of the air surrounding the fan or a gas to be conveyed by the fan. The fan blades can be connected to one another by a circumferential ring at the radial outermost profile surface.


Each fan blade has a front inflow edge and a rear outflow edge. The front inflow edge leads in operation in the intended rotational direction. The rear outflow edge trails in operation of the fan in the intended rotational direction. Thus, depending on the rotational direction and the fan blade profile, there is a suction side and a pressure side. The pressure side is typically located on the convex side and the suction side is typically located on the concave side of the fan blade. In general, the inflow and outflow edges are usually only optimally formed for one rotational direction. The fan blade thus has a suction side, that suctions in the inflowing air in operation, and a pressure side, opposite to the suction side, where the pressure for expelling the air builds up.


The fan according to the disclosure is distinguished in relation to a comparable conventional fan by a noise-reduced operation in the event of turbulent inflow. As already mentioned above, a fan according to the disclosure uses at least one fan blade according to the disclosure. This fan blade achieves a noise production reduced in relation to comparable conventional fans by a special design.


The mechanism of the increased occurrence of sound is based on the turbulent inflow being connected to a temporal change of the inflow of the fan. The turbulence results in temporal variations of the forces occurring on the blade, due to which a corresponding fluctuating sound emission is triggered. The intensity of such fluctuations is of particular importance. The higher the degree of turbulence in the inflow and thus the fluctuations of the relevant flow variables in the inflow of the fan, the more strongly a sound emission is produced or, in other words, the louder the operation of such a fan is perceived.


Studies of diverse modifications of front-side inflow edges of blade profiles in turbulent inflow display positive acoustic effects when the inflow edge is embodied as wavy or with a wave-like serrated form. It is possible to recognize, according to the disclosure, that the essential mechanism that results in reduction of the emitted sound emission is that a decorrelation of the sources takes place on the blade. A turbulent inflow appears chaotic, but is not completely chaotic, but rather correlates with geometric factors. The above-mentioned length dimension ∧ is the path length over which a specific correlation of the turbulent fluctuations can be established.


However, studies have shown that acoustically active wavy inflow edges have aerodynamically worse properties. Thus, one skilled in the art, is initially deterred from designing such forms. The present disclosure is directed to a design of the inflow edge wave that is acoustically and aerodynamically advantageous. This is because it has been shown according to the disclosure that the formation of a very specific waveform is particularly advantageous.


One basic concept of the disclosure is that the inflow edge, at least in sections, has a specific three-dimensional wavy form or is made three-dimensionally wavy. The waveform differs significantly from the prior art. It is furthermore advantageous if the wavy inflow edge is embodied with a porosity. According to the disclosure, a fan blade with an inflow edge and an outflow edge is provided. The fan blade has, at least in one section, a wavy inflow edge with a periodically repeating waveform of the period length λ, that is different from a sinusoidal or nearly sinusoidal waveform, in particular, is different from a sinusoidal or nearly sinusoidal waveform with equal period length λ.


In a regularly repeating physical occurrence, the period (period length) is the smallest position distance after which the occurrence repeats.


It is furthermore advantageous for this purpose, if the wavy inflow edge has two or more periodically repeating waveforms. The effect according to the disclosure occurs when the desired waveform is formed over multiple periods.


Wave troughs and wave peaks can thus be formed alternately on the front edge. They are formed along the inflow edge, that are provided in a specific periodicity.


The optimum range of wavelength and amplitude, that provides both aerodynamic and also acoustic improvements at the same time, was ascertained from experimental studies. The so-called peak-trough value H of the wave is the distance from the highest point to the lowest point. For a focus on the reduction of the sound power, waves with greater height (large peak-trough value H) and smaller wavelengths tend to be used (small λ/H). For a reduction of the input power, small peak-trough values H and larger wavelengths are advantageous (greater λ/H). With respect to the impeller diameter D, preferred peak-trough values H in the range of 0.01≤H/D≤0.1 are advantageous.


In a corresponding advantageous embodiment of the disclosure, the peak-trough value H of the wave troughs is defined from the front edge in this region of the wavy inflow edge to the respective wave trough (viewed in the flow direction). Values for the ratio between the period length λ and the peak-trough value H are in the range 0.2≤λ/H≤2. The values can vary along the inflow edge.


A solution has proven to be particularly effective where a waveform differing from a sine form with deeply-cut wave troughs in each period, i.e., sufficiently strongly pronounced wave troughs, is provided. For this purpose, the amplitude or the peak-trough value is to have a specific value in relation to the chord length of the fan blade. Lightly pronounced or only sinusoidal wave troughs have been shown to be inadequately effective. Rather, the peak-trough value of the wave troughs in the region of the wavy inflow edge is preferably to be approximately 10%-30% of the chord length SL, more preferably 10% to 20% of the chord length SL. In relation to the imaginary sine wave with equal number of periods, the peak-trough value is to be greater, that results in steeper flanks in relation to the flow direction in the wave trough.


It is therefore preferred if the repeating waveform forms at least one wave trough with two “steep” wave flanks that extend toward one another and each obliquely to the flow direction per period. It is particularly advantageous here if the (lateral) wave flanks, extending obliquely to the wave trough in this region of the inflow edge (in particular in a section close to the flank center), extend in relation to the flow direction at a tangential angle β between 15° and 35°, preferably a tangential angle β of 25° to 30°.


This also causes a significantly stronger curvature progression in the wave troughs of a waveform according to the disclosure in relation to the curvature progression in a sinusoidal wave trough.


In a further alternative exemplary embodiment, the repeating waveform (the waveform that is arranged periodically) forms two adjacent wave troughs with a wave peak located in between, that extends against the flow direction in the direction of the inflow-side front edge. The two lateral flanks that delimit this waveform accordingly extend obliquely, as explained above.


According to the disclosure, the following process can be used for the design of the wave, namely the waveform in the region of the wavy inflow edge that extends at least in sections or completely through multiple, in particular six common points of intersection (support points) with an imaginary sine wave, but differs in its shape from a sine wave.


In the alternative exemplary embodiment, where a wave peak is located between two wave troughs, the peak-trough value h2 of such a wave peak is approximately 10% to 80% in absolute value of the peak-trough value H of the directly adjacent wave peak(s).


In addition, it is advantageous to adapt the wavy inflow edge locally to the flow approximately in the middle of a period, at half wavelength. For this purpose, an offset of the inflow edge perpendicular to the center line between pressure side and suction side of the blade is introduced. This offset improves the inflow of the inflow edge and helps to avoid flow separations in this region. This offset is preferably embodied in the direction of the pressure side. It is advantageous if the blade profile has a specific, in particular, wavy structure in specific sections in addition to the wavy inflow edge. For this purpose, the blade profile (viewed in a profile section in the region of a wave peak) can respectively form a bump protruding on the suction side (SS) and a dent at the corresponding opposing position of the pressure side (DS). The surface profile is defined in each case so that the surface curvature changes twice viewed in the flow direction. If the surface profile on the upper side (suction side) approximately corresponds to the opposing surface profile on the lower side (pressure side), the blade profile has an approximately uniform thickness, but bulges somewhat on the suction side.


In a further improvement, the blade profile curves farther toward the pressure side frontally in the region of the inflow edge (viewed in a profile section) in comparison to the or a region adjacent thereto curved less toward the pressure side. A specific additional wavy structure of the blade is thus achieved, preferably with a spacing of one period, more preferably from period center to period center.


An additional improvement of the noise behavior can be achieved where the fan blade is formed in the region of the inflow edge with a plurality of continuous channels through the fan blade from the pressure side to the suction side (region having porosity). Due to the use of porosities in the region of the blade edges interacting with the turbulence, a further reduction of the sound emission can be achieved. The porosities can be formed by holes or by slots. These are through openings, that enable a pressure equalization between the suction side and the pressure side of the fan blade. The hole diameter or the width of the slots assumes values in a range up to approximately 2 mm in one preferred embodiment. The porous region preferably comprises only a section of the inflow edge, where the section is less than up to approximately 20% of the blade length.


A combination of multiple geometric design elements according to the disclosure is particularly advantageous, where the special features specific to the disclosure are to be taken into consideration in each case. Thus, for example, a combination of porosity and three-dimensionally formed wave in the region of the inflow edge is possible.


The present disclosure relates in particular to an axial or diagonal fan, that has one or more above-described fan blades.


Other advantageous refinements of the disclosure are described in the dependent claims or are described in more detail hereinafter together with the description of the preferred embodiment of the disclosure on the basis of the figures.





DRAWINGS

In the figures:



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a fan blade with a wavy inflow edge in sections;



FIG. 2 is an elevation cross-section a detail view of a profile section B through the fan blade in the peak of the inflow edge wave to explain the specific “S-waviness”;



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a sine waveform of a wave at the inflow edge and a waveform modified in relation thereto, which extends through support points of the sine wave, variants with inflection points and deeper-cut wave trough;



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a sine waveform of a wave at the inflow edge and a waveform modified in relation thereto, that extends through support points of the sine wave, variants with additional wave peak between two wave troughs;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a fan blade with an inflow edge wavy in sections with additional wave peak;



FIG. 6 is a detail cross-section view of a profile section through the fan blade to explain the adaptation of the flow angle at half wavelength;



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of an exemplary axial fan with five fan blades;



FIG. 8 is a perspective view of an exemplary diagonal fan with a circumferential ring having five fan blades.





DETAIL DESCRIPTION

The disclosure is explained in more detail hereinafter on the basis of an exemplary embodiment with reference to FIGS. 1 to 8. Identical reference signs in the figures indicate identical structural and/or functional features.



FIG. 1 shows a fan blade 1 with an inflow edge that is wavy in sections. The fan blade 1 has an inflow edge 2, 4 and an outflow edge 3. An at least partially wavy region on the inflow edge, that is identified by inflow edge 4, forms a wave of a specific waveform in this region of the inflow edge 4. The inflow edge of a reference blade without a wavy inflow edge is identified by 2*. The reference blade represents a non-optimized blade without the features of the present disclosure.


In addition, two circumferentially extending profile section lines A and B are shown. The position of the profile section A is selected so that the chord length of the fan blade 1 with the wavy inflow edge 4 approximately corresponds to the chord length of a reference blade with a non-wavy inflow edge 2*. The position of the profile section B is selected so that it extends through a wave peak of the fan blade 1 having the wavy inflow edge 4.



FIG. 2 is a detail view of the profile section B in the wavy region of the inflow edge 4 of the fan blade 1 to explain an S-shaped wave. The profile having the wavy inflow edge 4 leaves the reference profile having the non-wavy inflow edge 2* close to the inflow edge in the direction of pressure side DS and further downstream in the direction of suction side SS.


A measure is described hereinafter for how the waveform at the inflow edge can be derived or optimized starting from a sine wave. The waveform is defined over multiple support points S of the sine curve and the curve profile results by a spline interpolation. For this purpose, FIG. 3 shows a schematic view of an imaginary sine waveform 5 at the inflow edge and a modified waveform 6, that extends through six support points S on the sine wave 5 and an additional support point S1 in the middle of the wave. The peak-trough value H of the wave 6 is the distance from the highest point to the lowest point. The deviation from the sine wave is defined by a length h1 and the selection of the support points S. This waveform 6 causes a “deeper-cut” wave trough 7 of the waveform 6 with respect to the peak-trough value H.


In comparison to the sine waveform, the two flanks K1, K2 dropping toward the wave trough 7 are located closer together and their angle of attack is steeper in relation to the sine wave with respect to the direction of the inflow speed v. The effective inflow velocity, i.e., the component of the inflow speed v perpendicular to the inflow edge, with which the disturbance strikes on the inflow edge of the fan blade, is reduced with a steeper profile of the edge. This results in more effective reduction of the emitted sound. Preferred values for h1 are preferably in the range 0<h1<h with h=amplitude of the sine wave.



FIG. 4 shows a further alternative variation of the location of the support points. The support point in the middle of the wave is positioned upstream against the inflow direction, so that an additional wave peak 8 results in the middle of the wave. The deviation from the sine wave is defined by a length h2 and the selection of the support points S. Preferred values for h2 are in the range 0<h2<2h with h=amplitude of the sine wave.



FIG. 5 shows an embodied fan blade 1 having inflow edge 4 wavy in sections with additional wave peaks 8. The circumferentially extending profile section shown having the profile section line C is selected so that it extends through an additional wave peak 8 of the family 1 having the wavy input edge 4.



FIG. 6 is a detail view of the profile section C in the region of the wavy inflow edge of the fan blade 1 to explain a local adaptation of the blade profile in the region of the inflow edge to the inflow. The profile section is shifted in the region of the regional inflow edge 4 essentially perpendicularly to the center line between pressure side and suction side of the blade by the length h3 in the direction of the pressure side DS. The profile section thus adapted having modified inflow edge 9 prevents flow separations and noise emissions linked thereto. The described advantageous adaptation of the profile section is preferably in the middle of the wave, i.e., it can be located both in the region of the additional wave peak 8 and also in the region of the trough 7.



FIG. 7 shows an exemplary axial fan having five fan blades 1.



FIG. 8 shows an exemplary diagonal fan having circumferential ring 10 having five fan blades 1.


The disclosure is not restricted in its embodiment to the above-described preferred exemplary embodiments. Rather, a number of variants is conceivable, that makes use of the described solution even in fundamentally differently designed embodiments.

Claims
  • 1. A fan blade for a radial fan comprising an inflow edge and an outflow edge, the fan blade has, at least in one section, a wavy inflow edge with a periodically repeating waveform of a period length A, which is different from a sinusoidal or nearly sinusoidal waveform, in particular is different from a sinusoidal or nearly sinusoidal waveform having equal period length A; the repeating waveform forms, per period, two adjacent wave troughs between two flanks extending toward one another obliquely to the flow direction and the obliquely extending wave flanks extend at a steeper tangential angle in relation to the flow direction in or close to their flank center and form steeper flanks in relation to the flow direction in comparison to two extending wave flank in a sinusoidal waveform;the repeating waveform forms, per period, two adjacent wave troughs, between two flanks extending toward one another obliquely to the flow direction, with a wave peak located in between the two wave troughs, that extends against the flow direction in the direction of the inflow-side front edge; andpeak-trough value of the wave peak, which is located directly between two adjacent wave troughs, is approximately 10% to 80% in absolute value of the peak-trough value of the directly adjacent wave peak(s).
  • 2. The fan blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the wavy inflow edge has two or more periodically repeating waveforms.
  • 3. The fan blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the peak-trough value H of the wave, measured from the front edge in the region of the wavy inflow edge to the wave trough, has values viewed in the flow direction in relation to the period length λ, that are in the range 0.2≤λ/H≤2, wherein the values can vary along the inflow edge.
  • 4. The fan blade as claimed in claim 3, wherein the fan blade, in particular in the region of the wavy inflow edge, has a chord length SL and the peak-trough value H in the region of the wave troughs is preferably approximately 10% of 30% of the chord length SL S.
  • 5. The fan blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the obliquely extending wave flanks extend in or close to their flank middle in relation to the flow direction at a tangential angle β between 15° and 35.
  • 6. The fan blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the inflow edge, insofar as it has a wavy region and a non-wavy region, the wave region protrudes, at least in the region of existing wave peaks, against the flow direction in relation to the inflow edge in the non-wavy region.
  • 7. The fan blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the blade profile, at least viewed in a profile section in the region of a wave peak, respectively has a bump protruding out of the suction side and a dent extending on the pressure side, the surface profile of which is respectively defined so that the surface curvature changes twice viewed in the flow direction.
  • 8. The fan blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the blade profile, viewed in a profile section, curves farther toward the pressure side frontally in the region of the inflow edge in a profile section in comparison to a or the region adjacent thereto curved less toward the pressure side, with a spacing of one period.
  • 9. The fan blade as claimed in claim 1, wherein the fan blade is formed porous at least in sections in the region of the inflow edge, having a connection from pressure side to suction side, having a plurality of channels extending through the fan blade.
  • 10. An axial fan or diagonal fan having one or more fan blades as claimed in claim 1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2020 106 534.5 Mar 2020 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2021/055473 3/4/2021 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2021/180559 9/16/2021 WO A
US Referenced Citations (27)
Number Name Date Kind
2649921 Faber Aug 1953 A
3416725 Bohanon Dec 1968 A
4089618 Patel May 1978 A
5533865 Dassen et al. Jul 1996 A
5603607 Kondo et al. Feb 1997 A
6431498 Watts et al. Aug 2002 B1
7261513 Umeyama et al. Aug 2007 B2
9249666 Wood Feb 2016 B2
9869324 Shiraichi et al. Jan 2018 B2
9951626 Gruber Apr 2018 B2
10301942 Joseph et al. May 2019 B2
10400605 Nakashima et al. Sep 2019 B2
11022139 Froh et al. Jun 2021 B2
11149551 Teramoto Oct 2021 B2
11371529 Loercher Jun 2022 B2
20030152459 Gliebe Aug 2003 A1
20100164488 Lowe et al. Jul 2010 A1
20130164488 Wood Jun 2013 A1
20140023501 Ikeda et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140072435 Choi et al. Mar 2014 A1
20150152875 Kamiya et al. Jun 2015 A1
20160010656 Shiraichi et al. Jan 2016 A1
20180030996 Schilling et al. Feb 2018 A1
20190024674 Loercher Jan 2019 A1
20190226492 Krishnaswami Jul 2019 A1
20200040736 Teramoto Feb 2020 A1
20210340992 Yuan et al. Nov 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
107023515 Aug 2017 CN
110701100 Jan 2020 CN
3137554 Mar 1983 DE
19948075 May 2000 DE
10326637 Jan 2005 DE
102009044824 Jun 2010 DE
102013216575 Feb 2015 DE
102015216579 Mar 2017 DE
102017212231 Jan 2019 DE
1801422 Jun 2007 EP
3121376 Sep 2017 EP
3617528 Mar 2020 EP
2513324 Mar 1983 FR
2497739 Jun 2013 GB
2003232295 Aug 2003 JP
2003278696 Oct 2003 JP
2015-063912 Apr 2015 JP
5978886 Aug 2016 JP
2017110555 Jun 2017 JP
6409666 Oct 2018 JP
WO-1998005868 Feb 1998 WO
WO-2013180296 Dec 2013 WO
WO-2018211270 Nov 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
International Search Report (English and German) of the International Searching Authority.
Issued in PCT/EP2021/055473, mailed May 17, 2021; ISA/EP.
“Waveform”; Mar. 28, 2019; Wikipedia (Year: 2019).
U.S. Appl. No. 17/941,566, filed Sep. 9, 2022, Marc Schneider.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/910,461, filed Sep. 9, 2022, Marc Schneider.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/910,504, filed Sep. 9, 2022, Marc Schneider.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230132350 A1 Apr 2023 US