The present application is a section 371 of PCT/EP08/09702, filed 17 Nov. 2008, published 28 May 2009 as WO-2009-065540, and further claims priority from German application DE 10 2007 057 100.5, filed 19 Nov. 2007, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to a fan arrangement with influence on the electrical power that it consumes.
When a fan is driven by an electric motor, what results is a combination of the properties of the fan and the properties of the electric motor.
A variety of fan designs exist, e.g. radial fans, transverse-flow blowers, axial fans, and diagonal fans. Radial fans are divided into radial fans having backward-curved blades, and radial fans having forward-curved blades. There are likewise many further sub-types in the case of the other designs.
The properties of a fan result from the so-called fan output characteristic curve, which indicates the quantity of air per hour (m3/h) delivered by the fan at a particular static pressure Δpf [Pascal], and from the motor characteristic curve, which indicates how much power the motor needs in order to deliver a specific quantity of air per hour.
The power requirement is further determined by the operating conditions of the fan. For example, when a fan is blowing air from outside into a room in which all the doors and windows are closed, the fan is operating at maximum static pressure. “Free outlet” blowing, conversely, means that the fan is located unrestrictedly in a space, and that no physical separation, and also no pressure difference, exists between its intake side and delivery side. This means that a free outlet fan has a different power requirement than a fan that is delivering air into the interior of a closed space.
An examination of the curve for a fan arrangement's power consumption plotted against generated volumetric air flow rate reveals that this power is highly dependent on the working point that is set, or on the pressure buildup in the fan. In the case of a radial fan, for example, maximum power is usually reached with free outlet, i.e. at a pressure elevation Δpf=0 whereas, for an axial fan, it is reached at a maximum pressure elevation Δpf=maximum.
Radial fans are normally used at a higher static pressure. When they work without static pressure, i.e. in free-outlet fashion, they are being operated at their power limit, i.e. a radial fan must be designed for this operating point even though in practice it occurs seldom and in rather arbitrary fashion. This limits the power of such a fan under other operating conditions.
It is an object of the invention to make available a novel fan arrangement.
This object is achieved by employing both a controller which compares the electrical power being consumed with a predetermined maximum motor power, and a limiting arrangement for adjusting pulse-width modulation signals if the power being consumed exceeds the maximum permissible motor power.
Fan arrangements are normally designed so that the maximum permissible winding temperature of the electric motor is not exceeded at maximum electrical power consumption. This means that a fan arrangement of this kind is “understressed” for many applications, i.e. at most working points it is operating below its maximum permissible power level.
What is achieved by means of the invention is that a fan arrangement of this kind can be operated at its permissible power limit, i.e. an improved air output characteristic curve is obtained with the same fan. The approach in this context is to operate the fan arrangement always in the region of its maximum permissible power, i.e. at the power limit or close to it, and thereby to achieve a greater volumetric flow rate for the same counterpressure, i.e. to increase the air output without requiring a larger fan arrangement for that purpose. Different solutions may be produced in this context depending on the type of fan arrangement.
It is also important, in practical terms, that users are accustomed to modifying the air output of an axial fan by way of a rotation speed control system. The result of this can be, however, that the power consumed by the fan at maximum rotation speed becomes too high, with the consequence that the electric motor becomes too hot. With an axial fan this is normally the case only when the static pressure Δpf to the left of the so-called saddle becomes very high. This is because the normal working range of an axial fan is just below the saddle, since flow detachments at the fan blades occur in the area of the saddle and produce a drastic increase in fan noise.
For this reason, a fan of this kind is operated with normal rotation speed control over a large portion of its operating range. If the electrical power consumed by the fan motor becomes too high, however, said power is limited, in the embodiment described below, to a permissible value. This makes it possible to operate the fan in speed-controlled fashion up to a predetermined volumetric flow rate, and then in power-limited fashion at even higher pressure. The advantage of this is that the air output of the fan can be modified, as usual, by way of the rotation speed control system. Only in maximum rotation speed ranges does power limiting become active, in this case, at high static pressure. For an axial fan, this is normally the case only with a static pressure to the left of the “saddle.” The normal working range of an axial fan is just below the “saddle,” and in this range the fan can be operated normally with its speed control system.
By operating the fan motor at its power limit, it is possible to achieve considerably greater air output with the same fan; this can be important in terms of cooling, especially on hot days.
Further details and advantageous refinements of the invention are evident from the exemplifying embodiments, in no way to be understood as a limitation of the invention, that are described below and depicted in the drawings. In the drawings:
The rotation speed nist of motor 22 can be regulated to a value nsoll. nsoll is often determined by the temperature in the vicinity of fan arrangement 20, for example by means of a temperature sensor 23 as depicted in
For rotation speed control, the present rotation speed nist of motor 22 is also continuously detected and is delivered to a comparator 26, along with the desired rotation speed nsoll (see
The output signal of comparator 26 is delivered to a controller 27 which, depending on requirements, can be, for example, a P controller, a P1 controller, or a PID controller. Controller 27 has an output 28 at which a control input is obtained and is delivered to a limiter 29. The latter limits the control input to a predetermined value.
The limited signal at output 32 of limiter 29 is delivered to a PWM module 34 and transformed there into a PWM signal 36 that is delivered to motor 22 and controls current imot therein. PWM modules of this kind are known.
A fan arrangement according to
Curves 44, 46 of an axial fan as depicted in
Such fans are normally operated just below saddle 48 and 50 and at a low static pressure, i.e. in the case of
Motor 22 of an axial fan of this kind is normally designed so that it operates on curves 44, 46 of
The present case is different: as
Proceeding farther to the left in
This would create the risk that motor 22 might overheat and consequently be damaged or destroyed. This must be prevented, and for that reason the fan arrangement according to
As a result of the invention, fan arrangement 22 is therefore influenced so that fan 24 (of whatever type) operates at its full output specifically at high static pressures and delivers more air in that context, of course with a higher power consumption.
It is very advantageous that a standard control circuit, in which the fan rotation speed is regulated by pulse width modulation, can be used for rotation speed control. In a deviation from the standard solution, however, the setting signal for PWM module 34 is limited as soon as the maximum motor power Pmax is reached. Alternatively, the duty factor of PWM signal 36 can also be limited directly when the power limit is reached.
Characteristic curves 52 in
The arrangement described is very advantageous for all types of fans, since the user will still encounter the usual characteristics of a speed-controlled fan, but with increased fan air output.
Because fan motor 22 is operated at its maximum power limit (Pmax in
The same working principle is also possible, for example, with radial fans, where once again a considerable increase in air output is obtained. Such radial fans can then also preferably have a reduced number of stator windings, the wire diameter being increased in order to achieve the same copper fill factor.
If the operating voltage Ub of a fan arrangement 20 of this kind fluctuates, different motor currents imot are produced at different voltages Ub. An arrangement 20 of this kind is designed, as standard, so that the maximum required power is achieved at rated voltage, and so that motor current imot is reduced in the event of overvoltage. Motor 22 is therefore not utilized less effectively than in the case of comparable arrangements 20 of the existing art.
In the arrangement according to
This situation is depicted schematically in
Also depicted is the target rotation speed nsoll*, shown in this case as 4000 rpm as an example, at which motor 22 is working at its maximum power Pmax, in this case 100 W as an example. This speed nsoll* is not a constant value. In the case of a fan, for example, it depends on the so-called static pressure Δpf, i.e. if the fan is a radial fan and if the air flow at its outlet is throttled, the static pressure increases and the maximum permissible power, i.e. 100 W in the example, is already reached e.g. at a target rotation speed nsoll=3500 rpm. In this case, it would therefore not be possible to set a speed greater than 3500 rpm, since that would be prevented by the power controller.
When the maximum power is reached, the rotation speed therefore cannot be increased further, i.e. even though the user sets a higher rotation speed nsoll, this setting has no influence on the actual rotation speed nist of motor 22.
This is depicted schematically in
An operator might get the impression, from this, that speed controller 26, 27 is defective.
This problem is avoided by the arrangement according to
In
In
The power Pist consumed by motor 22 is calculated in multiplier 70 by multiplying imot and umot, and this value Pist is delivered to a comparator 102.
The target power value Psoll is also delivered to comparator 102 from a target value unit 104, and the output signal 106 of comparator 102 is delivered to controller 98, which (via PWM unit 34) modifies the value Pist until Pist=Psoll.
Input 164 is connected to the cathode of a Zener diode 166 whose anode is connected to ground 168 and with which a capacitor 170 is connected in parallel. A resistor 172 is located between input 164 and terminal 162. Terminal 162 is connected via a resistor 174 to a positive voltage, e.g. +5 V.
PWM signal 160 is smoothed by RC element 172, 170. Zener diode 166 prevents voltage peaks in control signal UCTL. The latter is converted in target value unit 104 into a target power value Psoll for motor 22, which is delivered as described to comparator 102. PWM signal 160 can be converted in this fashion into a target power value for motor 22, and this target value increases as the duty cycle of PWM signal 160 increases.
The constant power was set in
Many variants and modifications are of course possible in the context of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 057 100 | Nov 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/009702 | 11/17/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/3/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/065540 | 5/28/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4268781 | Kawada et al. | May 1981 | A |
6301090 | Mack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6779981 | Huang et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6882122 | Sutter et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7456597 | Kanamori et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20060226799 | Lin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080310967 | Franz et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19816837 | Mar 1999 | DE |
19944194 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10040080 | Mar 2002 | DE |
10115675 | Oct 2002 | DE |
202004006714 | Jul 2004 | DE |
0 518 538 | Dec 1992 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Engineering Toolbox, “Process Controllers” 2005, www.engineeringtoolbox.com. |
Wikipedia, “PI Controller” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PI—controller. |
Free Dictionary, “PID Controller” http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100283420 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |