The present application relates to gas turbine engines and, more particularly, to a fan hub design.
Fan hub designs are routinely optimized to meet various criterias. Such criterias include uniform radial hub displacement, hub fatigue stress, tooling access for machining, oil drainage, air foil fillet stress, burst speed and weight minimization.
According to one aspect, there is provided a fan blade hub for a gas turbine engine compressor. The fan blade hub has a plurality of fan blades secured in spaced-apart relationship about an outer surface of a rim section of the fan blade hub. The rim section is integrally connected to a central neck section through a web section. The web section has an inward concavature and extends aft of the center of gravity of the fan blades to shift the center of gravity of the hub rearwards to reduce airfoil stresses. The rim section has a lower surface merging uninterrupted into a front upper curved surface of the web section.
According to another aspect, there is provided a fan blade hub for a gas turbine engine compressor. The fan blade hub has a plurality of fan blades secured in spaced-apart relationship about a rim section of the hub. The rim section is integrally connected to a central neck section through a web section. The rim section has an inwardly projecting annular channel formed in a leading edge thereof tuned to the 2M3ND mode of the fan blade hub and providing a reduction of airfoil stresses in the leading edge.
According to a still further aspect, there is provided a fan rotor for a gas turbine engine having a central axis, comprising a fan hub mounted for rotation about said central axis, and a plurality of fan blades circumferentially distributed about a radially outer surface of an outer rim section of said fan hub, said outer rim section being connected to an inner rim section through an axially facing web section, said web section extending from the outer rim section at a location axially aft of the center of gravity of the fan blades, and a ridge formation extending radially inwardly from the outer rim axially forward of the web section.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
As shown in
The fan hub 10 illustrated in
The concavature of the web section 15 is provided by a radially inner web portion 19, which is angled rearwardly in a radially outer direction away from the inner rim section 14 and merging into the outer rim section 13 through a generally radial and forwardly curved radially outer web or neck portion 20 which is disposed aft of the center of gravity 16 of the airfoil blades. Both the web portion 19 and the neck portion 20 have radial and axial components. The axial components of the web portion 19 and of the neck portion 20 extend in opposed directions. The radially inner web portion 19 merges into the forwardly curved radially outer neck portion 20 in a reinforced web region formed by an annular projecting ridge formation 21 projecting from a rear surface 22 of the web section 15. The central neck section 14 is disposed parallel to the centerline 23 of the gas turbine engine, as shown in
As better shown in
As better seen from
The above described embodiment provides a hub shape wherein the center of gravity of the hub is rearward relative to conventional hub designs. It can also be appreciated that the hub front end shaped is tuned to the 2M3ND mode to maintain the leading edge stresses low.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention disclosed. Modifications which fall within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/297,300, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2445661 | Constant et al. | Jul 1948 | A |
2928649 | Lombard et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3323710 | Daly | Jun 1967 | A |
3428244 | Palmer | Feb 1969 | A |
3869258 | Scott | Mar 1975 | A |
4313712 | Briggs | Feb 1982 | A |
4934904 | Kennedy | Jun 1990 | A |
5108261 | Ress, Jr. et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5281096 | Harris et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5370501 | Udall | Dec 1994 | A |
6019580 | Barr et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6077035 | Walters et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6354780 | Davis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6390775 | Paz | May 2002 | B1 |
6447252 | Barker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6511294 | Mielke et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6893222 | Allam | May 2005 | B2 |
7153102 | Stone | Dec 2006 | B2 |
RE39630 | Stangeland et al. | May 2007 | E |
7476080 | Sato et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20030223873 | Carrier | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050186080 | Chivers et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050254952 | Stone | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070020101 | Balamucki | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20120148401 | Kulathu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1209320 | May 2002 | EP |
Entry |
---|
EP Search Report issued in EP Publication No. 12192430 dated Nov. 8, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160040540 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13297300 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14921264 | US |