This invention relates particularly to fan rotors and, more particularly, to a fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence.
Present commercial engine configurations combine aerodynamic turning vanes and structural struts, used to support outer cases such as the fan containment case, into a single row of airfoils. This configuration utilizes a large number of airfoils relative to the fan blade count for acoustic reasons. With a high count of structural airfoils supporting the outer cases, a uniform stiffness is created at this engine axial station.
When a case is supported by a uniformly stiff structure, the case has the potential to exhibit vibratory modes with low to high nodal diameters. One or more of these vibratory modes may promote the potential for coincidence if they have the same frequency as an equivalent nodal diameter pattern on the rotor and the rotor is engaging the tip abradable system. Such an event is referred to as coincidence or a coincidence event. A coincidence event may occur if the energy transmission through rubbing continues to amplify the rotor to case interaction.
Conventional practice is to tune case modes out of the operating range by modifying the case thickness distribution or profile. This may be impractical for some modes, considering the weight addition required. In this situation, the standard approach to prevent coincidence is to open fan tip clearance. Opening fan tip clearance avoids the three hundred and sixty degree) (360° rubs, which can generate coincidence events. To avoid the potential for coincidence, fan tip clearances are opened up to prevent fan rubs greater than ninety degrees) (90°, that is, assuming difficult tolerance stack-up conditions and all potential field events. Typically, this tip clearance increase lowers fan blade efficiency by up to one percent (1%), increasing thrust specific fuel consumption by 0.5 to 0.6 percent, which significantly increases engine fuel burn.
Consequently, there exists a need for a fan rotor that addresses coincidence avoidance without sacrificing fan blade efficiency.
In accordance with the present invention, a fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence broadly comprises a fan hub broadly comprising one or more slots each designed to receive a fan blade; and one or more of the fan blades disposed within the slots, wherein one or more of the slots broadly comprises a radius RZ′ that corresponds to one or more second fan blades broadly comprising a second fan blade tip positioned at a distance farther from the fan hub than a first fan blade tip of one or more first fan blades disposed within one or more slots having a baseline RZ.
In accordance with the present invention, a fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence broadly comprises a fan hub broadly comprising one or more integrally disposed fan blades, wherein one or more of said integrally disposed fan blades broadly comprise one or more first fan blades broadly comprising a first fan blade tip position and one or more second fan blades broadly comprising a second fan blade tip position and said second fan blade tip position is at a farther distance from said fan hub than is said first fan blade tip position.
In accordance with the present invention, a fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence broadly comprises a fan hub broadly comprising one or more fan blades disposed therein, wherein one or more of said fan blades broadly comprise one or more first fan blades broadly comprising a first fan blade tip position and one or more second fan blades machined shortened to a second fan blade tip position and said first fan blade tip position is at a farther distance from said fan hub than said second fan blade tip position.
In accordance with the present invention, a fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence broadly comprises a fan hub comprising one or more slots capable of receiving one or more fan blades; and a fan platform disposed about a portion of one or more fan blades, wherein one or more fan blades fitted with the fan platform comprise a fan blade tip that projects outwardly at a distance farther from the fan hub than a fan blade tip of one or more fan blades without the fan platform.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
A first embodiment of fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence will generally comprises a fan hub comprising one or more slots, each designed to receive a fan blade. A portion of the slots will comprise a slot having characteristic radius from the engine centerline RZ whereas another portion of the slots will comprise a slot having a radius RZ′. The resulting difference (ΔRZ), with identical blades, will translate into a portion of the fan blades having a blade tip positioned at a distance farther from the fan hub, those blades disposed in slots having RZ′, than fan blade tips of the remaining fan blades disposed within slots having RZ. As a result, the second fan blade tips will make contact or rub with an abradable material disposed about the interior of the engine casing concentrically surrounding the engine and fan rotor.
Coincidence may occur when rotor and case vibratory modes have the same frequency, and there is a full circumferential rub. Energy is transmitted from the rotor to the case or vice versa during a rub. A full circumferential rub has the maximum energy transfer potential when all rotor blade to case clearances are uniform. An unstable coincidence event occurs when the full circumferential rub continues to increase the amplitude of rotor blade to case interaction. When employing one of the fan rotor embodiments described herein, the intermittent contact between the rotor blades and case minimizes the energy transfer. Accordingly, the rotor and case interaction amplitude will not amplify and a coincidence event will be avoided.
Referring generally to
Referring generally now to
ΔRZ=Rz−RZ′ (Equation 1)
where ΔRZ represents the radial difference between the shifted slot and the baseline slot within the Z plane. A portion of the slots, that is, slots 14, will comprise a slot having RZ whereas a portion of the slots, that is, slots 16, will comprise a slot having RZ′ with identical blades 20 and 22 (e.g., having the same lengths L′ and L from hub to tip). The resulting difference (ΔRZ) will translate into second fan blades 20 having a second blade tip 24 positioned at a distance farther from the centerline of the fan hub 12 than a first fan blade tip 26 of the first fan blades. As a result, the second fan blade tips will make contact, or rubs, with an abradable material 8 disposed about the interior of an engine casing (not shown) concentrically surrounding the engine (not shown) and fan rotor 10. The intermittent contact, or intermittent rubbing or simply “rubbing”, of the second fan blade tips with the abradable material will reduce the vibratory modes between the fan rotor 10 and engine casing. As a result, energy transmitted through rubbing will not amplify the interaction between the fan rotor and engine casing, and will reduce and/or avoid coincidence of all three vibratory frequencies.
Referring now to
In another alternative embodiment, a fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence will comprise a fan hub 50 (
In yet another alternative embodiment, a fan rotor capable of avoiding coincidence will comprise a fan hub comprising one or more fan blades disposed therein. One or more of the fan blades comprise one or more first fan blades comprising a first fan blade tip position, and one or more second fan blades machined shortened to a second fan blade tip position. The second fan blades will be machine shortened to a length that is less than a length of the first fan blades. As a result, the first fan blade tip positions will be at a distance farther from the fan hub than the second fan blade tip positions. Again, the first fan blade tips will rub the abradable material (not shown) disposed about the interior of an engine casing (not shown) concentrically surrounding the engine (not shown) and fan rotor. The intermittent contact, or intermittent rubbing or simply “rubbing”, of the first fan blade tips with the abradable material will reduce the vibratory modes between the fan rotor and engine casing. As a result, energy transmitted through rubbing will not amplify the interaction between the fan rotor and engine casing, and will reduce and/or avoid coincidence.
The fan rotors of the various embodiments described herein will not only prevent and/or avoid the potential for the coincidence of the vibratory frequency modes, but also improve turbine engine efficiency and performance. As described earlier, conventional practice to prevent coincidence is to fully open fan tip clearance. However, this practice results in lowered fan blade efficiency by up to one percent (1%), resulting in a 0.5 to 0.6 percent loss of thrust specific fuel consumption. In contrast, the fan rotors described herein will not require opening fan tip clearances. The estimated impact upon fan blade efficiency will be about 0.2 percent (0.2%). When compared to an actual loss of one percent, the fan rotors described herein provide a net gain of about 0.8 percent (0.8%) in fan blade efficiency.
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the illustrations described and shown herein, which are deemed to be merely illustrative of the best modes of carrying out the invention, and which are susceptible to modification of form, size, arrangement of parts, and details of operation. The invention rather is intended to encompass all such modifications which are within its spirit and scope as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2432315 | Howard | Dec 1947 | A |
2781998 | Barr | Feb 1957 | A |
2948506 | Glasser et al. | Aug 1960 | A |
3575530 | Hall | Apr 1971 | A |
3692429 | Redding | Sep 1972 | A |
4512718 | Stargardter | Apr 1985 | A |
4621979 | Zipps et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4688992 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5160242 | Brown | Nov 1992 | A |
6042388 | Tustaniwskyj et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6338609 | Decker et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6648602 | Horng et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7048507 | Wettstein et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20080134504 | Schoenenborn | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4439726 | May 1996 | DE |
2153447 | Aug 1985 | GB |
2225388 | May 1990 | GB |
54-32808 | Mar 1979 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070020101 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |