The invention concerns a support system, wherein a shroud surrounds a fan, and supports extend from the shroud to a motor which drives the fan. The support system provides an increased resonant frequency, thereby reducing the tendency of vibration produced by the fan to excite vibration in the shroud, particularly torsional vibration.
As discussed later in connection with
In the prior art, one approach to reducing the torsional vibration is to use struts, or stator vanes, of large cross-sectional area, one of which is shown in
However, the large cross-sectional profile area blocks airflow indicated by the arrows A3 in
In addition, these large profile struts cause a pressure disturbance that migrates upstream toward the fan blades. If the fan (not shown) is in close upstream proximity to the struts, as each fan blade (not shown) cuts through the pressure disturbance, a pressure pulse is generated. Consequently, the succession of fan blades cutting the disturbances creates a succession of pressure pulses, which is perceived as a siren-type noise. The tangential orientation of
A similar comment applies if the fan is downstream of the struts, wherein the fan blades successively cut the wakes of the struts.
Therefore, while struts of large cross-section can reduce torsional vibration, they cause pressure loss and noise.
Curved stator vanes can be used, as indicated by vane V2 in
This problem can be corrected, or reduced, by various cross-bracing schemes, as shown in
However, these cross-bracing schemes suffer some, or all, of the following problems. One problem is that they increase cost and add mass. In some cases, the cost increase is significant, as when the system is molded from plastic resin, because a more complex mold is then required.
Another problem is that the struts increase pressure loss, and the loss is worsened at the points of intersection between two struts.
Yet another problem is that, depending on the arrangement of the struts, they can interfere with the re-direction indicated in
An object of the invention is to provide an improved cooling fan.
A further object of the invention is to provide stator vanes which support a fan, which increase resonant frequency of the stator-vane-shroud structure.
In one form of the invention, groups of struts, or stator vanes, extend from a motor to a surrounding shroud. The groups contain non-radial struts, or stator vanes.
This discussion will first set forth phenomena which the Inventor has identified.
An example of the prior art is shown in
The Inventor has observed that a torsional mode of vibration can arise, which is illustrated in
During the torsional mode of vibration, the dot alternates between moving away from line L, in the direction of arrow A1, and then moving in the opposite direction, in the direction of arrow A2. The shroud oscillates between the two positions shown in the Figure. During the torsional vibration, the stator vanes 6 bend, as roughly indicated by their curvature.
One solution to reducing the torsional vibration is based on the analysis indicated in
Equation EQ 1 is a differential equation describing the system. The variable k is the spring constant of torsional spring 6A, which represents the spring-force applied by the stator vanes. Equation EQ 2 is derived from a known solution to EQ 1, and indicates the resonance frequency of the system, omega. Equation EQ 2 indicates that increasing k will increase the resonant frequency.
If the resonant frequency is increased beyond the range of frequencies produced by the rotating fan and the air flowing through the fan, then the latter two elements will fail to excite the shroud 3-spring 6A system, and the torsional vibration will be suppressed.
The prior art shown in
As indicated by the vector triangle T, arrow 30 can be broken into two components: axial AXL and tangential TL. The Inventor points out that AXL refers to the axis of the fan, not the axis AX in
One feature is that the vanes exist in groups. Groups of two and three are shown. Group G1 is a group of three vanes; group G2 is a group of two vanes.
One definition of “group” is based on proximity. For example, it could be said that vanes 100 and 101 form a “group,” on the grounds that they are adjacent each other, or for some other reason. However, under the invention, these vanes are not considered a group.
To determine grouping, spacing between adjacent vanes is first determined. Spacing may be measured in degrees, or in absolute distance, such as distance between radially outermost ends. However, spacings must be measured in reasonable ways. For example, the vane to vane gap associated with spacing SS1 may be similar to the vane to vane spacing gap SS2 in terms of absolute distance. However, the spacing in terms of an angular measurement scheme is very different.
The Inventor points out that the vanes in group G1 have spacing SS2 and SS3, which need not be equal. That spacing is less than the spacing SS4 between neighboring vanes 101 and 102 in the neighboring groups G1 and G2.
Another view of grouping is that vanes are bunched into clusters, which are clearly distinct from other clusters, and the distinction is apparent to the human eye. For example group G1 is clearly distinct from group G2.
A second feature is that the vanes in each group are shown as parallel, when viewed in cross section. In one form of the invention, the parallelism is preferred. In other forms of the invention, parallelism is not necessary.
A third feature is that, in each group, both radial and non-radial vanes are present. One definition of “radial” is aligned with a radius. For example, in group G1, vane 105 is radial, and vanes 102 and 107 are not radial. In group G2, vane 101 is radial, and vane 109 is not radial.
In one form of the invention, no radial vanes are present in a group. In another form of the invention, some radial vanes are present in groups. In another form of the invention, if a radial vane is present in a group, only one radial vane is present.
A fourth feature is that, no vanes which intersect with other vanes are present. Nor are inter-vane connectors present, as is the case shown in prior art
As triangle A-D1-B indicates, strut F will shorten during this displacement. That is, strut F is the hypotenuse of this triangle A-D1-B. That hypotenuse shortens as D1 moves to D2, and if the movement continued to point A, the hypotenuse would become a radius.
Vane G, a radial vane, can be viewed as bending, as indicated in
A similar triangle can be drawn for vane H, which will indicate that vane H lengthens, as
One. It was stated that, in
Two.
Whether vanes are parallel can be determined by comparing cross sections, as in
These concepts apply to determining whether a vane is radial.
Three. In one form of the invention, the fan-shroud system described herein is used in a vehicle. For example, the system can be used to cool the radiator which cools the engine.
Four. The spacing of the groups is, in general, arbitrary. For example,
Numerous substitutions and modifications can be undertaken without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. What is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2154313 | McMahan | Apr 1939 | A |
2219499 | Troller | Oct 1940 | A |
2397169 | Troller et al. | Mar 1946 | A |
3088695 | Clark | May 1963 | A |
3173604 | Sheets et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
4181172 | Longhouse | Jan 1980 | A |
4253800 | Segawa et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4329946 | Longhouse | May 1982 | A |
4358245 | Gray | Nov 1982 | A |
4474534 | Thode | Oct 1984 | A |
4548548 | Gray, III | Oct 1985 | A |
4569632 | Gray, III | Feb 1986 | A |
4692098 | Razinsky et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4840541 | Sakane et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5000660 | Van Houten et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5244347 | Gallivan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5320493 | Shih et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5326225 | Gallivan et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5342167 | Rosseau | Aug 1994 | A |
5399070 | Alizaden | Mar 1995 | A |
5513951 | Komoda et al. | May 1996 | A |
5577888 | Capdevila et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588804 | Neely et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5624234 | Neely et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5681145 | Neely et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
D386579 | Jane et al. | Nov 1997 | S |
5758716 | Shibata | Jun 1998 | A |
5769607 | Neely et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5810555 | Savage et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4326147 | Nov 1994 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060257252 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |