This application is a national stage application under 35 USC 371 of International Application No. PCT/GB2011/052109, filed Oct. 28, 2011, which claims the priority of United Kingdom Application No. 1020419.6, filed Dec. 2, 2010, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a fan for creating an air current in a room. Particularly, but not exclusively, the present invention relates to a floor or table-top fan, such as a desk, tower or pedestal fan.
A conventional domestic fan typically includes a set of blades or vanes mounted for rotation about an axis, and drive apparatus for rotating the set of blades to generate an air flow. The movement and circulation of the air flow creates a ‘wind chill’ or breeze and, as a result, the user experiences a cooling effect as heat is dissipated through convection and evaporation. The blades are generally located within a cage which allows an air flow to pass through the housing while preventing users from coming into contact with the rotating blades during use of the fan.
WO 2010/100448 describes a fan assembly which does not use caged blades to project air from the fan assembly. Instead, the fan assembly comprises a base which houses a motor-driven impeller for drawing a primary air flow into the base, and an annular nozzle connected to the base and comprising an annular slot through which the primary air flow is emitted from the fan. The nozzle defines a central opening through which air in the local environment of the fan assembly is drawn by the primary air flow emitted from the mouth, amplifying the primary air flow.
The impeller is in the form of a mixed flow impeller, which receives the primary air flow in an axial direction and emits the primary air flow in both axial and radial directions. The impeller comprises a generally conical hub and a plurality of blades connected to the hub. The impeller is located within an impeller housing mounted within the base of the fan. The leading edges of the blades of the impeller are located adjacent the air inlet of the impeller housing. The leading edges of the blades are rearwardly swept from the impeller hub to the blade tip. In other words, the leading edges of the blades extend rearwardly away from the air inlet of the impeller housing.
In a first aspect the present invention provides a fan for generating an air current within a room, the fan comprising a first casing comprising an air inlet through which an air flow is drawn into the fan, and a second casing connected to the first casing, the second casing comprising an air outlet from which the air flow is emitted from the fan, the first casing comprising an impeller housing having an air inlet and an air outlet, a mixed-flow impeller located within the impeller housing for drawing the air flow through the air inlet of the first casing, and a motor for driving the impeller, wherein the impeller comprises a substantially conical hub connected to the motor, and a plurality of blades connected to the hub, each blade comprising a leading edge located adjacent the air inlet of the impeller housing, a trailing edge, an inner side edge connected to and extending partially about the outer surface of the hub, an outer side edge located opposite to the inner side edge, and a blade tip located at the intersection of the leading edge and the outer side edge, and wherein the leading edge comprises an inner portion located adjacent the hub, and an outer portion located adjacent the blade tip, and wherein the inner portion is swept rearwardly from the hub to the outer portion, and the outer portion is swept forwardly from the inner portion to the blade tip.
The impeller differs from that described in WO 2010/100448 by way of the leading edge of each blade comprising an inner portion located adjacent the hub, and an outer portion located adjacent the blade tip. The inner portion is swept rearwardly from the hub to the outer portion, that is, away from the air inlet of the impeller housing, whereas the outer portion is swept forwardly from the inner portion to the blade tip, that is, towards the air inlet of the impeller housing.
This modification to the shape of the leading edge can reduce the noise generated during use of the fan in comparison to the impeller of WO 2010/100448. The localised forward sweep of the leading edge of each blade towards the blade tip can reduce the peak hub-to-tip loading of the blades, which peak is located generally at or towards the leading edges of the blades. Hub-to-tip loading is a method of analysing pressure gradients across the blade, and can be defined as:
where Wt is the relative velocity of the flow at the blade tip and Wh is the relative velocity of the flow at the hub. We have found that forward sweeping the leading edge of each blade can reduce the pressure gradient across the leading edge, reducing flow separation from the blade and thereby reducing noise associated with air turbulence.
However, a fully swept leading edge, that is, a leading edge which is swept forwardly from the hub to the blade tip, can increase blade-to-blade loading at the leading edge of the blade. Blade-to-blade loading is a method of analysing pressure gradients along the blade, and can be defined as:
where Wss is the relative velocity of the flow at the suction side of the blade and Wps is the relative velocity of the flow at the pressure side of the blade. We have found that the blade-to-blade loading at the leading edge of the blade can be reduced by increasing the length of the inner side edge of the blade so that the length of the inner side edge approaches that of the outer side edge, resulting in the inner portion of the leading edge being swept rearwardly from the hub to the outer portion.
Preferably, the inner portion of the leading edge extends within a range from 30 to 80%, more preferably within a range from 50 to 70%, of the length of the leading edge.
The inner portion of the leading edge is preferably convex, whereas the outer portion of the leading edge is preferably concave. However, at least part of each portion of the leading edge may be straight. For example, the inner portion of the leading edge may be straight.
Blade-to-blade loading along the length of the blade may be optimised by controlling the lean angle of each blade, that is, the angle subtended between the blade and a plane extending radially outwardly from the hub. Each blade preferably has a lean angle which varies along the length of the blade. The lean angle preferably varies between a maximum value adjacent the leading edge of the blade, and a minimum value adjacent the trailing edge of the blade. The maximum value of the lean angle is preferably positive, that is, the blade leans forward in the direction of rotation of the impeller, whereas the minimum value of the lean angle is preferably negative, that is, the blade leans backward away from the direction of rotation of the impeller. The maximum value of the lean angle is preferably in the range from 15 to 30°, and the minimum value of the lean angle is preferably in the range from −20 to −30°. The lean angle is preferably at a value of 0° at or around a part of the blade which is midway between the leading edge and the trailing edge of the blade.
The width of the blade preferably decreases gradually from the leading edge to the trailing edge. The thickness of the blade preferably also varies between a maximum value and a minimum value. The minimum value of the thickness of the blade is preferably located at the trailing edge to optimise the aerodynamic performance of the blade. The maximum value of the thickness of the blade is preferably located midway between the leading edge and the trailing edge, and this maximum value is preferably in the range from 0.9 to 1.1 mm. The trailing edge is preferably straight.
Each blade preferably extends about the hub by an angle in the range from 60 to 120°.
The number of blades is preferably in the range from six to twelve.
To increase the stiffness of the impeller, the impeller may comprise a generally frusto-conical shroud connected to the outer side edge of each blade so as to surround the hub and the blades. The provision of the shroud also prevents the blade tips from coming into contact with the impeller housing in the event that the impeller becomes mis-aligned with the impeller housing during use.
The second casing preferably extends about an opening through which air from outside the second casing is drawn by the air flow emitted from the mouth. Preferably, the second casing surrounds the opening. The second casing may be an annular second casing which preferably has a height in the range from 200 to 600 mm, more preferably in the range from 250 to 500 mm.
Preferably, the mouth of the second casing extends about the opening, and is preferably annular. The second casing may comprise an inner casing section and an outer casing section which define the mouth of the second casing. Each section is preferably formed from a respective annular member, but each section may be provided by a plurality of members connected together or otherwise assembled to form that section. The outer casing section may be shaped so as to partially overlap the inner casing section. This can enable an outlet of the mouth to be defined between overlapping portions of the external surface of the inner casing section and the internal surface of the outer casing section of the second casing.
The outlet is preferably in the form of a slot, preferably having a width in the range from 0.5 to 5 mm, more preferably in the range from 0.5 to 2 mm. The second casing may comprise a plurality of spacers for urging apart the overlapping portions of the inner casing section and the outer casing section of the second casing. This can assist in maintaining a substantially uniform outlet width about the opening. The spacers are preferably evenly spaced along the outlet.
The second casing preferably comprises an interior passage for receiving the air flow from the stand. The interior passage is preferably annular, and is preferably shaped to divide the air flow into two air streams which flow in opposite directions around the opening. The interior passage is preferably also defined by the inner casing section and the outer casing section of the second casing.
The second casing may comprise a surface, preferably a Coanda surface, located adjacent the mouth and over which the mouth is arranged to direct the air flow emitted therefrom. Preferably, the external surface of the inner casing section of the second casing is shaped to define the Coanda surface. The Coanda surface preferably extends about the opening. A Coanda surface is a known type of surface over which fluid flow exiting an output orifice close to the surface exhibits the Coanda effect. The fluid tends to flow over the surface closely, almost ‘clinging to’ or ‘hugging’ the surface. The Coanda effect is already a proven, well documented method of entrainment in which a primary air flow is directed over a Coanda surface. A description of the features of a Coanda surface, and the effect of fluid flow over a Coanda surface, can be found in articles such as Reba, Scientific American, Volume 214, June 1966 pages 84 to 92. Through use of a Coanda surface, an increased amount of air from outside the fan assembly is drawn through the opening by the air emitted from the mouth.
Preferably, an air flow enters the second casing of the fan assembly from the first casing. In the following description this air flow will be referred to as primary air flow. The primary air flow is emitted from the mouth of the second casing and preferably passes over a Coanda surface. The primary air flow entrains air surrounding the mouth of the second casing, which acts as an air amplifier to supply both the primary air flow and the entrained air to the user. The entrained air will be referred to here as a secondary air flow. The secondary air flow is drawn from the room space, region or external environment surrounding the mouth of the second casing and, by displacement, from other regions around the fan assembly, and passes predominantly through the opening defined by the second casing. The primary air flow directed over the Coanda surface combined with the entrained secondary air flow equates to a total air flow emitted or projected forward from the opening defined by the second casing. Preferably, the entrainment of air surrounding the mouth of the second casing is such that the primary air flow is amplified by at least five times, more preferably by at least ten times, while a smooth overall output is maintained.
Preferably, the second casing comprises a diffuser surface located downstream of the Coanda surface. The external surface of the inner casing section of the second casing is preferably shaped to define the diffuser surface.
The impeller may be provided in isolation from the remaining features of the fan, for example for replacement of an existing impeller, and so in a second aspect the present invention provides an impeller, preferably for a fan, comprising a substantially conical hub, and a plurality of blades connected to the hub, each blade comprising a leading edge, a trailing edge, an inner side edge connected to and extending partially about the outer surface of the hub, an outer side edge located opposite to the inner side edge, and a blade tip located at the intersection of the leading edge and the outer side edge, and wherein the leading edge comprises an inner portion located adjacent the hub, and an outer portion located adjacent the blade tip, and wherein the inner portion is swept rearwardly from the hub to the outer portion, and the outer portion is swept forwardly from the inner portion to the blade tip.
Features described above in connection with the first aspect of the invention are equally applicable to the second aspect of the invention, and vice versa.
Preferred features of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
As also shown in
The outer casing section 28 and the inner casing section 30 together define an annular interior passage 35 (shown in
The air outlet 20 is located towards the rear of the upper casing 18, and is arranged to emit the primary air flow towards the front of the fan 10, through the opening 32. The air outlet 20 extends at least partially about the opening 32, and preferably surrounds the opening 32. The air outlet 20 is defined by overlapping, or facing, portions of the internal surface of the outer casing section 28 and the external surface of the inner casing section 30, respectively, and is in the form of an annular slot, preferably having a relatively constant width in the range from 0.5 to 5 mm. In this example the air outlet has a width of around 1 mm. Spacers may be spaced about the air outlet 20 for urging apart the overlapping portions of the outer casing section 28 and the inner casing section 30 to maintain the width of the air outlet 20 at the desired level. These spacers may be integral with either the outer casing section 28 or the inner casing section 30.
The air outlet 20 is shaped to direct the primary air flow over the external surface of the inner casing section 30. The external surface of the inner casing section 30 comprises a Coanda surface 36 located adjacent the air outlet 20 and over which the air outlet 20 directs the air emitted from the fan 10, a diffuser surface 38 located downstream of the Coanda surface 36 and a guide surface 40 located downstream of the diffuser surface 38. The diffuser surface 38 is arranged to taper away from the central axis X of the opening 32 in such a way so as to assist the flow of air emitted from the fan 10. The angle subtended between the diffuser surface 38 and the central axis X of the opening 32 is in the range from 5 to 25°, and in this example is around 15°. The guide surface 40 is angled inwardly relative to the diffuser surface 38 to channel the air flow back towards the central axis X. The guide surface 40 is preferably arranged substantially parallel to the central axis X of the opening 32 to present a substantially flat and substantially smooth face to the air flow emitted from the air outlet 20. A visually appealing tapered surface 42 is located downstream from the guide surface 40, terminating at a tip surface 44 lying substantially perpendicular to the central axis X of the opening 32. The angle subtended between the tapered surface 42 and the central axis X of the opening 32 is preferably around 45°.
The main body section 50 comprises the air inlet 14 through which the primary air flow enters the fan assembly 10. In this embodiment the air inlet 14 comprises an array of apertures formed in the main body section 50. Alternatively, the air inlet 14 may comprise one or more grilles or meshes mounted within windows formed in the main body section 50. The main body section 50 is open at the upper end (as illustrated) thereof to provide an air outlet 54 through which the primary air flow is exhausted from the body 12.
The main body section 50 may be tilted relative to the lower body section 52 to adjust the direction in which the primary air flow is emitted from the fan assembly 10. For example, the upper surface of the lower body section 52 and the lower surface of the main body section 50 may be provided with interconnecting features which allow the main body section 50 to move relative to the lower body section 52 while preventing the main body section 50 from being lifted from the lower body section 52. For example, the lower body section 52 and the main body section 50 may comprise interlocking L-shaped members.
The lower body section 52 is mounted on a base 56 for engaging a surface on which the fan assembly 10 is located. The lower body section 52 comprises the aforementioned user interface and a control circuit, indicated generally at 58, for controlling various functions of the fan 10 in response to operation of the user interface. The lower body section 52 also houses a mechanism for oscillating the lower body section 52 relative to the base 56. The operation of the oscillation mechanism is controlled by the control circuit 58 in response to the user's depression of the button 24 of the user interface. The range of each oscillation cycle of the lower body section 52 relative to the base 56 is preferably between 60° and 120°, and the oscillation mechanism is arranged to perform around 3 to 5 oscillation cycles per minute. A mains power cable (not shown) for supplying electrical power to the fan 10 extends through an aperture formed in the base 56.
The main body section 50 houses an impeller 60 for drawing the primary air flow through the air inlet 14 and into the body 12. The impeller 60 is a mixed flow impeller. The impeller 60 is connected to a rotary shaft 62 extending outwardly from a motor 64. In this embodiment, the motor 64 is a DC brushless motor having a speed which is variable by the control circuit 58 in response to user manipulation of the dial 26. The maximum speed of the motor 64 is preferably in the range from 5,000 to 10,000 rpm.
With reference also to
The motor housing is supported within the main body section 50 by an impeller housing 72. The diffuser 70 comprises an outer annular member 74 which extends about the blades of the diffuser 70, and which is integral with the upper section 68 of the motor housing. The annular member 74 is supported by an annular support surface 76 located on an inner surface of the impeller housing 72.
The impeller housing 72 is generally frusto-conical in shape, and comprises a circular air inlet 78 at the relatively small, lower end thereof (as illustrated) for receiving the primary air flow, and an annular air outlet 80 at the relatively large, upper end thereof (as illustrated), and within which the diffuser 70 is located when the motor housing is supported within the impeller housing 72. An annular inlet member 82 is connected to the outer surface of the impeller housing 72 for guiding the primary air flow towards the air inlet 78 of the impeller housing 72.
The impeller 60 comprises a generally conical hub 84, a plurality of impeller blades 86 connected to the hub 84, and a generally frusto-conical shroud 88 connected to the blades 86 so as to surround the hub 84 and the blades 86. The blades 86 are preferably integral with the hub 84, which is preferably formed from plastics material. The thickness x1 of the hub 84 is in the range from 1 to 3 mm. The hub 84 has a conical inner surface which has a similar shape to that of the outer surface of the lower section 66 of the motor housing. The hub 84 is spaced from the motor housing by a distance x2 which is also in the range from 1 to 3 mm.
The hub 84 and the blades 86 of the impeller 60 are illustrated in more detail in
The length of each side edge 90, 92 is greater than the lengths of the leading edge 94 and the trailing edge 96. The length of the outer side edge 92 is preferably in the range from 70 to 90 mm, and in this example is around 80 mm. The length of the leading edge 94 is preferably in the range from 15 to 30 mm, and in this example is around 20 mm. The length of the trailing edge 96 is preferably in the range from 5 to 15 mm, and in this example is around 10 mm. The width of the blade 86 decreases gradually from the leading edge 94 to the trailing edge 96.
The trailing edge 96 of each blade 86 is preferably straight. The leading edge 94 of each blade 86 comprises an inner portion 100 located adjacent the hub 84, and an outer portion 102 located adjacent the blade tip 98. The inner portion 100 of the leading edge 94 extends within a range from 30 to 80% of the length of the leading edge 94. In this example the inner portion 100 is longer than the outer portion 102, extending within a range from 50 to 70% of the length of the leading edge 94.
The shape of the blades 86 is designed to minimise noise generated during the rotation of the impeller 64 by reducing pressure gradients across parts of the blades 86. The reduction of these pressure gradients can reduce the tendency for the primary air flow to separate from the blades 86, and thus reduce turbulence within the air flow.
The outer portion 102 of the leading edge 94 is swept forwardly from the inner portion 100 to the blade tip 98. This localised forward sweep of the leading edge 94 of each blade 86 towards the blade tip 98 can reduce the peak hub-to-tip loading of the blades 86. The outer portion 102 is concave in shape, curving forwardly from the inner portion 100 to the blade tip 98. To reduce blade-to-blade loading of the blades 86, the inner portion 100 is swept rearwardly from the hub 86 to the outer portion 102 so that the length of the inner side edge 90 approaches that of the outer side edge 92. In this example the inner portion 100 of the leading edge 94 is convex in shape, curving rearwardly from the hub 84 to the outer portion 102 of the leading edge 94 to maximise the length of the inner side edge 90.
Blade-to-blade loading along the length of each blade 86 is reduced by controlling the lean angle of each blade 86, that is, the angle subtended between the blade 86 and a plane extending radially outwardly from the hub 84. Each blade 86 has a lean angle which varies along the length of the blade 86 from a maximum value adjacent the leading edge 94 of the blade 86 to a minimum value adjacent the trailing edge 96 of the blade 86. The lean angle is preferably positive at the leading edge 94 so that the blade 86 leans forward in the direction of rotation of the impeller 60 at the leading edge 94, whereas the lean angle is preferably negative at the trailing edge 96 so that the blade 86 leans backward away from the direction of rotation of the impeller 60. This is illustrated in
To minimise blade-to-blade loading at the trailing edge 96 of each blade 86, the thickness of the blade is preferably at a minimum value at the trailing edge 96. The maximum value of the thickness of the blade 86 is preferably located midway between the leading edge 94 and the trailing edge 96, and this maximum value is preferably in the range from 0.9 to 1.1 mm. In this example, this maximum value is around 1 mm. The minimum thickness is preferably in the range from 0.2 to 0.8 mm. The thickness of the blade 86 at the leading edge 94 is preferably between these maximum and minimum values. The variation in the thickness of the blades 86 along their length can be seen in
Returning to
Preferably, the body 12 includes silencing foam for reducing noise emissions from the body 12. In this embodiment, the main body section 50 of the body 12 comprises a first foam member 114 located beneath the air inlet 14, and a second annular foam member 116 located within the motor bucket.
To operate the fan 10 the user presses button 22 of the user interface, in response to which the control circuit 58 activates the motor 64 to rotate the impeller 60. The rotation of the impeller 60 causes a primary air flow to be drawn into the body 12 through the air inlet 14. The user may control the speed of the motor 64, and therefore the rate at which air is drawn into the body 12 through the air inlet 14, by manipulating the dial 26. Depending on the speed of the motor 64, the primary air flow generated by the impeller 60 may be between 20 and 30 liters per second. The primary air flow passes sequentially through the impeller housing 72, and through the diffuser 70, before passing through the air outlet 54 of the body 12 and into the upper casing 18. The pressure of the primary air flow at the air outlet 54 of the body 12 may be at least 150 Pa, and is preferably in the range from 250 to 1.5 kPa.
Within the upper casing 18, the primary air flow is divided into two air streams which pass in opposite directions around the opening 32 of the casing 14. As the air streams pass through the interior passage 35, air is emitted through the air outlet 20. The primary air flow emitted from the air outlet 20 is directed over the Coanda surface 36 of the upper casing 18, causing a secondary air flow to be generated by the entrainment of air from the external environment, specifically from the region around the air outlet 20 and from around the rear of the upper casing 18. This secondary air flow passes through the central opening 32 of the upper casing 18, where it combines with the primary air flow to produce a total air flow, or air current, projected forward from the upper casing 18.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1020419.6 | Dec 2010 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2011/052109 | 10/28/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/17/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/072996 | 6/7/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1357261 | Svoboda | Nov 1920 | A |
1767060 | Ferguson | Jun 1930 | A |
1896869 | Larsh | Feb 1933 | A |
2014185 | Martin | Sep 1935 | A |
2035733 | Wall | Mar 1936 | A |
D103476 | Weber | Mar 1937 | S |
2115883 | Sher | May 1938 | A |
D115344 | Chapman | Jun 1939 | S |
2210458 | Keilholtz | Aug 1940 | A |
2258961 | Saathoff | Oct 1941 | A |
2336295 | Reimuller | Dec 1943 | A |
2433795 | Stokes | Dec 1947 | A |
2473325 | Aufiero | Jun 1949 | A |
2476002 | Stalker | Jul 1949 | A |
2488467 | De Lisio | Nov 1949 | A |
2510132 | Morrison | Jun 1950 | A |
2544379 | Davenport | Mar 1951 | A |
2547448 | Demuth | Apr 1951 | A |
2583374 | Hoffman | Jan 1952 | A |
2620127 | Radcliffe | Dec 1952 | A |
2765977 | Morrison | Oct 1956 | A |
2808198 | Morrison | Oct 1957 | A |
2813673 | Smith | Nov 1957 | A |
2830779 | Wentling | Apr 1958 | A |
2838229 | Belanger | Jun 1958 | A |
2922277 | Bertin | Jan 1960 | A |
2922570 | Allen | Jan 1960 | A |
3004403 | Laporte | Oct 1961 | A |
3047208 | Coanda | Jul 1962 | A |
3270655 | Guirl et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
D206973 | De Lisio | Feb 1967 | S |
3339867 | Bayless | Sep 1967 | A |
3444817 | Caldwell | May 1969 | A |
3503138 | Fuchs et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3518776 | Wolff et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3724092 | McCleerey | Apr 1973 | A |
3743186 | Mocarski | Jul 1973 | A |
3795367 | Mocarski | Mar 1974 | A |
3872916 | Beck | Mar 1975 | A |
3875745 | Franklin | Apr 1975 | A |
3885891 | Throndson | May 1975 | A |
3943329 | Hlavac | Mar 1976 | A |
4037991 | Taylor | Jul 1977 | A |
4046492 | Inglis | Sep 1977 | A |
4061188 | Beck | Dec 1977 | A |
4073613 | Desty | Feb 1978 | A |
4113416 | Kataoka et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4136735 | Beck et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4173995 | Beck | Nov 1979 | A |
4180130 | Beck et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4184541 | Beck et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4192461 | Arborg | Mar 1980 | A |
4332529 | Alperin | Jun 1982 | A |
4336017 | Desty | Jun 1982 | A |
4342204 | Melikian et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4448354 | Reznick et al. | May 1984 | A |
4502837 | Blair et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4568243 | Schubert et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4630475 | Mizoguchi | Dec 1986 | A |
4643351 | Fukamachi et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4653976 | Blair | Mar 1987 | A |
4703152 | Shih-Chin | Oct 1987 | A |
4718870 | Watts | Jan 1988 | A |
4732539 | Shin-Chin | Mar 1988 | A |
4737077 | Vera | Apr 1988 | A |
4790133 | Stuart | Dec 1988 | A |
4850804 | Huang | Jul 1989 | A |
4878620 | Tarleton | Nov 1989 | A |
4893990 | Tomohiro et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4978281 | Conger | Dec 1990 | A |
5061405 | Stanek et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
D325435 | Coup et al. | Apr 1992 | S |
5168722 | Brock | Dec 1992 | A |
5176856 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5188508 | Scott et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5296769 | Havens et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5310313 | Chen | May 1994 | A |
5317815 | Hwang | Jun 1994 | A |
5402938 | Sweeney | Apr 1995 | A |
5407324 | Starnes, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425902 | Miller et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5518370 | Wang et al. | May 1996 | A |
5609473 | Litvin | Mar 1997 | A |
5645769 | Tamaru et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649370 | Russo | Jul 1997 | A |
5685696 | Zangeneh | Nov 1997 | A |
5730582 | Heitmann | Mar 1998 | A |
5735683 | Muschelknautz | Apr 1998 | A |
5762034 | Foss | Jun 1998 | A |
5762661 | Kleinberger et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783117 | Byassee et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
D398983 | Keller et al. | Sep 1998 | S |
5841080 | Iida et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843344 | Junket et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862037 | Behl | Jan 1999 | A |
5868197 | Potier | Feb 1999 | A |
5881685 | Foss et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
D415271 | Feer | Oct 1999 | S |
6015274 | Bias et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6056518 | Allen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065936 | Shingai et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073881 | Chen | Jun 2000 | A |
6082969 | Carroll et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
D429808 | Krauss et al. | Aug 2000 | S |
6123618 | Day | Sep 2000 | A |
6155782 | Hsu | Dec 2000 | A |
D435899 | Melwani | Jan 2001 | S |
6254337 | Arnold | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269549 | Carlucci et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278248 | Hong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282746 | Schleeter | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293121 | Labrador | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6321034 | Jones-Lawlor et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6338610 | Harada et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348106 | Embree et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6386845 | Bedard | May 2002 | B1 |
6454527 | Nishiyama et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6480672 | Rosenzweig et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6511288 | Gatley, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6599088 | Stagg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
D485895 | Melwani | Jan 2004 | S |
6709236 | Hoelzer | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752711 | Yeung | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6789787 | Stutts | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830433 | Birdsell et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7059826 | Lasko | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7088913 | Verhoorn et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7147336 | Chou | Dec 2006 | B1 |
D539414 | Russak et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
7186075 | Winkler et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7189053 | Winkler et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7241214 | Sixsmith | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7317267 | Schmid et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7455504 | Hill et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478993 | Hong et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7540474 | Huang et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
D598532 | Dyson et al. | Aug 2009 | S |
D602143 | Gammack et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
D602144 | Dyson et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
D605748 | Gammack et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
7664377 | Liao | Feb 2010 | B2 |
D614280 | Dyson et al. | Apr 2010 | S |
7775848 | Auerbach | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7806388 | Junkel et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7921962 | Liddell | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8033783 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8092166 | Nicolas et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8430624 | Cookson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8469658 | Gammack et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020015640 | Nishiyama et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020106547 | Sugawara et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030059307 | Moreno et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030171093 | Gumucio Del Pozo | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030228226 | Higashimori | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022631 | Birdsell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049842 | Prehodka | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040149881 | Allen | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050031448 | Lasko et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053465 | Roach et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069407 | Winkler et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050128698 | Huang | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132529 | Davidshofer | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163670 | Alleyne et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050173997 | Schmid et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050276684 | Huang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050281672 | Parker et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060172682 | Orr et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199515 | Lasko et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070035189 | Matsumoto | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041857 | Fleig | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048159 | DiMatteo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059179 | Xu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065280 | Fok | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070166160 | Russak et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176502 | Kasai et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070224044 | Hong et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070269323 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080020698 | Spaggiari | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080152482 | Patel | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080166224 | Giffin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080286130 | Purvines | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080304986 | Kenyon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314250 | Cowie et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090026850 | Fu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039805 | Tang | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060710 | Gammack et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060711 | Gammack et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090191054 | Winkler | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090214341 | Craig | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100150699 | Nicolas et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162011 | Min | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171465 | Seal et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189557 | Broom | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100219013 | Liddell | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100225012 | Fitton et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226749 | Gammack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226750 | Gammack | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226751 | Gammack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226752 | Gammack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226753 | Dyson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226754 | Hutton et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226758 | Cookson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226763 | Gammack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226764 | Gammack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226769 | Helps | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226771 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226787 | Gammack et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226797 | Fitton et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226801 | Gammack | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254800 | Fitton et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110002775 | Ma et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110058935 | Gammack et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110097194 | Schick et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110110805 | Gammack et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110164959 | Fitton et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110223014 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223015 | Gammack et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120031509 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120033952 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034108 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039705 | Gammack | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045315 | Gammack | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045316 | Gammack | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120057959 | Hodgson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120082561 | Gammack et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120093629 | Fitton et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120093630 | Fitton et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120114513 | Simmonds et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120230658 | Fitton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130011252 | Crawford et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130045084 | Tu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130189083 | Atkinson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130309065 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130309066 | Atkinson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130309080 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130323025 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140017069 | Peters | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201100923 | Sep 2011 | AU |
560119 | Aug 1957 | BE |
1055344 | May 1979 | CA |
2155482 | Sep 1996 | CA |
346643 | May 1960 | CH |
2085866 | Oct 1991 | CN |
2111392 | Jul 1992 | CN |
2228996 | Jun 1996 | CN |
1232143 | Oct 1999 | CN |
1288506 | Mar 2001 | CN |
1336482 | Feb 2002 | CN |
1437300 | Aug 2003 | CN |
2650005 | Oct 2004 | CN |
2713643 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1680727 | Oct 2005 | CN |
2833197 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101046318 | Oct 2007 | CN |
201180678 | Jan 2009 | CN |
201221477 | Apr 2009 | CN |
201281416 | Jul 2009 | CN |
201349269 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101749288 | Jun 2010 | CN |
201502549 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101816534 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101825095 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101825102 | Sep 2010 | CN |
201568337 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101936310 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101984299 | Mar 2011 | CN |
101985948 | Mar 2011 | CN |
201763705 | Mar 2011 | CN |
201763706 | Mar 2011 | CN |
201770513 | Mar 2011 | CN |
201779080 | Mar 2011 | CN |
201802648 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102095236 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102305220 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102367813 | Mar 2012 | CN |
202165330 | Mar 2012 | CN |
1 291 090 | Mar 1969 | DE |
24 51 557 | May 1976 | DE |
27 48 724 | May 1978 | DE |
3644567 | Jul 1988 | DE |
41 27 134 | Feb 1993 | DE |
195 10 397 | Sep 1996 | DE |
197 12 228 | Oct 1998 | DE |
100 00 400 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10041805 | Jun 2002 | DE |
10 2009 007 037 | Aug 2010 | DE |
10 2009 044 349 | May 2011 | DE |
0 044 494 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0186581 | Jul 1986 | EP |
0 837 245 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 955 469 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1 094 224 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 138 954 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 566 548 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 779 745 | May 2007 | EP |
1 939 456 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1 980 432 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2 000 675 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2191142 | Jun 2010 | EP |
1033034 | Jul 1953 | FR |
1119439 | Jun 1956 | FR |
1387334 | Jan 1965 | FR |
2 534 983 | Apr 1984 | FR |
2 640 857 | Jun 1990 | FR |
2 658 593 | Aug 1991 | FR |
2794195 | Dec 2000 | FR |
2 874 409 | Feb 2006 | FR |
2 906 980 | Apr 2008 | FR |
22235 | Jun 1914 | GB |
383498 | Nov 1932 | GB |
593828 | Oct 1947 | GB |
601222 | Apr 1948 | GB |
633273 | Dec 1949 | GB |
641622 | Aug 1950 | GB |
661747 | Nov 1951 | GB |
863 124 | Mar 1961 | GB |
1067956 | May 1967 | GB |
1 262 131 | Feb 1972 | GB |
1 265 341 | Mar 1972 | GB |
1 278 606 | Jun 1972 | GB |
1 304 560 | Jan 1973 | GB |
1 403 188 | Aug 1975 | GB |
1 434 226 | May 1976 | GB |
1 501 473 | Feb 1978 | GB |
2 094 400 | Sep 1982 | GB |
2 107 787 | May 1983 | GB |
2 111 125 | Jun 1983 | GB |
2 178 256 | Feb 1987 | GB |
2 185 531 | Jul 1987 | GB |
2 185 533 | Jul 1987 | GB |
2 218 196 | Nov 1989 | GB |
2 236 804 | Apr 1991 | GB |
2 237 323 | May 1991 | GB |
2 240 268 | Jul 1991 | GB |
2 242 935 | Oct 1991 | GB |
2 285 504 | Jul 1995 | GB |
2 289 087 | Nov 1995 | GB |
2383277 | Jun 2003 | GB |
2 428 569 | Feb 2007 | GB |
2 452 490 | Mar 2009 | GB |
2 452 593 | Mar 2009 | GB |
2463698 | Mar 2010 | GB |
2464736 | Apr 2010 | GB |
2466058 | Jun 2010 | GB |
2468312 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468313 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468315 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468319 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468320 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468323 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468328 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468331 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2468369 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2473037 | Mar 2011 | GB |
2479760 | Oct 2011 | GB |
2482547 | Feb 2012 | GB |
31-13055 | Aug 1956 | JP |
35-4369 | Mar 1960 | JP |
39-7297 | Mar 1964 | JP |
49-150403 | Dec 1974 | JP |
51-7258 | Jan 1976 | JP |
53-51608 | May 1978 | JP |
53-60100 | May 1978 | JP |
56-167897 | Dec 1981 | JP |
57-71000 | May 1982 | JP |
57-157097 | Sep 1982 | JP |
59-90797 | May 1984 | JP |
59-167984 | Nov 1984 | JP |
60-105896 | Jul 1985 | JP |
61-31830 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-116093 | Jun 1986 | JP |
61-280787 | Dec 1986 | JP |
62-223494 | Oct 1987 | JP |
63-179198 | Jul 1988 | JP |
63-306340 | Dec 1988 | JP |
64-21300 | Feb 1989 | JP |
64-83884 | Mar 1989 | JP |
1-138399 | May 1989 | JP |
1-224598 | Sep 1989 | JP |
2-146294 | Jun 1990 | JP |
2-211400 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2-218890 | Aug 1990 | JP |
2-248690 | Oct 1990 | JP |
3-3419 | Jan 1991 | JP |
3-52515 | May 1991 | JP |
3-267598 | Nov 1991 | JP |
4-43895 | Feb 1992 | JP |
4-366330 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5-157093 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5-164089 | Jun 1993 | JP |
5-263786 | Oct 1993 | JP |
6-74190 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-86898 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-147188 | May 1994 | JP |
6-257591 | Sep 1994 | JP |
6-280800 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-336113 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7-190443 | Jul 1995 | JP |
7-247991 | Sep 1995 | JP |
8-21400 | Jan 1996 | JP |
9-100800 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9-287600 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10-122188 | May 1998 | JP |
11-227866 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2000-116179 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-201723 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001-17358 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-140796 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-295785 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-21797 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-138829 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-213388 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-371998 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-329273 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-8275 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004-208935 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-216221 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005-201507 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005-307985 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006-89096 | Apr 2006 | JP |
3127331 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007-92697 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-138763 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007-138789 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-39316 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008-100204 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-151081 | Jul 2008 | JP |
3146538 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008-294243 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009-44568 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-264121 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-131259 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2012-36897 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012-57619 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2002-0061691 | Jul 2002 | KR |
2002-0067468 | Aug 2002 | KR |
10-2005-0102317 | Oct 2005 | KR |
2007-0007997 | Jan 2007 | KR |
10-2010-0055611 | May 2010 | KR |
2000-0032363 | Jun 2010 | KR |
10-0985378 | Sep 2010 | KR |
M394383 | Dec 2010 | TW |
M407299 | Jul 2011 | TW |
WO-9013478 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO-02073096 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO-03058795 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03069931 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO-2005050026 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005057091 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2006008021 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2006012526 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2007024955 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007048205 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2008014641 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2008024569 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2009030879 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2009030881 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2010100448 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2010100451 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2010100452 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2010100453 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2010100462 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2011055134 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Atkinson, U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2015, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/743,975; 8 pages. |
Atkinson et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2015, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/895,691; 11 pages. |
Johnson et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Feb. 12, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/895,667; 13 pages. |
Johnson et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Feb. 12, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/895,690; 14 pages. |
Search Report dated Mar. 23, 2011, directed to GB Application No. 1020419.6; 1 page. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 7, 2012, directed to International Application No. PCT/GB2011/052109; 12 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 9, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/203,698; 10 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/203,698; 11 pages. |
Gammack et al., Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/114,707; 12 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 10, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/230,613; 12 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed May 13, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/230,613; 13 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/230,613; 15 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/230,613; 15 pages. |
Gammack et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/945,558; 15 pages. |
Fitton et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 30, 2010 directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/560,232; 9 pages. |
Nicolas, F. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Mar. 7, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,844; 10 pages. |
Nicolas, F. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 8, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,844; 11 pages. |
Fitton, et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Mar. 8, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,780; 12 pages. |
Fitton, et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 6, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,780; 16 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 9, 2010, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,781; 17 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Final Office Action mailed Jun. 24, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,781; 19 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 29, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,742; 9 pages. |
Cookson, M. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,778; 8 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,749; 8 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 1, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,749; 9 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,749; 11 pages. |
Fitton et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2012, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,707; 7 pages. |
Gammack, P. et al., U.S. Office Action mailed May 24, 2011, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 12/716,613; 9 pages. |
Reba, I. (1966). “Applications of the Coanda Effect,” Scientific American 214:84-92. |
Third Party Submission Under 37 CFR 1.99 filed Jun. 2, 2011, directed towards U.S. Appl. No. 12/203,698; 3 pages. |
Atkinson et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/895,691; 10 pages. |
Hodgson et al., U.S. Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2014, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 13/207,212; 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130302156 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |