1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a fan incorporating features to stiffen the blades of the fan.
2. Description of Related Prior Art
U.S. Pat. No. 5,501,575 discloses a fan blade attachment for gas turbine engines. A sloped deep slot is formed in the rim of a disk for accepting the dovetail of a root of the fan or compressor blade allowing the removal of a single blade from the disk. A segmented retainer plate is disposed at the aft end of the blade root and bears against the blade root to react out the slope induced axial blade loads, providing a low hub-tip ratio configuration. An annular shaped seal plate is adjacent to a platform of the blade and is utilized so as to prevent recirculation of the air in the attachment at the rim of the rotor disk.
In summary, the invention is a fan. The fan includes a hub portion operable to rotate about an axis. The hub portion extends along the axis between forward and aft ends. The fan also includes at least one platform operably fixed with the hub portion. The at least one platform at least partially encircles the axis. The fan also includes at least one airfoil extending from the at least one platform radially outward relative to the axis between a base and a tip. The at least one platform terminates at forward and aft circumferential edges spaced from one another along the axis. At least one of the forward and aft circumferential edges extends about the axis and along the axis.
Advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
A plurality of different embodiments of the invention is shown in the Figures of the application. Similar features are shown in the various embodiments of the invention. Similar features have been numbered with a common reference numeral and have been differentiated by an alphabetic suffix. Also, to enhance consistency, the structures in any particular drawing share the same alphabetic suffix even if a particular feature is shown in less than all embodiments. Similar features are structured similarly, operate similarly, and/or have the same function unless otherwise indicated by the drawings or this specification. Furthermore, particular features of one embodiment can replace corresponding features in another embodiment or can supplement other embodiments unless otherwise indicated by the drawings or this specification.
The invention, as exemplified in the embodiments described below, can be applied to stiffen fan blades, raising the natural frequency of the stiffened blades. Forces can be transmitted from the blades to other rotating structures along the centerline axis of the fan. These forces can be transmitted along the inner boundary of the flow path. The stiffened fan blades can yield a relatively large flutter benefit. Generally, every 5% increase in the natural frequency of the blade is estimated to be worth 1% in flutter margin. It is further estimated that the first bend frequency of the blade, which is usually the fluttering mode, could be stiffened by 20% or more giving 4% or more flutter margin to a fan design. If not needed for fan stability, this margin benefit could be traded for a lighter fan blade giving significant weight savings to a turbofan engine. The exemplary embodiment of the invention also produces a secondary benefit to blade impact by giving multiple paths for force transfer to the other structures. Typically impact forces are transferred primarily through the airfoil to the hub with secondary load paths through adjacent platforms. In the exemplary embodiments described below, the interlocking or meshing of the fan and the spinner and/or the aft fan seal plate could reduce the plastic strain in the airfoil under large bird, medium bird, hail, and ice slab ingestion. This would allow less material to be used in the airfoil and blade stalk. Additionally, since material of the spinner and/or aft fan seal plate would replace material that is typically used to define the flow path on the fan, the fan blade off loads and resulting imbalance would also be reduced allowing a lighter containment system and lighter engine frame to be designed.
While the exemplary embodiments of the invention can provide the benefits identified above, alternative embodiments of the invention can be practiced to yield similar benefits in different operating environments. However, it is noted that any benefits set forth herein may not be realized in all operating environments for all embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, it is noted that the benefits articulated herein are not exhaustive, other benefits may be perceived in the practice of one or more of the exemplary embodiments or in the practice of alternative embodiments of the invention. The benefits associated with the exemplary embodiments and described herein are not limitations of the broader invention, but rather demonstrate industrial applicability of the invention through the exemplary embodiments.
Referring to
A nose cone assembly 28 can be attached to the fan 14. As set forth above and shown in
The hub portion 30 extends along the axis 24 (shown in
The airfoil 36 extends from the platform 38 radially outward relative to the axis 24 between a base 50 and a tip (not visible in
As shown in
Referring again to
The grooves/projections defined by the edge 52 and/or the edge 54 can be circumferentially spaced from one another about the axis 24. The grooves/projections defined by edge 52 and/or edge 54 can be evenly spaced or grouped in clusters. The grooves/projections defined by edge 52 and/or edge 54 can be circumferentially spaced from the airfoils 36 about the axis 24 (as in the exemplary embodiment) or can be circumferentially aligned with the airfoils 36.
Similarly, at the aft edge 54, the fan 14 can be interlocked with the seal plate 44. The seal plate 44 can define a circumferential edge 74 that extends about the axis 24 and along the axis 24 and meshes with the aft circumferential edge 54. The edges 54 and 74 can be engaged such as the teeth of one gear mesh with those of another. The edge 74 can define a plurality of grooves/projections shaped to correspond to the shape of grooves/projections defined by the edge 54.
The shapes of the mating edges can be selected in view of the conditions of the operating environment. For example, if it is desired to transfer tangential/circumferential loads or axial loads, patterns of square shaped grooves and projections can be desirable. Alternatively, if it is desired to control the ratio between tangential/circumferential loads and axial loads, patterns of triangular or sinusoidal shaped grooves and projections can be desirable.
As shown in
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. The right to claim elements and/or sub-combinations of the combinations disclosed herein is hereby reserved.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1639247 | Zoelly et al. | Aug 1927 | A |
| 1970435 | Sharp | Aug 1934 | A |
| 2292072 | Hanna et al. | Aug 1942 | A |
| 2614638 | Beaupre | Oct 1952 | A |
| 2823895 | Floroff | Feb 1958 | A |
| 2916258 | Klint | Dec 1959 | A |
| 2934259 | Hausmann | Apr 1960 | A |
| 2948506 | Glasser et al. | Aug 1960 | A |
| 3347520 | Owczarek | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3644058 | Barnabei et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3709631 | Karstensen et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3751183 | Nichols et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
| 4019833 | Gale | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4097192 | Kulina | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4177011 | Eskesen et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4182598 | Nelson | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4279572 | Auriemma | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4349318 | Libertini et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4405285 | Surdi | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4470756 | Rigo et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4494909 | Forestier | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4576551 | Olivier et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4872812 | Hendley et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4936749 | Arrao et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4967550 | Acton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5005353 | Acton et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5230603 | Day | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5281096 | Harris et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286168 | Smith | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5302085 | Dietz et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5313786 | Chlus et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5350279 | Prentice et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5478207 | Stec | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5501575 | Eldredge et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5540551 | Heinig | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5567114 | Wallace | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5573375 | Barcza | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5580217 | Richards et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5620303 | Moffitt et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5667361 | Yaeger et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5913660 | Knott | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5988980 | Busbey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5988982 | Clauer | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993161 | Shapiro | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6042338 | Brafford et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6195982 | Gysling et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6379112 | Montgomery | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6428278 | Montgomery et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6457942 | Forrester | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471482 | Montgomery et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6524070 | Carter | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524074 | Farrar et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6582183 | Eveker et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6659725 | Yeo et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6814543 | Barb et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 7082371 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7147437 | Burdgick et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| RE39630 | Stangeland et al. | May 2007 | E |
| 7244104 | Girgis et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252481 | Stone | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7258529 | Wagner | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7264447 | Ono et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7500299 | Dupeux et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7500832 | Zagar et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7520718 | Engle | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7530791 | Douville et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7721526 | Fujimura et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 20070217915 | Fujimura et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243067 | Bil et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20100329873 | Ruba et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110076148 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |