The invention pertains generally to firearms, and more specifically to battery powered fast-action actuators for use in critical high shock and acceleration exposure environments such as in firearms.
Electromagnetic actuators are typically not used in small portable applications where a reliable fast action, high force, and large displacement is needed, but instead small size, low battery power consumption, and shock invariance is required for mission critical safety and performance such as in a firearm. Typically, electromagnetic actuators require high power energy sources and large electromagnet coils to achieve either fast action or high force and displacement, thereby making them generally unsuitable for use in firearms with spatial and other operational constraints. It is difficult to achieve both small size and fast action while maintaining a useful amount of force and displacement in a small battery powered device.
In addition, traditional approaches for actuators used in firing mechanisms of firearms are very susceptible to unintentional actuation induced by accidental or intentional dropping, jarring, mishandling, and harsh environments of use. Typical actuators in these applications are mechanical devices that use strong springs, levers, sears, and safety linkages to provide fast action and provide safety from accidental actuation. Such conventional mechanical firing systems however are complex and hence prone to operating problems and wear.
An improved actuator suitable for a firearm is desired.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, an electromagnetic actuator suitable for a firearm is disclosed that provides the novel combination of very fast actuation, shock invariant design, small size, and which can be controlled using a small low voltage battery power source and simple switching logic. In one embodiment, very fast snap-like action is attained by balancing the forces of two opposing permanent magnets around a central yoke and rotating member to create three circulating magnetic flux circuits. A central electromagnet coil in the center of the yoke amplifies the magnetic flux of one side of the rotating member or the other depending on the actuation polarity. As the rotating member begins to change state or position, an air gap opens on the opposing side (previously closed) of the rotating member and the combined change in reluctance in the three circulating magnetic flux circuits causes a rapid increase in the flux density on the closing side (previously open) of the rotating member and a rapidly decreasing force on the opening side resulting in a very fast snap action closure of the rotating member. This creates two possible actuation positions of the rotating member which can interact and be interfaced with the firing mechanism of a firearm in either a firing mechanism component release application to discharge the firearm, or alternatively a firing mechanism blocking/enablement application each of which is further describe herein.
The disclosed actuator design may have a center of rotation of the rotating member sufficiently close to the center of mass of the rotating member such that random linear acceleration forces from any direction will not generate sufficient force to overcome the static holding force of the permanent magnets on the rotating member. The use of closed feedback sensing of actuation allows very fast reset of the actuator and optimal power conservation. Closed feedback sensing is well known in the art and basically comprises a control loop including an instrumentation sensor that measures the process, a transmitter which converts the measurements into an electrical signal that is relayed to the controller, and the actuator which performs a function measured by the sensor. The controller decides what action to execute based on real-time feedback from the sensor.
In one embodiment of the present invention, strong permanent magnets may be used in combination with a electromagnetic coil optimally designed to substantially improve the speed of actuation under minimal size and power requirements and combined with a center of rotation of the rotating member sufficiently close to the center of mass of the rotating member that random linear acceleration forces from any direction will not generate sufficient force to overcome the static holding force of the rotating member. The use of closed feedback sensing of actuation allows very fast reset of the actuator and optimal power conservation. The foregoing characteristics are ideally suited for incorporation of the electromagnetic actuator into the firing mechanism of a firearm which requires rapid actuation and ability to withstand standard drop tests to verify that the firearm will not discharge in the absence of trigger pull.
The electromagnetic actuators of the present invention may be integrated with an onboard microprocessor-based control system disposed in the firearm which comprises a programmable controller such as a microcontroller. The microcontroller may be configured with program instructions/control logic (e.g. software) which controls operation of the actuator and various functions of the firearm, as further described herein.
Embodiments of the present invention provide an actuator that is able to withstand high shock and acceleration forces without changing state, thereby making them suitable for use in a firearm or other applications benefiting from such capabilities.
The foregoing or other embodiments of the present invention control the change in state at a fast speed of actuation; for example less than 10 milliseconds and a displacement of at least 0.5 millimeters in one non-limiting configuration.
The foregoing or other embodiments of the present invention comprise an actuator that is small in size; for example less than 20 cubic centimeters in one non-limiting configuration.
The foregoing or other embodiments of the present invention provide that the actuator can be controlled using a small low voltage battery source and simple switching logic.
The foregoing or other embodiments of the present invention include the actuator use of a closed feedback sensing of the actuation to allow very fast reset and optimal power conservation.
According to one aspect, a firearm with firing mechanism comprises: a frame; a barrel supported by the frame and including a chamber configured for holding an ammunition cartridge; a movable firing mechanism supported by the frame and comprising a forwardly movable spring-biased striking member and a movable trigger mechanism operably coupled to the striking member, the firing mechanism configured and operable for discharging the firearm; and an electromagnetic actuator operably interfaced with the firing mechanism. The actuator comprises: an annular body defining a central space and central axis; a stationary magnetic yoke having an outer portion forming at least part of the annular body; a rotating member pivotally mounted about a center of rotation in the central space, the rotating member pivotably movable relative to the yoke between first and second actuation positions; an electromagnet coil disposed in the central space; and a pair of first and second permanent magnets affixed to the yoke or rotating member, the magnets positioned to generate opposing magnetic fields within the rotating member and creating a static holding torque on the rotating member for maintaining the first or second actuation positions. The firearm further comprises an electric power source operably coupled to the electromagnet coil, wherein the rotating member is rotatable between the first and second actuation positions by applying an electrical current pulse of alternating polarity to the electromagnet coil.
According to another aspect, a firearm with firing mechanism comprises: a frame; a barrel supported by the frame and including a chamber configured for holding an ammunition cartridge; a trigger-operated firing mechanism comprising a trigger and a spring-biased striking member operably coupled thereto, the striking member movable between a rearward cocked position and a forward firing position for discharging the firearm; and an electromagnetic actuator operably interfaced with the firing mechanism. The actuator comprises: an annular body defining a central space and central axis; a stationary magnetic yoke having an outer portion forming at least part of the annular body and an inner portion extending into the central space; a rotating member pivotally mounted in the central space to the inner portion of the yoke about an axis of rotation, the rotating member pivotably movable relative to the yoke between first and second actuation positions; an electromagnet coil disposed in the central space around the inner the inner portion of the yoke; and a pair of first and second permanent magnets affixed to the yoke or rotating member, the magnets positioned to generate opposing magnetic fields within the rotating member and creating a static holding torque on the rotating member for maintaining the first or second actuation positions. The firearm further comprises an electric power source operably coupled to the electromagnet coil, wherein the rotating member is rotatable between the first and second actuation positions by applying an electrical current pulse of alternating polarity to the electromagnet coil.
According to another aspect, an electromagnetic-actuated firing system for a firearm comprises: a trigger-operated firing mechanism configured for mounting to a firearm, the firing mechanism comprising a spring-biased striking member movable between a rearward cocked position and a forward firing position; an actuator control circuit; an electric power source operably coupled to the control circuit; and an electromagnetic actuator operably coupled to the control circuit. The actuator is configured for mounting to a firearm and comprises: a central axis; a stationary yoke assembly comprising an outer yoke configured for mounting in a firearm, and an axially elongated inner yoke disposed in a central space defined by the outer yoke; an electromagnet coil disposed around the inner yoke; a rotating member pivotally coupled to the inner yoke in the central space about a pivot axis defining a center of rotation, the rotating member pivotably movable relative to the yoke assembly between first and second actuation positions; an engagement feature formed on the rotating member and operably coupled directly or indirectly to the striking member; a pair of openable and closeable first and second air gaps formed between the yoke assembly and rotating member; and a pair of first and second permanent magnets attached to the outer yoke or rotating member and creating a static holding torque on the rotating member to maintain the first or second actuation positions; the yoke assembly, permanent magnets, and rotating member collectively forming a first magnetic flux circuit and a second magnetic flux circuit, wherein opposing lines of magnetic flux are created in the inner yoke and rotating member. The rotating member is rotatable between the first and second actuation positions by applying an electrical current pulse of alternating polarity to the electromagnet coil by the control circuit.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in the light of the following detailed description and as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The features of the exemplary embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawings where like elements are labeled similarly, and in which:
All drawings are schematic and not necessarily to scale. Any reference herein to a whole figure number (e.g.
The features and benefits of the invention are illustrated and described herein by reference to example (“exemplary”) embodiments. This description of exemplary embodiments is intended to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entire written description. In the description of embodiments disclosed herein, any reference to direction or orientation is merely intended for convenience of description and is not intended in any way to limit the scope of the present invention. Relative terms such as “lower,” “upper,” “horizontal,” “vertical,”, “above,” “below,” “up,” “down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivative thereof (e.g., “horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed to refer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawing under discussion. These relative terms are for convenience of description only and do not require that the apparatus be constructed or operated in a particular orientation. Terms such as “attached,” “affixed,” “connected,” and “interconnected,” refer to a relationship wherein structures are secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectly through intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigid attachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise. Accordingly, the disclosure expressly should not be limited to such exemplary embodiments illustrating some possible non-limiting combination of features that may exist alone or in other combinations of features.
As used throughout, any ranges disclosed herein are used as shorthand for describing each and every value that is within the range. Any value within the range can be selected as the terminus of the range.
While the embodiments discussed here all relate to the application in firearms, it is apparent to those skilled in the art that the fast action shock invariant magnetic actuator disclosed is directly applicable to other applications that need a small, battery powered fast acting actuation means that can survive in a high shock environment such as less-lethal weapons (stun guns, pellet guns, tear gas launchers, paintball guns), power tools (drills staple guns, nail guns, pneumatic tools), military applications (small arms, crew served weapons, machine guns), as well as an actuator for access control such as gun holsters, door locks, storage boxes and containers, and any number of replacement applications where other mechanical or electromechanical actuators are used. Accordingly, the applicability of the magnetic actuator mechanisms disclosed herein is not limited to firearms alone and has broad uses in devices and systems that may benefit from the attributes of the actuator.
A permanent magnet 105, 107 may be affixed to each upright end portion 102C, 102D to generate a static bias, as further described herein. In one embodiment, magnets 105, 107 may be disposed at the interface between the base portion 102A and upright end portions 102C, 102D of the yoke 102. The magnets may be made of any suitable type of magnetic material, such as without limitation rare earth magnets like neodymium or others.
In one configuration, rotating member 104 comprises an elongated top portion 104A shown in a substantially horizontal orientation (for convenience of reference only), a downwardly depending central portion 104D extending downwards from the top portion, and downwardly depending opposing end portions 104B, 104C extending downwards from the top portion ends 113, 114. Rotating member 104 may have a generally T-shape configuration in one embodiment, which may have a somewhat complementary-configuration to yoke 102. Similarly to yoke 102, central portion 104D may be located intermediate and equidistant between opposing ends 113, 114 of the top portion 104A.
Rotating member 104 may be pivotably connected to stationary yoke 102 via pivot 101 defining a pivot axis (perpendicular to the plane of the
The end surfaces 111, 112, 115, 116 of the terminal free ends of the mating rotating member end portions 104B, 104C and of yoke end portions 102C, 102D are movable together and apart via the pivoting action of the rotating member 104 relative to the stationary yoke 102. Accordingly, an openable and closeable air space or gap A, B is formed each mating pair of end portions 102C/104B and 102D/014C. In one embodiment, the interface between each mating pair of end surfaces may obliquely angled at an angle A1 in relation to a horizontal reference plane Hp passing through gaps A, B. The obliquely angle end surfaces ensures that abutting contact between each pair of mating end surfaces is one of flat-to-flat when the rotating member 104 tilts from one side to the other when the actuator 100 is actuated.
In one embodiment, an arcuately curved interface may be provided between the central portions 102B, 104D of the yoke 102 and rotating member 104 respectively to facilitate pivotable motion of the rotating member. Accordingly, central portion 102B may have a concavely curved terminal free end 106 and central portion 104D may have a convexly curved terminal free end 108 as shown, or vice-versa. The mating end surfaces of the free ends are in sliding mutual engagement allowing the rotating member 104 to rotate or rock back and forth when operating, as further described herein. Other interface configurations may be used that provide rocker-type action.
Rotating member 104 is pivotably movable between a first position and a second position. Each position alternatingly forms a closed air gap A or B on one side of the actuator 100 and an open air gap A or B on the other side during tilting action of rotating member depending on the direction of tilt. This motion is useful for forming a component part of the firing mechanism of a firearm in either a release mode of operation or a blocking/unblocking mode of operation, as further described herein.
With continuing reference to
The stationary yoke 102 and rotating member 104 may be formed of any suitable soft ferromagnetic metal capable of being magnetized, such as without limitation iron, steel, nickel, etc.
A key feature of the present electromagnetic actuator 100 is the interaction of the three magnetic flux fields generated in the actuator when energized by a suitable compact power source 122, as shown in
Actuator 100 may further include an engagement feature strategically located on the rotating member 104 and configured to interface with a component of the firearm's firing mechanism in either a blocking or release operational role. In various embodiments, the engagement feature may be an operating extension or protrusion 172 of the rotating member 104 as illustrated herein, a socket or recess formed in the rotating member (not shown), or other element of other type and/or configuration (not shown) capable of mechanically interfacing with the firing mechanism. Although the engagement feature may be described herein for convenience of description and not limitation as an operating protrusion, any other form of engagement feature may be provided so long as the feature is capable of mechanically interfacing with a portion of the firing mechanism. The engagement feature when configured as a protrusion 172 extends outwardly from the rotating member and may have any suitable configuration and size. The engagement feature 172 is further described herein with respect to
It bears noting that the shape of the various actuators shown in the accompanying figures is intended to be schematically descriptive; thus, geometries are rectangular. In actual use, the actuators may be a variety of shapes and contours, provided the center of rotation is sufficiently close to the center of mass of the rotating member for reasons described herein.
The rotating member 104 is shown having an engagement feature 172 in the form of an outwardly projecting operating protrusion configured for engaging a firing mechanism component of the firearm in either a blocking or release type mode of operation; examples of each being described herein. Although engagement feature 172 is illustrated as having a rectilinear shape (e.g. rectangular or square), other polygonal and non-polygonal shapes may be used depending on the application and corresponding configuration of the firing mechanism component engaged. Protrusion 172 may be centrally located on the top portion 104A of rotating member 104 and moves laterally back and forth to two different positions as the actuator 180 is activated. Other locations for protrusion 172 on the rotating member 104 may be used, such as for example (1) different lateral positions on vertical side sections the end portions 104B, 104C for upward/downward motion (see, e.g. 172′), (2) underside positions on the in-turned horizontal bottom sections of the end portions (see, e.g. 172″), or other top-side positions on the top portion 104A (see, e.g. 172′″). Any of these positions or others may be used which may be beneficial in certain firearm installations depending on the layout of the firing mechanism components. Various embodiments contemplated may include more than one operating protrusion 172 comprising any combination of the foregoing possible locations. This would allow the actuator 180 to block and/or release more than one firing component
Design Considerations
Design criteria for implementation of a fast action shock invariant magnetic actuator in a firearm creates numerous challenges. The actuator preferably should be capable of mechanical displacements suitable for either blocking or releasing mechanical devices such as on a firearm. For example, the actuator may be configured for releasing functionality to directly release an energy storage device in the form of a striking member such as a rotatable spring-biased hammer as shown in
It bears noting that the actuator may be oriented within or on the firearm frame to produce motion of the rotating member in any number of possible directions and orientations, including for example without limitation forward/rearward, up/down, laterally side to side, or any direction and orientation therebetween. Motion may be parallel to, transversely to, or obliquely to the longitudinal axis of the firearm defined by the bore of the elongated barrel which chambers an ammunition cartridge. The direction and orientation of motion will be dictated at least in part by the arrangement and location of the firing mechanism components in the firearm with which the actuator interacts, and the overall physical design of the firearm package.
In different embodiments, the actuator preferably should be physically small enough to fit within the handgun (e.g. pistol or revolver) or long gun (e.g. shotgun, carbine, or rifle), or be appended thereto preferably without adding undue bulk to the firearm. The volume to force ratio of the actuator is desired to be as low as possible. The optimal actuator will be strong enough to operate directly on the energy storage device (i.e. spring-biased hammer or striker) as seen in
In certain non-limiting embodiments, the actuator preferably should also be capable operating from a portable electric power source such as battery power, with batteries suitable for packaging within the firearm. This imposes certain power restrictions. This also suggests that actuation must either be bistable and fast-acting or be timed to a transient timed event. Practically, because of power consumption considerations, it is preferable the actuator not be held under active electrical power for indeterminate durations to conserve battery life.
Firearms must be capable of withstanding very large randomly unidirectional shocks, such as those encountered in a drop test. Some state regulations such as Massachusetts, New York, and California mandate drop tests. Drop testing is a means to determine whether a handgun will fire after being dropped onto a hard surface from a specified distance. An actuator for use in the firing mechanism of a firearm must therefore be immune to changing states or positions from such a shock. This practically eliminates most linear actuator designs from consideration.
Actuation speed must be consistent with normal rapid firearm cycle times. For example, if an actuator releases a hammer or striker, then the state change must be capable of being reset at speeds that are faster than those demanded by the natural cycle time of the reciprocating slide or bolt such as used in the actions of semi-automatic firearm to discharge a round and unload/load cartridges from the barrel chamber. In general, the actuator must generally be very rapid acting, on the order of milliseconds, not hundreds of milliseconds.
In certain non-limiting embodiments, the actuator preferably should be capable of being controlled by low-level logic signals with minimal intermediate circuits. The best design will use simple switching circuits such as transistors, FETs or other solid-state switches. Minimal voltage scaling from raw battery voltage is optimum as shown in
In certain non-limiting embodiments, the actuator preferably should have a usable cycle lifetime equal to or better than the cycle lifetime of the firearm. Firearms experience very harsh operational conditions including chemical contamination from ammunition powders and cleaning solutions, dust and grime from outdoor use, thermal extremes, and shock and vibration from firing. The actuator must be capable of operating successfully in these conditions. This suggests a minimum force which can be practically tolerated is related to the frictional forces required to clear the actuation path from oil and dirt. The imposition of a minimum force, in practice, suggests the actuator is limited in how small it can be made.
Technology Considerations
Several core technologies may be considered for use of a non-conventional actuator in the firing mechanism of a firearm, including for example: piezo actuators, linear solenoids, gear motors, brushless electric DC (BLDC) motors, and custom magnetics. However, these technologies are not ideally suited for use in a firearm and fail to meet the foregoing design criteria described for the following reasons.
For example, piezo stack actuators coupled with mechanical displacement multipliers were considered and tested. Advantages include high-speed and low-power. Disadvantages include high-cost, piezo stack failure due to mechanical or electrical shock, and very high drive voltages, requiring complex power supplies.
Commercially-off-the-shelf (COTS) linear solenoids are readily available. Advantages are cost and availability. Disadvantages include susceptibility to drop test failure, contamination failure and low nonlinear force profiles.
DC gear motors are used in many consumer products and in the hobby toy industry. Advantages are high linear force and relatively low power. Disadvantages include very slow actuation speed, susceptibility to jamming and damage in the drive system due to inherent complexity and fragility, and relatively short unpredictable lifecycles.
Brushless Electric DC (BLDC) Motors are gaining widespread use in many industries. BLDC motors offer the highest shaft power to weight ratios in industry. When used as a short-stroke actuator; however, the magnetic configuration yields low force to physical volume ratios. The absence of a suitable COTS solution motivated an investigation into a custom magnetic actuator specifically designed for gun applications.
Functional Use Categories
As noted above, the application of the present electromagnetic actuator 100 according to the present disclosure to the firing mechanism of a firearm for discharging the firearm can generally be described in two ways: (1) a release actuator; or (2) an enabling/disabling actuator. Examples of each application is now described in further detail below.
Release Actuator
A release actuator 100 is intended to directly or indirectly release the energy in the energy storage device (e.g. spring-biased hammer or striker) which is movable to strike a chambered cartridge positioned in the barrel of the firearm. If the sear is built into the actuator, then the actuator is directly releasing the hammer or striker as shown in
A release actuator 100 always receives an electrical actuation signal synchronous with the firing of the gun. That is, the state of the gun is known at the time of the actuation, and the duration of the actuation can be a fixed timed event as shown in
In
In
Enabling/Disabling Actuator
An enabling/disabling actuator 100 acts on some component in the mechanical fire control mechanism of the firearm.
Whereas a release actuator is always synchronous with the firing of the firearm, an enabling/disabling actuator may be synchronous, but may also be configured to be asynchronous with the firing of the firearm. In the case of asynchronous actuation, the state of the firearm may not be fully known at the time of actuation. It is possible that the firearm could be in a state that mechanically blocks the actuator from completing its action. In this case, control logic must be incorporated within the activating circuit to complete the action when the firearm is in a proper state. A non-limiting example of an enabling/disabling actuator control logic flowchart is shown in
As a clarifying example, consider a disabling actuator that interferes with the trigger bar by engaging a slot in the trigger bar as shown in
Referring now to
In Step 308, the state or position of the trigger 132 is sensed by the microcontroller (i.e. trigger pulled or not pulled). The trigger sensors 159A and/or 159B sense and provide the trigger positional status to the microcontroller. If the microcontroller senses that the trigger has already been pulled at the time the actuator actuation signal is initiated (“yes”), a preprogrammed delay timer is activated (Step 309). The system will continue to check the status of the trigger for the duration of the delay time to determine if the trigger has been reset (i.e. no longer in a pulled position and in a forward ready-to-fire state). If the timer times out and exceeds the preprogrammed delay time as determined in Step 310, this condition is indicative of a trigger malfunction. The microcontroller reports the trigger rest failure to the user in Step 311 and the user is notified of the failure to activate the actuator (Step 320). However, if conversely the trigger 132 resets before the delay time is exceeded (“no” response returned in Step 308 indicating trigger is not in a rearward pulled position), the actuation signal is passed to the actuator 100 in Step 312 and the actuator is energized (see also block 220,
In Step 314, the microcontroller performs a test and checks to confirm that the actuator 100 has physically changed position. If a “no” response is received by the microcontroller 200, control passes to the test of Step 315. The microcontroller is preprogrammed with “X” number of attempts that will be attempted by the system to activate the actuator before the process is discontinued. In one non-limiting example, X may equal 3 attempts; however, more or less attempts may be used. If the actuator 100 is still not activated after X attempts, the actuator failure is reported to the user in Step 316 and the user is notified of the failure to activate the actuator (Step 320). If the actuator is activated before X attempts (“yes” response in test Step 314) or the first time (“yes” response immediately in Step 314), the user is notified of the same in Step 318. It will be appreciated that numerous variations of the process may be used in other implementations.
It bears noting that if the system is configured for “enabling/disabling” operation, the actuator operating protrusion 172 is automatically engaged with blocking slot 183 in the trigger bar 167 as the default position when the system is energized. Position of the actuator may change to actuate the actuator and disengaged the operating protrusion from the slot when activated by the occurrence of one or more events which are monitored by the microcontroller 200. The events may include without limitation proper authentication confirmation (further described herein), a trigger pull, grip force sensor indication, motion sensor (e.g. accelerometer), battery status, etc. This forms a multi-layered safety system intended to avoid unintentional and/or unauthorized firing of the firearm.
Actuator Action Categories
The actuators described herein may be configured to operate in a variety of ways that have applicability to firearms or other devices. In a first mode of operation, an actuator can be configured to be either momentary acting or bistable. In the case of a momentary actuator, electrical energy will move the actuator from a rest position to an active position. When the electrical signal is removed, an external force (usually imparted by a spring, slide, bolt, or other component of a firearm) is required to move and reset the actuator back into the rest position (see, e.g.
Bistable actuators move between two magnetically stable positions A and B. Electrical energy is always supplied to move from position A to B. Either electrical energy or optionally an external force can be used to move from position B back to A. Bistable actuators can be either synchronous or asynchronous. Energy is only supplied to the actuator from the power source during the transitions, thereby conserving battery life.
In a second mode of operation, an actuator can be configured to be either single or dual acting. A single acting actuator moves under electrical power to a single position. A dual acting actuator can be driven under electrical power to one of two positions. A momentary actuator is usually but not necessarily single acting. Bistable actuators may be either single acting or dual acting.
Drop Test Compliance
To achieve drop test compliance, an actuator for a firearm optimally should have at least three properties: (1) they must have a principle rotating member; (2) the center of rotation must be mathematically sufficiently close to the center of mass of the rotating member; and (3) interacting surfaces between the actuator rotating member and accompanying external mechanical parts must be designed such that force from the external part cannot apply a net torque on the rotating member to force a position or state change. The first two properties ensure that the actuator as a stand-alone component is insensitive to a random direction, high-force, linear shock such as those experienced in a drop test. The last property ensures that an external component, under shock forces, cannot force a state change on the actuator. If these properties cannot be satisfied, then external safeties must be designed to ensure drop test compliance. In the case of a momentary actuator, the necessity of an external spring makes satisfying these conditions increasingly complex or impossible. For this reason, one preferred but non-limiting embodiment of this invention is focused on bistable, intrinsically drop test compliant designs.
Target Design Categories
The present invention relates to both release and enable/disable, drop test compliant bistable actuators, either single or dual acting. The core design principles are similar in all cases. The design distinctions are principally defined by the use case.
Core Design Principles
Basic magnetic actuator design uses “soft” magnetic materials to focus magnetic flux into a geometrically designed air gap such that the magnetic flux within the air gap produces a mechanical force across air gap. Soft magnetic materials have large magnetic permeability, where the permeability is defined as the ratio of the produced magnetic flux density to the magnetizing field. Refer to Equation 1.
{right arrow over (B)}μ{right arrow over (H)} Equation 1.
Where
B≡E magnetic fluxdensity
H≡magnetizing field
μ≡permeability Equation 2.
This can be restated in terms of the permeability of free space.
μ=μ0μr Equation 3.
Where
Various magnetic materials may be suitably used; however, since magnetic actuators are relatively low-frequency devices, magnetic hysteresis is relatively unimportant. Low carbon steels can be suitably used for magnetic flux densities up to 1.5 to 2.0 tesla (T). Many more exotic materials are available at increased cost and increased manufacturing complexity.
The use of soft magnetic materials and well-defined air gaps allow the designer to approach the design of magnetic circuits similarly to the design of DC electrical circuits, with relationships that parallel Ohm's Law.
In electrical circuits we have the relationship for Ohm's Law.
V=I×R Equation 5.
In magnetic circuits a similar relationship can be used.
Reluctance for a uniform rectangular air gap is given by the following.
In terms of an air gap, the flux in Equation 6 can be approximated as follows.
ϕ=B×a9 Equation 8.
For a first order approximation, the above equations may be used to predict the magnetic flux density in an air gap produced by applying current through an external conductive coil wrapped around the magnetic material as shown in the theoretical model of
This principle can be exploited to produce static biases within the magnetic circuit which, when coupled with the variable reluctance of a changing air gap, forms the basis for a bistable magnetic actuator. The forces achieved by such actuators are driven by the magnetic flux density within the air gap and are expressed below.
Thus, it can be shown that the force within the air gap increases with increasing air gap cross-sectional area and decreases with the square of the length of the air gap. Consider
It is not necessary for the force to be a physical external force. Consider
Drop Test Compliant Actuator Design
Firearms are subjected to drop tests to quantify that the firing mechanisms do not actuate in the absence of a trigger pull within certain parameters. One design goal of the present invention is that the actuator should be sufficiently resistant to changing states when exposed to large external linear shock forces such as those experienced by dropping the device onto a hard surface or an applied impact with a hard surface. Such linear shocks can be quantified by expressing the acceleration experienced by the actuator as some multiple, k, of the standard gravitational acceleration constant, g (9.8 m/s/s).
If the center of rotation of the actuator rotating member is located at the precise center of mass of the rotating member, then any external forces on the rotating member due to linear shock will be completely balanced about the center of rotation and the resulting moment of force (torque) on the rotating member will be zero. Hence, in the ideal design, with the center of rotation and the center of mass perfectly aligned and coaxial, the actuator will be completely immune to changing states under the influence of all external shocks and forces.
In practical terms, however, the distance between the center of mass and the center of rotation of the rotating member cannot be exactly zero or coaxial due to practical limits on manufacturing tolerances. The distance, r, between the actual center of mass and the actual center of rotation can be thought of as the length of a lever arm that transfers the external shock force as a torque acting against the holding force of the actuator. As long as the shock force transferred to the actuator as torque is below the holding torque of the actuator, the actuator will not change states. By controlling the design and manufacturing tolerances of r, the actuator can be made immune to shock forces below some specified value. The term “substantially” coaxial as may be used herein reflects consideration of the manufacturing process.
In simple terms, if the actuator is subjected to a linear shock, then the acceleration due to that shock can be expressed as some multiple, k, of the gravitational acceleration constant, g. And the resulting applied force is given by the product of mass and acceleration.
F=mkg,
The maximum possible applied torque occurs when the force is perpendicular to the lever arm and is given by the product of the force and the length, r, of the lever arm.
T(max)=Fr,
For a given linear shock, T(max) can be reduced by minimizing and controlling r.
Taking into consideration many factors such as manufacturing tolerances, the operating environment, and the forces that might be encountered in our preferred firearm applications, plus a margin of safety, it is desired that the actuator should be capable of withstanding a shock force of at least 100 g. Higher shocks are preferable though.
For a given actuator of known mass and holding torque, we can then define a maximum permissible value for r.
r<T(hold)/(m*g*100)
Values for r which exceed the above relationship would not be suitable for firearm applications without secondary safety measures.
Resistance to External Magnetic Fields
Since magnetic force within the air gap increases with magnetic cross-sectional area and decreases with the square of the air gap length, practical designs which are optimized for force and speed tend to minimize the length relative to the cross-sectional area. A consequence of this is that actuator designs based on these design principles are inherently immune to external magnetic field interference. In practice, it is impossible to change the state of the actuator using an external magnet (and optional iron yoke) provided the rotating member is physically isolated from the external magnet by at least one air gap distance. This will always be the case in practical firearm embodiments.
The embodiment of
By contrast, a single acting actuator 170 may benefit from an asymmetric design. An example is shown in the embodiment of
Referring to
To provide the actuation force needed to reset the present asymmetric actuator 170, the present embodiment advantageously uses the recoil force generated from cycling a firearm as shown in
Firearm 50 may be a rifle; however, the direct release actuator 170 with integrated sear 124 may be embodied in other types of firearms including shotguns or handguns such as semi-automatic pistols or revolvers. Firearm 50 may include a frame 126 directly or indirectly supporting the single acting asymmetric electromagnetic actuator 170, a receiver 140 for loading/unloading ammunition cartridges into the action, a barrel 142 coupled to the receiver, a trigger assembly comprising a movable trigger 132, and a pivotable hammer 130. In other possible firearm embodiments such as a semi-automatic pistol shown in
Barrel is axially elongated and includes a rear breech end 148 defining a chamber 150 configured for holding a cartridge and an opposite front muzzle end (not shown) through which a projectile exits the barrel. An axially extending bore 151 is formed between the muzzle and breech ends, and defines a projectile pathway in a well-known manner. The barrel bore 151 defines a longitudinal axis LA of the firearm and associated axial direction; a transverse direction being defined laterally with respect to the longitudinal axis.
The receiver 140 in
The trigger assembly includes a trigger spring 133 which biases the trigger towards a forward substantially vertical rest position as shown. Any suitable type spring may be used, such as a torsion spring as shown for one non-limiting example. Trigger 132 may be pivotably mounted to frame 126 or receiver 140 in one embodiment via a transverse pivot pin 134. Linearly movable triggers however may also be used.
Hammer 130 may be pivotably mounted to the frame or receiver via another transverse pivot pin 135 and is movable between a rearward cocked position (see, e.g.
Sear 124 of the present direct acting actuator embodiment being described is pivotably mounted to the central portion 102B of the stationary via a pivot connection, thereby providing a hinged actuator-sear assembly. This allows the sear 124 to rotate or rock with respect to the yoke for alternatingly engaging or disengaging the hammer 130. In one possible embodiment, a pin-less pivot connection may be provided as shown in
The foregoing combination of mating pivot connection elements provides pin-less guided rock-type action for the sear to engage, hold, and release the hammer. In other possible embodiments, it will be appreciated that a pinned connection similar to or different than that shown in
Operation of the single acting asymmetric electromagnetic actuator 170 in the direct release application described above will now be briefly explained. Starting with
Referring back to
Recoil forces produced by detonating the cartridge drives the bolt 136 axially rearwards against the hammer 130 which is in the forward fire position in
It will be appreciated that although the sear 124 is shown in a substantially vertical orientation when mounted in firearm 50, in other embodiments the actuator and sear may have different orientations depending on the particular type and design of the firearm and firing mechanism components. In other embodiments, it will further be appreciated that the hammer 130 may be replaced by an axially movable striker having a downwardly extending catch protrusion which may be selectively engaged/disengaged by the sear protrusion 123 of the sear 124 on the actuator using a similar methodology and approach to that described above for the hammer embodiment. The direct release embodiment of actuator 170 is expressly not limited in its applicability to either hammer or striker fired firearms but may be used with equal benefit in either type firing system.
In lieu of integrating the sear 124 into a single acting asymmetric actuator 170 as described above in a direct release mode of operation, a symmetric actuator such as actuator 100 in
Actuator 180 is operably coupled to the microcontroller 200 shown in
An example of the bistable dual acting actuator 180 of
Pistol 51 includes reciprocating slide 165, barrel 142 defining barrel bore 143, and firing pin 144. Slide 165 is slideably mounted to frame 126 and moves in a known reciprocating manner between rearward open breech and forward closed breech positions under recoil after the pistol is fired. A recoil spring 166 compressed by rearward movement of the slide acts to automatically return the slide forward to reclose the breech. Barrel 142 further includes chamber 150, rear breech end 148, and front muzzle end 173 similarly to firearm 50. The grip portion of frame 126 comprises a downwardly open magazine well which receives a removable ammunition cartridge magazine 169 therein for uploading cartridges automatically into the chamber 150 via operation of the slide 165. All of the foregoing components and operation of semi-automatic pistols are well known in the art without requiring further elaboration.
Pistol 51 further includes the microcontroller 200 and power source 122; both of which are operably and communicably connected to the actuator 180. Microcontroller 200 controls the operation and position of the actuator 180 via the control logic in the manner described elsewhere herein.
The firing mechanism of pistol 51 includes a trigger 132, hammer 130, and trigger bar 167 mechanically coupling the trigger to the hammer. Trigger 132 is pivotably mounted to frame 126 via transverse pivot pin 191 disposed below the trigger bar 167. The trigger bar in turn is movably coupled to an upward operating extension 193 of the trigger via transverse pin 192. The trigger bar 167 is axially and linearly movable in a forward path of travel Pt via pulling the trigger 132.
The actuator 180 may be located in the front of the trigger guard 184. An actuator placed in this location would allow for utilization of a space envelop that would not impact the primary mechanics of the firearm. The rotating member 104 of actuator 180 includes an outwardly and in this orientation of the actuator upwardly projecting operating protrusion 172. Operating protrusion 172 is moveable laterally and transversely (i.e. right side to left side) in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis LA of the firearm. In this embodiment upon pulling the trigger, the trigger bar linkage is either blocked from moving by the actuator 180 when the blocking protrusion 172 is in a blocking position to the left or free to travel for discharging the firearm when the blocking protrusion is in a non-blocking position to the right.
The rear end 175 of the trigger bar 167 is configured and arranged to engage a sear ledge 174 on the front of the hammer 130, which holds the hammer in the rearward cocked position. The front end 176 of the trigger bar is selectively blocked or unblocked by the blocking protrusion 172 of actuator 180. In the non-blocking position, the actuator operating protrusion 172 is laterally displaced and axially misaligned with a forward surface of the trigger bar 167 so that protrusion does not obstruct the linear path of travel Pt of the trigger bar. The trigger bar may therefore be fully actuated by pulling the trigger 132 to release the cocked hammer 130 and discharge the firearm. In the blocking position, the actuator operating protrusion 172 is axially aligned with the forward surface of the trigger bar 167 and obstructs the linear path of travel. Pulling the trigger bar will abuttingly engage the operating protrusion 172 with the trigger bar to prevent discharging the firearm. This type operation and functionality is optimal for a dual acting actuator moving under electrical power between two equal positions. The microcontroller 200 sends actuation signals to the actuator 180 to automatically select either the blocking or non-blocking positions.
The actuator 180 may be configured and arranged of course to block other portions of the trigger bar 167; an example of which is shown in
In this embodiment, the actuator 180 is located in the firearm forward of the trigger guard 184 and blocks the movement of the trigger 132 by means of a movable blocking member such as rotational safety linkage 185. Linkage 185 may be an elongated bar having a generally horizontal and axial orientation. Trigger 132 includes a forwardly projecting cantilevered operating extension 188 which is configured and operable to selectively engage the rear end 195 of the linkage 185. In one non-limiting embodiment, the rear end of linkage 185 may include an upright blocking protrusion 187 that engages the trigger extension 188; however, in other implementations the linkage may directly engage the trigger extension without the protrusion. The front end 194 of the rotational linkage 185 is configured with a slot 189 configured to operably engage the operating protrusion 172 of the actuator 180. A vertically oriented pivot pin 186 rotatably mounts the linkage to the firearm frame 126. The pin 186 defines a rotational axis of the linkage 185 which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis LA. Pivot pin 186 may be located between the opposite ends of linkage 185 at a suitable location to provide the desired lateral or transverse displacement of the rear end 195 of the linkage with respect to the trigger 132 when the linkage is rotated by the actuator at the front end 194. Linkage 185 is rotatable in a horizontal plane between a blocking position which prevent firing of the pistol 51 and a non-blocking position which permits firing the pistol.
It will be appreciated that use of the actuator 180 in a firing mechanism blocking function as described above with respect to
Actuator Position Sensing
Coils may be optimized for battery voltages within a firearm. Features in the actuator may be used to track the state of the actuator. For example, when the actuator changes state, there is a momentary change in the flux density in the driving coil. This will produce an inductive voltage event in the drive circuit. This may be exploited to terminate the actuator drive current at an optimal time as shown in
A secondary sensing coil may be used to produce an independent signal which the control or drive logic implemented by microcontroller 200 may use to determine when to terminate the actuation current as shown in
A hall-effect sensor 252 or alternatively a GMR (Giant Magnetoresistance Effect) sensor could alternatively be placed near the air gap at A and/or B to measure leakage flux at the air gap as shown in
The three above mentioned techniques for detecting actuator state may have significant impact on the commercial viability of an actuator, particularly actuators which are used asynchronously with the firing event. The closed loop feedback can also be a major advantage for synchronous applications.
Comparing
Control Logic
The use of a magnetic actuator to control actions within the firearm provides a direct replacement for the mechanical system of springs, cams, linkages, and sears and can be used to reduce cost of manufacturing, simplify tolerances of critical parts, improve functionality and timing, and modularize the fire control system. In its most basic form, a simple solid-state switching control circuit with battery (power source) for driving the actuator could be used as shown in
By replacing the simple circuitry with a programmable microprocessor such as microcontroller 200, however, the power, speed, and control and safety logic can be made highly adaptable and configurable.
Referring to
The communication module 209 comprises a communication port providing an input/output interface which is configured to enable two-way communications with the microcontroller and system. The communication module 163 further enables the programmable microcontroller 200 to communicate wirelessly wired with other remote electronic devices directly and/or over a wide area network. Such remote devices may include for example cellular phones, wearable devices (e.g. watches wrist bands, etc.), key fobs, tablets, notebooks, computers, servers, or the like. In certain systems configured with authentication as described herein, module 209 serves as the authentication communications gateway.
The display 205 may be a static or touch sensitive display in some embodiments of any suitable type for facilitating interaction with an operator. In other embodiments, the display may simply comprise status/action LEDs, lights, and/or indicators. In certain embodiments, the display 205 may be omitted and the programmable microcontroller 200 may communicate with a remote programmable user device via a wired or wireless connection using the wireless communication module 209 and use a display included with that remote unit for displaying information about the actuator system and firearm status.
A number of additional sensors operably and communicably connected to microcontroller 200 may be used and integrated into the actuator-based electronic firearm control system described herein besides a battery sensor 208, trigger sensor(s) 159, and actuator movement/status sensor. In one example, a grip force sensor may be used to both wake up and insure a valid intent-to-fire grip is maintained as shown in the control logic of
Another example of desirable sensors is an accelerometer or other motion sensing sensor to determine if the environment is safe. By monitoring the acceleration or motion of the firearm, the magnetic actuator can be disabled during undesirable conditions such as high acceleration caused by the user falling, tripping, being bumped or jarred, or exposure to other potential forces that could cause component failures. Thus in the presence of a high acceleration force, the control system could be configured to disable the firing mechanism due to the foregoing unsafe conditions.
One possible enhancement to the firearm control would be to sense the movement of the trigger using sensors 159 and actuate the firing event prior to the operator feeling the end of travel of a mechanical trigger when using the actuator in a firing mechanism release role as further described herein. This would enhance trigger follow-through and greatly reduce the operator effects of flinching as the firing event approaches. Additionally, since precise trigger event timing can be provided independent of the firing actuation event, the same firing actuator can be used with many different trigger force and displacement profiles.
One enhancement to the control system disclosed herein is the inclusion of one or more wireless communications options in some embodiments such as Bluetooth® (BLE), Near-Field Communication (NFC), LoRa, Wifi, etc. implemented via communications module 209 (see, e.g.
According to another aspect of the present invention, some embodiments may include the use of authentication technology to enable and disable the firearm from being capable of firing. For example, the control system of the present firearm may be configured to require authentication by the authorized user of the firearm before any one of the magnetic actuator embodiments disclosed herein can be actuated. Any suitable type of authentication system, protocol, and input mechanism may be used. As one non-limiting example, by using an input keypad located directly on the firearm or via a personal electronic device (e.g. handheld or wearable cell phone, watch, key fob, tablet, remote control, etc.), a personal identification PIN code could be entered to enable use of the firearm. Other Alternatives include an electronic touch token for unlocking the firearm control system, a fingerprint sensor, or multiple grip force and position sensors to identify and authorize a user.
One preferred but non-limiting authentication technology would be the use of a short-range non-contact authentication token in the form of a ring, wristband, medallion, pendent, or pocket size device as some examples. Other forms of authentication devices of course may be used in various embodiments. This non-contact authentication device could communicate directly with the firearm control system and indicate the presence of an authorized user via commercially available communications architectures such as Bluetooth BLE, NFC, LoRa, WiFi, Bodycom, or PKE (Passive Keyless Entry) While all of these architectures are viable, a preferred technology would be to use a low frequency (e.g. around 125 kHz) inductively coupled identification authenticator. Low frequency inductively coupled or capacitively coupled communications would provide a very controllable distance of operation between the authorization device and the actuator. Inductive coupling would provide the ability to have low power and simple circuits while being less sensitive to the shielding effects of metals and the human body between the actuator and firearm. Capacitive coupling would ensure the operator is actually holding the device.
One non-limiting preferred authentication system and control scenario is shown in the example system block diagram in
Referring to
The authentication control processes 400 and 500 of
In the approach taken in
If the self-test and battery test is passed, then an authorization test is performed in Step 406. The system will confirm that the firearm is authorized to be used by searching for an identification token as illustrated, or alternatively a valid input of a personal identification code or valid test of a biometric. If the authentication test fails, the system will indicate this failed authorization to the user and continue to attempt to authorize until a predefined and preprogrammed time-out limit is reached. If however the authorization test is positive, the microcontroller 200 will arm the firearm and continuously monitor for a trigger event and a number of other possible state change events with examples of some being indicated in
An example of one state change event that would effect authorization is the detection of loss of intent-to-fire grip that would indicate the user no longer has control of the firearm (Step 412). Another example would be the detection of an unsafe acceleration force detected by motion sensor 207 (Step 411), which is associated with falling or being bumped or jarred while holding the firearm. In the presence of a high acceleration force, the system disables the firing due to unsafe conditions. Another example would be the detection that the proximity to the identification token, or the time of a predefined timeframe for authentication has expired (Step 414). Loss of authentication will reset the authorized armed state of the firearm and disable operation of the firearm. Another example of state-change events would be the detection of a system error or the detection that the battery might not have sufficient remaining power to reliably actuate the magnetic actuator (Step 416). These types of faults and warning would also drop the firearm out of the authorized arm state and indicate a warning to the user.
An actuation event cycle also starts if a trigger event is detected by trigger sensor 159 in Step 410, and the firearm is authorized in an armed state and no state change event (Steps 411, 412, 414, or 416) has de-authorized the armed state as indicated above. Steps 422 through 430 represent a firing sequence for the firearm implemented by microcontroller 200. For safety, two independent trigger events, “Trigger Event 1” and “Trigger Event 2,” are preferred to initiate a valid trigger event; however, a single trigger event may be used in other embodiments. After the system detects Trigger Event 1 has occurred, the system then confirms that the firearm is still under the users physical control with an intent-to-fire grip (Step 422). The system then confirms the user's authorization criteria is still valid (Step 424). Next, the system detects whether an intent-to-fire Trigger Event 2 is activated. This provide the double layer of firing security. Assuming Steps 422, 424, and 426 are positive, the electronic safety shorting clamp is lifted (Step 428) to enable the firing mechanism and the actuation control signal is sent by microcontroller 200 to release the magnetic actuator 100 which discharges the firearm as previously described herein. As the actuator changes position (i.e. fires the gun), the feedback sensor detects and confirms that the actuator has transitioned (Step 432). As soon as the actuator state-change is detected, a control signal is removed to conserve power and decrease total cycle time. In a bistable release actuator application, a reset control signal is sent by microcontroller 200 immediately to the release actuator to move the actuator back to its starting state in preparation for the next triggering event as fast as possible (Step 434). If in Step 432 the feedback sensor fails to identify that the actuator 100 transitioned after a predefined time-out duration, the system will log an error but continue under the assumption that the actuator could have changed state. Under this condition, a reset control signal is sent after the timeout duration to attempt to move the actuator back to its starting state independent of the actual state of the actuator to ensure it is reset.
The rest of the firing and actuation cycle also includes the system sensing that the actuator has in fact physically reset (secondary part of Step 434), that trigger signals Trigger Event 1 and Trigger Event 2 are reset (Step 436), and finally that all ready-to-fire again conditions are met (Step 438).
While not shown, it should be noted that a momentary release actuator could be controlled similarly to that shown in
In the non-limiting example control logic flow process 500 shown in
If the self-test and battery test is passed, then an authorization test is performed in Step 506 (similarly to Step 406 in
If the authorization test conversely is positive, the firearm will attempt to authorize “Enable” the firearm by first checking that no high acceleration events are present that could inhibit proper performance of the actuator (Step 508). If successful, a control signal is sent to the actuator to change state. If high acceleration or motion indicates an unsafe environment, a predefined short delay (e.g. 100 milliseconds or other) is activated which allows a pause in the control flow to allow for the unsafe condition to be resolved, and/or a preprogrammed time-out limit (Step 507) is reached that causes the attempt to authorize to be aborted as an error which may be reported to the user.
If the system does not detect an unsafe acceleration condition in Step 508, microcontroller 200 generates and transmits a control signal that energizes the magnetic actuator 100 to change position (e.g. disabled position/state to enabled position/state) in Step 510. The firearm firing mechanism is now authorized and armed for firing using the trigger operated firing mechanism of the firearm. In Step 512, a feedback sensor (e.g. motion/displacement, proximity, or other type sensor, hall-effect sensor, sensing coil, or other means) determines that the actuator has physically transitioned to the enabled state. As soon as the actuator state-change is detected and confirmed by the system (i.e. positive response), the control signal may be removed by the system to conserve power. Control passes to Step 516.
If however the feedback sensor fails to identify that the actuator transitioned in Step 512 to the enabled state after a predefined time-out duration, the system would log an error and control continues under the assumption that the actuator 100 has not changed state. Under this condition, several attempts may be made by microcontroller 200 to retry transitioning the actuator (see Step 514 and return control loop). After a retry timeout period is reached in Step 514 without a confirmed actuator “enabled” state change, the system would log a hard error and report the “failure to enable” to the user. But this time, the assumption is that the actuator 100 may have changed state and is in fact in the “enabled” state. To ensure that the system is not left in a possible unconfirmed enabled state after this error, the firing mechanism of the firearm is disabled by the system (Step 515) which transmits a control signal to the actuator. In some embodiments, the system may be configured to execute several attempts to reset the actuator to the “disabled” state in Step 515. Control is returned to Step 502 from Step 515. In some embodiments, the system may be configured to confirm that the “disabled state” is in fact achieved by passing control from Step 515 to Steps 526-530 described below.
Once the system is in the confirmed “Enabled” state in Step 512, the system will transition into a monitoring state (Step 516) to detect conditions that would transition the actuator from its “Enabled” state back to the “Disabled” state.
If any of the foregoing status change events are detected, control passes to 526 and the system disabled the firing mechanism by transitioned the magnetic actuator 100 from the enabled state/position to the disabled state/position. In Step 528, the system may then attempt to confirm via a test that the actuator has physically transitioned to the “disabled” state via the same a feedback sensor (e.g. motion/displacement, proximity, or other type sensor, hall-effect sensor, sensing coil, or other). If the system cannot immediately confirm that the actuator is in the disabled state (i.e. negative response to the test), the system executes Step 530 to implement a return control loop that polls the system a preprogrammed period of time to find the presence of a control signal from the feedback sensor confirming that the actuator is in fact disabled. If in Step 530 the feedback sensor fails to identify that the actuator 100 transitioned to the disabled state after a predefined time-out duration, the system will log an error and report the condition to the operator/user. Control passes back to Step 502.
As soon as the actuator state-change is detected and confirmed by the system (i.e. positive response either immediately in Step 528 or after a period of time less than the time-out duration), the control signal may be removed by the system to conserve power. Control passes back to Step 502.
Options and Enhancements
Various features may be included in certain embodiments to increase the manufacturability of the actuator. These could include the design of a magnetic hinge. One such concept is shown in
The entire actuator may be encapsulated in a resin cured plastic to protect critical features from moisture, dirt and grime. The entire actuator may be overmolded into a plastic part in some embodiments. The magnetic material may be coated and/or plated. Ideally, the finished actuator module will represent a complete independent module that is protected from moisture, dirt and grime.
Alternative locations for the actuator could also include the rear area of the firearm (i.e. the grip region) interfacing with the intermediate linkage between the trigger and sear, or directly interfacing with the sear. The actuator could alternatively interface with an existing sear block safety, split trigger safety, trigger bar disconnect, magazine safety, or hammer or striker blocking means.
Another alternative embodiment would have the actuator in the bottom of the ammunition magazine with a blocking linkage extending up into the intermediate trigger transfer bar and blocking movement of the trigger from this location. By either limiting the number of rounds or increasing the size of the magazine baseplate, an electrical module containing an actuator, electronics, and battery could be contained in the bottom of the magazine in the baseplate. A direct or indirect linkage to interface with either a new or existing mechanical blocking safety means such as a sear block, trigger or trigger bar disconnect, magazine safety, manual safety, or striker or hammer blocking means would mate the magazine to the frame.
Another practical embodiment would be to locate the actuator in a axially reciprocating pistol slide and interfacing the actuator directly with a striker blocking means. The actuator could be contained in the slide above the centerline of the striker and interface with a new or existing striker blocking means independent of the firearm frame assembly. If the blocking actuator module is housed in a red-dot sight module, it could extend both down into the slide and above the slide as one module maximizing available space and sharing battery supply with the sight.
Yet another embodiment could place the actuator in the rear grip. A manual grip safety means that utilized the operator to provide the force and displacement of gripping the firearm to manually move a blocking linkage is a known firearm safety means. By combining the blocking actuator invention inside the grip safety, the actuator could be used to engage or disengage the function of the grip safety. Less actuator force and displacement would be required since the primary force and displacement for the safety function is provided by the operator gripping the firearm.
Embodiments of the present invention may be employed with any type of trigger-operated firearms or weapons including without limitation as some examples pistols, revolvers, long guns (e.g. rifles, carbines, shotguns), machine guns, grenade launchers, etc. Accordingly, the present invention is expressly not limited in its applicability. In addition to the foregoing small or light arms applications (i.e. personal weapons), embodiments of the invention may find applicability in certain crew-service large or heavy arms (e.g. infantry support weapons).
Sheathed Actuator Embodiment
Actuator 600 includes a stationary magnetic yoke assembly 601, movable rotating member 610, and electromagnetic coil 103 which is connected to an electrical power source, as previously described herein. Yoke assembly 601 includes an outer yoke 602 and a central inner yoke 604. The outer yoke 602 has an annular and circumferentially extending body with a generally C-shaped body configuration. Outer yoke 602 circumscribes a central space 603. Inner yoke 604 is nested inside the outer yoke 602 in the central space 603. Outer yoke 602 comprises a common horizontal top section 602A, downwardly extending vertical right and left sections 602B, 602C spaced laterally apart, and inwardly turned bottom sections 602D, 602E. The bottom sections are not joined and horizontally spaced apart to define a bottom gap or opening 605 which communicates with the central space 603 of the outer yoke.
The inner yoke 604 has a generally straight and vertically elongated body. Inner yoke 604 extends from the top portion 602A to the bottom portions 602D, 602E of the outer yoke 602. Inner yoke 604 may have a T-shaped body configuration including a top end portion 604A, bottom end portion 604B, and intermediate portion 604C extending therebetween. The intermediate portion 604C is orientated parallel to the right and left sections 602B, 602C of the outer yoke 602. The inner yoke 604 may have a substantially rectilinear transverse cross-sectional shape. Top end portion 604A of the inner yoke may be laterally/horizontally broadened and wider than the intermediate and bottom end portions. The bottom end portion 604B may define an arcuately convex end surface 606 which faces downwards. Surface 606 slideably engages complementary configured and arcuately concave surface 607 formed on the rotating member 610 which is upward facing when the rotating member is rotated.
In one embodiment, inner yoke 604 and outer yoke 602 may be formed as separate pieces which are assembled together. This simplifies fabrication of the yoke and rotating member components, and further allows placement of the rotating member inside the inner yoke. Inner yoke 604 may be split vertically or lengthwise in construction, and includes a front half-section 608 and rear half-section 607. This split casing arrangement of the inner yoke 604 facilitates assembly of the rotating member 610 thereto, as further described herein.
Each half-section 607, 608 of inner yoke 604 defines a portion of a longitudinal cavity 609 configured to pivotably receive rotating member 610 therein. Cavity 609 extends from and penetrates the top and bottom end portions 604A, 604B of the inner yoke. Referring particularly to
The half-sections 607 and 608 may be coupled together by any suitable mechanical coupling means, including for example without limitation adhesives, welding, soldering, interlocking protrusions and recesses, fasteners including screws and rivets, or other. In one embodiment, half-section 607 and half-section 608 may each include coupling features respectively to couple the half-sections together. The coupling features in one embodiment may comprise a pair of spaced apart tabs 620 formed on one half-section (e.g. rear half-section 607) which engage corresponding slots 621 formed on the other half-section (e.g. front half-section 608) to form an interlocked coupling arrangement. The arrangement of tabs and slots may be reversed on the half-sections and provides the same mechanical fastening capability. In one non-limiting configuration, the tabs 620 and slots 621 may be formed on the laterally widened top portions 604A of each half-section.
Inner yoke 604, when the half-sections 607, 608 are assembled, may be fixedly attached to the outer yoke 602. In one embodiment with general reference to
In one embodiment, outer yoke 602 may also have a split casing similar to inner yoke 604. Outer yoke 602 may therefore be formed of two vertically split front and rear half-sections 650A and 650B which are coupled together by any suitable mechanical means, such as for example without limitation adhesives, fasteners such as screws or rivets, welding or soldering, etc. In one embodiment, front half-section 650A includes a plurality of tabs 651 which are inserted into a corresponding plurality of slots 652 formed in rear half-section 650B (see, e.g.
Rotating member 610 has a vertically elongated body including a top operating end protrusion 630, bottom actuating end protrusion 631, and intermediate portion 632 extending therebetween. Both top operating end protrusion 630 and bottom actuating end protrusion 631 may be laterally/horizontally broadened relative to the intermediate portion 632 in one embodiment. In one embodiment, intermediate portion 632 may have parallel sides and be rectilinear in configuration and cross-sectional shape. Operating end protrusion 630 is configured to interface with the firing mechanism of the firearm. When the electromagnetic actuator 600 is fully assembled, the operating end protrusion projects upwards beyond the outer yoke 602 to engage a firing mechanism component or mechanical linkage that interfaces with the firing mechanism.
The actuating end protrusion 631 of rotating member 610 may have a generally double-faced hammer configuration that includes two opposite and outwardly facing side actuation surfaces 633. When the actuator 600 is cycled between its two actuation positions, the actuation surfaces 633 are arranged to alternatingly engage permanent magnets 105, 107 which are affixed to the outer yoke 602. Magnets 105, 107 may be deposed on opposite sides of the bottom opening 605 on the outer yoke 602. In other embodiments contemplated, magnets 105, 107 may instead be affixed to the actuation surfaces 633 of the rotating member 610 adjacent bottom opening 605. Alternatively, magnets 105, 107 may be disposed at other locations on the outer yoke 602 with one magnet each within the first magnetic flux circuit A and magnetic flux circuit B (see also
Rotating member 610 may be pivotably mounted to inner yoke 604 via a pivot protuberance such as pin 614 that defines a pivot axis. Pivot pin 614 defines a center of rotation CR about which the rotating member 610 pivots or rotates. In one embodiment, rotating member 610 is movably disposed inside longitudinal cavity 609 of the inner yoke 604, and may be almost completely enclosed therein except for the operating and actuating end protrusions 630, 631 located outside the cavity. In one embodiment, pivot pin 614 may have a fixed end coupled to rear half-section 607 in cavity 609 and extends horizontally therefrom. The free end of pin 614 is received in a socket 615 formed in the front half-section 608 having a complementary configuration to the cross sectional shape of the pin. In one embodiment, the pin and socket may have a circular cross section; however, other cross-sectional shapes such as polygonal may be used. In an alternative possible embodiment, the rotating member 610 may instead comprise a pin which extends forward and rearward therefrom and the two ends of the pins are received in sockets 615 formed in both the front and rear half-sections 608, 607 of the inner yoke 604. This arrangement provides the same pivotable coupling and action of the rotating member 610.
Pivot pin 614 defines a third coupling feature which couples the front and rear half-sections 607, 608 together in addition to pivotably mounting the rotating member 610 in the inner yoke 604. It bears noting that the inner yoke 604 defines a vertical central axis CA of the actuator 600 about which rotating member 610 rotates or pivots. The pivot pin 614 is received through a mounting hole 635 formed in the intermediate portion 632 of the rotating member 610 to mount it to the inner yoke 604. A pair of arcuate convex lateral surfaces 634A may be formed on opposite side portions of the intermediate portion 632 surrounding hole 635 which rotatably and slideably engage corresponding arcuate concave surfaces 634B formed around pin 614 on inner yoke half-section 607 in cavity 609 (see, e.g.
In one embodiment, the center of rotation CR of the rotating member 610 preferably is sufficiently close to a center of mass CM of the rotating member such that random linear acceleration forces acting on the actuator 600 from any direction will not generate sufficient force to overcome the static holding torque of the permanent magnets 105, 107 in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Advantageously, this provides a fast acting and dynamically stable design which is resistant to changing position due to imposed external acceleration forces or impacts such as experienced in firearm drop tests and normal operation. Determination of such an arrangement and positioning of the CR and CM with respect to what is considered “sufficiently close” can be calculated according to the method already described herein discussing drop compliance design of an electromagnetic actuator. In one embodiment, the centers of rotation CR and mass CM may be coaxial. For the configuration of rotating member 610 shown, the center of mass CM and rotation CR are located more proximately and closer to the larger heavier bottom actuating end protrusion 631 of the rotating member than the smaller lighter top operating end protrusion 630 in order to dynamically balance the rotating member.
Longitudinal cavity 609 of the inner yoke 604 is configured to allow full pivotable actuation movement of the rotating member 610 about pivot pin 614. To achieve this with reference to
Actuator 600 operates in a similar manner to that previously described herein for dynamically balanced and symmetric bistable electromagnetic actuators. Accordingly, its operation will not be described in detail for sake of brevity. Generally, applying an electric current to coil 103 wound around inner yoke 604 creates a first magnetic flux circuit A and a second magnetic flux circuit B with lines of flux as shown in
Applying electric current to the coil 103 and changing/reversing polarity causes the rotating member 610 of actuator 600 to alternatingly pivot or tilt back and forth from side to side in a rocking motion. Rotating member 610 is pivotably movable between a first actuation position (see, e.g.
When actuator 600 is in the first actuation position shown in
The stationary yoke 601, including outer and inner yokes 602, 604, and the rotating member 104 may be formed of any suitable ferromagnetic metal capable of being magnetized, such as without limitation iron, steel, nickel, etc. In one embodiment, these parts may be formed by metal injection molding. However, other suitable fabrication methods may be used including casting, forging, machining, extrusions, etc.
A method for assembling actuator 600 will now be summarized. Referring generally to
It bears noting that because the rotating member 610 is movably disposed inside the central inner yoke 604 (which remains stationary during movement of the rotating member), the coil 103 wound around the inner yoke does not bind or interfere with the movement of the rotating member whatsoever to ensure fast snap-like action between the two actuation positions.
Although the inner yoke 604 is disclosed and shown as a discrete or separate part from the outer yoke 602, the invention is not so limited. In other possible embodiments, the rear half-section 607 of inner yoke 604 may be formed as an integral unitary and monolithic structural part of the rear half-section 650B of outer yoke 602. The same may be done for the front half-sections 608 and 650A of the inner and outer yokes 604 and 602, respectively. The rotating member 610 may still be installed in the same manner described above in cavity 609 of the inner yoke 604, and the half-sections of the monolithic inner yoke and outer yoke may be coupled together in a single step. Coil 103 may then be wound around the completed yoke assembly 601.
It will be appreciated that aspects of electromagnetic actuator 600 have been described with respect to vertical or horizontal orientation of various components for ease of description only. The actuator 600 may be mounted and used in any orientation necessary which is dictated by the specific application without any adverse effect on the actuators performance and operations. Accordingly, these orientations are not limiting of the actuator or invention.
Coil Assembly Mounted Rotating Member Embodiment
Coil spool 670 may include a top flange 671, intermediate flange 672, and bottom flange 673. The flanges 671-673 are engaged with and supported by the outer yoke 602 as shown to provide a stable coil mounting. A vertically elongated longitudinal central section 674 extends from the top flange 671 to the bottom flange 673 along central axis CA. Central section 671 may have a lateral width less than the flanges 671-673 and defines outwardly open receptacles for receiving and retaining the coil windings which are wound around the central section. Flanges 671-673 may have a lateral width at least the same or larger than the coil 103 to protect the windings.
Coil spool 670 in one embodiment may be made of a non-metal material such as a suitable plastic. Spool 670 may therefore not be a magnetic material like outer yoke 602 and rotating member 610. The opposing lines of magnetic flux in actuator 610A will flow through the rotating member 610 alone, unlike actuator 600 in which the lines of flux flow through both the rotating member and inner yoke 604.
Central section 671 defines longitudinal cavity 609A which is configured the same in all aspects as cavity 609 defined by the inner yoke 604 in the embodiment of actuator 600 shown in
As shown and described herein, the laterally elongated top operating end protrusion 630 and bottom actuating end protrusion 631 may be laterally wider than the vertically elongated intermediate portion 632 of the rotating member 610. To allow mounting and placement of the rotating member 610 inside cavity 609A, the coil spool 670 may be formed in a front half-section 670A and rear half-section 670B in a similar manner to inner yoke 604. The half-sections 670A, 670B may be joined together by any suitable mechanical means after the rotating member 610 is mounted in cavity 609A, such as for example by adhesives, fasteners, pins, rivets, sonic welding, etc.
It bears noting that the intermediate flange 672 provides additional lateral support for the pivot pin 614. However, in some embodiments, the intermediate flange 672 may be omitted. The center of mass CM is sufficiently close to the center of rotation CR of the rotating member such that random linear acceleration forces acting on the actuator from any direction will not generate sufficient force to overcome the static holding torque of the permanent magnets in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation and change position of the actuator. CM may therefore be substantially coaxial with CR.
Actuator 600A is the same as actuator 600 in all other aspects, features, and functionality as previously described. Accordingly, it will not be repeated here for the sake of brevity.
In operation, a trigger sensor 159 operates in a manner previously described herein and communicates a trigger pull action to the microcontroller 200, which in turn activates and changes position of the actuator 170 form a first position to a second position. The sear protrusion 123 disengages the striker catch protrusion 702 and releases the striker 700 from the cocked position. The forward end of the striker 700 strikes and detonates the cartridge as the strike moves forward. The reciprocating slide 165 or another moving part of the firearm action having a reset surface (not shown) travels rearward under recoil engaging the reset protrusion 161. This toggles the actuator (i.e. rotating member 104) from the second position back to the first position. The striker catch protrusion 702 re-engages the sear protrusion 123 to restrain the striker 700 in the rearward cocked and ready-to-fire position again. In other embodiments, the actuator may be reset by the microcontroller 200 from the second to first position in lieu of a physical moving part of the firearm action. In this case, the microcontroller 200 implements a timer or relies on an actuator position sensor previously described herein to detect when the rotating member 104 should be reset to the starting actuation position.
While the embodiments and the examples of control flow for the fast action shock invariant magnetic actuator discussed here all relate to the application in firearms, it is apparent to those skilled in the art that a fast action shock invariant magnetic actuator is directly applicable to other applications that need a small, battery powered fast acting actuation means that must survive in a high shock environment. The actuator trigger event signal can be considered as the stimulus of any number of access control problems. One apparent application would be a fast action actuator and authentication control scheme for use securing a firearm in a lock box application or locking holster. Other applications as introduced early include application to less-lethal weapons (stun guns, pellet guns, tear gas launchers, paintball guns), power tools (drills staple guns, nail guns, pneumatic tools), military applications (small arms, crew served weapons, machine guns), as well as the actuator for access control such as gun holsters, door locks, storage boxes and containers, and any number of replacement applications where other mechanical or electromechanical actuators are used.
It bears noting that any of the various actuator embodiments disclosed herein may be interchangeably used or combined in any of the potential applications described herein. Accordingly, although one embodiment of an actuator may be shown in a particular application as applied to the firing mechanism of a firearm, it will be understood than any of the other configuration and type of actuators disclosed may be substituted unless expressly stated otherwise. The invention is therefore not limited by the particular actuator shown in the figures, which merely represent non-limiting examples for convenience of description only.
It further bears noting that any of the various actuator embodiments disclosed herein may be configured and operated under control of microcontroller 200 as appropriately programmed in any of the ways or operating modes described herein (e.g. direct acting or indirect acting, asynchronous or synchronous, asymmetric or symmetric, fixed timed event or momentary event, single acting or dual acting, etc.). The operating mode may be selected based on the intended application.
While the foregoing description and drawings represent exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, it will be understood that various additions, modifications and substitutions may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope and range of equivalents of the accompanying claims. In particular, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in other forms, structures, arrangements, proportions, sizes, and with other elements, materials, and components, without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. In addition, numerous variations in the methods/processes described herein may be made within the scope of the present disclosure. One skilled in the art will further appreciate that the embodiments may be used with many modifications of structure, arrangement, proportions, sizes, materials, and components and otherwise, used in the practice of the disclosure, which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements without departing from the principles described herein. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. The appended claims should be construed broadly, to include other variants and embodiments of the disclosure, which may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and range of equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/908,874 filed Mar. 1, 2018, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/468,679 filed Mar. 8, 2017. The foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1875941 | Schwartz | Sep 1932 | A |
2424247 | Mccaslin | Jul 1947 | A |
2702841 | Bernstein | Feb 1955 | A |
2780882 | Temple | Feb 1957 | A |
2978825 | Tichenor | Apr 1961 | A |
3065560 | Bumiller | Nov 1962 | A |
3184651 | Albosta | May 1965 | A |
4009536 | Wolff | Mar 1977 | A |
4236132 | Zimmimopoulos | Nov 1980 | A |
4682435 | Heltzel | Jul 1987 | A |
5619817 | Jones et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5713150 | Ealovega | Feb 1998 | A |
6293039 | Fuchs | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6442880 | Allan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6732464 | Kurvinen | May 2004 | B2 |
6760992 | Brosow | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6843014 | Aponte et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7049915 | Delamare et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7886471 | Glock | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8234969 | Beckmann | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8418391 | Kemmerer et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8461951 | Gassmann et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8522466 | Arduini | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8677665 | Huber | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8692636 | Reuber | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9190234 | Reuber | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9222743 | Shah et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9250030 | Henry | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9261315 | Travis | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9341425 | Carlson | May 2016 | B2 |
9347723 | Burdine | May 2016 | B2 |
9354010 | McCulloch | May 2016 | B1 |
9354011 | Cooke et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9377259 | Milde et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9395134 | Swensen | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9441896 | Allan | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9488427 | Lucero | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9557129 | Lupher et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9599418 | Steele | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9784516 | Murphy, II et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9823047 | Lupher et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9841249 | Nicks et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9857133 | Kloepfer et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9879932 | Milde et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10001335 | Patterson et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10107579 | Winiecki | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10113823 | Alicea, Jr. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10126080 | Martin | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10228208 | Galie et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10240881 | Galle et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
20010032407 | Cain et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20150040453 | Ballard et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150377574 | Cooke et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160054081 | Creed | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061549 | Patterson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160091267 | Mascorro | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160138881 | Travis | May 2016 | A1 |
20160209141 | Lampela et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160233012 | Lubinski et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160252317 | Biran et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160258701 | Carlson | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160273859 | Milde et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160298920 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160327356 | Milde et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160341506 | Steele | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160348994 | Allan | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170010062 | Black et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170102199 | Alicea, Jr. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170219306 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170234636 | Hafen | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170234637 | Patel | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170299301 | Gant et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170328661 | Milde, Jr. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170363380 | Alicea, Jr. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180031345 | Winiecki et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180058786 | Carlson | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180066910 | Biran | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
PI0701574 | Jan 2009 | BR |
1142783 | Mar 1983 | CA |
1285801 | Jul 1991 | CA |
2568329 | Dec 2005 | CA |
419899 | Aug 1966 | CH |
104075619 | Oct 2014 | CN |
105488480 | Apr 2016 | CN |
105612400 | May 2016 | CN |
105823376 | Aug 2016 | CN |
205843484 | Dec 2016 | CN |
205879007 | Jan 2017 | CN |
107004309 | Aug 2017 | CN |
107578493 | Jan 2018 | CN |
206862203 | Jan 2018 | CN |
206974276 | Feb 2018 | CN |
105865260 | Sep 2018 | CN |
731655 | Jun 1979 | DE |
2926559 | Jan 1981 | DE |
3446019 | Jun 1986 | DE |
3516202 | Jun 1986 | DE |
4303333 | Jun 1994 | DE |
102005040302 | Mar 2007 | DE |
202013005117 | Jul 2013 | DE |
1074810 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1132929 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2330375 | Jun 2011 | EP |
3060870 | Aug 2016 | EP |
3093606 | Nov 2016 | EP |
2887003 | Dec 2016 | EP |
2887002 | Jan 2017 | EP |
3239643 | Nov 2017 | EP |
2599959 | Feb 2017 | ES |
2604474 | Mar 2017 | ES |
2794853 | Oct 2002 | FR |
224319 | Nov 1924 | GB |
271925 | May 1927 | GB |
2340589 | Feb 2000 | GB |
201821002803 | Sep 2018 | IN |
20000133091 | May 2000 | JP |
2001021290 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2000133091 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001250716 | Sep 2001 | JP |
3240351 | Dec 2001 | JP |
200363194495 | Jul 2003 | JP |
4887993 | Feb 2012 | JP |
5613731 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2016537602 | Dec 2016 | JP |
20160016122 | Feb 2016 | KR |
101652077 | Sep 2016 | KR |
20180086869 | Aug 2018 | KR |
20180114377 | Oct 2018 | KR |
210457 | Oct 1988 | NZ |
210457 | Jul 1998 | NZ |
2101839 | Jan 1998 | RU |
WO199744630 | Nov 1997 | WO |
2005116567 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2005116567 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO14130625 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO14142920 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO15066744 | May 2015 | WO |
WO2016109756 | Jul 2016 | WO |
WO16134851 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO19052621 | Mar 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Author: Moving Magnet Technologies SA, Bistable Actuators Actuators and Solenoids for stable positions without current; See description and rotary actuator figure. Internet site: http://www.movingmagnet.com/en/bistable-actuators-rotary-solenoids/ printed Jun. 19, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62468679 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15908874 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16265077 | US |