The present disclosure relates to envelope following systems and to methods that allow for fast calibration of envelope following systems in a factory environment.
Use of envelope following techniques for linear modulation is highly desirable for long term evolution (LTE) customers and others in the years to come, because envelope following and pseudo-envelope following enables a very efficient use of energy. However, using envelope following techniques adds production line calibration requirements that may become a burden to phone manufacturers due to excessive calibration time overhead. For the purpose of this disclosure, envelope following systems include pseudo-envelope following systems, wherein pseudo-envelope following is envelope tracking that includes power amplifier (PA) collector/drain voltage pre-distortion to ameliorate power amplifier nonlinearity. It should be understood that envelope following is sometimes referred to as envelope tracking by some.
Envelope following systems are power management systems that control power amplifiers (PAs) in such a way that PA collector/drain voltage (referred to herein as Vcc) follows an RF input signal envelope, which is an instantaneous voltage of a PA input RF signal, (referred to herein as VIN). Implementing pseudo-envelope following improves overall efficiency of PA systems because a power management function is realized using high efficiency switcher systems. However, a modulation of collector voltage results in some detrimental side effects due to the physics of transistors. One such detrimental side effect is gain modulation. For example, PA gain depends on Vcc, thus modulating PA collector also voltage modulates PA gain that creates a significant nonlinearity.
Traditionally, the problem of nonlinearity is solved in pseudo-envelope following systems by following a supply voltage/input power (Vcc/PIN) curve for which gain remains constant. The Vcc/PIN curve is known as an isogain curve and a related Vcc/VIN rule is programmed into a special look-up table (LUT) that is included in a phone's transceiver circuitry. What is needed is fast calibration methods that use the phone's transceiver circuitry to relatively quickly complete a calibration procedure that produces results that are usable to generate the special LUT.
In general, fast pseudo-envelope system calibration methods of the present disclosure are implemented using a calibration subsystem that is relatively autonomous. In this way, time consuming interactions with a production tester on a phone production line are limited.
In particular, the present disclosure provides a transceiver for an envelope following system that includes a power amplifier (PA) having a signal input, a signal output, and a power input that receives power from a power management system that modulates a supply voltage provided to the PA in response to an envelope signal. The transceiver includes the calibration subsystem, which is adapted to provide a first test signal to the signal input of the PA and to provide a second test signal to the power management system in place of the envelope signal. The calibration subsystem is programmed with calibration methods that sweep the first or second test signal through a first range and to sweep the second or first test signal through a second range in order to derive values that make up a pseudo-envelope look-up table (LUT) that is usable by the transceiver.
In at least one embodiment, the transceiver further includes a power measurement circuit adapted to measure power associated with the signal output of the PA as the PA responds to the first test signal and the second test signal. Moreover, the transceiver also includes a memory for storing power measurement data points along with corresponding data points of the first test signal and corresponding data points of the second test signal.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
An IQ delay 22 delays the I and Q signals by a programmable amount of time to ensure that the I and Q signals are synchronized with the pre-distorted envelope signal. An I/Q multiplexer (MUX) 24 selectively switches the I signal to an input of a first digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 26. A first low pass filter 28 filters an analog I signal that is output from the first DAC 26. A first mixer 30 mixes the analog I signal with an in-phase RF signal generated by an oscillator 32.
The I/Q multiplexer 24 also selectively switches the Q signal to an input of a second DAC 34. A second low pass filter 36 filters an analog Q signal that is output from the second DAC 34. A second mixer 38 mixes the analog Q signal with a quadrature RF signal generated by the oscillator 32. Mixers 30 and 38 and the RF source 32 comprise an RF quadrature modulator. It is to be understood that other types of IQ to RF modulators are usable without deviating from the scope of the present disclosure. A programmable attenuator 40 is usable to adjust the amplitude of the RF signal resulting from the mixing of the analog I signal and analog Q signal with the RF signal. A power amplifier (PA) 42 receives and amplifies the RF signal to a desired level.
An envelope multiplexer 44 selectively switches the digital envelope signal to an input of a third DAC 46. A third low pass filter 48 filters an analog envelope signal that is output from the third DAC 46. A power management integrated circuit (PMIC) 50 receives the analog envelope after filtering and uses the analog envelope signal to modulate Vcc that is output to supply PA 42 with power.
A calibration subsystem 52 provides an I calibration signal (I_CAL) and a Q calibration signal (Q_CAL) to the I/Q multiplexer 24. The calibration subsystem 52 also provides a first envelope calibration signal (ENV_CAL 1) to the envelope multiplexer 44 as well as a second envelope calibration signal (ENV_CAL 2) to the programmable attenuator 40.
The calibration subsystem 52 also receives a detector input signal (DET_IN) that is made up of digital values that quantify the output power provided by the PA 42 during a calibration operation. A memory 54 that serves as a calibration data buffer stores the digital values of the DET_IN signal.
A sample of output power is taken from an output of PA 42 using a coupler 56. A power detector 58 detects the sample of output power. The power detector 58 can be, but is not limited to, a diode based detector, a logarithmic amplifier/detector, IQ receiver, and a receiver path, etc. A fourth filter 60 receives and filters a detected power output from the power detector 58. An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 62 receives the detected power output after filtering. The ADC 62 converts the detected power output into the digital values of the DET_IN signal upon receiving a strobe signal (STROBE) from the calibration subsystem 52. It is to be understood that the calibration subsystem 52 can be implemented in hardware and or software on transceiver 10 and/or on a baseband processor (not shown).
The calibration data buffer 54 (
Next, the 2D sweep algorithm determines if final values for I and Q have been processed (step 116). If no, then the I and Q DAC values are incremented (step 118) and steps 110, 112, 114, and 116 are repeated. If yes, the 2D sweep algorithm determines if the final envelope value has been processed (step 120). If no, the envelope DAC values are incremented (step 122) and steps 108, 110, 112, 114, and 116 are repeated. In one embodiment, the envelope data value and the I and Q DAC values are incremented linearly, and in another embodiment, the envelope data value and the I and Q DAC values are incremented exponentially.
If the final envelope value is determined to have been processed (step 120), then the contents of the calibration data buffer 54 is transferred to an external device (not shown) (step 124). The calibration subsystem 52 switches the I/Q multiplexer 24 and the envelope multiplexer 44 from the calibration mode to the normal mode (step 126).
Next, the I, Q, and envelope DACs are loaded with I, Q, and envelope words (step 214). A delay then waits for VCC, PIN and VDET to reach steady state (step 216). After the delay, the average PA power is measured (step 218). Then the I, Q, and envelope DACs are loaded with pulse off values (step 220). The average PA power value is then stored in the calibration data buffer 54 (step 222).
The pulsed RF 2D sweep algorithm then determines if the final I and the final Q value have been processed (step 224). If no, the I and Q DAC words are incremented (step 226) and the steps 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, and 224 are repeated. If yes, the pulsed RF 2D algorithm determines if the final envelope value has been processed (step 228). If no, the envelope word is incremented or decremented depending on the direction of the sweep (step 230) and the steps 210 through 224 are repeated until the final I and Q values are processed. The pulsed RF 2D sweep algorithm then determines if the final envelope value has been processed (step 228). If yes, the contents of the calibration data buffer 54 are sent to an external device (step 232) and the envelope multiplexer 44 is switched from the calibration mode to the normal mode (step 234).
The pseudo-envelope generating algorithm then determines if a last measurement data word has been processed (step 310). If no, then another measurement data word is received 302, and steps 304, 306, 308, and 310 are repeated. If a last measurement data word is determined to have been processed (step 310), then a Vcc/PIN curve for an isogain target is computed using SYSTEMGAIN calculations (step 312). Next, VIN/IQ values from the Vcc/PIN curve are derived to generate a pseudo-envelope look-up table (LUT) (step 314). The pseudo-envelope LUT is then transferred to a phone that includes the calibration subsystem 52 (
A zoomed portion of the waveforms is shown to the right of the waveforms. Notice that the Vramp signal, the Vcc signal and the ABS(IQ) signal is made up of a series of pulses. The detector voltage VDET is averaged by the pulsed RF 2D sweep algorithm of
Due to the nature of isogain curves, Vcc is relatively proportional to the input voltage VIN when the PA 42 (
Referring to both
Two-segment piecewise linear Vcc(VIN) functions are usable to keep a definition of boundaries for the bounded areas simple to allow a cost effective silicon implementation of the 2D algorithm. In operation, an exponential sweep begins at one boundary and stops at another.
The third DAC 46 (
The 2D sweep algorithm then determines if final values for I and Q have been processed (step 414). If no, then the I and Q DAC values are incremented or decremented depending on a desired sweep direction (step 416) and steps 410, 412, and 414 are repeated. The 2D sweep algorithm then determines if a final envelope value has been processed (step 418). If no, the envelope DAC value is incremented or decremented depending on the desired sweep direction (step 420) and the steps 406 through 414 are repeated. If the final envelope value is determined to have been processed (step 418), then the calibration subsystem 52 switches the I/Q multiplexer 24 and the envelope multiplexer 44 from the calibration mode to the normal mode (step 422). In one embodiment, the envelope data value and the I and Q DAC values are incremented linearly, and in another embodiment, the envelope data value and the I and Q DAC values are incremented exponentially. Executing the sweeps from maximum values down to minimum values is another way to trigger the external test equipment.
The pulsed RF 2D sweep algorithm then determines if the final I and final Q value have been processed (step 522). If no, the I and Q DAC words are incremented (step 524) and the steps 512, 514, 516, 518, 520, and 522 are repeated. The pulsed RF 2D sweep algorithm then determines if the final envelope value has been processed (step 526). If no, the envelope word is incremented or decremented depending on the direction of the envelope sweep (step 528) and the steps 510 through 522 are repeated. If yes, the envelope multiplexer 44 is switched from the calibration mode to the normal mode (step 530).
During the completion of the 2D sweep algorithm (
The pseudo-envelope LUT generating algorithm then determines if a last measurement data word has been processed (step 618). If no, then another measurement data word is retrieved (step 608) and steps 610, 612, 614, 616, and 618 are repeated. If a last measurement data word is determined to have been processed (step 618), then a Vcc/PIN curve for an isogain target is computed using SYSTEMGAIN calculations (STEP 620). Next, VIN/IQ values from the Vcc/PIN curve are derived to generate a pseudo-envelope LUT (step 622). The pseudo-envelope LUT is then transferred to the phone being calibrated (step 624).
The calibration data buffer 54 (
In preparation for the successive approximation procedure, bits making up the value for the envelope DAC are set to zero (step 712). Next, the most significant bit (MSB) of the envelope DAC is addressed (step 714) and the addressed envelope DAC bit is set to one (step 716). The successive approximation algorithm then waits for the detector voltage VDET to reach steady state (step 718). Once VDET steady state is reached, the output power is measured (step 720).
The successive approximation algorithm then determines if the measured VDET is greater than the VDET target (step 722). If yes, the addressed bit is set to zero (step 724). If no, the successive approximation algorithm determines if the least significant bit (LSB) of the envelope DAC is addressed (step 726). If no, the next lower bit of the envelope DAC is addressed (step 728) and steps 716, 718, 720, and 722 are repeated. If the successive approximation algorithm determines that the LSB of the envelope detector has been addressed, the envelope DAC value is stored to a pseudo-envelope following LUT (step 730).
Next, the successive approximation algorithm determines if the last VIN target LUT value has been reached (step 732). If not, the next VIN target LUT value is addressed (step 734) and steps 708 through 722 are repeated. Conversely, if the last VIN target LUT value has been processed, the calibration subsystem 52 switches the I/Q multiplexer 24 and the envelope multiplexer 44 from calibration mode to normal mode (step 736).
The calibration data buffer 54 (
In preparation for the successive approximation procedure, bits making up the value for the envelope word are set to zero (step 812). Next, the most significant bit (MSB) of the envelope word is addressed (step 814) and set the addressed envelope word bit to one (step 816). The successive approximation algorithm then waits for a pulse off duration (step 818). The I, Q, and envelope DACs are loaded with I, Q, and envelope words (step 820). The successive approximation algorithm then waits for VDET to reach steady state (step 822). Once VDET steady state is reached, the average VDET is measured (step 824). Next, the I, Q, and envelope DACs are loaded with pulse off values (step 826).
The successive approximation algorithm then determines if the measured VDET is greater than the VDET target (step 828). If yes, the addressed bit is set to zero (step 830). If no, the successive approximation algorithm determines if the least significant bit (LSB) of the envelope DAC is addressed (step 832). If no, the next lower bit of the envelope word is addressed (step 834) and steps 816, 818, 820, 822, 824, 826 and 828 are repeated. If the successive approximation algorithm determines that the measured VDET is greater than the VDET target (step 828) while the LSB of the envelope word is addressed (832), the envelope DAC value is stored to a pseudo-envelope following LUT (step 836).
Next, the successive approximation algorithm determines if the last VIN target LUT value has been reached (step 838). If not, the next VIN target LUT value is addressed (step 840) and steps 810 through 838 are repeated. Conversely, if the last VIN target LUT value has been processed, the calibration subsystem 52 switches the I/Q multiplexer 24 and the envelope multiplexer 44 from calibration mode to normal mode (step 842).
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/438,755, filed Feb. 2, 2011, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4996500 | Larson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5311309 | Ersoz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5351087 | Christopher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5414614 | Fette et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420643 | Romesburg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5486871 | Filliman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5532916 | Tamagawa | Jul 1996 | A |
5581454 | Collins | Dec 1996 | A |
5646621 | Cabler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715526 | Weaver, Jr. et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5822318 | Tiedemann, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5898342 | Bell | Apr 1999 | A |
5905407 | Midya | May 1999 | A |
5936464 | Grondahl | Aug 1999 | A |
6043610 | Buell | Mar 2000 | A |
6043707 | Budnik | Mar 2000 | A |
6055168 | Kotowski et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070181 | Yeh | May 2000 | A |
6118343 | Winslow | Sep 2000 | A |
6141541 | Midya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147478 | Skelton et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6198645 | Kotowski et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6204731 | Jiang et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6256482 | Raab | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300826 | Mathe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6348780 | Grant | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6559689 | Clark | May 2003 | B1 |
6617930 | Nitta | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621808 | Sadri | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624712 | Cygan et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658445 | Gau et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681101 | Eidson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690652 | Sadri | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701141 | Lam | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6728163 | Gomm et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6819938 | Sahota | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6995995 | Zeng et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7058373 | Grigore | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7164893 | Leizerovich et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7233130 | Kay | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7411316 | Pai | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7528807 | Kim et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7529523 | Young et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7539466 | Tan et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7595569 | Amerom et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609114 | Hsieh et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7615979 | Caldwell | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627622 | Conrad et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7646108 | Paillet et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7696735 | Oraw et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715811 | Kenington | May 2010 | B2 |
7724837 | Filimonov et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7773691 | Khlat et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777459 | Williams | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782036 | Wong et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7805115 | McMorrow et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7859336 | Markowski et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880547 | Lee et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7907010 | Wendt et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7994864 | Chen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000117 | Petricek | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008970 | Homol et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8026765 | Giovannotto | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8068622 | Melanson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8081199 | Takata et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8093951 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8164388 | Iwamatsu | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8174313 | Vice | May 2012 | B2 |
8198941 | Lesso | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204456 | Xu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020071497 | Bengtsson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030017286 | Williams et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031271 | Bozeki et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030062950 | Hamada et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030137286 | Kimball et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030206603 | Husted | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220953 | Allred | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030232622 | Seo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040047329 | Zheng | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040124913 | Midya et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040196095 | Nonaka | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219891 | Hadjichristos | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040266366 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267842 | Allred | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008093 | Matsuura et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032499 | Cho | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047180 | Kim | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064830 | Grigore | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093630 | Whittaker et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122171 | Miki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156662 | Raghupathy et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050157778 | Trachewsky et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060128324 | Tan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178119 | Jarvinen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181340 | Dhuyvetter | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060244513 | Yen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070014382 | Shakeshaft et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024360 | Markowski | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070183532 | Matero | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070259628 | Carmel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080044041 | Tucker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081572 | Rofougaran | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080150619 | Lesso et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080205095 | Pinon et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242246 | Minnis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252278 | Lindeberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280577 | Beukema et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090004981 | Eliezer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090097591 | Kim | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090167260 | Pauritsch et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174466 | Hsieh et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190699 | Kazakevich et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090218995 | Ahn | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090289720 | Takinami et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319065 | Risbo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017553 | Laurencin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100171553 | Okubo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100301947 | Fujioka et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308654 | Chen | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100311365 | Vinayak et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321127 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110018626 | Kojima | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110084760 | Guo et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110148375 | Tsuji | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110235827 | Lesso et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120034893 | Baxter et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120068767 | Henshaw et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120133299 | Capodivacca et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139516 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170334 | Menegoli et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120176196 | Khlat | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120236444 | Srivastava et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130034139 | Khlat et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0755121 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1492227 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1569330 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2214304 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2244366 | Oct 2010 | EP |
2462204 | Feb 2010 | GB |
2465552 | May 2010 | GB |
0048306 | Aug 2000 | WO |
04002006 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004082135 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005013084 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006073208 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Li et al., “A highly efficient SiGe differential power amplifier using an envelope-tracking technique for 3GPP LTE applications,” IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM), Oct. 4-6, 2010, pp. 121-124. |
Cidronali, A. et al., “A 240W dual-band 870 and 2140 MHz envelope tracking GaN PA designed by a probability distribution conscious approach,” IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Jun. 5-10, 2011, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/061007 mailed Aug. 16, 2012, 16 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/024124 mailed Aug. 24, 2012, 14 pages. |
International Search Report for US PCT/US2012/036858 mailed Aug. 9, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Search Report for US PCT/US2012/036858 mailed Aug. 10, 2012, 8 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/023495 mailed May 7, 2012, 13 pages. |
Hekkala, A. et al., “Adaptive time misalignment compensation in envelope tracking amplifiers,” International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications, Aug. 2008, pp. 761-765. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Where Applicable Protest Fee for PCT/US2012/024124 mailed Jun. 1, 2012, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,024, mailed Jun. 18, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/054106 mailed Apr. 11, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/061007 mailed May 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/061009 mailed May 30, 2013, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,649, mailed May 22, 2013, 7 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484, mailed Jun. 14, 2013, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/064255, mailed Jun. 20, 2013, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,840, mailed Jul. 1, 2013, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/218,400 mailed Nov. 8, 2012, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/316,229 mailed Nov. 14, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484 mailed Nov. 8, 2012, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US11/49243 mailed Nov. 13, 2012, 33 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/089,917 mailed Nov. 23, 2012, 6 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,453 mailed Dec. 6, 2012, 13 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/033037 mailed Oct. 23, 2012, 7 pages. |
Dixon, N., “Standardization boosts momentum for Envelope tracking,” Microwave Engineers, Europe, Apr. 20, 2011, 2 pages, http://www.mwee.com/en/standardisation-boosts-momentum-for-envelope-tracking.html?cmp—ids=71&news—ids=222901746. |
Knutson, P, et al., “An Optimal Approach to Digital Raster Mapper Design,” 1991 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics held Jun. 5-7, 1991, vol. 37, Issue 4, published Nov. 1991, pp. 746-752. |
Le, Hanh-Phuc et al., “A 32nm Fully Integrated Reconfigurable Switched-Capacitor DC-DC Convertor Delivering 0.55W/mmε2 at 81% Efficiency,” 2010 IEEE International Solid State Circuits Conference, Feb. 20-24, 2010, pp. 210-212. |
Sahu, B. et al., “Adaptive Power Management of Linear RF Power Amplifiers in Mobile Handsets—An Integrated System Design Approach,” submission for IEEE Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Mar. 2004, 4 pages. |
Unknown, “Nujira files 100th envelope tracking patent,” CS: Compound Semiconductor, Apr. 11, 2011, 1 page. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/112,006 mailed Apr. 5, 2010, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/112,006 mailed Jul. 19, 2010, 6 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US11/033037 mailed Aug. 9, 2011, 10 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/044857 mailed Oct. 24, 2011, 10 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US11/49243 mailed Dec. 22, 2011, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now Patent No. 7,773,691 mailed Feb. 1, 2008, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now Patent No. 7,773,691, mailed Jul. 30, 2008, 19 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now Patent No. 7,773,691, mailed Nov. 26, 2008, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873 now Patent No. 7,773,691, mailed May 4, 2009, 20 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now Patent No. 7,773,691, mailed Feb. 3, 2010, 21 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/113,873, now Patent No. 7,773,691, mailed Jun. 9, 2010, 7 pages. |
Kim, N. et al, “Ripple feedback filter suitable for analog/digital mixed-mode audio amplifier for improved efficiency and stability,” Power Electronics Specialists Conference, vol. 1, Jun. 23, 2002, pp. 45-49. |
International Search Report for PCT/US06/12619 mailed May 8, 2007, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/061009 mailed Feb. 8, 2012, 14 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Where Applicable Protest Fee for PCT/US2011/061007 mailed Feb. 13, 2012, 7 pages. |
Kim et al., “High Efficiency and Wideband Envelope Tracking Power Amplifiers with Sweet Spot Tracking,” 2010 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, May 23-25, 2010, pp. 255-258. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/064255 mailed Apr. 3, 2012, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for application 06740532.4 mailed Dec. 7, 2010, 7 pages. |
Choi, J. et al., “A New Power Management IC Architecture for Envelope Tracking Power Amplifier,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 59. No. 7, Jul. 2011, pp. 1796-1802. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/054106 mailed Feb. 9, 2012, 11 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US12/40317 mailed Sep. 7, 2012, 7 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/046887 mailed Dec. 21, 2012, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/188,024, mailed Feb. 5, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/062070, mailed Jan. 21, 2013, 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011/044857 mailed Mar. 7, 2013, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/218,400 mailed Apr. 11, 2013, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,470 mailed May 8, 2013, 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,453 mailed Feb. 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484 mailed Apr. 10, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/053654 mailed Feb. 15, 2013, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/067230 mailed Feb. 21, 2013, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/024124, mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/023495, mailed Aug. 15, 2013, 10 pages. |
Lie, Donald Y.C. et al., “Design of Highly-Efficient Wideband RF Polar Transmitters Using Envelope-Tracking (ET) for Mobile WiMAX/Wibro Applications,” IEEE 8th International Conference on ASIC (ASCION), Oct. 20-23, 2009, pp. 347-350. |
Lie, Donald Y.C. et al., “Highly Efficient and Linear Class E SiGe Power Amplifier Design,” 8th International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT), Oct. 23-26, 2006, pp. 1526-1529. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,484, mailed Aug. 26, 2013, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/222,453, mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,973, mailed Sep. 24, 2013, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 131602,856, mailed Sep. 24, 2013, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 131423,649, mailed Aug. 30, 2013, 8 pages. |
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 131531,719, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 131550,060, mailed Aug. 16, 2013, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 131316,229, mailed Aug. 29, 2013, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120195352 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61438755 | Feb 2011 | US |