Fast mixing condensation nucleus counter

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6567157
  • Patent Number
    6,567,157
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, October 12, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 20, 2003
    22 years ago
Abstract
A fast mixing condensation nucleus counter useful for detecting particles entrained in a sample gas stream is provided. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter comprises a detector and a mixing condensation device having a mixing chamber adapted to allow gas to flow from an inlet to an outlet, wherein the outlet directs the gas flow to the detector. The mixing chamber has an inlet for introducing vapor-laden gas into the chamber and at least one nozzle for introducing a sample gas having particles entrained therein into the chamber. The inlet and nozzle are arranged such that the vapor-laden gas and sample gas mix turbulently. The mixing chamber is configured such that the particles flow through the mixing chamber at a substantially uniform relative velocity.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a fast mixing condensation nucleus counter for use in determining the physical characteristics of aerosol particles.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Atmospheric particles influence climate change, radiative transfer, visibility, and air quality. Atmospheric aerosols include particles that are emitted directly to the atmosphere and those that are formed in the atmosphere by the reactions of gaseous pollutants and certain natural compounds. At high concentrations, they become the haze that reduces visibility a becomes a health hazard. Aerosols also play an important role in the global atmosphere. They scatter sunlight back to space, producing a cooling effect that partially offsets the warming induced by greenhouse gases such as CO


2


.




Aerosol measurements characterize the size, concentration and composition of particles suspended in the atmosphere. The ability to measure the concentration and size distribution of fine particles is essential to the understanding of the dynamics of aerosols in the atmosphere, in combustion systems, or in technological applications. The importance of characterizing fast transient aerosols has increased in recent years. For example, rapid transients in aerosol systems can arise due to dynamic response, such as in diesel engine particle emissions, or as a result of high speed traversing through different air masses, commonly a problem in airborne measurements. A continuing focus of aerosol research, then, is the development of measurement methods that have the time and size resolution necessary to resolve rapid aerosol dynamics in the atmosphere and in technological systems.




Detection and analysis of aerosols using a condensation nucleus counter (CNC) is well known. The CNC is also used as the primary detector for obtaining particle size distributions, for example in scanning electrical mobility spectrometers (SEMS), also known as scanning mobility particle sizers (SPMS). However, traditional CNC designs have slow detector response times, limiting the speed at which particle size distributions can be obtained, and thus rendering them impractical for obtaining time sensitive particle size distributions.




The condensation nucleus counter detects particles by condensing a vapor on the particles to grow them to large enough size that they can be counted optically. This measurement involves four steps: i) the production of sufficient quantities of vapor; ii) creation of the supersaturation necessary to activate the particles; iii) maintenance of the particles in the supersaturated state long enough to grow to detectable size; and iv) detection of the grown particles. The time required for a CNC to respond to changes in the aerosol concentration is constrained by the sum of the relevant times.




Another problem with these traditional CNCs is that stable flow recirculations are created in these systems. Stable flow recirculations operate to randomly trap some of the sample particles within the CNC. Thus, while some particles immediately exit the mixing region and enter the detector, other particles continue to recirculate inside the CNC and randomly exit at some later time, introducing an exponentially decaying distribution of delays between the time a particle enters the CNC and when it is detected. This was not a problem for early uses of CNCs, but has important consequences when such detectors are used for time sensitive measurements. In particular, the distribution of delay times smears scanning DMA size distribution measurements so the full potential of SEMS systems has not yet been realized. These stable flow recirculations create mixing and detection delays of up to 1 s, making scans shorter than 3 s impractical in these CNC systems.




In these traditional CNC designs, the aerosol sample is first passed through a saturation chamber wherein a sufficient quantity of vapor-laden gas is produced, and then to a condensation chamber for supersaturation and growth. In later designs, the sample aerosol bypasses the saturation chamber and is fed directly into the condensor where it mixes, under laminar flow conditions, with a pre-saturated flow of gas from the saturation chamber. This simple plumbing change eliminates the time delay associated with vapor production step above, and increases the detection speed of the CNC dramatically. For example, in a CNC using the original design, such as the TSI Model 3010, a typical particle size distribution scan (with data inversion to correct for smearing of the data) can be taken in 30 to 45 s. Meanwhile, scans up to 10 times faster can be obtained with ultrafine CNC (UCNC) devices, such as the TSI Model 3025, utilizing the saturation chamber bypass design.




While scanning times are faster in these UCNC systems, such UCNC devices generally have a very small aerosol flow rates, up to 33 times smaller than the standard CNCs, reducing the count rate obtainable with these detectors and making such devices practical only for aerosols with extremely high number concentrations or long sample times. This is particularly true at the low end of the particle size distribution where the charging efficiency of the spectrometer is low. As a result of the low signal strength of such devices, particles in a single mobility channel must be scanned for a longer time, either by reducing the scan rate, or by summing the counts acquired during a number of scans. While either of these solutions will increase count rates, both of these solutions also increase the length of time needed to obtain a scan, rendering the device less than ideal for obtaining particle size distributions where small fast transients are involved.




An alternative design for continuous-flow CNCs is the mixing CNC (MCNC). In this instrument a cold aerosol flow is mixed with a comparable flow of hot, vapor-laden gas. The mixed gas then passes from the mixing chamber into a chamber that provides sufficient residence time for the supersaturated particles to grow to optically detectable sizes. In these MCNC systems, rapid, nearly adiabatic mixing is facilitated by making the mixing region turbulent. Turbulent mixing can achieve compositional homogeneity quickly and without the use of a cooler. However, until now, large mixing chamber volumes have been employed to prevent thermophoretic deposition of the aerosol particles in the mixing chamber. The large mixing chamber volumes employed in these MCNC systems also create stable recirculation zones within the mixing chamber, resulting in long residence times for the aerosol in the mixing chamber rendering these MCNCs too slow for use as a DMA detector.




Accordingly, a need exists for a system that provides a fast response CNC which would allow accelerated SEMS measurements by reducing the residence time of aerosol particles in the system while maintaining high sample flow rates that enable high count rates by the detector.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a fast mixing condensation nucleus counter (FMCNC), for use in obtaining particle size distributions of fast transient aerosol systems over a wide range of particle sizes. This invention utilizes the turbulent mixing technology of the MCNC systems to provide fast particle growth and high sample flow rate and signal strength, but restricts the size of the mixing chamber to minimize the detector delay associated with traditional MCNC systems. This invention is also directed to novel methods for obtaining particle size distributions of fast transient aerosol systems over a wide range of particle sizes using the FMCNC of the invention.




In one embodiment, the invention is directed to a fast mixing condensation nucleus counter comprising a detector and a mixing condensation device having a mixing chamber adapted to allow gas to flow within it along a preselected path to an outlet, wherein the outlet directs the gas flow to the detector. The mixing chamber has an inlet for introducing vapor-laden gas into the chamber and at least one nozzle for introducing a sample gas having particles entrained therein into the chamber. The inlet and nozzle are arranged such that the vapor-laden gas and sample gas mix turbulently. The mixing chamber is configured such that the particles are distributed throughout the mixing chamber and move through the mixing chamber at a substantially uniform relative velocity. In an alternative statement of the invention, the mixing chamber is configured such that adjacent particles within the mixed gas flow move through mixing condensation chamber substantially together.




The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter also comprises a growth tube positioned between the outlet of the mixing chamber and the detector, wherein the growth tube is adapted to allow the mixture of vapor-laden gas and sample gas to flow along a preselected path to the detector such that the mixture is given sufficient time to allow the vapor-laden gas to condense on the particles entrained in the sample gas and grow the particles large enough for optical detection by the detector.




In a preferred embodiment, the mixing chamber comprises two nozzles positioned opposite one another (antipodal) and transverse to the vapor-laden gas inlet. In this embodiment a gas distribution manifold evenly divides the sample gas flow between the two nozzles.




In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a fast mixing condensation nucleus counter where the counter comprises a mixing chamber as described above, a gas distribution manifold and a saturation chamber. The gas manifold is positioned between the source of sample gas and the saturation chamber, and the saturation chamber is positioned between the gas manifold and the mixing chamber. The gas manifold is adapted to evenly divide the sample gas flow into two gas flows and direct one flow into the saturation chamber and one flow directly into the nozzle of the mixing chamber. The gas flowing into the saturation chamber interacts with a vaporized working gas to produce a vapor-laden gas which is then directed into the inlet of the mixing chamber. In a preferred embodiment, the saturation chamber comprises a packed bed reservoir of vaporized working gas. In another preferred embodiment, the saturation chamber also comprises a temperature control apparatus, where the temperature control apparatus maintains the temperature of the vapor-laden gas at a first temperature and where the sample gas has a second temperature, and wherein the first temperature is greater than the second temperature such that when the vapor-laden gas and the sample gas mix in the mixing chamber, the hot vapor-laden gas condenses on the cold particles of the sample gas before reaching the detector. In another preferred embodiment the temperature of the vapor-laden gas is maintained at between 60 and 90° C. and the temperature of the sample gas is maintained at room temperature.




In yet another preferred embodiment, the saturation chamber further comprises a filter positioned at the inlet to the saturation chamber such that the sample gas entering the saturation chamber is filtered to remove any particles entrained therein.




In yet another preferred embodiment, the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter further comprises a second gas manifold positioned between the filter and the saturation chamber. The gas manifold is adapted to divide the gas flowing through the filter into two gas flows, where one gas flow is directed to the saturation chamber and the other gas flow is directed through a bypass, and wherein the outlet of the saturation chamber and bypass are configured such that the flows mix prior to entering the inlet of the mixing chamber. In this embodiment of the invention, the division of the sample gas flow can be variably controlled such that by changing the ratio of gas flowing into the saturation chamber, the ratio of the vapor in the vapor-laden gas entering the mixing chamber can be adjusted.




In still another embodiment, the invention is directed to a fast mixing condensation nucleus counter wherein the sample gas source comprises calibration source comprising a nebulizer for producing a constant ultrafine sample gas flow rate and a tube furnace in fluid communication with the outlet of the nebulizer, wherein the tube furnace heats the sample gas to a constant furnace temperature. The tube furnace also having a furnace quencher wherein the quencher provides a source of filtered air such that the filtered air is injected into the outlet of the tube furnace at a specified injection rate to cool the heated gas. The sample gas source also comprising a differential mobility analyzer (DMA) classifier for sorting particles based on their size to produce a monodisperse ultrafine sample gas of specified particle size. In a preferred embodiment, the DMA classifier is either a cylindrical or radial DMA classifier. In another preferred embodiment, the sample gas source also comprises a charger disposed between the sample inlet and the inlet of the classifier. In yet another preferred embodiment, the charger employs a radioactive source, such as, a


210


Po.




In still yet another embodiment, the invention is directed to a method for detecting the particle size distribution of particles entrained in a sample gas. The method comprises analyzing a sample gas using a fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as described above. In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a method for detecting the particle size distribution of particles entrained in a sample gas using the FMCNC described above in a fast scan mode.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of an embodiment of the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter according to the invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic view of an embodiment of the mixing chamber according to the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the mixing chamber according to the invention.





FIG. 4

is a schematic view of an alternative embodiment of the mixing chamber according to the invention.





FIG. 5

is a cross-sectional view of the embodiment of the mixing chamber of the present invention as shown in FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a schematic view of an alternative embodiment of the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter according to the invention.





FIG. 7

is a schematic view of another alternative embodiment of the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter according to the invention.





FIG. 8

is a schematic view of yet another alternative embodiment of the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter according to the invention.





FIG. 9

is a graphical analysis of the effect increased temperature has on the scanning parameters of the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter according to the invention.





FIG. 10

is a graphical comparison of the scanning parameters of the prior art and the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is directed to a condensation nucleus counter designed to ensure rapid, homogenous, and adiabatic mixing of a gas sample with a vapor-laden gas, the condensation nucleus counter of the present invention herein called a fast mixing condensation nucleus counter (FMCNC). The FMCNC of the present invention being designed to detect particles entrained in a sample gas stream. In one embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 1

, the FMCNC


10


of the invention comprises a mixing chamber


12


, in fluid communication with a sample gas source


14


, a vapor-laden gas source


16


, and a detector


18


. Gas flows


20


are introduced into the mixing chamber


12


from the sample gas source


14


and the vapor-laden gas source


16


such that they turbulently mix in the mixing chamber


12


. The combined gas flow


21


then passes through the mixing chamber


12


and into the detector


18


, where the combined gas flow


21


is analyzed and the results output to a suitable monitor


22


. Any device having the ability to detect particles entrained within the combined gas flow


21


can be used as a detector


18


and monitor


22


, for example, an optical particle detector in signal communication with a computer.




The mixing chamber


12


, as shown in detail in

FIG. 2.

, defines an inner cavity


24


, having an inlet


26


in fluid communication with the vapor-laden gas source


16


, a set of nozzles


28


in fluid communication with the sample gas source


14


, and an outlet


30


in fluid communication with the detector


18


. The nozzles


28


and the inlet


26


are constructed such that the vapor-laden gas flow


32


and the sample gas flow


34


turbulently interact to create a mixture within the mixing chamber


12


. In the embodiment shown, the nozzles


28


are aligned antipodal to each other and transverse to the inlet


26


, however, any other configuration which produces turbulent interaction of the vapor-laden gas flow


32


and the sample gas flow


34


could also be used. For example, the two nozzles


28


and the inlet


26


could be aligned in opposing tangential trajectories, such that the sample gas flow


34


circulates in one of either a clockwise or counter clockwise direction within the mixing chamber


12


and the vapor-laden gas flow


32


circulates in the opposite direction, creating turbulent mixing of the two flows. Additionally, while the pictured embodiment comprises two nozzles


28


, any suitable combination and construction of at least one nozzle or multiple nozzles


28


can be used, so long as the nozzle(s)


28


are constructed so that turbulent mixing of the vapor-laden gas flow


32


and the sample gas flow


34


occurs.




Mixing of the vapor-laden gas flow


32


and the sample gas flow


34


is enhanced by turbulently mixing. Turbulence also helps offset the difficulty expected in trying to create supersaturation in a gas stream via conductive-cooling for a working fluid with a high molecular diffusivity such as water. Supersaturation in a laminar-flow conductive-cooling scheme is limited by the relative molecular and thermal diffusivities of the sample gas flow


34


and the vapor-laden gas flow


32


for which supersaturation is being generated. Turbulent flow makes the achieved supersaturation more dependent on the turbulent flow structure itself, rather than on the molecular and thermal diffusivities. Turbulent flow is created by aligning and sizing the inlet


26


and nozzles


28


through which the vapor-laden flow


32


and sample gas flow


34


respectively enter the inner cavity


24


, such that the diameter of the inlet


26


and nozzles


28


result in a turbulent Reynolds number for the flows


32


and


34


as it enters mixing chamber


12


. Generally, Reynolds numbers of less than 2200 are laminar for cylindrical pipe flow. For impinging nozzles gas flows such as


32


and


34


, non-laminar flow likely occurs at even lower Reynolds numbers. As the gas mixture moves from the inlet


26


and nozzles


28


of the mixing chamber


12


to and through the outlet


30


, the entrained particles act as nucleation sites for condensation due to the state of supersaturation within mixing chamber


12


. The grown particles


35


then pass through outlet


30


and into particle detector


18


.




The nozzles


28


and inlet


26


are both made of a material that is generally rigid, such as, for example, stainless steel. If desired to prevent thermal coupling of the vapor-laden gas flow


32


and the sample gas flow


34


, the inlet


26


and the nozzles


28


can be coupled to the mixing condensation chamber through individual insulating tubings


36


. The insulating tubings


36


thermally separate the “hot side” (vapor-laden gas source


16


) of the FMCNC


10


from the “cold side” (sample gas source


14


) of the FMCNC


10


. The insulating tubings


36


effectively isolate the vapor-laden gas inlet


26


and the nozzles


28


from the inner cavity


24


. Although a material such as Ultem is preferably used for the insulating tubings


36


due to its high-temperature properties, the insulating tubings


36


can be made of any material that is generally thermal insulating. Preferably the vapor-laden gas inlet


26


has an internal diameter ranging from 0.25 to 1.0 cm, more preferably of about 0.48 cm, even more preferably, the inlet


26


has an inner diameter about the same as the cross-section of the inner cavity


24


. Preferably the nozzles


28


have an internal diameter ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 mm, more preferably ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 mm, still more preferably of about 0.7 mm. It will be understood though that the internal diameter can be any size such that the nozzle provides turbulent mixing characteristics without impaction of the gas particles.




To connect the sample gas source


14


to each of the nozzles


28


, the FMCNC


10


also has a sample gas distribution manifold


37


adapted to allow gas to flow between the sample gas source


14


and the nozzles


28


. The sample gas distribution manifold


37


is constructed to evenly divide the sample gas flow


34


into a plurality of flows, with each of the flows being directed to enter one of the nozzles


28


. The sample gas distribution manifold


37


can be constructed in any suitable manner that would allow the sample gas flow


34


to reach the plurality of nozzles


28


of the mixing chamber


12


.




The mixing chamber


12


is also made of a material that is generally rigid, such as, for example, stainless steel. The mixing chamber


12


is constructed such that the mixture created by the turbulently mixing gas flows


32


and


34


flow through the mixing chamber


12


from the inlet


26


and nozzles


28


to the outlet


30


. The inner cavity


24


of the mixing chamber


12


is configured such that the particles entrained in the sample gas flow


34


move from the nozzles


28


to the outlet


30


at a substantially uniform relative velocity or such that adjacent particles move through the mixing chamber substantially together.




Any suitable design of the mixing chamber


12


may be used so long as the volume of the inner cavity


24


is restricted sufficiently to substantially eliminate those stable recirculation currents or dead zones that would cause the gas flows


32


and


34


to reside within the mixing chamber between the inlet


26


and nozzles


28


and the outlet


30


for longer than a small fraction of the total residence time in the FMCNC


10


between the mixing chamber


12


and the detector


18


. Preferably the inner cavity


24


has a volume less than about 1.00 cm


3


, more preferably less than about 0.85 cm


3


.





FIGS. 3

to


5


show two possible embodiments of the mixing chamber


12


of the present invention.

FIG. 3

, illustrates a detailed view of a simple four-way cross embodiment of the mixing chamber


12


of the present invention. In this implementation, the mixing chamber


12


is constructed from a 0.25 inch tubular cross-shaped fitting manufactured by Swagelok. The sample gas flow


34


is divided into two flows, as described above, and introduced through nozzles


28


aligned antipodal to each other. The vapor-laden gas flow


32


is introduced into the mixing chamber


12


through the inlet


26


aligned transverse to the nozzles


28


and antipodal to the outlet


30


. The inlet


26


has an internal diameter of 0.48 cm and the nozzles


28


have an internal diameter of 0.7 mm to ensure efficient turbulent mixing of the sample gas flow


34


with the vapor-laden gas flow


32


. The nozzles


28


are thermally isolated from the rest of the mixing chamber


12


by the addition of the insulating tubings


36


, which couple the nozzles to the mixing chamber


36


. The total volume of the mixing chamber


12


is about 0.85 cm


3


.





FIGS. 4 and 5

show another specific embodiment of the mixing chamber


12


of the present invention. As shown in

FIG. 4

, in this implementation, the mixing chamber


12


is constructed from first


100


and second


200


interlocking blocks. Block


100


comprises a generally solid metallic cube having a hollow cylindrical conduit


102


milled into its center point. Block


100


further has an inlet


104


, which serves as an entrance to another hollow cylindrical passage


106


extending from the inlet


104


at the outer edge of the block


100


, to an outlet


108


in fluid communication with the hollow cylinder


102


at the center of the block


100


. The second block


200


comprises a generally solid cubic base


202


and a generally solid cylinder


204


extending perpendicularly out of the surface of the cubic base


202


. The solid cylinder


204


comprises an inner hollow cylinder


206


having an inlet


208


and an outlet


210


. The inner hollow cylinder


206


extends coaxially through the center of the solid cylinder


204


from the inlet


208


, at the center point of the solid cubic base


202


, to the outlet


210


. A hollow channel


212


extends 180° around the circumference of the solid cylinder


204


and terminates at either end in nozzle conduits


214


. The nozzle conduits


214


extend radially into the solid cylinder


204


. The nozzle conduits


214


have nozzle outlets


216


aligned antipodal to each other that open into the inner hollow cylinder


206


. The two blocks


100


and


200


interlock such that the generally solid cylinder


204


of block


200


extends into the hollow cylinder


102


of block


100


. The solid cylinder


204


and the hollow cylinder


102


fit, such that an airtight seal is formed between the solid cylinder


204


and the hollow cylinder


102


, and such that the outlet


108


of the conduit


106


is in fluid communication with the hollow channel


212


. The airtight seal between blocks


100


and


200


may be improved by interposing an o-ring seal between the interacting faces of the blocks.





FIG. 5

shows a cross section of the fluid passage thus formed by the interlocked blocks


100


and


200


. The inlet


104


is in fluid communication with the conduit


106


which in turn is in fluid communication with hollow channel


212


through outlet


108


. Hollow channel


212


is in turn in fluid communication with nozzle conduits


214


which are in fluid communication with inner hollow cylinder


206


through nozzle outlets


216


. In this embodiment, the sample gas flow


34


enters the device through inlet


104


, flows through conduit


106


, and is divided into two flows at outlet


108


. One of the sample gas flows


34


travels clockwise around hollow channel


212


and the other sample gas flow travels counterclockwise around hollow channel


212


. The sample gas flows


34


are then introduced through nozzle conduits


214


out of nozzle outlets


216


and enter the hollow inner cylinder


206


which serves as the mixing chamber


12


. The vapor-laden gas flow


32


is introduced into the inner hollow cylinder


206


or mixing chamber


12


through the inlet


208


in the cubic base


202


of block


200


, as shown in FIG.


4


. The inlet


208


is aligned transverse to the nozzle outlets


216


and antipodal to the outlet


210


. The sample gas flow


34


and the vapor-laden gas flow


32


mix in the inner hollow cylinder


206


and pass through the outlet


210


to the detector


18


beyond. The inlet


208


has an internal diameter of 0.45 cm and the nozzles


216


have an internal diameter of 0.057 cm to ensure efficient turbulent mixing of the sample gas flow


34


with the vapor-laden gas flow


32


. The total volume of the mixing chamber


12


is about 0.087 cm


3


. As described above, the nozzle outlets


216


can be thermally isolated from the rest of the inner hollow cylinder


206


if desired by the addition of the insulating tubings (not shown), which would couple the nozzle conduits


214


to the inner hollow cylinder


206


.




Several alternative embodiments of the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter


10


of the present invention are shown in

FIGS. 6

to


8


. The vapor-laden gas source


14


as shown in

FIG. 6

comprises a saturation chamber


38


having an inlet


40


and an outlet


42


. The saturation chamber inlet


40


is in fluid communication with a saturation filter


44


such that an untreated gas flow


46


runs through the saturation filter


44


, enters the saturation chamber


38


, interacts with a vaporized working fluid


48


held therein, and exits the saturation chamber outlet


42


as a vapor-laden gas flow


32


.




In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 6

, an untreated gas distribution manifold


47


is positioned at the entrance to the saturation filter


44


. The untreated gas distribution manifold


47


is constructed to evenly divide the untreated gas flow


46


into a plurality of flows, with one of the flows being directed to enter the saturation filter


44


and from there the saturation chamber


38


, and one of the flows being directed to bypass the saturation chamber and enter the mixing chamber


12


directly through the nozzles


28


. The untreated gas distribution manifold


47


can be constructed in any suitable manner that would allow the sample gas to be distributed between the saturation chamber


38


and the nozzles


28


.




In the embodiment described herein, butanol is used as the working fluid


48


; however, any suitable working fluid may be used provided the working fluid can be vaporized in the saturation chamber


38


and condensed onto the particles entrained within the sample gas flow


34


prior to reaching the detector


18


. For example, common working fluids include: dibutylphthalate (DBP), dioctylsebacate (DOS), Multifluor APF-175 (Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Allentown, Pa.), or water. However, those skilled in the art of CNCs will recognize that many fluids could be suitable for use as the working fluid


48


, so long as it is chemically inert (would not react or decompose when heated) and the vapor pressure at different temperatures is well known. The saturation chamber outlet


42


is in fluid communication with the mixing chamber


12


such that the vapor-laden gas flow


32


exits the saturation chamber and then enters the mixing chamber


12


.




The saturation chamber


38


is in thermal communication with a temperature controller


50


which heats the saturation chamber


38


and the vapor-laden gas flow


32


therein to a specified vapor-laden gas temperature T


1


. Any first temperature T


1


sufficient to cause saturation of the untreated gas stream


46


may be used. The actual appropriate range for the vapor-laden gas temperature T


1


depends upon the working fluid


48


used in the FMCNC


10


. Preferably, a first temperature is chosen which aides the saturation process within saturation chamber


38


and later the condensation process within the mixing condensation chamber


12


. The saturation chamber temperature must exceed a minimum value to produce supersaturation according to the equation:






Δχ


ν





ν


−χ


sat








where χ


ν


is the actual vapor mole fraction in the mixing chamber


12


at a particular time, χ


ν,sat


is the vapor mole fraction needed to achieve saturation and Δχ


ν


is the excess vapor mole fraction. The present invention uses a temperature T


1


which yields a large excess vapor mole fraction, for example, when butanol is the working fluid the temperature T


1


can range from 40 to 90° C., more preferably from 65 to 85° C., still more preferably about 80° C. However, other saturation temperatures may be used depending on the working fluid utilized, for example, for water a temperature of 60 to 80° C., and for Dibutylphthalate (DBP) a temperature of 100-135° C. Temperatures outside this range could also be used within appropriate changes in flow rates, mixing conditions, or growth chamber temperature. There are a number of means by which one can heat the saturation chamber


38


. In one embodiment of the present invention, shown in

FIG. 6

, a cartridge-type electrical temperature controller


50


is inserted into the saturation chamber. FireRod electrical heaters manufactured by Watlow are an example of this type of heater.




Those skilled in the art of CNC's recognize that there are a number of methods one can use to saturate a gas stream. In one approach, the saturation chamber


38


may be lined or packed with a porous material


51


such as a polyvinyl alcohol sponge, or cotton in order to wick the vaporized working fluid


48


to the entire interior surface of the saturation chamber


38


thereby improving the efficiency of the saturation process. Additionally, a recirculation pump (not shown) could maintain the circulation of working fluid


48


through the saturation chamber


38


. In this way a constant volume of working fluid


48


is maintained within the saturation chamber


38


. In addition, in this system the working fluid


48


can be continuously cleaned by passing it through a separate recirculation filter (not shown). Another approach would simply be to use a static pool of working fluid. Essentially, this idea could be implemented using the above described saturation chamber


38


without the associated elements for recirculating the working fluid


48


.




The saturation filter


44


can be made of any suitable material, preferably a sintered metal filter such as used for high-purity gas lines as an all metal construction lends itself to being maintained at a known and controlled temperature. Examples of suitable filters are the Gas Shield Penta Filter manufactured by Mott Corporation or the Ultipor filter by Pall. Those skilled in the art will recognize that other types of filters, such as, HEPA filters would work as well in the FMCNC


10


. The saturation filter


44


may be incorporated into the same structure as saturation chamber


38


or may be separate. Although

FIG. 6

depicts a preferred embodiment of the present invention wherein the saturation filter


44


is mounted at the saturation chamber inlet


40


, the filter could also be positioned at the outlet of the saturation chamber


42


. In a preferred embodiment, the saturation filter


44


is positioned at the saturation chamber inlet


40


and is contained within the same housing as the saturation chamber


38


, as shown in FIG.


6


. In one embodiment the saturation filter


44


is in thermal communication with a second temperature controller


52


and is heated to a temperature T


2


such that the vaporized working fluid


48


in the vapor-laden gas flow


32


does not condense in the saturation filter


44


. Preferably T


2


is no less, and is preferably 5 to 15° C. greater than, temperature T


1


.




The vapor-laden gas flow


32


exits the saturation chamber outlet


42


and enters the mixing chamber inlet


26


. The particles to be measured are carried in a sample gas flow


34


which enters mixing chamber


12


through the sample gas nozzles


28


. To encourage condensation the sample gas flow


34


is held at a lower temperature T


3


than the vapor-laden gas flow


32


. Preferably T


3


is about room temperature, although the sample gas source


14


could also comprise a cooler (not shown) to chill the sample gas flow


34


below room temperature. The two gas flows,


32


and


34


are mixed in mixing chamber


12


to produce a mixed gas flow


54


wherein the mixed gas is supersaturated with respect to the working fluid. In general, the mixing of the vapor-laden gas flow


32


at a relatively high temperature T


1


and the sample gas flow


34


at a relatively low temperature T


3


results in the supersaturation of the mixed gas flow


54


.




Referring specifically to

FIG. 6

, in one embodiment the FMCNC


10


includes a growth tube


56


adapted to allow gas to flow therethrough and having an inlet


58


and an outlet


60


. The growth tube inlet


58


is in fluid communication with the mixing chamber outlet


30


such that the mixed gas flow


54


exits the mixing chamber


12


through the mixing chamber outlet


30


and enters the growth tube


56


through the growth tube inlet


58


. As the mixed gas flow


54


moves through the growth tube


56


, particles entrained in the mixed gas flow


54


operate as nucleation sites for condensation of the vaporized working fluid


48


to grow the particles to a larger size. The growth tube


56


may have any length which provides suitable time for the vaporized working fluid


48


to condense on the particles. For example, in the embodiment shown in

FIG. 6

the growth tube


56


is about 7 cm long, however, other lengths can be used so long as the particle loss due to thermophoretic reactions with the walls of the growth tube


56


is minimized.




To encourage condensation and minimize growth tube length, the interior of the growth tube


56


can be cooled by a cooling device


62


. Cooling of the growth chamber may be achieved by using thermo-electric devices (TED). TED are electrical solid-state devices such as the model CPI.4-127-045L manufactured by Melcor. Other cooling means are also possible such as recirculating a refrigerant fluid, cooled to the desired temperature, around the growth tube


56


. To achieve a uniform temperature in growth tube


56


, it is preferably constructed from a high thermal conductivity material such as copper. Additionally, in this embodiment, an insulator


64


insulates the growth tube


56


from the room-temperature particle detector


18


. Any suitable insulating material, such as Delrin can be used to form the insulator


64


.




The grown particles are drawn from the growth tube outlet


60


and enter the particle detector


18


where well known techniques are used to detect the size and number of grown particles. In a preferred embodiment, shown in

FIG. 6

, the particle detector


18


is located proximal to growth tube


56


so as to avoid the condensation of vapor on the walls of the growth tube


56


and to minimize particle loss to walls before they are counted by particle detector


18


. The number of grown particles is detected within the particle detector


18


. Any suitable detection device could be used as a particle detector


18


, for example, light-scattering particle detectors are well-known to those skilled in the art of particle detectors. Suitable devices which could be used as light-scattering particle detectors include a modified version of Model LPSC-310 laser particle counter manufactured by Particle Measuring Systems, Inc. The standard Model LPSC-310 laser particle counter is calibrated for a 1.0 cfm sample flow rate. For use in FMCNC


10


, the laser particle counter is calibrated for a sample flow rate of about 0.65 l/min.




In one embodiment, the gas flow is drawn through the FMCNC


10


by a pump


66


. The pump


66


draws gas from a gas source


46


into the FMCNC


10


. The vapor-laden and sample gas flows are drawn through the FMCNC


10


, through the particle detector


18


to the vacuum pump


66


, and are exhausted through the exhaust


68


. The exhaust


68


may be connected to a process line (not shown) or may operate to exhaust the mixed gas stream


54


into the environment. The gas flow through the pump


66


is controlled by a flow control valve


70


, which opens and closes as appropriate to maintain the desired flow rate of gas through the pump


66


. Those skilled in the art of CNC's recognize that there are many other methods to achieve flow control. In one embodiment of the present invention, the saturated gas flow rate, through pump


66


is 1.0 l/min and the sample gas flow rate through is 0.65 l/min. Although a vacuum pump


66


is shown in this embodiment, any pressure or vacuum producing device that creates a pressure differential between the sample gas source supply


14


and the detector


18


can be used. Examples of suitable, commercially available vacuum pumps are the Gast Model 2032-V103 or the KNF Neuberger model MPU860 Diaphragm pump.




The FMCNC of

FIG. 7

comprises the elements discussed above, and additionally, a vapor-laden gas distribution manifold


72


disposed between the saturation filter


44


and the saturation chamber


38


, comprising a saturation chamber flow controller


74


, and a bypass flow controller


76


. The vapor-laden gas distribution manifold


72


is constructed so that gas passing through the saturation filter


44


is variably divided by the flow controllers


74


and


76


so that some portion of the gas enters the saturation chamber


38


, and some portion enters a bypass conduit


78


. The gas passing through the saturation chamber


38


interacts with the vaporized working fluid


48


as described above and emerges from the saturation chamber outlet


42


as a vapor-laden gas into a vapor-laden gas mixing chamber


80


. The gas passing through the bypass conduit also emerges into the vapor-laden gas mixing chamber


80


but is not vapor-laden. The vapor-laden gas and the bypass gas mix in the vapor-laden gas mixing chamber


80


and then enter the mixing chamber


12


through the mixing chamber inlet


26


as a flow of vapor-laden gas


32


. In the embodiment shown, the bypass conduit runs through the heated region of the saturation chamber


38


such that the bypass gas is maintained at the same temperature as the vapor-laden gas, however, the bypass conduit could also be designed with an independent temperature controller.




The vapor-laden gas distribution manifold


72


can be constructed by any suitable means such that by variably adjusting the relative flows of gas through the flow controllers


74


and


76


, the ratio of vapor-laden gas to sample gas in the mixing condensation chamber can be altered. The speed at which supersaturation is achieved and the critical size of the particles needed to condense out the vaporized working fluid


48


are critically dependent on the molar ratio of vapor to sample gas, by altering the ratio of vapor-laden gas to non-vapor-laden gas the critical particle size needed for condensation and the speed at which supersaturation and condensation can be achieved can be controlled. Further, because the ratio can be altered by adjusting the flow controllers


74


and


76


, the detectable particle size can be scanned and the speed of the scan can be adjusted far more efficiently than can be achieved by varying other parameters of the system, such as, temperature.




Another embodiment of the sample gas source


14


is shown in detail in FIG.


8


. In this embodiment the sample gas source


14


comprises a nebulizer


82


for producing a fine mist of any chosen sample gas. The nebulizer


82


is in fluid communication with a tube furnace


84


to dry the nebulized sample aerosol. The tube furnace


84


is adapted to allow the sample gas to flow therethrough. The tube furnace is in thermal contact with a furnace heater


85


which heats the furnace to temperatures needed to dry the nebulized sample aerosol. The temperature of the furnace will depend on the sample aerosol chosen, for example, for a nebulized mist of NaCl, a furnace temperature of about 700° C. is utilized. The gas exits the tube furnace


84


through an outlet


86


, which is intersected by at least one quenching jet


88


, providing a source of filtered air such that the quenching jet


88


injects filtered air into the outlet


86


of the tube furnace


84


at a specified injection rate to cool the heated gas. Any suitable injection rate can be used, in one preferred embodiment, filtered air is injected at a rate of 20 l/min. A neutralizer


90


, designed to neutralize the aerosol particles, is disposed between the tube furnace outlet


86


and a DMA classifier


92


. After passing through the neutralizer


90


, the DMA classifier


92


then sorts the particles based on their size to produce a monodisperse, ultrafine sample gas source


14


of specified particle size. Any suitable neutralizer


90


and DMA


92


can be used. In a preferred embodiment, the charger


90


is a


210


Po charger and the DMA classifier


92


is a radial DMA classifier. The monodisperse, ultrafine sample gas source


14


then enters the FMCNC


10


as described above.




Control of the various temperature controllers


50


and


52


, as well as control of flow controllers


70


,


74


and


76


is accomplished using well-known Proportional, Integral, Derivative (PID) controllers. For example, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a LabView PID controller from National Instruments is used to control each of the temperatures in FMCNC


10


. As is known to those skilled in the art of PID controllers, the user sets a setpoint for each control variable and the PID controller outputs a control signal that controls the operation of the selected device as appropriate to maintain the setpoint. Those skilled in the art of CNCs will recognize there are other control methods which may also be used.




A prototype of the FMCNC


10


described above was constructed according to the design detailed in

FIG. 6

utilizing a mixing chamber


12


as described and shown in

FIG. 3

above. Table 1 and

FIGS. 9 and 10

show the results of tests comparing the scanning speed and efficiency of this embodiment of the FMCNC of the present invention with that of the prior art CNCs. In the test FMCNC, an initial flow of sample gas is split and a fraction of the flow is passed through a HEPA filter, to remove all particles, and then through a packed bed saturation chamber of cotton saturated with n-butanol. The saturation chamber was maintained at a pre-determined temperature between 40 and 80° C. using a PID. The sample gas bypassing the saturation chamber was held at room temperature.




The sample gas entered through two nozzles aligned antipodal to each other and having an internal diameter of 0.7 mm. Polymeric tubes coupled the nozzles to the mixing chamber to minimize thermal coupling prior to mixing. The vapor-laden gas emerged through an inlet aligned transverse to the nozzles. The flows were then turbulently mixed in a small mixing chamber having a total volume of about 0.85 cm


3


. The mixed gas exited the mixing chamber and flowed down a ¼ inch copper growth tube having an internal diameter of 0.48 cm and a length of 7 cm to the detector. The flow rate to the detector was maintained at 1.0 l/min, a LabView PID controller controlled the flow rate with an accuracy of 0.2%.




Typically, CNCs have operated at a temperature where the vapor mole fraction is just slightly above that which is needed to achieve supersaturation. It was thought that increasing the temperature further would cause delays in condensation times and unwanted reactions with the walls of the mixing chamber. As shown in

FIG. 9

, the present invention uses a higher saturation chamber temperature than is typically used, which yields a large excess vapor mole fraction Δχ


ν


and saturation ratio S, and which, surprisingly, also allows for condensation of the working fluid on particles of smaller initial size. In turn, these improved operational conditions yield faster supersaturation and condensation times.




The mixing times of the FMCNC of the present invention and the two prior art CNCs, manufactured by TSI, were measured using a pulse of ultra-fine particles created by a single discharge in a spark-source aerosol generator. Additionally, the FMCNC counting efficiency for ultrafine aerosol particles was measured. Particles ranging from 5 nm to 150 nm were measured. These results were compared with published values for the counting efficiency of the commercially available TSI 3010 CNC and TSI 3025 UCNC. The aerosol flow (Qa), total gas flow (Q


total


), the total delay time (τ


delay


), the mixing delay time (τ


mixing


), and the critical particle size, or the particle size at which the counting efficiency is 50% for all three machines is reported.




The results of this experiment are shown in Table 1, below.












TABLE 1











Flows, Delay Times, Minimum Detectable Particle Size Comparison






for FMCNC, TSI 3010 CNC and TSI 3025 UCNC

















Q










CNC




Aerosol




Q total






D


p,50%








Type




(l/min)




(l/min)




τ delay (s)




τ mixing (s)




(nm)



















FMCNC




0.65




1




0.38 ± 0.013




0.058 ± 0.002




5






TSI 3025




0.03




1.5




1.03 ± 0.02




0.174 ± 0.005




3






(high flow)






TSI 3025




0.03




0.3




1.7




1




3






(low flow)






TSI 3010




1




1









1.35 ± 0.05




3.5






(enhanced)






TSI 3010




1




1




1.2




0.9




10














As Table 1 shows, the total delay time for the FMCNC is only 0.38 s, compared to a 1.03 s delay time for the fastest prior art device, the TSI 3025 UCNC. It was previously thought that small mixing chamber volumes would result in increased particle losses because of thermophoretic deposition of the netrained particles to the walls of the mixing chamber. As shown in Table 1 and

FIG. 10

, and discussed in more detail below, surprisingly, the opposite has been found to be true, as the smaller mixing chamber volumes described herein have reduced overall residence time of the particles within the mixing chamber and thus allowed shorter overall scan times.




The minimum detectable particle size is not significantly different between the three instruments, 5 nm for the FMCNC and 3 nm for the TSI 3025 UCNC. It should be noted that these measurements were taken without a fully optimized FMCNC, thus the minimum detectable particle size is expected to be improved in the most recent embodiment of the invention. Further, it is well-known to those skilled in the art of CNCs that the CNC's detectable range can be extended to sub-nanometer sizes by carefully controlling the temperatures of the saturated vapor and aerosol flows to ensure adiabatic operation.




It is noteworthy, however, that the aerosol flow rate for the FMCNC of the present invention is 17 times that of the fastest response laminar flow CNCs. This aerosol rate translates into larger count rates at a given DMA scan or, conversely, into equal numbers of particles counted in each channel for much shorter scans.





FIG. 10

shows a comparison of the reliability of fast particle distribution scans made using the FMCNC of the present invention and the prior art CNCs. The expected number of particles counted during scanning DMA measurements is the product of the volumetric flow rate of aerosol that is counted, the number concentration of particles in the transmitted particle size interval, and the probability that particles in that interval will be charged and transmitted through the DMA to the CNC. Thus, the uncertainties in the measurements are accentuated in fast scans due to unavoidable degradation of the counting statistics.

FIG. 10

examines the performance of the FMCNC at typical urban and remote continental (background or ambient) aerosol concentrations. As shown, under either condition the uncertainty in a 1 s scan using the FMCNC exceeds that of a 1 min scan using either the TSI 3025 or TSI 3010. However, a 5 s average of 1 s scans using the FMCNC outperforms the TSI 3025, and a 1 min average of 1 s scans matches the TSI 3010.




The advantage from such fast scans is that DMA size distributions are measured by scanning or stepping through a range of particle sizes. Each particle size is thus measured at a different time. Fast scans reduce the time lag between measurements of different particle sizes. In measurements made aboard moving platforms, e.g. road-side or tunnel measurements of vehicle emissions, this time-averaging eliminates biases and misinterpretation that occur when the instrument transits from one air mass to another.




The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments of the invention. Workers skilled in the art and technology to which this invention pertains will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structure may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principal, spirit and scope of this invention.




Accordingly, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read consistent with and as support to the following claims which are to have their fullest and fair scope.



Claims
  • 1. A fast mixing condensation nucleus counter for detecting particles entrained in a sample gas stream, said counter comprising:a mixing condensation device having: a mixing chamber; an inlet for introducing a vapor-laden gas flow to the chamber; an outlet for extracting the mixture from the chamber at least one nozzle for introducing a sample gas flow to the chamber in mixing proximity to the vapor-laden gas flow such that the particles flow through the chamber from said at least one nozzle to the outlet; wherein the inlet and said at least one nozzle are arranged such that the vapor-laden gas flow and the sample gas flow interact to create a turbulent flow of a mixture thereof within the chamber at a Reynolds number of less than about 2200; and the mixing chamber defines a volume sufficiently small to ensure that the particles move from said at least one nozzle to said outlet at a substantially uniform relative velocity without forming recirculation currents; and a particle detector for receiving the mixture from the outlet and sensing a characteristic of said mixture.
  • 2. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein said counter further comprises a sample gas distribution manifold disposed at the entrance to said at least one nozzle, said manifold having a plurality of channels extending from said manifold, with said plurality of channels positioned with respect to said at least one nozzle to evenly divide said sample gas stream into a plurality of flows, with each of said flows entering said at least one nozzle.
  • 3. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 2 wherein the mixing condensation chamber comprises two nozzles.
  • 4. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 3 wherein the nozzles are aligned antipodal to each other.
  • 5. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 3 wherein the nozzles are aligned transverse to the vapor-laden gas inlet.
  • 6. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 3 wherein the inlet and the nozzle are aligned in opposing tangential directions.
  • 7. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the nozzles are coupled to the mixing condensation chamber through a polymeric tubing.
  • 8. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the mixing chamber has a cross section and wherein the inlet has a diameter substantially the same as the cross section of the inner cavity.
  • 9. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the vapor-laden gas inlet is coupled to the mixing condensation chamber through a polymeric tubing.
  • 10. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the inner cavity has a volume of from 0.25 and 1.00 cm3.
  • 11. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the inner cavity has a volume of about 0.85 cm3.
  • 12. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the particle detector is an optical particle detector.
  • 13. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the vapor-laden gas further has a vaporized working fluid entrained therein and a first temperature, and the sample gas has particles entrained therein and a second temperature, wherein said second temperature is less than said first temperature such that when said sample gas and said vapor-laden gas are mixed in the mixing condensation chamber, said vaporized working fluid condenses on said particles to produce enlarged particles.
  • 14. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the counter further comprises a differential pressure means for causing said vapor-laden gas and said sample gas to flow into said fast mixing condensation nucleus counter.
  • 15. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the counter further comprises a temperature control apparatus for maintaining the inner cavity of said mixing condensation chamber at a specified temperature such that the vapor-laden gas does not condense on the inner cavity.
  • 16. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the counter further comprises a growth tube disposed between said mixing condensation chamber and said particle detector, said growth tube being adapted to allow the mixture to pass therethrough and having a length sufficient to allow the vapor-laden gas to condense on the particles of the sample gas to produce enlarged particles having a particle size sufficient for detection by the particle detector.
  • 17. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 16 wherein the growth chamber further comprises a temperature control apparatus for maintaining the inside walls of said growth chamber at a specified temperature such that the mixture does not adhere to the growth tube.
  • 18. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the counter further comprises a saturation chamber having an inlet, an outlet, and a first heating apparatus, and containing a vaporized working fluid, said first heating apparatus maintaining said saturation chamber at a first temperature such that a gas flowing through said saturation chamber becomes saturated with said vaporized working fluid to form a vapor-laden gas.
  • 19. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 18 wherein the saturation chamber is a packed bed saturation chamber.
  • 20. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 18 wherein the counter further comprises a saturation filter in fluid communication with the inlet of the saturation chamber which removes particles from said gas.
  • 21. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 20 wherein said saturation filter comprises a second heating apparatus for maintaining said saturation filter at said first temperature.
  • 22. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 20 wherein the counter further comprises a gas distribution manifold, said manifold evenly dividing said sample gas stream into a plurality of flows so that one of said flows enters said saturation filter of said saturation chamber, and one of said flows enters a conduit in direct fluid communication with the mixing condensation chamber.
  • 23. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 22 wherein said counter further comprises a sample gas conditioner disposed within the conduit and adapted to allow said sample gas stream to flow therethrough said sample gas conditioner having a second temperature control apparatus for maintaining the temperature of said sample gas at the second temperature and a flow rate detector for measuring the flow rate of said sample gas.
  • 24. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 20 further comprises:a pre-saturation gas distribution manifold disposed between said saturation filter and said saturation chamber, said manifold variably dividing said sample gas stream into a plurality of flows so that one of said flows enters said inlet of said saturation chamber, and one of said flows enters a bypass conduit, said bypass conduit having a third heating apparatus which maintains the bypass conduit at the first temperature; and a saturation mixing chamber having at least one inlet and an outlet, said at least one inlet being in direct fluid communication with the outlet of the saturation chamber and the bypass conduit and said outlet being in direct fluid communication with the inlet of the mixing condensation chamber; wherein the ratio of vapor-laden gas to sample gas in the mixing condensation chamber by variably controlling the flow of gas into the saturation chamber.
  • 25. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1 wherein the sample gas is generated in a sample gas source comprising:a nebulizer having an inlet and an outlet, said nebulizer producing a constant ultrafine sample gas flow rate; a tube furnace having an inlet and an outlet, said furnace inlet in fluid communication with the outlet of the nebulizer, said outlet defining conduit having a center axis, said tube furnace having a furnace temperature controller that maintains the tube furnace at a constant furnace temperature; a furnace quencher having at least one quenching jet aligned radially around the center axis of the tube furnace outlet, said quenching jet provided with a source of filtered air such that the quenching jet can inject the filtered air into the outlet of the tube furnace at a specified injection rate; an ultrafine sample gas DMA classifier having an inlet and an outlet, said outlet in fluid communication with the saturation chamber, said classifier provided to produce a monodisperse ultrafine sample gas of specified particle size; a charger disposed between the outlet of the tube furnace and the inlet of the classifier.
  • 26. The fast mixing condensation nucleus counter as recited in claim 1, wherein the counter is a component of a scanning electrical mobility spectrometer.
  • 27. A fast mixing condensation nucleus counter for detecting particles entrained in a sample gas stream, said counter comprising:a mixing condensation device having: a mixing chamber; an inlet for introducing a vapor-laden gas flow to the chamber; an outlet for extracting the vapor-laden gas flow from the chamber; at least one nozzle for introducing a sample gas flow to the chamber in mixing proximity to the vapor-laden gas flow such that the particles flow through the chamber from said at least one nozzle to the outlet; wherein the mixing chamber has a cross section and wherein the inlet has a diameter substantially the same as the cross section of the inner cavity; and wherein the inlet and said at least one nozzle are arranged such that the vapor-laden gas flow and the sample gas flow interact such that the kinetic energies of the flows are dissipated within the mixing chamber to create a turbulent flow of a mixture thereof even at a Reynolds number of less than about 2200 such that adjacent particles within said gas flow move through said chamber substantially together and substantially without forming recirculation currents; and a particle detector for receiving the particles from the outlet and sensing a characteristic of said particles.
  • 28. A method of analyzing particles entrained within a sample gas comprising introducing a sample gas having particles entrained therein into the fast mixing condensation nucleus counter of claim 1.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is based on U.S. Application No. 60/159,125, filed Oct. 12, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention pursuant to grant N0014-96-1-0119 awarded by the U.S. Office of Naval Research.

US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
3806248 Sinclair Apr 1974 A
5596136 Flagan et al. Jan 1997 A
5606112 Flagan et al. Feb 1997 A
5675405 Schildmeyer et al. Oct 1997 A
5872622 Schildmeyer et al. Feb 1999 A
5903338 Mavliev et al. May 1999 A
5922976 Russell et al. Jul 1999 A
6003389 Flagan et al. Dec 1999 A
6051189 Wick et al. Apr 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0 242 564 Oct 1987 EP
WO 9902957 Jan 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
Agarwal, J.K. and Sem, G.J., “Continuous Flow, Single-particle Counting Condensation Nucleus Counter”, J. Areosol Sci., (1980), vol. 11, pp. 343-357.
Bartz, H., Fissan, H., and Liu B.Y.H., “A New Generator for Ultrafine Aerosols Below 10-NM”, Aerosol Sci. Technol., (1987), vol. 6, pp. 163-171.
Brink, H.M.T., Plomp, A., Spoelstra, H., and van de Vate, J.F., “A High-Resolution Electrical Mobility Aerosal Spectrometer (MAS)”, J. Aerosol Sci., (1983), vol. 14, pp. 589-597.
Fissan, H.J., Helsper, C., and Thielen, H.J., “Determination of Particle Size Distributions by Means of an Electrostatic Classifier”, J. Aerosol Sci., (1983), vol. 14, pp. S354-357.
Knutson, E.O. and Whitby, K.T., “Aerosol Classification by Electric Mobility: Apparatus, Theory and Applications”, J. Aerosol Sci., (1975), vol. 6, pp. 443-451.
Wang, S.C. and Flagan, R.C. “Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer”, J. Aerosol Sci., (1989), vol. 20, pp. 1485-1488.
Ahn, Kang-Ho, et al; Particle Activation and Droplet Growth Processes in Condensation Nucleus Counter—I. Theoretical Background; J. Aerosol Sci, 1990, pp. 249-261, vol. 21, No. 2, Pergamon Press: Great Britain.
Ahn, Kang-Ho, et al.; Particle Activation and Droplet Growth Processes in Condensation Nucleus Counter—II. Experimental Study, J. Aerosol Sci., 1990, pp. 263-275. vol. 21, No. 2, Pergamon Press: Great Britain.
Kesten, J. et al; Calibration of a TSI Model 3025 Ultrafine Condensation Particle Counter; Aerosol Science and Technology, 1991, pp. 107-111, vol. 15, Elsevier Science.
Kousaka, Yasuo, et al; Activation of Ultrafine Particles by Supersaturation in Condensational Process; Part. Charact. 2; Apr. 1985, pp. 119 123.
Kousaka, Y. et al; Development of a Mixing Type Condensation Nucleus Counter; 1982; pp. 231-240; vol. 13, No. 3, Pergamon Press Ltd.: Great Britain.
Kousaka, Yasuo; Evaluation of High Flow Rate Mixing Type CNC; 1991; pp. 359-364; vol. 46, No. 4.
Liu, B.Y.H., et al; Intercomparison of Different “Absolute” Instruments for Measurement of Aerosol Number Concentration; J. Aerosol Sci.; 1982; pp. 429-450; vol. 13, No. 5; Pergamon Press: Great Britain.
Richardson, R.J., et al; Developments in 30 Angstrom Particle Detection for Ultraclean Gas System; J. Aerosol Sci.; 1990; pp. S575-S578; vol. 21, Suppl. 1; Pergamon Press: Great Britain.
Russell, Lynn M. et al; Asymmetric Instrument Response Resulting from Mixing Effects in Accelerated DMA-CPC Measurements; Aerosol Science and Technology; 1995; pp. 491-509; vol. 23; Elsevier, Inc.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/159125 Oct 1999 US