The present embodiments generally relate to content addressable memory (CAM) devices, and more particularly to quaternary CAM cells.
Content addressable memory (CAM) devices are frequently used in network switching and routing applications to determine forwarding destinations for data packets. A CAM device can be instructed to compare a selected portion of an incoming packet (e.g., a destination address extracted from the packet header) with CAM words (e.g., forwarding address) stored in an array within the CAM device. If there is a matching entry stored in the CAM array, the index of the matching CAM word can be used to access a corresponding location in an associated memory device to retrieve a destination address and/or other routing information for the packet.
A CAM device includes a CAM array having a plurality of CAM cells organized in a number of rows and columns. Each row of CAM cells, which can be used to store a CAM word, is coupled to a corresponding match line that indicates match results for the row. Each column of CAM cells is typically coupled to one or more data lines or data line pairs that can be used to drive data into a selected CAM row during write operations and/or for providing a search key to the CAM rows during compare operations. During a compare operation, the search key (e.g., the comparand word) is provided to the CAM array and compared with the CAM words stored therein. For each CAM word that matches the search key, a corresponding match line is asserted to indicate the match result. If any of the match lines are asserted, a match flag is asserted to indicate the match condition, and a priority encoder determines the match address or index of the highest priority matching entry in the CAM array.
CAM arrays typically include either binary CAM cells that store binary data values (i.e., a logic “1” or a logic “0” value) or ternary CAM cells that store ternary data values (i.e., a logic “1” value, a logic “0” values, or a don't care value). Ternary CAM cells store a data bit and a mask bit. For example, when a mask bit within a ternary CAM cell is inactive (e.g., set to a logic 1 value), the ternary CAM cell operates as a conventional binary CAM cell storing an “unmasked” data bit. When the mask bit is active (e.g., set to a logic 0 value), the ternary CAM cell is treated as storing a “don't care” value, which means that all compare operations performed on the actively masked ternary CAM cell will result in a cell match condition.
Note that the XY CAM cell 100 stores a data value as a complimentary bit pair, where the Y bit stores the binary data value and the X bit stores the complemented binary data value. This allows XY CAM cell 100 to perform faster compare operations than conventional ternary CAM cells.
However, to keep up with demand for ever-increasing search rates, it would be desirable to increase the speed of XY CAM cells.
Present embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Fast quaternary (XY) CAM cells including compare circuits having a reduced stack are disclosed. These CAM cells can be used in a wide variety of CAM architectures and applications for which speed is important. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, specific nomenclature is set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present embodiments. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details may not be required to practice the present embodiments. In other instances, well-known circuits and devices are shown in block diagram form to avoid obscuring the present embodiments unnecessarily. Additionally, the interconnection between circuit elements or blocks may be shown as buses or as single signal lines. Each of the buses may alternatively be a single signal line, and each of the single signal lines may alternatively be a bus. Further, the logic levels assigned to various signals in the description below are arbitrary, and therefore may be modified (e.g., reversed polarity) as desired. Accordingly, the present embodiments are not to be construed as limited to specific examples described herein but rather includes within its scope all embodiments defined by the appended claims.
More specifically, CAM cells architected in accordance with present embodiments include a compare circuit that has a fewer number of pull-down transistors coupled between the match line and ground potential than conventional CAM cells, which in turn increases the speed of compare operations performed by such CAM cells. More specifically, by reducing the size of the pull-down stack of the CAM cell's compare circuit, the capacitive load on the match line is reduced, which in turn allows the match line to be charged and discharged more quickly than CAM cells having larger compare stacks. In addition, reducing the number of pull-down transistors between the match line and ground potential also reduces the resistance of the compare stack, which increases search speeds. Further, the reduced match line capacitance resulting from the fewer number of pull-down transistors in the compare stack may also reduce power consumption.
One or more instructions and related control signals may be provided to CAM device 200 from an instruction decoder (not shown for simplicity) to control read, write, compare, and other operations for CAM device 200. Other well-known signals that can be provided to CAM device 200, such as enable signals, clock signals, and power connections, are not shown for simplicity. Further, although not shown in
Each row of CAM cells (not shown in
The match lines ML provide match results for compare operations between comparand data (e.g., a search key) and data stored in CAM array 210. Priority encoder 250, which is well-known, uses the match results indicated on the match lines and latched in the match latches 212 to determine the matching entry that has the highest priority number associated with it and generates the index or address of this highest priority match (HPM). In addition, priority encoder 250 may use the validity bits from CAM array 210 to generate the next free address that is available in CAM array 210 for storing new data. Although not shown in
Match logic 260, which is well-known, uses the match results indicated on the match lines to generate a match flag (MF) indicative of a match condition in CAM array 210. If there is more than one matching entry in CAM array 210, match logic 260 may generate a multiple match flag MF to indicate a multiple match condition. In addition, match logic 260 may use the validity bits from CAM array 210 to assert a full flag when all of the rows of CAM cells in CAM array 210 are filled with valid entries.
Each column of CAM cells (not shown in
Prior to compare operations, the match lines are pre-charged (e.g., to logic high), and each set of complementary comparand line pairs CL/CLB are driven to the same predetermined logic level (e.g., to logic high). Then, during compare operations, the comparand register 230 provides the search key (i.e., the comparand word) to the CAM cells 202 by driving each pair of complementary comparand lines CL/CLB to opposite logic states indicative of the corresponding bit of the search key. For example, to provide a logic low comparand bit (C) to a column of CAM cells, the corresponding comparand line CL is driven to a first logic state (e.g., logic low) and the corresponding complementary comparand line CLB is driven to a second logic state (e.g., logic high); conversely, to provide a logic high comparand bit C to the column of CAM cells, the corresponding comparand line CL is driven to the second logic state (e.g., logic high) and the corresponding complementary comparand line CLB is driven to the first logic state (e.g., logic low). Thereafter, if all the CAM cells 202 in a particular row match the corresponding bits of the search key, then the match line ML remains in its logic high state to indicate the match condition. Conversely, if one or more of the CAM cells 202 in the row do not match the corresponding bit of the search key, then mismatching CAM cells 202 discharge the match line (e.g., to ground potential) to indicate the mismatch condition.
More specifically, the logic “0” and “1” states correspond to the logic states represented by a conventional binary CAM cell. For each of these states, if the comparand data (e.g., provided to CAM cell 400 via complementary comparand lines CL and CLB) matches the data stored in CAM cell 400, the compare circuit 420 does not discharge the match line ML, which remains in its charged state to indicate a match condition. Conversely, if the comparand data does not match the data stored in CAM cell 400, compare circuit 420 discharges ML (e.g., toward ground potential) to indicate the mismatch condition. For the “don't care” state, the logic low values for X and Y cause compare circuit 420 to remain in a non-conductive state, thereby preventing the match line from discharging. In this manner, the data value D stored in CAM cell 400 is masked from the compare operation, thereby forcing a match condition for CAM cell 400, regardless of the comparand data. For the “invalid” state, the logic high values for X and Y cause the compare circuit 420 to remain in a conductive state to discharge the match line to indicate a mismatch condition, irrespective of the comparand data. For some embodiments, the “invalid” state can be used to disable a row of CAM array 210 containing one or more XY CAM cells 400, for example, as described in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,865,098, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The compare circuit 420 includes two match line pull-down transistors 421x and 421y, two pass transistors 422x and 422y, and two gating transistors 423x and 423y. A first group of transistors 421x, 422x, and 423x form a first selective pull-down circuit 425x that selectively discharges the match line ML in response to a comparison with the complemented comparand bit (C) provided on CLB and the first data bit (X), and a second group of transistors 421y, 422y, and 423y form a second selective pull-down circuit 425y that selectively discharges the match line ML in response to a comparison with the comparand bit (C) provided on CL and the second data bit (Y).
More specifically, for the first selective pull-down circuit 425x, the NMOS match line pull-down transistor 421x is coupled between the match line and ground potential, and has a gate tied to a first node (Nx) that, in turn, is selectively coupled to receive X from the first memory cell 410x via the PMOS pass transistor 422x. The NMOS gating transistor 423x is coupled between the gate of match line pull-down transistor 421x and ground potential. The common gates of transistors 422x and 423x are coupled to the complementary comparand line CLB, and receive the complemented comparand bit (C) during compare operations. For the second selective pull-down circuit 425y, the NMOS match line pull-down transistor 421y is coupled between the match line and ground potential, and has a gate tied to a second node (Ny) that, in turn, is selectively coupled to receive Y from the second memory cell 410y via the PMOS pass transistor 422y. The NMOS gating transistor 423y is coupled between the gate of match line pull-down transistor 421y and ground potential. The common gates of transistors 422y and 423y are coupled to the comparand line CL, and receive the comparand bit (C) during compare operations.
For other embodiments, the first node Nx can be coupled to receive the complemented first data bit
An exemplary compare operation between a comparand bit C and a data value D stored in the CAM cell 400 is now described. During a pre-charge phase of the compare operation, the match line ML is pre-charged to logic high (e.g., towards VDD) by a suitable pre-charge circuit (not shown for simplicity), and the comparand lines CL/CLB are both pre-charged to logic high (e.g., towards VDD). The logic high state of CLB turns on NMOS transistor 423x and turns off PMOS transistor 422x. The conductive state of transistor 423x pulls the gate of match line pull-down transistor 421x (e.g., at node Nx) low towards ground potential, thereby maintaining transistor 421x in a non-conductive state to isolate the match line ML from ground potential. The non-conductive state of transistor 422x isolates the first memory cell 410x from node Nx, thereby preventing the value of X from being pulled low to ground potential by the conductive NMOS transistor 423x. Similarly, the logic high state of CL turns on NMOS transistor 423y and turns off PMOS transistor 422y. The conductive state of transistor 423y pulls the gate of match line pull-down transistor 421y (e.g., at node Ny) low towards ground potential, thereby maintaining transistor 421y in a non-conductive state to isolate the match line ML from ground potential. The non-conductive state of transistor 422y isolates the second memory cell 410y from node Ny, thereby preventing the value of Y from being pulled low to ground potential by the conductive NMOS transistor 423y.
Then, during an evaluation phase of the compare operation, the comparand bit C is provided in a complementary manner to the XY CAM cell 400 via comparand lines CL and CLB. If a comparand line is driven to logic high, then the corresponding selective pull-down circuit 425 is disabled and does not discharge the match line ML. Conversely, if a comparand line is driven to logic low, then the corresponding selective pull-down circuit 425 is enabled and selectively discharges the match line ML in response to the corresponding data bit provided by the associated memory cell 410. If both CL and CLB are driven to logic high (e.g., to achieve a column-masking function), then both selective pull-down circuits 425x and 425y are disabled and together prevent the match line ML from discharging, thereby causing the CAM cell 400 to indicate a match condition on ML irrespective of the data value D.
For one example, if the comparand bit is logic high (e.g., C=1 and
The XY CAM cell 400 operates in a complementary manner for compare operations in which the comparand bit is logic low (e.g., C=0 and
In accordance with the present embodiments, the compare circuit 420 of XY CAM cell 400 includes only one transistor (e.g., transistor 421) in each pull-down path between the match line and ground potential, as shown in
The second compare circuit 520 includes two match line pull-down transistors 521x and 521y, two pass transistors 522x and 522y, and two gating transistors 523x and 523y. A first group of transistors 521x, 522x, and 523x form a first selective pull-down circuit 525x that selectively discharges the second match line ML2 in response to a comparison with the complemented second comparand bit (
More specifically, for the first selective pull-down circuit 525x, the NMOS match line pull-down transistor 521x is coupled between the second match line ML2 and ground potential, and has a gate tied to a third node (Mx) that, in turn, is selectively coupled to receive X from the first memory cell 410x via the PMOS pass transistor 522x. The NMOS gating transistor 523x is coupled between the gate of match line pull-down transistor 521x and ground potential. The common gates of transistors 522x and 523x are coupled to the second complementary comparand line CL2B, and receive the complemented second comparand bit (
Compare operations for XY CAM cell 500 are performed in a manner similar to that described above with respect to CAM cell 400 of
Then, during the evaluation phase of the compare operation, the first comparand bit C1 is provided to the XY CAM cell 500 in a complementary manner via comparand lines CL1 and CL1B, and the second comparand bit C2 is provided to the XY CAM cell 500 in a complementary manner via comparand lines CL2 and CL2B. If a comparand line is driven to logic high, then the corresponding selective pull-down circuit 425/525 is disabled and does not discharge its associated match line ML. Conversely, if a comparand line is driven to logic low, then the corresponding selective pull-down circuit 425/525 is enabled and selectively discharges its associated match line ML in response to the corresponding data bit provided by the associated memory cell 410. More specifically, if both CL1 and CL1B are driven to logic high (e.g., to achieve a column-masking function), then both selective pull-down circuits 425x and 425y are disabled and together prevent the first match line ML1 from discharging, thereby causing the CAM cell 500 to indicate a match condition on ML1 irrespective of the data value D. Similarly, if both CL2 and CL2B are driven to logic high (e.g., to achieve a column-masking function), then both selective pull-down circuits 525x and 525y are disabled and together prevent the second match line ML2 from discharging, thereby causing the CAM cell 500 to indicate a match condition on ML2 irrespective of the data value D.
Similar to the first compare circuit 420, the second compare circuit 520 of XY CAM cell 500 includes only one transistor (e.g., transistor 521) in each pull-down path between the second match line ML2 and ground potential, as shown in
While particular embodiments have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from this disclosure in its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this disclosure.
Further, it should be noted that the various circuits disclosed herein may be described using computer aided design tools and expressed (or represented), as data and/or instructions embodied in various computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, transistor, layout geometries, and/or other characteristics. Formats of files and other objects in which such circuit expressions may be implemented include, but are not limited to, formats supporting behavioral languages such as C, Verilog, and VHDL, formats supporting register level description languages like RTL, and formats supporting geometry description languages such as GDSII, GDSIII, GDSIV, CIF, MEBES and any other suitable formats and languages. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media).
This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of the co-pending and commonly owned U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/378,808 entitled “Fast Quaternary CAM Cell” filed on Aug. 31, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3665422 | McCoy et al. | May 1972 | A |
4112502 | Scheuneman | Sep 1978 | A |
4747080 | Yamada | May 1988 | A |
4779226 | Haraszti | Oct 1988 | A |
4791606 | Threewitt et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4903268 | Hidaka et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4958352 | Noguchi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4991136 | Mihara | Feb 1991 | A |
5046046 | Sweha et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5127014 | Raynham | Jun 1992 | A |
5184325 | Lipovski | Feb 1993 | A |
5233614 | Singh | Aug 1993 | A |
5311462 | Wells | May 1994 | A |
5319589 | Yamagata et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319590 | Montoye | Jun 1994 | A |
5450424 | Okugaki et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452243 | Ansel et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455834 | Chang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469450 | Cho et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5491703 | Barnaby et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5561429 | Halberstam et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570377 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572460 | Lien | Nov 1996 | A |
5604753 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5629950 | Godiwala et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642320 | Jang | Jun 1997 | A |
5644583 | Garcia et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5682394 | Blake et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5699369 | Guha | Dec 1997 | A |
5724296 | Jang | Mar 1998 | A |
5727003 | Zook | Mar 1998 | A |
5761222 | Baldi | Jun 1998 | A |
5796671 | Wahlstrom | Aug 1998 | A |
5796758 | Levitan | Aug 1998 | A |
5872802 | Knaack et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5890201 | McLellan et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6009548 | Chen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6032214 | Farmwald et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058500 | DesJardins et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067656 | Rusu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6128207 | Lien et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134631 | Jennings, III | Oct 2000 | A |
6137707 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151247 | Estakhri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154384 | Nataraj et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6188629 | Kaplinsky | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199140 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216246 | Shau | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219815 | DesJardins et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233717 | Choi | May 2001 | B1 |
6243281 | Pereira | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262907 | Lien et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289471 | Gordon | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324087 | Pereira | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6362990 | Gibson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362993 | Henderson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374325 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381191 | Ooishi | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6385070 | Peterson | May 2002 | B1 |
6397290 | Williams et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400593 | Lien et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408417 | Moudgal et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418042 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421265 | Lien et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430073 | Batson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434033 | Chien | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6460112 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470418 | Lien et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477615 | Tanaka | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480406 | Jin et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496399 | Choi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505270 | Voelkel et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538911 | Allan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542391 | Pereira et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560156 | Lien et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6563754 | Lien et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564754 | Cohen | May 2003 | B1 |
6597595 | Ichiriu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6618281 | Gordon | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6646900 | Tsuda et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665220 | Vlasenko | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6690595 | Srinivasan et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700810 | Ichiriu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6700827 | Lien et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707693 | Ichiriu | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721202 | Roge et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728124 | Ichiriu et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741253 | Radke et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6760241 | Gharia | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6760881 | Batson et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775168 | Park et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807077 | Noda et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6842360 | Srinivasan | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845026 | Gharia | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6856527 | Srinivasan et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865098 | Ichiriu et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6867989 | Roy | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6888731 | Roth et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900999 | Yen et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7009862 | Higeta et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7050318 | Argyres | May 2006 | B1 |
7133302 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7298635 | Maheshwari | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7433217 | Maheshwarl | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7499303 | Lien et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7924588 | Arsovski et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7944724 | Chu | May 2011 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 13/216,104, filed Aug. 23, 2011, Quaternary Content Addressable Memory Cell Having One Transistor Pull-Down Stack, Dimitri Argyres. |
Application Note An-94 “Error Detection and Correction with IDT49C466”, released by Integrated Device Technology, Inc., pp. 131-141, (1996). |
F. Halsall, Data Communications, Computer Networks and OSI, 2d. Ed., pp. 499-508, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co. (1998). |
Fourouzan, Behrouz, “Introduction to Telecommunications and Networking.” Chapter 8, pp. 194-226, Aug. 1997. |
Kalter et al., “A 50-ns 16-Mb DRAM with a 10-ns Data Rate and On-Chip ECC,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits vol. 25, No. 5, Oct. 1990 pp. 1118-1127. |
SiberCore Technologies, Soft Error in TCAMS: Causes and Cures, Jul. 2003, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Action, dated Nov. 23, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,878, filed May 31, 2011, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 10, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,885, filed May 31, 2011, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,878, entitled “Ternary Contest Addressable Memory Cell Having Single Transistor Pull-Down Stack,” filed May 31, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,885, entitled “Ternary Contest Addressable Memory Cell Having Two Transistor Pull-Down Stack,” filed May 31, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/216,104, entitled “Quaternary Content Addressable Memory Cell having One Transistor Pull-Down Stack,” filed Aug. 23, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Mar. 7, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,878, filed May 31, 2011, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 29, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,885, filed May 31, 2011, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61378808 | Aug 2010 | US |