The present invention relates to sprinklers used in automatic fire extinguisher systems for buildings and the like, and in particular, relates to a fast response sprinkler head and fire sprinkler system for use in environments wherein one or more obstructions are positioned in proximity to the sprinkler head.
Automatic sprinklers have long been used in automatic fire extinguishing systems for buildings in order to disburse a fluid to control a fire. Typically, the fluid utilized in such systems is water, although systems have also been developed to disburse foam and other materials. Historically, sprinkler heads include a solid metal base connected to a pressurized supply of water, and some type of deflector used to alter the trajectory of the water flow. Alteration of the water flow by the deflector generates a defined spray distribution pattern over the protected area. The deflector is typically spaced from the outlet of the base by a frame, and a fusible trigger assembly secures a seal over the central orifice. When the temperature surrounding the sprinkler head is elevated to a pre-selected value indicative of a fire, the fusible trigger assembly releases the seal and water flow is initiated through the sprinkler head.
Fire extinguishing sprinkler heads come in three general structural types, namely, upright, pendent and sidewall. Of interest to the present application are the pendent type and, in particular, upright structural type. Pendent sprinklers depend below a fire extinguishing fluid supply pipe, such as a water pipe. In pendent sprinklers, when the fusible trigger assembly reaches a pre-selected temperature due to the presence of fire, the fusible trigger assembly releases the seal positioned over the outlet, enabling water to flow through the central orifice of the sprinkler head in a downward direction. As the water exits from the sprinkler head, it is typically disbursed by the deflector which alters the trajectory of the water so as to define a spray distribution pattern in an attempt to control the fire.
An upright sprinkler differs from a pendent sprinkler in that it projects upwardly from the fluid supply pipe. When an upright sprinkler is activated, the water flows upward through the sprinkler head and is expelled from the central orifice in an upward direction. Gravitational forces, in combination with the deflector spaced a pre-selected distance above the central orifice, results in the formation of a downwardly moving spray distribution pattern in an attempt to control a fire. In addition to some common benefits and advantages, pendent and upright sprinklers each have some benefits relative to the other type. Upright sprinklers for example, have less of a tendency to collect contaminant build-up since the containments settle down into the branch pipe and thus potential blockage is reduced.
Historically, automatic sprinkler systems have been designed to achieve what is referred to as “fire control” about a protected area. In the fire control method of combating fires, the automatic sprinkler system is designed and installed such that a relatively large number of individual sprinklers will activate upon detection of a fire. That is, in response to a fire, not only will the sprinklers closest to the fire be actuated, but also sprinklers which protect the areas surrounding the fire, so as to define a controlled area. While it is anticipated that the sprinklers immediately above the fire may not be able to extinguish the fire, the goal of the fire control method is to actuate the sprinklers about the fire to pre-wet the combustible materials in the fire's general vicinity to prohibit the fire's growth. Thus, the fire control method seeks to confine the fire within a predetermined area until additional fire fighting methods are deployed, such as response by a fire department, in order to extinguish the fire.
Beginning in the 1970's, industries began more widely using relatively large warehouses for the storage of product. To effectively utilize space within these warehouses, product is normally stacked on pallets or racks in a vertical arrangement. These warehouses may reach approximately 30 feet in height and contain stacked pallets as high as approximately 25 feet. Traditional sprinklers, designed and installed so as to provide “fire control,” have proven ineffective in combating fires ignited in these large warehouses. As the vertically stacked pallets may exceed over twenty feet in height, fires ignited within these pallets produce a plume of combustion gasses which rapidly travels upward and subsequently impacts the ceiling of the warehouse. The rapid generation of these combustion gases creates a zone of high temperature above the fire, and thus when the sprinkler head is activated, an unacceptable quantity of water expelled from the sprinkler is evaporated within this high temperature zone before it reaches the site of the fire. As a result, less water is actually delivered to the fire and hence prevents effective fire control.
After impacting the ceiling, these combustion gases span out in a horizontal direction along the surface of the ceiling. The rapid movement of the combustion gases along the ceiling results in the actuation of a large number of sprinkler heads located a remote distance from the perimeter of the fire. The mass actuation of sprinkler heads within the warehouse produces several unacceptable consequences. First, the near simultaneous actuation of a large number of sprinkler heads produces a significant decrease in the water pressure delivered to each individual sprinkler head. Consequently, less water is available for delivery to the fire and thereby provides an opportunity for the fire to spread. Furthermore, actuation of remotely located sprinkler heads results in water damage to the product protected by such sprinklers.
In response to the inadequacies of existing sprinkler heads and the “fire control” deployment method, the sprinkler industry began the design and installation of “Early Suppression Fast Response” (hereinafter referred to as “ESFR”) sprinkler heads. As the name indicates, the theory behind ESFR is to deliver a sufficient quantity of water during the early stages of fire development in order to suppress and extinguish the fire and deny the opportunity for fire growth. In order to achieve the goal of early suppression, ESFR sprinklers must quickly generate a sufficient quantity of water capable of penetrating the fire plume and thus be delivered to the core of the fire, often referred to in the industry as the “fuel package.” To deliver a sufficient quantity of water to the “fuel package”, ESFR sprinklers are equipped with a thermally sensitive fusible trigger assembly capable of actuating the sprinkler head shortly after ignition of the fuel package. Normally, ESFR sprinklers utilize fusible trigger assemblies which have a fusing temperature between approximately 155° F. and 175° F.
To determine the ability of these ESFR sprinklers to suppress high challenge fires generated by industrial warehouses, the sprinkler industry, and in particular the Factory Mutual Research Corporation (hereinafter “FMRC”), developed the concepts of actual delivered density (hereinafter “ADD”), required delivered density (hereinafter “RDD”), and response time index (hereinafter “RTI”) as quantifiable measures of sprinkler performance. The RDD is the amount of water that must be delivered to a fuel package composed of a particular type of combustible material in order to achieve suppression. The establishment of a RDD value for a particular fuel package is achieved by various tests most oftenly conducted by the FMRC. The ADD value depends on the construction of the particular sprinkler head and is defined as the amount of water which is actually deposited onto the top of a combustible fuel package. Generally speaking, the RDD value increases as a function of time once ignition of the fuel package is initiated. During the maturation of the fire, the RDD increases as a function of time because as the fire develops, more combustion gases are generated and thus more water must be generated due to the quantity of water evaporated by the fire plume. The ADD generally decreases as a function of time, until the fire reaches full maturation. The decrease in the ADD as a function of time is also due to the growth of the fire plume, which results in an increasing water evaporation rate, and thus reduces the quantity of water actually delivered to the fuel package. Under the ESFR theory, early suppression is achieved if the ADD is greater than the RDD.
The ADD value of a particular sprinkler is largely a function of the discharge coefficient or “K” value. The K value is defined by the following equation:
k=q/√{square root over (p)}
The RTI value is essentially a measure of the thermal sensitivity of the fusible trigger assembly which actuates the sprinkler head. Consequently, the lower the RTI value of a particular sprinkler, the faster the actuation time of the sprinkler head in response to a fire, which in turn decreases the ADD value necessary to extinguish the fire.
Since the advent of ESFR sprinklers in the 1970's, the sprinkler industry has attempted to design upright sprinklers having the ADD values necessary to adequately suppress a fire. Despite these attempts, heretofore, the industry has been unable to generate an upright sprinkler head capable of achieving ESFR standards, and has only produced pendent sprinklers having the requisite ADD criteria. The inability of the industry to generate an ESFR sprinkler having an upright design has presented problems in the industry, specifically, in the retrofitting of warehouses. Prior to the advent of ESFR sprinklers, many warehouses employed traditional upright sprinkler assemblies. Consequently, retrofitting warehouses designed to accommodate upright sprinklers with ESFR pendent sprinklers has required warehouse owners to tear out existing piping and replace the same with piping capable of supporting pendent ESFR sprinklers. This, in turn, has increased the cost and complexity of installing an ESFR sprinkler system.
In order to provide uniformity in the design and installation of sprinkler systems, as well as to maximize the probability that the installed sprinkler system will operate in an effective manner, the National Fire Protection Association (hereinafter referred to as the “NFPA”) generates criteria or regulations for both the design and installation of fire sprinkler systems. The NFPA is comprised of a wide cross-section of companies and organizations having expertise and interest in fire protection safety. The first set of regulations issued by the NFPA occurred at the beginning of the 20th Century and has been continuously updated in light of advances and changes in technology. The NFPA regulations or guidelines are based on data gained by over one hundred years of experience in the evaluation of sprinkler systems. Compliance with NFPA guidelines, in particular NFPA 13, which governs the installation of sprinkler systems (discussed hereinafter in detail), is frequently required by federal and state enforcement agencies, and is accepted by the insurance industry as the definitive guideline concerning the installation and design of sprinkler systems. Consequently, as a commercial practicality, sprinkler designs and the installation of sprinkler systems must be able to perform successfully within the guidelines set by the NFPA, and in particular NFPA 13. Failure to conform or operate successfully within the NFPA guidelines effectively prohibits the commercial viability of a particular sprinkler design or its installation.
In addition to providing guidelines concerning the design and installation of sprinklers, the FMRC, in conjunction with the NFPA, have established “commodity” classifications which categorizes materials commonly found in warehouses or storage facilities. Each commodity classification segregates materials according to their degree of combustibility and the operating requirements necessary to extinguish them. For each of these commodities, a particular sprinkler head must meet certain water supply and discharge requirements in order to provide adequate protection. Currently, materials are classified in the following commodity classifications: class 1 through 4, carton unexpanded plastic, cartoned expanded plastic, uncartoned unexpanded plastic and uncartoned expanded plastic. Of these commodities, uncartoned unexpanded and expanded plastic commodities represent the two most challenging fire hazards, with uncartoned expanded plastic carton commodities representing the most challenging fire scenario.
Of particular importance to the present invention are those sections of NFPA 13 which govern the installation of ESFR sprinklers in areas having obstructions supported by and depending from, or otherwise supported below, the ceiling of a warehouse or enclosure. The 1996 Edition of NFPA 13 provides specific spatial requirements concerning the placement of ESFR sprinklers in proximity to obstructions that prevent the sprinkler from developing an effective spray distribution pattern. Specifically, §4-11.5.2 is directed to the issue of obstruction to sprinkler discharge in ESFR sprinklers, and defines a minimum horizontal or lateral distance that the sprinkler head must be placed from the obstruction. NFPA 13 (1996 ed.), §4-11.5.2 states as follows:
Figure 4-11.5.2, referenced in §4-11.5.2 of NFPA 13 (1996 ed.) is reproduced herein as
The 1999 edition of NFPA 13 § 5-11.5.1 details the requirements of ESFR sprinklers when obstructions are present at or near the ceiling and states as follows:
Table 5-11.5.1 and FIG. 5-11.5.1 are reproduced herein as
Furthermore, § 5-11.5.3 of NFPA 13 (1999 ed.) provides guidelines concerning continuous obstructions located below the ESFR sprinklers of a sprinkler system and provides:
Finally, § 5-11.5.3.2 of an NFPA 13 (1999 ed.) requires:
Thus, it can be seen from the above cited sections of both the 1996 and 1999 edition of NFPA 13 that various guidelines and regulations govern the installation of ESFR sprinklers in applications where the area to be protected includes one or more types of obstructions. It is believed that the sections cited above from NFPA 13 (1999 ed.) define and clarify additional guidelines concerning the installation of ESFR sprinkler systems, and acts as a supplement to § 4-11.5.2 of NFPA 13 (1996 ed.).
Conformance with the above cited sections of NFPA 13, has heretofore been a practical necessity governing the installation of all ESFR sprinkler assemblies due to the inability of sprinkler manufacturers to produce an ESFR sprinkler head having the requisite ADD value for a fuel package consisting of a particular type of combustible material, which is also capable of developing a spray distribution pattern in proximity to these obstructions. Conformance with NFPA 13 (1996 ed.) §4-11.5.2, and the above-referenced sections of NFPA 13 (1999 ed.) has added additional cost to the installation of sprinkler systems by requiring the placement of additional sprinklers in areas surrounding the obstruction. Furthermore, the various sections of NFPA 13 (1999 ed.) has increased the complexity of the installation procedure of ESFR sprinklers in areas wherein obstructions are present. In addition, as a conventionally sized warehouse or storage facility may contain many different types of obstructions, the installation of sprinkler systems in these facilities is often a complex procedure. Moreover, in certain circumstances, adherence to NFPA 13 (1996 ed.) §4-11.5.2, and the various sections of NFPA 13 (1999 ed.) has resulted in particular areas receiving only a marginal quantity of water and thus, are particularly vulnerable to the generation and growth of a fire. That is, in order to satisfy the above cited sections of NFPA 13, it is often necessary to place a sprinkler head on both sides of the obstruction. Consequently, when the site of ignition is directly, or approximately directly, under the obstruction, only the outer periphery of the spray distribution pattern of both the sprinkler heads reach the conflagration. As a result, fires generated proximate to these obstructions have an increased opportunity to grow and spread to adjoining areas given the often marginal protection afforded by the pair of sprinkler heads.
Consequently, there exists a need for a fast response, upright sprinkler which can effectively provide a spray distribution pattern when used in proximity to obstructions and can provide the necessary ADD values required to suppress or extinguish a fire.
Accordingly, the present invention is embodied in a fast response upright sprinkler head. The sprinkler head, according to one aspect of the invention, includes a sprinkler body configured for attachment to a fire extinguishing fluid supply line. The sprinkler body is formed with an orifice in fluid communication with the fire extinguishing fluid supply line, and has a K value of at least approximately 13.5. A fusible trigger assembly, coupled to the sprinkler body, exerts a sealing force upon a sealing assembly and has a fusing temperature of between approximately 155° F. and 175° F. Providing an upright sprinkler head having both a K value of at least 13.5 and a fusible trigger assembly responsive in the temperature range of between 155° F. and 175° F. results in a fast response sprinkler which may be used in applications where suppression and/or extinguishment of a fire, in contrast to control thereof, is required.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a fire sprinkler system is provided for suppressing a fire in an enclosure, wherein the enclosure contains at least one generally horizontal obstruction of a preselected dimension positioned below the ceiling, and above the floor. The enclosure contains a particular commodity classification, and the fire sprinkler system includes a fire extinguishing fluid supply line having a diameter less than or equal approximately 3.0 inches. At least one upright sprinkler head is attached to the fluid supply line and in fluid communication therewith. The upright sprinkler head is positioned along the fire extinguishing fluid supply line such that the lateral or horizontal distance between the upright sprinkler head and the obstruction is less than approximately three times the width or outer diameter of the obstruction, depending upon the shape of the obstruction. The use of an upright sprinkler head which is placed a horizontal distance less than approximately three times the width or outer diameter of the obstruction reduces the complexity involved in the installation of a sprinkler system and provides increased protection for enclosures having obstructions.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method for suppressing a fire in an enclosure having at least one generally horizontal obstruction supported a preselected distance below the ceiling includes the steps of providing a fire extinguishing fluid supply line within the enclosure having a diameter less than or equal to approximately 3.0 inches and attaching at least one upright sprinkler to the fire extinguishing fluid supply line. The upright sprinkler has a K value greater than or equal to approximately 13.5, and a fusible trigger assembly having a fusing temperature between approximately 155° F. and 175° F. Utilizing an upright sprinkler having a K value greater than 13.5 and a trigger assembly having a fusing temperature in the range of 155° F. to 175° F., in combination with a 3.0 inch or less diameter fluid supply line, provides an effective method for extinguishing or suppressing a fire.
According to still yet another aspect of the present invention, an upright sprinkler head is disclosed having a sprinkler body configured for attachment to a fire extinguishing fluid supply line and having a K value of at least approximately 13.5. A deflector is coupled to the sprinkler body and has an impact surface configured to generate an optimum spray distribution pattern of fire extinguishing fluid over an area to be protected. The deflector includes a generally planar member having a perimeter and a skirt depending outwardly therefrom at a preselected angle from the vertical, which is between approximately 12° and 26°. An annular ledge extends horizontally from the skirt. The combination of a K value of at least 13.5 and a deflector having a planar member, a skirt depending outwardly therefrom at a preselected angle, and an annular ledge provides an effective upright sprinkler head for use in suppressing or extinguishing a fire.
According to still yet another aspect of the invention, a fire sprinkler system for use in suppressing a fire in an enclosure having at least one generally horizontal obstruction with a preselected dimension positioned below the ceiling and above the floor, and containing a particular commodity classification includes a fire extinguishing fluid supply line having a diameter less than or equal to approximately 3.0 inches, and at least one upright sprinkler having a deflector and extending from the fire extinguishing fluid supply line. The at least one upright sprinkler includes a K value of at least approximately 13.5, and includes a fusible trigger assembly having fusing temperature between approximately 155° F. and 175° F. The deflector of the at least one upright sprinkler is positioned a preselected vertical distance above the bottom of the obstruction. Utilizing the upright sprinkler head of the present invention permits its placement a horizontal distance above the obstructions, which in turn greatly simplifies the installation of the sprinkler system and thus reduces costs.
According to a further aspect of the invention, a fusible link for a sprinkler head having a first lever and a second lever comprises a first plate formed with a first channel and at least one air aperture, and a second plate formed with a second channel and at least one air aperture. A layer of head fusible material joins the first and second plate. The first and second channel extend in opposite directions and the at least one air aperture of the first plate is in registration with the at least one air aperture of the second plate when the fusible link is in the assembled condition. The use of registering air apertures in the fusible link provides air passages to increase the convective heat flow through the fusible link, and hence increases response time, enabling the fusible link to be used in applications wherein fast response is necessary to suppress or extinguish a fire.
The present invention provides a fast response upright sprinkler head capable of discharging a sufficient output of water or other fire extinguishing fluid, and effectively alters the trajectory of the water so as to develop a spray distribution pattern about a preselected area. The spray distribution pattern generated by the sprinkler head of the present invention provides an ADD in excess of the RDD for a given fuel package, and thus permits the sprinkler head to be used in commercial or industrial warehouse applications requiring fire suppression. Additionally, by using the fast response upright sprinklers of the present invention, a fire extinguishing system can be implemented wherein the fast response upright sprinkler head is placed in proximity to, and horizontally above, an obstruction. The ability to place the fast response, upright sprinkler head in proximity to these obstructions enables the fast response upright sprinkler head to provide an optimum spray distribution pattern about the obstruction and thereby provides greater fire protection in the event a fuel package is ignited directly below or approximately directly below the obstruction.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims, and drawings.
a is an exploded perspective view of the fusible link of the fast response upright sprinkler head depicted in
a is a side view of the pin depicted in
According to one aspect, the present invention is embodied in a fast response upright sprinkler head. The fast response upright sprinkler head generates a sufficient flow rate of water during the initial stage of fire development and develops an optimum spray distribution pattern capable of delivering an actual delivered density in excess of the required delivered density for a given fuel package to thereby permit a fire to be suppressed or extinguished. Although the sprinkler head of the present invention may be used to protect any area, it is particularly suited for use within a commercial or industrial warehouse where the ceiling may reach a height of approximately 30 feet, and the height of storage or product contained within the warehouse may reach a height of approximately 25 feet.
Referring now to
Sprinkler body 20 includes an externally threaded bottom region 24, allowing sprinkler body 20 to be rotatably attached to a fire extinguishing fluid supply line or pipe. A central orifice 26 is formed in sprinkler body 20. Central orifice 26 provides a fluid flow passageway enabling the expulsion of fire extinguishing fluid from outlet 27 of central orifice 26 in response to a fire.
A pair of arcuately shaped frame arms 42 and 44 extend from exterior surface 21 of sprinkler body 20 and project beyond top region 22. Arcuate frame arms 42 and 44 define yoke 40. Apex 46 of yoke 40 is formed with a central member or boss 48 having formed therethrough an internally threaded aperture or bore 49. A conically shaped protrusion 47 extends from surface 45 of both arms 42 and 44 of yoke 40. The purpose of protrusions 47 is to prevent contact between arms 42, 44 and fusible trigger assembly 60. Fusible trigger assembly 60 consists of a male arm or lever 62, a complimentary female arm or lever 64 and a fusible link 66. End 63 of male lever 62 engages a sealing assembly 70 positioned in sealing contact with outlet 27 of sprinkler body 20. End 65 of female lever 64 is positioned in contact with a threaded screw 50 positioned in threaded bore 49 of boss 48.
Fusible link 66 may be any thermally responsive fusible link commonly utilized in the industry having a fusing temperature within the range required by early suppression fast response sprinkler heads. As used herein, “fusing temperature” means the temperature at which the adhesive or solder used in fusible link 66 liquefies, causing the release of trigger assembly 60, and thereby the actuation of sprinkler head 20. In order to permit sprinkler body 20 to deliver an appropriate quantity of fire extinguishing fluid during the initial stages of fire development, fusible link 66 may be any fusible link having a fusing temperature of between approximately 155° F. and 175° F., more preferably between approximately 159° F. and 171° F., and most preferably, approximately 165° F.
As shown in
Each plate 130, 132, includes a center hole 138 placed in registration with the center hole 138 of the other plate 130, 132. One or more air apertures 139 are formed in each plate 130 and 132, and positioned in registration with the opposing air aperture 139 formed in plate 130, 132. Center hole 138 and air apertures 139, enable the migration of air through fusible link 66 to thereby result in the timely separation of plates 130, 132, when the appropriate temperature is reached in response to a fire. Fusible link 66 of
Sealing assembly 70 includes a sealing ring 72, an arcuately shaped hollow plug 76 and an insert member 78. Sealing ring 72 is placed within outlet 27 of sprinkler body 20 and is supported by a shoulder 23. Sealing ring 72 contains a central aperture 73 dimensioned to receive plug 76. When assembled, region 76′ of plug 76 projects a preselected distance within central orifice 26. Plug 76 is formed with a shoulder 77 supported by sealing ring 72. The interior of plug 76 is dimensioned to receive insert member 78. When in position, insert member 78 is supported by interior surface 77′ of shoulder 77. Top surface 79 of insert member 78 is formed with a depression 80 dimensioned to receive end 63 of male lever 62.
To attach fusible trigger assembly 60 to sprinkler head body 20, sealing assembly 70 is first positioned within outlet 27 of sprinkler body 20. Thereafter, levers 62 and 64, having fusible link 66 attached to ends 63′ and 65′ is positioned so that end 63 of male lever 62 is positioned within depression 80 of insert member 78. Threaded screw 50 is then placed within threaded bore 49 of boss 48 and rotated until threaded screw 50 contacts end 65 of female lever 64. Threaded screw 50 is rotated until a sufficient force is applied to female lever 64 to thereby hold fusible trigger assembly 60 securely in place and provide a fluid tight seal against outlet 27 of sprinkler body 20. To prevent threaded screw 50 from rotating subsequent to achieving the proper position, interior surface 51 of bore 49 is lined with an adhesive. Thereafter, a pin or pintle 85 is placed in bore 49 to thereby identify sprinkler head 10 as a non-standard orifice/thread size sprinkler. The adhesive used to secure pintle 85 within bore 49 may be any adhesive commonly used by those with ordinary skill in the art. In the preferred form, an anaerobic adhesive is utilized. Alternatively, pintle 85 may be eliminated and the necessary information stamped on an exterior surface of deflector 30.
Deflector 30 assumes a general cap-like shape and includes a horizontal top or planar member 34. A downwardly projecting annular member or skirt 36 depends from the periphery of planar member 34 in a frusto-conical configuration. Annular skirt 36 depends outwardly, away from planar member 34 at a pre-selected angle “a” off the vertical, shown in
A plurality of spaced apertures or through-holes 35 are formed along annular skirt 36. Through-holes 35 enable water to pass therethrough and in doing so, accelerates the water outwardly, away from annular skirt 36, to provide a spray distribution pattern having a larger diameter and thus a greater area of coverage. A generally horizontal annular flange or ledge 38 extends from annular skirt 36. Annular ledge 38 provides a fluid barrier to prevent water from assuming a linear trajectory and impacting the ceiling or other structure positioned above deflector 30. Planar member 34 may be flat with a substantially planar outer surface 34″. Alternatively, outer surface 34″ of planer member 34 is formed with a plurality of indentations or depressions 39. As shown in
Referring now to
Turning now to
In a preferred embodiment, as shown in
In the most preferred embodiment, each plate 164, 166 includes one or more first air apertures 178, and a second air aperture 179. Second air apertures 179 are positioned between perimeter 165 of plates 164, 166 and end 168′ of channel 168. Most preferably, second air apertures 179 have a major dimension or diameter greater than the major dimension or diameter of air apertures 178. In the most preferred embodiment, first air apertures 178 have a diameter of approximately 0.094 inches, while second air apertures 179 have a diameter of approximately 0.125 inches.
As shown in
As depicted in
An externally threaded screw 194 is positioned within threaded bore 49 of boss 48. Section 196′ of a cruciform shaped pintle 196 is positioned within threaded bore 49 of boss 48 to prevent threaded screw 194 from rotating subsequent to achieving the proper position. Cruciform shaped pintle 196 includes an annular bore 198 dimensioned to receive annular lip 52 of boss 48. Preferably, screw 194 is an Allen screw. Both screw 194 and section 196′ of cruciform shaped pintle 196 may be secured within bore 49 of boss 48 by any adhesive commonly utilized in the art.
In assembling upright sprinkler head 10′, sealing assembly 180 is positioned within the outlet 27 of sprinkler body 10′. Fusible trigger assembly 150 is assembled by inserting first pin 152 into center hole 170 defined by plates 164 and 166, with end 156′ resting within depression 186 formed in top surface 185′ of insert member 182. Thereafter, second pin 158 is positioned through center hole 170 such that the fusible link 163 rests at the intersection of middle member 162 and bottom member 161. End 156 of first pin 152 is then inserted in notch 159′″ positioned in top member 159 of second pin 158. Subsequently, screw 194 is inserted in bore 49 and rotated until end 194′ is positioned within depression 160 of top member 159 of second pin 158. Rotation of the screw 194 upon second pin 158 exerts a force, resulting in the slight upward movement of fusible link 163 and the sealing engagement of sealing assembly 180 within outlet 27. Deflector 30 is then placed over boss 48 and annular lip 52 is bent to secure deflector 30 to boss 48. Thereafter, section 196′ of cruciform shaped pintle 196 is inserted within bore 48, and held there by the use of an appropriate adhesive secured to the exterior surface of section 196′ of pintle 196 or the interior surface 51 of bore 49.
In the assembled position, fusible link 163 will be supported by first pin 152 and second pin 158 at a preselected angle off the horizontal. Furthermore, it will be recognized that the distance between the outer edges 154′ of protrusions 154 of first pin 152 is greater than the width of channels 168 of plates 164, 166 to thereby prevent movement of fusible link 163 in an upward direction. In all other aspects, upright sprinkler head 10′ is structurally similar to upright sprinkler head 10.
Upright sprinkler head 10 and 10′ is configured to have a discharge coefficient or K value of between approximately 13.5 and 14.5, and preferably, approximately 14.0 at 175 psi fluid pressure. Most preferably, outlet 27 is 0.704 inches (17.88 millimeters) in diameter. This K value, in combination with deflector 30, enables upright sprinkler head 10, 10′ to produce large, high momentum water droplets in a hemispheric pattern below deflector 30. The size and momentum of the water droplets permits penetration of the fire plume and direct wetting of the fuel package surface in order to successfully suppress or extinguish a fire.
In another aspect, the present invention is embodied in a fire sprinkler system and method for use in the protection of industrial or commercial enclosures, wherein the enclosure contains at lease one obstruction depending from, supported by, or otherwise placed a pre-selected distance below the ceiling. The fire sprinkler system and method of the present invention is particularly suited for protecting enclosures containing palletized and solid pile storage and single, double, multiple row and portable rack storage fixtures.
Turning now to
As shown in
DL≦3×W;
or
DL≦3×d0
Furthermore, upright sprinkler heads 10 or 10′ can be positioned a vertical distance or height H above the obstruction 120 which is greater than zero. That is, with the upright sprinkler head 10 or 10′ of the present invention, with the above cited parameters and commodity classifications, NFPA (1999 ed.) 13 §§ 5-11.5.2, 5-11.5.3, and 5-11.3.2 are not applicable. Specifically, the height H above the bottom of obstruction 120 at which the bottom surface of annular ledge 38 of deflector 30 is placed, depending upon the horizontal or lateral distance (dx) between upright sprinkler head 10 or 10′ and the surface of obstruction 120 most proximate to upright sprinkler head 10, 10′, is given by the table below:
When supply lines 110 each have an outer diameter of less than or equal to approximately 3.0 inches, and when enclosure 95 contains expanded plastic carton commodities, and obstruction 120, either bottom cord 128 of truss 121 or pipe 123, has a width (W) or an outer diameter (do) of approximately 3.0 inches or less, the horizontal or lateral distance (DL) between a particular upright sprinkler head 10 or 10′ and obstruction 120 is given by the equation:
DL≦3×do;
or
DL≦3×W
Furthermore, upright sprinkler heads 10 or 10′ can be positioned a height H above the obstruction 120 which is greater than zero. That is, with the upright sprinkler head 10 or 10′ of the present invention, with the above cited parameters, and commodity classifications, NFPA 13 (1996 ed.) § 4-11.5.2 and NFPA 13 (1999 ed.) §§ 5-11.5.2, 5-11.5.3, 5-11.5.3.2 are not applicable. Specifically, the height H above the bottom of obstruction 120 at which the bottom surface of annular ledge 38 of deflector 30 is placed, depending upon the horizontal or lateral distance (dx) between upright sprinkler head 10, 10′ and the surface of obstruction 120 most proximate to upright sprinkler head 10, 10′, is given by the table cited above.
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the combination of the K factor and the initial upward trajectory of the fire extinguishing fluid, as well as the configuration of deflector 30, enables upright sprinkler head 10 or 10′ to deliver an effective spray distribution pattern about and around obstructions having the dimensions as detailed above. The ability to place upright sprinkler head 10 or 10′ in proximity to an obstruction 120 permits the fire sprinkler system to effectively suppress a fire ignited directly below, or approximately directly below, obstruction 120. Furthermore, by providing greater fire suppression coverage in the area below the obstruction, a lesser number of upright sprinkler heads 10 or 10′ are actuated in response to the fire and thus minimizes unnecessary water usage and the resultant damage to product. Moreover, by eliminating the need to place sprinklers a minimum distance from these obstructions, and at the horizontal plane defined by the bottom of the obstruction, the design and installation of fire sprinkler systems in these facilities is simplified.
In a fire sprinkler system test conducted by the Factory Mutual Research Corporation utilizing an array of upright sprinkler heads according to the present invention, and obstructed by a particular bar joist configuration, the upright sprinkler head of the present invention exhibited fire suppression performance for the FMRC standard plastic commodity.
The test was conducted under a 30 foot high ceiling, having depending therefrom a bar joist having a bottom cord approximately four inches in width. Both the ignition location (i.e., the area in which the fire was ignited) and the bar joist were positioned directly under a single upright sprinkler head of the sprinkler head array. The fluid supply line responsible for transporting fluid to the upright sprinkler head located above the ignition location was positioned perpendicular to the bar joist, while its bottom cord was positioned immediately beneath the supply pipe. The commodity tested was FMRC standard plastic commodity. The commodities were stacked in storage arrays having a height of approximately 19.6 feet. The upright sprinkler head positioned over the ignition location was centered to provide a V-shaped clearance between a pair of approximately ¾ inch diameter bar joist connecting rods, such that the distance from the deflector of the upright sprinkler head to either rod was approximately three inches. A summary of the test procedures and results may be seen in
Using the parameters discussed above and detailed in
It is to be understood that the foregoing is a description of the preferred embodiments only. One skilled in the art will recognize that variations, modifications and improvements may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention disclosed herein. The scope of protection is to be measured by the claims which follow and the breath of interpretation which the law allows, including the doctrine of equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/435,845, filed May 12, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,036,603, entitled FAST RESPONSE SPRINKLER HEAD AND FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM, by Applicants Peter W. Thomas, et al., which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/579,552, filed May 26, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,585,054, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Pat. Application Ser. No. 60/136,498, filed May 28, 1999, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
447004 | Nagle | Feb 1891 | A |
1017715 | Voigtmann | Feb 1912 | A |
1021329 | Poppendieck | Mar 1912 | A |
1030299 | Hammond | Jun 1912 | A |
1093063 | Meloon | Apr 1914 | A |
1116518 | Voigtmann | Nov 1914 | A |
1177182 | Hammond | Mar 1916 | A |
1294260 | Hall | Feb 1919 | A |
1381551 | Hartley | Jun 1921 | A |
1919235 | Loepsinger | Jul 1933 | A |
2075816 | Loepsinger et al. | Apr 1937 | A |
2151982 | Loepsinger et al. | Mar 1939 | A |
2724614 | Rider | Nov 1955 | A |
3525402 | Hattori | Aug 1970 | A |
3590924 | Emmons et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3638734 | Grimshaw | Feb 1972 | A |
3682251 | Livingston | Aug 1972 | A |
3698482 | Livingston | Oct 1972 | A |
3722596 | Livingston | Mar 1973 | A |
3743022 | Linvingston | Jul 1973 | A |
3768736 | Cox | Oct 1973 | A |
3770663 | Ault Juliano | Nov 1973 | A |
3866686 | Goodsell, Jr. et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3874455 | Klesow | Apr 1975 | A |
3888313 | Freeman | Jun 1975 | A |
3893513 | Marsh | Jul 1975 | A |
3904126 | Allard | Sep 1975 | A |
4091873 | Werner | May 1978 | A |
4099675 | Wohler et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4113021 | Weiner | Sep 1978 | A |
4121665 | Woycheese | Oct 1978 | A |
4136740 | Groos et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
D251128 | Groos et al. | Feb 1979 | S |
4176718 | Vorkapich | Dec 1979 | A |
4273195 | Fischer et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4279309 | Fischer et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4405018 | Fischer | Sep 1983 | A |
4440234 | Shea | Apr 1984 | A |
4580729 | Pounder | Apr 1986 | A |
4657085 | Jacobsen | Apr 1987 | A |
4699217 | McLennan et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4757865 | Simons | Jul 1988 | A |
4800961 | Klein | Jan 1989 | A |
4901799 | Pepi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4930578 | Barnett et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4991656 | Polan | Feb 1991 | A |
5036923 | Shea, Sr. | Aug 1991 | A |
5094298 | Polan | Mar 1992 | A |
5366022 | Meyer et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5579846 | Meyer et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584344 | Meyer et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5609211 | Meyer et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5664630 | Meyer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5829532 | Meyer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5829684 | Fischer | Nov 1998 | A |
5862994 | Pounder et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5915479 | Ponte | Jun 1999 | A |
6152236 | Retzloff et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6502643 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6585054 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
7036603 | Thomas et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050224238 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60136498 | May 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09579552 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10435845 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10435845 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 11145390 | US |