All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates generally to orthopedic medicine and surgery. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for delivery and fixation of sheet-like materials, such as for treating tendons or like tissue of articulating joints such as tendons in the rotator cuff of the shoulder.
The glenohumeral joint of the shoulder is found where the head of the humerus mates with a shallow depression in the scapula. This shallow depression is known as the glenoid fossa. Six muscles extend between the humerus and scapula and actuate the glenohumeral joint. These six muscles include the deltoid, the teres major, and the four rotator cuff muscles. The rotator cuff muscles are a complex of muscles. The muscles of the rotator cuff include the supraspinatus, the infraspinatus, the subscapularis, and the teres minor. The centering and stabilizing roles played by the rotator cuff muscles are critical to the proper function of the shoulder. The rotator cuff muscles provide a wide variety of moments to rotate the humerus and to oppose unwanted components of the deltoid and pectoral muscle forces.
The muscles of the rotator cuff arise from the scapula. The distal tendons of the rotator cuff muscles splay out and interdigitate to form a common continuous insertion on the humerus. The supraspinatus muscle arises from the supraspinatus fossa of the posterior scapula, passes beneath the acromion and the acromioclavicular joint, and attaches to the superior aspect of the greater tuberosity. The mechanics of the rotator cuff muscles are complex. The rotator cuff muscles rotate the humerus with respect to the scapula, compress the humeral head into the glenoid fossa providing a critical stabilizing mechanism to the shoulder (known as concavity compression), and provide muscular balance. The supraspinatus and deltoid muscles are equally responsible for producing torque about the shoulder joint in the functional planes of motion.
The rotator cuff muscles are critical elements of this shoulder muscle balance equation. The human shoulder has no fixed axis. In a specified position, activation of a muscle creates a unique set of rotational moments. For example, the anterior deltoid can exert moments in forward elevation, internal rotation, and cross-body movement. If forward elevation is to occur without rotation, the cross-body and internal rotation moments of this muscle must be neutralized by other muscles, such as the posterior deltoid and infraspinatus. The timing and magnitude of these balancing muscle effects must be precisely coordinated to avoid unwanted directions of humeral motion. Thus the simplified view of muscles as isolated motors, or as members of force couples must give way to an understanding that all shoulder muscles function together in a precisely coordinated way—opposing muscles canceling out undesired elements leaving only the net torque necessary to produce the desired action. Injury to any of these soft tissues can greatly inhibit ranges and types of motion of the arm.
With its complexity, range of motion and extensive use, a common soft tissue injury is damage to the rotator cuff or rotator cuff tendons. Damage to the rotator cuff is a potentially serious medical condition that may occur during hyperextension, from an acute traumatic tear or from overuse of the joint. With its critical role in abduction, rotational strength and torque production, the most common injury associated with the rotator cuff region is a strain or tear involving the supraspinatus tendon. A tear at the insertion site of the tendon with the humerus, may result in the detachment of the tendon from the bone. This detachment may be partial or full, depending upon the severity of the injury or damage. Additionally, the strain or tear can occur within the tendon itself. Injuries to the supraspinatus tendon and current modalities for treatment are defined by the type and degree of tear. The first type of tear is a full thickness tear, which as the term indicates is a tear that extends through the thickness of the supraspinatus tendon regardless of whether it is completely torn laterally. The second type of tear is a partial thickness tear which is further classified based on how much of the thickness is torn, whether it is greater or less than about 50% of the thickness.
The accepted treatment for a full thickness tear or a partial thickness tear greater than 50% includes reconnecting the torn tendon via sutures. For the partial thickness tears greater than 50%, the tear is completed to a full thickness tear by cutting the tendon prior to reconnection. In contrast to the treatment of a full thickness tear or a partial thickness tear of greater than 50%, the current standard treatment for a partial thickness tear less than 50% usually involves physical cessation from use of the tendon, i.e., rest. Specific exercises can also be prescribed to strengthen and loosen the shoulder area. In many instances, the shoulder does not heal and the partial thickness tear can be the source of chronic pain and stiffness. Further, the pain and stiffness may cause restricted use of the limb which tends to result in further degeneration or atrophy in the shoulder. Surgical intervention may be required for a partial thickness tear of less than 50%, however, current treatment interventions do not include repair of the tendon, and rather the surgical procedure is directed to arthroscopic removal of bone to relieve points of impingement or create a larger tunnel between the tendon and bone that is believed to be causing tendon damage. As part of the treatment, degenerated tendon may also be removed using a debridement procedure in which tendon material is ablated. Again, the tendon partial thickness tear is not repaired. Several authors have reported satisfactory early post operative results from these procedures, but over time recurrent symptoms have been noted. In the event of recurrent symptoms, many times a patient will “live with the pain”. This may result in less use of the arm and shoulder which causes further degeneration of the tendon and may lead to more extensive damage. A tendon repair would then need to be done in a later procedure if the prescribed treatment for the partial tear was unsuccessful in relieving pain and stiffness or over time the tear propagated through injury or degeneration to a full thickness tear or a partial thickness tear greater than 50% with attendant pain and debilitation. A subsequent later procedure would include the more drastic procedure of completing the tear to full thickness and suturing the ends of the tendon back together. This procedure requires extensive rehabilitation, has relatively high failure rates and subjects the patient who first presented and was treated with a partial thickness tear less than 50% to a second surgical procedure.
As described above, adequate treatments do not currently exist for repairing a partial thickness tear of less than 50% in the supraspinatus tendon. Current procedures attempt to alleviate impingement or make room for movement of the tendon to prevent further damage and relieve discomfort but do not repair or strengthen the tendon. Use of the still damaged tendon can lead to further damage or injury. Prior damage may result in degeneration that requires a second more drastic procedure to repair the tendon. Further, if the prior procedure was only partially successful in relieving pain and discomfort, a response may be to use the shoulder less which leads to degeneration and increased likelihood of further injury along with the need for more drastic surgery. Further, it would be beneficial to be able to treat partial thickness tears greater than 50% without cutting the untorn portion of the tendon to complete the tear before suturing back together. There is a large need for surgical techniques and systems to treat partial thickness tears and prevent future tendon damage by strengthening or repairing the native tendon having the partial thickness tear.
The present disclosure is generally directed to a fastener or staple that can be used to attach an implant to bone or other tissue. The staple or fastener can be included in a kit or system that also can include a staple delivery device and a pilot hole forming trocar assembly. The trocar assembly is used to create pilot holes and retain instrument position within those pilot holes for staple insertion. The staple delivery device can carry the staple into the pilot holes and release the staple in engagement with bone to retain the implant in position.
The staple for insertion and retention in bone can include a bridge portion having arms extending from proximate each end thereof, at least a portion of each arm including tissue retention members, each tissue retention member having at least two barbed projections extending laterally therefrom. Each arm can have a cross sectional area of reduced strength proximate each projection relative to other portions of the tissue retention member such that a portion of the tissue retention member flexes laterally proximate each projection in response to a pullout force applied to the bridge. The tissue retention members can include a trunk of greater cross sectional area than a non-trunk portion of the arms.
The fastener or staple can also include, in alternative embodiments, a first arm having a proximal end and a distal end, a second arm having a proximal end and a distal end, and a bridge connecting the first arm and second arm, wherein each of the first and second arms include a trunk portion extending over at least a portion of the length thereof. Each trunk can have a lateral extent larger than a lateral extent of the bridge or non-trunk arm portion adjacent thereto such that the staple includes a first change in lateral stiffness disposed proximate the bridge or non-trunk arm portion abutment with the first trunk and a second change in lateral stiffness disposed proximate the bridge or non-trunk arm portion abutment with the second trunk. The lateral extent of each trunk in at least one direction can be at least about three times the lateral extent of at least a portion of the bridge or non-trunk portion of the arm.
Each trunk can further include a first projection and a second projection, the first projection including a first proximal surface extending away from the trunk in a first direction, the first direction being such that the first proximal surface will engage the tissue or bone when the trunk is inserted therein so that a first moment is applied to the trunk in response to a pullout force on the bridge. Likewise, the second projection can include a second proximal surface extending away from the trunk in a second direction, the second direction being such that the second proximal surface will engage the tissue or bone when the trunk is inserted therein so that a second moment is applied to the trunk in response to a pullout force on the bridge. Each of the trunks can further include a localized area of weakness proximate the second projection thereon. For example, a second area of reduced strength can include a slit in the cross section of the tissue retention member or trunk adjacent at least one of the projections therefrom. Further, reduced strength can be created where the trunk meets the non-trunk portion of the arm adjacent thereto or the bridge.
In some embodiments, the change in lateral stiffness and the localized area of weakness allow flexing of each arm portion in response to the first and second moment, respectively.
The projections can be arranged to extend in first and second directions to achieve increased pullout strength. The first direction can extend proximally and laterally away from each trunk while the second direction can extend proximally and laterally away from each trunk and a lateral component of the second direction is generally opposite a lateral component of the first direction. The forces on the projections create moments about the more flexible portions of the staple where the direction of the first moment is generally opposite the direction of the second moment on each arm.
In some embodiments, the fastener first trunk and the second trunk each define a cavity, each cavity being spaced laterally from the respective non-trunk portion or bridge adjacent thereto. Each cavity defined by the first and the second trunk is sized to receive a first stake and a second stake, respectively, of a fastener delivery device. Each cavity defined by the first and the second trunk can extend from the proximal end to the distal end of the trunk.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings in which similar elements in different drawings are numbered the same. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict illustrative embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Staple 100 comprises a first arm 102A, a second arm 102B, and a bridge 104 extending from, abutting or adjacent to the proximal end of first arm 102A to the proximal end of second arm 102B. The first arm 102A includes a first trunk 106A extending for at a least a portion of the length of the first arm 102A. As depicted in
In the embodiment of
Each of the first trunk 106A and second trunk 106B can include at least a first projection 122A, 122C and a second projection 122B, 122D, the first projection 122A, 122C on each trunk 106A, 106B includes a first proximal surface 124A, 124C extending away from the trunk in a first direction, the first direction being such that the first proximal surface 124A, 124C will engage the tissue or bone after the trunk is inserted therein and a pullout force is applied to the bridge 104. This force creates a first moment centered on the area of reduced lateral extent adjacent the trunk, tending to rotate the trunk thereabout, further providing a greater holding force in response to the pullout force as the trunk presses against the tissue or bone. The second projection 122B, 122D includes a second proximal surface 124B, 124D extending away from the trunk in a second direction, different from the first direction, the second direction being such that the second proximal surfaces 124B, 124D will engage the tissue or bone after the trunk is inserted therein and a pullout force is applied to the bridge 104. A slit or area of reduced cross section in the trunk adjacent the second projections provide an area of weakness so that a second moment is applied to the trunk in response to a pullout force on the bridge 104. This moment causes rotation of the trunk about the area of weakness and increases the holding force with increased pullout force.
As specifically illustrated in the embodiment of staple or fastener 100 in
In the embodiment of
Second trunk 106B includes a third projection 122C disposed at an outer side of second trunk 106B and a fourth projection 122D disposed at an inner side of the trunk. In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
As depicted in
In some useful embodiments, each projection of staple 100 may be clefted to form a plurality of points for greater retention in tissue. In the exemplary embodiment of
With continued reference to
In the embodiment of
As earlier described the configuration of the four projections 122A, 122B, 122C and 122D, contact the tissue or bone and provide a holding force upon implantation. Each projection is positioned to provide a force moment in a desired direction to the trunk in response to the pullout force on the bridge 104.
In the embodiment of
The combination of projections, areas of weakness and changes in lateral extent provide desired flexing, bending and rotating of the trunk in response to pull out forces once implanted in a bone, such as in a pilot hole formed in the bone. Together these components act as tissue retention members. An exemplary deflected shape is shown with dashed lines in
Next referring to
With reference to
The exemplary staples or fasteners described herein may be used to affix tendon repair implants to various target tissues. The shoulder depicted in
As depicted in
With reference to
In
First cannula 80A is accessing a treatment site within shoulder 22 using a lateral approach in which first cannula 80A pierces the outer surface of right side 84 of body 82. The term lateral approach could also be used to describe situations in which an instrument pierces the outer surface of left side 86 of body 82. Second cannula 80B is accessing a treatment site within shoulder 22 using a posterior approach in which second cannula 80B pierces the outer surface of posterior portion 88 of body 82. Third cannula 80C is accessing a treatment site within shoulder 22 using an anterior approach in which third cannula 80C pierces the outer surface of anterior portion 92 of body 82.
Shoulder 22 of
Camera 56 may be used to visually inspect the tendons of shoulder 22 for damage. A tendon repair implant in accordance with this disclosure may be affixed to a bursal surface of the tendon regardless of whether there are visible signs of tendon damage. Applicants believe that the methods and apparatus of the present application and related devices may provide very beneficial therapeutic effect on a patient experiencing joint pain believed to be caused by internal microtears, but having no clear signs of tendon tears. By applying a tendon repair implant early before a full tear or other injury develops, the implant may cause the tendon to thicken and/or at least partially repair itself, thereby avoiding more extensive joint damage, pain, and the need for more extensive joint repair surgery.
An implant delivery system 60 can be seen extending from shoulder 22 in
A tendon repair implant is at least partially disposed in the lumen defined by the sheath of implant delivery system 60. Implant delivery system 60 can be used to place the tendon repair implant inside shoulder 22. In some embodiments, the tendon repair implant is folded into a compact configuration when inside the lumen of the sheath. When this is the case, implant delivery system 60 may be used to unfold the tendon repair implant into an expanded shape. Additionally, implant delivery system 60 can be used to hold the tendon repair implant against the tendon.
The tendon repair implant may be affixed to the tendon while it is held against the tendon by implant delivery system 60. Various attachment elements may be used to fix the tendon-repair implant to the tendon. Examples of attachment elements that may be suitable in some applications include sutures, tissue anchors, bone anchors, and staples. In the exemplary embodiment of
Various attachment elements may be used to fix tendon repair implant 50 to distal tendon 28 without deviating from the spirit and scope of this detailed description. Examples of attachment elements that may be suitable in some applications include sutures, tissue anchors, bone anchors, and staples. In the embodiment of
In some exemplary methods, a plurality of staples may be applied using a fixation tool. After the staples are applied, the fixation tool may be withdrawn from the body of the patient. Distal tendon 28 meets humerus 14 at an insertion point 30. With reference to
Staples or fasteners 100, as exemplified in
In general, the staple delivery device 200 can include a handle assembly 201 and a barrel assembly 205. The handle assembly 201 includes a trigger 203 that is operatively coupled to mechanisms in the barrel assembly 205 to deploy a staple of the present disclosure in bone. The staple delivery device 200 can be used in conjunction with the pilot hole forming trocar assembly 300 of
The pilot hole forming trocar assembly 300, illustrated generally in
Referring to
As previously stated, a pilot hole forming trocar assembly 300 can include a trocar 302 and a position retention sleeve 304. One embodiment of a position retention sleeve 304 is illustrated in
Position retention members 314 extend distally from the shaft 311. As detailed in
A more detailed depiction of one alternative embodiment of a trocar 302 is included in
As previously disclosed, the distal end of the trocar 302 includes two pilot hole forming spikes 308 extending from shaft 320. A retractable blade 306 is positioned between the spikes 308. In use, the blade 306 is retracted prior to the spikes 308 being used to form pilot holes in bone.
Now referring to
The operation of some embodiments of the staple delivery device 200 is further understood with reference to
When staple delivery device 200 is in an assembled state, staple 100 may be carried by a first stake 238A and a second stake 238B of fork 232. As previously described with respect to
Now referring to
The components of a staple delivery assembly 252 are illustrated in
In
In
As depicted in the prior drawings, the manner in which a staple 100, a first staple setting rod 234A and a second staple setting rod 234B engage fork 232 allows placement of the staple with active engagement and retention in the tissue or bone. Each staple setting rod 234 is disposed in sliding engagement with fork 232. A distal end of each staple setting rod 234 is disposed near a staple 100 that is carried by fork 232.
Staple 100 is designed to cooperatively engage the fork and staple setting rods when mounted thereon for placement in bone. As previously described, the staple 100 can include a first arm 102A, a second arm 102B, and a bridge 104 extending from the proximal end of first arm 102A to the proximal end of second arm 102B. At least the distal portion of first arm 102A is a trunk that abuts a non-trunk portion of first arm 102A or the bridge 104. The same is true of second arm 102B. First trunk 106A and second trunk 106B define a first cavity 128A and a second cavity 128B, respectively.
Fork 132 includes a first stake 238A and a second stake 238B. A distal portion 244A of first stake 238A of fork 232 can be seen extending into first cavity 128A defined by first trunk 106A of staple 100. A distal portion 244B of second stake 238B of fork 232 extends into second cavity 128B defined by second trunk 106B of staple 100.
The proximal portion of each stake 238 has a generally dovetail-shaped lateral cross-section. Proximal portion 246A of first stake 238A is slidingly received in a dovetail-shaped slot defined by first staple setting rod 234A. Similarly, proximal portion 246B of second stake 238B is slidingly received in a dovetail-shaped slot defined by second staple setting rod 234B. Accordingly, each staple setting rod is coupled to fork 232 with a single degree of freedom for relative movement such that the staple setting rod can slide in distal and proximal directions relative to the fork.
The staple setting rods 234 may be moved so that the distal end of each staple setting rod abuts a proximal surface of staple 100. Each staple setting rod may apply pushing forces to one or more proximal surfaces of staple 100. Forces applied by the staple setting rods may be used to urge first projection 122A and third projection 122C into orientations that lock staple 100 into a target tissue. For example, first projection 122A and third projection 122C may be rotated so that these projections engage the target tissue. When this is the case, tension extending through bridge 104 of staple 100 may keep first projection 122A and third projection 122C in the rotated position in which the projections inhibit staple pullout.
As assembled, the distal end of the staple delivery assembly 252 is enclosed by the end of the sheath 250. Initial movement of the trigger causes the stable delivery assembly to extend beyond the distal end of the sheath 150 which inserts the staple 100 into pilot holes in the bone. Continue movement of the trigger then forces the staple setting rods distally to set the staples in engagement with the bone.
The process of forming pilot holes and delivery staples of the present disclosure to bone is described with respect to
Referring to
While exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, modifications may be made, and it is therefore intended in the appended claims and subsequently filed claims to cover all such changes and modifications which fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/717,493 filed on Dec. 17, 2012, entitled “FASTENERS AND FASTENER DELIVERY DEVICES FOR AFFIXING SHEET-LIKE MATERIALS TO BONE OR TISSUE”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/577,626 filed on Dec. 19, 2011, the disclosures of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. The present disclosure is related to the following commonly assigned applications, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/577,621 filed on Dec. 19, 2011, entitled, “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR FORMING PILOT HOLES IN BONE AND DELIVERING FASTENERS THEREIN FOR RETAINING AN IMPLANT”; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/577,632 filed on Dec. 19, 2011, entitled, “FASTENERS AND FASTENER DELIVERY DEVICES FOR AFFIXING SHEET-LIKE MATERIALS TO BONE OR TISSUE” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/577,635 filed on Dec. 19, 2011, entitled, “FASTENERS AND FASTENER DELIVERY DEVICES FOR AFFIXING SHEET-LIKE MATERIALS TO BONE OR TISSUE.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
511238 | Hieatzman et al. | Dec 1893 | A |
765793 | Ruckel | Jul 1904 | A |
1728316 | von Wachenfeldt et al. | Sep 1929 | A |
1855546 | File | Apr 1932 | A |
1868100 | Goodstein | Jul 1932 | A |
1910688 | Goodstein | May 1933 | A |
1940351 | Howard | Dec 1933 | A |
2034785 | Wappler | Mar 1936 | A |
2075508 | Davidson | Mar 1937 | A |
2131321 | Hart | Sep 1938 | A |
2158242 | Maynard | May 1939 | A |
2199025 | Conn | Apr 1940 | A |
2201610 | Dawson, Jr. | May 1940 | A |
2254620 | Miller | Sep 1941 | A |
2277931 | Moe | Mar 1942 | A |
2283814 | La Place | May 1942 | A |
2316297 | Southerland et al. | Apr 1943 | A |
2421193 | Gardner | May 1947 | A |
2571813 | Austin | Oct 1951 | A |
2630316 | Foster | Mar 1953 | A |
2684070 | Kelsey | Jul 1954 | A |
2744251 | Vollmer | May 1956 | A |
2790341 | Keep et al. | Apr 1957 | A |
2817339 | Sullivan | Dec 1957 | A |
2825162 | Flood | Mar 1958 | A |
2881762 | Lowrie | Apr 1959 | A |
2910067 | White | Oct 1959 | A |
3068870 | Levin | Dec 1962 | A |
3077812 | Dietrich | Feb 1963 | A |
3103666 | Bone | Sep 1963 | A |
3123077 | Alcamo | Mar 1964 | A |
3209754 | Brown | Oct 1965 | A |
3221746 | Noble | Dec 1965 | A |
3470834 | Bone | Oct 1969 | A |
3527223 | Shein | Sep 1970 | A |
3570497 | Lemole | Mar 1971 | A |
3577837 | Bader, Jr. | May 1971 | A |
3579831 | Stevens et al. | May 1971 | A |
3643851 | Green et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3687138 | Jarvik | Aug 1972 | A |
3716058 | Tanner, Jr. | Feb 1973 | A |
3717294 | Green | Feb 1973 | A |
3757629 | Schneider | Sep 1973 | A |
3777538 | Weatherly et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3837555 | Green | Sep 1974 | A |
3845772 | Smith | Nov 1974 | A |
3875648 | Bone | Apr 1975 | A |
3960147 | Murray | Jun 1976 | A |
3976079 | Samuels et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4014492 | Rothfuss | Mar 1977 | A |
4127227 | Green | Nov 1978 | A |
4259959 | Walker | Apr 1981 | A |
4263903 | Griggs | Apr 1981 | A |
4265226 | Cassimally | May 1981 | A |
4317451 | Cerwin et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4400833 | Kurland | Aug 1983 | A |
4422567 | Haynes | Dec 1983 | A |
4454875 | Pratt et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4480641 | Failla et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4485816 | Krumme | Dec 1984 | A |
4526174 | Froehlich | Jul 1985 | A |
4549545 | Levy | Oct 1985 | A |
4570623 | Ellison et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4595007 | Mericle | Jun 1986 | A |
4624254 | McGarry et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4627437 | Bedi et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635637 | Schreiber | Jan 1987 | A |
4669473 | Richards et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4696300 | Anderson | Sep 1987 | A |
4719917 | Barrows et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738255 | Goble et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4741330 | Hayhurst | May 1988 | A |
4762260 | Richards et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4799495 | Hawkins et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4809695 | Gwathmey et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4851005 | Hunt et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4858608 | McQuilkin | Aug 1989 | A |
4884572 | Bays et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4887601 | Richards | Dec 1989 | A |
4924866 | Yoon | May 1990 | A |
4930674 | Barak | Jun 1990 | A |
4968315 | Gatturna | Nov 1990 | A |
4976715 | Bays et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4994073 | Green | Feb 1991 | A |
4997436 | Oberlander | Mar 1991 | A |
5002563 | Pyka et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5015249 | Nakao et al. | May 1991 | A |
5037422 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5041129 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5046513 | Gatturna et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053047 | Yoon | Oct 1991 | A |
5059206 | Winters | Oct 1991 | A |
5062563 | Green et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5100417 | Cerier et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5102421 | Anspach, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116357 | Eberbach | May 1992 | A |
5122155 | Eberbach | Jun 1992 | A |
5123913 | Wilk et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
RE34021 | Mueller et al. | Aug 1992 | E |
5141515 | Eberbach | Aug 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5156609 | Nakao et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156616 | Meadows et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167665 | McKinney | Dec 1992 | A |
5171259 | Inoue | Dec 1992 | A |
5174295 | Christian et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174487 | Rothfuss et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176682 | Chow | Jan 1993 | A |
5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5203787 | Noblitt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217472 | Green et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5224946 | Hayhurst et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5242457 | Akopov et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246441 | Ross et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251642 | Handlos | Oct 1993 | A |
5261914 | Warren | Nov 1993 | A |
5269753 | Wilk | Dec 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5282829 | Hermes | Feb 1994 | A |
5289963 | McGarry et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290217 | Campos | Mar 1994 | A |
5304187 | Green et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5333624 | Tovey | Aug 1994 | A |
5342396 | Cook | Aug 1994 | A |
5350400 | Esposito et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352229 | Goble et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354292 | Braeuer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364408 | Gordon | Nov 1994 | A |
5366460 | Eberbach | Nov 1994 | A |
5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372604 | Trott | Dec 1994 | A |
5380334 | Torrie et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383477 | Dematteis | Jan 1995 | A |
5397332 | Kammerer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403326 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405360 | Tovey | Apr 1995 | A |
5411522 | Trott | May 1995 | A |
5411523 | Goble | May 1995 | A |
5417691 | Hayhurst | May 1995 | A |
5417712 | Whittaker et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425490 | Goble et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5441502 | Bartlett | Aug 1995 | A |
5441508 | Gazielly et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456720 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464403 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5478354 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486197 | Le et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497933 | DeFonzo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500000 | Feagin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501695 | Anspach, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503623 | Tilton, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5505735 | Li | Apr 1996 | A |
5507754 | Green et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522817 | Sander et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545180 | Le et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560532 | Defonzo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569306 | Thal | Oct 1996 | A |
5582616 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584835 | Greenfield | Dec 1996 | A |
5618314 | Harwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5622257 | Deschenes et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628751 | Sander et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643319 | Green et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5643321 | McDevitt | Jul 1997 | A |
5647874 | Hayhurst | Jul 1997 | A |
5649963 | McDevitt | Jul 1997 | A |
5662683 | Kay | Sep 1997 | A |
5667513 | Torrie et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674245 | Ilgen | Oct 1997 | A |
5681342 | Benchetrit | Oct 1997 | A |
5702215 | Li | Dec 1997 | A |
5713903 | Sander et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720753 | Sander et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766246 | Mulhauser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782864 | Lizardi | Jul 1998 | A |
5797909 | Michelson | Aug 1998 | A |
5797931 | Bito et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797963 | McDevitt | Aug 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830221 | Stein et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836961 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5868762 | Cragg et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873891 | Sohn | Feb 1999 | A |
5885258 | Sachdeva et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885294 | Pedlick et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893856 | Jacob et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904696 | Rosenman | May 1999 | A |
5919184 | Tilton, Jr. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5928244 | Tovey et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948000 | Larsen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957939 | Heaven et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957953 | DiPoto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968044 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980557 | Iserin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989265 | Bouquet De La Joliniere et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997552 | Person et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6063088 | Winslow | May 2000 | A |
6156045 | Ulbrich et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179840 | Bowman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193731 | Oppelt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193733 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6245072 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302885 | Essiger | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312442 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315789 | Cragg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318616 | Pasqualucci et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322563 | Cummings et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325805 | Ogilvie et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6387113 | Hawkins et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391333 | Li et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413274 | Pedros | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425900 | Knodel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436110 | Bowman et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6447522 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6447524 | Knodel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478803 | Kapec et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482178 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482210 | Skiba et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511499 | Schmieding et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517564 | Grafton et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524316 | Nicholson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527795 | Lizardi | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530933 | Yeung et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540769 | Miller, III | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551333 | Kuhns et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554852 | Oberlander | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569186 | Winters et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575976 | Grafton | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6599289 | Bojarski et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6620185 | Harvie et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629988 | Weadock | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638297 | Huitema | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648893 | Dudasik | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666872 | Barreiro et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673094 | McDevitt et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6685728 | Sinnott et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692506 | Ory et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6723099 | Goshert | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726704 | Loshakove et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726705 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740100 | Demopulos et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746472 | Frazier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764500 | Van De Moer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770073 | McDevitt et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6779701 | Bailly et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800081 | Parodi | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6835206 | Jackson | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849078 | Durgin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887259 | Lizardi | May 2005 | B2 |
6926723 | Mulhauser et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6932834 | Lizardi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939365 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6946003 | Wolowacz et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949117 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964685 | Murray et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966916 | Kumar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972027 | Fallin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984241 | Lubbers et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991597 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008435 | Cummins | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7021316 | Leiboff | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025772 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033379 | Peterson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037324 | Martinek | May 2006 | B2 |
7048171 | Thornton et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7063711 | Loshakove et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7083638 | Foerster | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087064 | Hyde | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7112214 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118581 | Fridén | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144413 | Wilford et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7144414 | Harvie et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150750 | Damarati | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153314 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160314 | Sgro et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160326 | Ball | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163551 | Anthony et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163563 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169157 | Kayan | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189251 | Kay | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201754 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214232 | Bowman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7226469 | Benavitz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229452 | Kayan | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247164 | Ritchart et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7303577 | Dean | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7309337 | Colleran et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7320692 | Bender et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7320701 | Haut et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322935 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326231 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343920 | Toby et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7368124 | Chun et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377934 | Lin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7381213 | Lizardi | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390329 | Westra et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399304 | Gambale et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404824 | Webler et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7416554 | Lam et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7452368 | Liberatore et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460913 | Kuzma et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463933 | Wahlstrom et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7465308 | Sikora et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481832 | Meridew et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7485124 | Kuhns et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497854 | Gill et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500972 | Voegele et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500980 | Gill et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7500983 | Kaiser et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7503474 | Hillstead et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506791 | Omaits et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7559941 | Zannis et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7572276 | Lim et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7585311 | Green et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7766208 | Epperly et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771440 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7776057 | Laufer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780685 | Hunt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785255 | Malkani | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7807192 | Li et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819880 | Zannis et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7918879 | Yeung et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8114101 | Criscuolo et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8197837 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020077687 | Ahn | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090725 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123767 | Prestel | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165559 | Grant et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030073979 | Naimark et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125748 | Li et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030212456 | Lipchitz et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040059416 | Murray et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040138705 | Heino et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167519 | Weiner et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050015021 | Shiber | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049618 | Masuda et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051597 | Toledano | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059996 | Bauman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060033 | Vacanti et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107807 | Nakao | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113736 | Orr et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171569 | Girard et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187576 | Whitman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050240222 | Shipp | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050274768 | Cummins et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060074423 | Alleyne et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060178743 | Carter | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235442 | Huitema | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060293760 | Dedeyne | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070078477 | Heneveld, Sr. et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083236 | Sikora et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112361 | Schonholz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070179531 | Thornes | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185506 | Jackson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190108 | Datta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219558 | Deutsch | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070270804 | Chudik | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288023 | Pellegrino et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027470 | Hart et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051888 | Ratcliffe et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065153 | Allard et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080090936 | Fujimura et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080125869 | Paz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135600 | Hiranuma et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173691 | Mas et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188874 | Henderson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188936 | Ball et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195119 | Ferree | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200949 | Hiles et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080241213 | Chun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272173 | Coleman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306408 | Lo | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001122 | Prommersberger et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012521 | Axelson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030434 | Paz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090069806 | De La Mora Levy et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076541 | Chin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105535 | Green et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112085 | Eby | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134198 | Knodel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156986 | Trenhaile | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156997 | Trenhaile | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182245 | Zambelli | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090242609 | Kanner | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100145367 | Ratcliffe | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147922 | Olson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100163598 | Belzer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191332 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241227 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249801 | Sengun et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256675 | Romans | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274278 | Fleenor et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292715 | Nering et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292791 | Lu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312250 | Euteneuer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312275 | Euteneuer | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100327042 | Amid et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000950 | Euteneuer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110004221 | Euteneuer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110011917 | Loulmet | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110034942 | Levin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040310 | Levin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040311 | Levin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066166 | Levin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106154 | DiMatteo et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110114700 | Baxter, III et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110224702 | Van Kampen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264149 | Pappalardo et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120100200 | Belcheva et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120160893 | Harris et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120193391 | Michler et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209401 | Euteneuer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211543 | Euteneuer | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120248171 | Bailly et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120316608 | Foley | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130153627 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130153628 | Euteneuer | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158554 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158587 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158661 | Euteneuer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172920 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172997 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184716 | Euteneuer et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2390508 | May 2001 | CA |
0142225 | May 1985 | EP |
0298400 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0390613 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0543499 | May 1993 | EP |
0548998 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0557963 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0589306 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0908152 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1491157 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1559379 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2030576 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2154688 | Sep 1985 | GB |
2397240 | Jul 2004 | GB |
58-188442 | Nov 1983 | JP |
2005506122 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2006515774 | Jun 2006 | JP |
WO 8505025 | Nov 1985 | WO |
WO 0176456 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0234140 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 03105670 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 04000138 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004093690 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005016389 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006086679 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007014910 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007030676 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007078978 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007082088 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2008111073 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008111078 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008139473 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009079211 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009143331 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2011095890 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011128903 | Oct 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alexander et al.; Ligament and tendon repair with an absorbable polymer-coated carbon fiber stent; Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute; vol. 46; No. 2; pp. 155-173; Fall 1986. |
Bahler et al.; Trabecular bypass stents decrease intraocular pressure in cultured himan anterior segments; Am. J. Opthalmology; vol. 138; No. 6; pp. 988-994; Dec. 2004. |
Chamay et al.; Digital contracture deformity after implantation of a silicone prosthesis: Light and electron microscopic study; The Journal of Hand Surgery; vol. 3; No. 3; pp. 266-270; May 1978. |
D'Ermo et al.; Our results with the operation of ab externo; Ophthalmologica; vol. 168; pp. 347-355; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1971. |
France et al.; Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff fixation methods; The American Journal of Sports Medicine; vol. 17; No. 2; pp. 176-181; Mar.-Apr. 1989. |
Goodship et al.; An assessment of filamentous carbon fibre for the treatment of tendon injury in the horse; Veterinary Record; vol. 106; pp. 217-221; Mar. 8, 1980. |
Hunter et al.; Flexor-tendon reconstruction in severely damaged hands; The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume); vol. 53-A; No. 5; pp. 329-358; Jul. 1971. |
Johnstone et al.; Microsurgery of Schlemm's canal and the human aqueous outflow system; Am. J. Opthalmology; vol. 76; No. 6; pp. 906-917; Dec. 1973. |
Kowalsky et al.; Evaluation of suture abrasion against rotator cuff tendon and proximal humerus bone; Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery; vol. 24; No. 3; pp. 329-334; Mar. 2008. |
Lee et al.; Aqueous-venous and intraocular pressure. Preliminary report of animal studies; Investigative Ophthalmology; vol. 5; No. 1; pp. 59-64; Feb. 1966. |
Maepea et al.; The pressures in the episcleral veins, Schlemm's canal and the trabecular meshwork in monkeys: Effects of changes in intraocular pressure; Exp. Eye Res.; vol. 49; pp. 645-663; Oct. 1989. |
Nicolle et al.; A silastic tendon prosthesis as an adjunct to flexor tendon grafting . . . ; British Journal of Plastic Surgery; 22(3-4); pp. 224-236; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1969. |
Rubin et al.; The use of acellular biologic tissue patches in foot and ankle surgery; Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery; nol. 22; pp. 533-552; Oct. 2005. |
Schultz; Canaloplasty procedure shows promise for open-angle glaucoma in European study; Ocular Surgery News; pp. 34-35; Mar. 1, 2007. |
Spiegel et al.; Schlemm's canal implant: A new method to lower intraocular pressure in patients with POAG; Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers; vol. 30; No. 6; pp. 492-494; Jun. 1999. |
Stetson et al.; Arthroscopic treatment of partial rotator cuff tears; Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine; vol. 12, Issue 2; pp. 135-148; Apr. 2004. |
Valdez et al.; Repair of digital flexor tendon lacerations in the horse, using carbon fiber implants; JAYMA; vol. 177; No. 5; pp. 427-435; Sep. 1, 1980. |
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; Rotator cuff tear; downloaded from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotator—cuff—tear> on Dec. 6, 2012; 14 pages. |
Euteneuer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,675 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Fixing Sheet-Like Materials to a Target Tissue,” filed May 8, 2013. |
Euteneuer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,687 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Delivering Staples to a Target Tissue,” filed May 8, 2013. |
Van Kampen et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,701 entitled “Tendon repair implant and method of arthroscopic implantation,” filed May 8, 2013. |
Euteneuer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,722 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Forming Pilot Holes in Bone and Delivering Fasteners Therein for Retaining an Implant,” filed May 8, 2013. |
Euteneuer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,757 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Delivering and Positioning Sheet-Like Materials in Surgery,” filed May 8, 2013. |
Euteneuer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,774 entitled “Guidewire Having a Distal Fixation Member for Delivering and Positioning Sheet-Like Materials in Surgery,” filed May 8, 2013. |
Euteneuer et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/889,832 entitled “Anatomical location Markers and Methods of Use in Positioning Sheet-Like Materials During Surgery,” filed May 8, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130240598 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61577626 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13717493 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 13889737 | US |