The present invention relates to a fastening system. In particular, the present invention relates to a feedback control for a fastening system.
A typical fastening system includes a motor that drives an output element to rotate a threaded fastener onto a threaded connecting element. Proper connection of the fastener requires exertion of torque on the fastener and proper alignment of the threads.
Operators desire a fastening system that indicates when inadequate tightening of the fastener and/or improper alignment of the threaded fastener occurs. Indication lights and/or audio alarms can be difficult to recognize in a fast-paced and noisy industrial environment.
In one construction, the invention provides a fastening system that includes a housing defining a chamber, a motor positioned within the chamber and having a rotor, a sensor, and a controller. The sensor is coupled to the rotor and provides a feedback signal of a motor operation. The controller receives the feedback signal, determines an error condition based upon the feedback signal, and oscillates the rotor between a first position and a second position to vibrate the housing in response to the error condition. The vibrating housing provides an indication to the user that the fastener was improperly installed. In one construction, the sensor is a torque transducer and the feedback signal represents a torque force exerted by the motor. In a second construction, the sensor provides a feedback signal that represents a revolution of the rotor.
In another construction, the invention provides a method for indicating an error condition of a fastening system that includes detecting a feedback signal from a motor of the fastener system, comparing the feedback signal to a threshold value, determining an error condition based upon the feedback signal, and oscillating a rotor to the motor between a first position and a second position to vibrate a housing to the motor in response to the error condition.
As is apparent from the above, it is an aspect of the invention to provide a system and method for providing precision fastening of a fastener. Other features and aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any constructions of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other constructions and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
An exemplary control console 27 having the controller 30 and the user interface 32 is the INSIGHT™ Model PFS manufactured by the INGERSOLL-RAND™ Company. However, the fastening system 10 of the invention can work with other motor controllers and/or user interfaces known in the art and is not limiting on the invention.
One construction of the communication bus 25, as shown in
The fastening tool 20 provides the torque for driving a fastener. As shown in
Among its functions, the processor 75 is configured by the software to receive signals or input from sensors/transducers, to analyze the received signals and input, and to generate command signals to the stator 50 of the fastening tool 20. In one construction, the processor 75 is a microprocessor operable in executing a plurality of instructions. An example microprocessor is an Intel Pentium processor of a personal computer. However, other processors (e.g., programmable logic controllers, etc.) known to those skilled in the art can be used.
In one construction, the controller 30 includes a servo-drive control device to control operation of the motor 35. In general, the servo-drive control device receives feedback information from sensors/transducers at the motor 35, processes the feedback information, and adjusts the control signal to the stator 50 in response to the feedback information. Of course, other types of controllers known to those skilled in the art can be used.
Referring to
Referring to
The controller 30 translates the signal provided by the resolver 105 into an angular rotation turned by the rotor 55 and/or interconnected output spindle 40 in driving the fastener. The controller 30 can include a comparator that determines if the measured value for the angular rotation of the rotor 55 and/or spindle 40 is outside a threshold range stored in the memory 80 of the controller 30. Using a factor associated with a gear ratio of the motor 35, the controller 30 can convert the angle of rotation or number of revolutions turned by the rotor 55 into an angle of rotation traveled by the output spindle 40. An angular rotation of the rotor 55 and/or spindle 40 outside the threshold range can indicate that a threaded fastener was installed with the threads out of alignment, and/or the fastener is improperly tightened. The controller 30 can also use the feedback signal from the resolver 105 to regulate the speed and/or position of the rotor 55, as described later.
In another construction of the invention, the resolver 105 can include a comparator that enables the resolver 105 to signal the controller 30 if the rotational angle traveled by the rotor 55 is outside a predetermined threshold range. In yet another construction of the invention, one or more Hall effect sensors can be used to provide a feedback signal to the controller 30 indicative of the rotor 55 position.
The controller 30 can also determine an error condition using various combinations of torque information and angle of rotation information, etc. provided by the various sensors/transducers located at the motor 35. For example, the controller 30 can monitor a yield of the fastening operation based upon the slope of the measured torque versus angle of rotation. In another example, the controller 30 can monitor the angle of rotation information or the number of revolutions once the controller 30 detects a threshold torque force.
As noted above, the controller 30 includes a memory 80 for storage of control feedback information from the sensors/transducers described above. In one construction, the controller 30 sets the predetermined threshold ranges for an error condition (e.g., torque, angle of rotation, number of revolutions, etc.) based upon the feedback information from the sensors/transducers. In one construction, the threshold range for an error condition can be determined from the most recent twenty-five measured samples of fastening parameters collected from fastening operations. In another construction, the threshold range for an error condition can be determined from the first twenty-five measured samples of fastening parameters collected from fastening operations. Of course, the selection or number of samples can vary and is not limiting on the invention. In yet another construction, the controller 30 can use different threshold ranges for detecting an error condition for different stages of fastening operations (e.g., start, end, etc.).
Upon detecting an error condition, the controller 30 provides an alarm indication to the operator. As described above, the controller 30 can detect error conditions based upon the torque and angle of rotation feedback from the torque transucer 85 and/or resolver 105 at the motor 35. The controller 30 alerts the operator of the error condition by vibrating the housing 45. To vibrate the housing 45 (
As shown in
Having described the basic architecture of the fastening system 10, the operation of the fastening system 10 will now be described.
In operation, the operator or user activates the fastening system 10 of the invention. Upon activation, the controller 30 uploads stored threshold ranges for torque, angle of rotation, number of revolutions, etc. respective to the sensors and transducers of the fastening tool 20. The values of the threshold ranges can depend upon the particular fastening tool 20, output spindle 40, and fastener being used. This information can be entered by manual computer entry or scanned by an infrared scanner. In one construction, the controller 30 is connected to a fastening tool 20 having a type of output spindle 40 to drive a fastener. In another construction, the controller 30 can be used to simultaneously control more than one fastening tool 20 having a plurality of output spindles for driving various types of fasteners. Upon selecting the type of control for the respective fastening operation, the operator engages the fastening tool 20 to install the fastener to the assembly. The torque transducer 85 and resolver 105 at the motor 35 provide feedback information to the controller 30. Using the threshold values, the controller 30 determines from the feedback information whether the fastener has been properly installed. If the controller 30 determines from the measured control information that an error condition exists (e.g., sub-threshold torque, inadequate rotation of rotor, excessive torque, excessive rotation of rotor, etc.), the controller 30 causes the rotor 55 of the motor 35 to oscillate between the first 110 and the second 115 position. In controlling the oscillation of the rotor 55, the controller 30 uses the feedback information of the rotor position provided by the resolver 105. Based upon the feedback information of the rotor position, the controller 30 provides the control signal that energizes the plurality of stator windings 60 to cause the rotor 55 to oscillate. The oscillation of the rotor 55 causes the housing 45 to vibrate. The vibrating housing 45 provides a tactile indication to the operator that an error condition exists. In one construction, the controller 30 can vibrate the housing 45 at the same frequency to signify an error condition. In another construction, the controller 30 can vibrate the housing 45 at a different frequency depending upon the type of error condition (e.g., torque, angle, etc.). The controller 30 can also provide other indications of the error condition via other visual and/or audio indicators at the user interface 32.
In another construction, an operator can elect to drive the fastener, then backout or reverse the fastener before driving the fastener again. An operator can elect this method of fastening based upon the type of fastener or to correct an error condition. The controller 30 can monitor torque, angle, etc. of the fastener tool 20 during both forward and reverse modes of operation. For example, to correct an error condition, the operator can elect to reverse the fastening operation, called fault backout. In one construction of the invention, the controller 30 can automatically deactivate the error detecting sensors (e.g., torque, angle of rotation, number of revolutions, etc.) and indicators (e.g., vibrating the housing 45) when the operator selects to fault backout the fastener. Upon retrying or driving forward the fastener, the controller 30 can automatically re-activate the error condition detecting sensors and indicators. In another construction, the controller 30 can monitor for an error condition during both forward and reverse modes of operation.
Thus, the invention provides, among other things, a feedback control for a fastening system. Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4958541 | Annis et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5327035 | Sunaga | Jul 1994 | A |
5478164 | Mori | Dec 1995 | A |
D372457 | Okuyama et al. | Aug 1996 | S |
5684287 | Walts | Nov 1997 | A |
5725533 | Carlsson | Mar 1998 | A |
5798588 | Okuyama et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5889349 | Yasuda | Mar 1999 | A |
5936516 | Narea et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949333 | Lehmann et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5952745 | Yasuda | Sep 1999 | A |
6060816 | Audren | May 2000 | A |
6211775 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
20020182564 | Katsuda et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030094081 | Becker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040172800 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |