The application is the U.S. National Stage of International Application Number PCT/EP2013/076040, filed on Dec. 10, 2013, which claims the benefit of German Patent Application Number 10 2012 223 025.4, filed on Dec. 13, 2012, which are each incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a fastener-driving tool according to the preamble of Claim 1.
DE 102 53 670 A1 describes a fastener-driving tool operated with fuel gas, in which a driving piston is held in a starting position by means of a magnet. Thereby a movement of the piston does not start until the combusted fuel gas pressure exceeds the retaining force of the magnet.
The problem addressed by the invention is that of specifying a fastener-driving tool in which a magnetically retained piston is subject to a high retaining force.
This problem is solved for a fastening device of the type mentioned above by the characterizing features of Claim 1. A particularly strong retaining force can be achieved in an easy manner by forming two magnetically conductive stops on a mass of the retaining member. It is particularly preferable if as many magnetic field lines from the excitation magnet as possible pass through the two stops and the contacting mating piece in a closed curve.
In relation to the drive force acting on the piston element, the design of the fastener-driving tool is arbitrary. The invention essentially relates to the magnetic retention of the piston element and in general comprises all fastener-driving tool designs with an accelerated piston element. The tool is preferably a tool driven with fuel gas, in which the drive force is generated by the pressure of the fuel gas ignited in a combustion chamber. The acceleration behavior of the piston is improved if it is released only after the highest possible retaining force exerted by the retaining element has been exceeded. Another preferred embodiment of the fastener-driving tool can be operated with compressed air.
A fastening element within the meaning of the invention is considered to be any drivable nail, bolt or screw.
A magnetically conductive material within the meaning of the invention is understood to mean any material having a high permeability factor μ>>1, preferably μ>4. In particular, a magnetic conductor is understood to mean ferromagnetic substances.
At least the stops and/or the mating piece, as magnetically conductive structures, preferably also consist of a tenacious material, for example iron or an iron alloy, so that contacting or striking by the piston in the retained position does not cause a mechanical destruction or degradation of these structures.
The excitation magnet within the meaning of the invention is understood to mean a structure by which the magnetic retaining force can be provided entirely or at least overwhelmingly. It is especially preferably a permanent magnet having a high magnetic field density. Alternatively or additionally, an electromagnet can be provided as an excitation magnet. By designing the excitation magnet as a permanent magnet, very high retaining forces are possible, particularly with high-quality, modern magnet materials, along with a small installation space and weight of the retaining element. An electromagnet has the advantage that the retaining force can be shut off or modified as necessary.
It is particularly preferred if the mating piece does not directly contact the excitation magnet, in order to prevent mechanical effects on the excitation magnet. Preferably there is only contact with the magnetically conductive stops, wherein an additional contact with elastic damping means can be provided, depending on the detailed design. Preferably only a small distance, via which retaining forces are likewise transmitted and magnetic field lines run, remains between the excitation magnet and the mating piece.
The mating piece is preferably, but not necessarily, formed as a separate component of the piston element. In particular, it can be a ferromagnetic circular ring, which is mounted on a piston made of a different material such as a light metal. Alternatively, the entire piston can also consist of a ferromagnetic material.
For clarification, it should be noted that the magnetically conductive stops and other magnetically conductive structures in the narrow sense, as well as the excitation magnet, consist of ferromagnetic material and can have an unavoidable permanent magnetization, depending on the material. However, the magnetization of the excitation magnet within the meaning of the invention is many times, in particular more than 10 times, the magnetization of the magnetically conductive structures. Consequently, the retaining force within the meaning of the invention is generated overwhelmingly by the field lines exiting from the excitation magnet.
A generally preferred embodiment of the invention provides that the excitation magnet is arranged, at least in certain portions, in a circular ring shape about a central axis of the piston element. Depending on the detailed design, the excitation magnet can be formed as a closed circular ring, or as a plurality of segments arranged in succession in the circumferential direction.
In a preferred refinement, the first stop and the second stop each form, at least in certain portions, a circular ring concentric with the excitation magnet, wherein one of the stops has a smaller radius than the excitation magnet, and the respective other stop has a larger radius than the excitation magnet. Such an arrangement allows optimal exertion of a large retaining force in a relatively narrow peripheral region of the piston element. A narrow peripheral region can be advantageous under certain circumstances, because then the effective surface of the piston on which the gas acts is larger.
A first preferred embodiment provides that the stops adjoin and contact the excitation magnet, wherein an overwhelming portion of the magnetic field lines from the excitation magnet enter radially into the stops. Such an arrangement is especially compact and weight-saving but has relatively high requirements for the production accuracy of the stops and the excitation magnet.
In another, alternative embodiment of the invention, a defined gap is provided between the stops and the excitation magnet, wherein a magnetically conductive coupling element connects the stops and the excitation magnet on a side facing away from the piston. This allows a simple and cost-effective mass production of the retaining element with simultaneously especially high retaining forces. The gap is implemented in particular by a set-back arrangement of the excitation magnet relative to the stops. Alternatively or additionally, the piston element has a surface contour which guarantees a gap between itself and the excitation magnet.
In a generally preferred refinement of the invention, it is provided that the excitation magnet is covered on a side facing the piston by a magnetically conductive foil. It is especially preferred if the foil conductively connects the two stops magnetically. A thickness of the foil is preferably, but not necessarily, less than 0.5 mm. Such a foil can prevent the magnetic flux density in the excitation magnet from taking on critical values, especially at high temperatures, which could lead to a demagnetization of the excitation magnet and reduce its service life. In particular, it is thereby possible to use more cost-effective materials, which have a higher temperature sensitivity, when selecting the excitation magnet.
The design according to the invention of the magnetic retaining element enables particularly high retaining forces for a given overall size and weight of the retaining element. To improve the piston acceleration, it is therefore preferred that a retaining force F of the retaining element is at least F/d=25 N/cm relative to a diameter d of the piston.
Further advantages and features of the invention follow from the embodiments described below as well as from the dependent claims. Several preferred embodiments of the invention will be described below and explained in detail with reference to the attached drawings.
The fastener-driving tool shown in
The piston 1 is driven in the present case by the expansion of an ignited air/fuel gas mixture in a combustion chamber 4 arranged above the cylinder 2. In an initial position shown in
The magnetic retaining element 1 is shown in more detail in
Annular air gaps 10 remain between the stops 7, 8 and the excitation magnet, such that the excitation magnet is connected to the stops 7, 8 in a non-contacting manner radially.
The stops 7, 8 have annular front sides 7a, 8a, against which a mating piece 9 of the piston element 1 rests. The stops 7, 8 are magnetically connected by the mating piece 9 and therefore a high magnetic retaining force pulls the mating piece 9 against the stops 7, 8.
An air gap 6a, preferably having a width less than 0.4 mm and typically a width of approximately 0.1 mm remains between the excitation magnet 6 and the mating piece 9. Therefore the mating piece 6 does not directly contact the excitation magnet, but at the same time, a sufficient passage of field lines is ensured by the small width of the air gap 6a. The air gap 6a is preferably as small as possible.
The stops 7, 8 are connected to one another via a coupling element 11 on a side facing away from the piston element 1, wherein the excitation magnet is mounted contacting the coupling element 11. The excitation magnet 6 and the coupling element 11 can be connected by gluing, form-fitting connecting means or in some other manner.
The stops 7, 8, the coupling element 11 and the mating piece 9 each consist within the meaning of the invention of magnetically conductive material such as an iron alloy or a sintered ferrite.
The calculation or simulation of the magnetic field lines in
In the present example, the piston element 1 has a diameter d of 7 cm. The calculation of the retaining force F shown in
In the calculation according to
The weight of the retaining element can be optimized by considering and optimizing these and other geometric parameters. Additional geometric pattern parameters are the width of the air gaps 10, preferably but not necessarily identical, the height and width of the magnet 6 and the height and width of the stops 7, 8.
Differently from the first embodiment, it is possible to forgo a coupling element between the stops, due to the absence of air gaps. This enables a lighter construction with comparable retaining forces. The stops 7, 8 shown in
The example from
In the present case, the foil has a thickness or height of approximately 0.1 mm. As is recognizable from
On the whole, the foil 12 leads to an attenuation, albeit small, of the achievable retaining force F. However, the foil can have the effect that the excitation magnets do not undergo any demagnetization due to the changing positions of the piston, even at higher temperatures.
The left-hand diagram shows the magnetization behavior of the permanent magnet 6 as a solid line at a given temperature of 150° C. The lower dash line corresponds to a piston distance of Delta=10 mm, which can be equated to a maximally distant piston. The upper dash line corresponds to a piston element 1 in the base position with a contacting mating part (Delta=0.1 mm).
The inflection or sharp decline in the left-hand area of the solid curve corresponds to states of magnetic flux density in which an at least partial demagnetization of the excitation magnet 6 takes place when the piston changes its position. These states are not reached at the given temperature.
The above-described foil 12 can be used to ensure this for the entire range of operating temperatures Alternatively, a material for the permanent magnet that is as suitable as possible could be chosen, which would involve very high expense, however.
The right hand diagram in
The foil thickness (“foil height”) selected for the left-hand diagram in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 223 025 | Dec 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/076040 | 12/10/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/090780 | 6/19/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3584776 | Bolte | Jun 1971 | A |
3788195 | Lange | Jan 1974 | A |
3878412 | Kurpanek | Apr 1975 | A |
4237987 | Sherman | Dec 1980 | A |
4353426 | Ward | Oct 1982 | A |
5213247 | Gschwend et al. | May 1993 | A |
5497555 | Averbukh | Mar 1996 | A |
6520269 | Geiger | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6619527 | Moeller | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6736614 | Bahnen | May 2004 | B1 |
6843401 | Favre-Bulle | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6971568 | Schiestl | Dec 2005 | B2 |
8087394 | Adams | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20040079302 | Wolf et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040104258 | Favre-Bulle | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040108353 | Wolf et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070240683 | Zahner et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
40 32 204 | Apr 1992 | DE |
102 53 670 | Jun 2004 | DE |
102 54 965 | Jun 2004 | DE |
2004-034288 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2005-059158 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2007-283485 | Nov 2007 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT/EP2013/076040, dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150306751 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |