Fault current limiter

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention

The invention relates to a fault current limiter.

Description of the Related Art

High voltage direct current (DC) circuit breakers are considered to be one of the effective ways to solve the problem of short-circuit fault in DC power systems. However, with the rapid development of the power transmission network, the short-circuit current is increasingly large, and conventional high voltage DC circuit breakers are unable to interrupt the fault current. In addition, conventional high voltage DC circuit breakers are structurally complex and bulky, and lead to high power losses.

Fault current limiters (FCLs) utilize superconducting materials to limit the fault current. In normal operation, current flows through the superconducting materials without resistance and with negligible impedance. When a fault develops, the superconducting materials quench, the resistance rises sharply, and current is diverted to a parallel circuit which has a desirably higher impedance.

Conventional superconducting fault current limiters can be classified in one of two major categories: resistive or inductive.

Resistive fault current limiters are not efficient in limiting the short-circuit current peak and controlling the quenching process, thus adversely affecting the reliability of the devices.

Inductive fault current limiters are not efficient in suppressing steady-state short-circuit current, and require a large amount of iron metal to carry out their function, meaning that inductive FCLs are much bigger and heavier than resistive FCLs.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the above-described problems, it is one objective of the invention to provide a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter.

Based on the characteristics of the resistive and the inductive superconducting fault current limiters, a topological structure of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter including resistive components and inductive components is put forward to protect the DC system when the short-circuit fault occurs. The hybrid superconducting fault current limiter is capable of fast energy transfer, is easy to engineer, has a compact structure, and exhibits outstanding performance index in cost, size, complexity, and response speed.

To achieve the above objective, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter, comprising two inductors, a direct current circuit breaker, a shunt resistor, a first fixed resistor, and metal oxide arresters. The inductors comprise wound superconducting wires. The inductors have identical number of windings and identical structure. Magnetic fluxes of the inductors are forward coupled, and the inductors are connected in parallel to form a superconducting inductor structure.

In a class of this embodiment, the direct current circuit breaker and the superconducting inductor structure are connected in series to form a series branch.

In a class of this embodiment, the shunt resistor is connected in parallel to the series branch.

In a class of this embodiment, the first fixed resistor is connected in parallel to the direct current circuit breaker.

In a class of this embodiment, the metal oxide arresters are two in number and are connected in parallel to the two inductors.

The inventive concept of the present disclosure of the invention comprises the topological structure of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter. The superconducting inductor structure of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter is connected in parallel to a shunt resistor, forming a main structure. When a fault develops, the inductors prevent the current from increasing, and the fault current is diverted to a resistor branch where the current-limiting resistor quickly takes effect, thus the peak current is quickly limited. In the main structure, the inductors have identical number of windings and identical structure. Magnetic fluxes of the inductors are forward coupled, and the inductors are connected in parallel to form a superconducting inductor structure. Magnetic fluxes are forward coupled so as to improve the overall superconducting inductor gain and reduce the adverse effect of inductance drop caused by parallel connection of the superconducting wires. Meanwhile, the two identical superconducting inductors are connected in parallel, when a fault develops, the two inductors can jointly bear the current shock, and each inductor bears only a half of the current shock of the superconducting inductor structure, thus reducing the influence of fault current on the superconducting inductors. In the main structure, the superconducting inductor structure is connected to the direct current circuit breaker in series, and the direct current circuit breaker is connected to the first fixed resistor in parallel. In normal operation of the DC system, the direct current circuit breaker is switched on, and the current flows through the series branch of the superconducting inductor structure. The fault current limiter works as a smoothing reactor. When a fault develops, the direct current circuit breaker is switched off, and the superconducting inductor structure works to divert the fault current to the shunt resistor so that the peak current is limited and the superconducting inductor structure is protected from damage caused by the fault current, meanwhile, the resistive component in the series branch ensures that the steady short-circuit current is also limited. Because the direct current circuit breaker is connected to the fixed resistor in parallel, the break voltage is suppressed, facilitating the switching of the direct current circuit breaker, and improving the stability of the switching. The direct current circuit breaker is light-weight, and the production cost is reduced. The metal oxide arresters are configured to prevent overvoltage of the inductor.

In a class of this embodiment, the shunt resistor is a second fixed resistor.

In a class of this embodiment, the superconducting inductors are in a superconducting state when the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter is in use.

In a class of this embodiment, the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter is disposed at a head or a tail of a DC transmission line.

In a class of this embodiment, the inductors are a hollow structure or comprise an iron core.

In a class of this embodiment, the arresters are metal oxide arresters.

Advantages of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter according to embodiments of the invention are summarized as follows:

1. Compared with the fault current limiter in the prior art, the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter of the invention is capable of fast energy transfer, easy to engineer, has a compact structure, and exhibits outstanding performance index in cost, size, complexity, and response speed. Based on the characteristics of the resistive and the inductive superconducting fault current limiters, a topological structure of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter including resistive components and inductive components is put forward to protect the DC system when the short-circuit fault occurs. In normal operation of the DC system, the fault current limiter works as a smoothing reactor, and has no energy consumption. When a fault develops, the fault current limiter can obviously limit the current and works to compensate the voltage drop of the DC system. Because the superconducting inductor structure of the current limiter is connected to a shunt resistor in parallel, when a fault occurs, the fault current is quickly diverted to the resistor branch, and the peak current is limited. When the direct current circuit breaker is switched off, the current limiting function of the current limiter can be further improved, and the steady short-circuit current is limited. The superconducting inductors are unlikely to quench during the current limiting process, thus ensuring the security and stability of the superconducting structure.

2. The hybrid superconducting fault current limiter based on fast energy transfer can be applied to DC low-voltage lines and DC high-voltage transmission lines, and can respond to monopolar grounding fault and bipolar short-circuit fault, thus the requirements for fault current limiter as an important device for power grid construction under the condition that the short-circuit capacity of the power grid are increasing are satisfied, and relay protection configuration and stability of the DC system are maintained, meanwhile, the transient stability and the security in the steady state of the power grid are ensured.

3. The hybrid superconducting fault current limiter of the invention is capable of fast energy transfer, easy to engineer, has a compact structure, and exhibits outstanding performance index in cost, size, complexity, and response speed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is described hereinbelow with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a topological structure of a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 2A-2C are operating diagrams of a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; in which, FIG. 2A is a diagram showing current flow in the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter during a normal operation of a DC system; FIG. 2B is a diagram showing current flow in the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter before a direct current circuit breaker is switched off when a short-circuit fault occurs in the DC system (t=t₁); and FIG. 2C is diagram showing current flow in the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter after the direct current circuit breaker is switched off when a short-circuit fault occurs in the DC system (t=t₂=t₁+Δt);

FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram showing a connection between a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter and a high-voltage DC transmission system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a comparison diagram of DC voltage variations in a high-voltage DC transmission system with and without a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter when a bipolar grounding fault develops in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 5 is a comparison diagram of direct current variations in a high-voltage DC transmission system with and without a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter when a bipolar grounding fault develops in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing variation of equivalent current-limiting resistance of a hybrid superconducting current limiter when a bipolar grounding fault develops in a high-voltage DC transmission system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8 is a comparison diagram showing current variations in a superconducting inductor structure having and not having a series connection to a direct current circuit breaker which is connected to a fixed resistor in parallel when a bipolar grounding fault develops in a high-voltage DC transmission system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 9 is comparison diagram showing break voltage variations of a direct current circuit breaker having and not having a parallel connection to a fixed resistor when a bipolar grounding fault develops in a high-voltage DC transmission system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

For further illustrating the invention, experiments detailing a hybrid superconducting fault current limiter are described below. It should be noted that the following examples are intended to describe and not to limit the invention.

A hybrid superconducting fault current limiter comprises two inductors, a direct current circuit breaker, a shunt resistor, a first fixed resistor, and metal oxide arresters. The inductors comprise wound superconducting wires. The inductors have identical number of windings and identical structure. Magnetic fluxes of the inductors are forward coupled, and the inductors are connected in parallel to form a superconducting inductor structure. The direct current circuit breaker and the superconducting inductor structure are connected in series to form a series branch. The shunt resistor is connected in parallel to the series branch. The first fixed resistor is connected in parallel to the direct current circuit breaker. The metal oxide arresters are two in number and are connected in parallel to the two inductors.

In a class of this embodiment, the main structure of the fault current limiter comprises two identical inductors. Magnetic fluxes of the inductors are forward coupled, and the inductors are connected in parallel to form a superconducting inductor structure. The superconducting inductor structure is connected in parallel to the current-limiting resistor and forms two branches on which the current flows. The inductors comprise wound superconducting wires. The inductors are a hollow structure or the inductors comprise an iron core. The current-limiting resistor is a second fixed resistor. In operation, the inductors in the fault current limiter are always in the superconducting state.

In a class of this embodiment, the superconducting inductor structure is connected to the direct current circuit breaker in series to form the series branch, and in the series branch the direct current circuit breaker is connected to the first fixed resistor in parallel. When no fault occurs in a direct current (DC) system, the direct current circuit breaker is switched on, and the first fixed resistor which is connected in parallel to the direct current circuit breaker is short-circuit. In the DC system, the branch of the current-limiting resistor is short-circuit because the series branch has no resistive component, thus steady-state direct current only flows through the series branch which has the superconducting inductors. The fault current limiter has no resistive component at the moment, and the consumption is low and can be neglected, meanwhile, the superconducting inductor structure works as a smoothing reactor. When a short-circuit fault develops, the fault current limiter can quickly limit the peak current and compensate for the voltage drop of the DC system, meanwhile, the direct current circuit breaker is switched off, so that the peak current and steady short-circuit current are both limited.

In a class of this embodiment, when the short-circuit fault occurs, compared with the direct current circuit breaker having no parallel connection to the first fixed resistor, the direct current circuit breaker in the superconducting fault current limiter is connected to the first fixed resistor in parallel, and the first fixed resistor works to suppress the break voltage of the direct current circuit breaker when the direct current circuit breaker is switching off, thus lowering the peak value of the break voltage, facilitating the switching of the direct current circuit breaker, reducing the switching capacity of the direct current circuit breaker, and decreasing the production cost thereof to a large extent.

In a class of this embodiment, the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter is disposed at a head or a tail of a DC transmission line.

The working principle of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter is as follows:

During the normal operation of the DC system, the fault current limiter provides a superconducting inductor structure which works as a smoothing reactor to reduce AC ripple component and remove a part of the harmonics, meanwhile ensuring that the smoothing reactor has no resistive consumption.

When a monopolar grounding fault or a bipolar short-circuit fault occurs in the DC system, the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter responds quickly. Based on the parallel structure of the inductors and the current-limiting resistor and the principle that the inductive current cannot change abruptly, at the moment the fault occurs, the current is quickly diverted to the shunt resistor in the DC system with higher equivalent current-limiting impedance so that the peak current is effectively limited. The shunt resistor provides a transfer branch for the short-circuit current and reduces the current shock of the superconducting inductor structure. Meanwhile the two inductors can jointly bear the current shock, and each inductor bears only a half of the current shock of the superconducting inductor structure, thus reducing the influence of fault current on the superconducting inductors.

Magnetic fluxes are forward coupled so as to reduce the adverse effect of inductance drop caused by parallel connection of the superconducting wires. While the current limiting function is realized, the number of windings of the inductors is reduced, thus saving wires. The direct current circuit breaker is connected to the first fixed resistor in parallel, when the direct current circuit breaker is switched off, the first fixed resistor takes effect and prevents the superconducting inductors from quenching, and thus the security and stability of the inductors are ensured. The first fixed resistance works to suppress the break voltage, thus lowering the break voltage of the direct current circuit breaker, facilitating the switching of the direct current circuit breaker, and enhancing the stability of the on-off action of the direct current circuit breaker.

The hybrid superconducting fault current limiter in the example is further illustrated as follows:

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a topological structure of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter based on fast energy transfer, as shown in FIG. 1, the topological structure of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter comprises two fixed resistor R₁and R₂, two superconducting inductors L₁and L₂, two metal oxide arresters R_MOA1and R_MOA2, and a direct current circuit breaker S₁. The fixed resistor R₁is a current-limiting resistor and works as a shunt resistor. The inductor L₁is connected to L₂to form the superconducting structure which works as the smoothing reactor.

The inductor L₁is connected to L₂in parallel so as to jointly bear current shock and lower the fault current shock of each inductor. Magnetic fluxes of L₁and L₂are forward coupled so as to improve the inductance gain. Two ends of the direct current circuit breaker S₁are connected to the fixed resistor R₂in parallel, thus over-voltage is suppressed, and the break voltage of the direct current circuit breaker S₁is lowered. The parallel connection between the direct current circuit breaker S₁and the fixed resistor R₂can lower the overcurrent in the superconducting inductors L₁and L₂and prevent the superconducting inductors from quenching. The two metal oxide arresters R_MOA1and R_MOA2are configured to limit the dynamic overcurrent in the inductors L₁and L₂.

FIGS. 2A-2C is operating diagrams of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter based on fast energy transfer; in which, FIG. 2A is a diagram showing current flow in the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter during a normal operation of a DC system; FIG. 2B is a diagram showing current flow in the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter before the direct current circuit breaker is switched off when a short-circuit fault develops in the DC system (t=t₁); and FIG. 2C is diagram showing current flow in the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter after the direct current circuit breaker is switched off when the short-circuit fault develops in the DC system (t=t₂=t₁+Δt). As shown in FIG. 2A, during normal operation of the DC system, no fault develops, and the direct current circuit breaker S₁is switched on. The current in the DC system only flows through the superconducting inductors L₁and L₂, and the two inductors respectively bear a half of the current. In the DC system, as the superconducting inductors are in the superconducting state, the superconducting inductors have no resistive voltage, thus the fault current limiter in the superconducting state under 77 K of liquid nitrogen condition has no energy consumption. Low energy consumption facilitates the long-term operation of electrical equipment in series with the DC system. The superconducting inductors in series with the DC system can work as the smoothing reactor, thus reduces the AC ripple component and removes a part of the harmonic component. The communication jamming on the transmission lines is reduced, and unstable harmonic conditioning is avoided.

As shown in FIG. 2B, when t=t₁, a short-circuit fault develops in the DC system, and the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter is in the current-limiting state I. As the inductive current i₂cannot change abruptly, the current rise in the superconducting inductor structure is hindered, and most of the short-circuit current i₁is diverted to the shunt resistor R₁. As the inductors hinder the current variation, the shunt resistor R₁automatically takes effect and the shunt resistor R₁limits the peak current. Because the two identical inductors L₁and L₂are connected in parallel, the current flowing through the two inductors is a half of i₂. Under this circumstance, the short-circuit current has four components: i₁, i₂, i₃, and i₄, and i₁>i₂, i₃=i₄=i₂/2.

As shown in FIG. 2C, Δt is the fault detection time. After Δt, the direct current circuit breaker S₁is switched off at t₂, thus the current component i₂which flows through the superconducting inductors is limited and the superconducting inductors L₁and L₂is prevented from quenching. The voltage of the inductors is lowered due to the fixed resistor R₂. Meanwhile, the over-voltage at two ends of the direct current circuit breaker S₁is suppressed by the fixed resistor R₂, thus the amplitude of the break voltage is limited. Under this circumstance, the fixed resistors R₁and R₂and the superconducting inductors L₁and L₂are all connected to the DC system to limit the current. As the fault current limiter features both resistive component and inductive component, the fault current limiter is hybrid.

FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram showing a connection between the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter based on fast energy transfer and a high-voltage DC transmission system. As shown in FIG. 3, an application of the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter involves in a simple VSC high-voltage DC transmission system. The fault current limiter is mounted on an end of the transmission line. Assuming that a grounding fault develops at an end of the transmission line at t₁=2 s, after 5 ms, at t₂, the direct current circuit breaker S₁of the fault current limiter is switched off.

FIG. 4 is a comparison diagram of DC voltage variations in the high-voltage DC transmission system with and without the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter when a bipolar grounding fault develops; or FIG. 4 is an oscillogram of the DC voltage U_dcat an end of the DC system. According to the comparison in FIG. 4, after the fault occurs, the fault current limiter can compensate the voltage drop in the DC system at a certain extent, and slower the voltage drop.

FIG. 5 is a comparison diagram of direct current variations in the high-voltage DC transmission system with and without the hybrid superconducting fault current limiter when a bipolar grounding fault develops; or FIG. 5 is an oscillogram of direct current in the transmission line. As shown in FIG. 5, the fault current limiter can obviously limit the current when short-circuit fault develops, and the peak current drops from 57.81 kA to 25.89 kA. The rate of short-circuit current limit reaches 55.2%.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing variation of equivalent current-limiting resistance of the hybrid superconducting current limiter when the bipolar grounding fault develops in the high-voltage DC transmission system; or FIG. 6 is a change curve of equivalent resistance of the fault current limiter. As shown in FIG. 6, the fault current limiter responds quickly, when the fault occurs, the equivalent resistance rapidly increases from 0Ω to 3.79Ω, and is stably at 2.4Ω. Therefore, at the beginning, the fault current limiter can limit the peak current using the maximum equivalent resistance of 3.79Ω, and then the steady short circuit current is limited by the equivalent resistance of 2.4Ω. When the equivalent resistance of the fault current limiter is 0Ω, the resistive voltage of the fault current limiter is 0 V, thus the fault current limiter has barely no energy consumption. When the equivalent resistance of the fault current limiter is high, the short-circuit current can be effectively limited by the fault current limiter.

FIG. 7 is a comparison diagram showing current in a superconducting inductor structure and current in each inductor when a bipolar grounding fault develops in a high-voltage DC transmission system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. When a fault develops, the maximum short current i₂in the superconducting inductor structure is 3.3 kA. The two superconducting inductors L₁and L₂are connected in parallel, thus the current in each inductor is only 1.65 kA which is 50% of i₂, reducing the quenching risks and improving the stability of the superconducting inductors.

FIG. 8 is a comparison diagram showing current variations in the superconducting inductors having and not having a series connection to the direct current circuit breaker which is connected to the fixed resistor in parallel when the bipolar grounding fault develops in the high-voltage DC transmission system. Due to the shunting effect the fixed resistor R₁, the fault current component in the superconducting inductors is far less than the total fault current. The superconducting inductor structure is connected to the fixed resistor R₂in series, and the fixed resistor is connected to the direct current circuit breaker S₁in parallel, thus the fault current component in the superconducting inductors is effectively limited. If the superconducting inductors have no series connection to the direct current circuit breaker S₁which is connected to the fixed resistor R₂in parallel, when a short-circuit fault develops, the peak current in the superconducting inductors reaches 7.2 kA due to the fault current component, and the current shock causes the superconducting inductors to quench and breakdown. However, when the superconducting inductors have a series connection to the direct current circuit breaker S₁which is connected to the fixed resistor R₂in parallel, at 5 ms after the short-circuit fault develops, the direct current circuit breaker S₁is switched off, and the fixed resistor R₂takes effect. The fault current in superconducting inductors is limited, and the peak current in the inductors is only 3.3 kA, if the critical current of the superconducting inductor structure is 3.5 kA, when the short-circuit fault develops, the superconducting inductors would not quench. One advantage of the topological structure of the fault current limiter is that superconducting inductors with relatively low critical current can be used to limit relatively high short-circuit current in the DC system.

FIG. 9 is a comparison diagram showing break voltage variations of the direct current circuit breaker having and not having a parallel connection to the fixed resistor when a bipolar grounding fault develops in the high-voltage DC transmission system. As shown in FIG. 9, when the direct current circuit breaker S₁has no connection to the fixed resistor R₂, the break voltage reaches 104 kV. However, when the direct current circuit breaker S₁is connected to the fixed resistor R₂, the fixed resistor R₂works to suppress the break voltage of the direct current circuit breaker S₁as the direct current circuit breaker S₁is switched off, and the break voltage is limited to be 19.85 kV, thus facilitating the switching of the direct current circuit breaker S₁, ensuring the effectiveness of the switching of the direct current circuit breaker S₁, and reducing the production cost of the direct current circuit breaker.

Unless otherwise indicated, the numerical ranges involved in the invention include the end values. While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects, and therefore, the aim in the appended claims is to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3703664	Cronin	Nov 1972	A
5121281	Pham	Jun 1992	A
5153804	Pham	Oct 1992	A
20050068701	Lee	Mar 2005	A1
20180248362	Ren	Aug 2018	A1

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	15491954	Apr 2017	US
Child	15622051		US

Fault current limiter

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (1)

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (5)

Related Publications (1)

Continuation in Parts (1)